2005 Inventory of Butterflies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure. -
Superior National Forest
Admirals & Relatives Subfamily Limenitidinae Skippers Family Hesperiidae £ Viceroy Limenitis archippus Spread-wing Skippers Subfamily Pyrginae £ Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus clarus £ Dreamy Duskywing Erynnis icelus £ Juvenal’s Duskywing Erynnis juvenalis £ Northern Cloudywing Thorybes pylades Butterflies of the £ White Admiral Limenitis arthemis arthemis Superior Satyrs Subfamily Satyrinae National Forest £ Common Wood-nymph Cercyonis pegala £ Common Ringlet Coenonympha tullia £ Northern Pearly-eye Enodia anthedon Skipperlings Subfamily Heteropterinae £ Arctic Skipper Carterocephalus palaemon £ Mancinus Alpine Erebia disa mancinus R9SS £ Red-disked Alpine Erebia discoidalis R9SS £ Little Wood-satyr Megisto cymela Grass-Skippers Subfamily Hesperiinae £ Pepper & Salt Skipper Amblyscirtes hegon £ Macoun’s Arctic Oeneis macounii £ Common Roadside-Skipper Amblyscirtes vialis £ Jutta Arctic Oeneis jutta (R9SS) £ Least Skipper Ancyloxypha numitor Northern Crescent £ Eyed Brown Satyrodes eurydice £ Dun Skipper Euphyes vestris Phyciodes selenis £ Common Branded Skipper Hesperia comma £ Indian Skipper Hesperia sassacus Monarchs Subfamily Danainae £ Hobomok Skipper Poanes hobomok £ Monarch Danaus plexippus £ Long Dash Polites mystic £ Peck’s Skipper Polites peckius £ Tawny-edged Skipper Polites themistocles £ European Skipper Thymelicus lineola LINKS: http://www.naba.org/ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/ in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national -
2017, Jones Road, Near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber)
Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton Toronto Entomologists’ Association Occasional Publication # 48-2018 European Skippers mudpuddling, July 6, 2017, Jones Road, near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber) Dusted Skipper, April 20, 2017, Ipperwash Beach, LAMB American Snout, August 6, 2017, (Photo: Bob Yukich) Dunes Beach, PRIN (Photo: David Kaposi) ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton April 2018 Published by the Toronto Entomologists’ Association Toronto, Ontario Production by Jessica Linton TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION Board of Directors: (TEA) Antonia Guidotti: R.O.M. Representative Programs Coordinator The TEA is a non-profit educational and scientific Carolyn King: O.N. Representative organization formed to promote interest in insects, to Publicity Coordinator encourage cooperation among amateur and professional Steve LaForest: Field Trips Coordinator entomologists, to educate and inform non-entomologists about insects, entomology and related fields, to aid in the ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA preservation of insects and their habitats and to issue Published annually by the Toronto Entomologists’ publications in support of these objectives. Association. The TEA is a registered charity (#1069095-21); all Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 donations are tax creditable. Publication date: April 2018 ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Membership Information: Copyright © TEA for Authors All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Annual dues: reproduced or used without written permission. Individual-$30 Student-free (Association finances permitting – Information on submitting records, notes and articles to beyond that, a charge of $20 will apply) Ontario Lepidoptera can be obtained by contacting: Family-$35 Jessica E. -
Butterflies from the Middle Eocene: the Earliest Occurrence of Fossil Papilionoidea (Lepidoptera)
THE PEARCE- SELLARDS Sctks NUMBER 29 BUTTERFLIES FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE: THE EARLIEST OCCURRENCE OF FOSSIL PAPILIONOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA) Christopher J. Durden and Hugh Rose 1978 Texas Memorial Museum/2400 Trinity/Austin, Texas 78705 W. W. Newcomb, Director The Pearce-Sellards Series is an occasional, miscellaneous series of brief reports of museum and museum associated field investigations and other research. Its title seeks to commemorate the first two directors of the Texas Memorial Museum, now both deceased: J. E. Pearce and Dr. E. H. Sellards, professors of anthropology and geology respectively, of The University of Texas. A complete list of Pearce-Sellards papers, as well as other publica- tions of the museum, will be sent upon request. BUTTERFLIES FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE: THE EARLIEST OCCURRENCE OF FOSSIL PAPILIONOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA) 1 Christopher J. Durden 2 and Hugh Rose 3 ABSTRACT Three fossil butterflies recently collected from the Green River Shale of Colorado extend the known range of Rhopalocera eight to ten million years back, to 48 Ma. Praepapilio Colorado n. g., n. sp., and P. gracilis n. sp. are primitive Papilionidae related to the modern Baronia brevicornis Salvin, but they require a new subfamily, Praepapilioninae. Riodinella nympha n. g., n. sp. is a primitive member of the Lycaenidae, related to modern Ancyluris, Riodina, and Rhetus, in the tribe Riodinidi. INTRODUCTION With approximately 194,000 living species, the Lepidoptera is, after the Coleoptera with some 350,000, species, the second most diverse order of organisms. It is underrepresented in the fossil record (Scudder 1875, 1891, 1892; Handlirsch 1925;Mackay 1970;Kuhne 1973; Shields 1976). -
Diversity, Ecology and Herbivory of Hairstreak Butterflies (Theclinae) Associated with the Velvet Tree, Miconia Calvescens in Costa Rica Author(S): F
Diversity, Ecology and Herbivory of Hairstreak Butterflies (Theclinae) Associated with the Velvet Tree, Miconia calvescens in Costa Rica Author(s): F. R. Badenes-Pérez, M. A. Alfaro-Alpízar and M. T. Johnson Source: Journal of Insect Science, 10(209):1-9. 2010. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.010.20901 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1673/031.010.20901 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 10 | Article 209 Badenes-Pérez et al. Diversity, ecology and herbivory of hairstreak butterflies (Theclinae) associated with the velvet tree, Miconia calvescens in Costa -
Yukon Butterflies a Guide to Yukon Butterflies
Wildlife Viewing Yukon butterflies A guide to Yukon butterflies Where to find them Currently, about 91 species of butterflies, representing five families, are known from Yukon, but scientists expect to discover more. Finding butterflies in Yukon is easy. Just look in any natural, open area on a warm, sunny day. Two excellent butterfly viewing spots are Keno Hill and the Blackstone Uplands. Pick up Yukon’s Wildlife Viewing Guide to find these and other wildlife viewing hotspots. Visitors follow an old mining road Viewing tips to explore the alpine on top of Keno Hill. This booklet will help you view and identify some of the more common butterflies, and a few distinctive but less common species. Additional species are mentioned but not illustrated. In some cases, © Government of Yukon 2019 you will need a detailed book, such as , ISBN 978-1-55362-862-2 The Butterflies of Canada to identify the exact species that you have seen. All photos by Crispin Guppy except as follows: In the Alpine (p.ii) Some Yukon butterflies, by Ryan Agar; Cerisy’s Sphynx moth (p.2) by Sara Nielsen; Anicia such as the large swallowtails, Checkerspot (p.2) by Bruce Bennett; swallowtails (p.3) by Bruce are bright to advertise their Bennett; Freija Fritillary (p.12) by Sonja Stange; Gallium Sphinx presence to mates. Others are caterpillar (p.19) by William Kleeden (www.yukonexplorer.com); coloured in dull earth tones Butterfly hike at Keno (p.21) by Peter Long; Alpine Interpretive that allow them to hide from bird Centre (p.22) by Bruce Bennett. -
(Lycaena Dorcas) from Nova Scotia
J. Acad. Entomol. Soc. 8: 41-42 (2012) NOTE The first record of Dorcas Copper Lycaena( dorcas) from Nova Scotia John Klymko, C. Sean Blaney, and Don G. Anderson Dorcas Copper (Lycaena dorcas W. Kirby) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) is a medium-sized copper (Lycaeninae) known from every Canadian province and territory except Nunavut, Prince Edward Island, and, prior to 2011, Nova Scotia (Layberry et al. 1998). In the Maritime Provinces, the species is rare, previously known only from Carleton and York Counties in western New Brunswick (Maritimes Butterfly Atlas 2011). Throughout its range, Dorcas Copper is typically associated with its larval host plant shrubby cinquefoil (Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda (Pursh) Kartesz) (Rosaceae)) (Layberry et al. 1998). However, it occurs in Wisconsin peatlands lacking shrubby cinquefoil (Nekola 1998), and has been recorded ovipositing on small cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos Turcz. ex Rupr. (Ericaceae)) and sweet gale (Myrica gale L. (Myricaceae)) (Handfield 2011). In the Maritimes, Dorcas Copper is known only from rich fens with shrubby cinquefoil, a habitat type that is rare in the region. On 21 July 2010, C.S. Blaney and D.M. Mazerolle discovered a Dorcas Copper colony while conducting a botanical inventory at the Black River Fen, a large complex of calcareous wetlands east of Lake Ainslie, Inverness County (46.1554°N, 61.2888°W) that includes several patches of calcareous fen. The site is an exceptional one for Nova Scotia, supporting many plant species that are characteristic of highly calcareous fens elsewhere in northeastern North America, but which are very rare in Nova Scotia. These species include Kalm’s lobelia (Lobelia kalmii L. -
Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae). -
7-1 1 May 2007
Volume 7 Number 1 1 May 2007 The Taxonomic Report OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY A Description of a New Subspecies of Lycaena phlaeas (Lycaenidae: Lycaeninae) from Montana, United States, With a Comparative Study of Old and New World Populations Steve Kohler 125 Hillcrest Loop, Missoula, Montana 59803 United States of America Abstract: The Palaearctic, Oriental and Ethiopian Region subspecies of Lycaena phlaeas are briefly discussed. A more detailed account of the North American subspecies is presented, and a new subspecies, L. p. weberi, from the Sweet Grass Hills, Montana is described. The possibility that the eastern United States subspecies hypophlaeas was introduced from the Old World is discussed; however no conclusion can be reached with certainty. The relationship between Old World and New World subspecies of L. phlaeas is discussed. Evidence presented supports the treatment of New World populations as subspecies of L. phlaeas. Additional key words: Polygonaceae, Rumex acetosella, R. acetosa, R. crispus, Oxyria digyna. INTRODUCTION Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus, 1761) is a widespread species with subspecies in Europe, North Africa, Arabia, northern Asia, Japan, North America and tropical Africa. The nominate subspecies occurs in northern Europe (Ackery et al., 1995). Shields & Montgomery (1966) mentioned that European texts list Polygonaceae (Rumex and Polygonum) as larval foodplants for L. phlaeas subspecies. Flight period is April to November, in one to four generations, depending on local conditions; over-wintering is in the larval stage (Tuzov, 2000). Bridges (1988) listed 19 subspecies in his catalogue, not including the North American ones. Miller and Brown (1981) listed five subspecies for North America. Ford (1924) attempted to cover the world-wide geographic races of L. -
Phylogenetic Relationships of the Riodinidae: Implications for the Evolution of Ant Association
CHAPTER 18 Phylogenetic Relationships of the Riodinidae: Implications for the Evolution of Ant Association Dana L. Campbell and Naomi E. Pierce PHYLOGENETIC HYPOTHESES OF THE PAPllIONOIDEA Although not for lack ofstudy, the evolutionary history of the rnajor lineages of "true" butterflies (Papilionoidea, including Hesperiidae) is still unknown, and multiple conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses exist in the literature. Assessing the systematic position of the metalmark butterflies (family Riodinidae) has been a particular challenge for this field. Furthermore, there is disagreement about the monophyly of this large group, which contains over 1,200 species. Most morphological studies place the riodinid butter flies as most closely related to the lycaenid butterflies, and identify the nymphalids as the closest relatives to this riodinid + lycaenid dade (Ehrlich and Ehrlich 1967; Kristensen 1976; Scott and Wright 1990; de jong et al. 1996a) (fig. 18.1A, B). These relationships have been inferred with a variety of phylogenetic methods and are supported by a number of adult, larval, and pupal synapomorphies, although few are universal or uniquely derived. An alternative hypothesis of the placement of the riodinids was proposed by Robbins (1988a). Based on a cladistic analysis of nine character states among four characters of the foreleg coxa, trochanter, and basal femur, Robb!ns suggested that the Riodinidae are more closely related to the Nymphalidae than to the Lycaenidae (fig. 18.1C), and split the lycaenids into two groups, which may not compose a monophyletic lineage: Lycaeninae-Theclinae Polyommatinae and Lipteninae-Poritjnae-Miletinae-Curetinae. Two molecular studies have explored papiJionid relationships, but their results conflict with each other and with the morphological hypothe ses (fig. -
Conservation Overview of Butterflies in the Southern Headwaters at Risk Project (SHARP) Area
Conservation Overview of Butterflies in the Southern Headwaters at Risk Project (SHARP) Area Al Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 80 Conservation Overview of Butterflies in the Southern Headwaters at Risk Project (SHARP) Area Norbert G. Kondla Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 80 January 2004 Publication No. I/136 ISBN: 0-7785-2954-1 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-2955-X (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1496-7219 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1496-7146 (On-line Edition) Cover photograph: Norbert Kondla, Plebejus melissa (Melissa Blue), Maycroft, AB For copies of this report, contact: Information Centre- Publications Alberta Environment/ Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920- 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 OR Information Service Alberta Environment/ Alberta Sustainable Resource Development #100, 3115- 12 Street NE Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2E 7J2 Telephone: (403) 297- 3362 OR Visit our web site at: http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/riskspecies/ This publication may be cited as: Kondla, N.G. 2004. Conservation overview of butterflies in the southern headwaters at risk project (SHARP) area. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 80. Edmonton, AB. 35 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... -
The African Copper Connection
The African copper connection Rienk de Jong & Karen van Dorp Apart from their colourful appearance, Copper butterflies are intriguing because of their highly National Museum of Natural History Naturalis disjunct distribution. Almost all species occur in PO Box 9517 the Holarctic region, but a few are found isolated 2300 RA Leiden in the Southern Hemisphere. To learn more about The Netherlands the interrelationship of the southern taxa and [email protected] their distribution history, an analysis of the phy- logeny of the group was carried out. Although morphological characters are sufficient to diagno- se the species, they proved insufficient to build a phylogeny on. Theref o r e, we had recourse to mo- lecules, using two genes. Here we report on the represented in Africa south of the Sahara by L. phlaeas (s o u t h results with reg a r d to the African rep re s e n t a t i v e s . to Malawi) and two species in South Africa, L. orus Stoll, 1780, and L. clarki Dickson, 1971, and surprisingly in New Zealand Entomologische Berichten 66(4): 124-129 by four species. The other tribe of the subfamily, Heliophorini (Bozano & Weidenhoffer 2001), also has a remarkable distribu- tion, with one genus in the Oriental region, one in Papua New Key words: copper butterflies, Africa, DNA, phylogeny, dis- Guinea and one in Guatemala. To understand these distribu- tribution tions we need to know the phylogeny of the group. In this paper we focus on the question whether the South African taxa Search for the phylogeny of copper butterflies are closely related to the other taxon in Subsaharan Africa, L.