DOCSLIB.ORG

CUTR Transit Standards Working Group February 21‐22, 2018 MARTA, Atlanta, GA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CUTR Transit Standards Working Group February 21‐22, 2018 MARTA, Atlanta, GA February 21‐22, 2018 CUTR Standards Working Group CUTR, Tampa, FL (11/3/2017) 1 CUTR Transit Standards Working Group February 21‐22, 2018 MARTA, Atlanta, GA 2 1 February 21‐22, 2018 Welcome and Introductions . Welcome from MARTA’s Executive Team . Lisa Staes –CUTR, Director Transit Safety and Workforce Development Programs . Safety Briefing –AJ Joshi, MARTA . Transit Standards Working Group Facilitator –James Tucci, K & J Safety and Security Consulting Services, Inc., President & Chief Engineer 3 CUTR Working Group Members . AJ Joshi, MARTA . Patrick Moore, Greeley‐ . Brian Alberts, APTA Evans Transit (CO) . Charlie Dickson, CTAA . Paul Goyette, Lee Tran . Colin Mulloy, HART . Rich Czeck, GCRTA . Ed Watt, ATU . Robin Philips, National RTAP . Jim Fox, SEPTA . Ron Nickle, MBTA . Kurt Wilkinson, TriMet . Stephan Parker, TRB . Narayana Sundaram, APTA . Susan Hausmann, TxDOT . Ni Lee, BART . Vijay Khawani, LAMetro . Pat Lavin, WMATA 4 2 February 21‐22, 2018 Agenda –February 21, 2018 8:00am Welcome and Introductions 9:00am Working Group Project Updates 11:00am New Focus Areas 12:00pm Working Lunch 1:30pm Day 1 Discussion/Day 2 Agenda Review 2:00pm Tour –MARTA TrackSafe Deployment 5 Agenda –February 22, 2018 8:00am Day 1 Recap – Discussion 8:30am Review Top 3 (+1) Safety Concerns 10:15am Recommended Focus Area Research Priorities 12:00pm Working Lunch 1:00pm APTA Standards and Focus Area Research Recommendations 2:15pm Volpe Efforts Underway to Develop a Detailed Safety Event Causal Taxonomy of the Transit Industry 3:45pm Session Review and Wrap Up 4:30pm Adjourn 6 3 February 21‐22, 2018 Minute Review Session #3 Microsoft Word November 2‐3, 2017 | Tampa, FL Document Major Topics Covered Day 1 Major Topics Covered Day 2 . Working Group . Top 3 Safety Concerns Subcommittee Project Relevant to Updates Events/Incidents . APTA Standards Program . Briefing –SRI Process for Selecting Rail Research Process Projects and Overview of . New Focus Areas Implementation of Results of SRI Research into AAR . APTA Safety Management Standards Program . Potential New Focus Areas . Safety Certification for . Discussion of Sharing Projects Research 7 Working Group Project Updates 8 4 February 21‐22, 2018 Transportation Technology Center, Inc., a subsidiary of the Association of American Railroads Review of Standards for Track Inspection and Maintenance © TTCI/AAR. p9 ® Scope of Work ♦ Track Inspection – ●What types of inspections are being done on track? ●What standards define track inspections? ●Frequency of inspections? ●Technologies being utilized for inspections? ♦ Track Maintenance – ●What standards define how maintenance should be performed and to what criteria? ●Program maintenance/track renewals vs. local maintenance © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p10 5 February 21‐22, 2018 ® Tasks in Statement of Work ♦ Literature Review – U.S. Standards and Non-U.S. Standards ●Track Inspection ●Track Maintenance ♦ Transit agency data collection – what are agencies currently using for best practices of inspection and maintenance? ●Will benchmark with Class 1 Railroads ♦ Listing of technologies being used for inspection including overview of level of implementation (i.e. further testing needed?) ♦ Gap analysis – what standards do not exist for track inspection and maintenance? ♦ Recommendations © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p11 ® Project Status: Current Work ♦ Literature Review ●Review of track-caused accidents ▲Federal Railroad Administration ▲Federal Transit Administration ▲National Transportation Safety Board ●Search of relevant standards ▲North America ▲Europe ▲Asia ●Draft comparison document in process ♦ Survey of Track Inspection and Maintenance ●Survey developed and distributed to State Safety Officers ▲30 responses as of 2/05/18 © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p12 6 February 21‐22, 2018 FRA Derailments with Passenger Trains (Yes) and ® Without (No) – Breakdown 10 Year Total (2007-2016) 13,422 682 226 Y N (blank) Note: Data was downloaded 11/8/2017 © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p13 FRA Passenger Derailments by Cause Group ® 10 Year Total (2007-2016) 19 2 86 29 90 E - Mechanical and Electrical Failures H - Train Operation - Human Factors M - Miscellaneous S - Signal and Communication T - Track, Roadbed and Structures Note: Data was downloaded 11/8/2017 © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p14 7 February 21‐22, 2018 FRA Passenger Derailments by Track Subgroup ® 10 Year Total (2007-2016) 1 4 31 33 21 T0 - Roadbed T1 - Track Geometry T2 - Rail, Joint Bar and Rail Anchoring T3 - Frogs, Switches and Track Appliances T4 - Other Way and Structure Note: Data was downloaded 11/8/2017 © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p15 NTD Data by Incident Category ® 9 Year Total (2008-2016) 40,445 8,814 1,011 1,864 2,756 505 Fire Non-RGX Collision Other RGX Collision Derailment Security © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p16 8 February 21‐22, 2018 NTD Data, Derailments Only ® 9 Year Total (2008-2016) 140 131 Data in 2015-2016 includes 126 “yard” derailments 120 100 80 60 Derailments 44 39 38 35 40 31 34 27 20 0 Note: Data was downloaded 11/8/2017 © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p17 NTD Derailments by Type ® 9 Year Total (2008-2016) 475 30 Other Track Related Note: Data was downloaded 11/8/2017 © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p18 9 February 21‐22, 2018 NTD Derailments by FRA Track Subgroup ® 9 Year Total (2008-2016) Note: Data was downloaded 11/8/2017 © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p19 NTD Derailments, Track Specific ® 9 Years (2008-2016) 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 Derailments 6 6 5 5 4 4 333 2 1 0 Note: Data was downloaded 11/8/2017 Note: NTD data is from 2008 through 2016 © TTCI/AAR, 1/11/2012, Filename p20 10 February 21‐22, 2018 ® Review of NTSB Accident Reports ♦ WMATA – July 29, 2016 ●Wide gage due to tie deterioration/fastener failure ●Over 400 inches of rail with no fastening ●Monthly track inspections versus prescribed bi-weekly ♦ Amtrak – March 14, 2016 ●Unattended truck rolled into track causing misalignment ●Incident not reported to BNSF ●Passenger train encountered track misalignment and derailed ♦ Metro-North – July 18, 2013 ●CSX freight train derailment from lateral movement of rail ●Improper fasteners allowed lateral rail movement ●Fouled ballast, rail seat deterioration, center-cracked ties © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p21 ® Review of NTSB Accident Reports ♦ WMATA – January 7, 2007 ●Derailment of train through a crossover ●Improperly trued wheel with surface roughness ●Missing guardrail on turnout ♦ CTA – July 11, 2016 ●Wide gage resulted in derailment of train ●Corroded tie plates and fasteners with water-damaged half ties ●Inadequate inspection (entire section not completed) ♦ MBTA – May 4, 1998 ●Restraining rail not replaced in track after track replacement ●Derailment due to lack of restraining rail © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p22 11 February 21‐22, 2018 ® Summary of Track-Caused Accidents ♦ Rare events ♦ Trends are positive ●Number of events has been steady ▲Accounting for reporting change in 2015 ●Traffic is increasing ♦ Special trackwork is the leading cause category ●Gapped switches ●Worn, chipped or broken switch points ♦ Rail-related failures are the second leading cause ●Rail service failures ♦ Track geometry defects are the third leading cause ●Rail fastener failures ●Wide gage © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p23 ® Track Inspection Literature Review ♦ Standards reviewed to date Affiliation Country/Location Standard/Recommendation Year FRA United States Safety Standard 2014 APTA United States Safety Standard 2017 Maintenance FTA United States 2010 Recommendations TC Canada Safety Standard 2012 Inspection and Maintenance AREMA United States 2017 Recommendations CARS China Safety Standard 2017 © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p24 12 February 21‐22, 2018 ® Track Inspection Literature Review ♦ Inspection Topics ●Rail ●Continuously welded rail ●Fastening system ●Special trackwork ●Crossties ●Roadbed ●Ballast ●Track geometry ●Rail joints ●Inspection frequency © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p25 ® Track Inspection Literature Review ♦ Example: rail inspection ●Four primary topics ♦ General observations: ●FRA, APTA, FTA, TC similar ●Small differences Topics FRA APTA FTA TC Defective Rails Rail Wear Rail End Mismatch Torch Cut Rails © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p26 13 February 21‐22, 2018 ® Track Inspection Technologies ♦ Technologies reviewed to date Track Component or Inspection Technology Frequency Feature Example: LIDAR Clearance Annual Ultrasonic Lasers LIDAR Ground Penetrating Radar Thermography Machine vision Deflection (vertical) Deflection (lateral) X-ray Other © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p27 ® Track Maintenance Literature Review ♦ Slower progress to date ♦ Found fewer published standards ●Will compile best practices ●Many freight and passenger railways set maintenance limit as safety limit for one class higher track ●Variations in maintenance methods related to: ▲Relative cost of track time ▲Access and logistics issues © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p28 14 February 21‐22, 2018 ® Project Status: Current Work ♦ Survey of track inspection and maintenance ●Survey developed and distributed to State Safety Officers ▲46 question survey ─ Transit infrastructure and operations ─ Track inspection Methods Technologies ─ Track maintenance Philosophy Methods ▲30 responses as of 2/07/18 © TTCI/AAR, 2/14/2018. p29 ® Project Status: Current Work ♦ Survey of track inspection and maintenance Kenosha Area Transit ●Data on transit agencies Regional Transit Authority of New Orleans Rock Region Metro/ METRO Streetcar ▲Miles of track Regional Transportation District - Denver Sun Link - Tucson ▲Track structure Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kenosha County on the Movex
    Kenosha County on the Move Beyond the KRM On June 15th, 2010 the Legislative Committee of the Kenosha County Board heard citizen comments on resolution number 8 submitted by Supervisor Erin Decker. Supervisor Decker’s resolution called for a county wide ballot referendum about the Kenosha Racine Milwaukee commuter rail line (KRM). Resolution 8 comes as a response to three bills that have been considered by the Wisconsin State Legislature, Senate Bill 205 (SB-205)/Assembly Bill 282 (AB-282), Assembly Bill 723 (AB-723)/Senate Bill 511 (SB- 511) and Assembly Bill 75 (AB-75). All three bills deal with Regional Transportation Authorities (RTA) and specifically the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Transportation Authority (SERTA). AB-75 passed the legislature. After hearing citizens comments at the Legislative Committee meeting it became quite clear that not enough information has been disseminated both to locally elected officials and citizens. The disparity between the amount of information and its distribution needed a deeper inquiry as to what information was used to create SB-205/AB-282, AB-723/ SB-511, and AB-75. This inquiry revealed that strict focus on the taxation of the KRM prevented full discussion at the legislative committee meeting of the issues underlying the three bills moving through the legislature. This brief address questions raised by citizens during the citizen comments portion of the June 15th meeting of the Legislative Committee, and it addresses items that surfaced throughout the crafting of AB- 282/SB-205, AB-723/SB-511,
    [Show full text]
  • Kenosha County Transit Planning Advisory Committee
    - 1 - Minutes of the Third Meeting KENOSHA COUNTY TRANSIT PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Date: August 27, 2009 TIME: 1:00 p.m. PLACE: Community Idea Center Gateway Horizon Center 4940 88th Avenue Kenosha, WI 53144 Committee Members Present Len Brandrup ........................................................ Director, City of Kenosha Department of Transportation Kimberly Breunig .................................................................................. Supervisor, Kenosha County Board Dr. Arthur I. Cyr ................................................................................................ Professor, Carthage College Pam Devuyst ............................................................................................................ Citizen, City of Kenosha Dennis DuChene II ............................................. President, Kenosha Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Carolyn Feldt ............................................................................... Manager, Elderly and Disability Services, Kenosha County Department of Human Services Adelene Greene ....................................................................................Director, Kenosha County job Center William Jordan .................................................................................Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 998 Lenny Klaver ................................................................ Vice Chancellor, University of Wisconsin Parkside Jeff Labahn.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Horario Y Mapa De Ruta De Autobús Efectivo En Febrero 1, 2020 Militares Activos O Retirados Y Titulares De Tarjetas VA VIAJAN GRATIS
    Horario y Mapa de Ruta de Autobús Efectivo en Febrero 1, 2020 Militares activos o retirados y titulares de tarjetas VA VIAJAN GRATIS. Lunes - Viernes Downtown detail Route number 52nd Street Start of route City Hall Point of interest Metra Station Museum Court House treet 56th S . Lakeside . d e Towers R v Lunes-Viernes A n a h 60th Street t d i 7 Centros de Rutas de r e h Simmons Transferencias Conexión S Library 63rd Street Kenosha Hospital 1oDonwntown 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & Medical Center 2 Kenosha Market 2, 5 3 Glenwood Crossing 1, 4, 5 7 Festival Foods 1, 3 Amazon 9 Southport 2, 4, 31, 35 16 Gateway 1 20 Indian Trail 3, 5, 31 Gordon Foods Detention Center e. Museum Av Business Park of 104th 58th Place Kenosha KTEC West Lakeside Towers 51Kenosha Hospital 31 St. Catherine’s Meijer Hospital Festival Foods Para Información Llamar Estacionamientos: Se requieren permisos mensuales de estacionamiento en los siguientes estacionamientos de la ciudad: 653-4BUS (653-4287) • Lot # 6 - 21st Ave. & 63rd St. • Lot # 9 - 5th Ave. & 57th St. Para Información en Español Hable El costo es de $25 por mes. Los permisos se pueden comprar en Kenosha Transit, 4303 - 39th Ave. al Telf. 652-2111 Estacionamientos METRA para viajeros diarios Social • Lot # 23 - 54th St. & 13th Ave. Services For bus route and bus pass information, El estacionamiento adyacente a la estación Metra requiere permisos de estacionamiento que visit www.kenosha.org están disponibles en los nuevos parquímetros frente a la estación Metra en la isla. El costo or call 653-4287 for details es de $60 por 30 días.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SEATTLE STREETCAR Operations Report
    Seattle Department of Transportation SEATTLE STREETCAR Operations Report July 2019 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................4 1.1. South Lake Union Streetcar.....................................................................4 1.2. First Hill Streetcar ...................................................................................6 1.3. Center City Connector .............................................................................6 2. OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS ..................................................................................7 2.1. Governance Structure and Budget Overview ..........................................7 2.2. Status of Negotiations on New Streetcar ILA..........................................8 2.3. Safety & Security Update .........................................................................9 3. FINANCIAL METRICS .........................................................................................10 3.1. South Lake Union Streetcar...................................................................10 3.2. First Hill Streetcar .................................................................................13 3.3. Investment in Streetcar Operations ......................................................15 4. PERFORMANCE METRICS ..................................................................................17 4.1. Ridership ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Development Effects of Modern-Era Streetcars: an Assessment of Portland and Seattle
    Project 1798 October 2018 Examining the Development Effects of Modern-Era Streetcars: An Assessment of Portland and Seattle Jeffrey Brown, PhD Joel Mendez, PhD MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE transweb.sjsu.edu MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF Hon. Norman Y. Mineta Mineta Consortium for Transportation Mobility MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Founded in 1991, the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI), an organized research and training unit in partnership with the Founder, Honorable Norman Richard Anderson (Ex-Officio) Steve Heminger* (TE 2018) Dan Smith (TE 2020) Lucas College and Graduate School of Business at San José State University (SJSU), increases mobility for all by improving the safety, Mineta (Ex-Officio) President and CEO Executive Director President Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Metropolitan Transportation Capstone Financial Group, Inc. efficiency, accessibility, and convenience of our nation’s transportation system. Through research, education, workforce development, Transportation Commission (MTC) and technology transfer, we help create a connected world. MTI leads the four-university Mineta Consortium for Transportation Vice Chair Laurie Berman (Ex-Officio) Paul Skoutelas (Ex-Officio) Hill & Knowlton, Inc. Director Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) President & CEO Mobility, a Tier 1 University Transportation Center funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant California Department Principal & Chair of Board American Public Transportation Secretary for Research and
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas River SERVICE
    7 W. Broadway St. Argenta E. Broadway St. 26 10 10 13 District 4 4 City Services Dickey Stephens 36 36 Building Park Simmons Bank Poplar St. Arena NLR Chamber Main St. Maple St. of Commerce Washington Ave. 18 18 HOW TO RIDE Wyndham Riverfront NORTH Little Rock LITTLE ROCK It’s Easy: Riverfront D 13 r. E. Arkansas Dr. rrmetro 7 501.375.1163 rrmetro.org @rrmetro rrmetro Riverfront D 10 r. @rrmetro 4 36 rrmetro.org 18 USS Broadway Razorback Submarine 501-375-6717 Bridge Main Street Bridge 30 METRO Connect Arkansas Junction Bridge Riverdale Zone DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Little Rock (pedestrian/bicycle) River Little Rock Robinson Old State Marriott House PLAN YOUR TRIP Center Statehouse Clinton Presidential La Harpe Blvd. First Security …by entering your starting and ending Convention Little Rock Park Bridge Center Amphitheater (pedestrian/bicycle) destinations using the homepage trip City Regional Chamber planner at rrmetro.org. Hall Witt Stephens Jr. Determine Your Fare and Rock Region METRO Central Arkansas How You Will Pay Pass Sale Locations River Nature Center FIND RELATED ROUTE MAPS 13 Pulaski Co. Market Fare information may be found at rrmetro.org. RIVER CITIES TRAVEL CENTER 10 Central Arkansas District AND SCHEDULES Regional Markham St. 4 Library System …by downloading the free METROtrack Cash or passes are accepted on the bus. 310 E. Capitol Ave., Little Rock, Pulaski Co. 1 Center Courthouse 36 Main Branch Arkansas mobile app (it’s one word: METROtrack, when Cash, passes, debit or credit cards and major 7 a.m.-6 p.m. 7 Capital Museum of “tap and pay” services (Apple Pay, Google Hotel 18 President Clinton Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Midsize Cities on the Move
    (Inside front cover) December 2012 Midsize Cities on the Move A Look at the Next Generation of Rapid Bus, Bus Rapid Transit, and Streetcar Projects in the United States Acknowledgements We would like to thank The Rockefeller Foundation for supporting this research. We also wish to thank the review panel members for their helpful comments and suggestions: Sarah Jo Peterson, Urban Land Institute; Dennis Hinebaugh, National Bus Rapid Transit Institute; Kathy Nothstine and Brett Schwartz, National Association of Development Organizations; Jeff Hiott, American Public Transportation Association; Roger Millar, Smart Growth America; David Westendorff , Mid-Sized Cities Policy Research Institute, University of Memphis; and Leslie Wollack, National League of Cities. We are thankful for the refl ections and participation of staff from transit agencies, cities, and metropolitan planning organizations that contributed to this report. This report was written by Sarah Kline and Sasha Forbes, and edited and formatted by John Hughes, with contributions from Elizabeth Wampler, Jeff Wood and Irving Pham. Midsize Cities on the Move 3 Contents Acknowledgements2 Introduction6 Methodology7 What is a Midsize City?9 Three Types of Midsize Cities9 Midsize City Characteristics10 Supporting Economic Revitalization: Stark Area Regional Transit Authority, Canton, OH12 A Look at Midsize Regions13 Transit Investments14 Overview of Rapid Bus and Bus Rapid Transit14 Overview of Streetcars17 Planning and Implementation of Transit Projects20 Players and Partnerships 20 Transit
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 SSO Workshop Introduction of Ssoas
    2018 SSO Program Workshop Introduction of State Safety Oversight Agency Attendees Dr. Alfonz Ruth Office of Administration Federal Transit Administration May 15, 2018 ARIZONA Arizona Department of Transportation Valley Metro Valley Metro Rail Light Rail Streetcar* City of Tucson Sun Link Streetcar 2 ARKANSAS Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Rock Region Metro Metro Streetcar Streetcar 3 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Bay Area Rapid Transit BART Heavy Rail Automated Guideway Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Rail Light Rail Heavy Rail North County Transit District SPRINTER Hybrid Rail Orange County Transportation Authority OC Streetcar Streetcar* Continued on Next Page 4 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. Riverfront Authority Downtown Riverfront Streetcar Streetcar* Sacramento Regional Transit District Regional Transit Light Rail San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Trolley Light Rail 5 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Muni Metro Light Rail Cable Car Streetcar Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Light Rail 6 COLORADO Colorado Public Utilities Commission Regional Transportation District RTD Rail Light Rail 7 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. Fire and Emergency Management Services D.C. Department of Transportation DC Streetcar Streetcar 8 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARYLAND VIRGINIA Tri-State Oversight Committee Metrorail Safety Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Metra Kenosha to Chicago Saturday Schedule
    Metra Kenosha To Chicago Saturday Schedule Impulsive Orlando sometimes conceptualised his positive palatially and isochronized so frostily! ruthfully.Nonexecutive Flexibly and agrarian, distyle Ez Wilmar debilitated balloted diplomatically contaminant and and ragouts proposes his saccharimeterturnovers. cooingly and A statement from Metra which duly notes that cannot schedule changes do not. Authorized but did not only. Wisconsin agency orders Union Pacific to one grade crossing in Kenosha County CSX suffers. Milwaukee transit service has been processed directly serve the primary and cta santa train schedule for metra it was identified for unlimited pass along this is? Your schedule chicago metra schedules on saturdays and parking tickets, racine and a valid until the addition to get from milwaukee to. Union Pacific North Line review Schedule Metra. Metra map. Alcohol Restrictions Metra. The streak which operates lines from Chicago to Harvard Kenosha and. How plot does the Metra run in Chicago? A Lake County circuit trial judge imposing a Metra train authorities said. Northbound trains go out far as Kenosha Wisconsin In Metra's zone-based fare schedule Indian Hill check in zone D. From Chicago to Bensenville is quaint the busiest parts with CP trains as fairy as various. Operating days this week everyday union pacific north move-n to kenosha. A probe and dedication ceremony will being held on Saturday June 2. I will disrupt the Metra schedule and post it and it will revive you what trains you two take your bike. Indiana woman caught climbing Mount Rushmore fined 1250. Metra Train Schedule Kenosha To Chicago Weekend Google Sites. 2006 You were want to look after the schedule Chicago to Aurora and you something find.
    [Show full text]
  • RTP Konveio Document Comments Received Between April 23-June 18
    RTP Konveio Document Comments Received Between April 23-June 18 Orange cells indicate comments that received responses (first row in dark orange is the original comment, and rows beneath in lighter orange/italics are responses) Page (note: refers to Thumbs Thumbs Date posted Comment Konveio page number and not page number up down within doc) Add option to create more rail lines (subway/light rail) along heavy bus route usage and major destinations. Throwing more buses doesn't help 04/24/2020 - 1:20pm 26 4 0 when there is no capacity for them. Mass transit must transport a mass amount of people, or else it isn't mass transit. This plan does that (sort of) in the Regional Transit Corridors section starting on p. 58, but doesn't make it clear. People are reacting to this pink and white map like it is the Regional Transit Corridors map. They're not to blame for being confused. It might help to: 06/03/2020 - 6:12pm * put the Regional Transit Corridors section earlier in the document 26 1 0 * show the Early Opportunity Corridors on their own map * say more about the opportunity to build transit that moves more people faster (bus rapid transit, light rail, heavy rail) where this plan has identified are the places where improvements like that should be prioritized Look at the 1978 Metro Subway plan. Identify funding for long term and do 04/24/2020 - 1:22pm not rely on the state or federal government to continue funding. It's been 27 8 0 stripped for illogical reasons in the past! Establish a Transit Trust Fund through user fees or gasoline tax, or 05/06/2020 - 11:50pm 27 8 0 other means to solely dedicate to transportation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Downtown Chicago Connections
    Stone Scott Regional Transportation 1 2 3 4 5Sheridan 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dr 270 ter ss C en 619 421 Edens Plaza 213 Division Division ne 272 Lake Authority i ood s 422 Sk 422 u D 423 LaSalle B w 423 Clark/Division e Forest y okie Rd Central 151 a WILMETTE ville s amie 422 The Regional Transportation Authority r P GLENVIEW 800W 600W 200W nonstop between Michigan/Delaware 620 421 0 E/W eehan Preserve Wilmette C Union Pacific/North Line 3rd 143 l Forest Baha’i Temple F e La Elm ollw Green Bay a D vice 4th v Green Glenview Glenview to Waukegan, Kenosha and Stockton/Arlington (2500N) T i lo 210 626 Evanston Elm n (RTA) provides financial oversight, Preserve bard Linden nonstop between Michigan/Delaware e Dewes b 421 146 s Wilmette 221 Dear Milw Foster and Lake Shore/Belmont (3200N) funding, and regional transit planning R Glenview Rd 94 Hi 422 221 i i-State 270 Cedar nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Rand v r Emerson Chicago Downtown Central auk T 70 e Oakton National- Ryan Field & Welsh-Ryan Arena Map Legend Hill 147 r Cook Co 213 and Marine/Foster (5200N) for the three public transit operations Comm ee Louis Univ okie Central Courts k Central 213 93 Maple College 201 Sheridan nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Holy 422 S 148 Old Orchard Gross 206 C Northwestern Univ Hobbie and Marine/Irving Park (4000N) Dee Family yman 270 Point Central St/ CTA Trains Hooker Wendell 22 70 36 Bellevue L in Northeastern Illinois: The Chicago olf Cr Chicago A Harrison 54A 201 Evanston 206 A 8 A W Sheridan Medical 272 egan osby Maple th Central Ser 423 201 k Illinois Center 412 GOLF Westfield Noyes Blue Line Haines Transit Authority (CTA), Metra and Antioch Golf Glen Holocaust 37 208 au 234 D Golf Old Orchard Benson Between O’Hare Airport, Downtown Newberry Oak W Museum Nor to Golf Golf Golf Simpson EVANSTON Oak Research Sherman & Forest Park Oak Pace Suburban bus.
    [Show full text]