DOCSLIB.ORG

Apalachicola Regional Airport Airport Master Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Apalachicola Regional Airport Airport Master Plan Update APALACHICOLA REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER NUMBER TWO Containing: Chapter 4: Environmental Considerations Chapter 5: Facility Requirements Prepared By: 320 Bayshore Drive, Suite A Niceville, FL 32578 In Association With DECEMBER 2019 APALACHICOLA REGIONAL AIRPORT Apalachicola, Florida Master Plan Update Table of Contents 4. Environmental Considerations .............................................................................. 4-1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Assumptions ................................................................................................. 4-3 4.3 Limitations and Exceptions ............................................................................. 4-3 4.4 Site Description ............................................................................................. 4-4 4.4.1 Location and Legal Description ................................................................ 4-4 4.4.2 Airport Property and Vicinity General Characteristics ................................. 4-5 4.4.3 Current Use of the Property ..................................................................... 4-5 4.4.4 Descriptions of Property Improvements ..................................................... 4-6 4.5 Airport Provided Information ............................................................................ 4-6 4.5.1 Land Title Records .................................................................................. 4-6 4.5.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ................................... 4-6 4.5.3 Specialized Knowledge ............................................................................ 4-6 4.5.4 Actual Knowledge ................................................................................... 4-6 4.5.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ........................................... 4-6 4.5.6 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information....................... 4-7 4.5.7 Obvious Indicators .................................................................................. 4-7 4.6 Interviews ..................................................................................................... 4-7 4.6.1 Interview with Owner ................................................................................ 4-7 4.6.2 Interviews with Site Manager..................................................................... 4-7 4.6.3 Interviews with Occupants........................................................................ 4-7 4.6.4 Interviews with Local Government Officials ................................................. 4-7 4.7 Records Review ............................................................................................ 4-7 4.7.1 Physical Setting Sources ......................................................................... 4-7 4.8 Environmental Record Sources .................................................................... 4-10 4.8.1 Airport Property ..................................................................................... 4-11 4.8.2 Adjoining Sites ...................................................................................... 4-15 4.9 Historical Use Information ............................................................................ 4-15 4.9.1 Topographical Maps .............................................................................. 4-16 4.9.2 Sanborn® Maps .................................................................................... 4-17 4.9.3 Historical Aerial Photographs .................................................................. 4-17 4.9.4 Historical City Directories ....................................................................... 4-18 i Table of Contents APALACHICOLA REGIONAL AIRPORT Apalachicola, Florida Master Plan Update 4.9.5 Previous Environmental Reports on Airport Property ................................. 4-18 4.9.6 Previous Environmental Reports on Surrounding Sites ............................. 4-18 4.10 Airport Reconnaissance ............................................................................ 4-18 4.10.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ..................................................... 4-18 4.10.2 General Property Setting ....................................................................... 4-19 4.10.3 Observations ........................................................................................ 4-19 4.11 Non-ASTM Considerations/Observations ................................................... 4-21 4.11.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials .............................................................. 4-21 4.11.2 Lead-Based Paint .................................................................................. 4-21 4.11.3 Lead in Drinking Water .......................................................................... 4-21 4.11.4 Mold ..................................................................................................... 4-21 4.11.5 Radon .................................................................................................. 4-21 4.12 Findings, Opinions and Conclusions .......................................................... 4-22 4.12.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions .................................................... 4-22 4.12.2 Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions .................................... 4-23 4.12.3 Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions ..................................... 4-23 4.12.4 Business Environmental Risks ............................................................... 4-23 4.12.5 Vapor Migration ..................................................................................... 4-23 4.12.6 De Minimis Conditions ........................................................................... 4-24 4.12.7 Recommendations ................................................................................ 4-24 4.13 Deviations ............................................................................................... 4-24 4.14 Environmental Considerations Summary ................................................... 4-25 4.14.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions .................................................... 4-25 4.14.2 Business Environmental Risks ............................................................... 4-25 4.14.3 Vapor Migration ..................................................................................... 4-26 4.14.4 Recommendations ................................................................................ 4-26 5. Facility Requirements .......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Airspace ....................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 Approaches ............................................................................................ 5-1 5.2.2 Part 77 Surfaces ..................................................................................... 5-2 5.3 Airfield .......................................................................................................... 5-4 5.3.1 Airfield Configuration ............................................................................... 5-4 5.3.2 Airfield Demand Capacity ........................................................................ 5-4 ii Table of Contents APALACHICOLA REGIONAL AIRPORT Apalachicola, Florida Master Plan Update 5.3.3 Runway Design Code .............................................................................. 5-5 5.3.4 Airport Reference Code ........................................................................... 5-6 5.3.5 Runway Length Analysis ......................................................................... 5-7 5.3.6 Declared Distances ................................................................................. 5-9 5.3.7 Runway Width Analysis ......................................................................... 5-10 5.3.8 Runway Design Standards .................................................................... 5-10 5.3.9 Runway Designations ............................................................................ 5-12 5.3.10 Runway Pavement Condition and Strength ............................................. 5-14 5.3.11 Runway Markings and Lighting .............................................................. 5-15 5.3.12 Taxiway and Taxilane Standards ........................................................... 5-15 5.3.13 Taxiway Design .................................................................................... 5-17 5.3.14 Taxiway Conditions Assessment ............................................................ 5-17 5.3.15 Taxiway Markings and Lighting .............................................................. 5-20 5.3.16 Additional Taxiways .............................................................................. 5-20 5.3.17 Apron Pavement ................................................................................... 5-20 5.3.18 Navigational Aids .................................................................................. 5-20 5.3.19 Weather Equipment .............................................................................. 5-21 5.4 Landside ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1.1 Goals and Objectives
    Chapter One INVENTORY Rock Hill/York County Airport (Bryant Field – UZA) (the Airport) is a publicly owned general aviation facility located approximately four miles north of the central business district of the City of Rock Hill, South Carolina (the City, refer to Figures 1-1 and 1-2, pages 1-2 and 1-3). The Airport is owned and operated by the City of Rock Hill. In order to establish a planning guideline for future airport development, the owner has contracted this Airport Master Plan (Master Plan), which will satisfy future aviation demand in a financially feasible manner. 1.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Airport Master Plan presents both short- and long-term development for the Airport and graphically displays and reports the data and logic upon which the Master Plan is based. The goal of the Master Plan is to provide guidelines for future airport development, which will satisfy aviation demand in a cost-effective, feasible manner, while resolving aviation, environmental, and socioeconomic issues of the community. Objectives are attainable targets that are action-oriented and designed to address specific elements consistent with attainment of the goal. The objectives for Rock Hill/York County Airport (Bryant Field) are based on an initial evaluation of the Airport and its surrounding environs and meetings with Airport staff, City staff, South Carolina Department of Commerce Division of Aeronautics (SCDOA), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). As information is developed during data gathering efforts, objectives for the Airport Master
    [Show full text]
  • B&W+Foreign+Military+PDF.Pdf
    A00001 10476 Northrop F‐5A Greek AF 341 Mira 73 A00002 1400 Northrop F‐5A Greek AF 341 Mira 73 A00003 949 Sikorsky H‐19D Greek AF 357 Mira 70 A00004 29876 Lockheed T‐33A Greek AF 74 A00005 FAM6023 Douglas C‐47 Mexican AF 72 A00006 TTD6021 Douglas C‐47 Mexican AF 72 A00007 TPH‐02 Bell 212 Mexican AF Pres.Flight 72 A00008 TP‐0207 BN2 Islander Mexican AF 72 A00009 TP10014 Douglas DC‐6 Mexican AF 6 Gr Aereo 72 A00010 21193 Northrop F‐5A Turkish AF 192 Filo 73 A00011 21207 Northrop RF‐5A Turkish AF 192 Filo 73 A00012 1625 Cessna U‐17B Thai Army 74 A00013 300/A BAC‐167 Singapore AF 130 Sqn 73 A00014 301/B BAC‐167 Singapore AF 130 Sqn 73 A00015 302/C BAC‐167 Singapore AF 130 Sqn 73 A00016 127/H SIAI SF‐260M Singapore AF 172 Sqn 73 A00017 516 Hawker Hunter T.75 Singapore AF 140/141 Sqn 73 A00018 126/G SIAI SF‐260M Singapore AF 172 Sqn 73 A00019 7928 Bell 47G Greek AF 357 Mira 70 A00020 25971 Cessna T‐37C Greek AF 361 Mira 70 A00021 25973 Cessna T‐37C Greek AF 361 Mira 70 A00022 EB+121 Lockheed F‐104G German AF AKG52 wfu Erding 72 A00023 EB+399 Lockheed T‐33A German AF AKG52 displ Uetersen 71 A00024 JD+105 NA F‐86E German AF JG74 Munich Museum 72 A00025 JB+110 NA F‐86E German AF JG72 displ Uetersen 71 A00026 JA+332 NA F‐86E German AF JG71 wfu Buchel 72* A00027 EB+231 Republic RF‐84F German AF AKG52 displNeuaubing 72 A00028 ..+105 Republic F‐84F German AF displ Erding A00029 BR+239 Fiat G‐91R German AF displ Uetersen 71 A00030 KM+103 Transall German AF ferry serial A00031 PA+142 Sud Alouette II German Army HFB1 64 A00032 AA+014 Fouga Magister German
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Flight Operations Rules for Common Carriers
    AIAA SciTech Forum 10.2514/6.2018-1616 8–12 January 2018, Kissimmee, Florida 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Extraordinary Care: A History of Flight Operations Rules for Common Carriers Donald L Wood1 and Timothy T Takahashi2 Arizona State Universtiy, Tempe, AZ, 85287-6106 In this work, we cover how the legal concept of the “Common Carrier” applies to commercial aircraft design and operations. We trace the history of this concept from antiquity to the present, specifically detailing the change history regarding Federal Regulation of Aircraft. We note that the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938 was a milestone event; since these laws were amended, scheduled commercial aircraft (both design and operation) regulations became more stringent than those used in “general aviation.” We also document how the focus of litigation and additional regulation has shifted from fundamental performance and safety (fuel reserves, runway requirements, and obstacle avoidance) to protecting the passenger from incidental injury (trips, slips and falls). I. Introduction OMMERCIAL AIR TRAVEL plays a substantial role in United States political economy. Beginning with C rickety, canvas wrapped, wood and wire contraptions, commercial passenger aircraft have matured into the high performance jets that are capable of crossing vast oceans in a matter of hours. Fare paying customers enjoy the convenience offered by this expedient and safe form of travel by the millions each year. In fact, the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics noted that 2015 resulted in nearly 900 million passengers traveling by commercial air carriers, a new all-time high. This relatively safe travel environment is the result of many a lesson learned in the air travel industry, often at the cost of bloodshed and innocent lives lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of a Feasibility Study for an Advanced Avionics Flight Test Aircraft
    MCS-02526 CORNELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY, INC. BUFFALO,Q NEW YORK 14221 FINAL REPORT OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR AN ADVANCED AVIONICS FLIGHT TEST AIRCRAFT Robert 6. Kidder NOVEMBER 1970 CONTRACT NO. NAS9-10987 CAL Report No. VI-2973-F-1 Prepared For: NASA MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER HOUSTON, TEXAS i w MCS-02526 COR NELL A ER ONA UT ICA L LA BOR AT OR Y , INC . Flight Research Department FINAL REPORT OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR AN ADVANCED AVIONICS FLIGHT TEST ALR- CRAFT Prepare d by: 4x 1- R. C. Kidder Pr inc ipal Investigator Approved by: Assistant Head Flight Research Dept. November 1970 SUMMARY An engineering study has been performed from which recom- mendations were generated for modification of an existing aircraft to a con- figuration that will be suitable for flight demonstration of the integrated elez- tronics system that is intended to be used for the guidance and control of the reusable space shuttle vehicle. From a wide variety of aircraft initially examined, fifteen were selected and examined in further depth for compli- ance with the program requirements. After seven weeks investigation, the candidate aircraft were reduced to three, the Convair 580, Lockheed P3D, and the Lockheed C-130. Cost estimates were prepared for the conversion of these three candidate aircraft to the configuration of the Space Shuttle Vehicle Electronics Test Aircraft, After review of the conversion costs, the sponsor selected the C-130E aircraft as the one most suitable to the mis- sion requirements. A detailed specification has been written which sets forth the requirements for conversion of the selected aircraft to the desired elec- tronic test bed configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Empennage Statistics and Sizing Methods for Dorsal Fins
    AERO_TN_TailSizing_13-04-15 Aircraft Design and Systems Group (AERO) Department of Automotive and Aeronautical Engineering Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Berliner Tor 9 D - 20099 Hamburg Empennage Statistics and Sizing Methods for Dorsal Fins Priyanka Barua Tahir Sousa Dieter Scholz 2013-04-15 Technical Note AERO_TN_TailSizing_13-04-15 Dokumentationsblatt 1. Berichts-Nr. 2. Auftragstitel 3. ISSN / ISBN AERO_TN_TailSizing Airport2030 --- (Effizienter Flughafen 2030) 4. Sachtitel und Untertitel 5. Abschlussdatum Empennage Statistics and 2013-04-15 Sizing Methods for Dorsal Fins 6. Ber. Nr. Auftragnehmer AERO_TN_TailSizing 7. Autor(en) (Vorname, Name, E-Mail) 8. Förderkennzeichen Priyanka Barua 03CL01G Tahir Sousa 9. Kassenzeichen Dieter Scholz 810302101951 10. Durchführende Institution (Name, Anschrift) 11. Berichtsart Aircraft Design and Systems Group (AERO) Technische Niederschrift Department Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau 12. Berichtszeitraum Fakultät Technik und Informatik 2012-10-15 – 2013-04-15 Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (HAW) Berliner Tor 9, D - 20099 Hamburg 13. Seitenzahl 145 14. Auftraggeber (Name, Anschrift) 15. Literaturangaben Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 81 Heinemannstraße 2, D - 53175 Bonn - Bad Godesberg 16. Tabellen 48 Projektträger Jülich Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 17. Bilder Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D - 52438 Jülich 76 18. Zusätzliche Angaben Sprache: Englisch. URL: http://Reports_at_AERO.ProfScholz.de 19. Kurzfassung Dieser Bericht beschreibt verbesserte Methoden zur Abschätzung von Parametern des Höhen- und Seitenleitwerks. Weiterhin werden parameter der Rückenflossen aus den Parametern des a aSeitenleitwerks abgeleitet um den Vorentwurf zu unterstützen. Basis sind Statistiken aufbauend auf aDaten, die aus Dreiseitenansichten gewonnen werden. Die betrachteten Parameter sind Leitwerksvolumenbeiwert,a Streckung, Zuspitzung, Pfeilwinkel, relative Profildicke für Höhen- und Seitenleitwerk,a sowie die Profiltiefe und Spannweite von Höhen- und Seitenruder.
    [Show full text]
  • January 1981 M Ii I COMMUTER AIRLINES at BOSTON LOGAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
    FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION LABORATORY REPORT R 81-1 COMMUTER AIRLINES AT BOSTON LOGAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: 1973-1981 R. A. Ausrotas & M. R. Godly A A January 1981 m ii i COMMUTER AIRLINES AT BOSTON LOGAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: 1973-1981 FTL Report 81-1 Raymond A. Ausrotas Martin A. Godly January 1981 Flight Transportation Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This analysis of the commuter markets at Logan International Airport was performed under the direction of Massport as part of the continuing monitoring of the effects of deregulation on air travel at Boston. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance and editorial advice provided by Joe Brevard, Heather Conover, Norman Faramelli, and Dick Marchi of Massport. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Dynamics of the Commuter Airline Industry 3 3. Market Analysis 10 4. Commuter Aircraft: Old and New 21 5. Summary and Recommendations 26 Appendices 1. Boston Markets City Code 28 2. Boston Commuter Code 29 3. Aircraft Code 30 4. Detailed Market Descriptions 31 5. Selected Data on Ten Largest Boston Commuter Markets 103 1. INTRODUCTION The adequacy of air transportation in New England has been the subject of intermittent debate-over the last twenty years-,cuhninating in the Civil Aeronautics Board's 1970-1974 "New England Service Investi- gation" (Docket 22973). Spurred on by Senate hearings on the "Adequacy of Northern New Ergland Air Service" (1971) in particular and by Senator Norris Cotton of New Hampshire in general, in 1974 the Board certificated Air New England as a local service carrier. It was the first certification of a commuter airline by the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-1982
    ... ...... :,tt ·.. .~ ... : · -~~- :·.=. .. ·' .·.' ...' .,~ -.. ·. • .:. ~ . i ~ -,, r'J.d, . -.-_,...)!_ r ' • ·• ·.·, ·, ; -·'.~. ... • • :.r --------------~-- ~ - ';'l~i.. ' f(";'' .:~_,• '-· -"~' · '..:,o···':..·: ~-'-'-""'-"-" ' '----'-' -'--------= Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997 ·3289 $9.95 Per Copy Copyright, August 1982 by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429-4600 Director Research Center Virginia C. Lopez Manager Economic Data Service Janet Martinusen Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty Acknowledgments Battelle Memorial Institute Civil Aeronautics Board Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Civil Aviation Organization McGraw-Hill Publications Company National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Industrial Economics) Defense (Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operations and Reports; Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration) 4 Contents 6 Foreword
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Facts and Figures 1980/1981
    AEROSPACE FACTS AND FIGURES 1980/1981 AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. 1725 DeSales Street. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Published by Aviation Week & Space 7ichnology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997-3289 $6.95 Per Copy Copyright, August 1980 by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 De Sales Street, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 347-2315 Director Allen H. Skaggs Chief Statistician Janet Martinusen Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty Acknowledgments Civil Aeronautics Board Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Civil Aviation Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis) Defense (Comptroller, Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration) Contents Page 6 FOREWORD 8 AEROSPACE SUMMARY 30 AIRCRAFT PRODUCTION 47 MISSILE PROGRAMS 57 SPACE PROGRAMS 73 AIR TRANSPORTATION 90 HELICOPTER TRANSPORTATION 99 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 110 FOREIGN TRADE 124 EMPLOYMENT 134 FINANCE 145 GLOSSARY 152 INDEX FOREWORD This 28th edition of Aerospace Facts and Figures tells the statistical story of the aerospace industry in 1979, a year of heightened performance in virtually every category of industry activity. The industry closed out the decade of the 1970s on a high note, reaching new peaks in sales, backlog, earnings, exports and contribution to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Circular 150/5300-13, Airport Design
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration AIRPORT DESIGN / INCORPORATES CHANGES 1 THRU 15 / AC: 150/5300-13 Date: 9/29/89 Advisory Circular 3/28/07 AC 150/5300-13 CHG 11 CONTENTS Paragraph Page Chapter 1. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITION OF TERMS 1. GENERAL .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 3. RELATED/REFERENCED READING MATERIAL.................................................................................................. 3 4. AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE (ARC)....................................................................................................................... 5 5. AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... 5 6. MODIFICATION OF AIRPORT DESIGN STANDARDS TO MEET LOCAL CONDITIONS ............................... 5 7. NOTICE TO THE FAA OF AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................... 5 8. NOTICE TO THE FAA OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... 6 9. FAA STUDIES.............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Smell of Kerosene a Test Pilot’S Odyssey
    The Smell of Kerosene A Test Pilot’s Odyssey NASA SP 4108 By Donald L. Mallick with Peter W. Merlin The Smell of Kerosene A Test Pilot’s Odyssey The Smell of Kerosene tells the dramatic story of a NASA research pilot who logged over 11,000 flight hours in more than 125 types of aircraft. Donald Mallick gives the reader fascinating first- hand descriptions of his early naval flight training, carrier operations, and his research flying career with NASA and its predecessor agency, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). Mallick joined the NACA as a research pilot at the Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory at Hampton, Virginia, where he flew modified helicopters and jets, and witnessed the NACA’s evolution into the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. After transferring to the NASA Flight Research Center (now NASA Dryden Flight Research Center) at Edwards, California, he became involved with projects that further pushed the boundaries of aerospace technology. These included the giant delta-winged XB-70 supersonic research airplane, the wingless M2-F1 lifting body vehicle, and the triple-sonic YF-12 Blackbird. Mallick also test flew the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV) and helped develop techniques used in training astronauts to land on the Moon. This book puts the reader in the pilot’s seat for a “day at the office” unlike any other. Wings of Gold The Smell of Kerosene: A Test Pilot’s Odyssey i Wings of Gold NASA SP 4108 The Smell of Kerosene: A Test Pilot’s Odyssey By Donald L. Mallick with Peter W.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulfstream's G700 Takes Flight
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.49 | No.3 $9.00 MARCH 2020 | ainonline.com « Introduced publicly at the NBAA-BACE show in October, Gulfstream’s long-anticipated new flagship made its first flight on February 14. Based on the G650, the G700 will be the largest and most sophisticated Gulfstream, ever. Aircraft SJ30i deliveries to start next year page 20 Avionics Garmin GFC 600H ready to deliver page 48 Gulfstream’s G700 takes flight Airshows Organizers cancel next by Chad Trautvetter month’s ABACE page 21 The new Gulfstream G700 achieved first Dynamics, and the innovation of the Gulf- operation, field performance, and climb flight on February 14, departing Gulfstream stream team,” said Gulfstream president performance; T4, environmental control Rotorcraft Aerospace’s headquarters at Savannah/Hil- Mark Burns. system, mechanical systems, flight into Bristow and ERA merge ton Head International Airport at 1:19 p.m. The G700 was introduced as the com- known icing, and cooling/vent; T5, avionics and landing back at the Georgia airport pany’s latest flagship in October at NBAA- and level-D sim data. A sixth G700 will also page 16 two hours and 32 minutes later. Piloted BACE, where Gulfstream displayed a serve as a production test aircraft. by Jake Howard and Eric Holmberg, with full-scale cabin mockup and showed video Powered by Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 flight-test engineer Bill Osborne, the first of the first test aircraft taxiing under its own engines, the Mach-0.90, 6,400-nm G700 flight-test G700—T1—operated on a 30/70 power. Five flight-test aircraft have already features a five-living-area cabin with 20 blend of sustainable aviation fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cochise County Airport Working Paper 2 January, 2014 (PDF)
    AiRPORT MAsteR PLAN Working Paper No. 2 COCHISE COUNTY AIRPORT WILLCOX, ARIZonA | JAnuARY 2014 Chapter Three Facility Requirements TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1 INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 3-3 3.2 DESIGN STANDARDS ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3-3 3.3 AIRFIELD CAPACITY ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 3-5 3.4 AIRSIDE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................ ....................... 3-6 3.4.1 RUNWAY LENGTH ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 3-6 3.4.2 RUNWAY ORIENTATION ................................ ................................ ................................ 3-9 3.4.3 RUNWAY WIDTH ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 3-10 3.4.4 RUNWAY PAVEMENT STRENGTH ................................ ................................ .................. 3-11 3.4.5 TAXIWAY AND TAXILANE REQUIREMENTS ................................ ................................ ..... 3-11 3.4.6 AIRCRAFT APRON ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 3-12 3.4.7 INSTRUMENT AIDS TO NAVIGATION ................................ ................................ .............
    [Show full text]