The First Experiments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The First Experiments SLAC-R-611 February 2003 LCLS THE FIRST EXPERIMENTS September 2000 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, University, Stanford, CA 94309 Work supported in part by the Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. ii Table of Contents First Scientific Experiments for the LCLS .....................................................v Atomic Physics Experiments ..........................................................................1 Plasma and Warm Dense Matter Studies......................................................13 Structural Studies on Single Particles and Biomolecules .............................35 Femtochemistry.............................................................................................63 Studies of Nanoscale Dynamics in Condensed Matter Physics....................85 X-ray Laser Physics ....................................................................................101 Appendix 1: Committee Members..............................................................113 iii iv First Scientific Experiments for the LCLS The Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) for the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) has selected six scientific experiments for the early phase of the project. The LCLS, with proposed construction in the 2003-2006 time frame, has been designed to utilize the last third of the existing Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) linac. The linac produces a high-current 5- 15 GeV electron beam that is bunched into 230 fs slices with a 120 Hz repetition rate. When traveling through a sufficiently long (of order of 100 m) undulator, the electron bunches will lead to self amplification of the emitted x-ray intensity constituting an x-ray free electron laser (XFEL). If funded as proposed, the LCLS will be the first XFEL in the world, operating in the 800-8,000 eV energy range. The emitted coherent x-rays will have unprecedented brightness with 1012-1013 photons/pulse in a 0.2-0.4% energy bandpass and an unprecedented time structure with a design pulse length of 230 fs. Studies are under way to reduce the pulse length to tens of femtoseconds. This document presents descriptions of the early scientific experiments selected by SAC in the spring of 2000. They cover a wide range of scientific fields. The experimental teams consist of many internationally recognized scientists who are excited about the unprecedented x-ray capabilities of LCLS that surely will lead to new scientific frontiers. More generally, this document serves to forward the scientific case for an accelerator-based XFEL source, as requested by the BESAC subpanel on Novel Coherent Light Sources, chaired by Stephen R. Leone. Two general classes of experiments are proposed for the LCLS. The first class consists of experiments where the x-ray beam is used to probe the sample without modifying it, as is done in most experiments at current synchrotron sources. In the second class, the LCLS beam is used to induce non-linear photo-processes or matter in extreme conditions. The same source can be used for both types of experiments by utilizing six-orders-of-magnitude changes in photon flux density by focusing the LCLS beam, and by exploiting the strong dependence of the photo- absorption cross section on photon energy and atomic number. The first five experiments, • Atomic Physics Experiments • Plasma and Warm Dense Matter Studies • Structural Studies on Single Particles and Biomolecules • Femtochemistry • Studies of Nanoscale Dynamics in Condensed Matter Physics are based on the design parameters of the LCLS (given in Table 1, next page) specified in the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) Design Study Report: The LCSL Design Study Group, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy by SLAC in 1998. Some of the experiments assume that the x-ray beam can be focused to 100 x 100 nm with 50% of full photon flux, which is today’s state of the art. v TABLE 1. Design parameters of the LCLS. Wavelength range 15 Å 1.5 Å Peak sat. power 11 GW 9 GW # coherent photons/pulse 2.2 x 1013 2.2 x 1012 Energy bandwidth 0.42% 0.21% Pulse width (FWHM) 230 fs 230 fs The order in which the experiments are described does not reflect their relative priority but rather indicates a thread of connectivity and dependency. All LCLS experiments involve the interaction of a high-power x-ray beam with atoms, and so the first experiment is aimed at understanding this process at a fundamental level. This basic knowledge is important for the second experiment, which uses the high power of the LCLS to create an interesting state of matter, so-called “warm dense matter,” and proposes to probe it by a second delayed LCLS pulse. The third experiment is tied to the first two in that it depends on the time scale over which a biological molecule disintegrates after it is hit by the LCLS beam. Radiation damage is one of the main obstacles today in determining the structure of proteins that cannot be crystallized. The experiment is based on the use of LCLS pulses that are fast enough to determine the structure by x-ray scattering before radiation damage sets in. The fourth experiment goes to the very heart of chemistry, aiming at obtaining molecular pictures, i.e., atomic positions, bond length and angles, during chemical reactions or transformations at femtosecond time scales, an area of research previously reserved for ultrafast lasers. Finally, experiment number five pushes the envelope in probing ordering phenomena in hard and soft condensed matter on the important nanometer length scale, which cannot be seen by optical photons, over a broad range of time scales. Nanoscale dynamics is not only scientifically interesting, but it constitutes the competitive arena of advanced technological devices. The above five experiments, even at this early proposal stage, already instill dreams of improved XFEL characteristics, for example, shorter pulse lengths. Just as the application of conventional lasers has been accompanied by R&D on lasers themselves, there needs to be an R&D program to explore new accelerator and optics concepts with LCLS. This is the goal of the sixth experiment, • X-ray Laser Physics. The history of and experience with three generations of synchrotron radiation sources has taught us that the above experiments are at best the tip of the iceberg of scientific opportunities. It is safe to predict that we have not yet thought of the most important experiments that eventually will be done with this new class of radiation sources—x-ray free electron lasers! - Gopal K. Shenoy and Joachim Stöhr, Co-Chairs, LCLS Scientific Advisory Committee vi Atomic Physics Experiments R. R. Freeman, University of California, Davis, CA P. H. Bucksbaum, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI K. Kulander, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA L. Young, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL R. Falcone, University of California, Berkeley, CA I. SUMMARY All Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) applications involve x-ray free electron laser (XFEL)- atom interactions, so understanding basic atomic physics is one of the most important early tasks. Warm dense matter starts with atomic absorption. Even the transmission, diffraction, and attenuation optics necessary to transport and condition the beam will involve basic interactions between atoms and the intense LCLS beam. The intensity and wavelength regime of LCLS place it apart from third-generation sources, and some of the x-ray science will be different. We are in a good position to estimate how basic effects like photoionization might change, but experiments are needed to confirm the calculations, to sort out the relative importance of competing processes, and to lay the foundation for any materials science experiments with the x-rays. We propose investigating this in controlled experiments, using both the focused and unfocused LCLS beam, at both design wavelengths (15 Å and 1.5 Å). In particular, we propose five initial experiments. The first one aims to directly observe multiple core hole formation in an atom. This is a novel phenomenon that could not be addressed in the past due to limitations in x-ray flux density. The second experiment extends nonlinear optics into the x-ray regime for the first time. It involves multiphoton ionization of a K-shell electron, which can be readily observed by characteristic x-ray emission with a photon energy that exceeds the LCLS pump energy. The third experiment exploits the unique features of LCLS to produce energetic clusters with high charge states that will undergo giant coulomb explosion. This experiment is of key importance in understanding energy transfer and radiation damage of the LCLS beam in clusters, molecules and particles (see proposal on biomolecules). Advanced research topics include studies of radiation and possibly lasing from XFEL-excited matter and the formation of highly excited laser plasmas (see proposal on plasmas and warm dense matter). II. BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATIONS A. Proposed experimental investigations 1. Direct observation of multiple core hole formation in an atom by the LCLS beam This is a novel phenomenon, since conditions necessary to produce multiple core holes by direct multiple photon excitation have not existed prior to the LCLS. The experimental signature for this is production of “hypersatellite” Auger electrons with energies significantly higher than those associated with single hole states. 1 2. Direct observation of multiphoton ionization of a K-shell electron This would extend nonlinear optics into the x-ray regime for the first time. Here
Recommended publications
  • FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Historic Preservation in Blighted Areas: Effects of the Abolishment of Redevelopment Agencies in California
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2012 The Future of Historic Preservation in Blighted Areas: Effects of the Abolishment of Redevelopment Agencies in California Lauro Alonso Parra University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Parra, Lauro Alonso, "The Future of Historic Preservation in Blighted Areas: Effects of the Abolishment of Redevelopment Agencies in California" (2012). Theses (Historic Preservation). 204. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/204 Suggested Citation: Parra, Lauro Alonso (2012). The Future of Historic Preservation in Blighted Areas: Effects of the Abolishment of Redevelopment Agencies in California. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/204 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Future of Historic Preservation in Blighted Areas: Effects of the Abolishment of Redevelopment Agencies in California Abstract Redevelopment agencies play a major role in the preservation or destruction of historic buildings. When considering the benefits of preservation, we not only consider the protection of buildings for history's sake; but its usage has become more evident as a form of economic growth. During 2011, in efforts to balance the budget in the state of California, Governor Brown proposed abolishing
    [Show full text]
  • China Dream, Space Dream: China's Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States
    China Dream, Space Dream 中国梦,航天梦China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States A report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Kevin Pollpeter Eric Anderson Jordan Wilson Fan Yang Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Patrick Besha and Dr. Scott Pace for reviewing a previous draft of this report. They would also like to thank Lynne Bush and Bret Silvis for their master editing skills. Of course, any errors or omissions are the fault of authors. Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Skyline
    MODERN SKYLINE Architecture and Development in the Financial District and Bunker Hill area Docent Reference Manual Revised February 2016 Original manual by intern Heather Rigby, 2001. Subsequent revisions by LA Conservancy staff and volunteers. All rights reserved Table of Contents About the tour 3 Gas Company Building 4 Building on the Past: The Architecture of Additions 5 One Bunker Hill (Southern California Edison) 6 Biltmore Tower 7 Tom Bradley Wing, Central Library 8 Maguire Gardens, Central Library 10 US Bank Tower (Library Tower) 11 Bunker Hill Steps 13 Citigroup Center 14 Cultural Landscapes 14 550 South Hope Street (California Bank and Trust) 16 611 Place (Crocker Citizens-Plaza/AT&T) 17 Aon Center (UCB Building/First Interstate Tower) 18 Modern Building and Preservation 19 A Visual Timeline 19 Adaptive Reuse 20 Downtown Standard (Superior Oil Building) 21 Tax Credits 22 The Pegasus (General Petroleum Building) 23 AC Martin and Contemporary Downtown 24 Figueroa at Wilshire (Sanwa Bank Plaza) 24 Destruction and Development 25 City National Plaza (ARCO Plaza) 26 Richfield Tower 28 Manulife Plaza 29 Union Bank Plaza 30 Westin Bonaventure Hotel 31 History of Bunker Hill 33 Four Hundred South Hope (Mellon Bank/O’Melveny and Myers) 34 Bank of America Plaza (Security Pacific Plaza) 35 Stuart M. Ketchum Downtown Y.M.C.A 37 Wells Fargo Plaza (Crocker Center) 38 California Plaza 39 Uptown Rocker 40 Untitled or Bell Communications Across the Globe 40 Appendix A: A Short Summary of Modern Architectural Styles 41 Appendix B: Los Angeles Building Height Limits 42 Appendix C: A Short History of Los Angeles 43 Updated February 2016 Page 2 ABOUT THE TOUR This tour covers some of the newer portions of the downtown Los Angeles skyline.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Memorandum Opinion and Order 03-330 of 12/9/2003
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-330 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) General Motors Corporation and ) Hughes Electronics Corporation, Transferors ) MB Docket No. 03-124 ) And ) ) The News Corporation Limited, Transferee, ) ) For Authority to Transfer Control ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 19, 2003 Released: January 14, 2004 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy and Martin issuing separate statements; Commissioners Copps and Adelstein dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Para. No. I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTIES .....................................................................................................6 A. The News Corporation Limited................................................................................................6 B. General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation ........................................8 C. The Proposed Transaction ........................................................................................................9 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND PUBLIC INTEREST FRAMEWORK........................................15 IV. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNICATIONS ACT AND COMMISSION RULES AND POLICIES...................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SES-02292 Wednesday August 12, 2020 Satellite Communications Services Information re: Actions Taken The Commission, by its International Bureau, took the following actions pursuant to delegated authority. The effective dates of the actions are the dates specified. SES-ASG-20200709-00734 E E100094 Bresnan Communications, LLC Application for Consent to Assignment Consummated Date Effective: 07/09/2020 Current Licensee: Bresnan Communications, LLC FROM: Charter Communications Operating, LLC TO: Spectrum Pacific West, LLC No. of Station(s) listed: 3 SES-ASG-20200714-00744 E E191180 Eureka Broadcasting Co., Inc. Application for Consent to Assignment Grant of Authority Date Effective: 08/05/2020 Current Licensee: Eureka Broadcasting Co., Inc. FROM: Eureka Broadcasting Co., Inc. TO: Bicoastal Media Licenses II, LLC No. of Station(s) listed: 1 SES-ASG-20200715-00745 E E180219 Marquee Broadcasting Georgia, Inc. Application for Consent to Assignment Grant of Authority Date Effective: 08/05/2020 Current Licensee: SUNBELT-SOUTH TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, LTC FROM: SUNBELT-SOUTH TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. TO: Marquee Broadcasting Georgia, Inc. No. of Station(s) listed: 1 Page 1 of 101 SES-ASG-20200716-00751 E E200443 Sandhills Broadcasting Group, LLC Application for Consent to Assignment Consummated Date Effective: 07/16/2020 Current Licensee: WWGP BROADCASTING CORPORATION FROM: WWGP Broadcasting Corporation TO: Sandhills Broadcasting Group, LLC No. of Station(s) listed: 1 SES-ASG-20200716-00752 E E191505 Legacy Communications, LLC Application for Consent to Assignment Grant of Authority Date Effective: 08/05/2020 Current Licensee: Legacy Communications, LLC FROM: Legacy Communications, LLC TO: Nebraska Rural Radio Association No.
    [Show full text]
  • The City Is Divided Into Many Neighborhoods, Many of Which Were Towns That Were Annexed by the Growing City
    The city is divided into many neighborhoods, many of which were towns that were annexed by the growing city. There are also several independent cities in and around Los Angeles, but they are popularly grouped with the city of Los Angeles, either due to being completely engulfed as enclaves by Los Angeles, or lying within its immediate vicinity. Generally, the city is divided into the following areas: Downtown Los Angeles, Northeast - including Highland Park and Eagle Rock areas, the Eastside, South Los Angeles (still often colloquially referred to as South Central by locals), the Harbor Area, Hollywood, Wilshire, the Westside, and the San Fernando and Crescenta Valleys. Some well-known communities of Los Angeles include West Adams, Watts, Venice Beach, the Downtown Financial District, Los Feliz, Silver Lake, Hollywood, Hancock Park, Koreatown, Westwood and the more affluent areas of Bel Air, Benedict Canyon, Hollywood Hills, Pacific Palisades, and Brentwood. [edit] Landmarks Important landmarks in Los Angeles include Chinatown, Koreatown, Little Tokyo, Walt Disney Concert Hall, Kodak Theatre, Griffith Observatory, Getty Center, Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Grauman's Chinese Theatre, Hollywood Sign, Hollywood Boulevard, Capitol Records Tower, Los Angeles City Hall, Hollywood Bowl, Watts Towers, Staples Center, Dodger Stadium and La Placita Olvera/Olvera Street. Downtown Los Angeles Skyline of downtown Los Angeles Downtown Los Angeles is the central business district of Los Angeles, California, United States, located close to the geographic center of the metropolitan area. The area features many of the city's major arts institutions and sports facilities, a variety of skyscrapers and associated large multinational corporations and an array of public art, unique shopping opportunities and the hub of the city's freeway and public transportation networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenarios for the Network Neutrality Arms Race
    International Journal of Communication 1 (2007), 607-643 1932-8036/20070607 Scenarios for the Network Neutrality Arms Race WILLIAM H. LEHR SHARON E. GILLETT Massachusetts Institute of Technology MARVIN A. SIRBU JON M. PEHA Carnegie Mellon University Several factors suggest that meaningful network neutrality rules will not be enshrined in near-term U.S. telecommunications policy. These include disagreements over the need for such rules as well as their definition, efficacy and enforceability. However, as van Schewick (2005)1 has demonstrated in the context of the Internet, network providers may have economic incentives to discriminate in welfare-reducing ways; in addition, network operators may continue to possess market power, particularly with respect to a terminating monopoly.2 On the other hand, the literature on two-sided markets,3 the challenge of cost-recovery in the presence of significant fixed and sunk costs, and the changing nature of Internet traffic all provide efficiency-enhancing rationales for William H. Lehr: [email protected] Sharon E. Gillett: [email protected] Marvin A. Sirbu: [email protected] Jon M. Peha: [email protected] Date submitted: 2007-06-07 1 See van Schewick, Barbara (2005), "Towards an Economic Framework for Network Neutrality Regulation," Paper presented at the 33rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC 2005), George Mason Law School, Arlington VA, September 2005, available at: http://web.si.umich.edu/tprc/papers/2005/483/van%20Schewick%20Network%20Neutrality%20TPRC%2 02005.pdf 2 These problems arise even if the access provider is not dominant in other respects. See DeGraba, P., “Bill and Keep at the Central Office as the Efficient Interconnection Regime,” U.S., FCC OPP Working Paper 33, (2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Office Work
    This cityLAB + Gensler Los Angeles publication insti- V1 gates a new conversation about the future of office work, office buildings, and their impacts on downtown The Future of Off ice Work Off of Future The Los Angeles. This instigation takes place during an era of urban resurgence in the city and increased mobility in contemporary life. Los Angeles can be considered both America’s last industrial, railroad city and its first post-industrial, automobile-centered city. As such, the trajectory of downtown Los Angeles’s future potentially charts the future of other American downtowns— especially those in the West and in the Sunbelt. Office work in Los Angeles has been sheltered by multiple versions of the mono-functional office building, both high and low-rise, situated within many different settings; from the office parks and low-rise industrial buildings of the San Fernando and San Gabriel Valleys, to the landscape of logistics that is the Port of Los Angeles, to the autotopia of Century City, to the creative offices spaces of the Westside, and to work- live spaces in a re-imagined downtown. The variety of Los Angeles’s office landscape is the result of decades of architectural experimentation, and, according to some boosters, has contributed to its resilience to broad economic change. The reimagining that continues to transform Los Angeles’s central business district into downtown Los Angeles does so by reconfiguring the regimes of time, place, and selves that set the temporal and spatial definitions of work downtown, and in particular, the kind of downtown work most often labeled “office work”.
    [Show full text]
  • 2338 E 8Th St Redevelopment Site Los Angeles, CA CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT OFFERING PROCEDURE
    Arts District Opportunity Zone 2338 E 8th St Redevelopment Site Los Angeles, CA CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT OFFERING PROCEDURE Colliers International Greater Los Angeles, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, The Registered Potential Purchaser and such Related Parties shall be informed The Registered Potential Purchaser acknowledges that the Property has been (COLLIERS) has been retained by 2338 E 8th Street on an exclusive basis to by COLLIERS of the confidential nature of the Informational Materials and offered for sale, subject to withdrawal from the market, change in offering act as agent with respect to the potential sale of approximately 12,729 square must agree to keep all Information Materials strictly confidential in accordance price, prior sale or rejection of any offer because of the terms thereof, lack of feet located in the County of Los Angeles, California at 2338 E 8th Street, in the to the agreement. The Registered Potential Purchaser understands and satisfactory credit references of any prospective Purchaser or for any other city of Los Angeles, California and as described herein with all improvements acknowledges that COLLIERS and the Owner do not make any representation reason, whatsoever, without notice. now or hereafter made on or to the real property (collectively, the “Property”). or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the Informational Materials Ownership parties have directed that all inquiries and communications with and that the information used in the preparation of the Informational Materials The Registered Potential Purchaser acknowledges that the Property is being respect to the contemplated sale of the Property be directed to COLLIERS. was furnished to COLLIERS by others and has not been independently verified offered without regard to race, creed, sex, religion, or national origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 2019 Market Report
    FIRST QUARTER, 2OI9 DOWNTOWN LA MARKET REPORT Photo by Hunter Kerhart Q1 2019 MARKET REPORT ABOUT THE DCBID Founded in 1998, the Downtown Center Business Improvement District (DCBID) is a coalition of nearly 2,000 property owners in the central business district, united in their commitment to enhance the quality of life in the area. The organization has been a catalyst in the transformation of the Downtown Center District, turning it into a vibrant 24/7 destination. The mission of the Economic Development team is to improve and revitalize the District, and bring investment and new businesses to the area. We provide services to current and prospective residents, workers and businesses, including: • Development Consulting • Research and Information Requests • Events and Marketing • Monthly Housing and Office Tours • Customized Tours and Reports Whether you need information on new development, introductions to local decision-makers and influencers, or you just want to learn more about Downtown’s dynamic growth, we are the portal for information about the District and DTLA. To learn more about Downtown’s Renaissance and how to join us, visit www.DowntownLA.com. DEFINITION OF DOWNTOWN LA The DCBID defines Downtown Los Angeles as the area bounded by the 110, 101 and 10 freeways and the LA River, plus Chinatown, City West, and Exposition Park. The projects contained in this report are within a portion of Downtown Los Angeles, shown on the map to the left. 2 Downtown Center Business Improvement District Q1 2019 MARKET REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................ 4 MARKET OVERVIEW Residential ........................................................ 6 Office ................................................................. 7 8 Significant Sales ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Five Year Implementation Plan
    COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area (Amended) FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FY2008 - FY2010 (July 18, 2010) REQUIRED BY HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33490 ADOPTED: November 1, 2007 _____________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE I. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA INFORMATION 3 A. Project Area Context and Background B. Conditions at Time of Adoption of Redevelopment Plan C. CRA/LA’s Goals and Objectives for the Redevelopment Project Area II. PROJECT AREA ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PREVIOUS 5-YEAR PERIOD 6 A. Economic Development Programs/Projects B. Affordable Housing Program C. Strategic Plans and Studies D. Public Improvement Projects and Programs E. Art Program F. Administrative Expenditures III. ACTIVITY REPORT ON THE NEXT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PERIOD 14 A. Economic Development Programs/Projects B. Affordable Housing Program C. Strategic Plans and Studies D. Public Improvement Projects and Programs E. Art Program F. Administrative Expenditures IV. AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM 25 A. Implementation Plan Requirements B. Historical Affordable Housing Activities C. Housing Goals and Objectives of Implementation Plan D. Applicable Low and Moderate Income Requirements E. Use of Low to Moderate Income Housing Funds V. NEXT STEPS 32 A. Public Hearing on Progress B. Expiration of Time Limits VI. EXHIBITS 33 A. Map of Central Business District (Amended) Project Area B. Housing Production Inventory IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR FY2008 - FY2010 (July 18, 2010) Page 2 of 34 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (AMENDED) I. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA INFORMATION A. PROJECT AREA CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND In 1975, the CRA/LA and City Council adopted the CBD Redevelopment Plan, encompassing a 1,549-acre area in the heart of Downtown generally bounded by the 10, 110 and 101 Freeways, and Wall, Maple, 7th and Alameda Streets.
    [Show full text]