Child Maintenance: the Write-Off of Arrears on Child Support Agency Cases (UK)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Child Maintenance: the Write-Off of Arrears on Child Support Agency Cases (UK) BRIEFING PAPER Number 7776, 27 January 2021 Child maintenance: The By David Foster, Philip write-off of arrears on Child Loft Support Agency cases (UK) Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Policy development 3. Procedure: parent with care 4. Procedure: Government 5. How is the write-off progressing? 6. Northern Ireland www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Child maintenance: The write-off of arrears on Child Support Agency cases (UK) Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 1.1 The child support schemes 4 1.2 The 2018 write-off programme 4 2. Policy development 5 2.1 2012-2017 Strategy 5 2.2 2018 strategy 6 2.3 2018 regulations 7 3. Procedure: parent with care 8 3.1 Which cases are involved? 8 3.2 Informing the parent with care of a decision to write-off arrears 9 3.3 Representations by parents with care & non-resident parent 9 What is the timescale for responding? 10 3.4 What happens if the parent with care asks the CSA/CMS to collect a debt? 11 3.5 How does the CSA/CMS evaluate “collectability?” 11 3.6 Can part-payments be accepted? 12 3.7 What if a case involved arrears owed to both the Government and a parent with care? 13 3.8 Complaints 13 3.9 DWP flowchart of the write-off process 14 4. Procedure: Government 15 4.1 Why are there arrears owed to the DWP? 15 4.2 How are the arrears being written off? 15 5. How is the write-off progressing? 16 5.1 Parent with care representation 16 5.2 Non-resident parent representation 17 5.3 CSA debt written off 17 5.4 National Audit Office commentary 18 Complaints 19 6. Northern Ireland 20 6.1 Arrears 20 6.2 Policy background 20 6.3 Process 21 Cover page image copyright: Pixabay website; photographer Pezibear – Free for commercial use, no attribution required 3 Commons Library Briefing, 27 January 2021 Summary This briefing describes the UK Government’s policy to write-off arrears The separate arising from the 1993 and 2003 child maintenance schemes. These scheme in Northern schemes are closed to new applicants and ongoing maintenance cases Ireland is described have been transferred to the 2012 scheme. in section 6. Post-2018 Write-off policy Following a consultation, in 2018 the UK Government announced a new policy to bring the estimated £3.7 billion of child maintenance arrears accumulated under the 1993 and 2003 schemes within scope of a write-off programme. Of the estimated £3.7 billion, the Government calculated £2.5 billion was owed to parents with care (c. 970,000 cases) and £1.2 billion was owed to the Government (c. 320,000 cases). In deciding to take this approach, the Government said arrears had accumulated due to the “significant policy, operational and IT issues” of the 1993 and 2003 schemes. The consultation document also highlighted the costs associated with collecting the arrears and maintaining them on Child Support Agency (CSA) IT systems,, and the relatively low level of collection expected (around £0.1 to £0.6 billion). The resulting Strategy said that the Government would-write off in full the £1.2 billion owed to the Government. Between 18 December 2018 and 30 September 2020, around 579,500 cases with non-paying historical debt have had the debt adjusted or written off. System records showed these had a total debt value of £1,935.5 million, of which £853 million was owed to government only (DWP, CSA: September 2020, January 2021). Writing off arrears owed to Parents with care In December 2018, the CSA/CMS began writing to eligible parents with care to ask them if they wanted a last attempt to be made to try and collect the debt owed to them. The DWP said that by September 2020 all eligible persons on the CSA computer system had completed the care with representation process and 89% of contacted parents with care either did not respond to the letter or told the CSA that they did not want them to collect the debt. By the end of September 2020, 112,100 parents with a case on the CMS system have also been contacted (DWP, CSA: September 2020, January 2021). Where the parent with care requests the CSA/CMS collects the debt, the service conducts checks to establish whether there is a realistic chance of its collection. If there is, the service contacts the non-resident parent. By March 2020, all 13,700 cases on CSA systems had completed the non-resident parent representation process and 98% of these cases were transferred to the CMS to collect the debt. These figures do not include cases which were already on the CMS system before December 2018. At September 2020, 17,800 CSA cases already held on CMS systems had started the non-resident parent representation process and 82% of these cases have been transferred for on-going attempts to collect the debt (DWP, CSA: September 2020, January 2021). 4 Child maintenance: The write-off of arrears on Child Support Agency cases (UK) 1. Introduction 1.1 The child support schemes There are currently three statutory child support schemes operating in Great Britain under the Child Support Act 1991: • 2012 scheme (also known as CS3) is the current scheme and open to new applicants. It is administered by the Child Maintenance Service (CMS); • 1993 and 2003 schemes – these are closed to new applicants. All cases with ongoing maintenance liabilities have been transferred to the 2012 scheme. Only “arrears-only” cases continue to operate on the legacy scheme although, as this briefing explains in more detail, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is implementing a large-scale write-off of arrears that accrued under these schemes. These legacy schemes are administered by the Child Support Agency (CSA). Box 1: Child maintenance terminology Below is a list of common terminology on child maintenance employed under the Child Support Act 1991 (the 1991 Act) and in CMS literature: • Non-resident parent (“Paying parent”): a parent of the child who does not live with the child. • Parent with care (“Receiving parent”): the person with whom the child has their home and who usually provides day-to-day care of the child. The parent with care does not have to be a parent of the child or have parental responsibility for them • Qualifying child: the child for whom child maintenance is payable. • Relevant child (or “relevant other child”): a child other than a Qualifying Child for whom Child Benefit is payable to the non-resident parent (or their partner). • Child in Scotland/Child Applicant: in Scotland, a child aged 12-19 may apply for maintenance if they are in full-time, non-advanced education or approved training; • Duty to Maintain: Section 1 of the 1991 Act states that “each parent of the Qualifying Child is responsible for maintaining [them]” and “where a maintenance assessment made under this Act requires the making of periodical payments, it shall be the duty of the absent parent with respect to whom the assessment was made to make those payments”. • Gross weekly income: the non-resident parent’s income calculated as a weekly amount before any deductions for tax but after any contributions to approved personal or occupational pension schemes have been made. • Direct Pay: where the CMS calculates the rate of maintenance, and payments are made directly between parents. • “Collect and Pay”: where the CMS calculates, collects and passes on payments between parents. • Child Maintenance Group (CMG): the post-2012 successor to the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission. 1.2 The 2018 write-off programme Following a consultation, in 2018 the UK Government published a new Compliance and Arrears strategy, which set out plans to write-off arrears arising from the 1993 and 2003 child maintenance schemes, organised through the CSA. Child maintenance cases with ongoing maintenance claims previously collected by the CSA have been transferred to the CMS. This briefing provides information on this policy, including its development and implementation to date. 5 Commons Library Briefing, 27 January 2021 2. Policy development 2.1 2012-2017 Strategy In 2013, the DWP document, Preparing the future, tackling the past, set out the child maintenance arrears and compliance strategy for 2012- 2017. The Strategy included an estimate that around £3.8 billion was owed in arrears on CSA cases by 2012.1 The Department said its “aim [was] to collect as much as we can”. It added, however, that that older debt was “harder and more expensive” to collect and the collection of money owed to children with ongoing maintenance arrangements would be its priority.2 The 2012 Strategy was criticised by several organisations, including the single-parents charity Gingerbread and the National Audit Office (NAO), who both said the Government had not allocated sufficient resources to recover arrears accumulated under the 1993 and 2003 schemes.3 Limited powers to write-off arrears Before 2012, the DWP has no power to write-off child maintenance arrears; the only option was to “suspend” their collection indefinitely. Legislative changes that came into force in October 2012, through amendments of the Child Support Act 1991 , introduced the power to write-off debts but only in certain prescribed circumstances.4 As the DWP explained, these were that: • the receiving parent (or child in Scotland, who can apply for maintenance in their own right) has requested that they no longer wish the arrears to be collected. • the receiving parent (or child in Scotland) has died. • the paying parent died before 25 January 2010, or there is no further action that can be taken to recover arrears from their estate.
Recommended publications
  • Department for Communities Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19
    Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019 Annex includes Child Maintenance Service Client Funds Account 2018–19 Department for Communities Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2019 Laid before the Northern Ireland Assembly by the Department of Finance under section 10(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act (Northern Ireland) 2001 5 July 2019 Department for Communities Annual Report & Accounts (2018–2019) iii © Crown Copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Departmental Resource Accounts & Finance Systems Level 5, Causeway Exchange 1–7 Bedford Street Belfast BT2 7EG Telephone: 028 90 512644 Email: [email protected] This publication is also available to download from our website at: www.communities-ni.gov.uk iv Department for Communities Annual Report & Accounts (2018–2019) Contents Performance Report 1-36 Accountability Report 37-98 – Corporate Governance Report 39-64 – Remuneration and Staff Report 65-84 – Assembly Accountability and Audit Report 85-98 Certificate of the Comptroller and Auditor General 99-106 Financial Statements 107-186 – Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure 109 – Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Child Maintenance 2012 Scheme Early Progress
    Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Work & Pensions Child maintenance 2012 scheme: early progress HC 173 SESSION 2014-15 20 JUNE 2014 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 820 employees. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of £1.1 billion in 2013. Department for Work & Pensions Child maintenance 2012 scheme: early progress Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 19 June 2014 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Amyas Morse Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 17 June 2014 HC 173 | £10.00 This report examines the Department for Work & Pensions’ early progress in the roll-out of the 2012 child maintenance scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Department for Work and Pensions Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19
    Annual Report & Accounts 2018-2019 & Accounts Report Annual Annual Report & Accounts 2018-2019 Department For Work & Pensions Work For Department HC 2281 Department for Work and Pensions Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19 for the year ended 31 March 2019 Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 6 (4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Annual Report presented to the House of Commons by command for Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 27 June 2019 HC 2281 © Crown Copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/opengovernment-licence/ version/3 Where we have identifed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available on our website at: www.gov.uk/offcial-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Finance Director General’s Offce 5th Floor, Caxton House 6-12 Tothill Street London SW1H 9NA ISBN 978-1-5286-1447-4 CCS0519178452 06/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fbre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offce Contents 3 Contents Performance report Secretary of State’s foreword 6 Permanent Secretary’s overview 8 Performance overview 12 Performance analysis 21 Accountability report Corporate governance report 96 Lead Non-executive member’s report 96 Governance
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Access Request Guide (SARG) Page 1 of 104
    Subject Access Request Guide (SARG) Page 1 of 104 Subject Access Request Guide (SARG) (A guide to handling requests for personal information held by DWP from customers, staff or third party representatives) Contents About this guide Purpose Contact details Introduction What is a data subject? Identifying a SAR: What is a Subject Access Request (SAR)? Sample questions about what is a SAR – with answers Request made verbally quoting the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 or the Equality Act 2010 Request made by email Personal information held by other government departments or bodies Personal information held by Child Maintenance Group (CMG) Requests for information held by organisations providing services to DWP (Providers) Requests for information covered by normal business made by: • customer • a solicitor/third party • in relation to Appeals Checklist of DPO responsibilities during the Subject Access Request Process Publicising your role Time limits Effective Date of a Subject Access Request Charges http://intralink/1/corp/sites/infodir/kimd/dataprotection/dp/sars/DWP_D028720.asp 06/07/2015 Subject Access Request Guide (SARG) Page 2 of 104 Repeat requests Ownership: Ownership of the Subject Access Request Response required from receiving Business Unit only Transfer of SAR to correct DPO Subject Access Requests for Personal Injury Compensation Records Initial Action: Confirming identity Providing the right information Contact via telephone for clarification of minor issues Subject Access Requests made by a DWP customer or appointee/Power
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography All the reports by House of Commons (HC) select committees listed below were published by the Stationery Office or its predecessor organisation, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, during the period of the parliamentary session indicated (for example, ‘HC 2006–07’). Governmental success and failure Graham T. Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1971) Richard Bellamy and Antonino Palumbo, eds, From Government to Governance (Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate 2010) Mark Bovens and Paul ’t Hart, Understanding Policy Fiascoes (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1996) Mark Bovens, Paul ’t Hart and B. Guy Peters, eds, Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis (Cheltenham, Glos.: Edward Elgar, 2001) Annika Brändström, Fredrik Bynander and Paul ’t Hart, “Governing by Looking Back: Historical Analogies and Crisis Management”, Public Administration 82:1 (2004) 191–210 David Braybrooke and Charles E. Lindblom, A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963) Martha Derthick, New Towns in Town: Why a Federal Program Failed (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1972) Norman Dixon, On the Psychology of Military Incompetence (London: Jonathan Cape, 1976) bibliographY William D. Eggers and John O’Leary, If We Can Put a Man on the Moon . .: Getting Big Things Done in Government (Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, 2009) Ewen Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn Jr and Christopher Pollitt, eds,The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) Matthew Flinders, “The Politics of Public-Private Partnerships”,British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7:2 (2005) 215–39 Pat Gray and Paul ’t Hart, eds, Public Policy Disasters in Western Europe (London: Routledge, 1998) Michael Hill, The Public Policy Process, 5th edn (Harlow, Essex: Pearson, 2009) Albert Hirschman, “The Principle of the Hiding Hand”,Public Interest, no.
    [Show full text]
  • ADM Abbreviations
    A#& A''reviations AD& abbreviations ADM Abbreviation (ull )hase AA Attendance Allowance .AA/ .Attendance Allowance” as defned in 1eg 2 of the 23 1egs A411 All -or56related requirements AD3 Actual Date of 3onfnement A9:* Ar8ed $orces independence !a+8ent A;* Agent ;ead *rocess art article(s) <A <ereavement Allowance <3 <eneft 3a! <=> <est =tart >rant <*T <ereavement *a+8ent 3A 3arer?s Allowance 3D* 3hild Disabilit+ *a+8ent 3@< 3hild <eneft 3MD 3hild Maintenance Deduction 3M> 3hild Maintenance >rou! 3M= 3hild Maintenance =ervice 3*en 3ivil *enalt+ 3=M 3hild su!!ort 8aintenance 3T3 3hild taA credit 3TM 3ontribution to Maintenance 34* 3old 4eather *a+8ent D3T Direct 3redit Trans$er D@ Depart8ent of @ealth D;A Disabilit+ ;iving Allowance DM Decision Ma5er ED* Enhanced Disabilit+ *remiu8 EEA European Economic Area B=A B8!loy8ent and =u!!ort Allowance B2 European 2nion B43 BA!ected 4eek o$ 3onfnement 9A= 9inancial Assistance =cheme 91M 9lat 1ate Maintenance 9tT 9irst-tier Tribunal 9/T 9ull-ti8e 9TB 9ull-ti8e education 9T* 9iAed ter8 !eriod >A >uardian?s Allowance >< >reat <ritain >M* >uaranteed Mini8u8 *ension >* >eneral !ractitioner >1< >raduated 1etirement <eneft >T1D9 >ren$ell To-er 1esidentsC Discretionar+ 9und @< @ousing beneft @33 @ousing 3osts 3ontribution @3B @ousing 3osts Element @3* @ealth care !rofessional @M13 @er MaDest+?s 1evenue and 3ustoms @O @ome O$fce @* @ealth *rofessional :D< :ndustrial Death <eneft :9M :88ediate 9a8il+Member ::< :ndustrial :nDuries <eneft ::D< :ndustrial :nDuries Disablement <eneft E=A Jobseeker?s Allowance
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Reform – Lessons Learned
    Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Work & Pensions Welfare reform – lessons learned HC 77 SESSION 2015-16 29 MAY 2015 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 820 employees. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of £1.1 billion in 2013. Department for Work & Pensions Welfare reform – lessons learned Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 27 May 2015 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 26 May 2015 HC 77 | £10.00 This report examines lessons from the Department’s implementation of recent welfare reforms. © National Audit Office 2015 The material featured in this document is subject to National Audit Office (NAO) copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Maintenance: Income in the CMS Formula (Including Why Gross Income Is Used, and Annual Reviews)
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7771, 19 December 2018 Child maintenance: income in the CMS formula By Tim Jarrett (including why gross income is used, and annual reviews) Contents: 1. The different statutory child maintenance schemes 2. Quick introduction to child maintenance terminology 3. Why income is important for the statutory child maintenance scheme 4. Gross weekly income – what it does, and doesn’t, include 5. The use of gross, rather than net, income in the CMS formula 6. How the CMS collates income data for the initial calculation 7. The CMS’s annual review of income data 8. When does – and doesn’t – a change in income have to be reported 9. Why only the non-resident parent’s income is taken into account 10. Why 25% is the threshold for a change in income used to trigger a recalculation 11. Pension payments and gross weekly income www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Contents Summary 3 1. The different statutory child maintenance schemes 4 2. Quick introduction to child maintenance terminology 4 3. Why income is important for the statutory child maintenance scheme 5 4. Gross weekly income – what it does, and doesn’t, include 5 5. The use of gross, rather than net, income in the CMS formula 6 5.1 The rationale for the change from net to gross income 6 5.2 Adjustment of the formula to account for the move to gross income 6 5.3 Scope to review the rates 7 6. How the CMS collates income data for the initial calculation 8 6.1 Historic income data from HM Revenue and Customs 8 6.2 Current income data from the non-resident parent 9 6.3 No income data 9 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Fife Child Poverty Action Report 2020
    visit our.fife.scotand get involved Fife Child Poverty Action Report 2020 Fife Partnership Creating a Fairer Fife Contents Executive Foreword 2 Child Poverty in Fife 3 What’s the story in Fife? 3 The Priority Groups in Fife 4 How are we doing? 6 Governance & Reporting 7 Our response to the Coronavirus Pandemic 8 Our Child Poverty Action Plan 12 Reviewing our Plan 12 Progress with our Plan 13 Case Study: Café Inc 24 Case Study: Making it Work for Lone Parent Families 25 References 26 Appendices 1. Child Poverty Action Plan 2. Action Rationale 1 Executive Foreword The Fife Child Poverty Action Report 2020 sets out how we, Fife Council and NHS Fife, are working together, along with our third sector partners, to tackle child poverty in the Kingdom of Fife. Last year we published Fife’s first Local Child Poverty Action Report. The world has changed a great deal since then with a global pandemic and nationwide lockdown resulting in the UK falling into recession. The pandemic has had an enormous impact on Fife’s communities. Many families have been thrown into hardship due to furlough or job loss, with their money needing to stretch further to cover increased costs of heating, electricity and food. Less affluent families are more likely to be impacted by the coronavirus and more likely to be missing opportunities to learn. There have been positives too, with neighbours and communities pulling together to support each other in new ways. It’s more important than ever to listen to families and understand their experiences in order to respond effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Maintenance: Calculations, Variations and Income (UK)
    By David Foster, Niamh Foley Child maintenance: 21 September 2021 Calculations, variations and income (UK) Summary 1 Child maintenance: An introduction 2 Separated families and maintenance arrangements: Statistics 3 The five rates: Summary 4 Defining income in the 2012 scheme 5 Reporting changes in income 6 Variations 7 FAQs on calculating income 8 “Additional income” under the different schemes 9 Poverty, welfare and child maintenance 10 Northern Ireland 11 Key contacts and resources Annex 1: The rates in detail commonslibrary.parliament.uk Number 7770 Child maintenance: Calculations, variations and income (UK) Disclaimer The Commons Library does not intend the information in our research publications and briefings to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. We have published it to support the work of MPs. You should not rely upon it as legal or professional advice, or as a substitute for it. We do not accept any liability whatsoever for any errors, omissions or misstatements contained herein. You should consult a suitably qualified professional if you require specific advice or information. Read our briefing ‘Legal help: where to go and how to pay’ for further information about sources of legal advice and help. This information is provided subject to the conditions of the Open Parliament Licence. Feedback Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in these publicly available briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated to reflect subsequent changes. If you have any comments on our briefings please email [email protected]. Please note that authors are not always able to engage in discussions with members of the public who express opinions about the content of our research, although we will carefully consider and correct any factual errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Maintenance: Fees, Enforcement and Arrears
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7774, 7 August 2020 Child Maintenance: Fees, By David Foster, Philip Loft, Rod McInnes enforcement and arrears Contents: 1. Arranging child maintenance and associated fees 2. Do parents comply with child maintenance arrangements? 3. Resolving arrears without CMS enforcement 4. Collecting and enforcing arrears 5. How often are collection and enforcement powers used? 6. Northern Ireland 7. Key contacts www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Child Maintenance: Fees, enforcement and arrears Contents Summary 4 1. Arranging child maintenance and associated fees 6 1.1 Terminology 6 1.2 Application fees 7 1.3 CMS: Collection fees 7 2. Do parents comply with child maintenance arrangements? 9 2.1 Compliance rates 9 Collect and Pay 9 Direct Pay 9 2.2 Total arrears 10 3. Resolving arrears without CMS enforcement 11 3.1 Person with Care’s lack of enforcement/collection powers 11 3.2 Arrears payment plans 12 3.3 If the Non-Resident Parent or their partner is in receipt of benefits 12 3.4 Part-payment plans as full and final settlements 13 3.5 Writing off arrears 14 4. Collecting and enforcing arrears 15 4.1 Introduction 15 Arrears accumulated off Collect and Pay 15 4.2 Collection actions 16 Deduction from earnings order (DEO) 16 Deduction from earnings request (DER) 17 Deduction order 17 Collection of assets from a deceased paying-parent’s estate 17 4.3 Enforcement actions 17 England, Wales and Scotland 18 England and Wales only 18 Scotland only 19 4.4 The possible return of using debt collection agencies 19 4.5 Financial Investigations Unit (FIU) 19 4.6 Complaints on child maintenance 20 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Support Agency: Implementation of the Child Support Reforms
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Child Support Agency: Implementation of the Child Support Reforms Thirty-seventh Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 June 2007 HC 812 [incorporating HC 1689-i of Session 2005-06] Published on 5 July 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and Poole North) Chris Bryant MP (Labour, Rhondda) Greg Clark MP (Conservative, Tunbridge Wells) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Mr John Healey MP (Labour, Wentworth) Ian Lucas MP (Labour, Wrexham) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Rt Hon Don Touhig MP (Labour, Islwyn) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Mr Iain Wright MP (Labour, Hartlepool) Derek Wyatt MP (Labour, Sittingbourne and Sheppey) The following were also Members of the Committee during the period of the enquiry: Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Helen Goodman MP (Labour, Bishop Auckland) Mr Sadiq Khan MP (Labour, Tooting) Sarah McCarthy-Fry MP (Labour, Portsmouth North) Kitty Ussher MP (Labour, Burnley) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]