DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Vermont's Response to Petition for Federal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of Vermont's Response to Petition for Federal STATE OF VERMONT‘S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE ST. FRANCIS/SOKOKI BAND OF THE ABENAKI NATION OF VERMONT STATE OF VERMONT WILLIAM H. SORRELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL Eve Jacobs-Carnahan, Special Assistant Attorney General December 2002 Second Printing, January 2003 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. v MAP ......................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. vii INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND...............................................................................................1 Historic Tribe Elusive ...................................................................................................1 Major Scholars of the Western Abenakis .....................................................................3 SEVENTEENTH CENTURY .......................................................................................5 Seventeenth-Century History is Sketchy ......................................................................5 Some Noteworthy Events of the Seventeenth-Century ................................................7 EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ..........................................................................................8 Population Movements In and Out of Missisquoi During the Eighteenth Century ..........................................................................................................................8 Grey Lock‘s Dominance ..................................................................................10 Epidemic and Slow Repopulation: 1730-1740 ...............................................11 Missisquoi Villagers Move to Odanak/St. Francis: 1744-1760 ......................12 Return to Missisquoi: 1763-1775.....................................................................16 Abandonment of Missisquoi During American Revolution ............................22 NINETEENTH CENTURY.........................................................................................28 The Insubstantial Evidence of Continued Tribal Presence in the Nineteenth Century ........................................................................................................................28 Comments on Recent Scholarship ..............................................................................36 i Countervailing Evidence that the Missisquoi Did Not Return to Vermont as a Tribe After 1800 ..............................................................................................41 Travelers, Historians, and Surveyors of Indians ..............................................41 Federal Census Enumerations ..........................................................................46 Sightings of Indian Visitors and the Basket Trade ..........................................50 Rowland Robinson‟s Indian Friends ................................................................55 French-Canadian Migration to Vermont .........................................................61 Caughnawagha Claims Presented to Vermont Legislature .........................................64 TWENTIETH CENTURY...........................................................................................67 Twentieth Century Claims of Abenaki Continuity .....................................................67 The Eugenics Survey of Vermont ...............................................................................67 ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA ....................................................................................................78 CRITERION (A)—IDENTIFICATION BY OUTSIDERS ....................................................78 1900 to 1929 ...............................................................................................................82 Researchers Identify Vermont Abenakis as Tribe of the Past ........................82 Federal Government Records Identify Only a Tiny Number of Individual Indians ...........................................................................................87 Records of the Vermont Eugenics Survey Do Not Identify Any Abenakis ..........................................................................................................89 Newspapers Fail to Identify Any Abenaki Tribe in Vermont ........................92 Swanton Birth Records ...................................................................................93 1930 to 1947 ...............................................................................................................94 External Observers Silent on Existence of Any Contemporary Abenaki Tribe .................................................................................................94 ii 1948 to 1973 ................................................................................................................96 Researchers Failed to Discover Any Contemporary Vermont Abenaki Tribe .................................................................................................96 Other Material Attests to Absence of Abenaki Tribe From Vermont ..........108 1974 to 1981 ..............................................................................................................110 External Observations ...................................................................................110 1982 to Present ..........................................................................................................118 External Observations ...................................................................................118 Summary of Failure of Evidence to Satisfy Criterion (a) .........................................119 CRITERION (B)—COMMUNITY ......................................................................................121 Swanton Church is French Canadian, not Indian ......................................................123 No Indian Cemetery was Used by Petitioner‘s Ancestors in Twentieth Century ......126 No Indian School Existed in Franklin County ..........................................................128 Petitioner‟s Ancestors Were Active Participants in White Business and Social Groups ............................................................................................................128 There Has Not Been a Continuous Geographic Concentration of Indians in Franklin County .........................................................................................................131 The Petitioner Did Not Immigrate to Vermont as a Group at Any One Time...........132 The Abenaki Language Was Not Spoken by Petitioner ...........................................140 Cultural Practices Were Not Retained in Any Abenaki Community in Vermont ....................................................................................................................141 Membership in the St. Francis/Sokoki Abenaki is Loose and Fluid .........................142 There Were No Social Ties Between the Bulk of Petitioner‟s Ancestors and the Visible Abenakis in Vermont ........................................................................144 Summary of Failure of Evidence to Satisfy Criterion (b) ..........................................147 iii CRITERION (C)—POLITICAL AUTHORITY ..................................................................148 Vermont Abenaki Silence in the Face of 1950‟s Caughnawagha Land Claims ........149 Creation of Abenaki Tribal Council in 1974 .............................................................152 The Petitioner‟s Political Organization was Dominated by One or Two Families ......................................................................................................................154 Summary of Failure of Evidence to Satisfy Criterion (c) ..........................................160 CRITERION (E)—DESCENT FROM HISTORIC TRIBE .................................................160 An Overview of the Progenitors ...............................................................................162 Moody‟s Genealogical Work is Incomplete and Speculative ...................................166 Petitioner‟s Family Charts Do Not Trace Back to Any Historic Lists of Known Abenaki Indians ...........................................................................................169 Petitioner‟s Family Charts Do Not Include Anyone Identified by Federal Census as Indian From 1870 to 1910 ........................................................................172 Petitioner‟s Other Lists From Censuses are Speculative ..........................................175 Petitioner‘s Evidence of Indian Births is Contradicted by the Original Records ......................................................................................................................177 Individual Family Genealogies Contain Unproven Assumptions of Abenaki Heritage ......................................................................................................................183 Petitioner Self-Identified as White ............................................................................191 Summary of Failure of Evidence to Satisfy Criterion (e) .........................................194 CONCLUSION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "I'm Glad to Hear That You Liked M Y Little Article": Letters Exchanged
    "I'm glad to hear that you liked my little article": Letters Exchanged Between Frank T. Siebert and Fannie Hardy Eckstorm, 1938-1945 PAULEENA MACDOUGALL University of Maine Writing from his home at 127 Merbrook Lane, Merion Station, Pennsylvania, on 9 January 1938, Dr. Frank T. Siebert, Jr., penned the following: Dear Mrs. Eckstorm: Many thanks for your very nice letter. I am glad to hear that you liked my little article. I have several others, longer and of broader scope, in preparation, but they probably will not appear for some time to come. One of these is a volume of Penobscot linguistic texts, of which Dr. Speck and I are joint authors. The letter quoted above and others to follow offer a glimpse into the thoughts of two very different people who shared an interest in the Penobscot Indians: one, a woman of 73 years who had already published seven books and numerous articles at the time the two began correspond­ ing, the other a 26-year-old medical doctor. Siebert studied at Episcopal Academy, Haverford College, and received his M.D. at the University of Pennsylvania, where he made the acquaintance of anthropologist Frank Speck. The young doctor attended summer institutes in linguistics where he encountered Algonquianists such as Leonard Bloomfield, Edward Sapir and Mary Haas. His ability in the field of linguistics did not go unnoticed at the University of Pennsylvania, because Speck asked him to lecture in his anthropology class. Siebert visited the Penobscot Indian Reservation in 1932 for the first time and collected vocabulary and stories from Penobscot speakers thereafter on his summer vacations.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People of Western New York
    FACT SHEET / FEBRUARY 2018 Indigenous People of Western New York Kristin Szczepaniec Territorial Acknowledgement In keeping with regional protocol, I would like to start by acknowledging the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and by honoring the sovereignty of the Six Nations–the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora–and their land where we are situated and where the majority of this work took place. In this acknowledgement, we hope to demonstrate respect for the treaties that were made on these territories and remorse for the harms and mistakes of the far and recent past; and we pledge to work toward partnership with a spirit of reconciliation and collaboration. Introduction This fact sheet summarizes some of the available history of Indigenous people of North America date their history on the land as “since Indigenous people in what is time immemorial”; some archeologists say that a 12,000 year-old history on now known as Western New this continent is a close estimate.1 Today, the U.S. federal government York and provides information recognizes over 567 American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes and villages on the contemporary state of with 6.7 million people who identify as American Indian or Alaskan, alone Haudenosaunee communities. or combined.2 Intended to shed light on an often overlooked history, it The land that is now known as New York State has a rich history of First includes demographic, Nations people, many of whom continue to influence and play key roles in economic, and health data on shaping the region. This fact sheet offers information about Native people in Indigenous people in Western Western New York from the far and recent past through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Champlain Coordinates: 44°32′N 73°20′W from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Lake Champlain Coordinates: 44°32′N 73°20′W From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Lake Champlain (French: lac Champlain) is a natural, Lake Champlain freshwater lake in North America, located mainly within the borders of the United States (states of Vermont and New York) but partially situated across the Canada—United States border in the Canadian province of Quebec. The New York portion of the Champlain Valley includes the eastern portions of Clinton County and Essex County. Most of this area is part of the Adirondack Park. There are recreational opportunities in the park and along the relatively undeveloped coastline of Lake Champlain. The cities of Lake Champlain near Burlington in early twilight Plattsburgh and Burlington are to the north and the village of Location New York / Vermont in USA; and Ticonderoga in the southern part of the region. The Quebec portion is located in the regional county municipalities of Le Quebec in Canada Haut- Richelieu and Brome–Missisquoi. Coordinates 44°32′N 73°20′W Primary Otter Creek, Winooski River, inflows Missisquoi River, Lamoille River, Contents Ausable River, Chazy River, Boquet River, Saranac River 1 Geology Primary Richelieu River 1.1 Hydrology outflows 1.2 Chazy Reef Catchment 21,326 km2 (8,234 sq mi) 2 History area 2.1 Colonial America and the Basin Canada, United States Revolutionary War countries 2.2 War of 1812 2.3 Modern history Max. le ngth 201 km (125 mi) 2.4 "Champ", Lake Champlain Max. width 23 km (14 mi) monster Surface 1,269 km2 (490 sq mi) 2.5 Ecology area 2.6 Railroad Average 19.5 m (64 ft) 3 Natural history depth 4 Infrastructure 122 m (400 ft) 4.1 Lake crossings Max.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphology of Modern Western Abenaki
    The Morphology of Modern Western Abenaki Jesse Beach ‘04 Honors Thesis Dartmouth College Program of Linguistics & Cognitive Science Primary Advisor: Prof. David Peterson Secondary Advisor: Prof. Lindsay Whaley May 17, 2004 Acknowledgements This project has commanded a considerable amount of my attention and time over the past year. The research has lead me not only into Algonquian linguistics, but has also introduced me to the world of Native American cultures. The history of the Abenaki people fascinated me as much as their language. I must extnd my fullest appreciate to my advisor David Peterson, who time and again proposed valuable reference suggestions and paths of analysis. The encouragement he offered was indispensable during the research and writing stages of this thesis. He also went meticulously through the initial drafts of this document offering poignant comments on content as well as style. My appreciation also goes to my secondary advisor Lindsay Whaley whose door is always open for a quick chat. His suggestions helped me broaden the focus of my research. Although I was ultimately unable to arrange the field research component of this thesis, the generosity of the Dean of Faculty’s Office and the Richter Memorial Trust Grant that I received from them assisted me in gaining a richer understanding of the current status of the Abenaki language. With the help of this grant, I was able to travel to Odanak, Quebec to meet the remaining speakers of Abenaki. From these conversations I was able to locate additional materials that aided me tremendously in my analysis. Many individuals have offered me assistance in one form or another throughout the unfolding of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY and LAW of VERMONT TOWN ROADS (11.3.14 Version)
    THE HISTORY AND LAW OF VERMONT TOWN ROADS (11.3.14 version) Author: Paul S. Gillies Montpelier, Vermont This article is made available to the Vermont Agency of Transportation Mapping Section website courtesy of the author - November 2014 The History and Law of Vermont Town Roads THE HISTORY AND LAW OF VERMONT TOWN ROADS (11.3.14 version) 1. Introduction In the beginning there was the landscape, crushed and folded and drained. The valleys and the mountains and the waters determined how people moved on that landscape, by foot or horse or canoe, for thousands of years. Animal paths became foot paths for human traffic, and horses. When settlers arrived, the paths grew into trails, which became town roads. The road network is a town’s history carved in dirt and gravel. There is no more permanent monument to the first settlers. Buildings collapse, are abandoned or replaced. Landscapes change from open to wooded in a few years. But highways rarely change. They may stray from their original beds, as sharp corners get rounded and wet spots are avoided, but they leave deep creases on the face of the town. Until something happens, we take roads for granted. When a bridge goes out, a stretch of gravel road is swept away in a flood, the snow accumulates in high drifts, when the roadbed is deep with mud or ribbed for our jostling pleasure, only then do we think about these ribbons of public property. In law, they are called public easements or public rights-of-way. Other than schools, the most important function of local government is maintenance of highways.
    [Show full text]
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Iroquois Confederacy?
    04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 82 What was the 4 Iroquois Confederacy? Chapter Focus Questions •What was the social structure of Iroquois society? •What opportunities did people have to participate in decision making? •What were the ideas behind the government of the Iroquois Confederacy? The last chapter explored the government of ancient Athens. This chapter explores another government with deep roots in history: the Iroquois Confederacy. The Iroquois Confederacy formed hundreds of years ago in North America — long before Europeans first arrived here. The structure and principles of its government influenced the government that the United States eventually established. The Confederacy united five, and later six, separate nations. It had clear rules and procedures for making decisions through representatives and consensus. It reflected respect for diversity and a belief in the equality of people. Pause The image on the side of this page represents the Iroquois Confederacy and its five original member nations. It is a symbol as old as the Confederacy itself. Why do you think this symbol is still honoured in Iroquois society? 82 04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 83 What are we learning in this chapter? Iroquois versus Haudenosaunee This chapter explores the social structure of Iroquois There are two names for society, which showed particular respect for women and the Iroquois people today: for people of other cultures. Iroquois (ear-o-kwa) and Haudenosaunee It also explores the structure and processes of Iroquois (how-den-o-show-nee). government. Think back to Chapter 3, where you saw how Iroquois is a name that the social structure of ancient Athens determined the way dates from the fur trade people participated in its government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Character of Vermont : Twentieth-Anniversary Reflections Michael Sherman
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Center for Research on Vermont Occasional Papers Research Centers and Institutes 1996 The character of Vermont : twentieth-anniversary reflections Michael Sherman Jennie G. Versteeg Samuel B. Hand Paul S. Gillies Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/crvocc Recommended Citation Sherman, Michael; Versteeg, Jennie G.; Hand, Samuel B.; and Gillies, Paul S., "The character of Vermont : twentieth-anniversary reflections" (1996). Center for Research on Vermont Occasional Papers. 5. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/crvocc/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Centers and Institutes at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Research on Vermont Occasional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OCCASIONAL PAPER #19 CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON VERMONT UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT BURLINGTON, VERMONT . ... : . ~.._ - - THE CHARACTER OF VERMONT Twentieth-Anniversary Reflections By MICHAEL SHERMAN and JENNIE VERSTEEG SAMUEL B. HAND and PAUL GILLIES WILB F ,Sfen 19'/b ~ ./ © 1996 by the University of Vermont. All rights reserved ISBN 0-944277-34-9 The Center for Research on Vermont University of Vermont Burlington, VT 05401-3439 802/656-43 89 email: [email protected] ...Wil!Ul CuONiVITi"iT LU CTIO yN J Of V!l!AONT l1 81A!T Contents Foreword Paul Eschholz . v11 Part 1 The Character of Vermont: Then and Now The Character of Vermont: Then and Now Michael Sherman and Jennie Versteeg . 1 Appendix 1. Taylor's "Sample" of Vermonters .............. ... ...... 35 Appendix 2. Taylor's Respondents ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog
    Nutrient Loading and Impacts in Lake Champlain – Missisquoi Bay and Lake Memphremagog Missisquoi Bay. IJC Collection Lake Memphremagog. IJC Collection Missisquoi Bay Cyanobacteria. Pierre Leduc Prepared by the International Joint Commission April 21, 2020 Table of Contents I. Synthesis Document ........................................................................................................................ 3 A. Context ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Cyanobacteria .................................................................................................................................. 3 Actions and Consequences of Non-action ........................................................................................ 3 The Governments’ Reference ........................................................................................................... 4 IJC’s Approach to the Reference ...................................................................................................... 5 Workshops to Review Science and Policy on Nutrient Loading ........................................................ 6 Public Meeting and Online Consultation .......................................................................................... 6 B. IJC Analysis of SAG Reports ....................................................................................................... 7 C. Common Basin Recommendations and IJC Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan County Names
    Michigan County Names By Mark Putnam INTRODUCTION This anthology is a compilation of exhilarating poems. This book is filled with many poetic and historic gems. The counties of Michigan are listed below in alphabetical order. In total, there are eighty-three. I invite you to become an avid and excited reader. From each poem, you will come away with a bit of knowledge on the origin and meaning of the name of each Michigan county. The poems will make you think profoundly. They will cause you to look richer and deeper in the meaning of each Michigan county. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 Alcona .................................................................................................................... 8 Alger ....................................................................................................................... 9 Allegan ................................................................................................................. 10 Alpena .................................................................................................................. 11 Antrim .................................................................................................................. 12 Arenac .................................................................................................................. 13 Baraga .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Lock and Theyanoguin: Case Studies in Native Diaspora, Cultural Adaptation and Persistence After King Philip's
    James Duggan NEH Living on the Edge of Empire Gateway Regional High School Grades 10-12. Grey Lock and Theyanoguin: Case Studies in Native Diaspora, Cultural Adaptation and Persistence After King Philip’s War Central Historical Question: In what ways did Woronoco and other Native peoples of the Connecticut River Valley survive, adapt, and persist in the years after King Philip’s War? OBJECTIVES Students will know: • Native peoples of the Westfield River Valley and the surrounding region experienced a diaspora in the years after King Philip’s War. • Diverse native peoples survived, persisted, crossed cultural boundaries, and adapted to changing times and circumstances in various ways. • Grey Lock and Theyanoguin followed different paths in their struggles to secure the survival of their people. • The New England frontier was a zone of cultural interaction as well as conflict. Students will: • Research the lives of Grey Lock and Theyanoguin. • Create annotated and illustrated timelines comparing and contrasting the lives of the two leaders. • Analyze and evaluate evidence in primary and secondary sources. • Determine the causes and consequences of Grey Lock’s War and other conflicts. • Write a document-based essay addressing the central question. RESOURCES Baxter, James. "Documentary History of the State of Maine." Baxter Manuscripts (1889): 209-211, 334- 337, 385-387. Internet Archive. Web. 9 Jul 2013. <http://archive.org/details/baxtermanuscript00baxtrich>. Bruchac, Margaret. “Pocumtuck: A Native Homeland.” Historic Deerfield Walking Tour. Historic Deerfield Inc., 2006. Calloway, Colin. Dawnland Encounters: Indians and Europeans in Northern New England. Hanover: University Press of New England, 1991. 84, 114, 136, 154-55, 159, 162, 207.
    [Show full text]
  • Yours to Discover Vale Perkins
    Vale Perkins Potton : Yours to discover Nestled between Owl’s Head and Elephantis, not far from the Vale Perkins shores of Lake Memphremagog, is a valley extending to Knowlton Landing. This is Vale Perkins, an area of easy terrain likely used by the Abenakis as a « carrying place » between Lake Memphremagog and the North Missisquoi River, south to Lake Champlain. It is thought that Chemin de Vale Perkins roughly follows an original native portage trail. The original settlements in Potton Township were named by geographic location. This area was then East Potton. From 1867 to 1880 it was called Herbert; however, history is silent as to the reason. In 1880, Herbert became known as Vale Perkins, named after its founding family. The Pioneers In 1793, Loyalist Nicholas Austin arrived to clear a portion of land granted to him, near what is now Perkins Landing on Lake Memphremagog. He miscalculated the location of his grant, however; and was obliged to move north. Austin settled near Gibraltar Point, on the bay now bearing his name. Fred Jersey, Gathering sap Potton Heritage Association P.O. Box 262, Mansonville, (Québec) J0E 1X0 [email protected] ww.pottonheritage.org The Wharf, circa 1920 In 1793, Peter Perkins also arrived in Potton with his family. In 1865, used as a school until 1948, and sold in 1949 to the 1795, his son Samuel followed the Abenaki trail to Austin’s United Church for use as a Church. It was closed in 1964, but original partially cleared lot on the lake. He homesteaded there re-opened in 1982, for seasonal use, and was finally closed in with his three sons.
    [Show full text]