Foreign Policy Report 2009 Report Policy Foreign 2009 Report by the Federal Minister for Report by the Federal Minister For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foreign Policy Report 2009 Report Policy Foreign 2009 Report by the Federal Minister for Report by the Federal Minister For Austria and the World European Union: Financial Crisis – Enlargement – Treaty of Lisbon – European Information Activities – EU Policies – External Relations Austria as a Member of the United Nations Security Council Neighbourhood Policy, Regional Partnership, Cooperation in the Danube Region and in the Black Sea Region, South Eastern Europe, Cooperation in the Mediterranean Region The Situation in Crisis Regions The Consular Dimension of Foreign Policy Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Human Rights, Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, Women’s Rights, Children’s Rights Intercultural and Interfaith Dialogue The Humanitarian Dimension in International Relations Austrian Development Cooperation Global Aspects of Austrian Foreign Policy, Austria in International Organisations Global Disarmament International Economic Policy and Global Sustainability Policy The Austrian Foreign Service International Cultural Policy Public Diplomacy Foreign Policy Report 2009 Report Policy Foreign 2009 Report by the Federal Minister for Report by the Federal Minister for European and International Affairs 2009 European and International Affairs Umschlag_2009.indd 1 15.12.2010 12:02:07  Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Minoritenplatz 8 A-1014 Vienna Tel: During office hours on work days between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 0 50 11 50-0 / international: +43 50 11 50-0 or: (01) 90 115-0 / int.: +43 1 90 115-0 For general information: 0800 234 888 (toll free number, cannot be dialled from outside Austria) Fax: 0 50 11 59-0 / international: +43 50 11 59-0 or: (01) 904 20 16-0 / international: +43 1 904 20 16-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmeia.gv.at Citizens’ Help Desk In case of emergency abroad the Citizens’ Help Desk can be reached 24 hours a day: Tel: 0 50 11 50-4411 / international: +43 50 11 50-4411 or: (01) 90 115-4411 / international: +43 1 90 115-4411 Fax: 0 50 11 59-4411 / international: +43 50 11 59-4411 or: 0 50 11 59-245 / international: +43 50 11 59-245 or: (01) 904 20 16-245 / international: +43 1 904 20 16-245 E-Mail: [email protected] Assistance services available to Austrian citizens abroad are detailed on the website of the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs at www.bmeia.gv.at under “Service”. Umschlag_2009.indd 2 15.12.2010 12:02:07  Foreign Policy Report 2009 Report by the Federal Minister for European and International Affairs  Proprietor and Publisher: Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs A-1014 Vienna, Minoritenplatz 8 Austria Edited and Coordinated by: Christoph Weidinger English translation by: Sabine Hübler Printed by: Manz Crossmedia GmbH & Co KG A-1051 Vienna, Stolberggasse 26 Austria The German original is available at: www.bmeia.gv.at or in printed form in the Information Management, Documentation and Knowledge Management Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Foreword In the foreign policy sphere, the year 2009 was marked by the manifold tasks and activities the Austrian Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs performs in the service of our country. Particular highlights included Austria’s proactive and successful work as a member of the United Nations Security Council, the 30th anniversary of Vienna as one of the UN head- quarters as well as Austria’s positive track record after 15 years of European Union membership. We succeeded in initiating a number of important activi- ties in regions that have traditionally been of particular concern to Austria – the Western Balkans and the Danube region. Furthermore, we successfully set course towards a region that will figure very prominently on Austria’s foreign policy agenda over the next few years – the Black Sea region with its unique potential for the future. The events marking the year 2009 have made it very clear again: Austria’s contribution to the world is both greatly respected and in high demand. Filled with self-confidence by this interna- tional recognition we may therefore continue to actively shape the European and foreign policy that will lead Austria through the 21st century. Austria’s election as a non-permanent member to the United Nations Security Council for the period 2009/2010 – the third after 1973/74 and 1991/92 – was an expression of confidence in our long-standing and broadly appreciated commitment within the United Nations. In this most important forum for international peace and security, Austria assumes responsibility as a member of the international community. Since the very beginning of its membership of the UN Security Council, Austria has made the rule of law a focus of its work. In this context, Austria has attached special priority to improving the protection of civilians in armed conflict. Indeed, our ambitious approach in this respect has born fruit. The unanimous adoption of the relevant Security Council resolution 1894 during Austria’s Presidency of the Security Council in November 2009 means that we have already achieved very tangible and encouraging progress towards reaching this objective. Among further topics that rank high on the agenda of our work within the Security Council is our active commitment to ensuring protection and respect for human rights and humanitarian international law, strengthening the role of women in peace initiatives, disarmament and non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruc- tion as well as fostering intercultural and interfaith dialogue. The importance Austrian foreign policy attaches to the United Nations was clearly demonstrated by the celebrations hosted in honour of the 30th anni- V Foreword versary of Vienna as one of the UN headquarters. The participation of United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in these festivities testified to the recognition Vienna as the host city and Austria’s long-standing work enjoy within the United Nations. Over the past 30 years, Austria has succeeded in consolidating and further strengthening its role as UN headquarters and competence centre for security issues. The tasks of the Vienna-based UN organisations and agencies, including the United Nations Industrial Devel- opment Organisation (UNIDO) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have further gained in importance. Vienna has evolved into an impor- tant lynchpin in the international security architecture, enjoying an excel- lent reputation as a venue for international dialogue. It is thus an important concern of mine to ensure that Vienna will not only retain its standing as an international hub but will further enhance and expand its role in this regard. One month before the 15th anniversary of Austria’s accession to the Euro- pean Union, the Treaty of Lisbon came into force on 1 December. This EU Reform Treaty constitutes a sound and sustainable basis for the European Union’s future work. Among the amendments brought about by the Treaty, those relating to foreign policy are of particular significance. The enhanced role of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the establishment of the European External Action Service will thus enable us to speak more frequently with one European voice on the international stage. Notwithstanding such modifications, the Union’s common policy does not strive to take the place of its Member States’ individual foreign policies but rather aims to act as a meaningful complement. Austria will continue to con- sistently pursue its distinctive foreign and European policy as well as the role it plays in the international sphere. In this context, we strongly support the accelerated approximation of the Western Balkan countries to the EU. Together with my Romanian counterpart I initiated an EU Strategy for the Danube Region at the beginning of 2009, which will enable us to work even more closely with our neighbours in this important region. In the meantime, this Austro-Romanian initiative has developed into an EU core project. Par- ticularly for us Austrians, the Danube region is a potential engine for growth, with the River Danube as our connecting link. The Danube is not only sym- bolic of Europe growing together, but is also part of our European identity. A further priority I will be adding to our active neighbourhood policy agenda is the Black Sea Region. The huge potential for the future this region has to offer Europe in terms of economic development, human resources and cul- ture must be used in a targeted manner to the benefit of all. Especially during this time of economic crisis, Austrians sense how impor- tant it is to be firmly embedded in a strong community that has the ability to take action. At the same time, a lingering feeling of scepticism towards the EU is still perceptible in Austria and criticism has been voiced about develop- ments within the EU. With this in mind, I seek to actively engage in targeted, VI Foreword direct contact and face to face discussions with as many citizens as possible. My “EU Listening and Dialogue Tour”, which took me across the Austrian federal provinces, has clearly shown that direct and honest dialogue is the most effective means of countering EU scepticism. Based on what I heard and learned during these discussions and meetings, I put together a package of measures aimed at encouraging dialogue on Europe within Austria. On Europe Day 2009, I presented this package, which will form the basis for fur- ther efforts in this area, to the Federal Government. In order to consistently maintain this momentum of dialogue on Europe in Austria, I have embarked on my current “EU Dialogue Tour” that is again taking me through the federal provinces. In 2009, Austria’s international cultural policy was dominated by events marking the historical turning point of 1989. Under the heading of “Europe 1989 – 2009. Divided – Reunited: Start into a New Europe”, we launched an initiative to illustrate the importance of this year of historic changes in shaping our European identity as well as its effects on our self-image and self-confidence as Europeans.
Recommended publications
  • Failed Democratic Experience in Kyrgyzstan: 1990-2000 a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle Ea
    FAILED DEMOCRATIC EXPERIENCE IN KYRGYZSTAN: 1990-2000 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY OURAN NIAZALIEV IN THE PARTIAL FULLFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION APRIL 2004 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences __________________________ Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for degree of Master of Science __________________________ Prof. Dr. Feride Acar Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. __________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akcalı __________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Canan Aslan __________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever __________________________ ABSTRACT FAILED DEMOCRATIC EXPERIENCE IN KYRGYZSTAN: 1990-2000 Niazaliev, Ouran M.Sc., Department of Political Science and Public Administration Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı April 2004, 158 p. This study seeks to analyze the process of transition and democratization in Kyrgyzstan from 1990 to 2000. The collapse of the Soviet Union opened new political perspectives for Kyrgyzstan and a chance to develop sovereign state based on democratic principles and values. Initially Kyrgyzstan attained some progress in building up a democratic state. However, in the second half of 1990s Kyrgyzstan shifted toward authoritarianism. Therefore, the full-scale transition to democracy has not been realized, and a well-functioning democracy has not been established.
    [Show full text]
  • China As a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies
    China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org "China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies" is a Monograph published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. Monographs provide comprehensive analyses of key issues presented by leading experts. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. This project was made possible with the support of the Smith Richardson Foundation. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Business & Politics in the Muslim World News
    Business & Politics in the Muslim World News Monitoring Weekly Report Jan 22 to Jan 28, 2010 Central Asia Uzma Siraj Table of Contents Azerbaijan Political Front…………………………………………………………………..4 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………….4 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………….4 Social Front…………………………………………………………………….4 Kazakastan. Political Front…………………………………………………………………..4 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………….5 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………….5 Social Front…………………………………………………………………….5 Kyrgyzstan Political Front………………………………………………………………….5 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………….6 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………….6 Social Front……………………………………………………………………7 Tajikistan Political Front…………………………………………………………………7 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………...7 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………...7 Social Front………………………………………………………...................7 Turkmenistan Political Front…………………………………………………………………8 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………...8 Economic /Energy Front………………………………………………………8 Social Front…………………………………………………………………....9 Uzbekistan Political Front…………………………………………………………………9 Geo Strategic Front……………………………………………………………9 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………..10 Social Front…………………………………………………………………..10 Outline Azerbaijan Political Front Geo Strategic Front • Azerbaijan's admission to Council of Europe to be marked 1 • Azerbaijan to send protest note to to Egypt's Foreign Ministry • Azerbaijani FM to attend London conference on Afghanistan Economic /Energy Front • Nabucco Will Not Be Built
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan Brief No 2
    2 № December 2005 - January 2006 Valentin Bogatyrev: TABLE OF CONTENTS Kyrgyzstan-Kazakhstan: how to build new “Today, any country is relations with an old friend incorporated into a great Kumar Bekbolotov ..........................................2 variety of connections, and building a unidirectional Topical issues of Kyrgyzstan’s foreign policy BRIEF KYRGYZSTAN policy would mean to lose Roundtable proceedings ...............................10 one’s sovereignty.” - p. 14 The dangers of property redistribution Emil Umetaliev: Kumar Bekbolotov, Shairbek Juraev .............17 “Unprotected business Guest of the issue: Emil Umetaliev .........................................21 does not have confi dence in further development, and Constitutional changes: issues and is set to withdraw capital preconditions from the country.” - p. 22 Roundtable proceedings ...............................25 Civil service today: problems and solutions Esenbek Urmanov .......................................39 ABOUT IPP The Institute for Public Policy (IPP) is an independent, non-partisan research and policy-making institution, based in Bishkek. Its goals are to develop and promote participatory approach in establishing public policy; to strengthen expert analysis in order to promote effective decision-mak- ing in matters of public policy and to create an independent platform for dialogue on public policy issues. The Institute provides expert consulting, research and surveys on Central Asian affairs, confl ict management serv- ices as well as implementation of educational
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Report 2010 the State of the World’S Human Rights
    AMNesty INterNAtIoNAl rePort 2010 the stAte of the world’s huMAN rIghts coMPlete rePort This document was downloaded from thereport.amnesty.org/en/download Please visit thereport.amnesty.org for the complete website and other downloads. Support Amnesty International’s work, buy your copy of the Report or other publications at shop.amnesty.org Amnesty International Report 2010 Amnesty International Report © Amnesty International 2010 Index: POL 10/001/2010 ISBN: 978-0-86210-455-9 ISSN: 0309-068X This report covers the period January to December 2009.10 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 2010 RIGHTS HUMAN WORLD’S THE OF STATE THE 2010 REPORT INTERNATIONAL AMNESTY THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S HUMAN RIGHTS In a troubled and divided world, Amnesty International reveals truth, bears witness and campaigns for change. For every human rights abuse Amnesty International exposes, it demands accountability. In 2009 this led our members and supporters to push for robust international and national laws and to insist that these laws must be used to bring about real justice. The Amnesty International Report 2010 documents the state of human rights in 159 countries in 2009. It details a year in which accountability seemed a remote ideal for many, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 2010 as people’s lives continued to be torn apart by repression, violence, discrimination, power plays and political THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S HUMAN RIGHTS stalemates. But the report also celebrates real progress. It reveals how it is harder now for perpetrators of the worst crimes to secure impunity. It argues that the demand for accountability is not confined to redress for killings or torture, but extends to the denial of all the rights that we need to live our lives in dignity.
    [Show full text]
  • OSW Commentary 7[38]
    OswcOMMentary issue 38 | 27.07.2010 | ceNTRe fOR eAsTeRN sTudies Russia’s position on the events in Kyrgyzstan (April – June 2010) NTARy Me Wojciech Górecki ces cOM Russia was the first state in the world to de facto recognise the regime change in Kyrgyzstan that took place on 7 April 2010. This recogni- tion, along with a previous campaign by the Russian media against the tudies then President Kurmanbek Bakiyev, has given rise to suspicion that s the events of April were provoked by Russia. However, it seems no more than reasonable to say that Russia provided some inspiration and astern lobbying in that direction. Russia offered support to the new Kyrgyz e government almost immediately, albeit conditionally. Russia’s relations with Roza Otunbayeva’s government have been changing in nature; they are currently much cooler than they had been immediately after the entre for coup. There are many indications that this change was a reaction to the c extension of the lease agreement for the American military base in the Manas airport. At the same time, Moscow remains in contact with the political rivals to the current regime, which suggests that the Kremlin is NTARy preparing for different developments, and does not regard the current Me crisis as having been fully resolved. Despite the interim government’s plea for help, Russia refused to un- ces cOM dertake military intervention in southern Kyrgyzstan, which plunged into ethnic unrest in June. This shows that Russia is wary of being dragged into a long-standing and bloody conflict in the region, which tudies could entail considerable expenses and jeopardise Russia’s authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Content,Kyrgyzstan Issue Journal.P65
    ISSN 0971-9318 HIMALAYAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES (JOURNAL OF HIMALAYAN RESEARCH AND CULTURAL FOUNDATION) NGO in Special Consultative Status with ECOSOC, United Nations Vol. 16 No. 1 January-March 2012 Kyrgyzstan Special Monuments of the Bronze Age of Kyrgyzstan Tabaldyev Kubatbek Common Traits in the Culture of Kyrgyz and Indian Peoples Abykeyeva-Sultanalieva Talaigul Bakaevna and Indira Musaeva Manas and Mahabharata: Genetic community and Differences of two Epics Sheriev Abdygany, Ypysheva Nurgul and Toitukova Chinara Buddhist Pilgrim Suan Czyan and the Flooded Monuments of Issyk-Kul Vasilii V. Ploskikh Historiographic Study of the Russian Conquest of Central Asia Alymbaev B. Jeenbek India-Kyrgyzstan Relations in Contemporary Times K. Warikoo Crisis in Kyrgyzstan of 2010 Murat Laumulin The process of democratization in the Republic of Kyrgyzstan Arad Davar and Sabina Chukaeva HIMALAYAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES Editor : K. WARIKOO © Himalayan Research and Cultural Foundation, New Delhi. * All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without first seeking the written permission of the publisher or due acknowledgement. * The views expressed in this Journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Himalayan Research and Cultural Foundation. SUBSCRIPTION IN INDIA Single Copy (Individual) : Rs. 500.00 Annual (Individual) : Rs. 1000.00 Institutions : Rs. 1400.00 & Libraries
    [Show full text]
  • Menga F., 2012
    Università degli Studi di Cagliari DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN STORIA, ISTITUZIONI E RELAZIONI INTERNAZIONALI DELL’ASIA E DELL’AFRICA MODERNA E CONTEMPORANEA XXVI Ciclo Power and Dams in Central Asia Settore scientifico disciplinare di afferenza SPS/14 Presentata da: Dott. Filippo Menga Coordinatore Dottorato: Prof.ssa Bianca Maria Carcangiu Tutor/Relatore Prof.ssa Annamaria Baldussi Esame finale anno accademico 2012 – 2013 Abstract The purpose of this research is to analyse and understand the role of state power in transboundary water relations, providing an in–depth analysis of the evolution of interstate relations in Central Asia in the field of water in the period 1991-2011. Taking as a case study the planned construction of the Rogun and Kambarata dams in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, the research looks at the various forms of overt and covert power shaping interstate relations and at the way hegemonic and counter-hegemonic measures are put in place in an international river basin. The overarching hypothesis driving this study is that the intimate correlation between the concepts of power and hegemony can offer key insights to the analysis and understanding of transboundary water relations. While, on the one hand, the analytical focus is placed on state power, on the other hand, hegemonic and counter-hegemonic tactics represent the ways in which power is wielded and observed. This research makes an original contribution to the literature on hydropolitics in Central Asia, offering fresh theoretical interpretations to the subjects of power and counter- hegemony in the Aral Sea basin and presenting the original “circle of hydro-hegemony”, an analytical framework in which the various forms of power are “connective” in the function of hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • New Media in New Democracies: Perceptions of Good Governance
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 New media in new democracies: perceptions of good governance among traditional and Internet- based media users in Kyrgyzstan Svetlana Viktorovna Kulikova Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Kulikova, Svetlana Viktorovna, "New media in new democracies: perceptions of good governance among traditional and Internet- based media users in Kyrgyzstan" (2008). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1578. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1578 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. NEW MEDIA IN NEW DEMOCRACIES: PERCEPTIONS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE AMONG TRADITIONAL AND INTERNET-BASED MEDIA USERS IN KYRGYZSTAN A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Manship School of Mass Communication by Svetlana V. Kulikova Diploma,
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Kyrgyzstan (Historical Dictionaries of Asia
    History ASIA ABAZOV ASIAN/OCEANIAN HISTORICAL DICTIONARIES, NO. 49 he modern history of Kyrgyzstan resembles the “great game” played by the British and Russian empires for domination in central Asia. For centuries, the land populated by Kyrgyzs was T Dictionary Historical fragmented among various political entities, and at the end of the 19th century the Russian empire acquired control of the region. In 1991 Kyrgyzstan declared its independence and began building a democratic and market-oriented state, but the newly independent country soon found itself the subject of a political competition for influence among of KYRGYZSTAN powers such as China, Russia, and the United States. This competition resulted in the establishment of U.S. and Russian military airbases in Kyrgyzstan’s territory, in what some analysts describe as a new round of the great game. The Historical Dictionary of Kyrgyzstan is the first comprehensive refer- ence book on this pivotal country, providing superb up-to-date details about the key players and issues in contemporary domestic and interna- tional politics. The dictionary consists of approximately 300 entries and is cross-referenced for ease of use by both experienced scholars and young students interested in the complicated and captivating history of Kyrgyzs and the Kyrgyz land. The substantial bibliography will assist readers in finding materials and resources in specialized subject areas. Rafis Abazov is a visiting scholar at the Harriman Institute at Columbia University, New York. He is the author of two books and numerous arti- cles in Kazakhstani, Russian, and other international academic journals. He has contributed articles to the Encyclopaedia of Modern Asia and the Encyclopaedia of National Economies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consequences of Cracking Down in Kyrgyzstan
    Nationalities Papers (2019), 47: 4, 628–646 doi:10.1017/nps.2018.37 ARTICLE Misruling the Masses: The Consequences of Cracking Down in Kyrgyzstan Charles Sullivan* Department of Political Science and International Relations, Nazarbaev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract Can nondemocratic leaders initiate a crackdown against mass protesters and suffer little in the way of political-reputational costs? In conceptualizing a “crackdown” as a government-orchestrated violent restriction of civil society involving the killing of civilians, this article analyzes how the use of force is perceived by ordinary citizens when their government represses a portion of the populace. In analyzing the findings of a 2016 survey that gauges contemporary attitudes toward the overthrow of presidents Askar Akaev (in 2005) and Kurmanbek Bakiev (in 2010), this article argues that Kyrgyzstanis evaluate the Bakiev administration more negatively than they do the Akaev administration because of the former’sresortto forceful measures in attempting to quell mass protesters in April 2010. Such findings imply that nondemocratic leaders who employ force against mass protesters incur significant political-reputational costs, irrespective as to whether the wider public views the mass protests as legitimate or not. Keywords: Kyrgyzstan; mass protests; Central Asia; authoritarianism; legitimacy Introduction All nondemocratic leaders utilize coercion to some extent to maintain political order. Yet can such leaders
    [Show full text]
  • China As a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies
    China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org "China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies" is a Monograph published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. Monographs provide comprehensive analyses of key issues presented by leading experts. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. This project was made possible with the support of the Smith Richardson Foundation. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program.
    [Show full text]