Owen Whooley
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Taking on the Newly Configured Reductionist Challenge to Sociology
#2714-ASR 71:1 filename:71101-Duster 2005 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Comparative Perspectives and Competing Explanations: Taking on the Newly Configured Reductionist Challenge to Sociology Troy Duster New York University Sociology faces three important interrelated challenges in the coming decades. The first will be the increasing authority of reductionist science for which partial evidence is found in the strikingly imbalanced allocation of research funding for “causes” of wide- ranging problems—from disparities in health and educational achievement to explanations of alcoholism and violence. The second is the attendant expansion of databases on markers and processes “inside the body.” Directly but inversely related is the third challenge: new evidence that the release of already collected data sets is blocked and data collection on social and economic forces is reduced. These challenges can be confronted and addressed directly if sociologists emulate an earlier generation of sociological researchers and turn greater attention to an analysis of data collection at the site of reductionist knowledge production. This includes, for example, close scrutiny of new computer technologies assisting several DNA identification claims. It is Delivered by Ingenta to : insufficient to simply assert the arbitrarinessHarvard of the University “social construction” of these claims. Instead, the architecture of thatWed, construction 25 Oct 2006 must 22:39:39 be demonstrated. Unless that is done, competing explanations (from various disciplines) will have far greater significance on public policy and on the particular discipline’s status with public and private funding sources. he centennial of the American Sociological field in new and unchartered ways, because TAssociation (ASA) is an appropriate time to they experience their group’s perspective as step back and take a full sociohistorical view of either thwarted or ignored. -
What Is Racial Domination?
STATE OF THE ART WHAT IS RACIAL DOMINATION? Matthew Desmond Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin—Madison Mustafa Emirbayer Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin—Madison Abstract When students of race and racism seek direction, they can find no single comprehensive source that provides them with basic analytical guidance or that offers insights into the elementary forms of racial classification and domination. We believe the field would benefit greatly from such a source, and we attempt to offer one here. Synchronizing and building upon recent theoretical innovations in the area of race, we lend some conceptual clarification to the nature and dynamics of race and racial domination so that students of the subjects—especially those seeking a general (if economical) introduction to the vast field of race studies—can gain basic insight into how race works as well as effective (and fallacious) ways to think about racial domination. Focusing primarily on the American context, we begin by defining race and unpacking our definition. We then describe how our conception of race must be informed by those of ethnicity and nationhood. Next, we identify five fallacies to avoid when thinking about racism. Finally, we discuss the resilience of racial domination, concentrating on how all actors in a society gripped by racism reproduce the conditions of racial domination, as well as on the benefits and drawbacks of approaches that emphasize intersectionality. Keywords: Race, Race Theory, Racial Domination, Inequality, Intersectionality INTRODUCTION Synchronizing and building upon recent theoretical innovations in the area of race, we lend some conceptual clarification to the nature and dynamics of race and racial domination, providing in a single essay a source through which thinkers—especially those seeking a general ~if economical! introduction to the vast field of race studies— can gain basic insight into how race works as well as effective ways to think about racial domination. -
Inside: Sanderson on Reforming Theory (P. 1) • Scheff on Goffman (P. 5) • Bergesen Replies to His Critics (P
Inside: Sanderson on reforming theory (p. 1) • Scheff on Goffman (p. 5) • Bergesen replies to his critics (p. 10) • Announcements and awards (p. 14) Perspectives Newsletter of the ASA Theory Section volume 28, number 2, August 2005 Section Officers Reforming Theoretical Work in Sociology: Chair A Modest Proposal Robin Stryker (University of Minnesota) Stephen K. Sanderson Chair-Elect Karin Knorr Cetina (University of Konstanz) Indiana University of Pennsylvania Past Chair Thirty-five years ago, Alvin Gouldner (1970) predicted a coming crisis of Murray Webster Western sociology. Not only did he turn out to be right, but if anything he (University of North Carolina-Charlotte) underestimated the severity of the crisis. This crisis has been particularly Secretary-Treasurer severe in the subfield of sociology generally known as “theory.” At least Lisa Troyer, University of Iowa that is my view, as well as that of many other sociologists who are either Council theorists or who pay close attention to theory. Along with many of the most Julia Adams (Yale University) trenchant critics of contemporary theory (e.g., Jonathan Turner), I take the Uta Gerhardt (Universität Heidelberg) view that sociology in general, and sociological theory in particular, should Jack A. Goldstone (George Mason University) J. David Knottnerus (Oklahoma State University) be thoroughly scientific in outlook. Working from this perspective, I would Jane Sell (Texas A & M University) list the following as the major dimensions of the crisis currently afflicting Lynn Spillman (University of Notre Dame) theory (cf. Chafetz, 1993): 1. An excessive concern with the classical theorists. Despite Sociological Theory Editors Julia Adams (Yale University) Jeffrey Alexander’s (1987) strong argument for “the centrality of the Jeffrey Alexander (Yale University) classics,” mature sciences do not show the kind of continual concern with Ron Eyerman (Yale University) the “founding fathers” that we find in sociological theory. -
2007 Ess Book
Eastern Sociological Society New Diversity Persistent Inequality 77TH Annual Meeting Sheraton Philadelphia Center City Hotel March 15-18, 2007 GENERAL IN&ORMATION REGISTRATION Hours: Thursday, 12:00-5:00 pm &riday, 8:00 - 5:00 pm. Saturday, 8:00-5:00 pm Sunday, 8:00-10:00 am. The Registration Desk is located outside the Independence Ballroom on the Mezzanine level 1. When you register, you will be given a registration badge. 2. Badges are to be worn at all sessions and are required for admission to ESS events. 3. Registered participants may request complimentary badges for their nonmember spouses. ESS COMMONS The ESS COMMONS is on the Mezzanine level in Independence Ball Room. It includes: The Book Exhibit, which is described on the back inside cover of the program. The Message Board, where participants can leave and receive messages. The Employment Center which will be open Thursday 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM -riday 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM Saturday 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM MEETING ROOMS Most meeting rooms are on the Mezzanine level of the hotel. The Liberty Ballroom and -oyer are on the Ballroom level. Seminar Room A is on the -irst -loor. A map can be found on the back of this program. COPIES O& PAPERS The ESS does not sell or distribute papers or abstracts. Please contact authors directly to obtain copies of papers or to get further information. SESSION AND PAPER LENGTH In sessions without a discussant, presenters should take approximately 15 to 20 minutes to make their initial presentations, while in those where a discussant is listed (or which have more than four papers), presenters should plan on approximately 10 to 15 minutes and discussants the same amount of time. -
Ruha Benjamin, Ph.D
Last Updated 08/05/11 Ruha Benjamin, Ph.D. Boston University Department of Sociology and Ph: (617) 358-6280 African American Studies Program Fax: (617) 353-4837 96-100 Cummington Street Email: [email protected] Boston, Massachusetts 02215 POSITIONS Boston University, Boston, MA. Assistant Professor. July 2010-present. Department of Sociology and African American Studies Program. University of California, Los Angeles, CA. Postdoctoral Fellow. Sept 2008- Sept 2010. Center for Society and Genetics. EDUCATION PhD University of California, Berkeley, CA. Sociology, 2008. Dissertation: “Culturing Consent: Science and Democracy in the Stem Cell State.” Committee: Troy Duster (Chair), Charis Thompson, and Loic Wacquant. Qualifying Fields: Social Theory; Science; Gender, w/ emphasis on Race & Postcoloniality. MA University of California, Berkeley, CA. Sociology, 2004. BA Spelman College, Atlanta, GA. Sociology and Anthropology, 2001. IB United World College of Southern Africa, Waterford Kamhlaba. International Baccalaureate, 1996. PUBLICATIONS Benjamin, R. 2011. Organized Ambivalence: When Stem Cell Research & Sickle Cell Disease Converge. Ethnicity & Health, Vol 16, Issue 4-5: 447-463. Benjamin, R. 2009. A Lab of Their Own: Genomic Sovereignty as Postcolonial Science Policy. Policy & Society 28(4): 341-355. Benjamin, R. People’s Science: Reconstituting Bodies & Rights on the Stem Cell Frontier. Forthcoming. Benjamin, Ruha FELLOWSHIPS & GRANTS National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship , 2004-07. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Dissertation Research Fellowship, 2006-07. UC Berkeley Center for Race and Gender Dissertation Research Grant, 2007. Townsend Center Stem Cells and the Humanities Dissertation Research Grant, 2005. Ford Foundation Predoctoral Diversity Graduate Fellowship, 2002-05. UC Berkeley Graduate Opportunity Fellowship, declined, 2002. Presidential Scholarship, Spelman College, 1997-2001. -
Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Troy Duster AN ORAL HISTORY WITH TROY DUSTER Interviews conducted by Richard Cándida Smith and Nadine Wilmot In 2002 and 2003 Portions of this oral history have been sealed until January 1, 2038. Copyright © 2012 by The Regents of the University of California ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Troy Duster, dated August 29, 2002. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. -
CONTESTING the RACIAL DIVISION of LABOR from BELOW Representation and Union Organizing Among African American and Immigrant Workers1
SPECIAL FEATURE CONTESTING THE RACIAL DIVISION OF LABOR FROM BELOW Representation and Union Organizing Among African American and Immigrant Workers1 Virginia Parks School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago Dorian T. Warren Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University Abstract Popular discourse and academic scholarship both accent divisions between African American and immigrant workers. These debates most often focus on the question of job competition, positioning African Americans and immigrant workers as a priori adversaries in the labor market. We take a different tack. Drawing upon a case study of hotel workers in Chicago, we identify ways in which workers themselves challenge and bridge these divisions. Specifically, we reveal how union organizing activities, such as diverse committee representation and inclusion of diversity language in contracts, counter notions of intergroup competition in an effort to build common cause that affirms rather than denies differences. We argue that these activities represent political efforts on the part of workers to contest and even reshape the racial and ethnic division of labor, thereby revealing competition as a socially contingent and politically mediated process. Keywords: Race, Immigration, Employment, Labor, Ethnic Competition INTRODUCTION In both popular discourse and academic debate, the relationship between African American and immigrant workers is predominantly characterized as competitive and contentious. A survey conducted by the Pew Hispanic Center ~2006! found that 28% of all Americans think immigrants take native jobs. A Pew Research Survey ~Morin 2008! captured the racial inflections of perceived competition: nearly half of all African Americans believe that immigrants reduce job opportunities for African American workers. -
Good Afternoon. and on Behalf of the American Sociological Association, Welcome to the 2016 Awards Ceremony and Presidential Address
>> Good afternoon. And on behalf of the American Sociological Association, welcome to the 2016 Awards Ceremony and Presidential Address. My name is Barbara Risman, and as the current vice president, I have the honor of being your emcee this evening. I hope you are all enjoying this beautiful city of Seattle, and the 111th annual meeting of the ASA. But before we go any further, please join me as we take a moment to remember those sociologists who have passed away, and whose legacy we will always remember. [MUSIC] Thank you. We now turn to the presentation of the 2016 ASA Awards, by our awards master of ceremony, Dr. Adia Harvey Wingfield of Washington University in St. Louis. Please welcome Adia. [APPLAUSE] >> Thank you. The ASA Dissertation Award honors the best PhD dissertation from among those submitted by advisors and mentors in the discipline. Please welcome Leslie R. Hinkson as she highlights the award and the dynamic work of this year's recipient. [APPLAUSE] >> The best dissertation award goes to Michael Rodriguez-Muniz for his dissertation -- [APPLAUSE] come on, we're on a tight schedule here, people, so -- [LAUGHTER] Temporal Politics of the Future, National Latino Civil Rights Advocacy, Demographic Statistics and the Browning of America, which he completed at Brown University. This dissertation examines the construction of demographic facts about Latina/Latino population growth, the classificatory struggles waged around that process, and how Latinas/Latinos attempt to translate this demographic knowledge into political influence. In short, it is a sociological examination of the politics of demography. Employing mixed methods -- qualitative interviews, media content analysis, participant observation -- this dissertation provides two important theoretical contributions to the discipline. -
Duster, Troy. Some Social Implications of the Molecular
Some Social Implications of the Molecular Biological Revolution Troy Duster New York University A SENCER BACKGROUNDER FOR DISCUSSION AT SSI 2001 WITH NEW EPILOGUE INCLUDED, 2003 July, 2003 Partial support for this work was provide d by the National Science Foundation’s Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement Program under grant DUE-0088753. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Troy Duster is currently a professor of sociology at New York University and he also holds an appointment as Chancellor's Professor at the University of California, Berkeley. He is past chair of the Board of Directors of AAC&U, and a member of the AAAS Committee on Germ-Line Intervention. He is President-elect of the American Sociological Association. A former member of the Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences, he has served on the Committee on Social and Ethical Impact of Advances in Biomedicine, Institute of Medicine. From 1996-98, he served as chair of the joint NIH/DOE advisory committee on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project (The ELSI Working Group). He is the former director of the Institute for the Study of Social Change at the University of California at Berkeley. Troy's books and monographs include The Legislation of Morality (1970), Aims and Control of the Universities (1974), Cultural Perspectives on Biological Knowledge (co- edited with Karen Garrett, 1984), and Backdoor to Eugenics (Routledge, 1990), a book on the social implications of the new technologies in molecular biology. -
Sociological Theory
Sociological Theory http://stx.sagepub.com/ The Genomic Challenge to the Social Construction of Race Jiannbin Lee Shiao, Thomas Bode, Amber Beyer and Daniel Selvig Sociological Theory 2012 30: 67 DOI: 10.1177/0735275112448053 The online version of this article can be found at: http://stx.sagepub.com/content/30/2/67 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: American Sociological Association Additional services and information for Sociological Theory can be found at: Email Alerts: http://stx.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://stx.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Jun 18, 2012 What is This? Downloaded from stx.sagepub.com at Harvard Libraries on October 12, 2012 STX30210.1177/073527511 4480532448053Shiao et al.Sociological Theory 2012 Sociological Theory 30(2) 67 –88 The Genomic Challenge to the © American Sociological Association 2012 DOI: 10.1177/0735275112448053 Social Construction of Race http://st.sagepub.com Jiannbin Lee Shiao1, Thomas Bode2, Amber Beyer3, and Daniel Selvig4 Abstract Recent research on the human genome challenges the basic assumption that human races have no biological basis. In this article, we provide a theoretical synthesis that accepts the existence of genetic clusters consistent with certain racial classifications as well as the validity of the genomic research that has identified the clusters, without diminishing the social character of their context, meaning, production, or consequences. The first part of this article describes the social constructionist account of race as lacking biological reality, its main shortcomings, and our proposed solution: the concept of clinal classes. -
Deviance and Social Control: Marginalization, Identities and Social Justice in the United States
Soc. 152AC Andy Barlow UC Berkeley SP 2020 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: T 4-5; TH 2-3 in 460 Barrows. Sign up here Reader: Daniela Medina Email: [email protected] Deviance and Social Control: Marginalization, Identities and Social Justice in the United States This course is about and for people who are labeled “different.” Its goal is to empower people who have been marginalized by racism, xenophobia, poverty, patriarchy, homophobia, ableism and other forms of domination in the United States with the knowledge needed to combat their own subordination. The sociology of deviance provides students with analyses of marginalizing social processes and the intersecting ways these processes form a matrix of domination. It is this matrix of domination that forms the context in which people forge their own identities. This understanding that deviance is a set of social processes provides marginalized people with an important insight: that the most effective way to address the many hardships that come with marginalization is through collective resistance to the social processes that create ‘difference’ in the first place. Students in this course will learn: 1. sociological frameworks on understanding the intersecting processes by which people are made “different” 2. the socio-psychological processes by which people forge identities in the context of those experiences, and 3. Strategies, both individual and collective, that people utilize to resist marginalization. People vary greatly in their experiences of marginalization, their identities and their strategies for addressing it, but fostering collective identities that empower resistance to marginalization is essential if people are to be liberated from oppression. -
American Sociological Association Michael R
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2007 American Sociological Association Michael R. Hill University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "American Sociological Association" (2007). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 341. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/341 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R. 2007. “American Sociological Association.” Pp. 130-134 in the Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Vol. 1, edited by George Ritzer. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 130 American Sociological Association Lyman, S. M. (1998) Gunnar Myrdal's An Amer architects of what became the American ican Dilemma After a Half Century: Critics and sociological tradition and included (with Anticritics. International Journal oj Politics, Cul institutional affiliations and dates of ASS ture, and Society 12(2): 327-89. presidency): Lester Frank Ward (Brown Uni Myrdal, G. (1944) An American Dilemma: The versity, 1906-7), William Graham Sumner Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York. (Yale University, 1908-9), Franklin Henry Smith, C. V. & Killian, L. M. (1990) Sociological Giddings (Columbia University, 1910--11), Foundations of the Civil Rights Movement. In: Albion Woodbury Small (University of Chicago, Gans, H. (Ed.), Sociology in America.