DOCSLIB.ORG

Programming Responses for Intimate Partner Violence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programming Responses for Intimate Partner Violence Programming Responses for Intimate Partner Violence Lisa Heslop, Tim Kelly, Randal David, Katreena Scott Department of Justice Canada 2016 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Department of Justice Canada. For more information, please contact the Department of Justice Canada at: www.justice.gc.ca. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, 2017 ISBN 978-0-660-08236-3 Cat. No. J2-444/2017E-PDF Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank all those who provided information for this report, as well as those who reviewed drafts including provincial and territorial officials responsible for addressing intimate partner violence in their respective jurisdictions. The report was also reviewed by officials at the Department of Justice Canada in the Family, Children and Youth Section and the Research and Statistics Division. 3 Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................. 7 FINDINGS: PROGRAMMING RESPONSES FOR PERPETRATORS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE ....................................................................................................................................... 8 ALBERTA ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 BRITISH COLUMBIA ................................................................................................................................. 13 MANITOBA..................................................................................................................................................... 19 NEWFOUNDLAND/LABRADOR .......................................................................................................... 26 NEW BRUNSWICK ...................................................................................................................................... 29 NORTHWEST TERRITORIES ................................................................................................................. 34 NOVA SCOTIA .............................................................................................................................................. 37 NUNAVUT ....................................................................................................................................................... 43 ONTARIO ......................................................................................................................................................... 45 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND .................................................................................................................... 49 QUÉBEC ........................................................................................................................................................... 51 SASKATCHEWAN ....................................................................................................................................... 54 YUKON ............................................................................................................................................................. 60 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................................................... 63 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 66 APPENDIX A: SERVICES BY PROVINCE ............................................................................................. 66 APPENDIX B: KEY INFORMANTS ........................................................................................................... 74 4 INTRODUCTION The Department Justice Canada has a mandate to ensure a strong justice system response to family violence with appropriate criminal laws and procedures that ensure offender accountability. While there is no specific family violence offence in the Criminal Code, there is a wide range of offences related to the use of physical and sexual violence that are applicable within intimate partner relationships. Such offenses are referred to in this report as intimate partner violence (IPV). Criminal Code sentencing provisions consider IPV as an aggravating factor and have been designed to provide sanctions that are both punitive and rehabilitative. This report was undertaken for the Research and Statistics Division and the Family, Children and Youth Section of the Department of Justice Canada to provide a better understanding of the current landscape of programming aimed at perpetrators of IPV across Canada. The report also augments the now archived 2008 Directory of Canada’s Treatment Programs for Men Who Abuse Their Partners, one of a series of directories prepared under the Family Violence Initiative of the Government of Canada. CONTEXT Justice-linked intervention responses to IPV have been developed and implemented in virtually all regions of Canada. With respect to federal offenders, Correctional Service Canada (CSC) is legally mandated to provide programs and services that address offenders’ criminal behaviour and contribute to their successful transition into the community. For the majority of those convicted of IPV-related offending, services provided by CSC are augmented by community- based treatment. Many of Canada’s provinces and territories have developed IPV action plans, either current or in the recent past, that are relevant to understanding the nature of justice-linked IPV services. IPV action plans both reflect and direct the priorities for justice-linked services. Provincial and territorial action plans were most often developed as a result of strong advocacy by, and in close collaboration with, grassroots and community level organizations. As such, these plans reflect the unique culture, needs, and political landscapes of different regions of Canada. IPV action plans also substantially direct the funding and availability of justice-linked family violence services across the provinces and territories. For example, provincial level decisions around the existence and nature of designated IPV courts (or court processes) substantially influence how men interact with the criminal justice system (CJS) and therefore how they access services mandated by the CJS. In some provinces, the Justice of the Peace (JP) or Judge has the ability to order treatment prior to a conviction for an IPV-related offence, including addictions treatment. In these provinces, community-based services are designated to meet this need. In other cases, police identify high-risk families where no charges have been laid for intervention. In this context, community agencies have services to engage at-risk men in treatment. Other policy-related differences concern the integration (or lack of integration) of child protection, addictions treatment, and broader social services (e.g., housing) into justice-linked intervention responses to IPV. Although, recommendations with respect to therapeutic intervention or programming for offenders are generally a small part of IPV action plans, the overall priorities of 5 the action plan are directly reflected in the justice-linked services provided to address family violence. In this report, we begin our review of services in each province and territory with a brief description of the broader IPV action plans, legislation and/or processes that reflect and direct justice linked intervention services. Links to original documents are provided whenever possible. We recognize that this “top-down” organization can obscure the historic and ongoing influence of grassroots and community organizations on setting and implementing policy. Given the considerable body of implementation literature showing that with greater stakeholder involvement, IPV action plans are more comprehensive, stronger, and more likely to be implemented (Burby 2003; Hawking, Catalano and Arthur 2002), it is critical to remember the bidirectional influence of government
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quorum National and International News Clippings & Press Releases 9 May 2013
    Quorum National and International News clippings & press releases Providing members with information on policing from across Canada & around the world 9 May 2013 Canadian Association of Police Boards 157 Gilmour Street, Suite 302 Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0N8 Tel: 613|235|2272 Fax: 613|235|2275 www.capb.ca BRITISH COLUMBIA ................................................................................................ 4 New approach to mental health calls ............................................................................................................. 4 Victoria police to comply with results of excessive-force hearing, police board says ........... 7 Port Moody welcomes a new police chief .................................................................................................... 8 Former Port Moody Police Chief McCabe died Friday ............................................................................... 9 ALBERTA ................................................................................................................ 10 Alberta death review committee to examine family violence cases ................................................. 10 Police chief seeks protections for undercover officers ....................................................................... 11 RCMP changes allow Mounties to be more ‘nimble’ ........................................................................... 13 New bill to allow Alberta police, schools to share information to aid children ........................ 15 SASKATCHEWAN .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. I ti'-J <( ;~ I •Ot, I-ts~ I (~7l( I I I ~ HE HISTORY OF: I I CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE SERVICE CANADA 1 I - 1978- I I I I I I I Researched and edited by the Central Bureau of C.I.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement Information Management Study
    SPECIAL STUDY Law Enforcement Information Management Study Alison Brooks, Ph.D. IDC OPINION The objective of this study is to develop a common understanding of Canadian law enforcement's major investigative and operational systems (local, regional, provincial and federal levels) and to develop a common vision towards improved interoperability. To do so this study will provide: . An overview of the central challenges and obstacles to interoperable systems and a view into realistic best practices of interoperability between policing systems . An inventory and short description of the current major national, regional and provincial investigative and operational systems, smaller local systems in the policing community across Canada, and linkages between systems . An assessment of the current levels of interoperability . System-specific interoperability challenges . A delineation of the reasons for a lack of interoperability and an assessment of perceived legal constraints . Recommendations and next steps with respect to the overall state of system interoperability October 2014, IDC #CAN11W TABLE OF CONTENTS P. In This Study 1 Methodology 1 Executive Summary 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 4 Create a National Strategy 4 PIP 2.0/PRP 4 Standards/Interfaces 5 Mugshots 5 MCM 5 RMS 5 CAD 5 BI 5 Digital Evidence Management/ Business Intelligence 5 Situation Overview 6 Introduction 6 Background and a Case for Action 6 The Volume, Variety, Velocity and Value of Digital Evidence 6 Vast Differences in Technology Investments 7 Shifting Operational Paradigms in Policing 7 Technical Obsolescence of Critical Systems 8 Proprietary Systems 8 Lack of Standards 9 Financial Instability 9 System Interoperability Across the Justice Continuum (eDisclosure and DEMS) 9 System Inventory 10 Large National and Provincial Systems 12 Police Information Portal 12 Canadian Police Information Centre 13 Canadian Criminal Real Time Identification Services/Real-Time Identification Project 13 ©2014 IDC #CAN11W TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued P.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. FIRST REPORT AN DUCATION PROGRAM AND INTERAGENCY MODEL FOR POLICE OFFICERS ON ELDER ABUSE AND NEGLECT HV 8079 .225 E25 1993 FIRST REPORT AN 4DUCATION PROGRAM AND INTERAGENCY MODEL FOR POLICE OFFICERS ON ELDER ABUSE AND NEGLECT SOLICiTOR G!1NERAL CANADA JUN JUIN § 1997 soworrÊtni Gtemi.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Government Gouvernement 1*1 of Canada du Canada Canaa REPORT OF THE FEDERAL AD HOC INTERDEPARTMENTAL WORKING GROUP ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS ON CHILD SEX OFFENDERS SCREENING OF VOLUNTEERS
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the New Brunswick Police Commission
    Review of the New Brunswick Police Commission Submitted to: Minister of Public Safety October 1, 2019 By: Alphonse MacNeil Consulting Inc Table of Contents Part 1 – Introduction 3 1.1 The Reviewer 4 1.2 Review Methodology 5 1.3 Review Limitations 5 Part 2 - Policies, Practices and Procedures 6 2.1 Background 6 2.2 Interviews 8 2.3 Police Oversight 10 2.4 New Brunswick Police Commission 11 2.4.1 Governance 11 2.4.2 Establishment 11 2.4.3 Vision 11 2.4.4 Strategic Plan 11 2.4.5 Mandate 12 2.4.6 Responsibilities of the Commission 12 2.4.7 Role of the Chair 12 2.4.8 Role of the Commission member 13 2.4.9 Role of the Executive Director 13 2.5 Complaint Process 14 2.5.1 Categories of Complaint 14 2.5.2 Processing of the Complaints 14 2.5.3 Time Limits 15 2.5.4 Investigations 17 2.5.5 Notification of the Police Officer 17 2.5.6 Appointment of an Investigator 17 2.5.7 Investigation Report 18 2.5.8 Investigation of a Serious Incident 18 Part 3 - Areas of Examination, Analysis and Recommendations 19 3.1 Relationships 20 3.1.1 Recommendations 21 3.2 Roles and Responsibilities 22 3.2.1 Recommendations 22 3.3 Policies and Procedures 23 3.3.1 Recommendation 23 3.4 Records Management System 23 3.4.1 Recommendation 24 3.5 Investigators 24 3.5.1 Recommendations 25 3.6 Cost of Investigations 25 3.6.1 Recommendation 26 3.7 Arbitrators 26 3.7.1 Recommendation 27 3.8 Public Police and Civic Authority Awareness 27 3.9 Police Act 27 3.9.1 Recommendation 28 3.10 Adequacy of Policing 28 3.10.1 Recommendations 29 3.11 Six-month Time limit for Investigations 29 3.11.1 Recommendation 30 3.12 Professional Standards 30 3.12.1 Recommendation 31 3.13 Serious Incident Response Team (SIRT) 31 3.13.1 Recommendation 32 3.14 Structure, Function and selection of the Commission 32 3.14.1 Recommendations 34 Part 4: The McCloskey File 35 4.1 Introduction 35 4.2 The Investigations 35 4.3 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. ANNOUNCING NEW EDITION OF ADMISSIBILITY OF STATEMENTS - 2013 Police Edition by The Honourable René J. Marin, CM, OMM, OOnt. Q.C., J.D., CD LLD Inside you'll learn about: • Persons in authority • Detention and arrest • Inducements • Video/audio recording of statements • After-the-fact evidence • The right to counsel • Disclosure • Reasonable expectation of privacy • Jailhouse confessions • The polygraph • Prior inconsistent statements • Confirming confessions NEW IN THIE EDITION The new, 2013 Police Edition thoroughly reviews and updates all the significant devel- opments in this area of law since the last edition, including: • Police deception • Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanbook for Police on DV
    sponsored by: Department of Justice Ministère de la Justice Canada Canada Royal Canadian Gendarmerie royale Mounted Police du Canada A Handbook for Police Responding to Domestic Violence: Promoting Safer Communities by Integrating Research & Practice The support of the Department of Justice Canada and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed herein are those of the Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System of the London Family Court Clinic, Inc. in consultation with a National Advisory Committee and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice Canada nor the RCMP. This handbook is adapted from: Baker, L.B., Jaffe, P.G., Berkowitz, S.J. & Berkman, M. (2002). Children Exposed to Violence: A handbook for police trainers to increase understanding and improve community responses. London, ON: Centre for Children & Families in the Justice System National Advisory Committee Members: Sgt. Micheline Bourret, Montreal Police Services, QC Gaynell Cloney-Bowlen, Fredericton Police Services, NB Cpl. Lori Lynn Colbourne, RCMP, ON Cpl. Les Dell, RCMP, PE A/Staff Sgt. June Dobson, Ontario Provincial Police, ON Det. Laurie Ewing, London Police Services, ON Insp. Len Favreau, Peel Police Services, ON Debra George, Family Service Regina, SK Lisa Heslop, Family Consultant Services/London Police Services, ON Nathalie Levman, Department of Justice Canada, ON Cst. Lana Prosper, RCMP, Stephenville, NL Sgt. Kevin Scott, New Glasgow Police Services, NS Deborah Sinclair, MSW, Private Practice, Toronto, ON Sgt. John Sutherland, RCMP, YT S/Sgt. John Syrette, Anishinabek Police Service, ON S/Sgt. Dave Zukiwsky, Edmonton Police Services, AB Copyright © 2004, Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System of the London Family Court Clinic, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada ISBN # 1-895953-29-4 The content of this book cannot be reproduced for publication without the written permission of the Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Recommendations Concerning Various Aspects of Police Misconduct
    REPORT PREPARED BY THE HONOURABLE GEORGE FERGUSON, Q.C. ON THE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF POLICE MISCONDUCT VOLUME I COMMISSIONED BY: JULIAN FANTINO CHIEF OF POLICE TORONTO POLICE SERVICE JANUARY 2003 VOLUME I TABLE OF CONTENTS TERMS OF REFERENCE PART I: Disclosure of Police Misconduct 1 PART II: Systemic Issues 2 PART III: Informers and Agents 2 PART IV: The Investigation 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 PREFACE AND BACKGROUND 6 PART I: DISCLOSURE OF POLICE MISCONDUCT Excerpt from the Terms of Reference 8 Analysis 9 Recommendations 17 PART II: SYSTEMIC ISSUES Excerpt from the Terms of Reference 18 Analysis 19 Recruitment and the Employment Unit 19 Recommendations 21 Transfers, Promotions, Supervision, Training and Continuing Education 23 Recommendations 25 Internal Affairs 26 Recommendations 28 Use of Alcohol, Drugs and Other Substances 30 Recommendations 31 ii PART III: INFORMERS AND AGENTS Excerpt from the Terms of Reference 33 Analysis 33 Recommendations 35 SCHEDULE “A” Interview and Meeting Participants 36 SCHEDULE “B” Reference Materials 40 SCHEDULE “C” Written Submissions Made By Individuals or Organizations 59 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE PART I: DISCLOSURE OF POLICE MISCONDUCT a. To review and provide your analysis of the current law in Ontario as it pertains to when, in what manner and under what circumstances does the Police Service have an obligation to bring to the attention of the Crown, alleged or proven acts of misconduct of a police officer who will be a witness or was otherwise involved in an investigation that has led to a criminal proceeding. b. To compare the law in Ontario as described in paragraph (a) above with the law in other common law jurisdictions, especially the United States, England, Australia and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Gender Audits in Policing Organizations Prepared for Status of Women Canada Prepared by: Ruth Montgomery Date: March 2012 This document expresses the views of the author and does not necessarily represent the views or official policy of Status of Women Canada or the Government of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Notorious Bacon Brothers – Inside Gang Warfare on Vancouver Streets
    OCTOBER 2013 2 BLUE LINE MAGAZINE October 2013 Volume 25 Number 8 6 Features 6 A tale of two deputies From reserves to executives – a 35 year trek through the ranks 10 A shared response Vancouver Police leverage best practices with interoperable capabilities 12 Excellence in giving evidence Tips for new police officers 16 Renewal from a community base 10 Afghanistan policing strives for a better future based on global norms Departments 38 Back of Book – There is nothing as satisfying as a good firing 38 BlueLinks Advertisers Directory 28 Book Review – The Notorious Bacon Brothers 22 Deep Blue – It’s all a matter of positioning 29, 33 Dispatches 33 Education Directory 26 Holding the Line – Tired of being tired 37 MarketPlace 5 Publisher’s Commentary – A call for a little revenge 16 21 Science Beat – Interviewing intoxicated witnesses 30 Technology – Security tools and technology in Afghanistan Case Law 34 Officer’s non-communicated intentions irrelevant 36 Odour and observation justify arrest BLUE LINE MAGAZINE 3 OCTOBER 2013 OCTOBER 2013 4 BLUE LINE MAGAZINE PUBLISHER’S COMMENTARY Blue Line by Morley Lymburner Magazine Inc. PUBLISHER Morley S. Lymburner – [email protected] A call for a little revenge GENERAL MANAGER Mary K. Lymburner – [email protected] He was perhaps 19 or 20 become so wrapped up in rehabilitation that SENIOR EDITOR years old. His youthful unwrin- deterrence is no longer viewed as an effective Mark Reesor – [email protected] kled face betrayed an attempt to principle. The word “punishment” elicits hor- look hardened and contemptu- ror but both deterrence and punishment, also NEWS EDITOR ous.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2020 to Learn More About Each of These Key Deliverable Areas
    www.cacp.ca 2 CANADIAN ASSOCIATION 0 OF CHIEFS OF POLICE 2 0 ANNUAL REVIEW Table of Contents 3 President’s Message 4 Message from the Executive Director 5 Strategic Direction Annual Review Staff Editor: Natalie Wright Supported by the 11 Governance CACP National Office: Aviva Rotenberg, Peter Cuthbert, Magda Mitilineos, Veronica Sutherland Leadership Development and Jane Li Wing 32 CACP Executive 2020 President: 37 Thought Leadership Chief Bryan Larkin Vice-Presidents: Deputy Commissioner Michael Duheme 44 Advocacy Chief Kimberley Greenwood Chief Paul Smith Secretary Treasurer: 47 Research ChiefPast President: Officer Dave Jones Chief Constable Adam Palmer 52 Public Education Interim Executive Director: Peter Cuthbert 56 Partnerships For a full list of CACP Board Members consult the “Governance” section of this publication. 64 Communications The opinions and comments expressed in the CACP 2020 Annual Review are made without prejudice. They are not 70 Recognition the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Policenecessarily or its theExecutive. official positionReproduction of of articles and artwork is strictly 78 A National Perspective on Policing in Canada prohibited without prior written permission of the CACP. Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police 300 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 100 Kanata, Ontario K2K 0E3 Phone: (613) 595-1101 Fax: (613) 383-0372 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cacp.ca Layout: Marie-Eve Allard / ALLARD GRAPHICS www.cacp.ca 2 CACP Annual Review / 2020 President’s Message By Chief Bryan Larkin s each incoming President assumes the This Annual Review highlights the incredible leadership of the association, they have the achievements and progress of our association in unique opportunity to champion certain 2020 which was only possible thanks to the passion, A expertise, guidance, unwavering support, leadership, leadership in Canada.
    [Show full text]