DOCSLIB.ORG

DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA • [email protected], [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA • Dkcitron@Bu.Edu, Keatsmorris@Gmail.Com DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA • [email protected], [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Boston, Massachusetts Professor of Law (July 2019-present) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Civil Procedure; Free Speech in a Digital Age Service: Chair, Workshops Committee; Committee member, Admissions Committee UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FRANCIS KING CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW, Baltimore, Maryland Morton & Sophia Macht Professor of Law (2016-2019)· Lois K. Macht Research Professor & Professor of Law (with tenure) (2009-present)· Associate Professor of Law (2008-2009)· Assistant Professor of Law (2006-2007)· Visiting Assistant Professor (2004-2006) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Introduction to Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure II; Legal Writing and Research I Honors: UMB Champion of Excellence (2018); Teacher of the Year (May 2005); Moot Court Board Recognition (Fall 2006) Service: Faculty Advisor, MARYLAND LAW REVIEW (2010-present); Clerkship Committee (member, 2016-present); Faculty Adviser, American Constitution Society chapter; Curriculum Committee (member, 2013-15); Technology Committee (Co-Chair, 2012-13), Appointments Committee (Co-Chair, 2010-2011, member, 2008); Dean’s Strategic Planning Committee (2009-10); Faculty Advisor, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY (2006-2010); Professionalism and Diversity Committee (member, 2006-08). HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Boston, MA Visiting Professor of Law (Invited; scheduling TDB) FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, New York, N.Y. Visiting Professor of Law (Fall 2018) (Information Privacy Law course; Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in the Digital Age seminar). GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Washington, D.C. Visiting Professor of Law (Spring 2017) (The New Discrimination: From Cyber Harassment to Scoring Systems seminar) WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, St. Louis, Missouri 1 Dean’s Distinguished Visitor (April 20-22, 2016) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST, Amherst, Massachusetts Interdisciplinary Studies Scholar in Residence (April 4-7, 2016) FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, New York, New York Adjunct Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing (1997-2006) AWARDS 2019 MacArthur Fellow 2018 Privacy for Policymakers Best Paper Award for “Sexual Privacy” UMB 2018 Champion of Excellence 2016 Privacy for Policymakers Best Paper Award for “The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General” and “Risk and Anxiety: A Theory of Data Breach Harms” (coauthored with Daniel J. Solove) Best Paper of 2016, International Association of Privacy Practitioners for “The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General” Best Paper of 2014, International Association of Privacy Practitioners for “The Scored Society” (coauthored with Frank Pasquale) Top 50 World Thinkers by PROSPECT UK MAGAZINE, http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/philosophy/world-thinkers-2015-danielle-keats-citron (naming 50 “leaders in their fields, engaging in original and profound ways with the central questions of the world today—whether in economics, science, philosophy, religion or feminism. We chose them based on recommendations from our wide pool of writers and editors”). Top 50 Most Influential Marylanders, 2015, Daily Record, http://thedailyrecord.com/influential- marylanders/. PUBLICATIONS BOOK HATE CRIMES IN CYBERSPACE (Harvard University Press September 2014) Excerpted in Newsweek, http://www.newsweek.com/internet-and-golden-age-bully-271800, and Slate, http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2014/10/revenge_porn_laws_sample_text_for_ state_lawmakers.html Highlighted in the “20 Best Moments for Women in 2014” by the Editors of Cosmopolitan (“law professor Danielle Keats Citron published a book on Internet harassment that has the potential to totally shift the legal landscape”) 2 Featured as the centerpiece of an online symposium held by the BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW (October-November 2015). Cited in academic casebooks, including THE FIRST AMENDMENT (edited by Geoffrey Stone et al.), Daniel J. Solove and Paul Schwartz, INFORMATION PRIVACY LAW (5th edition); WILLIAM MCGEVERAN, PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION LAW (2016). Reviewed by Erwin Chemerinsky in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Martha Nussbaum in The Nation, Robin West in Jotwell, and many others: “Vividly written and carefully argued, the book is a fine account of law in this area… We should, as Citron argues, reject the facile romanticization of the Internet as the last frontier of true freedom. We should acknowledge that the Internet both facilitates expression and silences, both allows speech and muzzles it… The major contribution of Citron’s book is its lucid summary of the vast network of laws, both state and federal, that are pertinent to cyberabuse. As she shows, we can do quite a lot for victims of cyberabuse without chilling expression… Citron confronts the perpetual free-speech/First Amendment problems attendant to her family of proposals head-on, and the case she makes is persuasive… Citron makes a number of useful proposals for legal reform while convincing readers of the seriousness of the problem.”—Martha C. Nussbaum, The Nation “Danielle Citron’s Hate Crimes in Cyberspace is a breakthrough book. It has been compared, and with good reason, to Catherine MacKinnon’s Sexual Harassment of Working Women. The book makes three major contributions. All are central to furthering the equality of women and men both in cyberspace and elsewhere. The book thus serves as a blueprint for what Citron insightfully calls a new civil rights movement. It gives legal representatives and victims a roadmap for charting out legal actions that can be taken to halt the abuse being currently suffered, and to compensate for past harms. It gives state and federal legislators a menu of options for strengthening the law in this area, so that cyberspace can be a safe as well as robust domain for the expression of views on all subjects. It responds to First Amendment worries about the possibility that her proposed reforms might chill valuable speech, and it suggests paths for interested private parties who want to affect the trajectory here outside the law. It’s a tour de force and I believe it will succeed. It will change the law, change the conversation, and change attitudes toward and regarding this extraordinarily abusive and harmful behavior. It will strengthen women’s civil rights, and thus strengthen women’s equality and at core, it will be a significant step toward ensuring women’s safety in the public space of employment and education, as well as in cyberspace and the home. This is a book to celebrate, to study, to argue over, and, mostly, to use.” —Robin West, Jotwell “Citron…focuses on how online hate speech ruins lives, most often women’s lives. She cites surveys that show that 60 to 70 percent of cyber stalking victims are women, and she details cases in which women have been targeted, defamed, and threatened with rape and murder…The very same things that make the Internet such a uniquely powerful medium for freedom of speech make it a uniquely powerful medium for hate crimes…The difficult question--as always in First Amendment and most constitutional litigation--is where to draw the line. In grappling with that and offering provisional answers, Citron [does] a great service.” — Erwin Chemerinsky Chronicle of Higher Education “This book sets forth a compelling argument that the internet should not be allowed to maintain its ‘Wild West’ anarchic status, because its ability to facilitate cyber-bullying outweighs the virtues of maintaining that status… Hate Crimes in Cyberspace’s main strength lies in its sustained and detailed exploration of the bizarrely convoluted, sustained and extremely hurtful nature of online abuse of individuals… Its pioneering research could and should be used to support the case for introducing a criminal offence of gender-based hate speech in various countries.”—Helen Fenwick, Times Higher Education 3 “To be sure, police and prosecutors regularly fail to enforce existing laws when it comes to online abuse, either because they don’t take the abuse seriously or because they lack the technological skills to find the perpetrators. But while better training and more resources are certainly necessary, Citron argues persuasively that the law itself needs to evolve as well.”—Michelle Goldberg, The Nation “An impassioned call for equal rights for women on the Internet. Citron offers well-considered and modest changes to communications law and judicial procedure that could go a long way toward opening the Internet to safer and wider use by currently victimized groups. Her suggestion that anonymity online should be treated as a privilege that can be lost by violations of a site’s terms of service is particularly constructive… Frightening and infuriating, this demand for legal accountability for Internet barbarism deserves widespread exposure and serious consideration.”—Kirkus Reviews (starred review) “Citron addresses a significant, timely topic in this impressively comprehensive, expertly researched book. An excellent analysis of the social impact of Internet hate crimes.”—Lynne Maxwell, Library Journal (starred review) “There sometimes seems to be a river of hate on the internet, flowing steadily through different social media; people are often hurt, and there is no obvious end to it. In this book, Danielle Citron, an American law professor, proposes, with quiet authority, how we, as digital citizens, lawmakers, internet
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Online Harassment: a Legislative Solution
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\54-2\HLL205.txt unknown Seq: 1 11-MAY-17 15:55 ONLINE HARASSMENT: A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION EMMA MARSHAK* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 501 II. WHY IS ONLINE HARASSMENT A PROBLEM?................ 504 R a. The Scope of the Problem ............................ 504 R b. Economic Impact .................................... 507 R i. Lost Business Opportunities ...................... 507 R ii. Swatting ........................................ 510 R iii. Doxxing ........................................ 511 R III. CURRENT LAW .......................................... 512 R a. Divergent State Law ................................. 512 R b. Elements of the Law ................................. 514 R IV. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE PROBLEMS ........ 515 R a. Police Training ...................................... 515 R b. Investigative Resources .............................. 519 R c. Prosecutorial Jurisdiction ............................ 520 R V. SOLUTION ............................................... 521 R a. Proposed Legislation ................................ 521 R b. National Evidence Laboratory ........................ 526 R c. Training Materials ................................... 526 R VI. CONCLUSION ............................................ 528 R VII. APPENDIX ............................................... 530 R I. INTRODUCTION A journalist publishes an article; rape threats follow in the comments.1 An art curator has a conversation with a visitor to her gallery;
    [Show full text]
  • Officials Say Flynn Discussed Sanctions
    Officials say Flynn discussed sanctions The Washington Post February 10, 2017 Friday, Met 2 Edition Copyright 2017 The Washington Post All Rights Reserved Distribution: Every Zone Section: A-SECTION; Pg. A08 Length: 1971 words Byline: Greg Miller;Adam Entous;Ellen Nakashima Body Talks with Russia envoy said to have occurred before Trump took office National security adviser Michael Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country's ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials, current and former U.S. officials said. Flynn's communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted by some senior U.S. officials as an inappropriate and potentially illegal signal to the Kremlin that it could expect a reprieve from sanctions that were being imposed by the Obama administration in late December to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 election. Flynn on Wednesday denied that he had discussed sanctions with Kislyak. Asked in an interview whether he had ever done so, he twice said, "No." On Thursday, Flynn, through his spokesman, backed away from the denial. The spokesman said Flynn "indicated that while he had no recollection of discussing sanctions, he couldn't be certain that the topic never came up." Officials said this week that the FBI is continuing to examine Flynn's communications with Kislyak. Several officials emphasized that while sanctions were discussed, they did not see evidence that Flynn had an intent to convey an explicit promise to take action after the inauguration. Flynn's contacts with the ambassador attracted attention within the Obama administration because of the timing.
    [Show full text]
  • NARAL Ep5 V04 20200623.Mp3
    NARAL_Ep5_v04_20200623.mp3 Jess McIntosh [00:00:00] This limited series podcast is based on the book, "The Lie that Binds" by NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue with Ellie Langford. Each episode builds on the history terminology and figureheads established in the last. So we strongly recommend that you start from episode one before jumping ahead. Brianna Wu [00:00:18] The truth is, GamerGate is less of an event and more of a playbook to use against someone you don't like. Jess McIntosh [00:00:26] This is Brianna Wu, co-founder of independent videogame studio Giant SpaceKat. Brianna Wu [00:00:32] This is the GamerGate playbook. Find someone you want to shut up. Go to their entire life. Go through all their social media posts. Investigate them and find something to attack them with. And then get an army of people online to scream from the hills about this fact which may or may not be true and destroyed their reputation. The idea is to make the cost of speaking out so high that it's easier to just remain silent. Jess McIntosh [00:00:59] The GamerGate controversy started in August 2014. Brianna Wu [00:01:01] All through 2014 my women colleagues were being basically bullied out of the industry. Jess McIntosh [00:01:09] It was set off after game developer Zoe Quinn was falsely accused by their ex-boyfriend of sleeping with a videogame journalist to garner positive reviews for their company's new game. This led to an avalanche of rape threats, doxing and death threats against Quinn, as well as women who criticized sexism in the game industry in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Massachusetts 2020 Congressional Endorsement Questionnaire
    PROGRESSIVE MASSACHUSETTS 2020 CONGRESSIONAL ENDORSEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Candidate: Brianna Wu Office Sought: US House Representative, MA-08 Party: Democratic Website: www.briannawuforcongress.com Twitter: @BriannaWu Facebook: Facebook.com/developerbriannawu/ Email questions to [email protected]. CONFIDENTIAL SECTION 2 I. About You 1. Why are you running for office? And what will your top 3 priority pieces of legislation if elected? BW: After the election of Donald Trump, I realized I could not simply hope for a future course correction. I had to step up and do all I could to make sure it happened. Trump's election was a turning point in our society. Racism, discrimination, and the suppression of human rights seemed to become legitimized. Then, I started to look to my own congressman for leadership. I found that my congressman and my opponent, Rep. Stephen Lynch, first ran for the Massachusetts state legislature because he wanted to keep the LGBTQ community out of the Boston St. Patrick's Day parade. He promoted a ""gay panic"" legal defense for hate crimes. He voted for the Iraq War and against Obamacare. And, to say he has flip-flopped on choice would be generous. To me, his record is unacceptable and out-of-touch with Democratic values. I am running for this office because the status-quo is simply not working. We are running out of time to address the existential threats to our country and our world. We need universal healthcare, a Green New Deal, tuition-free public college, comprehensive immigration reform, universal gun safety, money out of politics, and a guarantee of LGBTQ and women's rights.
    [Show full text]
  • In Conjunction with the Entire Castilleja Learning Community, the ACE
    In conjunction with the entire Castilleja learning community, the ACE Center is excited to welcome everyone to Global Week 2013! Let the “Standing Up and Speaking Out” begin with ……………. YOU. What you’ll find inside …… 1. Overview of the Week 2. Daily Schedules: All-school and Grade-level Activities, Times and Locations 3. Short-Workshop Descriptions 4. Bios of Global Week Guests (alpha order) 5. Workshop Share-Out Instructions 6. Museum Experience Passport Page (for those students participating in the museum experience) Overview of the Week Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, January 7 January 8 January 9 January 10 January 11 Advisory 8:30–8:50 8:55–10:10 8:55–10:10 8:55–10:10 Social Partnership In 8:55–10:15 Youth Action: Enterprise: Engagement Speaks Free the Ada’s Café Workshop Performance Children, Akili Dada Craig Shiva Shanta Kielburger 8:55–12:00 Break 10:10– Break 10:10– Engagement Break 10:10– Break 10:15– 10:30 10:30 Workshops 10:30 10:40 10:40–11:30 10:30–12:00 10:30–1:50 10:30–1:50 Engagement Student Engagement Engagement Workshop Voice Workshops Workshops Share Out Workshops Lunch Lunch 11:30– Lunch 11:30– Lunch 11:30– Lunch 11:30 – 12:00–1:20 1:00 12:55 1:00 12:30 1:00–2:00 Democratization 12:40–1:40 in the 21st ACE Century: Workshop Share Out John Matisonn 1:30–3:00 Annie Break 1:50- Break 2:00– Break 1:50– Break 1:40– Leonard: 2:10 2:10 2:10 1:45 “The Story of Change” 1:45–2:30 Talisman 2:10–3:10 Performance Daily ACE Mini Workshops Monday, January 7 TIME WHO WHAT WHERE 8:30 – All Students/ Advisory Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Radiowaves Will Be Featuring Stories About WPR and WPT's History of Innovation and Impact on Public Broadcasting Nationally
    ON AIR & ONLINE FEBRUARY 2017 Final Forte WPR at 100 Meet Alex Hall Centennial Events Internships & Fellowships Featured Photo Earlier this month, WPR's To the Best of Our Knowledge explored the relationship between love WPR Next" Initiative Explores New Program Ideas and evolution at a sold- out live show in Madison, We often get asked, "Where does WPR come up with ideas for its sponsored by the Center programs?" First and foremost, we're inspired by you, our listeners for Humans in Nature. and neighbors around the state. During our 100th year, we're looking Excerpts from the show, to create the public radio programs of the future with a new initiative which included storyteller called WPR Next. Dasha Kelly Hamilton (pictured), will be We're going to try out a few new show ideas focused on science, broadcast nationally on pop culture, life in Wisconsin, and more. You can help our producers the show later this month. develop these ideas by telling us what interests you about these topics. Sound Bites Do you love science? What interests you most ---- do you wonder about new research in genetics, life on other planets, or ice cover on Winter Pledge Drive the Great Lakes? What about pop culture? What makes a great Begins February 21 book, movie or piece of music, and who would you like to hear WPR's winter interviewed? How about life in Wisconsin? What do you want to membership drive is know about our state's culture and history? What other topics would February 21 through 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Having It All
    Having It All How Public Radio Stations Can Provide Great Service and Live Within Their Means A report on the financial health of Public Radio, commissioned by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting BWB SOLUTIONS Table of Contents Executive Summary. 5 Methodology . 8 System-Wide Financial Health Trends . 9 Analysis of Financial and Audience Data. 10 Programming Expenses . 13 Financial Health Strategies. 15 Impact of Producing Programs Distributed Nationally . 17 Recommendations for Action . 19 Areas for Further Exploration . 21 Appendix A: National Producers . 22 Appendix B: Benchmark Studies . 23 Notes . 25 Having It All, Page 3 Acknowledgements This paper summarizes the work of many people Mark Handley, New Hampshire Public Radio and organizations in the public radio field. We would Earl Johnson, WABE-FM have been unable to complete this work without the Roger Johnson and Karen Olstad, KWSU-FM/AM generous commitments of time and information sup- John McCormack and Bill Miller, WUTC-FM plied by so many public radio industry leaders, con- Bill McGinley, WOI-AM sultants, heads of national organizations, and station Deborah Onslow, WMHT-FM managers. We would especially like to acknowledge Joan Rose, WUNC-FM the contributions of the members of the Project Greg Schnirring, Wisconsin Public Radio (now at CPB) Team at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting: Quyen Shanahan, WXPN-FM Vincent Curren, Duffy Winters, Jay Youngclaus, and Cary Smith, WBJC-FM Ted Coltman. Bruce Theriault of Bolder Strategies, John Stark, KNAU-FM Inc. provided valuable advice and counsel to the JoAnn Urofsky, WUSF-FM Project Team. Their collective insightful comments Stewart Vanderwilt, KUT-FM and careful guidance helped shape the study and the JoAnne Wallace, KQED-FM paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage
    Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage Aaron Joseph Johnson Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Aaron Joseph Johnson All rights reserved ABSTRACT Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage Aaron Joseph Johnson This dissertation is a study of jazz on American radio. The dissertation's meta-subjects are mediation, classification, and patronage in the presentation of music via distribution channels capable of reaching widespread audiences. The dissertation also addresses questions of race in the representation of jazz on radio. A central claim of the dissertation is that a given direction in jazz radio programming reflects the ideological, aesthetic, and political imperatives of a given broadcasting entity. I further argue that this ideological deployment of jazz can appear as conservative or progressive programming philosophies, and that these tendencies reflect discursive struggles over the identity of jazz. The first chapter, "Jazz on Noncommercial Radio," describes in some detail the current (circa 2013) taxonomy of American jazz radio. The remaining chapters are case studies of different aspects of jazz radio in the United States. Chapter 2, "Jazz is on the Left End of the Dial," presents considerable detail to the way the music is positioned on specific noncommercial stations. Chapter 3, "Duke Ellington and Radio," uses Ellington's multifaceted radio career (1925-1953) as radio bandleader, radio celebrity, and celebrity DJ to examine the medium's shifting relationship with jazz and black American creative ambition.
    [Show full text]
  • WAMC Staff Utica, NY WAMQ, 105.1 FM, Great Barrington, WAMC Executive Staff LIVE at the LINDA BROADCAST MA Alan Chartock | President and CEO WWES, 88.9 FM, Mt
    JULY 2020 PROGRAM GUIDE from alan Stations Help WAMC Go Green! Monthly column from Alan Chartock. You may elect to stop receiving our paper PAGE 2 WAMC, 90.3 FM, Albany, NY program guide, and view it on wamc.org. WAMC 1400 AM, Albany, NY Call us to be removed from the PROGRAM NOTES WAMK, 90.9 FM, Kingston, NY paper mailing list: 1-800-323-9262 ext. 133 What’s coming up on WAMC. WOSR, 91.7 FM, Middletown, NY PAGE 3 WCEL, 91.9 FM, Plattsburgh, NY PROGRAM SCHEDULE WCAN, 93.3 FM, Canajoharie, NY Our weekly schedule of programming. WANC, 103.9 FM, Ticonderoga, NY PAGE 4 WRUN-FM, 90.3 FM, Remsen- WAMC Staff Utica, NY WAMQ, 105.1 FM, Great Barrington, WAMC Executive Staff LIVE AT THE LINDA BROADCAST MA Alan Chartock | President and CEO WWES, 88.9 FM, Mt. Kisco, NY SCHEDULE Joe Donahue | Roundtable Host/ Senior WANR, 88.5 FM, Brewster, NY Advisor Listen to your favorite shows on air after WANZ, 90.1, Stamford, NY they have been at The Linda. Stacey Rosenberry | Director of Operations PAGE 5 and Engineering Translators Jordan Yoxall | Chief Financial Officer At the linda PAGE 5 W280DJ, 103.9 FM, Beacon, NY Management Staff W247BM, 97.3 FM, Cooperstown, NY Carl Blackwood | General Manager, The program descriptions W292ES, 106.3 FM, Dover Plains, Linda PAGE 6 NY Tina Renick | Programming Director W243BZ, 96.5 FM, Ellenville, NY Melissa Kees | Underwriting Manager Ashleigh Kinsey | Digital Media W271BF, 102.1 FM, Highland, NY our UNDERWRITERS Administrator W246BJ, 97.1 FM, Hudson, NY PAGE 12 Ian Pickus | News Director W204CJ, 88.7 FM, Lake Placid, NY Amber Sickles | Membership Director W292DX, 106.3 FM, Middletown, NY WAMC-FM broadcasts 365 days a year W215BG, 90.9 FM, Milford, PA WAMC to eastern New York and western New W299AG, 107.7 FM, Newburgh, NY Box 66600 England on 90.3 MHz.
    [Show full text]
  • Platform Justice: Content Moderation at an Inflection Point 3
    A HOOVER INSTITUTION ESSAY ON Platform Justice C ONTENT MODERATION at an INFLECTION POINT DANIELLE CITRON & QUINTA JURECIC Aegis Series Paper No. 1811 In June 2016, Facebook Vice President Andrew Bosworth circulated an internal memorandum describing the company’s mission. “We connect people,” he wrote. “Maybe someone finds love. Maybe [Facebook] even saves the life of someone on the brink of suicide. Maybe it costs a life by exposing someone to bullies. Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack coordinated on our tools.”1 Bosworth was not speaking metaphorically. The month after he distributed the memo, Facebook was sued by the parents of five victims of terrorist attacks conducted by Hamas, which had made extensive use of the company’s platform to recruit and organize. Days before, the social media platform had inadvertently broadcast a murder over the streaming app Facebook Live. National Security, Technology, and Law and Technology, Security, National Yet the outrage Facebook weathered in the aftermath of this violence was nothing compared to the scathing criticism it endured two years later after Buzzfeed News published Bosworth’s memo. When the memo leaked in March 2018, Facebook was neck-deep in controversies over its influence on the 2016 presidential election, including the use of the platform’s ad-targeting function by Russian trolls to sow political discord and the harvesting of user data under false pretenses by the Trump-affiliated political consultancy Cambridge Analytica.2 Meanwhile, Facebook’s competitors, Twitter and Google, faced mounting criticism over their failure to curb disinformation and abusive content.3 In 2016, Bosworth’s memo might have been an awkward attempt at self-reflection.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FIRST FORTY YEARS INTRODUCTION by Susan Stamberg
    THE FIRST FORTY YEARS INTRODUCTION by Susan Stamberg Shiny little platters. Not even five inches across. How could they possibly contain the soundtrack of four decades? How could the phone calls, the encounters, the danger, the desperation, the exhilaration and big, big laughs from two score years be compressed onto a handful of CDs? If you’ve lived with NPR, as so many of us have for so many years, you’ll be astonished at how many of these reports and conversations and reveries you remember—or how many come back to you (like familiar songs) after hearing just a few seconds of sound. And you’ll be amazed by how much you’ve missed—loyal as you are, you were too busy that day, or too distracted, or out of town, or giving birth (guess that falls under the “too distracted” category). Many of you have integrated NPR into your daily lives; you feel personally connected with it. NPR has gotten you through some fairly dramatic moments. Not just important historical events, but personal moments as well. I’ve been told that a woman’s terror during a CAT scan was tamed by the voice of Ira Flatow on Science Friday being piped into the dreaded scanner tube. So much of life is here. War, from the horrors of Vietnam to the brutalities that evanescent medium—they came to life, then disappeared. Now, of Iraq. Politics, from the intrigue of Watergate to the drama of the Anita on these CDs, all the extraordinary people and places and sounds Hill-Clarence Thomas controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin, Trump and Democracy's Slippery Slope Toward Oligarchy
    Putin, Trump and Democracy’s Slippery Slope Toward Oligarchy Acknowledgments The Common Cause Education Fund is the research and public education affiliate of Common Cause, founded in 1970 by John Gardner. Common Cause is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of American democracy. We work to create open, honest and accountable government that serves the public interest; promote equal rights, opportunity, and representation for all; and empower all people to make their voices heard in the political process. This report was produced with the support of small dollar contributions from Americans who believe in transparent, open, and accountable govern- ment, as well as generous grants from the WhyNot Initiative and the Philip & Janice Levin Foundation. It was written by Joe Maschman, a Common Cause legal fellow, and edited by Paul Seamus Ryan, vice president for policy and litigation; Scott Swenson, vice president for communications, Susannah Goodman, director of voting integrity; and Dale Eisman, senior writer/editor. The authors and editors wish to express our thanks to Kerstin Diehn for her design and to Common Cause President Karen Hobert Flynn for her guidance and encouragement in the preparation of this report. Introduction Americans are more united than those who benefit from division want us to believe. Republicans, Democrats, and Independents largely agree that registration and voting should be secure, modern, and convenient, and that all eligible people should be encouraged to vote. As voters, we recognize that the more people who participate in our elections, the better it is for our democracy, making it more likely that the representatives who are elected will listen to the people.
    [Show full text]