DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Analysis of Assessed Hromadas In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Analysis of Assessed Hromadas In COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ASSESSED HROMADAS IN LUHANSK OBLAST UKRAINE, MARCH 2021 MAP 1. Interactive map: Overview of assessed hromadas in Donetsk Oblast (click on hromadas to skip to TABLE OF CONTENTS the hromada profile in this document) Cross-hromada vulnerability comparison ........................................ 3 Bilovodsk hromada overview ............................................................ 4 Kreminna hromada overview ............................................................. 5 Lysychansk hromada overview ......................................................... 6 Milove hromada overview .................................................................. 7 Novoaidar hromada overview ............................................................ 8 Nyzhnoteple hromada overview ........................................................ 9 Bilovodsk Popasna hromada overview .............................................................. 10 Bilovodsk Rubizhne hromada overview ............................................................. 11 Bilovodsk Shchastia hromada overview ............................................................ 12 Bilovodsk Shyrokiy hromada overview .............................................................. 13 Bilovodsk Bilovodsk Sievierodonetsk hromada overview .................................................. 14 Bilovodsk Stanytsia Luhanska hromada overview ............................................ 15 Bilovodsk Bilovodsk Overall overview of assessed hromadas .......................................... 17 Methodological annex and disclaimer .............................................. 18 Bilovodsk Bilovodsk AGORA is a joint initiative of ACTED and IMPACT Initiatives, founded in 2016. AGORA promotes Bilovodsk efficient, inclusive and integrated local planning, aid response, and service delivery in contexts of crisis through applying settlement-based processes and tools. AGORA enables more efficient and tailored aid responses to support the recovery and stabilization of crisis-affected communities, contributing to meet their humanitarian needs, whilst promoting the re-establishment of local services and supporting local governance actors. AGORA promotes multisectoral, settlement-based aid planning and implementation, structured around partnerships between local, national and international stakeholders. AGORA’s core activities include community mapping, multisector and area-based assessments, needs prioritisation and planning, as well as support to area-based coordination mechanisms and institutional cooperation. 2 CROSS-HROMADA VULNERABILITY COMPARISON TABLE 1: Composition of categories Population age This cross-hromada comparison chart illustrates Displacement the ranking of hromadas along 8 key categories, DEMOGRAPHY Disabilities built with indicators collected via the household Vulnerabilities* survey as shown in Table 1 and broken down in Table Healthcare expenditure 2 on page 9. The “overall vulnerability index” below Unemployment shows the average score of each hromada across all ECONOMIC Indebtedness categories (all weighted equally); and determines the VULNERABILITY Level of income colour of the hromada tile. For instance, Nyzhnoteple Education was found to be the most vulnerable hromada across Waste management all category while Kreminna was the least vulnerable. Sewage management ENVIRONMENT Within each column or category, hromadas are sorted Environmental concerns according to their position within the target categories. Community cleanup** For instance, Lysychansk is ranked first in terms of Trust in police economic vulnerability, fourth in terms of environment, Civic engagement GOVERNANCE fifth in terms of utilities; while it is ranked in second last Decentralization position in terms of safety, mobility and governance. Trust in local government Overall vulnerability index Economic mobility Frequency of movement MOBILITY Public transportation Access to health facilities Safety to school SAFETY General safety Conflict-related threats Education services Healthcare services SERVICES Administrative services Social services Financial services * % of the population reportedly having at least one of the following Roads vulnerabilities: pensioner, disability (with or without status), chronicall Electricity provision illness UTILITIES ** According to HH satisfaction with the level of cleanup in their Water provision community Heating provision 3 Findings are based on data collected between June and September 2020, via 385 household surveys in the hromada center, 394 in BILOVODSK HROMADA the hromada periphery representing 2,000 household members, 89 interviews with facility key informants (FKIs) and 95 community representative KIs. Household level findings are representative at the hromada level with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of OVERVIEW error, while (F)KI findings are indicative. of households reported being 23 dissatisfied with the public Most commonly reported concerns % transportation in their settlement by households: 18 19 (17% in center, and 20% in 1. Armed conflict 1. Armed conflict Population age periphery) Healthcare expenditure Displacement 2. Employment 2. Employment Chronic illness of households were reportedly Disabilities Ranking of 23 hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas hromadas 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of g ing nking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ra Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Rank Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Rankin Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking of 23 hromadas 23 of Ranking 5 % 3. Affordability of goods 3. Access to healthcare hromadas 23 of Ranking 43 dissatisfied with the provision of Frequency of movement healthcare (43% in center, and 47% Most commonly suggested intervention Public transportation Trust in local government 9 11 in periphery) 4 2 priorities by households: 7 17 Mobility Education services 15 21 Healthcare services 1. Streets and roads 5 Administrative services 1. Reduce unemploy- Civic engagement Demography ment repairs 3 Social services 6 Services 4 Availability of staff 2 ENVIRONMENT 2. Streets and roads 1 2. Reduce unemployment Governance 13 Pressure from NGCA* repairs of households who don’t have access to 3. Improving all services 3. Improving all services 5 % Internet 19 Waste management waste management services, (28% in 11 Environment 75 Types of utilities households most Utilities 18 Sewage management center, and 94% in periphery) Financial services 18 13 Environmental concerns commonly reported being dissatisfied with: 20 1 6 Cleanup of community of households reported being dissatisfied 1. Roads Heating provision 1. Roads 21 Economic Safety % with the level of cleanup in their Water provision 2 security 13 17 2. Gas 2. Heating 2 Safety level, day community (10% in center and 20% in Roads 12 13 Safety level, night 17 5 10 Conflict−related threats periphery) Electricity provision 19 Trust in police Center Periphery Overall EducationIncome PERCEIVED SAFETY ECONOMIC SECURITY Indebtness Pensioners Unemployment of households reported trusting Most commonly reported % % police in their settlement (while 21 of the population* employment sectors in 34 (16+) were unemployed 32% did not, and 34% were Ē which members were indifferent) employed: 35 % Agriculture 35% % of respondents reporting feeling unsafe and + 28 24 of the population* The graph above summarizes selected hromada-level indicators as reported through household most commonly reported reason why: Services 28% (16+) were employed + 9 and facility surveys and grouped into 8 domains. Indicators are shown as a ranked comparison Education 9% against the 23 sampled hromadas included in this assessment: the longer the bar, the lower the Day 2% Drunk people % hromada is ranked. A red colour indicates that the hromada is ranked among the 5 lowest-scoring 73 of the working-age population* (16+) had an hromadas on a particular indicator, and a green colour indicates that the hromada is ranked average monthly income of less than 4,000 UAH among the 5 highest-scoring hromadas. Numbers inside the circle display the actual ranking of the Night 40% Lack of lighting hromada for each indicator. * % of working-age HH members * Non-government controlled areas Findings are based on data collected between June and September 2020, via 392 household surveys in the hromada center, 363 in KREMINNA HROMADA the hromada periphery representing 1,790 household members, 65 interviews with facility key informants (FKIs) and 33 community representative KIs. Household level findings are representative at the hromada level with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin OVERVIEW of error, while
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transformations of the Cultural Landscape of Donbas During the Armed Conflict 2015–2017
    Studia z Geografii Politycznej i Historycznej tom 6 (2017), s. 305–326 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2300-0562.06.13 Roman Slyvka, Liubov Slyvka, Yaroslava Atamaniuk Transformations of the cultural landscape of Donbas during the armed conflict 2015–2017 The main objective of the article – to show the different trajectories of the cultural land- scape in controlled and uncontrolled parts of the war-torn Donbas. The cultural landscape of Ukraine significantly changed during the twentieth century. The main factors of these transformations were ideological, military and geopolitical. The sub-ordinate position of Ukraine within the USSR allowed communist leaders to enforce sovietisation of the cultural landscape. This policy was especially noticeable in the great industrial region of Donbas. Achievements of independence by Ukraine and democratization of country' public life have led to transformation/conservation of the cultural landscape, which corresponded with political culture of individual regions. The war in the Donbas has become a catalyst for the processes of creating different types of cultural landscape on the different sides of the contact line. The policy of creating a cultural landscape has become an instrument of political socialization and mobilization of the population. This process is not complete, and can contribute to the crystallization of new subregional identities on different parts of contemporary Donbas. Keywords: Donbas, cultural landscape, post-soviet city, military conflict, decomunisa- tion, renaming, monument, policy of memory. 1. Introduction The conflict in Donbas deepened those political divisions that began to be observed in Ukrainian society since the 1990s. There are a number of visible elements of Donbas' cultural landscape, which indicates the drastic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211 Summary The SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 42 ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission recorded 40 ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded five ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and a transfer of funds. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry- exit checkpoints and two corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Bezimenne and on a road near non- government-controlled Korsun, Donetsk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational, and weather conditions limited the observational capabilities of some of the other SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations, including nine explosions (five undetermined and four outgoing, all of undetermined weapons), which occurred in areas on the north-western edge of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk) and near the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015 CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 II. RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, SECURITY AND PHYSICAL INTEGRITY 7 A. Casualties 7 B. Civilian casualties 8 C. Total casualties (civilian and military) from mid-April 2014 to 15 August 2015 12 D. Unlawful and arbitrary detention, summary executions, and torture and ill-treatment 13 III. FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 18 A. Freedom of movement 18 B. Freedom of expression 19 C. Freedom of peaceful assembly 20 D. Freedom of association 21 E. Freedom of religion or belief 22 IV. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS 22 A. Right to an adequate standard of living 23 B. Right to social security and protection 24 C. Right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health 26 V. ACCOUNTABILITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 27 A. Accountability for human rights violations committed in the east of Ukraine 27 B. Accountability for human rights violations committed during the Maidan protests 30 C. Accountability for the 2 May violence in Odesa 30 D. Administration of justice 32 VI. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS 34 VII. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA 38 VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This is the eleventh report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on the situation of human rights in Ukraine, based on the work of the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) 1. It covers the period from 16 May to 15 August 2015 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Situations in Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene in Damaged by the Conflict Areas in Eastern Ukraine
    SURVEY SITUATIONS IN WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND HYGIENE IN DAMAGED BY THE CONFLICT AREAS IN EASTERN UKRAINE Customer: UN Children's Fund(UNICEF) Perfomer: Luhansk Regional charitable organization "Luhansk communities fund"KHORS " Terms of the survey: 15.12.2014-05.01.2015 Date of report: 15.01.2015 Фонд громадВибір Table of contents Name of the Project: ............................................................................................................................ 3 Survey objectives ................................................................................................................................. 3 Place for Survey Implementation ........................................................................................................ 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Limitations in making the survey ........................................................................................................ 4 Short description of survey results ...................................................................................................... 4 Territories ....................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Affected population ........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Temporarily displaced people ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    SEC.FR/876/20 29 December 2020 OSCE+ ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT CHECKPOINTS ALONG THE CONTACT LINE: CHALLENGES CIVILIANS FACE WHEN CROSSING 1 November 2019 - 15 November 2020 December 2020 1 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: Legislative and regulatory developments 9 Measures taken at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECP) and at the corresponding checkpoints of the 9 armed formations amid the COVID-19 outbreak (16 March to 10 June 2020) Regulatory developments following the partial reopening of the EECPs and of the corresponding check- 10 points (10 June to 15 November 2020) Other developments 12 Chapter 2: Impact on civilians of the freedom of movement restrictions and of the crossing requirements 14 after the partial reopening of the EECPs and the corresponding checkpoints Impact of freedom of movement restrictions on access to rights and services 14 Partial reopening of the EECPs and corresponding checkpoints, and burden of crossing requirements 18 on civilians Chapter 3: Opening of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge and construction works near Zolote and Shchas- 22 tia Opening of the renovated section of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge 22 Construction and works near Shchastia and Zolote 22 Conclusion 26 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crucial aspects of the lives of civilians in the conflict-affected areas of eastern Ukraine depend on their ability to cross the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Humanitarian Snapshot
    UKRAINE CROSSING POINTS - Snapshot: July 2021 Despite the 15.5 per cent increase in civilian movement across the “contact line” in July compared to June (97,000 vs. 82,000), the number of civilian crossings remains low, representing just 7.5 per cent of 1.3 million crossings recorded in July 2019. Since the movement across the “contact line” remains limited to certain categories of people, 212,471 individuals, manyof whom are likely residents of non-Government-controlled areas (NGCA), opted to transit through the Russian Federation via the crossing points (CPs) “Milove” (Luhanska oblast) and “Hoptivka” (Kharkivska oblast) to enter Government-controlled areas (GCA) in July. However, the limited capacity of these border crossing points and long processing times are reported to have resulted in people spending up to 24 hours to cross to GCA. OPERATIONAL UPDATES ENTRY/EXIT CROSSING POINTS (EECPs) MAP EECP KEY FIGURES (July 2021) On 22 July, the President signed a law cancelling administrative fines for crossing the uncontrolled section of the Ukrainian-Russian border to transit to GCA from NGCA.¹ Following the entry into force of this law, NGCA Legend Number of ‘contact line’ 'Contact line' as of August 2018 residents will no longer be required to pay these fines at “Milove” and “Hoptivka” crossing points while COVID-19 ≈ k crossings by people Planned EECP 97 restrictions are in place provided that their justification for crossing falls under certain humanitarian exemptions.² Non-operational EECP While the law provides the possibility for the State Border Guard Service to exempt a person from paying a fine on Number of ‘contact line’ other grounds, reportedly, it hasn't been applied consistently to date.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC: Profiling of IDP Situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine
    ProfilingAnnual of IDP situation Report in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-drivenfrom approach the toBoard durable solutions 2019 Acknowledgements NRC would like to thank NRC staff and Mr. Petr Kostohryz, JIPS staff, members of the Techni- cal Working Group and the Advisory Group, Luhansk State Regional Administration, in partic- ular the Social Protection Department, Prof. Volodymyr Sarioglo, Analytical Center Sociocon- sulting, NGO Stabilisation Support Services, Luhansk Regional IDP Council. List of Abbreviations CSO Civil Society Organisation GCA Government-Controlled Area (includes any government-controlled area in Ukraine not limited to Luhansk or Donetsk regions) GDP Gross Domestic Product IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person JIPS Joint IDP Profiling Service NGCA Non-Government Controlled Area NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NRC Norwegian Refugee Council SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise SSS NGO Stabilisation Support Services UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia UN United Nations Profiling of IDP situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-driven approach to durable solutions 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................4 2. Introduction .......................................................................5 3. Methodology ......................................................................7 4. Limitations ........................................................................7 5. International Standards and National Frameworks on Durable Solutions
    [Show full text]
  • GBV Sub-Cluster Joint Action Plan 2019
    GBV Sub-Cluster Joint Action Plan 2019 Priorities Activities Priority 1. Coordination to strengthen protection of GBV survivors and foster multisectoral response 1.1.1 Joint multisectoral initiatives are implemented based on the unififed framework, coordination mechanisms are functional and coordinated (adjusted) 1.1.2 Mapping/updates of GBV services (health care, PSS, legal) available regularly 1.1. Coordination of GBV multisectoral response 1.1.3 Technical/expert support to work out and implement policies on GBV MSR with regard to international standards 1.1.4 Accountability to affected population is in place 1.2.1 Roundtables/workshops/trainings/other learning solutions for representatives of respective bodies including civil society/community/media continued to be organized 1.2 Strengthening capacities of GBV MSR respective 1.2.2 Advocacy initiatives/bilateral and multilateral meetings conducted regularly on GBV prevention bodies and c coordinators and response 1.2.3 Sensitizing the community to GBV issues, enabling zero tolerance to GBV 1.3.1 Information materials on GBV/referrals/available services continued to be developed, updated, published and distributed to vulnerable population and respective bodies 1.3 Awareness raising and information campaigns 1.3.2 Roundtable discussions for civil society/community/media representatives continued to be organized 1.3.3 16 Days of Activism against Gender-based Violence Priority 2. Life-saving services for GBV survivors are available with regard to Humanitarian-Development Nexus 2.1.1 Psychosocial
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • (CONSULTING SERVICES – FIRMS SELECTION) UKRAINE ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Loan No.: 8549-UA
    REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (CONSULTING SERVICES – FIRMS SELECTION) UKRAINE ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Loan No.: 8549-UA Assignment Title: Consultancy Services for design and bidding documents elaboration for repair (rehabilitation) of the road R-66 KPP “Demyno-Oleksandrivka”-Svatove-Lysychansk-Luhansk sections km 30+000 – km 86+600, km 93+400 – km 145+075 and the road N-26 Chuguyiv-Milove section: km 136+000 – km 148+000 and T-13-02 KPP “Tanyushivka”-Starobilsk-Bahmut section km 76+000 – km 121+400. Reference No.: CS-23 BACKGROUND The State Road Agency of Ukraine (Ukravtodor) has received financing from the World Bank (“Bank”) toward the cost of the Road Sector Development Project and intends to apply part of the proceeds for consulting services. PURPOSE OF ASSIGNMENT The key objective is to undertake engineering surveys, design, preparation of bidding documents and cost estimate for repair (rehabilitation) of the road R-66 KPP “Demyno-Oleksandrivka”-Svatove- Lysychansk-Luhansk sections km 30+000 – km 86+600 (56.6 km in length), km 93+400 – km 145+075 (51.7 km in length) and the road N-26 Chuguyiv-Milove section: km 136+000 – km 148+000 (12 km in length) and T-13-02 KPP “Tanyushivka”-Starobilsk-Bahmut section km 76+000 – km 121+400 (45.4 km in length). The main tasks are divided into phases with the continuation of the Consultant’s appointment to carry out a subsequent phase is dependent on the Consultant’s satisfactory performance in carrying out the services under the previous phase/s. • Phase I: development of the design
    [Show full text]
  • Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015
    General Coordination Meeting – Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015 Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Summary of steps taken based on decisions of the previous meeting by UN OCHA OCHA to follow up on the implications of new Temporary Order of entry/exit to NGCAs for humanitarian cargo UN OCHA summarized activities based on the decisions of the last General Coordination Meeting. The movement. issue of unaccompanied minors is being addressed both at oblast and national levels. WHO keeps checking if tuberculin was delivered to all raions of the oblast. For the moment, it is confirmed that Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions and Lysychansk didn’t receive it. WHO and UN OCHA had the meetings with the authorities in Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions. The maternity hospital in Bilovodsk serves three raions and many women come for delivery from NGCAs of the oblast. The authorities asked to support the hospital with hygiene kits both for women and for newborns. At the national level UN OCHA continues to provide support in the development of the Law on “humanitarian assistance”. It is expected that the draft is finalized by June 30 and then passed for discussion to the Parliament of Ukraine. As of today only 30% of required funding has been funded or pledged as part of Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The new Temporary Order on entry/exit to NGCAs has been adopted and came into force. For the moment no commercial cargoes are permitted to NGCAs due to security situation. 2. Update of the current humanitarian situation in Oblast from UN OCHA and LOMCA SES to share the estimated costs of transition center with the humanitarian partners for their participation in The number of officially registered IDPs is growing despite of difficulties in crossing the contact line.
    [Show full text]