DOCSLIB.ORG

Soviet Sub Logs Scanr Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soviet Sub Logs Scanr Document smut SECRET Da*e OPNAV Index TimeContacted by PositionBrief Classification Number \ / 18 Oct USN Patrol 12-55N/ 116-16JS Navy Patrol Aircraft gained sinker at 30 POSSIBLE 382-62 0640Z Aircraft (South China Sea) miles, lost at 29 miles. Jezebel contact held (Tentative) briefly; evaluated as 4 bladed prop, no surface ships in area. Julie and Sniffer tried with negative results. Contact cold after 40 minutes. (U-18) Navy P2V aircraft sighted Soviet "Z" class POSITIVE 383-62 submarine close aboard Soviet Naval oiler TEREK. Photos show oiler transferring canisters to sub, oil slicks indicate possible fueling operation earlier. (B-28) USS EDWARDS gained sonar contact on NON-SUB 384-62 submerged object. Sonar contact held by 2 (Tentative) destroyers, not confirmed by MAD. Evaluation of sonar tapes indicates contact biologic. (Q-22) HMS OWEN sighted periscope and held PROBABLE 385-6^ sonar contact for one hour. Evaluated (Tentative) Probable, possibly UAR. (G-l) U. S. Amphibious Task Group reported POSSIBLE 386-6 being trailed by intermittent radar contact W^PO suspected of being a submarine. Investigation uCj ~ by patrol aircraft unproductive. (E-50) PCC^I 22 Oct USN Patrol 43-55N/39-30W 1026Z Aircraft (665 miles ESE of 1 C. Race, Newfound f land) 3 Oct USN Ship 30-37N/ 120-55W )00Z (225 miles SW of San Diego) —jfect British 20-31N/ 38-45E OZ Ship (Red Sea) Oct USN Task 26-38N/75-55W )0Z Group SECRET Date Time OPNAV Index Contacted by PositionBriefClassification Number 24 0ct USN Patrol 25-08N/63-40W USN Patrol Aircraft sighted snort which sub- POSITIVE 387-62 1504Z Aircraft (SW North Atlantic) merged. Contact tenaciously prosecuted until surfaced. Photos confirm Soviet "F" class pendant number 945. Sub unable to submerge and was subsequently escorted to North Fleet port by Ocean Tug PAMIR. (C-18) USN Ship 44-21. 5N/124-40W USS WATTS gained sonar contact, later NON-SUB 388-62 evaluated marine life. (Q-23) (Tentative) 24 0ct USNSShip 43-21N/29-26W USNS FRANCIS X. McGRAW sighted POSSIBLE 389-62 1800Z periscope. Soviet oiler TEREK in area at time. (B-29) USN Patrol 41-43N/ 141-38E Navy Patrol Aircraft reported sighting whip POSITIVE 390-62 Aircraft (Eastern approach antenna and top of submarine conning tower. to Tsugaru St.) Contact dived shortly after sighting. Two aircraft held MAD contact for approximately 1 hour. Soviet tanker in vicinity of contact. USS MACKENZIE unable to gain sonar contact. (V-51) USN Ship 31-42N/ 121-03W USS ROBISON gained sonar contact on a POSSIBLE 391-62 (200 miles SW of submerged object. Patrol aircraft held MAD (Tentative) San Diego) contact for 83 minutes. Continued search by DD's, SS and patrol aircraft yielded negative results. Marine life in area. Possibility Q-22 and Q-25 same contact. (Q-25) DE LASSIFIED SECRET Date OPNAV Index Time Contacted by PositionBriefClassification Numb er ! j 25 Oct USN Ship 22-37N/ 175-16W USS JENKINS held sonar contact on sub- NON-SUB 392-62 I0700Z merged object. Contact split and multiple ; echos held. Contact DIW. Passive sonar and fathometer indicated object biologies. (R-18) j 125 Oct USN Patrol Soya Strait Navy Patrol Aircraft on Soya Straits barrier POSSIBLE 39-3-62 1345Z Aircraft (45-45N/ 141-18E) patrol reported possible sub based on LOFAR. (In area) Signature indicated "W" class. Data not (Tentative) sufficient to determine direction of movement, jk but possibly west to east. Speed estimated at 13 knots. (V-52) 25 Oct Game Warden 37-57N/75-19W Assateague Beach Game Warden reported NON-SUB 394-62 1410Z submarine headed seaward. Inexperienced (Tentative) source and water depth preclude possibility of submarine. Four fishing ships and a helicopter in vicinity at time of sighting. (E-51) USN Patrol 24-03N/63-33W Navy Patrol Aircraft gained sinker followed POSSIBLE 395-62 Aircraft by Jezebel contract. Area maintained under (Tentative) surveillance with no further contact. (C-25) Oct USN Patrol 28-20N/61-35W Navy Patrol Aircraft reported sinker followed POSSIBLE 396-62 3oZ Aircraft by possible sighting of snorkel. Intermittent (Evaluated same Julie and Jezebel contact gained during contact as .B-31) search. Time/distance factors relate this h; contact to contact B-31 and is thereby evaluated same contact as B-31. (B-30) 8 DECLASSIFIED f OPNAV Index Position Brief Classification Number 25 Oct USCG Aircraft 34-52N/75-12W U. S. Coast Guard aircraft reported sighting POSSIBLE 397-63 1642Z snorkel. Investigating aircraft gained sono- buoy contact followed by a SOSUS contact in the vicinity. Contact subsequently lost. Numerous whales in area. (E-52) 25 Oct U. S. Civilian 41-29N/ 124-11W Civilian woman on beach reported sighting NON-SUB 398-62 1915Z (6 miles south of surfaced submarine 7. 5 miles off shore in (Tentative) Crescent City, Cal.) 30 fathoms of water. Evaluated fishing boat or possibly rocks. (Q-26) 25 Oct USN Patrol 26-49N/ 67-26W USN Patrol Aircraft sighted submarine on POSITIVE 399-62 2211Z Aircraft surface. Photos confirm Soviet "F." class. No pendant number carried. Sub dived, intermittent contact maintained by aircraft. Sub sighted again on surface about 40 hours later. Contact was escorted by destroyers for about 45 hours. Sub dived and sonar contact lost after about 35 minutes. Intense search yielded intermitent contacts but all were inconclusive. (C-19) 26 Oct USN Ship 28-05N/78-01W USS EARLE B. HALL sighted green flare POSSIBLE 400-62 followed by sonar contact of 5 minutes duration. Patrol aircraft reported sinker in vicinity. USS ZELLERS and USS SUMNER ^JCfKQ ^ also searched around datum with negative Si^Jrmrr results. (E-53) 9 w — SKCRET DECLASSIFIED Date OPNAV Index TimeContacted byPositionBriefClassification Number 26 Oct Canadian Patrol 39-40N/50-19W Canadian Patrol Aircraft reported POSSIBLE 401-62 015OZ Aircraft machinery noises while conducting LOFAR search. No visual or MAD contacts during search. Jezebel indicated possible Soviet "Z" class submarine. (B-32) 26 Oct USNShip 33-59N/ 121-35W USS BAUSELL gained sonar contact on sub- NON-SUB 402-62 0300Z merged object. Evaluated possibly kelp due (Tentative) mushy echo, no doppler, and lack of move¬ ment. Aircraft unable to gain MAD or Julie contact. (Q-27) Oct USN Aircraft 37-35N/10-30E Navy F8U aircraft reported sighting sub- NON-SUB 403-62 35Z (Central Med) marine on surface then held silhouette after (Tentative) contact submerged. Aircraft altitude 30,000 feet. USS BAILEY in contact area. Search yielded negative results. (A-21) Oct Japanese 45-45N/ 141-18E Japanese patrol craft reported seven Soviet POSITIVE 404-62 Patrol Craft (Soya Strait) submarines transiting Soya Straits westbound. (In area) through USN patrol aircraft confirmed sightings with 410-62 photos. Five units believed transited with NOSERO convoy. Class and pendant numbers sighted: "W" class numbers 835, 743, 745, 3.60, and 7'61. "Wn(Long Bin) class numbers 442 and 311. (V-53 through V-59) 10 IMF SECRIST V Tine Contactgd^^^PSSa^a. ~ USN Patrol 21-3W/6«-74W 12192 Aircraft 26 Oct USN Patrol 18-5$N/*5-35W 21052 Aircraft 27 Oct VSNAISW 2ff-13N/f3-^W 0631Z sMsoisalfc (Wiridwar-d • • •** S&*V Passage) ^„ v.- |7 Oct mW Patrol 47-55N/175-SOW 1132; Aircraft (250 miles south of Atka, Alaska) Uil ^&h$ Brief OPNAV USN Patrol Aircraft sighted submarine on POSITIVE -411-62 surface 5 minutes before submarine sub¬ merged. Photos confirm Soviet "PH class. Contact subsequently lost. Contact initially gained by SOSUS. (C-2G) USN Patrol Aircraft gained ECM. contact with PROBABLE 412-62 possible Snoop Plate radar characteristics;, y w§^m§mm_ followed by a sinker. This coritacppiiOh^a off an intense 20 day hunt: ^hl^^^|^^ j^^mmk^^^^^:^l^^^ sonar op^acts: andLOFAB contacts* 'M^M^&$^0^fkP^^ by patrol aircraft When it reported :S*ghtih| sub with M^^^^^^^^^^^^'^ *Q miieSv Evaluation of all evidence, (recordings, grams> arid observer debriefs, ^^0^^^§f^^^ elusive to merit higher clasSlfication.(C*'2l) USN A-E'W Aircraft gained sinker and NON-SUB 413-62 investigating destroyers gained sonar con- (Tentative) tact. School of porpoises Sighted in area. Contact evaluated porpoise. (C-22) USN Patrol Aircraft gained brief Jezebel NON-SUB 414-62 contact and possible sinker while on barrier (Tentative^ search. Aircraft unable to regain contact in subsequent search. (S-25) 11 DECLASSIFIED SECRET &E&ITCI JDate Time Contacted by Position 37 Oct USNT Patrol 29-07!*/ 63 -59 W 13152 Aircraft -O J27 0et OSNlFatpbl 24-54N/7i-05W 1010.2 Aircraft . %ct GttttadkutSbiipa 51*0^ 17-0 3 W • ^ >• • vi* :'-f:X-: *V Oct . { USAF Aircraft 34-00N/ 72-00W V '' §§§«& x !«§<' OPNAV huie* Brief Classlticattont Kiimber: POSITIVE 416-62 . :-:-.:.-: '. >-.•••: -;•••:.-:'•-:-•>.-.--••.-:•:•:-.•• -.. '.'•:•':•;. '^::y;>?^s^6M^] ' . ' ''. "' '''.'''- : •'?':'.::'• :0::::- , . .;.•-.•;:.•'. •.;.•; •:;>;:; "x;:X:>V::::: ,:::; '"'. •.•.-.•-•:• :-v • :• ..':':•:•' ''.'''': v - • • : .• . : . : POSSIBLE 417-62 (Tentative) USN Patrol Aircraft gained sinker and sighted PROBABLE 415-62 swirl on approach. Intermittent Julie/ Jezebel and SOSUS contact held for 3 days in vicinity. Forces unable to localize and contact sub¬ sequently lost. (B--31) USN Patrol Aircraft sighted submarine oh surface- Photos confirm Soviet "FH class. Hp pendant humber. Contact submerged and subsequently lost. (C -23) Four Canadian ships held firm radar contact which faded abruptly at 8 miles. Contact course 090, speed 18 knots. 3>fo visual con¬ tacts in area. (H-219) USAF aircraft reported sighting- a cargo ship NON-SUB: I>;v4l8~62^ with a^.possible submarine trailing at a distance of 5 miles. U;S* Naval Task Group In area at this time. {£-55) r ••..• <$ •-...... SOSUS contact gained on possible Soviet ilF" POSSIBLE 419-62 or ,t2»M class submarine. Patrol aircraft unable to localize. (C-24) ii DICLASSfFIED soviet sub logs scanR Document.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operation Dominic I
    OPERATION DOMINIC I United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review Prepared by the Defense Nuclear Agency as Executive Agency for the Department of Defense HRE- 0 4 3 6 . .% I.., -., 5. ooument. Tbe t k oorreotsd oontraofor that tad oa the book aw ra-ready c I I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I i I I I i i t I REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NC I NA6OccOF 1 i Technical Report 7. AUTHOR(.) i L. Berkhouse, S.E. Davis, F.R. Gladeck, J.H. Hallowell, C.B. Jones, E.J. Martin, DNAOO1-79-C-0472 R.A. Miller, F.W. McMullan, M.J. Osborne I I 9. PERFORMING ORGAMIIATION NWE AN0 AODRCSS ID. PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT. TASU Kamn Tempo AREA & WOW UNIT'NUMSERS P.O. Drawer (816 State St.) QQ . Subtask U99QAXMK506-09 ; Santa Barbara, CA 93102 11. CONTROLLING OFClCC MAME AM0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE 1 nirpctor- . - - - Defense Nuclear Agency Washington, DC 20305 71, MONITORING AGENCY NAME AODRCSs(rfdIfI*mI ka CamlIlIU Olllc.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (-1 ah -*) J Unclassified SCHCDULC 1 i 1 I 1 IO. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This work was sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS 1 Code 6350079464 U99QAXMK506-09 H2590D. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. KEY WOROS (Cmlmm a nm.. mid. I1 n.c...-7 .nd Id.nllh 4 bled nlrmk) I Nuclear Testing Polaris KINGFISH Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) FISHBOWL TIGHTROPE DOMINIC Phase I Christmas Island CHECKMATE 1 Johnston Island STARFISH SWORDFISH ASROC BLUEGILL (Continued) D.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Legion [Volume 151, No. 4 (October 2001)]
    Military $hmUge$ Campalgn-FlMmB Reform Mffto's the Boss? . Fit-For i EXECUTIVE SLACKS FREE 34 Postage! Heavenly fabric, new /leathered hues and still the best-fitting pants e^er created! T-C-H 4 extra inches of S-T-R-E-T-C-H! Haband 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Peckville, PA 18452 only you it's there!) {and know | Send slacks. I enclose $ purchase • price plus toward postage. Oxford-weave imparts a soft hand : FOR MAXIMUM COMFORT, and fine drape ORDER YOUR USUAL WAIST SIZE! Postage^ • Heathered colors are deep dyed, Waist: 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 rich and lustrous i *Big Men (just $3 more per pair): 46 48 50 52 54 • Fit Forever ' elastic inserts provided Inseams: S(27-28) M(29-30) L(31-32) XL(33-34) additional stretch -'^ • Machine wash & wear polyester Checl< for • Slimming flat front, dress pant i 06 Grey IHeatiier (70A) Fit- Forever Belt. 03 Navy Heather G-i-v-e-s tailored lining in the waistband f ' • Green Heather one full inch! Bonded 2 quarter top pockets, 2 back : leather. $6.95 ea. Brown Heather button-thru pockets and a handy ; Even sizes 30-54. functional watch pocket too! Fit-Forever Belts • Sturdy top-stitched belt loops Visa Smooth, reverses to 'gator look. Priced to move, too — hurry! i n Biscoverl yjlil=^ Exp.: /_ >;&m^*fiK*ille, PA 18452 City & State Zip. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed or ?;;f^'^catt|.800-543-48IOo'^ L Full Refund of Purchase Price at Any Time! 10 HOW Loud Does Money Talk? Experts Bradley A.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
    Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship. According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include rivers, canals, estuaries, and deltas. They do not include open deep-water bays and harbors such as those at Da Nang Harbor, Qui Nhon Bay Harbor, Nha Trang Harbor, Cam Ranh Bay Harbor, Vung Tau Harbor, or Ganh Rai Bay. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. In order to promote consistent application of the term “inland waterways”, VA has determined that Ganh Rai Bay and Qui Nhon Bay Harbor are no longer considered to be inland waterways, but rather are considered open water bays.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Veteran Has Inspired a Lifetime of Service
    A SPECIAL SECTION TO THE DARIEN TIMES Thursday,M May 25, 2018 EMORIALDAY2018 1D Above, John Geoghegan on right. At left, painting of one of his torpedo bombers. After 93 years: World War II veteran has inspired a lifetime of service by Susan Shultz needed papers signed by my Times Editor father to allow me to enlist, which I finally did on Feb. 3, Time spent flying is not 1943.” deducted from one’s lifespan. World War II took Geoghe- This saying, hanging on his gan to aviation radio school wall, has been never more in Jacksonville, Fla. Then “on true than for Darien’s John to Gunnery school at a place Geoghegan, 93, who is still called Yellow Water in Flor- going strong, and can still ida where I learned all about remember every detail of his the machine gun and how to service to his country despite it use it effectively,” he said. being seven decades ago. “On to further training with a Born in Memphis, Tenn., on newly commissioned torpedo Feb. 11, 1925, John Geoghe- squadron and eventually was gan, moved to Stratford with transferred to VT14 aboard his sister and family in 1927. the Essex class aircraft USS “The depression took the Wasp.” house, and sent us to Cos Geoghegan was shot in the Cob,” Geoghegan said. He leg serving as a radioman John Geoghegan in his Darien attended Greenwich High gunner on a Grumman TBF home. Above, shrapnel from his School. “My favorite study Avenger. He didn’t even real- was physics. We had a radio ize he had been shot until he gunshot wound in his leg.
    [Show full text]
  • A Haven for Tortured Souls': Hong Kong in the Vietnam
    Copyright by Peter Evan Hamilton 2011 The Report committee for Peter Evan Hamilton Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: ‘A Haven for Tortured Souls’: Hong Kong in the Vietnam War APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: _________________________________ Mark A. Lawrence _________________________________ H. W. Brands ‘A Haven for Tortured Souls’: Hong Kong in the Vietnam War by Peter Evan Hamilton, B.A. Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin December 2011 To my parents, Drs. James J. Hamilton and Linda Z. Hamilton. A small token of my appreciation for their constant support and sacrifice. ‘A Haven for Tortured Souls’: Hong Kong in the Vietnam War by Peter Evan Hamilton, MA The University of Texas at Austin, 2011 SUPERVISOR: Mark A. Lawrence This essay details the profound economic and social impact of the Vietnam War on Hong Kong. The British colony provided essential strategic facilities to the U.S. war effort and ranked among the largest destinations for American servicemen on R&R. Between 1965 and 1970, Hong Kong annually hosted about 200,000 U.S. ground and naval personnel on holiday. This influx annually earned Hong Kong about US$300-400 million (in 2009 dollars) and employed thousands of residents working in the colony’s service and entertainment industries. In addition, American servicemen and the local businesses catering to them became a contentious issue in local society. Servicemen excited widespread interest, but their misdeeds and their bar and brothel stomping grounds provoked intense anxiety.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliance Reunions by Date As of February 6, 2010 for More About Any Reunion, See Alliance Reunions Alphabetically
    Alliance Reunions by Date As of February 6, 2010 For more about any reunion, see Alliance Reunions Alphabetically. 02/25/10 - NMCB 62 & PWD Edzell, Scotland Seabees. Hampton, VA 04/07/10 - USS Trout (SS-566). Jacksonville, FL 04/16/10 - USS Chambers (DRE-391). Philadelphia, PA 04/21/10 - 88th Infantry (Blue Devil) Division Assn. and TRUST Troopers, Southeastern Chapter. Clearwater, FL 04/21/10 - USS Inchon (LPH/MCS-12). New Orleans, LA 04/22/10 - Air Force Public Affairs Alumni Association 17th Annual Membership Meeting. Orlando, FL 04/22/10 - USS Muliphen AKA/LKA-61. Baltimore, MD 04/29/10 - USS Catahaoula Parish (LST-528). Charleston, SC 04/29/10 - USS Howard W. Gilmore (AS-16). Philadelphia, PA 04/29/10 - USS Roanoke CL145 Assoc.. Hampton, VA 04/29/10 - USS Steinaker (DD/DDR-863). Portland, ME 04/30/10 - H.M.S. Tenby. Bournemouth, Hants 04/30/10 - USS Compton (DD-705). Warwick, RI 04/30/10 - VC-7 (Composite Squadron 7). Branson, MO 05/02/10 - USAF 52-C Pilot's Class. Charleston, SC 05/02/10 - YAGRS (Radar Picket Ship Association). Reunion cruise (Carnival Freedom) 05/05/10 - Field Artillery Officer Candidate School. Fort Sill, OK 05/06/10 - USS Allen M.Sumner (DD-692) All hands reunion. Pensacola, FL 05/10/10 - USS Blackfin (SS-322). Reno, NV 05/12/10 - 91st Strategic Reconnaissance Wing Association. San Antonio, TX 05/12/10 - USS Cronin (DE/DEC 704) Association. New Orleans, LA 05/12/10 - USS Flasher SSN 613. Seattle, WA 05/13/10 - 435th OMS Enroute Memorial Plaque Reunion.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliance Reunions Alphabetically As of February 6, 2010 These Are Reunions Held by Members of the Alliance of Military Reunions
    Alliance Reunions Alphabetically As of February 6, 2010 These are reunions held by members of The Alliance of Military Reunions. The top of this web page has links to listings by Branch of Service, by Date, and by Location. 1st Engineer Combat Battalion, 1st Infantry Div. 9/19/10-9/21/10 (Sun-Tue), Williamsburg, VA. Contact Bob Brink, 7642 Botting Rd, Racine, WI 53402, 262-639-4405, [email protected] http://www.diehardengineer.com 1st Military Intelligence Battalion 7/08/10-7/11/10 (Thu-Sun), Las Vegas, NV. Contact Don Skinner, 1908 River Rd., Hillsboro, OR 97123, 503-648-6059, [email protected] http://military- intelligence.wikispaces.com/1st+MIBARS 3rd Admin Company 3rd Inf Div Reunion 4/29/11-5/02/11 (Fri-Mon), TBD. Contact Gerald Campos, 1812 Severn Hills Ln, Severn, MD 21144, 410-519-4369, [email protected] 4th Infantry Division Association Annual National Reunion 7/12/10-7/18/10 (Mon-Sun), Norfolk, VA. Contact Don Kelby, PO Box 1914, St Peters, MO 66376, 314-606-1969, [email protected] http://www.4thInfantry.org 4th/152nd Reunion Association, Inc (CH37 Mojave) 9/15/10-9/19/10 (Wed-Sun), Williamsburg, VA. Contact Jimmy O Huntington, 7886 Hickory Wood Lane, Gloucester, VA 23061, 757-884-8542, [email protected] http://mojavereunion.org 5th Battalion, 60th Infantry Association 6/17/10-6/20/10 (Thu-Sun), Wichita, KS. Contact William Metzler, 377 Pebble Beach Drive, Rio Vista, CA 94571-2140, 707-374-1377, [email protected] http://5thbattalion.tripod.com/ 9th Engineer Bn. U.S.M.C.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.S. GEARING (DD-710) ASSOCIATION, Inc. MESSAGE
    U.S.S. GEARING (DD-710) ASSOCIATION, Inc. NEWSLETTER # 1-11 03-07-11 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN For those who need to use their computers while at the reunion, Shortly after the 2010 reunion I wanted to take advantage of the wireless Internet is complimentary throughout the hotel. difficult economy in the Greater Tampa Bay area and try to lock in In the near future the hotel will have a link with Cindy’s website 2010 prices for the 2012 reunion. On Thursday, May 27, 2010 and there will be a link provided to the Gearing website so that Ken Baker, his wife Pam, Cindy Campbell of Campbell Travel and with just a click of the mouse members will be able to navigate I met with representatives of the Crowne Plaza Tampa Westshore easily between the sites. Hotel. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR VIETNAM We toured the hotel, looked at the available rooms for the banquet, VETERANS hospitality, meetings, and the sleeping rooms. We were impressed with the cleanliness of the facility and the spaciousness of the Recently, the VA recognized a number of Brown Water (inland sleeping rooms. Most of all, we were impressed with the price. water ways) Navy vessels that are presumed to have been exposed Room rates will be $85.00 per night plus applicable tax. This is to Agent Orange. very close to the same price we paid in Charleston, SC. Tampa The ships and dates of inland waterway service are listed below. If secured the 2012 Republican Convention and consequently, room a veteran’s service aboard one of these ships can be confirmed rates will go up significantly next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Deployed 170213
    Deployed A Destroyer Story by Bruce Bade February 2015 FOREWORD !The drafting of this story was undertaken when I began to read the letters my wife and I had exchanged during my several extended deployments in Navy ships. Of course I was reliving those times as I read. !The deployment of USS JAMES E. KYES (DD 787) in 1972 presented a story of particular interest to me. When the letters were written I had a very focused view of my existence but, forty-odd years later, I needed a more comprehensive view of what had happened. Therefore I excerpted from the letters those passages that described what the ship and I had been doing. A compilation of these gave me a better understanding of the deployment. !It was so interesting to me that I wanted to share the compilation with my daughter, who was born after that deployment, with former shipmates, and with a few friends who, I thought, might be interested. The excerpts, however, required some explanation for those who hadn"t had the pleasure of serving in a destroyer. The compilation of excerpts thus expanded to a more complete story. !While my memories are still pretty vivid, I was able to rely on some papers I"d kept. For example, I"d kept copies of all the daily ammunition expenditure reports. A bit less anally, I"d also kept some reports and messages that helped me reconstruct the chronology. !This story was never intended to address the home front, either on a personal or political level, nor was it intended to address any of the larger questions attendant to the conduct of the Vietnam war.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No.1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi-110010
    Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No.1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi-110010 Journal of Defence Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.idsa.in/journalofdefencestudies Revisiting the 1971 ‘USS Enterprise Incident’: Rhetoric, Reality and Pointers for the Contemporary Era Raghavendra Mishra To cite this article: Raghavendra Mishra (201 5): Revisiting the 1971 ‘USS Enterprise Incident’: Rhetoric, Reality and Pointers for the Contemporary Era, Journal of Defence Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2 April-June 2015, pp. 49-80 URL http://idsa.in/jds/9_2_2015_Revisitingthe1971USSEnterpriseIncident.html Please Scroll down for Article Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.idsa.in/termsofuse This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re- distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDSA or of the Government of India. Revisiting the 1971 ‘USS Enterprise Incident’ Rhetoric, Reality and Pointers for the Contemporary Era Raghavendra Mishra* The USS Enterprise naval task group entry into the Indian Ocean during the closing stages of 1971 Indo-Pak Conflict led to further deterioration in the relations between India and the United States (US), and this estrangement lasted until the end of the Cold War. The US couched this show of force under the rubric of ensuring safety of American personnel caught up in a war zone. In India, however, this was seen as a coercive attempt to prop up a genocidal military regime.
    [Show full text]
  • On & Off Capitol Hill the USS NEW JERSEY Americanism Essay
    JULY 2021 THE LEGACY OF THE LCAC INSIDE: 8 On & Off Capitol Hill 26 The USS NEW JERSEY 34 Americanism Essay Contest Winners Bad to the Bone Full tang stainless steel blade with natural bone handle —now ONLY$79! he very best hunting knives possess a perfect balance of form and Tfunction. They’re carefully constructed from fine materials, but also have that little something extra to connect the owner with nature. EXCLUSIVE If you’re on the hunt for a knife that combines impeccable craftsmanship with a sense of wonder, the $79 Huntsman Blade is the trophy you’re FREEStauer® 8x21 looking for. Compact The blade is full tang, meaning it doesn’t stop at the handle but extends Binoculars to the length of the grip for the ultimate in strength. The blade is made -a $99 value- from 420 surgical steel, famed for its sharpness and its resistance to with purchase of corrosion. Huntsman Blade The handle is made from genuine natural bone, and features decorative wood spacers and a hand-carved motif of two overlapping feathers— a reminder for you to respect and connect with the natural world. This fusion of substance and style can garner a high price tag out in the marketplace. In fact, we found full tang, stainless steel blades with bone handles in excess of $2,000. Well, that won’t cut it around here. We have mastered the hunt for the best deal, and in turn pass the spoils on to our customers. But we don’t stop there. While supplies last, we’ll include a pair of $99 8x21 power compact binoculars and a genuine leather What Stauer Clients sheath FREE when you purchase the Are Saying About Huntsman Blade.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 2B USA Surface Ships
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships. The other parts are: Part 1: Introduction Part 2A: United States – Submarines Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]