DOCSLIB.ORG

Between Friends Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Between Friends Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli JOHN M. NAJEMY Between Friends Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli-Vettori Letters of 1513-1515 PRINCETON LEGACY LIBRARY c."Between friends DISCOURSES OF POWER AND DESIRE IN THE MACHIAVELLI-VETTORI LETTERS OF 1513-1515 John M. Najemy PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS • PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY Copyright © 1993 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, Chichester, Wesr Sussex All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Najemy, John M., 1943- Between friends : discourses of power and desire in the Machiavelli-Vettori letters of 1513-1515 / John M. Najemy. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-691-03262-9 z. Machiavelli, Niccolo, 1469-1527-Correspondence. 2. Vettori, Francesco, 1474-1539-Correspondence. 3. Italy-Intellectual life-1268-1559. DG738.14.M2A4 1993 320.1'092-dc20 93-9737 CIP This book has been composed in Garamond typeface Princeton University Press books are printed on acid-free paper and meet the guidelines fur permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources Printed in the United States of America IO 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Princeton Legacy Library edition 2019 Paperback ISBN: 978-0-691-65522-2 Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-691-65664-9 To the memory of Hans Baron (1900-1988) and Edward P. Morris (1924-1989) ?f CONTENTS ?f Prefac e ix Abbreviations xiii INTRODUCTION : The Letters in Machiavelli Studies 3 CHAPTE R ONE : Renaissance Epistolarity 18 The Social Worlds of Florentin e Lette r Writing 19 Petrarc h and the Ancient s 25 Humanist s and Their Lette r Collection s 30 Letter s and Literatur e 33 Manual s and Theor y 42 CHAPTE R TWO: Contexts Personal and Political 58 The Secretary and His Letter s 58 Francesc o Vettori 71 Friendshi p and Politic s in the Republic' s Crisis 82 CHAPTE R THREE : "Formerly Secretary" 95 "Discorsi et concetti " in Exile 95 "A spirited maker of beginnings" 117 CHAPTE R FOUR : Speaking like Romans 136 "Some of it we just imagine" 136 "Natural e affection e ο passione" 152 The Swiss and "the sweetness of domination " 156 The Inventio n of Redemptiv e Virtu 167 CHAPTE R FIVE: The Princ e "Addressed" to Francesco Vettori 176 What Text Did Vettori See? 177 "Verita effettuale" and "Imaginazione " 185 Securit y and Power 197 Intelligibility , Power, Love 201 CHAPTE R SIX: Geta and the "Antiqui Huomini" (The Lette r of 10 Decembe r 1513) 215 "Sed fatis trahimur " 215 Maestr o Get a and His New "Scienza" 221 "Tucto mi transferisco in loro" 2 30 Vlll CONTENTS CHAPTER SEVEN: "A Ridiculous Metamorphosis" 241 "What kinds of writers could not be criticized?" 241 "As worthy of being recited to a prince as anything I have heard this year" 253 Desire in the Text 271 CHAPTER EIGHT: "After a Thousand Years" 277 "These princes are men like you and me" 277 "To me alone Troy remains" 287 "To enlist you again in the old game" 295 CHAPTER NINE: Poetry and Politics 313 Corydon in San Casciano 313 Metamorphosis in the Text 319 EPILOGUE: The Poets of the Discourses 335 Index 351 * PREFACE # HE ESSAY offered in these pages combines a reading of Machiavelli's correspondence with Francesco Vettori in 1513-15 with an at- tempt to set this famous epistolary dialogue in the context of Ma- chiavelli's emergence and transformation as a writer and political Ttheorist. Some potential readers may wonder about the decision to devote this much attention to several dozen reasonably well known and much- published letters, especially as I have no discoveries to report from the ar- chives or manuscripts. Machiavelli specialists have labored with skill and patience to improve the accuracy of the texts, to clarify the dating of the letters, and to identify the references or allusions to persons, events, and texts. And some of the letters, most notably that of 10 December 1513, have received a considerable amount of critical analysis and interpretation. \et, despite all this work and the illuminating treatments of specific pas- sages, individual letters, and particular themes, the correspondence as a whole has by and large eluded interpretation. The chief purposes of this essay will be, first, to show why and in what sense the Machiavelli-Vettori letters of 1513-15 can be thought of—indeed, how Machiavelli and Vettori themselves gradually came to think of them—as a whole that invites in- terpretation, and, second, to suggest how a reading of the letters can con- tribute to the larger project of interpreting Machiavelli's major works. Various reasons can be adduced to account for the lack of comprehensive treatments of this correspondence. First and perhaps most obvious is that these letters do not constitute a single text in the ordinary sense of the term. Machiavelli and Vettori had almost certainly exchanged letters on occasion before 1513 (as a 1510 letter from Vettori suggests), and in the 1520s they again wrote to each other fairly regularly. In a correspondence whose limits extend to almost two decades, there is at first glance nothing self-evident about why a particular two-year phase can or should be treated as a discrete unit. Another reason has to do not merely with the fact of two authors, but with the (understandably) very different assumptions and expectations with which almost all readers approach them. Everyone knows Machiavelli (in one fashion or another), while only specialists in Italian Renaissance history and literature have even heard of Francesco Vettori, and even many of these know him only as Machiavelli's friend and correspondent. To many this has seemed a joint authorship of such obvious inequality that there has been little incentive to take Vettori and his letters seriously, or even to consider the possibility that Machiavelli did so. A further purpose of these pages will be to show how insufficient attention to Vettori's letters severely restricts χ PREFACE the understandin g not only of Machiavelli' s letters but of certain crucia l aspects of The Prince as well. Still anothe r reason for the persistenc e of limited and fragmente d readings of the letters lies in one of their most frequentl y acknowledge d but least- studied features: the curiou s unpredictabilit y with which they alternat e be- tween "serious" discussions of politica l and diplomati c issues and "frivolous" bante r on love and the foibles of eros. Machiavell i and Vettori did not explain or justify these disruption s and change s of direction , and the resultin g range of moods , themes , and language has left man y reader s with the uncom - fortable feeling that the two discorsi have little or nothin g to do with each other . Despit e a few noteworth y attempt s to uncove r possible connection s between the letters on politics and those on love, the general tendenc y has been to prefer one them e to the other . Predictabl y enough , historian s have devoted most of their attentio n to the politica l letters, while literary critics have explored the connection s between the letters on love and Machiavelli' s plays. Each set of letters has been used to illuminat e different major works, and this too has inhibite d the inclinatio n to ask why Machiavell i and Vettori interrupte d their discussions of politics to engage in an apparentl y whim- sical exchange on love, then returne d to politics and yet again to love. The dynami c of this alternatio n and the ways in which Machiavell i and Vettori contribute d to it will be a principa l focus of my analysis of the letters. It may also be the case that , with one or two notabl e exceptions , even Machiavelli' s letters have suffered, by assumed or implicit compariso n with the "major" works, from a certain tendenc y to relegate letters to a secondar y (and sometime s lower) status in the hierarch y of literary genres.' As the first chapte r will attemp t to show, one form of this attitud e of condescensio n toward letters, particularl y influentia l in the Renaissanc e itself, derives from a classical topo s accordin g to which letters are and should be nothin g more 1 Recently , however, the history of letter writing and the study of epistolarit y have emerged as fields of significant critical inquiry. For an introductio n to epistolarit y in the cultur e of the Middl e Ages and the Renaissance , see Giles Constable , Letters and Letter Col- lections, fasc. 17 of Typologie des sources du moyen age occidental (Turnhout : Brepols, 1976). On epistolarit y in early moder n and moder n literature , see Janet Gurki n Altman, Epistolarity, Approaches to a Form (Columbus , Ohio: Ohio Universit y Press, 1982); also the volume L'epistolarite a travers les siecles: Geste de communication etlou d'ecriture, papers of the 1987 con- ference at the Centr e Culture l Internationa l de Cerisy La Salle organized by Mireille Bossis and Charle s A. Porte r (Stuttgart : Fran z Steiner Verlag, 1990); and, for epistolarit y in Italian culture , La correspondence [edition, functions, significations], vol. 1, Actes du colloque franco- italien, Aix-en-Provence , Octobe r 1983 (Aix-en-Provence : Centr e Aixois de Recherche s Italiennes , 1984), and vol. 2, Actes du colloque international , Aix-en-Provence , Octobe r 1984 (Aix-en-Provence : Centr e Aixois de Recherche s Italiennes , 1985).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quaderni D'italianistica : Revue Officielle De La Société Canadienne
    Elio Costa From locus amoris to Infernal Pentecost: the Sin of Brunetto Latini The fame of Brunetto Latini was until recently tied to his role in Inferno 15 rather than to the intrinsic literary or philosophical merit of his own works.' Leaving aside, for the moment, the complex question of Latini's influence on the author of the Commedia, the encounter, and particularly the words "che 'n la mente m' è fìtta, e or m'accora, / la cara e buona imagine paterna / di voi quando nel mondo ad ora ad ora / m'insegnavate come l'uom s'ettema" (82-85) do seem to acknowledge a profound debt by the pilgrim towards the old notary. Only one other figure in the Inferno is addressed with a similar expression of gratitude, and that is, of course, Virgil: Tu se' lo mio maestro e'I mio autore; tu se' solo colui da cu' io tolsi lo bello stilo che m'ha fatto onore. {Inf. 1.85-87) If Virgil is antonomastically the teacher, what facet of Dante's cre- ative personality was affected by Latini? The encounter between the notary and the pilgrim in Inferno 15 is made all the more intriguing by the use of the same phrase "lo mio maestro" (97) to refer to Virgil, silent throughout the episode except for his single utterance "Bene ascolta chi la nota" (99). That it is the poet and not the pilgrim who thus refers to Virgil at this point, when the two magisterial figures, one leading forward to Beatrice and the other backward to the city of strife, conflict and exile, provides a clear hint of tension between "present" and "past" teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fra Sabba Da Castiglione: the Self-Fashioning of a Renaissance Knight Hospitaller”
    “Fra Sabba da Castiglione: The Self-Fashioning of a Renaissance Knight Hospitaller” by Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi B.A., University of Pennsylvania 1988 M.A., University of North Carolina 1996 Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Italian Studies at Brown University May 2011 © Copyright 2011 by Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi This dissertation by Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi is accepted in its present form by the Department of Italian Studies as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Ronald L. Martinez, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date Evelyn Lincoln, Reader Date Ennio Rao, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date Peter M. Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Ranieri Moore Cavaceppi was born in Rome, Italy on October 11, 1965, and moved to Washington, DC at the age of ten. A Fulbright Fellow and a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, Ranieri received an M.A. in Italian literature from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1996, whereupon he began his doctoral studies at Brown University with an emphasis on medieval and Renaissance Italian literature. Returning home to Washington in the fall of 2000, Ranieri became the father of three children, commenced his dissertation research on Knights Hospitaller, and was appointed the primary full-time instructor at American University, acting as language coordinator for the Italian program. iv PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I deeply appreciate the generous help that I received from each member of my dissertation committee: my advisor Ronald Martinez took a keen interest in this project since its inception in 2004 and suggested many of its leading insights; my readers Evelyn Lincoln and Ennio Rao contributed numerous observations and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Ricklin, « Filosofia Non È Altro Che Amistanza a Sapienza » Nadja
    Thomas Ricklin, « Filosofia non è altro che amistanza a sapienza » Abstract: This is the opening speech of the SIEPM world Congress held in Freising in August 2012. It illustrates the general theme of the Congress – The Pleasure of Knowledge – by referring mainly to the Roman (Cicero, Seneca) and the medieval Latin and vernacular tradition (William of Conches, Robert Grosseteste, Albert the Great, Brunetto Latini), with a special emphasis on Dante’s Convivio. Nadja Germann, Logic as the Path to Happiness: Al-Fa-ra-bı- and the Divisions of the Sciences Abstract: Divisions of the sciences have been popular objects of study ever since antiquity. One reason for this esteem might be their potential to reveal in a succinct manner how scholars, schools or entire societies thought about the body of knowledge available at their time and its specific structure. However, what do classifications tell us about thepleasures of knowledge? Occasionally, quite a lot, par- ticularly in a setting where the acquisition of knowledge is considered to be the only path leading to the pleasures of ultimate happiness. This is the case for al-Fa-ra-b-ı (d. 950), who is at the center of this paper. He is particularly interesting for a study such as this because he actually does believe that humanity’s final goal consists in the attainment of happiness through the acquisition of knowledge; and he wrote several treatises, not only on the classification of the sciences as such, but also on the underlying epistemological reasons for this division. Thus he offers excellent insight into a 10th-century theory of what knowledge essentially is and how it may be acquired, a theory which underlies any further discussion on the topic throughout the classical period of Islamic thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Selective Chronology of Historical Events
    APPENDIX A: SELECTIVE CHRONOLOGY OF HIsTORICaL EVENTs 1190 Piero della Vigna born in Capua. 1212 Manente (“Farinata”) degli Uberti born in Florence. 1215 The Buondelmonte (Guelf) and Amidei (Ghibelline) feud begins in Florence. It lasts thirty-three years and stirs parti- san political conflict in Florence for decades thereafter. 1220 Brunetto Latini born in Florence. Piero della Vigna named notary and scribe in the court of Frederick II. 1222 Pisa and Florence wage their first war. 1223 Guido da Montefeltro born in San Leo. 1225 Piero appointed Judex Magnae Curia, judge of the great court of Frederick. 1227 Emperor Frederick II appoints Ezzelino da Romano as commander of forces against the Guelfs in the March of Verona. 1228 Pisa defeats the forces of Florence and Lucca at Barga. 1231 Piero completes the Liber Augustalis, a new legal code for the Kingdom of Sicily. 1233 The cities of the Veronese March, a frontier district of The Holy Roman Empire, transact the peace of Paquara, which lasts only a few days. © The Author(s) 2020 249 R. A. Belliotti, Dante’s Inferno, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40771-1 250 AppeNDiX A: Selective ChrONOlOgY Of HistOrical EveNts 1234 Pisa renews war against Genoa. 1235 Frederick announces his design for a Holy Roman Empire at a general assembly at Piacenza. 1236 Frederick assumes command against the Lombard League (originally including Padua, Vicenza, Venice, Crema, Cremona, Mantua, Piacenza, Bergamo, Brescia, Milan, Genoa, Bologna, Modena, Reggio Emilia, Treviso, Vercelli, Lodi, Parma, Ferrara, and a few others). Ezzelino da Romano controls Verona, Vicenza, and Padua.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunetto Latini's Tesoro in Print
    David Napolitano Ex Historia 19 David Napolitano1 University of Cambridge Brunetto Latini’s Tesoro in print Brunetto Latini (c. 1220-1294), a Florentine notary, wrote one of the first European encyclopaediae in the vernacular, Li Livres dou Tresor, during an exile in France (1260-1266/7).2 This literary work consists of three books, hence the plural in its title.3 The first book deals with theoretical knowledge. After a brief presentation of the encyclopaedia’s organisational plan this book starts with a discussion of theological matters. Its central section contains a universal history. It continues with physics, cosmology, and geography, and it ends with mechanical arts and a bestiary. The first section of the second book is a translation of Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, while the second part contains a panoply of moral precepts. The third and final book revolves around the art of rhetoric and politics. The Tresor instantly became a bestseller and its fortune extended widely beyond its place of origin. Originally written in the langue d’oïl (Old French) translations into Old Italian, generally referred to as the Tesoro, were quickly produced. The manuscript tradition spanned almost three centuries 1 David Napolitano ([email protected]) is a Ph.D Candidate in History at the University of Cambridge (2011-2014). Under the supervision of Professor David Abulafia he is preparing a thesis, entitled "The professional profile and moral code of conduct of the podestà in thirteenth-century Italy". His academic interest lies primarily in studying the political history of medieval Italy with an emphasis on the functioning of the podestà as a professional city magistrate, the development of a podestà literature, and the nexus between ethics and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Quarterly Books Received: January–March 2011
    Renaissance Quarterly Books Received: January–March 2011 EDITIONS AND TRANSLATIONS: Alexander, Gavin R. Writing after Sidney: The Literary Response to Sir Philip Sidney 1586– 1640. Paperback edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. xliv + 380 pp. index. illus. bibl. $55. ISBN: 978–0–19–959112–1. Barbour, Richmond. The Third Voyage Journals: Writing and Performance in the London East India Company, 1607–10. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 281 pp. index. append. illus. gloss. bibl. $75. ISBN: 978–0–230–61675–2. Buchanan, George. Poetic Paraphrase of The Psalms of David. Ed. Roger P. H. Green. Geneva: Librairie Droz S.A., 2011. 640 pp. index. append. bibl. $115. ISBN: 978–2–600–01445–8. Campbell, Gordon, and Thomas N. Corns, eds. John Milton: Life, Work, and Thought. Paperback edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. xv + 488 pp. index. illus. map. bibl. $24.95. ISBN: 978–0–19–959103–9. Calderini, Domizio. Commentary on Silius Italicus. Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance 477. Ed. Frances Muecke and John Dunston. Geneva: Librairie Droz S.A., 2010. 958 pp. index. tbls. bibl. $150. ISBN: 978–2–600–01434–2 (cl), 978–2–600–01434–2 (pbk). Campanella, Tommaso. Selected Philosophical Poems of Tommaso Campanella: A Bilingual Edition. Ed. Sherry L. Roush. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011. xi + 248 pp. index. bibl. $45. ISBN: 978–0–226–09205–8. Castner, Catherine J., trans. Biondo Flavio’s Italia Illustrata: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Volume 2: Central and Southern Italy. Binghamton: Global Academic Publishing, 2009. xvi + 488 pp. index. illus. map. bibl. $36. ISBN: 978–1–58684–278–9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Present and the History of the Own Time: an Historical Approach
    The present and the history of the own time: an historical approach Gonzalo Pasamar Alzuria Universidad de Zaragoza The expression ‘History of the Present’ spans over a diversity of trends different in their political birth, main issues, and historical traditions from which they have derived It is however true that from the nineties onward, the ‘Zeitsgeschichte’, the ‘Contemporary History’, and the ‘Histoire du Temps Present’, quoting only the most noteworthy, have underwent changes, and even have approximated to one another. Born in the period of Cold War, supported by institutions and journals, the disappearance of the Soviet Union and the globalization has obliged them to revise their former approaches, and provided them with new opportunities for research. Nevertheless, these all have coincided in being pioneers in signalling the importance of the twentieth century and recent times by claiming the importance that witnesses, memories, and proximity to events have for historians. Even they have shown highly aware of being breaking with clichés coming from the first generations of professional historians, who ignored the recent times because of an assumed lack of perspective, or influenced by the dictum that ‘history must be about the past’. It is not coincidence that some authors had considered them, beyond designations, as a ‘new history’ (Aróstegui 2004, 19-61). To the members of the French Institute d’ Histoire du Temps Present, for instance, this trend should be regarded as a ‘démarche’, as a way of representing the present in motion; a recent time –the time of the contemporary historian- where events, processes, and memories converge (Tresbitsch 1993, 65).
    [Show full text]
  • MACHIAVELLI and GUICCIARDINI: ANCIENTS and MODERNS J. G. A. Pocock
    Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory/Revue canadienne de thiorie politique et sociale, Vol. 2, No. 3 (Fall/ Automne 1978). MACHIAVELLI AND GUICCIARDINI : ANCIENTS AND MODERNS J. G. A. Pocock This essay's aim' is to examine the contention, put forward by such diverse scholars as Friedrich Meinecke, Leo Strauss and Felix Gilbert, that Machiavelli's thought and that of other Florentines such as Bernardo Rucellai,.marked the start ofthinking about "modern" politics and history . It also attempts to consider the paired terms "ancient" and "modern" - what they may mean and have meant, and how far it has been or may be useful to examine the two Florentines in the context of the relation between antiquity and modernity. Leo Strauss held that we were living in times when modernity had itself become a problem. One might say that the word has always been used to denote a consciously problematical view of the human condition ; but doubtless it was some highly self-confident brand of progressivist or dialectical modernism that Strauss had chiefly in mind. At a much simpler level, we can agree that the concept of modernity always presents a rather obvious problem, that of definition. Must we always mean the same thing? It would not be hard to show that the word modern is what we make of it; its meaning depends largely upon what we choose to place before it. If we ask whether there is a sense in which Machiavelli and Guicciardini have been, or may be, said to mark the beginnings of modern political thinking, the elementary thought should soon occur to us that what preceded them ought to be termed not ancient but medieval.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Fall: Vettori, Machiavelli, and the Refiguring of Italia in Sixteenth-Century Political Discourse
    After the Fall: Vettori, Machiavelli, and the Refiguring of Italia in Sixteenth-Century Political Discourse Robert A. Policelli A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2006 Approved by Advisor: Melissa M. Bullard Reader: Lloyd S. Kramer Reader: Jay M. Smith © 2006 Robert A. Policelli ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Robert A. Policelli After the Fall: Vettori, Machiavelli, and the Refiguring of Italia in Sixteenth-Century Political Discourse (Under the Direction of Melissa M. Bullard) This thesis tracks changes in political thought in the writings of Niccolò Machiavelli and Francesco Vettori between 1512 and the 1520s. While modern historians have traditionally emphasized the early phase of their correspondence, I examine two often overlooked sources from later years: the letters they exchanged in the 1520s and Vettori’s history, the Sommario della Istoria d’Italia. By the 1520s, the Italian political terrain had experienced sweeping and devastating transformations. I seek to explore the effects of those changes on these Florentines’ thinking by highlighting an idea common to both of their writings—Italia. Through contrast with Vettori’s thought, I contextualize the nature of Machiavelli’s political observations after he had spent a decade and a half in political exile, while also shedding light on the dynamism of Italia in early sixteenth-century political discourse and historiography. In a short epilogue I suggest some ways in which a rethinking of early modern perceptions of Italia can also contribute to modern theoretical debates about the meaning of “nation.” iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of the Renaissance Workshop, in particular John Headley, for comments on an early draft of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Thucydides Trap Lowell Gustafson Villanova University
    Elites and Imperial Ambitions: A Symposium The Real Thucydides Trap Lowell Gustafson Villanova University But he that desires to look into the truth of things done, and which (according to the condition of humanity) may be done again, or at least their like, he shall find enough herein to make him think it profitable. And it is compiled rather for an everlasting possession, than to be rehearsed for a prize. Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War, book I, chapter 22 (Hobbes’ translation.) The study of intellectual history is desirable for its own sake. Asking what ancient authors meant and how we should un- derstand them today is important, partly because we need to Study of an- consider how they might help us better deal with our pressing cient authors current problems. In this article, we consider a current prob- may help lem of politics and how an ancient author helps us approach with current problems. it. What does a book written 2,500 years ago have to offer us today? Is the condition of humanity indeed similar enough to think that what happened in an extraordinarily different time and condition could happen in some similar way? No doubt Thucydides would have been amazed by computers, airplanes, and all that distinguishes our age from his. But he may well have felt rather at home in many of the political relationships that characterize the human condition. Many since Thucydides’ time have found in his writing LOWEll GUSTAFSON is Professor of Political Science at Villanova University and a Senior Visiting Fellow at the Center for the Study of Statesmanship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historian Francesco Guicciardini Between Political Action and Historical Events*
    The Historian Francesco Guicciardini * between Political Action and Historical Events IGOR MELANI The ambassadors sent abroad are the eyes and ears of republics, and it is they who should be believed, not those who have a personal stake in affairs.1 1. The Statesman Portrayed When composing his Dialogo della mutatione di Firenze (Dialogue on the Revol- ution in Florence) around the year 1520, Bartolomeo Cerretani set the scene in Modena, where Giovanni di Bernardo Rucellai, Florentine ambassador to the King of France and a »Pallesco« (partisan of the Medicean faction), encountered two Florentine gentlemen who were »Frateschi« (partisans of the Savonarolan faction). After their unexpected meeting abroad, the three fellow citizens, at the suggestion of Giovanni Rucellai, decide to spend the evening together at the house of the Governor (»a casa il Governatore«), who at that time was Francesco Guicciardini (»el quale era ms. Francesco Guicciardini«). The host had been absent from Florence (as ambassador to the King of Ara- gon) during the period of regime change in 1512, when the so-called »popular Government«, led by the Gonfaloniere-for-life Francesco Soderini, was over- turned and the Medici family restored. The dialogue is prompted by his request for news on this delicate topic, but with an eight-year delay: on recent political history, Cerretani’s Guicciardini seems far from up-to-date. In accordance with Rucellai’s wishes, the structure of the Dialogo is conceiv- ed as a sort of debate between two voices, integrating that of the Pallesco Rucellai himself on one side (giving an account of the »fall of the popular government«), _____________ * Primary sources in this expanded version of the paper presented at the conference Humanis- tische Geschichten am Hof have been translated into English by Patrick Baker except where otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Machiavelli's Critique of Christianity
    MACHIAVELLI’S CRITIQUE OF CHRISTIANITY Paul-Erik Korvela The question of Machiavelli’s relation to religion in general and to Christianity in particular has aroused much discussion. There are scholars who claim that he was a sincere Christian in private life and constantly distressed by the fact that politics appears to operate by rules very different from the ones taught by Christ. Then there are those who claim that he was an atheist who aimed at devastating the whole of Christianity. In previous research, his opposition to Chris- tianity has been often assumed but seldom proved or clarified. This article aims to explore Machiavelli’s views on Christianity. Leaving aside the apparently insoluble question of his personal convictions,1 it will be argued that he nevertheless criticised Christianity for various reasons and thought that politics (or public ethics) is fundamentally incompatible with Christian ethics. His message was that politics (or arte dello stato) - when viewed from within the confines of a Christian Weltanschauung - is by nature always immoral. Hence, he does not separate politics and morality, but politics and Christian morality. As is commonly known, Machiavelli harked back to ancient Rome and its practices. The same methods were not used in his time, he thought, because Christianity had already carved men into its way of liking and made them effeminate and contemplative rather than virtuous and active. Machiavelli did not claim that it would be better for a society to eradicate religion altogether. Instead, he claimed that Christianity happens to be rather unsuited for a well-ordered state. Christianity contains some effective elements that were unavailable to paganism, and, when interpreted according to virtù, it, too, could 183 PAUL-ERIK KORVELA allow virtuous action in Machiavelli’s sense.
    [Show full text]