DOCSLIB.ORG

Weekly Lobbying Articles October 13, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weekly Lobbying Articles October 13, 2017 Weekly Lobbying Articles October 13, 2017 kbia October 12, 2017 University of Missouri Calls Off Search for Staff Lobbyist http://kbia.org/post/university-missouri-calls-search-staff-lobbyist#stream/0 The University of Missouri has called off its search for a staff lobbyist to replace employees it laid off in June. After laying off employees in the University Relations office following system-wide budget cuts, the university started to search for a lobbyist to replace those employees, but they’ve canceled that search. This means the university is now relying on third party lobbying firms like Clark Hill and Statehouse Strategies. Jake Haselswerdt is a political science professor at MU and was formerly a lobbyist for universities in Washington D.C. He said lobbyists are an important asset for universities. “Any university is going to have many issues involving government,” Haselswerdt said. “There’s just a lot of reasons why a University would want to have a voice at the federal level. Then obviously at the state level for public universities a huge portion of their funding comes as a state appropriation.” He says that public relations issues at MU have played a part in recent state funding cuts, and lobbyists can help protect that funding. “And as a lobbyist can you prevent all that from happening? No, but sort of like government relations, or public relations I should say, you can try to do some damage control and maybe try to get out ahead of some of that stuff with the legislature to minimize the impact it might have on your funding in the future,” Haselswerdt said. MU spokesperson Christian Basi said after interviewing multiple candidates University President Mun Choi decided to cancel the search and take more time to decide how to move forward. “We want to take a look at the current resources that we have, and take a closer look at what the needs are for the campus and the system,” Basi said. “And then take some time to develop a longer term vision for the future of our governmental relations at the university.” Basi says maintaining close relationships with lawmakers in Jefferson City is a priority. OpenSecrets.org October 10, 2017 Why some campaign contributions get returned https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/10/returned-contributions/ It’s been a big week for politicians refunding tainted campaign donations. First, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. returned a $32,000 contribution from Donald Trump’s personal attorney Marc Kasowitz, who made the donation in 2013 after Vance decided not to pursue a fraud investigation against Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. Now, at least a dozen Democrats have refunded or donated to charity contributions from media mogul Harvey Weinstein following a New York Times story alleging decades of sexual harassment. Refunds of campaign contributions are not rare, and most are not particularly scandalous. Losing campaigns often give back their leftover funds, although they are not legally obligated to. Some campaigns offer to refund supporters who have a change of heart, as former Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) did for his irate Republican backers when he switched parties in 2009, but that’s not required, either. Campaigns regularly issue refunds of contributions they can’t legally accept, such as donations from people who have already given the legal limit, an issue that plagued Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign. Some entities, such as federal contractors, are not permitted to make any contributions, which is why the pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC Priorities USA had to refund $200,000 to a construction company last June. Campaigns with millions of individual donors, such as Barack Obama’s or Bernie Sanders’, have to work hard to stay top of these issues and are in a constant state of back-and-forth with the Federal Election Commission. Occasionally, legally dubious contributions are not simply innocent mistakes by donors but concerted efforts to hide the source. Last year, the OpenSecrets Blog partnered with The Boston Globe‘s Spotlight team to uncover a scheme by a Boston law firm to reimburse partners for their political donations, primarily to Democrats. Thornton Law Firm claimed that the arrangement was legal, but Massachusetts regulators disagreed. At least 30 candidates, including Hillary Clinton, subsequently either refunded the donations or forwarded them to the U.S. Treasury. The juiciest campaign finance scandals involve contributions from foreign nationals. In 1997, The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward and Brian Duffy revealed that the Justice Department was investigating an effort by the People’s Republic of China to funnel contributions to President Bill Clinton’s reelection effort. Clinton had to return $640,000 (from his legal defense fund) that traced back to the head of a weapons company owned by the Chinese military, and the Democratic National Committee refunded $100,000 to a Chinese-American fundraiser who confessed to receiving the money from a lieutenant colonel in the People’s Liberation Army. Last year, the FEC prodded Donald Trump’s campaign to return several contributions from foreigners. Contributions from fraudsters are another headache for campaigns and a major source of refunds. When victims of financier Robert Allen Stanford’s Ponzi scheme tried to recover $1.6 million of his campaign contributions, they had to take five party committees to court to get them to cough it up. The refunds included about $1 million from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and about $260,000 from the National Republican Congressional Committee. However, many of Stanford’s contributions were too small to be worth suing over, including $4,600 given to Barack Obama, who never returned the money. Recipients of donations from an even more notorious source — Bernie Madoff — were quicker to donate to a victims’ fund. And in 2004, New Jersey Democrats gave to charity a fraction of the contributions they had received from real estate developer Charles Kushner, who had donated money in the names of his partnerships without authorization. Kushner subsequently served 14 months in prison but was a free man by 2015, when he and his wife made a $100,000 contribution to a super PAC supporting Donald Trump … the father-in-law of Kushner’s son Jared. Campaigns that purport to uphold a higher standard end up needing to return more contributions than most. Barack Obama’s campaign, for example, made it a point of pride not to accept contributions from registered lobbyists; consequently, it had to issue refunds to five lobbyist donors following an OpenSecrets Blog investigation. Finally, there are contributions, such as Weinstein’s, which are legal but politically toxic. If a controversial donation comes to light, politicians have to weigh their need for money against the bad press they would suffer by keeping it. In 2015, for example, three Republican presidential candidates returned contributions from the president of a white supremacist organization that was cited in the manifesto of the perpetrator of the Charleston church shooting. In contrast, Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens (R) not only kept $1 million from a venture capitalist accused of sexual abuse but even gave him a seat on stage at his inauguration. The presidential campaign and super PAC of Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R), on the other hand, returned $250,000 to the same donor. Sometimes the focus is on questionable contributions from committees rather than individuals. Whenever a member of congress is under investigation — for example, Robert Menendez (DN.J.) — candidates who have received donations from the member’s leadership PAC face calls to return them. Companies involved in major scandal, such as Enron in 2001, also tend to see a flurry of contributions returned to their political action committees or forwarded to charity. Last cycle, candidates returned over $100 million in precious individual contributions, and this cycle is shaping up the same way. While the $1.4 million that Weinstein’s family has donated since 1990 is sizable by any standard, he wasn’t among last cycle’s top 500 donors. The next time a scandal hits one of the true mega-donors, however, watch how willing politicians are to let go of the tainted cash. Politico October 10, 2017 Puerto Rico turns to K Street for help http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/politico-influence/2017/10/10/puerto-rico-turns-to-k-street-for- help-222726 PUERTO RICO TURNS TO K STREET FOR HELP: The Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, the federal board created last year to help Puerto Rico get its finances under control, has hired Williams & Jensen to lobby the federal government for help after a pair of hurricanes devastated the island. J. Steven Hart, the firm’s chairman, and seven other Williams & Jensen lobbyists will represent the island on “disaster relief and recovery efforts; Puerto Rico Medicaid funding; tax reform; economic development; transportation, energy and electricity; financial services; budget and appropriations,” according to a disclosure filing. — The oversight board isn’t the only entity in Puerto Rico turning to Washington lobbyists for help. The Puerto Rico Telephone Company has hired Wiley Rein’s Scott Weaver to lobby on disaster relief funding, according to a disclosure filing. Weaver previously lobbied for the company on other issues before the registration lapsed last year. A Puerto Rican medical school and a nonprofit based on the island have also hired lobbyists in the wake of the hurricanes, as PI noted on Friday. — Another interesting filing: The Normandy Group has signed the Coalition for Fair Gaming, which is in a dispute with the National Indian Gaming Commission over technical standards for gambling machines. Former Rep. Henry Bonilla (R-Texas) is among the lobbyists are representing the coalition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Officials Say Flynn Discussed Sanctions
    Officials say Flynn discussed sanctions The Washington Post February 10, 2017 Friday, Met 2 Edition Copyright 2017 The Washington Post All Rights Reserved Distribution: Every Zone Section: A-SECTION; Pg. A08 Length: 1971 words Byline: Greg Miller;Adam Entous;Ellen Nakashima Body Talks with Russia envoy said to have occurred before Trump took office National security adviser Michael Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country's ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials, current and former U.S. officials said. Flynn's communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted by some senior U.S. officials as an inappropriate and potentially illegal signal to the Kremlin that it could expect a reprieve from sanctions that were being imposed by the Obama administration in late December to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 election. Flynn on Wednesday denied that he had discussed sanctions with Kislyak. Asked in an interview whether he had ever done so, he twice said, "No." On Thursday, Flynn, through his spokesman, backed away from the denial. The spokesman said Flynn "indicated that while he had no recollection of discussing sanctions, he couldn't be certain that the topic never came up." Officials said this week that the FBI is continuing to examine Flynn's communications with Kislyak. Several officials emphasized that while sanctions were discussed, they did not see evidence that Flynn had an intent to convey an explicit promise to take action after the inauguration. Flynn's contacts with the ambassador attracted attention within the Obama administration because of the timing.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin, Trump and Democracy's Slippery Slope Toward Oligarchy
    Putin, Trump and Democracy’s Slippery Slope Toward Oligarchy Acknowledgments The Common Cause Education Fund is the research and public education affiliate of Common Cause, founded in 1970 by John Gardner. Common Cause is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of American democracy. We work to create open, honest and accountable government that serves the public interest; promote equal rights, opportunity, and representation for all; and empower all people to make their voices heard in the political process. This report was produced with the support of small dollar contributions from Americans who believe in transparent, open, and accountable govern- ment, as well as generous grants from the WhyNot Initiative and the Philip & Janice Levin Foundation. It was written by Joe Maschman, a Common Cause legal fellow, and edited by Paul Seamus Ryan, vice president for policy and litigation; Scott Swenson, vice president for communications, Susannah Goodman, director of voting integrity; and Dale Eisman, senior writer/editor. The authors and editors wish to express our thanks to Kerstin Diehn for her design and to Common Cause President Karen Hobert Flynn for her guidance and encouragement in the preparation of this report. Introduction Americans are more united than those who benefit from division want us to believe. Republicans, Democrats, and Independents largely agree that registration and voting should be secure, modern, and convenient, and that all eligible people should be encouraged to vote. As voters, we recognize that the more people who participate in our elections, the better it is for our democracy, making it more likely that the representatives who are elected will listen to the people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics Resistance
    The Ethics Resistance BRIAN SHEPPARD* ABSTRACT Legal ethics complaints have been ®led against several of the high-ranking lawyers in the Trump Administration, often in their home states. While individ- ual complaints have caught the public eye, the collective movement to use legal ethics to resist Trumpism has escaped attention. This is not altogether surpris- ing: legal ethics rules have not historically been an attractive tool for political change. Perhaps, desperate times have called for desperate measures. This ªEthics Resistanceº will face signi®cant opposing forces. Legal ethics complaints seldom result in punishment. Further, the agencies that are asked to investigate these high-pro®le and controversial matters will not be eager to leave their comfort zones; they are accustomed to complaints from clients who are unhappy with their lawyers over straightforward matters like unreturned phone calls or high fees. There will also be loud dissenting voices from those who will see the movement as the weaponization of a tool designed for the mod- est task of lawyer self-governance. Finally, the complaints will have to navigate between powerful constitutional protections regarding lawyer speech and fed- eral power. But we should not dismiss this movement simply because it is unusual or challenging. The wisdom of the Ethics Resistance can only be judged after we understand its distinctive qualities and consider how they further or hinder our legal, institutional, and pragmatic interests. In this Article, I undertake that analysis and conclude that the movement has the capacity to be legally permissible, institutionally sound, and prudent. I fur- ther offer a list of best practices for future complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily 202
    From: The Washington Post To: (b) (6) Subject: rte’s victory after assaulting reporter reflects rising tribalism in American politics Date: Friday, May 26, 2017 11:39:49 AM If you're having trouble reading this, click here. The Daily 202 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Gianforte’s victory after assaulting reporter reflects epic.org EPIC-17-03-31-DHS-FOIA-20180515-Production-2 000001 rising tribalism in American politics Greg Gianforte apologizes for assaulting reporter dUring acceptance speech ~ BY JAMES HOHMANN ~ with Breanne Deppisch THE BIG IDEA: Greg Gianforte admitted to attacking a reporter and apologized during his victory speech last night, as he kept Montana's sole House seat in Republican hands. Now he and his party's leaders are trying to move on. On the eve of the special election, the wealthy technology epic.org EPIC-17-03-31-DHS-FOIA-20180515-Production-2 000002 entrepreneur flipped out when the Guardian’s Ben Jacobs asked him about the CBO’s score of the health care bill. He now faces misdemeanor assault charges for reportedly throwing Jacobs to the ground and breaking his glasses. “I made a mistake,” the congressman-elect said at his party in Bozeman. “Not in our minds!” yelled a supporter. David Weigel, who was there, reports that some in the crowd laughed. -- After his comfortable six-point victory, Republican congressional leaders are making clear there will be no meaningful consequences for his behavior. “Elections are about choices and Montanans made their choice,” Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement this morning. "Rep.-elect Gianforte is an outsider with real-world experience creating jobs in Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • A Very Stable Genius at That!” Trump Invoked the “Stable Genius” Phrase at Least Four Additional Times
    PENGUIN PRESS An imprint of Penguin Random House LLC penguinrandomhouse.com Copyright © 2020 by Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig Penguin supports copyright. Copyright fuels creativity, encourages diverse voices, promotes free speech, and creates a vibrant culture. Thank you for buying an authorized edition of this book and for complying with copyright laws by not reproducing, scanning, or distributing any part of it in any form without permission. You are supporting writers and allowing Penguin to continue to publish books for every reader. Library of Congress Control Number: 2019952799 ISBN 9781984877499 (hardcover) ISBN 9781984877505 (ebook) Cover design by Darren Haggar Cover photograph: Pool / Getty Images btb_ppg_c0_r2 To John, Elise, and Molly—you are my everything. To Naomi and Clara Rucker CONTENTS Title Page Copyright Dedication Authors’ Note Prologue PART ONE One. BUILDING BLOCKS Two. PARANOIA AND PANDEMONIUM Three. THE ROAD TO OBSTRUCTION Four. A FATEFUL FIRING Five. THE G-MAN COMETH PART TWO Six. SUITING UP FOR BATTLE Seven. IMPEDING JUSTICE Eight. A COVER-UP Nine. SHOCKING THE CONSCIENCE Ten. UNHINGED Eleven. WINGING IT PART THREE Twelve. SPYGATE Thirteen. BREAKDOWN Fourteen. ONE-MAN FIRING SQUAD Fifteen. CONGRATULATING PUTIN Sixteen. A CHILLING RAID PART FOUR Seventeen. HAND GRENADE DIPLOMACY Eighteen. THE RESISTANCE WITHIN Nineteen. SCARE-A-THON Twenty. AN ORNERY DIPLOMAT Twenty-one. GUT OVER BRAINS PART FIVE Twenty-two. AXIS OF ENABLERS Twenty-three. LOYALTY AND TRUTH Twenty-four. THE REPORT Twenty-five. THE SHOW GOES ON EPILOGUE Acknowledgments Notes Index About the Authors AUTHORS’ NOTE eporting on Donald Trump’s presidency has been a dizzying R journey. Stories fly by every hour, every day.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Lawyers
    The influencers The influencers t h e Leading500 Lawyers i n a merica The influencers inside Q&As A wiTh l wdrAgon 500 MeMbers IP Law’s new enTrepreneuriAl clAss wAr criMes TrIaLs in The forMer YugoslAviA The influencers inside Q&As A wiTh l wdrAgon 500 MeMbers IP Law’s new enTrepreneuriAl clAss wAr criMes TrIaLs in The forMer YugoslAviA 102806-MOL_Agility_8x10.5_R4_HR.pdf 9/16/10 3:39:53 PM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Complexity Requires Agility Complex litigation has evolved. Most law firms haven’t. The legal, technical, and economic demands of today’s sophisticated litigation require agility in staffing, fee structures, and strategic approach. That agility can be found only in a firm comprised exclusively of smart, experienced advocates, who not only are committed to understanding a client’s litigation challenges and goals, but also are willing to share a client’s risk by betting on themselves to achieve success. MOLOLAMKEN. A new model for today’s litigation environment. “Two superstars are opening their own boutique, MOLOLAMKEN.” The American Lawyer Both of our founding partners have been named to this year’s Lawdragon 500. Contact Steven Molo at 212.607.8160 (NY) or Jeffrey Lamken at 202.556.2000 (DC). www.mololamken.com One of the nation’s premier plaintiff’s personal injury law firms renowned for its achievements in the courtroom and its contributions to the community. Trial lawyers 33 N. DEARBORN, CHICAGO, IL 60602 | 888.364.3191 | WWW.CORBOYDEMETRIO.COM LAWDRAGON HONORS... Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, founded in 1997, has grown to over 250 lawyers practicing in offices stra- tegically located throughout the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV. Professionalism Here Be Dragons
    Originally published in Alice Gosfield, Health Law Handbook 2018 Edition, © 2018 Thomson Reuters. Used with permission. Health Law Handbook 2018 Edition is available in print and on Westlaw. For more information on this publication, please visit legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com. Part IV. Professionalism Here Be Dragons: Navigating Dangerous Territory with A “Challenging” Client WILLIAM W. HORTON JONES WALKER LLP I. AN INTRODUCTORY VIGNETTE: IT’S BETTER TO SEEK FORGIVENESS THAN PERMISSION. BUT THEN, ONLY THE LITTLE PEOPLE RE- ALLY NEED FORGIVENESS ANYWAY ............... 684 II. SITUATIONS THEY DON’T REALLY COVER IN ETHICS CLASS .............................................. 687 A. True Life, Ripped from the Headlines ............... 687 1. Too Many Lawyers .................................... 687 2. Acting on Advice of Counsel ......................... 692 3. How Can I Miss You If You Won’t Go Away? .... 700 B. But We’re Healthcare Lawyers! What Does All This Have to Do with Us? ............................... 703 III. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND PRACTICAL REALITY: DEALING WITH THE ETHICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES THAT ARISE IN A “CHALLENGING” ATTORNEY-CLIENT RE- LATIONSHIP ................................................. 708 A. First Principles (and First Problems) ............... 709 B. A Surfeit of Lawyers ..................................... 711 C. “The Lawyers Don’t Want Me to Say This, but . .” ......................................................... 715 D. The Slippery Slope from Counselor to Conspira- tor ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA • [email protected], [email protected]
    DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA • [email protected], [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Boston, Massachusetts Professor of Law (July 2019-present) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Civil Procedure; Free Speech in a Digital Age Service: Chair, Workshops Committee; Committee member, Admissions Committee UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FRANCIS KING CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW, Baltimore, Maryland Morton & Sophia Macht Professor of Law (2016-2019)· Lois K. Macht Research Professor & Professor of Law (with tenure) (2009-present)· Associate Professor of Law (2008-2009)· Assistant Professor of Law (2006-2007)· Visiting Assistant Professor (2004-2006) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Introduction to Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure II; Legal Writing and Research I Honors: UMB Champion of Excellence (2018); Teacher of the Year (May 2005); Moot Court Board Recognition (Fall 2006) Service: Faculty Advisor, MARYLAND LAW REVIEW (2010-present); Clerkship Committee (member, 2016-present); Faculty Adviser, American Constitution Society chapter; Curriculum Committee (member, 2013-15); Technology Committee (Co-Chair, 2012-13), Appointments Committee (Co-Chair, 2010-2011, member, 2008); Dean’s Strategic Planning Committee (2009-10); Faculty Advisor, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY (2006-2010); Professionalism and Diversity Committee (member, 2006-08). HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Boston, MA Visiting Professor of Law (Invited; scheduling TDB) FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, New York, N.Y. Visiting Professor of Law (Fall 2018) (Information Privacy Law course; Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in the Digital Age seminar). GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Washington, D.C. Visiting Professor of Law (Spring 2017) (The New Discrimination: From Cyber Harassment to Scoring Systems seminar) WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump and Criminal Conspiracy Law a RICO Explainer
    AP PHOTO/SUSAN WALSH AP PHOTO/SUSAN Donald Trump and Criminal Conspiracy Law A RICO Explainer By John Norris and Carolyn Kenney December 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Donald Trump and Criminal Conspiracy Law A RICO Explainer By John Norris and Carolyn Kenney December 2017 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Trump and RICO 11 Activities prior to the presidential campaign, particularly complex financial crimes 22 Coordination with Russian, or Russian-supported, entities during the campaign 27 Obstruction of justice and other areas of concern since the election 32 Other post-election matters 34 Conclusion 38 About the authors 39 Endnotes Introduction and summary The scope of investigations by Special Counsel Robert Mueller and others into the activities of President Donald Trump, his campaign, and businesses is sweeping. Mueller is tasked with investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and any potential collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. This mandate gives the special counsel ample imperative to study an array of links between Trump, Trump associates, and Russia, in a list of concerns that seems to grow by the day. The pace and intensity of this investigation was only highlighted by the recent release of the indictment and guilty plea of Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, who admitted under oath lying to the FBI about his multiple contacts with Russians during the campaign, and acknowledged that the Russians informed him that they possessed “thousands of emails” hacked from Democrats well before any public knowledge of the fact.1 Papadopoulos admitted that he shared information about his Russian contacts and desire to broker meetings with the Russians with his Trump campaign supervisors.
    [Show full text]
  • Comey Testimony Next Wekk
    Comey Testimony Next Wekk Orton outjuts his stance overtimes euphuistically or uncomplainingly after Maximilien lamming and shears decani, bronzed and charged. Thaxter remains templed after Simon numbers irretrievably or speck any domiciliations. Amadeus rifles abstinently as untremulous Hillary overinsuring her audit copolymerized linguistically. Is not only a difference between us to me, especially a criminal case out into russia against comey testimony and review panelists look back And I think Senator Warner agrees with me. She covers cybersecurity counterterrorism and intelligence issues. SPAN users can download up to four full Congressional Sessions or Hearings for free each month. Christiana grew up here are seeking to believe you agree with president donald trump or trump tasked kasowitz was not calming, apparently he denied knowing what comey testimony next wekk around noon show. Flynn at some parts that this week after hearing? Shocked by fox news networks and questioning from the cnn comey testimony mistake of a devastating. To provide testimony on oath in his conduct before these violent. Comey to display before Senate Judiciary Committee POLITICO. Live news, business and sport from around the world. Comey himself hinted that he testifies a blm mask is no one on it is that be allowed! Moscow had resigned four people are you saw on comey testimony next wekk it. You know you with, that are heading next week. The inauguration occurred back off in meteorology was poorly that comey testimony next wekk month and world health officials who recommended him? Yet you were going when a discussion with you, on wednesday issued seven minutes of him he clearly not comey testimony next wekk or support.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-8 PV Wed CRAIG.Indd
    PLAINVIEW HERALD, WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2020 POLITICS PAGE 5A GOP TRUMP GOP worries Trump’s Trump donors among early recipients divisive June imperils of coronavirus loans Senate control BY BRIAN SLODYSKO AND NewsMax, which was approved for a With money still available, Con- ANGELIKI KASTANIS loan up to $5 million on April 13, the gress voted to extend the program just BY ALAN FRAM States. Associated Press data shows. NewsMax CEO Chris- as it was expiring, sett ing a new date Associated Press John Bolton, his former topher Ruddy has donated $525,000 of Aug. 8. national security adviser, WASHINGTON (AP) — As much to political committ ees supporting Th e public may never know the WASHINGTON (AP) released a book claim- as $273 million in federal coronavirus Trump, records show. He did not identity of more than 80% of the — President Donald ing Trump asked China’s aid was awarded to more than 100 respond to a request for comment. nearly 5 million benefi ciaries to Trump’s June began with president to buy more farm companies that are owned or operated Muy Brands, a San Antonio, Texas- date because the administration has his Bible-clutching photo products to bolster his by major donors to President Donald based company that operates Taco refused to release details on loans op outside a church aft er reelection. Trump also used Trump’s election eff orts, according to Bell, Pizza Hut and Wendy’s fran- under $150,000 — the vast majority authorities used chemicals the month to refuse to erase an Associated Press analysis of federal chises, was approved for a loan worth of borrowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report, 2018
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT Ten Years On Highlights of the Year at ProPublica Impact Our journalism spurred a host of real-world changes, including the reversal of President Donald Trump’s migrant family separation policy; the first federal leg- islation in decades addressing maternal deaths; the end of a Facebook practice that facilitated discrimi- nation; and the resignation of leaders from a troubled children’s charity operating in Liberia. Many of these changes came at a local level, including a politician losing his bid for reelection in Chicago, a police chief’s resignation in Indiana after revelations about police brutality and the arrests of white supremacists re- sponsible for violence in Charlottesville. Important Stories Our work revealed how a trio of Mar-a-Lago business- men are quietly shaping policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and it explained how a bud- get-deprived IRS is unable to pursue tax cheats. We Claudio Papapietro for ProPublica unmasked side deals and hidden incentives in the health insurance industry; traced how junk forensic Cover: Months after the Trump administration was ordered science has become entrenched in the criminal jus- to stop separating children from their parents at the border, tice system; exposed Chicago’s aggressive and un- ProPublica was the first to reveal that the separations equal ticketing practices and revealed apparent age continued. In one case, a four-year-old Salvadoran boy, discrimination at IBM. named Brayan, had been taken from his father and sent to a foster home in New York. After our story, authorities reversed course and reunited the boy with his father.
    [Show full text]