<<

LETTERS TO THE JOURNAL

Sir, microhaemangioma at the pupillary margin. Larger Recurrent Visual Loss Secondary to an Iris vascular malformations of the iris have previously been 2 Microhaemangioma documented by Fuchs.1 Cobb et at. described over lOO A 55-year-old woman presented to our casualty depart­ cases of 'vascular tufts' at the pupillary margin. They ment in August 1993 with a history of sudden loss of found an association with diabetes mellitus and myotonic vision and mild discomfort in the right eye shortly after dystrophy. These tufts occasionally bleed and because of waking up, She described her vision as being roughly rapid resolution, may mimic . They are hand movements, followed by rapid improvement half an thought to represent microhaemangiomas and fluorescein hour later. She had had three similar episodes in the pre­ studies have revealed them to be more numerous than can vious 6 months, each occurring shortly after awakening. be detected by direct inspection.' On two occasions she had presented to the casualty depart­ This particular case serves to remind us that in any ment some 5 hours later and a 'mild iritis' was diagnosed. patient who complains of transient loss of vision However, in this particular episode she had also noticed suggestive of amaurosis fugax but who is not examined 'blood in the eye' on inspection in the mirror. There was very soon after, an iris microhaemangioma ought to be no history of trauma or associated cardiac or neurological considered, especially if a few cells are later detected in symptoms. Her general health was good. the anterior chamber. Its recurrent nature shortly after At the time of examination 2 hours later, her visual awakening has not, to our knowledge, previously been acuity had already improved to 6/6. There was a I mm described and we wonder whether the formation of a small hyphaema in the right eye with a blood clot at the 6 0' clock posterior coupled with pupillary dilatation fol­ position of the pupillary margin (Fig. I). Intra-ocular lowing sleep miosis may account for this type of presen­ pressures measured 43 mmHg in the right eye and tation. The patient may describe seeing 'blood in the eye' 18 mmHg in the leftwit h open angles. Ocular and physi­ on looking in the mirror. A history of erythropsia or red cal examination revealed no further abnormality. desaturation may suggest the presence of blood in the After treatment with and a topical beta­ anterior chamber. Gonioscopy may be usefu l in revealing blocker, her intraocular pressure stabilised with complete a small resolving hyphaema. Unnecessary investigations resolution of the hyphaema by the next day. At the site of and treatment of the carotid circulation may thus be the previous clot on the pupillary margin, a small tuft avoided. could be seen at high magnification. There was also a small iris remnant on the capsule, which disappeared Frank G. Ah-Fat over the following few days. A full blood count, clotting Christopher R. Canning screen and urine analysis were normal. Southampton Eye Unit It seems likely that the source of the hyphaema was an Southampton General Hospital Tremona Road Southampton SO 16 6YD UK

R efe re nee s I. Fuchs E. Naevus pigmentosus und naevus vasculosus der Iris. Grades Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1913;86: 155-69. 2. Cobb B. Shilling JS. Chisholm IH. Vascular tufts at the pupillary margin in myotonic dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 1970;69: 573-82. 3. Rosen E, Lyons D. Microhaemangiomas at the pupillary border. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;67:846-53.

Sir, Associated with Coxsackie B Type 5 Infection

Fig. 1. The right eye showing a J mm hyphaema and a hlood A variety of ocular complications has recently been clot at the 6 0' clock position of the pupillary margin. described as accompaniments, usually rare, of Coxsackie

Eye (1994) 8, 357-369 © 1994 Royal College of Ophthalmologists