DOCSLIB.ORG

Arkansas 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arkansas 2020 AARRRKKKAAANNNSSSAAASSS 22002200 AA rreeppoorrtt oonn tthhee cchhaannggiinngg ddeemmooggrraapphhiiccss aanndd rreellaatteedd cchhaalllleennggeess ffaacciinngg AArrkkaannssaass’’ ssttaattee ggoovveerrnnmmeenntt iinn 22002200.. Produced in 2007 for Senator Shane Broadway and the 86th General Assembly of the State of Arkansas Arkansas 2020 FOREWORD, ARKANSAS 2020 To Governor Mike Beebe, Senate and House Members of the 86th General Assembly, and Concerned Citizens: The following Arkansas 2020 report provides a comprehensive analysis of the anticipated demographics changes and related challenges that Arkansas’ state government will face in 2020. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, Arkansas Tech University, and Arkansas State University who encouraged their faculty to assist in organizing and writing this comprehensive report. The report’s breadth and quality has exceeded my expectations. I would like to particularly thank Dr. Ty Borders, Associate Professor, UAMS College of Public Health, for coordinating this effort. It is critical that our state consider the anticipated challenges highlighted in the Arkansas 2020 report before we are in the midst of them. I encourage our state government to use the findings contained in the report to more effectively and efficiently plan and allocate resources to meet the future needs of Arkansans. Shane Broadway State Senator, District 22 1 Arkansas 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FACULTY COORDINATORS, ARKANSAS 2020...................................................................................10 OTHER MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS ........................................................................................................12 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY, ARKANSAS 2020.........................................................................13 CHAPTER 1. THE CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS OF ARKANSAS................................................15 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................15 HISTORIC AND PROJECTED POPULATION TRENDS OF ARKANSAS..............................................15 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................................................27 CHAPTER 2. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CONCERNS FOR 2020......................................29 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................29 PART A. HOW HEALTHY WILL ARKANSAS BE IN 2020?...............................................................31 ESTIMATES OF CHRONIC DISEASE AND RISKY BEHAVIORS .........................................................31 OVERVIEW OF CHRONIC DISEASE AND RISKY BEHAVIOR ESTIMATES .....................................31 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................31 FINDINGS .....................................................................................................................................................32 PART B. IMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC DISEASE AND RISKY BEHAVIORS ESTIMATES FOR THE CENTER FOR HEALTH ADVANCEMENT / DIVISION OF HEALTH..........................39 OVERVIEW OF CENTER’S MISSION .......................................................................................................39 POPULATION SUBGROUPS SERVED......................................................................................................39 MAJOR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES......................................................................................................39 PRIORITY CONCERNS FOR 2020 .............................................................................................................40 STRATEGIES FOR 2020 ..............................................................................................................................41 RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR 2020..........................................................................................................41 PART C. ESTIMATES OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE .............................................................................43 OVERVIEW OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE ESTIMATES............................................................................43 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................43 FINDINGS .....................................................................................................................................................43 PART D. IMPLICATIONS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE CHANGES FOR THE CENTER FOR HEALTH PROTECTION / DIVISION OF HEALTH.............................................................................49 OVERVIEW OF THE CENTER FOR HEALTH PROTECTION................................................................49 THE INFECTIOUS DISEASE BRANCH.....................................................................................................49 PART E. OTHER IMPLICATIONS OF POPULATION CHANGES FOR THE CENTER FOR HEALTH PROTECTION / DIVISION OF HEALTH.............................................................................52 PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE BRANCH..........................................................................................52 HEALTH SYSTEMS LICENSING/REGULATION BRANCH...................................................................52 PART F. IMPLICATIONS OF ARKANSAS’ CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS FOR THE DIVISION OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.........................................................................54 MISSION AND PROFILE.............................................................................................................................54 PRIORITY CONCERNS FOR 2020 .............................................................................................................54 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS ISSUES AND CONCERNS ........................................................................55 PART G. IMPLICATIONS OF ARKANSAS’ CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS FOR THE DIVISION OF YOUTH SERVICES ..........................................................................................................56 MISSION AND PROFILE.............................................................................................................................56 2 Arkansas 2020 MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS FOR DYS ..........................................................................................56 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS PRIORITY ISSUES AND CONCERNS.....................................................57 PART H. IMPLICATIONS OF ARKANSAS’ CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS FOR THE DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES ........................................................58 MISSION AND PROFILE.............................................................................................................................58 MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS FOR DDS ..........................................................................................59 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS PRIORITY ISSUES AND CONCERNS.....................................................61 PART I. HUMAN SERVICES NEEDS FOR OLDER ARKANSANS IN 2020 .....................................64 REVIEW OF PROJECTED INCREASES IN THE NUMBER OF OLDER ARKANSANS.......................64 PART J. IMPLICATIONS OF ARKANSAS’ CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS FOR THE DIVISION OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES ......................................................................................................68 MISSION AND PROFILE.............................................................................................................................68 PRIORITY CONCERNS FOR 2020 .............................................................................................................70 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS..........................................................71 PART K. IMPLICATIONS OF ARKANSAS’ CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS FOR DIVISION OF VOLUNTEERISM.......................................................................................................................................76 MISSION AND PROFILE.............................................................................................................................76 MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS FOR DIVISION OF VOLUNTEERISM...........................................77 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS..........................................................77 PART L. IMPLICATIONS OF ARKANSAS’ CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS FOR THE DIVISION OF COUNTY OPERATIONS .................................................................................................79 MISSION AND PROFILE.............................................................................................................................79 MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS ............................................................................................................79 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS..........................................................80 DIVISION’S CAPACITY TO RESPOND TO DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES............................................81 CHAPTER 3. RESOURCES.......................................................................................................................82
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arkansas Water Pollution Control Commission 6Rder No
    ARKANSAS WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION 6RDER NO. 1-58 IN THE MATTER OF THE POLLUTION OF THE LOWER OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES BY SALT WATER ~~D OTHER OIL FIELD WASTES. Filed in this office on the 20th day of February. 1964. ?CLLUI'IC1 CCNT?.C L CCl·&~ISSICN IN TEE MATT3R CF THZ 7-'GLLl.i'TICi'! ) ) r'F THS LCHER \Uf.CH !TA RIVE::'. .t;.ND ) ) No. 1-58 TP.I""'UTAP.I'ZS .. y SAL'T HAT3R Al'-"!D ) ) CTHZR CIL :r"IELD ~~!ASTE3 ) CRDSR. FEEREA3, pursuant to the provisions of Act 472 of the Acts of Ar!<ansas for 1949, the ~.rkansas ~vater :?ollution Control Commis- sion, hereinafter referred to as the "CommissionH, is authorized to adopt rules and regulations to prevent pollutL.:-::."1 .s.nd to ma!~e and alter reasonable o~ders requiring the discontinuance of discharge of sewage, industrial wastes, or other wastes into any of the waters of the State; and ~~~RZA3, investigations conducted by the Commission have established that enormous quantities of salt water and other oil field wastes are being cischerged each dc:.y from oil and gas wells into the waters of the !~uachita P..iver (below 7~iver hile 312) and the tributaries thereof, including Lapile Cree~-{, Nill Creek and Smackover Creek, hereinafter collectively referred to as the •:tower Cuachita River Drainage ':asinn; and HF..S~EA3, oil and gas wells in the Lower Cuachita River Drainage :>.asin discharge more than 19,200,000 2;allons of salt water per day, equivalent to over 12,500,000 pounds of dry salt, the sub- stant:ial part of which flows into the Cuachita River; and \:? 1:::::'2t<>, the dischar~e of said salt water and other oil field wastes has produced excessive and abnormal salinity and ab- normally lm.v p~: value in t:he "Jat:s::s of the Lower ~uachita :S.iver Drainage ~asin, thereby substantially impairin3 the quality of said~ .
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas System-Level Strategy for Student Success
    Continuous Improvement FOR College Completion: Arkansas Builds a System-Level Strategy for Community College Student Success Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables .................................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Improving Educational Achievement in Arkansas ............................................................................................................................................3 Toward a State-wide Culture of Student Success and Continuous Improvement: The Role of the Arkansas Association of Two-Year Colleges .............................................................................................................................7 The Arkansas System-Level Strategy for Student Success .................................................................................................................................8 Inside the Strategy’s Framework .......................................................................................................................................................................8 The System-Level Strategy in Practice in Arkansas .........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • A Clean Energy Economy for Arkansas
    NRDC Issue Paper November 2009 A Clean Energy Economy for Arkansas Analysis of the Rural Economic Development Potential of Renewable Resources Author Martin R. Cohen NRDC Project Contact Pierre Bull About NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Montana, and Beijing. Visit us at www.nrdc.org. Acknowledgments To come. For questions and further information on this report, please contact Pierre Bull, NRDC at [email protected] or (212) 727-4606. NRDC Director of Communications: Phil Gutis NRDC Marketing and Operations Director: Alexandra Kennaugh NRDC Publications Director: Lisa Goffredi NRDC Publications Editor: Anthony Clark Production: Jon Prinsky Copyright 2009 by the Natural Resources Defense Council. For additional copies of this report, send $5.00 plus $3.95 shipping and handling to NRDC Reports Department, 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011. California residents must add 7.5% sales tax. Please make checks payable to NRDC in U.S. dollars. This report is printed on paper that is 100 percent postconsumer recycled fiber, processed chlorine free. Natural Resources Defense Council I ii A Clean Energy Economy for Arkansas: Analysis of the Rural Economic Development Potential
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 IRP Filing 103112.Pdf
    Entergy Arkansas, Inc. APSC FILED Time: 10/31/2012 2:33:12 PM: Recvd 10/31/2012 2:30:51 PM: Docket 07-016-U-Doc. 24 425 West Capitol Avenue P. O. Box 551 Little Rock, AR 72203-0551 Tel 501 377 4457 Fax 501 377 4415 Steven K. Strickland Vice President Regulatory Affairs October 31, 2012 Ms. Kristi Rhude Arkansas Public Service Commission P. O. Box 400 1000 Center Street Little Rock, AR 72203 Re: APSC Docket No. 07-016-U Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 2012 Integrated Resource Plan Dear Ms. Rhude: Consistent with Section 6 of Attachment 1 to the Arkansas Public Service Commission (“Commission”) Order No. 6 – Docket No. 06-028-R Resource Planning Guidelines for Electric Utilities, Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (“EAI”) submits the following: a) its 2012 Integrated Resource Plan (the “IRP”); b) the Stakeholder Report that was prepared in accordance with Section 4.8 of the Commission’s Resource Planning Guidelines; c) the presentations made by EAI in connection with its July 31, 2012 Stakeholder Meeting; and d) EAI’s responses to Stakeholder’s questions at the Stakeholder Meeting. Should you have any questions concerning this filing, please call me at (501) 377-4457 or Laura Landreaux at (501) 377-5876. Sincerely, /s/ Steven K. Strickland SS Attachments c: All Parties of Record APSC FILED Time: 10/31/2012 2:33:12 PM: Recvd 10/31/2012 2:30:51 PM: Docket 07-016-U-Doc. 24 Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 2012 Integrated Resource Plan October 31, 2012 APSC FILED Time: 10/31/2012 2:33:12 PM: Recvd 10/31/2012 2:30:51 PM: Docket 07-016-U-Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis Powellii I
    Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis powellii I. Lea, 1852) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office Conway, Arkansas 5-YEAR REVIEW Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis powellii I. Lea, 1852) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete review Public notice of the initiation of this 5-year review was given in the Federal Register on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53127-53129) and a 60 day comment period was opened. During the comment period, we did not receive any additional information about Arkansas fatmucket (Lampsilis powelllii) other than specific information from biologists familiar with the species. This review was completed by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Arkansas Field Office. Arkansas fatmucket only occurs in the state of Arkansas. Literature and documents on file at the Arkansas Field Office were used for this review. All recommendations resulting from this review are a result of thoroughly reviewing the best available information on the Arkansas fatmucket and the reviewer’s expertise as one of the leading authorities on this species. Comments and suggestions regarding the review were received from Arkansas Field Office supervisors and peer reviews from outside the Service (see Appendix A). No part of the review was contracted to an outside party. B. Reviewers Lead Region – Southeast Region: Nikki Lamp, (404) 679-7118 Lead Field Office – Conway, Arkansas: Chris Davidson, (501) 513-4481 C. Background 1. Federal Register Notice initiating this review: September 8, 2006. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Review of 14 Southeastern Species. (71 FR 53127) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water Under Scarcity Conditions Tyler Robert Knapp University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water under Scarcity Conditions Tyler Robert Knapp University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Agricultural Economics Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Knapp, Tyler Robert, "Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water under Scarcity Conditions" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1809. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1809 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Water under Scarcity Conditions A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture Economics by Tyler R. Knapp University of Georgia Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, 2008 Oregon State University Bachelor of Science in Environmental Economics and Policy, 2014 December 2016 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. Dr. Qiuqiong Huang Dr. Kent Kovacs Thesis Director Co-director Dr. Stijn Speelman Dr. Jennie S. Popp Committee Member Committee Member Dr. Bruce L. Dixon Dr. Rodolfo N. Nayga, Jr. Committee Member Committee Member Abstract Reliance of Arkansas agricultural producers on groundwater for irrigation has led to depletion of the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer. Without intervention, consequences include insufficient groundwater to meet irrigation demand as well as drawdown of the deeper Sparta Aquifer, upon which communities in eastern Arkansas rely for non-agricultural use.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Added Economic Impact of Agriculture in Arkansas
    Value Added Economic Impact of Agriculture in Arkansas Inside Value Added ..................................... 3 Arkansas Counts on Agriculture .................................... 5 2 Home Grown & Home Cooking .................................. 6 Agriculture in the Knowledge-Based Economy ........... 9 Arkansas is Our Campus ................. 10 University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture ..................... 11 Produced by the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture 2404 N. University Ave. Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 www.uaex.edu/division.htm Value In / Value Out Value Added Agriculture accounts for nearly $1 out of every $5 of added value in the state’s economy. “Value Added” is the total contribution to the economy of employee, owner and property income, 3 plus indirect business taxes. Total Impact of Value added as a result of agricultural and forestry Arkansas Agriculture production and processing in Arkansas was $13.1 billion in 2001, the latest year for which relevant ■ Employment — 291,290 jobs statistics are available. That was 19.6 percent of the (1 out of 5 Arkansas jobs) total value added in the state’s economy. ■ Wages — $7.8 Billion The agriculture and forestry sector provided 291,290 (12.7 percent of Arkansas wages) jobs and $7.8 billion in labor income. ■ Value Added — $13.1 Billion ($1 of every $5 of added value in Arkansas) A detailed analysis is provided in “Impact of the Agricultural Sector on the Arkansas Economy in 2001,” by J. Popp, G. Vickery, H.L Goodwin, and W. Miller. Research Report 975. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville. 4 Arkansas Counts on Agriculture rkansas led the Southeast region in the percentage of the economy contributed by agriculture in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Millipeds (Arthropoda: Diplopoda) of the Ark-La- Tex
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ScholarWorks@UARK Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 56 Article 16 2002 Millipeds (Arthropoda: Diplopoda) of the Ark-La- Tex. II. Distributional Records for Some Species of Western and Central Arkansas and Easter and Southeastern Oklahoma Chris T. McAllister Texas A&M University-Texarkana Rowland M. Shelley North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences James T. McAllister III W. T. White High School Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation McAllister, Chris T.; Shelley, Rowland M.; and McAllister, James T. III (2002) "Millipeds (Arthropoda: Diplopoda) of the Ark-La- Tex. II. Distributional Records for Some Species of Western and Central Arkansas and Easter and Southeastern Oklahoma," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 56 , Article 16. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol56/iss1/16 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Development Lesson Plan
    Arkansas State Archives Arkansas Digital Archives Lesson plans Educators Railroad development lesson plan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalheritage.arkansas.gov/lesson-plans Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Railroad development lesson plan, Arkansas history lesson plans, Arkansas State Archives, Little Rock, Arkansas. Use and reproduction of images held by the Arkansas State Archives without prior written permission is prohibited. For information on reproducing images held by the Arkansas State Archives, please call 501-682-6900 or email at [email protected]. Arkansas railroad development lesson plan, Arkansas State Archives, Little Rock, Arkansas. ‘The Advance Guard of Civilization’ The Impact of Railroad Development on the History and Economy of Arkansas and the Nation Social Studies – 6 – 8 (U.S. History, Arkansas History, World History, Civics, etc.); English Language Arts; Geography This unit explores the development of railroads and their impact on the economic development of Arkansas through the use of primary and secondary sources. Students will read newspaper articles and pamphlet excerpts to understand how the railroads affected industry and settlement across the state. A list of various activities related to original primary and secondary resources allows teacher the flexibility to choose parts of this lesson plan to use and adapt to various types of students. Essential Question: How did the development of railroads in Arkansas
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Community College at Batesville, a Rural Community in North Central Arkansas
    NEA Grant Search - Data as of 02-10-2020 14 matches Sonny Boy Blues Society (aka King Biscuit Blues Festival) 1846676-31-19 Helena, AR 72342-3542 To support the King Biscuit Blues Festival. The multi-day festival will feature as many as 250 blues and gospel artists on several stages, in free and ticketed performances. Ancillary educational and personal enrichment activities will include a Blues-in-Schools program at as many as three public schools and the Boys & Girls Club of Phillips County, as well as a free Blues Symposium open to musicians and the community, at which guest artists will provide insights on music marketing and public relations strategies in an increasingly technology-driven world. Fiscal Year: 2019 Congressional District: 1 Grant Amount: $25,000 Category: Art Works Discipline: Music Grant Period: 01/2019 - 10/2019 Ozark Foothills Filmfest, Inc. 1853150-78-19 Locust Grove, AR 72550-9723 To support the annual Ozark Foothills FilmFest showcasing independent, narrative, and documentary films. The festival will focus on films that provide authentic portrayals of the people, places, and practices unique to rural America. Film screenings, question-and-answer sessions, and a filmmaker panel discussion will take place at the University of Arkansas Community College at Batesville, a rural community in north central Arkansas. Fiscal Year: 2019 Congressional District: 1 Grant Amount: $10,000 Category: Challenge America Discipline: Challenge America Grant Period: 01/2019 - 05/2019 Oxford American Literary Project (aka The Oxford American) 1847421-52-19 Little Rock, AR 72202-5034 To support payments to writers for The Oxford American magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Interpretive Plan, 2009-2018, Arkansas Post National Memorial
    Arkansas Post National Memorial Edquist Davis Exhibits 2009–2018 Under contract with National Park Service Harpers Ferry Center Interpretive Planning Long-Range Interpretive Plan Long-Range Interpretive Plan Feb 2009 images in this report are the photography of Edward E. Wood, Jr. Superintendent, Arkansas Post National Memorial 2 Arkansas Post National Memorial Executive Summary In 1686, Henri de Tonti established a trading post known as “Poste de Arkansea” at the Quapaw Indian village of Osotouy. It was the first semi-permanent French settlement in the lower Mississippi River Valley. From its establishment through the Civil War, the Post has been strategically important for Quapaw Indians, as well as French, Spanish, American, and Confederate militaries. Located at the northern edge of t he Gulf coastal plain, Arkansas Post’s ecosystem ranges from prairie grasses and bottomland hardwood forests to wetland marshes near the bayous and river. The Memorial Unit consists of 389 acres and includes the park’s visitor center and a 2.5-mile trail system. A paved trail leads visitors through the park’s natural and cultural resources: the historic townsite, the cistern, Post Bend, the Confederate trenches, the Arkansas River overlook, and around Park Lake. An unpaved nature trail leads visitors along the shoreline of Post Bayou and over Alligator Slough. The Osotouy Unit includes 360 acres about five miles by air and 30 miles by paved roads from the Memorial Unit. It protects the Menard Hodges Archeological Site, a Quapaw burial ground, where Quapaw remains were recently re-interred. It is located on the southeastern edge of an elevated prairie ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Esources Arkansas
    United States l Department of Agriculture Forest esources Forest Service Southern Forest Arkansas Experiment Station New Orleans, Louisiana Roy C. Beltz, Daniel F. Bertelson, Joanne L. Faulkner, and Dennis M. May Resource Bulletin SO-169 February 1992 SUMMARY The 1988 Forest Survey of Arkansas revealed new trends in forest resources. After decades of decline, forest area increased 3 percent. Pine plantation acreage increased substantially while acreage in natural pine stands decreased. Softwood inventory was down 5 percent, with growth also declining. Loblolly pine volume exceeded that of shortleaf pine for the first time in Arkansas his- tory. The outlook for hardwood resources is positive. Inventory and growth have increased, and loss of bottomland hardwood acreage appeared to be at a standstill. Front cover: Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image of Arkansas produced from data collected by the NOAA-11 satellite of the Nation- al Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on April 11, 1991. In general, forest land is dark red; nonforest land is light red or blue; water is dark blue. CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS ........................................ INTRODUCTION ................................... ...2 HISTORY OF ARKANSAS FORESTS .................... .3 FOREST AREA ...................................... .5 SurveyRegions ...................................... The Delta Region .................................. .5 The Ouachita Region ............................... .7 The Ozark Region .................................. .7 The Southwest
    [Show full text]