China As a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

China As a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org "China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies" is a Monograph published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. Monographs provide comprehensive analyses of key issues presented by leading experts. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. This project was made possible with the support of the Smith Richardson Foundation. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, 2009 ISBN: 978-91-85937-56-1 Printed in Singapore Distributed in North America by: The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel. +1-202-663-7723; Fax. +1-202-663-7785 E-mail: [email protected] Distributed in Europe by: The Silk Road Studies Program Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Email: [email protected] Editorial correspondence should be addressed to Svante E. Cornell, Research and Publications Director, at either of the addresses above. (preferably by email) Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 7 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 9 Soviet Legacy, Russian Influence, and the “Chinese Question” in Central Asia ..................................................................................................................... 9 Central Asian Strategies and Perspectives on the “Chinese Question” ..... 14 I. Russo-Chinese Cooperation/Competition in Central Asia ......................... 18 The Differing Historical Legacies of Russia and China in Central Asia ... 19 Russia: Advantages and Disadvantages of Post-Soviet Continuities ............... 20 China: Developing Good Neighborly Relations and Settling Border Disputes . 24 Russia and China: Sharing of Geopolitical Influence in Central Asia ....... 26 Common Political Objectives ........................................................................... 27 Russia: the Primary Strategic and Military Partner ....................................... 30 Is the SCO an Instrument of Chinese Interests or an Impediment to them? ..... 34 Russia/China: Economic Competition or Collaboration? ........................... 39 Russia/Central Asia and China/Central Asia: Comparable Commercial Flows? ............................................................................................................. 39 Energy Resources – the Primary Stake of Russia’s and China’s Presence in Central Asia ................................................................................................... 41 Hydroelectricity, Minerals and Transport Infrastructures .............................. 47 Are the Russian and Chinese Migration Flows in Central Asia Complementary? .............................................................................................. 52 Central Asia and its Re-entry into Russia’s Orbit via Migration .................... 53 Central Asia’s Concern over Chinese Migration Flows ................................... 56 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 60 II. Political Debate and Expertise on China in Central Asia .......................... 63 China as Political Object: the Chinese Question in Central Asian Political Life ..................................................................................................................... 63 Are there any pro-Chinese Economic and Political Lobbies? ............................ 66 Political Tensions in Kazakhstan over the “Chinese Question” ....................... 72 Political Tensions in Kyrgyzstan over the “Chinese Question” ....................... 81 China as an Object of Scientific Inquiry: the Development of Sinology in Central Asian Expert Milieus ......................................................................... 91 The Difficulties of Launching Sinology in Academia....................................... 92 Public Research: The Institutes for Strategic Studies ..................................... 102 The Small Sector of Private Expertise ........................................................... 106 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 111 III. Sinophilia/Sinophobia: A Double Narrative ........................................... 114 The Ambiguities of the Strategic and Geopolitical Partnership ................ 115 China: A Credible Partner in Matters of Security? .........................................115 The SCO – A Balancing Act for or against Central Asia’s Interests? .......... 120 The Economic Issue: Paradoxical Facets ...................................................... 130 A Promising Energy Partnership? ................................................................... 131 An Opportunity for Opening Up and for Development .................................. 133 The Restriction of Central Asian Economies to Primary Resources ................ 137 An Image Problem: China’s Products, Traders, and Companies ..................... 142 The Legacy of History and the Weight of Cultural Apprehensions ......... 145 The Thorny Border Question: Resolution or Stalemate? ................................ 146 Is China a Threat? Political Pressure and the Uyghur Question .................... 150 China as Empire: A Culturally Entrenched Suspicion .................................... 155 The Stakes of Migration: the Recurrent Topic of the “Yellow Peril” ............. 159 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 167 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 170 Central Asian Views of the Competition/Collaboration between Moscow and Beijing ............................................................................................................ 170 Differencing Viewpoints between Central Asian States ................................. 173 On Sinophobe and Sinophile Lobbies .............................................................. 176 The Viewpoints of Central Asian Think Tanks ............................................. 178 Generational Differences: The Youth’s View of China ................................. 180 What are the Policy Implications of this Analysis? ........................................ 182 Bibliography ...................................................................................................... 186 About the Authors ........................................................................................... 200 Executive Summary Since 2000, China has gained significantly in importance in Central Asia and is now in a position to pose a threat to traditional Russian domination in the region. Exactly how China will intensify its presence in Central Asia and how this alliance/competition with Russia will play itself out is going to depend partly on the approaches and attitudes of the Central Asian states themselves. For this reason, it is essential to comprehend not only Chinese and Russian objectives in the region, but also to look at the indigenous viewpoints of Central Asian governments, their visions of the world, and their room for initiative on political and geopolitical issues. Existing publications on the topic of China-Central Asian relations are generally limited to discussing energy issues (collaboration on hydrocarbons) and security questions (the collective management of terrorist threats), and for the most part only present Russian and Chinese viewpoints. The objective of this Silk Road Monograph is to go beyond this first level of analysis by giving a voice to those most concerned by these issues, namely the Central Asians, paying special attention to their views of the “Chinese question”. Studying domestic
Recommended publications
  • Failed Democratic Experience in Kyrgyzstan: 1990-2000 a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle Ea
    FAILED DEMOCRATIC EXPERIENCE IN KYRGYZSTAN: 1990-2000 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY OURAN NIAZALIEV IN THE PARTIAL FULLFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION APRIL 2004 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences __________________________ Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for degree of Master of Science __________________________ Prof. Dr. Feride Acar Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. __________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akcalı __________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Canan Aslan __________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Oktay F. Tanrısever __________________________ ABSTRACT FAILED DEMOCRATIC EXPERIENCE IN KYRGYZSTAN: 1990-2000 Niazaliev, Ouran M.Sc., Department of Political Science and Public Administration Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pınar Akçalı April 2004, 158 p. This study seeks to analyze the process of transition and democratization in Kyrgyzstan from 1990 to 2000. The collapse of the Soviet Union opened new political perspectives for Kyrgyzstan and a chance to develop sovereign state based on democratic principles and values. Initially Kyrgyzstan attained some progress in building up a democratic state. However, in the second half of 1990s Kyrgyzstan shifted toward authoritarianism. Therefore, the full-scale transition to democracy has not been realized, and a well-functioning democracy has not been established.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Business & Politics in the Muslim World News
    Business & Politics in the Muslim World News Monitoring Weekly Report Jan 22 to Jan 28, 2010 Central Asia Uzma Siraj Table of Contents Azerbaijan Political Front…………………………………………………………………..4 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………….4 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………….4 Social Front…………………………………………………………………….4 Kazakastan. Political Front…………………………………………………………………..4 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………….5 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………….5 Social Front…………………………………………………………………….5 Kyrgyzstan Political Front………………………………………………………………….5 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………….6 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………….6 Social Front……………………………………………………………………7 Tajikistan Political Front…………………………………………………………………7 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………...7 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………...7 Social Front………………………………………………………...................7 Turkmenistan Political Front…………………………………………………………………8 Geo Strategic Front…………………………………………………………...8 Economic /Energy Front………………………………………………………8 Social Front…………………………………………………………………....9 Uzbekistan Political Front…………………………………………………………………9 Geo Strategic Front……………………………………………………………9 Economic /Energy Front……………………………………………………..10 Social Front…………………………………………………………………..10 Outline Azerbaijan Political Front Geo Strategic Front • Azerbaijan's admission to Council of Europe to be marked 1 • Azerbaijan to send protest note to to Egypt's Foreign Ministry • Azerbaijani FM to attend London conference on Afghanistan Economic /Energy Front • Nabucco Will Not Be Built
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan Brief No 2
    2 № December 2005 - January 2006 Valentin Bogatyrev: TABLE OF CONTENTS Kyrgyzstan-Kazakhstan: how to build new “Today, any country is relations with an old friend incorporated into a great Kumar Bekbolotov ..........................................2 variety of connections, and building a unidirectional Topical issues of Kyrgyzstan’s foreign policy BRIEF KYRGYZSTAN policy would mean to lose Roundtable proceedings ...............................10 one’s sovereignty.” - p. 14 The dangers of property redistribution Emil Umetaliev: Kumar Bekbolotov, Shairbek Juraev .............17 “Unprotected business Guest of the issue: Emil Umetaliev .........................................21 does not have confi dence in further development, and Constitutional changes: issues and is set to withdraw capital preconditions from the country.” - p. 22 Roundtable proceedings ...............................25 Civil service today: problems and solutions Esenbek Urmanov .......................................39 ABOUT IPP The Institute for Public Policy (IPP) is an independent, non-partisan research and policy-making institution, based in Bishkek. Its goals are to develop and promote participatory approach in establishing public policy; to strengthen expert analysis in order to promote effective decision-mak- ing in matters of public policy and to create an independent platform for dialogue on public policy issues. The Institute provides expert consulting, research and surveys on Central Asian affairs, confl ict management serv- ices as well as implementation of educational
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Report 2010 the State of the World’S Human Rights
    AMNesty INterNAtIoNAl rePort 2010 the stAte of the world’s huMAN rIghts coMPlete rePort This document was downloaded from thereport.amnesty.org/en/download Please visit thereport.amnesty.org for the complete website and other downloads. Support Amnesty International’s work, buy your copy of the Report or other publications at shop.amnesty.org Amnesty International Report 2010 Amnesty International Report © Amnesty International 2010 Index: POL 10/001/2010 ISBN: 978-0-86210-455-9 ISSN: 0309-068X This report covers the period January to December 2009.10 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 2010 RIGHTS HUMAN WORLD’S THE OF STATE THE 2010 REPORT INTERNATIONAL AMNESTY THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S HUMAN RIGHTS In a troubled and divided world, Amnesty International reveals truth, bears witness and campaigns for change. For every human rights abuse Amnesty International exposes, it demands accountability. In 2009 this led our members and supporters to push for robust international and national laws and to insist that these laws must be used to bring about real justice. The Amnesty International Report 2010 documents the state of human rights in 159 countries in 2009. It details a year in which accountability seemed a remote ideal for many, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT 2010 as people’s lives continued to be torn apart by repression, violence, discrimination, power plays and political THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S HUMAN RIGHTS stalemates. But the report also celebrates real progress. It reveals how it is harder now for perpetrators of the worst crimes to secure impunity. It argues that the demand for accountability is not confined to redress for killings or torture, but extends to the denial of all the rights that we need to live our lives in dignity.
    [Show full text]
  • OSW Commentary 7[38]
    OswcOMMentary issue 38 | 27.07.2010 | ceNTRe fOR eAsTeRN sTudies Russia’s position on the events in Kyrgyzstan (April – June 2010) NTARy Me Wojciech Górecki ces cOM Russia was the first state in the world to de facto recognise the regime change in Kyrgyzstan that took place on 7 April 2010. This recogni- tion, along with a previous campaign by the Russian media against the tudies then President Kurmanbek Bakiyev, has given rise to suspicion that s the events of April were provoked by Russia. However, it seems no more than reasonable to say that Russia provided some inspiration and astern lobbying in that direction. Russia offered support to the new Kyrgyz e government almost immediately, albeit conditionally. Russia’s relations with Roza Otunbayeva’s government have been changing in nature; they are currently much cooler than they had been immediately after the entre for coup. There are many indications that this change was a reaction to the c extension of the lease agreement for the American military base in the Manas airport. At the same time, Moscow remains in contact with the political rivals to the current regime, which suggests that the Kremlin is NTARy preparing for different developments, and does not regard the current Me crisis as having been fully resolved. Despite the interim government’s plea for help, Russia refused to un- ces cOM dertake military intervention in southern Kyrgyzstan, which plunged into ethnic unrest in June. This shows that Russia is wary of being dragged into a long-standing and bloody conflict in the region, which tudies could entail considerable expenses and jeopardise Russia’s authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Content,Kyrgyzstan Issue Journal.P65
    ISSN 0971-9318 HIMALAYAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES (JOURNAL OF HIMALAYAN RESEARCH AND CULTURAL FOUNDATION) NGO in Special Consultative Status with ECOSOC, United Nations Vol. 16 No. 1 January-March 2012 Kyrgyzstan Special Monuments of the Bronze Age of Kyrgyzstan Tabaldyev Kubatbek Common Traits in the Culture of Kyrgyz and Indian Peoples Abykeyeva-Sultanalieva Talaigul Bakaevna and Indira Musaeva Manas and Mahabharata: Genetic community and Differences of two Epics Sheriev Abdygany, Ypysheva Nurgul and Toitukova Chinara Buddhist Pilgrim Suan Czyan and the Flooded Monuments of Issyk-Kul Vasilii V. Ploskikh Historiographic Study of the Russian Conquest of Central Asia Alymbaev B. Jeenbek India-Kyrgyzstan Relations in Contemporary Times K. Warikoo Crisis in Kyrgyzstan of 2010 Murat Laumulin The process of democratization in the Republic of Kyrgyzstan Arad Davar and Sabina Chukaeva HIMALAYAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES Editor : K. WARIKOO © Himalayan Research and Cultural Foundation, New Delhi. * All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without first seeking the written permission of the publisher or due acknowledgement. * The views expressed in this Journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Himalayan Research and Cultural Foundation. SUBSCRIPTION IN INDIA Single Copy (Individual) : Rs. 500.00 Annual (Individual) : Rs. 1000.00 Institutions : Rs. 1400.00 & Libraries
    [Show full text]
  • Menga F., 2012
    Università degli Studi di Cagliari DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN STORIA, ISTITUZIONI E RELAZIONI INTERNAZIONALI DELL’ASIA E DELL’AFRICA MODERNA E CONTEMPORANEA XXVI Ciclo Power and Dams in Central Asia Settore scientifico disciplinare di afferenza SPS/14 Presentata da: Dott. Filippo Menga Coordinatore Dottorato: Prof.ssa Bianca Maria Carcangiu Tutor/Relatore Prof.ssa Annamaria Baldussi Esame finale anno accademico 2012 – 2013 Abstract The purpose of this research is to analyse and understand the role of state power in transboundary water relations, providing an in–depth analysis of the evolution of interstate relations in Central Asia in the field of water in the period 1991-2011. Taking as a case study the planned construction of the Rogun and Kambarata dams in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, the research looks at the various forms of overt and covert power shaping interstate relations and at the way hegemonic and counter-hegemonic measures are put in place in an international river basin. The overarching hypothesis driving this study is that the intimate correlation between the concepts of power and hegemony can offer key insights to the analysis and understanding of transboundary water relations. While, on the one hand, the analytical focus is placed on state power, on the other hand, hegemonic and counter-hegemonic tactics represent the ways in which power is wielded and observed. This research makes an original contribution to the literature on hydropolitics in Central Asia, offering fresh theoretical interpretations to the subjects of power and counter- hegemony in the Aral Sea basin and presenting the original “circle of hydro-hegemony”, an analytical framework in which the various forms of power are “connective” in the function of hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Report 2009 Report Policy Foreign 2009 Report by the Federal Minister for Report by the Federal Minister For
    Austria and the World European Union: Financial Crisis – Enlargement – Treaty of Lisbon – European Information Activities – EU Policies – External Relations Austria as a Member of the United Nations Security Council Neighbourhood Policy, Regional Partnership, Cooperation in the Danube Region and in the Black Sea Region, South Eastern Europe, Cooperation in the Mediterranean Region The Situation in Crisis Regions The Consular Dimension of Foreign Policy Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Human Rights, Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, Women’s Rights, Children’s Rights Intercultural and Interfaith Dialogue The Humanitarian Dimension in International Relations Austrian Development Cooperation Global Aspects of Austrian Foreign Policy, Austria in International Organisations Global Disarmament International Economic Policy and Global Sustainability Policy The Austrian Foreign Service International Cultural Policy Public Diplomacy Foreign Policy Report 2009 Report Policy Foreign 2009 Report by the Federal Minister for Report by the Federal Minister for European and International Affairs 2009 European and International Affairs Umschlag_2009.indd 1 15.12.2010 12:02:07  Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Minoritenplatz 8 A-1014 Vienna Tel: During office hours on work days between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 0 50 11 50-0 / international: +43 50 11 50-0 or: (01) 90 115-0 / int.: +43 1 90 115-0 For general information: 0800 234 888 (toll free number, cannot be dialled from outside Austria) Fax: 0 50 11 59-0 / international:
    [Show full text]
  • New Media in New Democracies: Perceptions of Good Governance
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 New media in new democracies: perceptions of good governance among traditional and Internet- based media users in Kyrgyzstan Svetlana Viktorovna Kulikova Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Kulikova, Svetlana Viktorovna, "New media in new democracies: perceptions of good governance among traditional and Internet- based media users in Kyrgyzstan" (2008). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1578. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1578 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. NEW MEDIA IN NEW DEMOCRACIES: PERCEPTIONS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE AMONG TRADITIONAL AND INTERNET-BASED MEDIA USERS IN KYRGYZSTAN A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Manship School of Mass Communication by Svetlana V. Kulikova Diploma,
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Kyrgyzstan (Historical Dictionaries of Asia
    History ASIA ABAZOV ASIAN/OCEANIAN HISTORICAL DICTIONARIES, NO. 49 he modern history of Kyrgyzstan resembles the “great game” played by the British and Russian empires for domination in central Asia. For centuries, the land populated by Kyrgyzs was T Dictionary Historical fragmented among various political entities, and at the end of the 19th century the Russian empire acquired control of the region. In 1991 Kyrgyzstan declared its independence and began building a democratic and market-oriented state, but the newly independent country soon found itself the subject of a political competition for influence among of KYRGYZSTAN powers such as China, Russia, and the United States. This competition resulted in the establishment of U.S. and Russian military airbases in Kyrgyzstan’s territory, in what some analysts describe as a new round of the great game. The Historical Dictionary of Kyrgyzstan is the first comprehensive refer- ence book on this pivotal country, providing superb up-to-date details about the key players and issues in contemporary domestic and interna- tional politics. The dictionary consists of approximately 300 entries and is cross-referenced for ease of use by both experienced scholars and young students interested in the complicated and captivating history of Kyrgyzs and the Kyrgyz land. The substantial bibliography will assist readers in finding materials and resources in specialized subject areas. Rafis Abazov is a visiting scholar at the Harriman Institute at Columbia University, New York. He is the author of two books and numerous arti- cles in Kazakhstani, Russian, and other international academic journals. He has contributed articles to the Encyclopaedia of Modern Asia and the Encyclopaedia of National Economies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consequences of Cracking Down in Kyrgyzstan
    Nationalities Papers (2019), 47: 4, 628–646 doi:10.1017/nps.2018.37 ARTICLE Misruling the Masses: The Consequences of Cracking Down in Kyrgyzstan Charles Sullivan* Department of Political Science and International Relations, Nazarbaev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract Can nondemocratic leaders initiate a crackdown against mass protesters and suffer little in the way of political-reputational costs? In conceptualizing a “crackdown” as a government-orchestrated violent restriction of civil society involving the killing of civilians, this article analyzes how the use of force is perceived by ordinary citizens when their government represses a portion of the populace. In analyzing the findings of a 2016 survey that gauges contemporary attitudes toward the overthrow of presidents Askar Akaev (in 2005) and Kurmanbek Bakiev (in 2010), this article argues that Kyrgyzstanis evaluate the Bakiev administration more negatively than they do the Akaev administration because of the former’sresortto forceful measures in attempting to quell mass protesters in April 2010. Such findings imply that nondemocratic leaders who employ force against mass protesters incur significant political-reputational costs, irrespective as to whether the wider public views the mass protests as legitimate or not. Keywords: Kyrgyzstan; mass protests; Central Asia; authoritarianism; legitimacy Introduction All nondemocratic leaders utilize coercion to some extent to maintain political order. Yet can such leaders
    [Show full text]
  • China As a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies
    China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies Marlène Laruelle Sébastien Peyrouse © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org "China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies" is a Monograph published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. Monographs provide comprehensive analyses of key issues presented by leading experts. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. This project was made possible with the support of the Smith Richardson Foundation. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program.
    [Show full text]