Advanced Manufacturing 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advanced Manufacturing 2016 ADVANCED MANUFACTURING 2016 THE COLUMBIA-WILLAMETTE WORKFORCE COLLABORATIVE Working together to support and develop regional talent. ABOUT THE COLUMBIA-WILLAMETTE WORKFORCE COLLABORATIVE The Columbia-Willamette Workforce Collaborative (Collaborative) is a partnership between the Clackamas Workforce Partnership, Workforce Southwest Washington (formerly Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council) and Worksystems: the three Workforce Development Boards covering the Portland-Vancouver Metropolitan Area. The Collaborative delivers a unified approach to serving industry, supporting economic development, and guiding public workforce training investments to better address the needs of our combined labor shed. We know that people are willing to travel throughout the region for the best opportunities and that employers need the most qualified workers regardless of where they live. By working together, we can cultivate our regional talent pool and build the foundation for a strong economy. ABOUT THIS REPORT The Collaborative is focused on aligning and investing resources to support the workforce needs of four sectors: Advanced Manufacturing, Health Care, Software/IT, and Construction. Sectors are chosen based on factors such as their economic significance to the region, current number of openings and job growth projections, average wages that support self-sufficiency, and career ladder opportunities across the skill continuum. By examining labor market intelligence (such as the data contained in this report) and vetting the information with business partners, we are able to better understand industry trends, identify current and emergent workforce needs, and develop customized solutions for each sector. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Much of the data in this report was provided by the Oregon Employment Department and the Washington Employment Security Department, key partners in the region’s workforce development system. The Collaborative is dedicated to assuring this information is regularly updated and presented in a way that advances the region’s capacity to understand and align regional workforce supply with business demand in key industry sectors. OVERVIEW With nearly 100,000 jobs and a payroll of $7.6 ADVANCED MANUFACTURING billion, Advanced Manufacturing accounts for 10 EMPLOYMENT BY COMPONENT percent of the greater Portland region’s private- GREATER PORTLAND REGION: 2015 sector employment and 15 percent of payroll. The region’s economy is highly dependent on the manufacturing sector. In 2014, the Portland Metro Area ranked third nationally among the nation’s High Tech Manufacturing Food Processing largest metro areas in the proportion of its GDP 42,600; 44% 15,000; 16% generated by manufacturing: 30 percent compared to 12 percent nationally. The Advanced Manufacturing sector includes high Metals, Machinery, & Transportation 38,500; tech, metals, machinery, transportation equipment, 40% and food processing. Source: EMSI ADVANCED MANUFACTURING JOBS BY COUNTY GREATER PORTLAND REGION: 2015 Nearly half of the region’s Advanced Manufacturing jobs are located in Washington County, due largely to Clackamas Intel. 14,300; 15% Multnomah Multnomah County has a small concentration of jobs 25,700; 27% Clark relative to the overall size of its economy. 8,800; 9% Clackamas County, with 14,300 jobs, accounts Yamhill 4,700; for 15 percent of the region’s employment, and Washington 5% 39,600; 41% Southwest Washington chips in 2,700 jobs (3%). Companies tend to be clustered along major road, Remainder* water, and rail transportation corridors. 3,100; 3% Source: EMSI *Columbia, Cowlitz, Skamania, Yamhill, Wahkiakum counties Sector Report: Advanced Manufacturing 1 FIRM CHARACTERISTICS FIRMS BY SIZE IN GREATER PORTLAND REGION: 2015 70% The sector has more large firms and fewer smaller 60% firms compared to the overall economy. Advanced Manufacturing 50% All Industries (private sector) The average firm size is over three times larger than 40% the average company in the region: 43 employees 30% per company versus 15 across all industries. Share of Total 20% More than half of the region’s Advanced 10% Manufacturing employment is in establishments 0% employing more than 250 people. 1-4 5-9 10-19 20-49 50-99 100 or more Firm Size (# of employees) Source: Oregon Employment Department, Washington Employment Security Department MAJOR EMPLOYERS Intel, the region's largest private-sector employer, MAJOR EMPLOYERS: ADVANCED MANUFACTURING had an economic impact totaling $26.8 billion in 2012 (source: EcoNorthwest). Although not Blount International Oregon Iron Works headquartered in the region, Intel’s Washington Inc. PDM Steel Service Centers County campuses comprise the company’s largest Bob’s Red Mill Natural Precision Castparts/PCC Foods and most advanced operations in the world. Structurals Boeing Reser’s Fine Foods Inc. C-Tech Industries Major ‘home grown’ or locally headquartered Rockwell Collins Aerospace Daimler Trucks & Electronics, Inc. companies include Blount (recently sold but still Electro Scientific Sharp Microelectronics headquartered here), ESCO, Leatherman, Electro Industries Inc. Siltronic Corporation Scientific (ESI), Cascade Steel, Reser’s, Tektronix, Foster Farms Steelscape, Inc. and Oregon Iron Works. Gunderson Tektronix Intel Corporation TriQuint The region’s Advanced Manufacturing firms produce KapStone United States Bakery a wide variety of products including semiconductors, Leatherman Tool Group, Viasystems (Merix) streetcars, engine parts, electrical vehicle chargers Inc. Vigor Marine and oscillopes. LifePort, Inc. WaferTech Linear Technology Waite Specialty Machine Mondelez International Inc. (formerly Kraft Foods) Weyerhaeuser Norpac LLC Xerox Corporation Neil Jones Food Co Source: Equifax (EMSI), The Business Journal, The Oregonian 2 Columbia-Willamette Workforce Collaborative CONCENTRATION LOCATION QUOTIENTS Location quotients are used to ADVANCED MANUFACTURING AND COMPONENTS measure a sector’s employment GREATER PORTLAND REGION: 2014 concentration in an area. A 3.50 figure greater than one indicates a higher concentration of 3.00 3.00 employment relative to the nation. A location quotient greater than 1 2.50 indicates an industry with a higher concentration of employment relative to the nation. Advanced Manufacturing 2.00 comprises a larger share of 1.41 1.50 employment in the greater 1.19 Portland region compared to 1.00 0.89 the U.S. due primarily to the high tech component, where 0.50 employment is three times as concentrated as the nation. 0.00 Advanced High Tech Food Metals, Machinery, Manufacturing Manufacturing Processing & Transportation The greater Portland region Source: Oregon Employment Dept.; Washington Employment Security Dept., U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has a competitive advantage in Advanced Manufacturing and is a net exporter of goods, driven by computer and electronic products, and metals. EXPORTING PORTLAND METRO AREA EXPORTS: 2014 Exports are critical to the region’s economy. According to the Brookings Institution, total exports directly supported more than 94,000 jobs in the High Tech metro area in 2014. Manufacturing (incl. royalties) Advanced Advanced Manufacturing accounted for 80 percent Remainder Manufacturing 70% 20% 80% of All of the Portland Metropolitan Area’s total exports; Exports the largest share among the nation’s 100 largest Metals, Mach. & metro areas. Exports are dominated by computer Transport. 9% equipment. Food Processing 1% Source: The Brookings Institution The metro area’s Gross Domestic Product grew by 5.8 percent in 2014, driven by a 6.6 percent growth in the manufacturing sector, the 13th fastest in the nation. Sector Report: Advanced Manufacturing 3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS ADVANCED MANUFACTURING ANNUAL GROWTH RATES GREATER PORTLAND REGION VS. UNITED STATES 8% Advanced Manufacturing is a 6% cyclical industry, both locally and 4% nationally. 2% 0% The Advanced Manufacturing -2% sector in the greater Portland -4% Greater Portland Region region consistently outperforms -6% United States the nation. -8% -10% The sector was hit hard during -12% the Great Recession, losing 12 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 percent of its employment base Source: EMSI (11,600 jobs). However, the sector propelled the region out of the recession, growing nearly twice as fast as the rest of the economy between 2010 and 2012. ADVANCED MANUFACTURING’S SHARE OF EMPLOYMENT GREATER PORTLAND REGION AND U.S. 12% Although Advanced 11% Manufacturing is declining as a share of total employment, the 10% Portland region continues to have 9% a much greater share compared Greater Portland Region U.S. to the nation. 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: Oregon Employment Dept.; Washington Employment Security Dept., U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 4 Columbia-Willamette Workforce Collaborative CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WORKFORCE ADVANCED MANUFACTURING EMPLOYMENT BY AGE GREATER PORTLAND REGION: 2014 30% Half of the region’s Advanced Advanced Manufacturing Manufacturing workforce is 45 25% years or older. All Other Industries 20% The workforce is aging. It is projected that over the next 15% decade, employers will need to fill more than 30,000 vacancies 10% due just to retirements. 5% Youth employment is half that of the overall economy (5.4% vs. 0% 11.9%). 14–18 19–24 25–34 35–44 45–54 55–64 65–99 Source: U.S. Census Bureau; Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics ADVANCED MANUFACTURING EMPLOYMENT BY GENDER GREATER PORTLAND REGION: 2014 80% Advanced Manufacturing The Advanced
Recommended publications
  • 509 22,233 51%
    METALS & MACHINERY Benchmade A Manufacturing Powerhouse Greater Portland is home to firms that manufacture highly specialized products, including Freightliners from Daimler Trucks, passenger ferries and cargo ships at Vigor Industrial, and aerospace parts from Boeing. Other Portland-area firms include Schnitzer Steel and Precision Castparts. The region’s metals and machinery sector is outperforming its national peers in job growth by 10 percent. INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT 509 Total number of establishments 22,233 Total employment in metals and machinery industries 51% Manufacturers in Oregon account for 22%, or Employment growth versus $49.4 billion, of the state’s total economic output. the national average TOP METALS + MACHINERY FIRMS IN GREATER PORTLAND 10% Job growth outperforming Precision Castparts Vigor Industrial Leatherman Tool national peers in metals and Corp. 1,230 employees Group machinery sector. 3,849 employees 503 employees Greenbrier Schnitzer Steel 1,103 employees EVRAZ North 3,183 employees America A-dec 450 employees Daimler Trucks North 1,100 employees America Blount International 3,000 employees 527 employees The Boeing Company 1,500 employees —PBJ Book of Lists, 2019 SUCCESS STORIES BOEING OREGON MANUFACTURING The aerospace company employs over 1,500 at its plant INNOVATION CENTER in Gresham, where it makes parts for its jets. These parts The Oregon Manufacturing Innovation Center (OMIC) include a component used to extend and retract wing is a partnership between industry leaders, research flaps during flight. This is Boeing’s largest machine shop institutions and local agencies that provides advanced and provides components to every Boeing aircraft. technical training for the region’s workforce while developing new tools, techniques and technologies that PRECISION CASTPARTS address real-world manufacturing challenges facing the Founded in 1953, Portland-based Precision Castparts industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Port of Portland's Marine Operations
    The Port of Portland’s Marine Operations The Local Economic Benefits of Worldwide Trade Prepared for: August 2013 Contact Information Ed MacMullan, John Tapogna, Sarah Reich, and Tessa Krebs of ECONorthwest prepared this report. ECONorthwest is solely responsible for its content. ECONorthwest specializes in economics, planning, and finance. Established in 1974, ECONorthwest has over three decades of experience helping clients make sound decisions based on rigorous economic, planning and financial analysis. For more information about ECONorthwest, visit our website at www.econw.com. For more information about this report, please contact: Ed MacMullan Senior Economist 99 W. 10th Ave., Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401 541-687-0051 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... ES-1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2 Global Trade, Local Benefits ...................................................................................... 3 3 Intermodal Transportation Efficiencies .................................................................... 9 4 The Auto-Transport Story .......................................................................................... 10 5 The Potash Story ........................................................................................................ 12 6 The Portland Shipyard Story ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NWLP-02-02-07.Pdf (5.155Mb)
    See Inside MEETING NOTICES Page 6 Volume 108 Number 3 February 2, 2007 Portland FFacingacing thethe comingcoming laborlabor shortageshortage same time require that remaining Unions say they want workers have higher-level skills. to train younger “New technologies are really changing the workplace,” said Lita workers, but often- Colligan, workforce policy adviser to times feel ignored Governor Ted Kulongoski, “and with baby boomers retiring in the next few Attorney Jim Egan of Albany leads a workshop on Oregon’s workers’compensation insurance system. By DON McINTOSH years, we don’t have a pipeline of Associate Editor skilled workers to take those jobs.” Oregon’s business community is That’s the message State Rep. Brad ANNUAL OREGON LABOR LAW CONFERENCE sounding an alarm about a looming Witt has been hearing, loudly. Witt, shortage in skilled labor, but it’s not who served 14 years as secretary-treas- clear to what extent government efforts urer of the Oregon AFL-CIO, became BLOSSOMS INTO A CROWD OF NEARLY 250 in “workforce development” will be chair of the House Workforce and Eco- What started 11 years ago as an intimate gath- panel for that discussion featured Richard Ahearn, regional able to solve the problem. Oregon nomic Development Committee at the ering of about 30 union leaders eager to learn more director of the NLRB for Region 19, and attorneys from unions, for their part, have been eager beginning of the year. His committee about state and federal labor laws has blossomed both labor and management. and willing to partner in efforts to im- held several weeks of hearings in Janu- into a conference of nearly 250 union leaders, Malbin said the goal is to keep registration affordable prove worker skills, but feel like they ary to listen to business and labor about business agents, shop stewards and organizers who while offering useful information that union staffers can uti- too often get left out of plans for work- what the Legislature could do to in- have overflowed the venue.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Trimet/City of Portland Bureau of Transportation Technical
    FINAL TriMet/City of Portland Bureau of Transportation Technical Capacity and Capability Review of Oregon Iron Works August 17, 2010 by LTK Engineering Services Technical Capacity and Capability Review of Oregon Iron Works Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction and Background ................................................................................................3 1.1 Purpose.........................................................................................................................3 1.2 Review Team ................................................................................................................4 1.3 Methodology..................................................................................................................4 2. Company Overview...............................................................................................................5 2.1 History and Scale of Operations....................................................................................5 2.2 Facilities ........................................................................................................................5 2.3 Products ........................................................................................................................5 2.4 Organization and Subsidiaries ......................................................................................6 3. Physical Plant and Equipment ..............................................................................................8 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Design Development Standards January 2019 Revision History
    Design Development Standards January 2019 Revision History Revision Revision date Details 1.0 2.25.2019 DRAFT Design Development Standards 2019 Version 1.0 Contents 1.0 General ........................................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Climate and Environmental Conditions .................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 System Technology Description ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Codes and Standards ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 Operations............................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 General .................................................................................................................................................................................11 2.2 Safety & Security .............................................................................................................................................................11 3.0 Track Alignment
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet Streetcar Prototype Final Report
    TriMet Streetcar Prototype Final Report JANUARY 2015 FTA Report No. 0085 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY TriMet City of Portland Portland Streetcar, Inc. COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Casey Ailes. DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. TriMet Streetcar Prototype Final Report JANUARY 2015 FTA Report No. 0085 PREPARED BY TriMet 1800 S. W. First Avenue Portland, OR 97201 City of Portland 1120 S. W. Fifth Avenue Portland, PR 97204 Portland Streetcar, Inc. 1031 N.W. 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97209 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE http://www.fta.dot.gov/research i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing Transit American Communities Finding Smarter, Cleaner, Faster Transportation Solutions
    Reinventing tRansit ameRican communities finding smaRteR, cleaneR, fasteR tRanspoRtation solutions Reinventing Transit AmericAn communities finding smArter, cleAner, fAster trAnsportAtion solutions Authors Edward Burgess Ashley Rood Acknowledgments Environmental Defense Fund would like to thank the following transit agency/ company staff for their time and cooperation in providing information for this report: Hugh Mose (CATA), Eric Marx (PRTC), Lisa Darnall (LYNX), Peter Varga (The Rapid), Andrea White (Bikestation), Julie Gustafson (Portland Streetcar Inc.), Bob Gibbons (Metro Transit), Jennifer Conover (MnDOT), Ed Bolden (Maplewood, NJ), Sally Stocker (NJTRANSIT), Andy Vobora (LTD), Ron Hughes (KART), and Dave Sotero (LA Metro). Robert Padgette from the American Public Transportation Association and Leslie Bellas from Intelligent Transportation Society of America both provided peer review, however the opinions expressed in this report are solely those of the authors. The following staff at Environmental Defense Fund also contributed to this report: Tom Elson, Mary Barber, Andy Darrell, Michael Replogle, and Peter Black. Our mission Environmental Defense Fund is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food and flour- ishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-effective and fair. Cover photos (clockwise from top left): Manufacturing streetcars in Portland, OR (photo courtesy Oregon Iron Works). DART light rail station in Dallas, TX (photo courtesy Dallas Area Rapid Transit). EmX bus rapid transit station in Eugene, OR (photo courtesy Lane Transit District). KART rural vanpool service in King County, CA (photo courtesy KART).
    [Show full text]
  • THE U.S. Manufacturer of Streetcars! Chandra Brown, President
    THETHE U.S.U.S. ManufacturerManufacturer ofof Streetcars!Streetcars! ChandraChandra Brown,Brown, PresidentPresident Oregon Iron Works, Inc. and United Streetcar, LLC. HISTORY & MISSION United Streetcar, LLC, is a newly formed subsidiary of Oregon Iron Works, Inc. (OIW). OIW is a specialized fabrication and manufacturing company founded in Oregon in 1944. United Streetcar’s mission is to provide modern, efficient, safe and reliable American- produced streetcars and to be a pioneering force in increasing urban transit options throughout the United States. UnitedUnited Streetcar,Streetcar, LLCLLC andand SkodaSkoda OIW has signed an exclusive technology transfer agreement with Skoda, from the Czech Republic. The agreement was signed in February 2006 and allows United Streetcar, LLC to offer the latest European technology in rail vehicle design, electric traction equipment and products for the United States. The vehicle design is for a three body, articulated, low floor streetcar and fully compatible with the current Portland Streetcar. The new streetcar will be manufactured in the US and will be fully compliant with the Buy-America Act. CityCity ofof PortlandPortland StreetcarStreetcar ContractContract The OIW-Skoda team was awarded the contract to manufacture the prototype vehicle for the City of Portland in compliance with the Buy-America Act. United Streetcar, LLC and Skoda look forward to a continued relationship with plans to produce the next generation of streetcars The new streetcar will use a (5 bodies, low floor streetcars) and wide variety of U.S. produced other transportation vehicles (light components with easy rail, trolleybuses, etc.). In addition, procurement, replacement United Streetcar, LLC and Skoda and service from United plan to provide electrical Streetcar, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet Streetcar Prototype, Final Report
    REPORT SUMMARY TriMet Streetcar Prototype Final Report Background This report documents the FTA-funded effort led by TriMet, the City of Portland (City), and Portland Streetcar, Inc. (PSI) to domestically manufacture a streetcar for operation in the Portland Streetcar system. Objectives The purpose of the grant was to increase the capability of domestic manufacturers in the business of supplying streetcars. Findings and Conclusions FTA’s funding and support for this effort has had a significant impact on the availability of domestically- manufactured streetcars for the growing U.S. market, increased the number of domestic suppliers of streetcar components, and extended the opportunities for Buy America-compliant suppliers. The report documents the initial process of producing the streetcar, the extension of the grant to support domestic manufacture of the propulsion system by Rockwell Automation, and operation in revenue service. Also included are a discussion of the market for streetcars in the U.S. and a history of streetcar manufacturing in the U.S. Oregon Iron Works (OIW) was selected through a competitive process to develop a prototype vehicle produced by a domestic manufacturer. The vehicle was completed in 2009. At that time, TriMet, the City, and PSI (as United Streetcar) proposed that the prototype be used to develop a domestic manufacturer for a propulsion system. United Streetcar and Rockwell Automation provided an upgrade for the propulsion system that is now in revenue service in the Portland Streetcar system. The vehicle
    [Show full text]
  • Oswego's Iron History
    OSWEGO’S IRON HISTORY 1865-1928 A Historical Look at the Iron Industry and Related Developments in Lake Oswego, Oregon The Oswego Iron Industry context statement is a result of a Preservation Planning Internship offered by the City of Lake Oswego. This study was funded in part by a grant from the National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior through the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act, 1966 as amended. Prepared for the City of Lake Oswego, Clackamas County, Oregon By Patience (Churchward) Stuart, Preservation Planning Intern, City of Lake Oswego August 31, 2010 For further information contact: Paul Espe Associate Planner, City of Lake Oswego 380 A Avenue, Lake Oswego, OR 97034 [email protected] (503) 697-6577 Lake Oswego Historic Resources Advisory Board (as of August 2010) Jeannie McGuire, Chair Marylou Colver, Vice Chair Tim Mather Joanne Naylor Craig Foster Kasey Holwerda Erin O’Rourke-Meadors Whitney Tolar (Youth Member) Mary Olson, Council Liaison August 2010 Oswego’s Iron Industry ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Lake Oswego Iron Industry context statement was researched and prepared by Patience (Churchward) Stuart, a Historic Preservation Master’s student from the University of Oregon under the guidance of Liz Carter, Historic Preservation Consultant and University of Oregon Adjunct Faculty, in conjunction with the City of Lake Oswego Planning Department. The internship began in the fall of the student’s second (final) year and lasted through the summer following graduation. Paul Espe, City Historic Preservation Planner, is greatly appreciated for his administration, advising, and support throughout the internship.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland-Milwaukie MAX Moving Forward
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 1 Winter 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Portland-Milwaukie MAX - Lou Bowerman...............................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Winter Work at the Museum Greg Bonn......................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member Sun Link Streetcar Roy Bonn.....................................................6 DC Streetcar Roy Bonn........................................................7 WES rail fan trip Roy Bonn.........................................................9 See this issue in color on line United Streetcar Roy Bonn......................................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Dave Rowe..........................................11 Portland-Milwaukie MAX Moving Forward By Louis Bowerman If you haven't taken the time to notice, the latest Portland- Milwaukie MAX line is quickly taking shape both on the Westside near the Marquam Bridge and the Eastside by OMSI and beyond to Milwaukie. With a totle length of 7.3 miles, and ten MAX stations starting in S.W. Portland close to Portland State University, the line crosses the Willamette River on a new bridge concept which will carry busses, MAX trains, Portland Streetcars, bikers and walkers but it will not The new transit bridge viewed from the east side, near OMSI. carry automobile traffic. Additionally, with completion of the new bridge, the final loop of the Portland Streetcar All photos by Lou Bowerman will be completed on the Eastside.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Into the Future with Aerospace & Defense
    FLYING INTO THE FUTURE WITH AEROSPACE & DEFENSE RESEARCH PREPARED FOR e Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge Innovations in Advanced Materials and Metals Manufacturing Project and e Greater Portland Export Initiative AUTHOR: DR. BETH FITZ GIBBON | DECEMBER 2014 THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER AN AWARD FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION | GRANT AWARD NUMBER 07 79 06921 “The Meeting 2011”; oil on canvas 60x36”, © 2014 Donna Steger “The Meeting 2011” depicts an early morning performance meeting, held at the Oregon National Guard’s Oregon Sustainment Maintenance Site (O.S.M.S) at Camp Withycombe in Clackamas, Oregon. Original Artwork reproduced with permission of the artist, Donna Steger: The Art Of Work As Works Of Art™ Flying into the Future with AEROSPACE & DEFENSE Research prepared for: Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge Grant, Innovations in Advanced Materials and Metals Manufacturing Project, and the Greater Portland Export Initiative Author: Dr. Beth Fitz Gibbon December 2014 This publication was prepared by the Columbia River Economic Development Council. The statements, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration. CONTENTS Preface 1 The U.S. Market 34 Executive Summary 2 Helicopters 45 Regional Voices & Views 7 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 49 Introduction 8 The Portland Regional Market 57 Commercial & Business Aircraft Sector 18 International Trade 72 Aerospace
    [Show full text]