Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings March 2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Management Crossings SafetyLevel Risks at of Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings March 2010 Victorian Auditor-General’s Report March 2010 2009-10:18 2009-10:18 Level 24 Telephone 61 3 8601 7000 35 Collins Street Facsimile 61 3 8601 7010 Melbourne Vic. 3000 www.audit.vic.gov.au V I C T O R I A Victorian Auditor-General Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings Ordered to be printed VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER March 2010 PP No 289, Session 2006–10 This report has been produced to ISO14001 environmental standards. It is printed on FSC credited Novatech Satin & Media Print Silk paper. The print supplier, Blue Star PRINT has initiated an EMS promoting minimisation of environmental impact through the deployment of efficient technology, rigorous quality management procedures and a philosophy of reduce, re-use and recycle. ISBN 978 1 921650 28 4 The Hon. Robert Smith MLC The Hon. Jenny Lindell MP President Speaker Legislative Council Legislative Assembly Parliament House Parliament House Melbourne Melbourne Dear Presiding Officers Under the provisions of section 16AB of the Audit Act 1994, I transmit my report on Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings. Yours faithfully D D R PEARSON Auditor-General 24 March 2010 Victorian Auditor-General’s Report Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings iii Contents Audit summary............................................................................................vii Background.............................................................................................................vii Conclusion ..............................................................................................................vii Findings ................................................................................................................. viii Recommendations...................................................................................................ix Audit Act 1994 section 16—submissions and comments............................ xi Introduction ..............................................................................................................xi Submissions and comments received .....................................................................xi 1. Background .............................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction......................................................................................................1 1.2 The Towards Zero strategy ............................................................................. 2 1.3 Roles and responsibilities................................................................................ 2 1.4 Audit scope and objectives.............................................................................. 5 1.5 Structure of report ........................................................................................... 5 2. Risk management framework..................................................................7 2.1 Introduction......................................................................................................8 2.2 Conclusion....................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Findings........................................................................................................... 8 3. Measuring and improving safety outcomes............................................19 3.1 Introduction....................................................................................................20 3.2 Conclusion..................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Findings......................................................................................................... 20 Appendix A. Audit Act 1994 section 16—submissions and comments.......33 Victorian Auditor-General’s Report Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings v Audit summary Background The audit examined the rate of progress in improving safety and reducing accidents at level crossings by assessing the management of these risks and the effectiveness of the treatments to address them. Most level crossing collisions happen because pedestrians or drivers are unaware of an approaching train, misjudge its arrival at the crossing, choose to ignore warning signals, or deliberately avoid the barriers designed to protect them. Physically separating or closing roads and footpaths that cross railway tracks would solve the problem. However, the costs of doing this and the impact on the mobility of the people affected, mean these solutions will be the exception rather than the rule. Managing safety risks is a shared responsibility between the rail and road organisations that manage, government agencies that oversee and regulate, and the people who use, level crossings. The Minister for Public Transport released the 10-year Towards Zero strategy in November 2009. Its objective is to reduce deaths and injuries and ultimately to achieve the goal that no lives are lost through accidents at level crossings. Between 2000–01 and 2008–09 level crossing accidents caused 73 deaths, an average of eight per year. While this is minimal compared with the road toll of about 300 deaths annually, these events are catastrophic for the people affected. There is also a risk of a level crossing collision where many people are killed and seriously injured. This happened when a goods vehicle hit a passenger train in June 2007 at Kerang in regional Victoria, killing 11 people and seriously injuring 12. The damage, beyond loss of life, can amount to millions of dollars. Conclusion The rate of progress in improving safety and reducing accidents has been satisfactory. There are, however, elements of the risk management framework and its application that can be improved. Victorian Auditor-General’s Report Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings vii Audit summary Findings Risk management framework The Victorian Railway Crossing Safety Steering Committee and the use of an evidence-based approach to assess and prioritise risks are important parts of the risk-management framework. These have set the scene for better management of level crossing safety. There is, however, room to strengthen the framework’s effectiveness by: • improving how the committee is informed of the views of the rail managers, who run train services and maintain the infrastructure, about their risks and priorities • assembling information that will allow the committee to effectively manage and monitor the delivery of the Towards Zero strategy • improving the understanding of what causes level crossing collisions. Measuring and improving the safety outcomes The decline in level crossing collisions over the past 10 years suggests that the department’s actions have improved level crossing safety when it is recognised that risk of conflict between road traffic and trains has risen with increased volumes. The department needs to improve how it measures and reports on the cost-effectiveness of the committee’s programs. The department does not have an accurate grasp of the cost-effectiveness of the treatments it deploys. Whilst it mostly understands the costs, it has not adequately evaluated the benefits. The department has acted to improve in this area by commissioning research and starting to apply the recommendations about how it evaluates treatments. The department has not adequately assessed treatments before their deployment, or once deployed, evaluated them. This means it has only a partial understanding of the realised benefits. There is a clear inconsistency in the way VicTrack and V/Line calculate what they charge the department for level crossing upgrades. The department needs to understand the differences to gain assurance about the cost-efficiency of the upgrades it funds. The information the department publishes is not sufficient to understand how its plans and programs are progressing and how successful they have been in delivering on the department’s objectives. viii Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings Victorian Auditor-General’s Report Audit summary Recommendations Number Recommendation Page The Department of Transport should: 1. Work with the rail managers to strengthen the processes it 18 uses to inform the committee about the rail managers’ views when making decisions about level crossing priorities and upgrades. 2. Lead the road and rail managers to develop a detailed, 18 three-year plan that provides an adequate basis for managing and monitoring the Towards Zero strategy. 3. With Public Transport Safety Victoria’s support, agree on 18 and document the actions needed to deliver a better understanding of level crossing collisions as part of the detailed plan underpinning the Towards Zero strategy. 4. Review the legislation and develop recommendations to 18 improve the effectiveness of the level crossing closure process. 5. Understand why the charges for level crossing upgrades 32 completed by different organisations have varied, with the view to improving efficiency. 6. Publish an analysis of the issues raised by its survey of 32 level crossings, identifying the works required, agency responsible and an estimate of the cost. 7. Improve the approach to assessing risk mitigation 32 treatments before their deployment and evaluating treatments once deployed. 8. Improve the way it reports on level crossing safety. 32 Victorian Auditor-General’s Report Management of Safety Risks at Level Crossings ix Audit