Canine Thoracic Costovertebral and Costotransverse Joints: Three Case
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Anklyosed Spine: Fractures in DISH and Anklyosing Spondylitis
The Anklyosed Spine: Fractures in DISH and Anklyosing Spondylitis Lee F. Rogers, MD ACCR, Oct 26, 2012 Dallas, Texas Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are the most common diseases associated with spinal ankylosis. While they share the characteristic of ankylosis they are, in fact two separate diseases with distinct clinical, pathologic, and radiologic features. DISH: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis is a disease of older persons characterized by extensive ossification of the paraspinal ligaments anteriorly and laterally, bridging the intervening disc spaces. Bony bridging may be continuous or discontinuous. The anterior cortex of the vertebral body can be seen within the ossification. These findings are much more pronounced in the thoracic and lower cervical spine than in the lumbar area. Minor expressions of this disorder are commonly encountered in the mid-dorsal spine on lateral views of the chest. DISH characteristically spares the SI joints. The SI joints remain patent and clearly visible on radiographs or CT even in the presence of extensive disease in the thoracolumbar and cervical spine. DISH is also characterized by enthesopathy; ossification of ligaments or tendon insertions, forming so-called entheses. These appear as whiskering of the iliac crest, ischial tuberosites and greater trochanters. The radiographic appearance bears a superficial resemblance to that of AS. In DISH the spinal ossification is very irregular and unlike the thin, vertical syndesmophytes see in AS. The relative absence of changes in the lumbosacral spine, the patency of the SI joints, and absence of ankylosis of the facet and costovertebral joints should allow differentiation of DISH from AS. -
Ligaments of the Costovertebral Joints Including Biomechanics, Innervations, and Clinical Applications: a Comprehensive Review W
Open Access Review Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.874 Ligaments of the Costovertebral Joints including Biomechanics, Innervations, and Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Review with Application to Approaches to the Thoracic Spine Erfanul Saker 1 , Rachel A. Graham 2 , Renee Nicholas 3 , Anthony V. D’Antoni 2 , Marios Loukas 1 , Rod J. Oskouian 4 , R. Shane Tubbs 5 1. Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies 2. Department of Anatomy, The Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education 3. Department of Physical Therapy, Samford University 4. Neurosurgery, Complex Spine, Swedish Neuroscience Institute 5. Neurosurgery, Seattle Science Foundation Corresponding author: Erfanul Saker, [email protected] Abstract Few studies have examined the costovertebral joint and its ligaments in detail. Therefore, the following review was performed to better elucidate their anatomy, function and involvement in pathology. Standard search engines were used to find studies concerning the costovertebral joints and ligaments. These often- overlooked ligaments of the body serve important functions in maintaining appropriate alignment between the ribs and spine. With an increasing interest in minimally invasive approaches to the thoracic spine and an improved understanding of the function and innervation of these ligaments, surgeons and clinicians should have a good working knowledge of these structures. Categories: Neurosurgery, Orthopedics, Rheumatology Keywords: costovertebral joint, spine, anatomy, thoracic Introduction And Background The costovertebral joint ligaments are relatively unknown and frequently overlooked anatomical structures [1]. Although small and short in size, they are abundant, comprising 108 costovertebral ligaments in the normal human thoracic spine, and they are essential to its stability and function [2-3]. -
Chapter 21 Fractures of the Upper Thoracic Spine: Approaches and Surgical Management
Chapter 21 Fractures of the Upper Thoracic Spine: Approaches and Surgical Management Sean D Christie, M.D., John Song, M.D., and Richard G Fessler, M.D., Ph.D. INTRODUCTION Fractures occurring in the thoracic region account for approximately 17 to 23% of all traumatic spinal fractures (1), with 22% of traumatic spinal fractures occurring between T1 and T4 (16). More than half of these fractures result in neurological injury, and almost three-quarters of those impaired suffer from complete paralysis. Obtaining surgical access to the anterior vertebral elements of the upper thoracic vertebrae (T1–T6) presents a unique anatomic challenge. The thoracic cage, which narrows significantly as it approaches the thoracic inlet, has an intimate association between the vertebral column and the superior mediastinal structures. The supraclavicular, transmanubrial, transthoracic, and lateral parascapular extrapleural approaches each provide access to the anterior vertebral elements of the upper thoracic vertebrae. However, each of these approaches has distinct advantages and disadvantages and their use should be tailored to each individual patient’s situation. This chapter reviews these surgical approaches. Traditional posterior approaches are illustrated in Figure 21.1, but will not be discussed in depth here. ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS AND STABILITY The upper thoracic spine possesses unique anatomic and biomechanical properties. The anterior aspects of the vertebral bodies are smaller than the posterior aspects, which contribute to the physiological kyphosis present in this region of the spine. Furthermore, this orientation results in a ventrally positioned axis of rotation, predisposing this region to compression injuries. The combination and interaction of the vertebral bodies, ribs, and sternum increase the inherent biomechanical stability of this segment of the spine to 2 to 3 times that of the thoracolumbar junction. -
Between Ligamentous Structures in the Thoracic Spine : a finite Element Investigation
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queensland University of Technology ePrints Archive This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for pub- lication in the following source: Little, J. Paige & Adam, Clayton J. (2011) Effects of surgical joint desta- bilization on load sharing between ligamentous structures in the thoracic spine : a finite element investigation. Clinical Biomechanics, 26(9), pp. 895-903. This file was downloaded from: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/48159/ c Copyright 2011 Elsevier Ltd. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the journal Clinical Biomechanics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, struc- tural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be re- flected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was sub- sequently published in Clinical Biomechanics 26 (2011) 895–903, DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.05.004 Notice: Changes introduced as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing and formatting may not be reflected in this document. For a definitive version of this work, please refer to the published source: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.05.004 *Manuscript (including title page & abstract) Effect of surgical joint destabilization on ligament load-sharing 1 Effects of surgical joint destabilization on load sharing 2 between ligamentous structures in the thoracic spine: A 3 Finite Element investigation 4 5 Authors: 6 J. -
Canine Thoracic Costovertebral and Costotransverse Joints Three Case Reports of Dysfunction and Manual Therapy Guidelines for A
Topics in Compan An Med 29 (2014) 1–5 Topical review Canine Thoracic Costovertebral and Costotransverse Joints: Three Case Reports of Dysfunction and Manual Therapy Guidelines for Assessment and Treatment of These Structures Laurie Edge-Hughes, BScPT, MAnimSt (Animal Physiotherapy), CAFCI, CCRTn Keywords: The costovertebral and costotransverse joints receive little attention in research. However, pain costovertebral associated with rib articulation dysfunction is reported to occur in human patients. The anatomic costotransverse structures of the canine rib joints and thoracic spine are similar to those of humans. As such, it is ribs physical therapy proposed that extrapolation from human physical therapy practice could be used for the assessment and rehabilitation treatment of the canine patient with presumed rib joint pain. This article presents 3 case studies that manual therapy demonstrate signs of rib dysfunction and successful treatment using primarily physical therapy manual techniques. General assessment and select treatment techniques are described. & 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The Canine Fitness Centre Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada nAddress reprint requests to Laurie Edge-Hughes, BScPT, MAnimSt (Animal Physiotherapy), CAFCI, CCRT, The Canine Fitness Centre Ltd, 509—42nd Ave SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2G 1Y7 E-mail: [email protected] The articular structures of the thorax comprise facet joints, the erect spine and further presented that in reviewing the literature, intervertebral disc, and costal joints. Little research has been they were unable to find mention of natural development of conducted on these joints in human or animal medicine. However, idiopathic scoliosis in quadrupeds; however, there are reports of clinical case presentations in human journals, manual therapy avian models and adolescent models in man. -
1 the Thoracic Wall I
AAA_C01 12/13/05 10:29 Page 8 1 The thoracic wall I Thoracic outlet (inlet) First rib Clavicle Suprasternal notch Manubrium 5 Third rib 1 2 Body of sternum Intercostal 4 space Xiphisternum Scalenus anterior Brachial Cervical Costal cartilage plexus rib Costal margin 3 Subclavian 1 Costochondral joint Floating ribs artery 2 Sternocostal joint Fig.1.3 3 Interchondral joint Bilateral cervical ribs. 4 Xiphisternal joint 5 Manubriosternal joint On the right side the brachial plexus (angle of Louis) is shown arching over the rib and stretching its lowest trunk Fig.1.1 The thoracic cage. The outlet (inlet) of the thorax is outlined Transverse process with facet for rib tubercle Demifacet for head of rib Head Neck Costovertebral T5 joint T6 Facet for Tubercle vertebral body Costotransverse joint Sternocostal joint Shaft 6th Angle rib Costochondral Subcostal groove joint Fig.1.2 Fig.1.4 A typical rib Joints of the thoracic cage 8 The thorax The thoracic wall I AAA_C01 12/13/05 10:29 Page 9 The thoracic cage Costal cartilages The thoracic cage is formed by the sternum and costal cartilages These are bars of hyaline cartilage which connect the upper in front, the vertebral column behind and the ribs and intercostal seven ribs directly to the sternum and the 8th, 9th and 10th ribs spaces laterally. to the cartilage immediately above. It is separated from the abdominal cavity by the diaphragm and communicates superiorly with the root of the neck through Joints of the thoracic cage (Figs 1.1 and 1.4) the thoracic inlet (Fig. -
The Lumbosacral Dorsal Rami of the Cat
J. Anat. (1976), 122, 3, pp. 653-662 653 With 1O figures Printed in Great Britain The lumbosacral dorsal rami of the cat NIKOLAI BOGDUK Department ofAnatomy, University ofSydney, Sydney, Australia (Accepted 2 December 1975) INTRODUCTION Several reflexes involving dorsal rami have been demonstrated in the cat (Pedersen, Blunck & Gardner, 1956; Bogduk & Munro, 1973). However, there is no adequate description in the literature of the anatomy of lumbosacral dorsal rami in this animal. The present study was therefore undertaken to provide such a description, hoping thereby to facilitate the design and interpretation of our own (Bogduk & Munro, 1973) and future research on reflexes involving lumbosacral dorsal rami, including reflexes possibly relevant to the understanding of back pain in man. These nerves are described in the present study in relation to a revised nomen- clature of the muscles in the dorsal lumbar region. Such a revision (Bogduk, 1975) was necessary because of the different nomenclatures and varied interpretations in the literature. METHODS Six laboratory cats (Felis domesticus) were embalmed with 10° formalin and studied by gross dissection. In addition, confirmatory observations were made on another 16 cats in the course of surgical procedures. Lateral branches of dorsal rami were first identified during reflexion of the skin and then during the resection of iliocostalis and longissimus lumborum. These branches were subsequently traced back to their origins from the dorsal rami, a dissecting microscope being used. The medial branches of the dorsal rami were then traced through the intertransversarii mediales into multifidus. Sinuvertebral nerves were also sought. Nerve roots were detached from the spinal cord before removing it from the vertebral canal. -
Background and Anatomy
BACKGROUND AND ANATOMY CASE REPORT BACKGROUND Painful musculoskeletal disorders in the region of the thoracic spine can be difficult to diagnose and treat. Imaging examinations are often negative or difficult to visualize, especially in instances of internal disc disruption, costovertebral arthropathies, and zygapophyseal joint problems.16,23,48,53,71 Knowledge of some of the distinctive anatomical features of this region, combined with information gathered in biomechanical studies2,6,11,15,35,43,44,55,61,62 can assist the clinician in isolating a painful structure (or structures) based on clinical examination. Because spinal metastases are most often seen in the thoracic spine,73,37 and because organic problems can cause musculoskeletal-like pain, it is important that the patient first undergo a thorough medical work up prior to visiting the physical therapist. When dealing with painful musculoskeletal conditions of the thoracic spine, there are a number of unique features to consider about this region. Anatomical construction of the thoracic spine makes it a rigid structure and, enhanced by the rib cage, it functions not only to protect the life-sustaining organs in the thorax, but it also serves as the foundation for movements of the head and extremities. The presence of the rib cage alone adds a number of possible sources of pain, such as pathology at the costovertebral (dorsal) and even cost-chondro-sternal (ventral) connections. The thoracic spine has the largest number of vertebrae of the three spinal regions. Morphological variation between the cranial and the caudal vertebrae is great, and this difference in morphology illustrates one of the primary functions of the thoracic spine, which is that of a transition “zone.” The cranial segments, (T1 to T4) and the caudal segments, (T8 to T12) have the appearance and the kinematic features similar to that of the cervical and lumbar spines, respectively. -
Effects of Different Angles of the Traction Table on Lumbar Spine Ligaments: a Finite Element Study Hekmat Farajpour, MS, Nima Jamshidi, Phd
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2017;9:480-488 • https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.480 Effects of Different Angles of the Traction Table on Lumbar Spine Ligaments: A Finite Element Study Hekmat Farajpour, MS, Nima Jamshidi, PhD Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran Background: The traction bed is a noninvasive device for treating lower back pain caused by herniated intervertebral discs. In this study, we investigated the impact of the traction bed on the lower back as a means of increasing the disc height and creating a gap between facet joints. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) images were obtained from a female volunteer and a three-dimensional (3D) model was cre- ated using software package MIMICs 17.0. Afterwards, the 3D model was analyzed in an analytical software (Abaqus 6.14). The study was conducted under the following traction loads: 25%, 45%, 55%, and 85% of the whole body weight in different angles. Results: Results indicated that the loading angle in the L3–4 area had 36.8%, 57.4%, 55.32%, 49.8%, and 52.15% effect on the anterior longitudinal ligament, posterior longitudinal ligament, intertransverse ligament, interspinous ligament, and supraspinous ligament, respectively. The respective values for the L4–5 area were 32.3%, 10.6%, 53.4%, 56.58%, and 57.35%. Also, the body weight had 63.2%, 42.6%, 44.68%, 50.2%, and 47.85% effect on the anterior longitudinal ligament, posterior longitudinal liga- ment, intertransverse ligament, interspinous ligament, and supraspinous ligament, respectively. The respective values for the L4–5 area were 67.7%, 89.4%, 46.6%, 43.42% and 42.65%. -
Anatomy of the Spine
Anatomy of the Spine Musculoskeletal block- Anatomy-lecture 4 Editing file Color guide : Objectives Only in boys slides in Blue Only in girls slides in Purple By the end of this lecture you should be able to: important in Red Doctor note in Green ✓ Distinguish and describe the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral and Extra information in Grey coccygeal vertebrae. ✓ Describe the vertebral curvatures. ✓ Describe the movement which occur in each region of the vertebral column. ✓ List the structures which connect 2 adjacent vertebrae together. ✓ List and identify the ligaments of the intervertebral joints. Spine or Vertebral Column ● The vertebral column extends from the skull to the pelvis. ● It surrounds and protects the spinal cord and supports the whole body. ● It is formed from 33 irregular vertebrae. It consists of 24 single vertebrae and 2 bones: •Sacrum, (5 fused vertebrae).(Convex) •Coccyx, (4 fused vertebrae). Of the 24 single bones, •7 Cervical vertebrae (concave) •12 Thoracic vertebrae(convex) •5 Lumbar vertebrae.(concave) The single vertebrae are separated by pads of flexible fibrocartilage called the intervertebral disc. • The intervertebral discs cushion the vertebrae and absorb shocks. • The spinal curvature and discs make the body trunk flexible and prevent shock to head while walking or running. • We have 2 spinal curvatures: 1) Primary curvature (present at birth): Concave forward - Thoracic - Sacral regions 2) Secondary curvature (present after birth): Convex forward - Cervical (after the baby holds his head 6th month) - Lumbar (after walking around one year) 3 Typical Vertebra ● Any vertebra is made up of: 1) Body or Centrum: - disc-like weight bearing part that lies anteriorly 2) Vertebral Arch: - Formed from fusion of 2 pedicles and 2 laminae ● Vertebral foramen lies between the body and the vertebral foramen. -
Biomechanics of Thoracic Discectomy
Neurosurg Focus 11 (3):Article 6, 2001, Click here to return to Table of Contents Biomechanics of thoracic discectomy ANDREW E. WAKEFIELD, M.D., MICHAEL P. STEINMETZ, M.D., AND EDWARD C. BENZEL, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut; and The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland, Ohio The thoracic spine is a structurally unique region that renders it uniquely suceptible to thoracic disc herniation. Surgical management strategies are complicated, in part, by the regional anatomical and biomechanical nuances. Surgical approaches include posterior, posterolateral, and anterior routes. Each isassociated with specific indications and contraindications. The biomechanical principles and safe anatomical trajectories must be considered in the surgical deci- sion-making process. These issues are discussed in the pages that follow. KEY WORDS • biomechanics • thoracic spine • instability • discectomy The thoracic spine has structurally distinct characteris- RELEVANT THORACIC ANATOMY tics that distinguish it from the cervical and lumbar spine. The posterior thoracic VB height is greater than the an- A highly specialized region, it is uniquely adapted to an terior height, which explains, in part, the existence of tho- erect posture and the load-bearing demands required from 5 racic kyphosis. The size of the thoracic VBs increases as the daily activities of upright creatures. The thoracic the thoracic spine descends. The facet joints change their spine has been divided into three regions: 1) the cervical- orientation from the coronal plane in the cervicothoracic to-thoracic transition zone (T1–4) 2), the thoracic-to-lum- region to a more sagittal plane in the thoracolumbar re- bar transition zone (T10–12), and 3) the midthoracic re- 3 16 gion, and this affects spinal motion. -
Acoustic Emission Signals from Injuries of Three Vertebra Specimens
IRC-14-25 IRCOBI Conference 2014 Acoustic Emission Signals from Injuries of Three‐Vertebra Specimens Carolyn Van Toen, John Street, Thomas R. Oxland, Peter A. Cripton Abstract Although acoustic emission (AE) signals from isolated spinal ligament failures have lower amplitudes and frequencies than those from vertebral body fractures, it is not known if AE signals could be used to differentiate between injured structures in spine segment testing. The objectives of this study were to evaluate differences in AE signal amplitudes and frequencies resulting from injuries of various tissue types, tested as part of a spine segment, during dynamic loading. Three‐vertebra specimens from the human cadaver cervical spine were tested in dynamic eccentric axial compression with lateral eccentricities. Specimens were tested with low (n=6) and high (n=5) initial eccentricities of 5 and 150% of the lateral diameter of the vertebral body, respectively. AE signals were recorded using two sensors. The time of injury initiation was identified for seven vertebral body and/or endplate fractures and five intertransverse and/or facet capsule ruptures. Hard tissue injuries resulted in higher peak amplitude AE signals than soft tissue injuries. Characteristic frequencies of AE signals from the sensor on the concave side of the lateral bend from failures of hard tissues were greater than those from failure of soft tissues. These findings suggest that AE signals can assist in delineating injured structures of the spine. Keywords acoustic emission, experimental, ligament, spine, vertebra I. INTRODUCTION Cervical spine injuries are associated with substantial personal, social and economic costs [1‐5]. In order to reduce the risk of these injuries occurring, injury prevention devices, such as airbags and helmets, are designed and evaluated using spine injury tolerances [6‐8].