DOCSLIB.ORG

EU Integration and Party Politics in the Balkans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU Integration and Party Politics in the Balkans EU integration and party politics in the Balkans EPC ISSUE PAPER NO. 77 SEPTEMBER 2 0 1 4 Edited by Corina Stratulat EUROPEAN POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONS ISSN 1782-494X PROGRAMME The EPC’s Programme on European Politics and Institutions With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the new focus of this programme is on adapting the EU’s institutional architecture to take account of the changed set-up and on bringing the EU closer to its citizens. Continuing discussion on governance and policymaking in Brussels is essential to ensure that the European project can move forward and respond to the challenges facing the Union in the 21st century in a democratic and effective manner. This debate is closely linked to the key questions of how to involve European citizens in the discussions over its future; how to win their support for European integration and what are the prospects for, and consequences of, further enlargement towards the Balkans and Turkey. This programme focuses on these core themes and brings together all the strands of the debate on a number of key issues, addressing them through various fora, task forces and projects. It also works with other programmes on cross-cutting issues such as the reform of European economic governance or the new EU foreign policy structures. ii Table of Contents About the authors .................................................................................................................................... v List of tables .......................................................................................................................................... vii Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. ix Executive summary ................................................................................................................................ xi Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ xiii 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 by Corina Stratulat 2. Croatia's party system - From Tuđmanism to EU membership .............................. 13 by Andrew Konitzer 3. European integration and party politics in Montenegro .......................................... 31 by Marko Sošić and Jovana Marović 4. The European question in Serbia's party politics ................................................... 47 by Igor Bandović and Marko Vujačić 5. The EU in Macedonian party politics - Consolidating and dividing ........................ 69 by Simonida Kacarska 6. Albanian political parties, inter-party relations and the EU ..................................... 83 by Odeta Barbullushi 7. The limits of the EU’s transformative power in Bosnia-Herzegovina – Implications for party politics ..................................................................................................... 95 by Bodo Weber 8. Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 107 by Corina Stratulat iii iv About the authors Igor BANDOVIĆ is Senior Programme Manager for the European Fund for the Balkans (EFB) where he has been working since 2008. He is in charge of the Think and Link capacity-building programme for the emerging think tanks in the Balkan region, as well as the supporting policy-development initiatives and projects within the EFB. He coordinated the Gallup Balkan Monitor, a regional public opinion survey which was conducted through partnership with Gallup Europe (2009-2011). Before joining EFB, he worked for the UNDP Serbia team. From 2002 to 2006, he worked for the Belgrade Centre for Human Rights. He has researched and published on many topics, including the role of civil society and human and minority rights in Serbia and the Balkans. Odeta BARBULLUSHI is full time Lecturer of International relations and Vice-Rector for Research and Methodology at the European University of Tirana, and Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Roehampton, London. She received her PhD from the University of Birmingham, Centre for Russian and East European Studies. Her research interests include nationalism and state formation in Southeast Europe, the role of the EU and other external actors in the Balkans, critical security studies and post-structuralism in International Relations. Simonida KACARSKA is a research coordinator at the European Policy Institute in Skopje, Macedonia. She holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Leeds in the UK. She was a research fellow at the Central European University, University of Oxford and the University of Edinburgh project The Europeanisation of Citizenship in the Successor States of the Former Yugoslavia. She has both practitioner and research experience related to the political transformation and European integration of the Balkans. She has published in a number of international academic journals and is the author of a several working and policy papers. Andrew KONITZER (PhD, Political Science, University of Pittsburgh) is Associate Director of the Center for Russian and East European Studies and Adjunct Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pittsburgh. He specialises in electoral institutions, party politics, voting behaviour, European Union enlargement and issues of democratic decentralisation in the Balkans and the Former Soviet Union. His publications include the book Voting for Russia's Governors: Regional Elections and Accountability under Yeltsin and Putin (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006) and articles in journals such as Europe-Asia Studies, East European Politics and Societies, Electoral Studies, Post-Soviet Affairs and Publius: The Journal of Federalism. Jovana MAROVIĆ has been working since 2008 as Researcher coordinator for Institute Alternative, a Podgorica-based think tank. Previously, she has also been a counselor for European integration in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Municipality of Budva. She holds a PhD from the Faculty of Political Sciences in Belgrade and has successfully completed several specialised diplomatic programmes, including the Diplomatic Academy. Since March 2012 she is a member of the working group for Chapter 23-Judiciary and fundamental rights, in the processes of Montenegro’s EU accession negotiations. Marko SOŠIĆ is Researcher at Institute Alternative, a Podgorica-based think tank. His primary areas of interest include the control function of the parliament and integrity of public finance. He has authored numerous policy papers on these and other topics. In 2013, he was appointed by the government as member of the working group for the preparation of Montenegro’s accession negotiations on Chapter 32-Financial control. v Corina STRATULAT is Senior Policy Analyst at the European Policy Centre where she works on issues related to EU enlargement to the Balkans and EU institutional developments. Her research interests include comparative Central and East European politics, elections, democracy, EU institutions, integration and enlargement policy. She holds a Bachelor of Arts (BA) in Integrated Social Sciences from Jacobs University (Bremen, Germany), a Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in Contemporary European Studies from Cambridge University (Cambridge, UK) and a Doctorate (PhD) in Political and Social Sciences from European University Institute (Florence, Italy). Marko VUJAČIĆ is Senior Researcher at the European Research Academy Belgrade (EURAK). He is a PhD candidate at the Karl-Franzens University of Graz-Faculty of Law, in the Joint PhD Programme of Diversity Management and Governance, with a research focus on federalism. He holds a degree in International Affairs from University of Belgrade (Serbia), a Master of Arts in Human Rights from the Central European University (Hungary) and a Master in European Studies from the University of Bonn (Germany). He is member of the Federal Committee of the Union of European Federalists (UEF) and, since 2009, the President of the Serbian UEF branch. Bodo WEBER is Senior Associate of the Democratization Policy Council (DPC) concentrating on the Balkans region. He is a longtime analyst of international policy, Balkans politics and society, German foreign policy. He has worked as editor of the journal Perspektiven (Frankfurt/Main) and as board member of the Bosnien-Büro Frankfurt. He has published extensively on politics in the Balkans, post- conflict peacebuilding, democratisation and German foreign policy, and is a regular commentator on these topics in the main Southeast European media. He holds a MA in political science and Eastern European history from the Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University in Frankfurt/Main. vi List of tables 2.1 Key dates in Croatia’s integration effort 17 2.2 Post-2000 coalition governments in Croatia 18 2.3 Support for Croatia’s accession to the EU (2000-2011) 22 3.1 The Montenegrin governments since 1991 32 3.2 Voter turnout in Montenegrin elections since the 1990s 33 3.3 Composition of current Montenegrin parliament 34 3.4 Public support for EU integration in Montenegro 36 3.5 Public trust in political parties in Montenegro (2009-2013) 42 4.1 Serbia’s milestones on the EU path 50 4.2 Presidents, Prime Ministers and coalition governments in Serbia 51 4.3 Public support for Serbia’s membership in the European Union 62 5.1 Governing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom in the World - Serbia (2010)
    Page 1 of 5 Print Freedom in the World - Serbia (2010) Political Rights Score: 2 * Capital: Belgrade Civil Liberties Score: 2 * Status: Free Population: 7,322,000 Explanatory Note The ratings through 2002 are for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, of which Serbia was a part, and those from 2003 through 2005 are for the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. Kosovo is examined in a separate report. Ratings Change Serbia’s political rights rating improved from 3 to 2 due to the consolidation of a stable multiparty system after several rounds of elections in the post-Milosevic period. Overview The parliament in November approved a new statute regulating the autonomy of the northern province of Vojvodina, ending a long political debate over the issue and demonstrating the effectiveness of the Democratic Party–led government elected in 2008. The country also made progress in its relations with the European Union, securing visa-free travel rights and the implementation of a trade agreement in December. However, press freedom groups criticized a media law adopted in August, and tensions involving the ethnic Albanian population in the Presevo Valley remained a problem. Serbia was recognized as an independent state in 1878 after several centuries under Ottoman rule. It formed the core of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes proclaimed in 1918. After World War II, Serbia became a constituent republic of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, under the communist rule of Josip Broz Tito. Within the boundaries of the Serbian republic as drawn at that time were two autonomous provinces: the largely Albanian-populated Kosovo in the south, and Vojvodina, with a significant Hungarian minority, in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Country Report BTI 2014
    BTI 2014 | Montenegro Country Report Status Index 1-10 7.50 # 22 of 129 Political Transformation 1-10 7.90 # 23 of 129 Economic Transformation 1-10 7.11 # 28 of 129 Management Index 1-10 6.51 # 18 of 129 scale score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2014. It covers the period from 31 January 2011 to 31 January 2013. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2014 — Montenegro Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2014. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. BTI 2014 | Montenegro 2 Key Indicators Population M 0.6 HDI 0.791 GDP p.c. $ 14206.2 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.1 HDI rank of 187 52 Gini Index 28.6 Life expectancy years 74.5 UN Education Index 0.838 Poverty3 % 0.0 Urban population % 63.5 Gender inequality2 - Aid per capita $ 163.1 Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2013 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2013. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary Preparations for EU accession have dominated the political agenda in Montenegro during the period under review. Recognizing the progress made by the country on seven key priorities identified in its 2010 opinion, the European Commission in October 2011 proposed to start accession negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds in Translation: European Novels in Albanian Language
    552571-CREA-1-2014-1-AL-CULT-LIT1 Generated on: Sep 30, 2021 Subprogramme: Culture Action: Literary translation projects Project Title Worlds in translation: European novels in Albanian language Project Coordinator Organisation TOENA Address RRUGA M GJOLLESHA 1420 , 1001 1028 TIRANA , Albania , AL Project Information Project Number 552571-CREA-1-2014-1-AL-CULT-LIT1 Start Date Oct 1, 2014 End Date Sep 30, 2016 Union Grant 62,927.85 EUR This document has been generated by Creative Europe Project Results Platform Page 1 of 2 552571-CREA-1-2014-1-AL-CULT-LIT1 Generated on: Sep 30, 2021 Project Summary Worlds in translation: European novels in Albanian Language is a literary translation Project made possible by the Creative Europe policy to help and promote the Translation, publication and promotion of a package of nine novels chosen by Toena Publishing House with the aim to translate, distribute and promote a number of contemporary novels in Albania and Albanian Diaspora. Toena has undertaken in order to fulfil the project goals a series of activities and steps that include: 1. The accurate creation of a collection, containing the nine books in the package, connected by the details of a collection like, same format and main colours for all the books included, a name for the collection (in Albanian: Botë në përkthim: Pikëtakim i kulturave evropiane). 2. Participation in different Literary Festivals and Bookfairs, presented in our application and others where we usually participate during the year like: The Art and Book Festival (2015, Tirana), Tirana National Bookfair, International Bookfairs in: Turin, Thessaloniki, Skopje, Geneva, Pristina, local BookFairs in Albania like: Durres, Saranda, Tirana, Vlore, others not included in the Project like Montenegro, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • A European Montenegro How Are Historical Monuments Politically Instrumentalised in Light of Future Membership of the European Union?
    A European Montenegro How are historical monuments politically instrumentalised in light of future membership of the European Union? MA Thesis in European Studies Graduate School for Humanities Universiteit van Amsterdam Daniel Spiers 12395757 Main Supervisor: Dr. Nevenka Tromp Second Supervisor: Dr. Alex Drace-Francis December, 2020 Word Count: 17,660 Acknowledgments My time at the Universiteit van Amsterdam has been a true learning curve and this paper is only a part of my academic development here. I wish to express my gratitude to all the lecturing staff that I have had contact with during my studies, all of whom have all helped me mature and grow. In particular, I want to thank Dr. Nevenka Tromp who has been a fantastic mentor to me during my time at the UvA. She has consistently supported my academic aims and has been there for me when I have had concerns. Lastly, I want to thank the family and friends in my life. My parents, sister and grandparents have always supported me in my development, and I miss them all dearly. I show appreciation to the friends in my life, in Amsterdam, London, Brussels and Montenegro, who are aware of my passion for Montenegro and have supported me at every stage. Dedication I dedicate this thesis to the people of Montenegro who have lived through an extraordinary period of change and especially to those who believe that it is leading them to a brighter future. Abstract This thesis seeks to explore how historical monuments are politically instrumentalised in Montenegro in light of future membership of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Diplomacy's Winding Course 2012
    2012 - A Make or Break Year for Serbia and Kosovo? By Dr. Matthew Rhodes and Dr. Valbona Zeneli nstead of the hoped for turn to normalization, 2011 NATO and EU member states except Cyprus, Greece, Isaw escalated tensions over Kosovo. Agreement Romania, Slovakia, and Spain. on Kosovo’s participation in regional fora and Serbia’s formal advance to Serbia’s challenge before EU candidacy in early 2012 the International Court of have revived a cautious “The very active first three Justice (ICJ) marked the centerpiece of its strategy sense of optimism, but months of 2012 have restored unresolved underlying issues against Kosovo’s move. and approaching political a sense of calm regarding Winning support within the United Nations General contests leave the prospects Serbia and Kosovo. Intensified for further progress uncertain. Assembly in October 2008 Warnings of precipices and European and American for consideration of the case powder kegs are overdone represented a significant in the Balkans, but 2012 is diplomacy together with success for Serbian diplomacy. shaping up as a potentially leaders’ attention to larger However, the Court’s July decisive year for international 2010 decision that Kosovo’s policy in the region. goals prevented 2011’s act had not violated international law effectively skirmishes over border Despite the Euro-Atlantic closed off this challenge. community’s current internal posts and barricades from Potentially positively for both challenges, integration into sides, however, the case’s that community’s formal escalating into something conclusion opened the way structures remains the best worse. As welcome as that for direct talks on technical path for Balkan security issues between Belgrade and and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Serbia Date of Election: May 6, 2012 (Parliamentary and first round presidential); May 20, 2012 - second round presidential Prepared by: Bojan Todosijević Date of Preparation: 05. 08. 2013. NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: ° The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. ° Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. ° Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] ° If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ X] Upper House [ ] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • From Understanding to Cooperation Promoting Interfaith Encounters to Meet Global Challenges
    20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS FROM UNDERSTANDING TO COOPERATION PROMOTING INTERFAITH ENCOUNTERS TO MEET GLOBAL CHALLENGES Zagreb, 7 - 8 December 2017 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 3 PROGRAMME 10:00-12:30 hrs / Sessions I and II The role of religion in European integration process: expectations, potentials, limits Wednesday, 6 December 10:00-11:15 hrs Session I 20.30 hrs. / Welcome Reception hosted by the Croatian Delegation / Memories and lessons learned during 20 years of Dialogue Thursday, 7 December Co-Chairs: György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of 09:00 hrs / Opening the Working Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of the Working Opening message: Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue Dubravka Šuica MEP, Head of Croatian Delegation of the EPP Group Alojz Peterle MEP, former Responsible of the Interreligious Dialogue Welcome messages Interventions - Mairead McGuinness, First Vice-President of the European Parliament, - Gordan Jandroković, Speaker of the Croatian Parliament responsible for dialogue with religions (video message) - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Vito Bonsignore, former Vice-Chairman of the EPP Group responsible for - Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of Croatia Dialogue with Islam - Mons. Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek, Chairman of the International Krakow Church Conference Organizing Committee - Stephen Biller, former EPP Group Adviser responsible for Interreligious Dialogue Discussion 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 5 4 /20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 11:15-12:30 hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Internalizing European Politics in Croatia Senada Šelo Šabić
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 11, No. 1 (HR) October 2018 Croatia Political briefing: Internalizing European politics in Croatia Senada Šelo Šabić 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu Internalizing European politics in Croatia On 12 September 2018 the European Parliament voted on a resolution on a proposal to the European Council to consider possible measures against Hungary which is believed to be undermining the rule of law and fundamental rights. The resolution is based on a report submitted by Judith Sargentini, MEP (Member of the European Parliament) from the Greens. Croatian MEPs voted differently – some supported the resolution, some voted against it. This brief explains what were reasons for difference in voting. By doing so it also indicates how European politics is, step by step, internalized in Croatia which has marked its fifth year membership in the European Union. A motion against Hungary On 12 September 2018 the European Parliament voted for the first time in its history on a resolution against its member state. The resolution is “calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded.”1 The resolution is an expression of concern that Hungary is underperforming in the following areas: the functioning of the constitutional and
    [Show full text]
  • Left-Wing Movements' Boom in Hungary
    Left-wing movements’ boom in Hungary - Analysis of the situation of the Hungarian opposition - Tamás Boros – Arbeitspapier – Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Budapest Oktober 2012 Left-wing movements’ boom in Hungary - Analysis of the situation of the Hungarian opposition - Tamás Boros The Hungarian left-wing and liberal opposition faces an unprecedented situation: with the weakening of the Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) and the disappearance of its traditional coalition partner, the liberal Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ) in 2010, new parties and movements have started to rise in an effort to become inevitable politi- cal actors at the time of the next elections in 2014. The crucial question of the next two years is whether the Hungarian Socialist Party will be able to win the elections by itself, and, if not, whether an alliance of opposition movements can be created which will be able to defeat the current prime minister, Viktor Orbán. Between 1998 and 2010 a quasi two-party system characterised Hungary, where the Hungari- an Socialist Party and its liberal coalition partner faced off with the conservative Fidesz. The decision of the voters was as simple as choosing between the two sides – other parties, wheth- er brand new ones or ones with traditional ties, did not stand a reasonable chance of becoming a major political force in Hungary. By 2010, however, eight years spent in government had eroded the popularity of left-wing parties to such an extent that MSZP lost 60% of its former voters (1.4 million people) and SZDSZ all but disappeared from the political map of Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Trajtimi I Problemativave Ne Media.Pmd
    Qendra e Aleancës Gjinore për Zhvillim TRAJTIMI I PROBLEMATIKAVE SOCIALE NE MEDIA – Perspektivë gjinore 1 Janar – Mars 2009 Tiranë, 2009 Përgatitja dhe botimi i këtij materiali u mundësua nga OSFA – Fondacioni “Shoqëria e Hapur për Shqipërinë”, në kuadër të projektit “Trajtimi i problematikave sociale në media – perspektivë gjinore”, zbatuar nga “Qendra e Aleancës Gjinore për Zhvillim”. Autoret: Etleva Martiri Linda Mëniku Migena Kapllanaj © 2009. Të gjitha të drejtat janë të rezervuara për Qendrën e Aleancës Gjinore për Zhvillim”, Tiranë/Shqipëri. 2 Botuar nga: Qendra e Aleancës Gjinore për Zhvillim Kutia Postare 2418, Tiranë Tel/Fax: (++355) 42 255 514/5 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.gadc-al.org Faqosja & Kopertina: Elvira Osmani PËRMBAJTJA HYRJE.................................................................................... 5 Fokusi i monitorimit......................................................................... 7 Roli i medias në promovimin e barazisë gjinore ............................... 8 Gazetarë apo gazetare?.............................................................. 9 Gratë subjekte apo objekte të medias?..........................................10 GRUAJA NË VENDIMMARRJE DHE POLITIKBËRJE.......13 Analiza e shkrimeve të monitoruar për gratë në vendimmarrje.14 3 1. Fushat e pasqyruara ...........................................................17 2. Shkrimet për përfaqësimin politik të grave...........................19 3. Si pasqyrohen gratë në vendimmarrje?.................................21 3.1. Kur gratë
    [Show full text]
  • Sobranie: « Jean Monnet Dialogue» for Peace and Democracy
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT – SOBRANIE: « JEAN MONNET DIALOGUE» FOR PEACE AND DEMOCRACY PROGRAMME - 17 - 19 May 2018 Thursday, 17 May 2018 Individual Transfers/Transfer from Skopje to Ohrid organised by Sobranie 16.00 - 19.00 Bus transfer of the EP Delegation from the EUDel in Skopje to Ohrid 19.00 - 20.00 Check-in at the Inex Gorica Hotel or Laki Hotel & Spa 19.45 - 20.15 Bus transfer of participants from Laki Hotel & Spa to Inex Gorica 20.30 - 22.00 Welcome Dinner at the Inex Gorica Hotel Restaurant Keynote address: “The central role of the Sobranie in driving the EU integration and reform agenda” Commissioner Johannes HAHN, European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (recorded message) Mr Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Member of the European Parliament and Secretary-General of the European People’s Party, on behalf of EPP President Mr Joseph DAUL Welcome by: Mr Eduard KUKAN, Mr Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Mr Ivo VAJGL, Members of the European Parliament President Talat XHAFERI, Speaker of the Sobranie 22.00 Bus transfer of participants staying in Laki Spa Hotel to the hotel Friday, 18 May 18 08.30 - 09.00 Bus transfer of participants staying in Laki Spa Hotel to the Inex Gorica hotel 09.00 - 10.00 Opening of the Jean Monnet Dialogue process: core principle consensus on pursuing a united approach to Euro-Atlantic integration for the Macedonian people and institutional strengthening of the Sobranie as the democratic pillar of all reforms. (Methodology and rules of engagement) Co-chaired by President Mr Talat XHAFERI and Mr Ivo VAJGL (3 MEPs always sitting together but rotate the Chair per session).
    [Show full text]