DOCSLIB.ORG

Tin Locking the Violent Brain.; a Sociological Analysis of Newoselent!Fie Research on Violent and Aggressive Behaviors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

tin locking the Violent Brain.; A Sociological Analysis of Newoselent!fie Research on Violent and Aggressive Behaviors ny Oliver Eugene Rollins DISSERTATION Submitted m sartial satis faction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Sociology in the GRADUATE DIVISION ofthe iiNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. SAN FRANCISCO Copyright 2014 by Oliver Eugene Rollins ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DEDICATION I owe many people for helping me get through this process. I like to start by thanking my dissertation committee members, Howard Pinderhughes, Adele Clarke, Troy Duster, Janet Shim, and Osagie Obasogie. Howard Pinderhughes advice and guidance has been instrumental to my development as a sociologist, and I am so gracious for having him as a mentor. Howard’s door, and home, was always open when I needed advice, direction, or just someone to talk to about life and my future. He models what it takes to be both an intellectual and social activist, and I grew so much under his leadership. I have also learned so much about my abilities as a scholar from Janet Shim. She has always encouraged me, but has also pushed me to be a much better thinker, writer, and teacher. I owe so much of my intellectual development to her stellar mentorship and insights, and am truly fortunate to have her on my committee. Adele Clarke’s guidance helped provide a new opening for my thinking and work. Adele was generous with her time, advice and mentorship. Her encouragement and teaching helped develop a space for my work in science, technology and medicine studies (STMS) scholarship, and provided invaluable inspiration and direction for my future. Troy Duster’s work has been invaluable to my dissertation, as with any students of race and science, and it was truly an honor to work with Troy during this process. Troy’s knowledge and guidance helped provide clarity to this project in its early stages, and it helped lay the foundation for my future work on race, science and society. My gratitude also goes to Osagie Obasogie for being so open to listening and reading the early formulations of this project. Osagie’s advice helped me shape the direction of this project, and really helped me construct a deeper level of understanding on the relationships between law, bioscience and race. I would also like to thank the faculty and staff in Social and Behavioral Sciences, in particular Shari Dworkin’s thoughtful advice and support over the years has played a key role in my iii development into a professional. Also the hard and tireless work and support of SBS staff: Cynthia Mecardo-Scott, Brandee Woleslagle, and Regina Gudelunas. I would to thank the UCSF Graduate Division staff, and especially Dean Elizabeth Watkins. Dean Watkins belief in my abilities to succeed really helped foster my growth in the last two years, and helped set the stage for the next step in my career. I would also like to thank the Graduate Division Staff who help support me and provided great encouragement and praise during this process. I have to thank my cohort, friends, and other colleagues at UCSF who were so support of my work. Specifically, Jamie Chang, Jennifer Nazareno, Tania Werner, Kate Darling, Krista Sigurdson, Sonia Alam, Amina Massey, Christopher Hanssmann, Leslie Dubbin, Mary Gee, Yvette Cuca, and UCSF-alum Martine Lappe have all provided valuable edits, advice, thoughts, and friendship during this journey. I must thank my family, especially my mother Tonya Rollins who has always provided support and motivation throughout my life. Also my sister Shawana (Wana), father Oliver Rollins, Sr., brother Brian (Rell), Uncle Brian, Delila, Aunt Joyce, Anthony (Lil Anthony), Janice, Shacomme (Tweet), Adrian, Jamal Smith, Kenneth Fitzpatrick, and Jeremy Lewis.. As well my all my friends who have helped me so much through this journey: David Peterson (DP), Deonte, Liz, Floyd, Tonia, Stacy, Daniel, Danelle, Chris J., Emily, Ben M., Alex, Phaly, Randy, Cory, Pat, Kylie, Yasin, Rose, Mark, Kevin, Jeremey, Kodj, Ben S., and Nate R. Finally, I must give a very special Thank You to Jarmin Yeh, who for the last three years has been so encouraging, loving and supportive when I needed it the most. Please forgive me if I left anyone out, your iv support and friendship does not go unappreciated. I am truly thankful for all of you being in my life! My research was graciously funded by: National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) Research Program, Supplement to Promote Diversity Health Related Research (RO1-HG115848-03S1); NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), Initiative for Maximizing Student Diversity (IMSD) Fellowship (1-R25-GM56847) UCSF Graduate Division, Rosenberg-Hill Graduate Research Fellowship, and University of California, Center for New Racial Studies (UCCNRS) Graduate Research Grant I dedicate this dissertation to the memory of my family members and past mentors who passed away during this journey. My grandmother, Gertrude Rollins; my professors at the University of Louisville Dr. Clarence Tally and Dr. J. Blaine Hudson, and my best friend and cousin, who passed away way too soon, Ronald K. Jenkins. v Unlocking the Violent Brain: A Sociological Analysis of Neuroscientific Research on Violent and Aggressive Behaviors Oliver E. Rollins ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the social and ethical implications of neuroscientific research on violent and aggressive behaviors (VAB). It describes how neurobiological research on the determinants of VAB are formulated, structured, and contested, and how neuroscientists understand and use race in neuroscientific VAB research. This dissertation employs a multi-sited methodology, which includes four interrelated methods: historical overview of biocriminology; qualitative content analysis of neuroimaging research on VAB (1990-2012); semi-structured, in- depth interviews with neuroscientists who research VAB, and ethnographic observation/neuroscience training. One key focus of the dissertation is to examine specific critiques of the production and use of biological research on VAB and crime, and the reactions, rebuttals, and methodological steps taken by contemporary biocriminologists in an effort to address and/or resolve such objections. To help address this focus, I start with a historical examination of biomedical VAB research, which helps historically situate the dissertation by threading together specific continuities pertaining to epistemologies, methodologies, ideological debates and material consequences that underpin biological inquiries of VAB. I then provide a description of the increasing use of innovative imaging technologies in research on violence and crime, arguing that such transformations are part of larger processes of the biomedicalization of deviant behaviors. I argue that the use of neuroscience practices and technologies better positioned biocriminology to address critiques from its past. However, it has also produced newer, more vi discursive ways to construct and use biocriminology knowledges and to make and understand violent, aggressive and criminal bodies and brains. Historically, the ‘question of race’ has always been intimately tied to research on VAB, and at times has helped reinforced both racism and sexism. Contemporary biocriminologists have acknowledged such misuses, and often expressed that such practices have been both denounced and rejected by biocriminologists today. Using interviews with neuroscientists who study VAB, this dissertation provides a greater understanding of the operation and impacts of race in neuroscience research on VAB. I address the way neuroscientists use race in the design and execution of their work, and provide an overview of the potential social impacts of biocriminological knowledge on the operation of race and violence in society. Overall, this research helps elucidate current and future impacts of researching, preventing, and potentially treating VAB through biomedical technologies, and it contributes new knowledge to the longstanding conversations on race and biomedicine, including the intertwined relationships between racialized/gendered inequalities, criminal justice, and mental health. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DEDICATION........................................................................ iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. viii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER I LOCATING VIOLENCE IN THE BODY CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 FRAMEWORK FOR A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BIOCRIMINOLOGY ................ 4 What’s in a Definition ............................................................................................................. 6 Sociology of Knowledge ......................................................................................................... 9 Knowledge as a Social Product ..............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Toward an Integrative Science of the Brain and Crime

    Toward an Integrative Science of the Brain and Crime

    BioSocieties https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-019-00167-3 COMMENTARY Mind the gap: toward an integrative science of the brain and crime Eyal Aharoni1 · Nathaniel E. Anderson2 · J. C. Barnes3 · Corey H. Allen4 · Kent A. Kiehl2 © Springer Nature Limited 2019 In the recent article, Criminalizing the brain: Neurocriminology and the production of strategic ignorance, Fallin et al. (2018) argue that most neuroscientists working with antisocial populations are guilty of suppressing, obfuscating, and erasing legiti- mate social explanations for criminal behavior as part of a strategic attempt to tout their reductionist preconceptions of behavior and to advance their own professional, extra-scientifc agendas. While we applaud their call for greater inclusion of social/ contextual factors into neurocriminological research, we fnd that they overstate the case against neurocriminology and understate important eforts by this emerg- ing community to generate signifcant and cross-disciplinary contributions to the understanding of antisocial behavior. Learning to identify and avoid such mischar- acterizations is critical for the pursuit of much-needed interdisciplinary research and collaboration on the prediction, explanation, and remediation of antisocial behavior. By critically evaluating Fallin et al.’s claims, we hope to strike a conciliatory bal- ance, which is more likely to promote integration rather than antagonism between disciplines. Fallin and colleagues correctly describe biosocial criminology as an emerging discipline that integrates historically neglected biological factors and neuroscientifc methods in the study of antisocial behavior. Indeed, this paradigm has demonstrated the value of genetics (Brunner et al. 1993), physiology (Latvala et al. 2015), bio- chemistry (Coccaro et al. 1998), and neuroimaging (Anderson and Kiehl 2012) for * Eyal Aharoni [email protected] 1 Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O.
  • Introduction to Criminology

    Introduction to Criminology

    PART 1 © Nevarpp/iStockphoto/Getty Images Introduction to Criminology CHAPTER 1 Crime and Criminology. 3 CHAPTER 2 The Incidence of Crime . 35 1 © Tithi Luadthong/Shutterstock CHAPTER 1 Crime and Criminology Crime and the fear of crime have permeated the fabric of American life. —Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, U.S. Supreme Court1 Collective fear stimulates herd instinct, and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd. —Bertrand Russell2 OBJECTIVES • Define criminology, and understand how this field of study relates to other social science disciplines. Pg. 4 • Understand the meaning of scientific theory and its relationship to research and policy. Pg. 8 • Recognize how the media shape public perceptions of crime. Pg. 19 • Know the criteria for establishing causation, and identify the attributes of good research. Pg. 13 • Understand the politics of criminology and the importance of social context. Pg. 18 • Define criminal law, and understand the conflict and consensus perspectives on the law. Pg. 5 • Describe the various schools of criminological theory and the explanations that they provide. Pg. 9 of the public’s concern about the safety of their com- Introduction munities, crime is a perennial political issue that can- Crime is a social phenomenon that commands the didates for political office are compelled to address. attention and energy of the American public. When Dealing with crime commands a substantial por- crime statistics are announced or a particular crime tion of the country’s tax dollars. Criminal justice sys- goes viral, the public demands that “something be tem operations (police, courts, prisons) cost American done.” American citizens are concerned about their taxpayers over $270 billion annually.
  • Daniel Amen, MD

    Daniel Amen, MD

    INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT Volume 7 Daniel Amen, MD Foods Your Brain Will Love CONTENTS: Dr. Daniel Amen is a physician, a double board-certified Toxic Food and Brain Health psychiatrist, the founder of Amen Clinics, and a Distinguished Bigger Brain, Better Brain Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association. Dr. Amen is The Dinosaur Syndrome the lead researcher on the world’s largest brain imaging and Unhealthy Relationships with Food brain rehabilitation study on professional football players, which Supplements For the Brain demonstrated significant brain damage in a high percentage Eat From the Rainbow of retired players, but also the possibility for rehabilitation. Dr. Unnecessary Dairy Amen’s twelve popular television shows about the brain have The Daniel Plan raised more than 55 million dollars for public television. His ten The Optimal Diet for Alzheimer’s New York Times bestselling books include Change Your Brain, Family History of Sweets Change Your Life, and The Amen Solution. Dr. Amen will share A Legacy of Healthy Eating what tens of thousands of brain scans have taught him about how you can prevent dementia and optimize your brain’s health. Connect at: AmenClinics.com FoodRevolutionSummit.org © 2018 Food Revolution Network, Inc. All rights reserved. INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT Volume 7 Daniel Amen, MD Ocean Robbins: Welcome to the Food Revolution Summit, where we explore how you can heal your body and your world — with food. This is Ocean Robbins, and I am joined by my dad and colleague, John Robbins, in welcoming our guest Dr. Daniel Amen. If you love your brain and you want to stay sharp at every stage of your life, you’re gonna love this interview.
  • A Conceptual Overview of Deviance and Its Implication to Mental Health

    A Conceptual Overview of Deviance and Its Implication to Mental Health

    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org || Volume 2 Issue 12 || December. 2013 || PP.01-09 A Conceptual Overview of Deviance and Its Implication to Mental Health: a Bio psychosocial Perspective Nalah, Augustine Bala1, Ishaya, Leku Daniel2 1-Behavioural Health Unit, Psychology Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi – Nigeria; 2- Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi –Nigeria; ABSTRACT: This research paper is a conceptual overview of deviance and its implications to mental health and well-being. The study conceptualized and theorized deviance and mental health through the sociological, biological, and psychological dimensions. All theories agreed that deviant behaviour begins from childhood through old-age. This suggests a deviation from behaviour appropriate to the laws or norms and values of a particular society. This makes deviance to be relative, depending on the society and individual. Mental illness and Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder (PTSD) as the inflicted or labelled deviants are unable to cope. The behavioural aftermath of PTSD typically involves increased aggression and drug and alcohol abuse, which could lead to anxiety, depression, insomnia, plus memory and cognitive impairments or mental disorder. The paper recommends policymakers in collaboration with behavioural health specialists (Clinical psychologists), should focus on developing and implementing social learning preventive and reformative programmes through role playing, behaviour modification, social support system, and peer and group psychotherapy among others. Keywords: Conduct disorder, deviance, mental health, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, psychological trauma, I. INTRODUCTION The social understanding of the study of deviance and crime examine cultural norms; how they change over time, how they are enforced, and what happens to individuals and societies when norms are broken.
  • Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory

    Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory

    Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory Lombroso, Cesare: The Criminal Man Contributors: Francis T. Cullen & Pamela Wilcox Print Pub. Date: 2010 Online Pub. Date: November 23, 2010 Print ISBN: 9781412959186 Online ISBN: 9781412959193 DOI: 10.4135/9781412959193 Print pages: 561-566 This PDF has been generated from SAGE knowledge. Please note that the pagination of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book. SAGE Copyright ©2013 SAGE knowledge 10.4135/9781412959193.n155 University of Cincinnati Cesare Lombroso, who lived from 1835 to 1909, was an Italian physician best known for his studies [p. 561 ↓ ] in the field of criminal anthropology and his theories of the “criminal type”—an individual whose physical structure and psychological characteristics possessed the atavistic and degenerative traits that differentiated him from the civilized, socially well-adjusted human. Lombroso is also remembered for shifting the focus of legal thinking from crime to the criminal, and his theory on the constitutional and hereditary roots of criminal conduct. His theories have heavily influenced developments in criminology throughout both Europe and the United States, although they have been challenged and often discredited. His most famous work, L'uomo delinquente (The Criminal Man), considered by many historians the founding text of modern criminology, went through five editions between 1876 and 1897, and during Lombroso's lifetime was translated into French, German, Russian, and Spanish. Each edition contained additional data, observations, and illustrations: the first edition was a reasonably short volume of 255 pages; the last edition consisted of four volumes and was 1,902 pages long. Short Biography Lombroso, born Ezechia Marco, came from a Jewish family in Verona that had lived in North Italy for generations.
  • Neuroscience, Law, and Ethics T

    Neuroscience, Law, and Ethics T

    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 65 (2019) 101459 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Law and Psychiatry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijlawpsy Introduction Neuroscience, Law, and Ethics T In his influential Hardwired Behavior: What Neuroscience Reveals concerning the relevance of neurosciences to the law, especially crim- about Morality (2005), Laurence Tancredi combined neuroscience, inal law.” (Meynen, 2016, p. 3, Meynen, 2014; Morse & Roskies, 2013; psychology, philosophy, legal theory and clinical cases to insightfully Glenn & Raine, 2014; Chandler, 2018). One example is the use of examine the role of brain structure and function in moral behavior. neuroimaging to support behavioral evidence in judging whether a Analyzing how neurobiology shapes reasoning and decision-making, he person performing a criminal act met cognitive and volitional condi- discussed questions such as whether or to what extent we have free will tions necessary for criminal responsibility. Functional imaging re- and can be morally and criminally responsible for our actions. Is our cording abnormal activity in prefrontal-limbic pathways may indicate behavior hardwired and thus determined by the brain? Is free will an impaired cognitive and emotional processing and impaired capacity to illusion? Can mental content be explained entirely in terms of neural deliberate and consider the consequences of what one does or fails to content? If the brain influences but does not determine behavior, then do. This and other forms of imaging may eventually offer a more fine- how much of what we think and do is up to us? In his new book, grained account of impaired inhibitory mechanisms in the brain.
  • Taking on the Newly Configured Reductionist Challenge to Sociology

    Taking on the Newly Configured Reductionist Challenge to Sociology

    #2714-ASR 71:1 filename:71101-Duster 2005 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Comparative Perspectives and Competing Explanations: Taking on the Newly Configured Reductionist Challenge to Sociology Troy Duster New York University Sociology faces three important interrelated challenges in the coming decades. The first will be the increasing authority of reductionist science for which partial evidence is found in the strikingly imbalanced allocation of research funding for “causes” of wide- ranging problems—from disparities in health and educational achievement to explanations of alcoholism and violence. The second is the attendant expansion of databases on markers and processes “inside the body.” Directly but inversely related is the third challenge: new evidence that the release of already collected data sets is blocked and data collection on social and economic forces is reduced. These challenges can be confronted and addressed directly if sociologists emulate an earlier generation of sociological researchers and turn greater attention to an analysis of data collection at the site of reductionist knowledge production. This includes, for example, close scrutiny of new computer technologies assisting several DNA identification claims. It is Delivered by Ingenta to : insufficient to simply assert the arbitrarinessHarvard of the University “social construction” of these claims. Instead, the architecture of thatWed, construction 25 Oct 2006 must 22:39:39 be demonstrated. Unless that is done, competing explanations (from various disciplines) will have far greater significance on public policy and on the particular discipline’s status with public and private funding sources. he centennial of the American Sociological field in new and unchartered ways, because TAssociation (ASA) is an appropriate time to they experience their group’s perspective as step back and take a full sociohistorical view of either thwarted or ignored.
  • Editoria Our Decision in This Respect

    Editoria Our Decision in This Respect

    place the head of Lombroso on the cover of this issue of Criminal Justice Matters and to furnish the ensuing pages with further Lombrosian imagery. Three factors influenced editoria our decision in this respect. First, many continue to practice criminology within the criminology and its uses confines of the positivist project — albeit in more sophisticated ways. For these academics and practitioners, the The cover of this issue presents a somewhat gruesome cover could be interpreted as reflecting the preservation of photograph of the pickled head of Cesare Lombroso, such thinking throughout the twentieth century. Second, others preserved for all to see in the Museum of Criminal have been critical of the positivist project, both past and Anthropology — Cesare Lombroso in Turin. As many of our present — indeed many of the contributors to this present readers will know, Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909) is the issue map a somewhat fragmentary picture of the contours of founder of 'a science of the criminal' if not of the science of much criminological thought. In doing so, these contributions criminology. Nevertheless, the influence of his scuola positiva raise a number of questions about the positivist enterprise in on the development of a criminological enterprise has been general and its achievements in particular. For them, the enormous. preserved image of Lombroso's head will symbolise the For those readers unable to recall the work of Lombroso, a preservation only of external features rather than integral brief review will have to suffice. The changing nineteenth thought. Third, others have expressed a desire to move beyond century saw advances in the physical and natural sciences the boundaries of modern criminological thought and to alongside external social and economic developments; within acknowledge various hitherto neglected avenues for future this context Lombroso and his colleagues Ferri and Garofalo discussion and analysis.
  • What Is Racial Domination?

    What Is Racial Domination?

    STATE OF THE ART WHAT IS RACIAL DOMINATION? Matthew Desmond Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin—Madison Mustafa Emirbayer Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin—Madison Abstract When students of race and racism seek direction, they can find no single comprehensive source that provides them with basic analytical guidance or that offers insights into the elementary forms of racial classification and domination. We believe the field would benefit greatly from such a source, and we attempt to offer one here. Synchronizing and building upon recent theoretical innovations in the area of race, we lend some conceptual clarification to the nature and dynamics of race and racial domination so that students of the subjects—especially those seeking a general (if economical) introduction to the vast field of race studies—can gain basic insight into how race works as well as effective (and fallacious) ways to think about racial domination. Focusing primarily on the American context, we begin by defining race and unpacking our definition. We then describe how our conception of race must be informed by those of ethnicity and nationhood. Next, we identify five fallacies to avoid when thinking about racism. Finally, we discuss the resilience of racial domination, concentrating on how all actors in a society gripped by racism reproduce the conditions of racial domination, as well as on the benefits and drawbacks of approaches that emphasize intersectionality. Keywords: Race, Race Theory, Racial Domination, Inequality, Intersectionality INTRODUCTION Synchronizing and building upon recent theoretical innovations in the area of race, we lend some conceptual clarification to the nature and dynamics of race and racial domination, providing in a single essay a source through which thinkers—especially those seeking a general ~if economical! introduction to the vast field of race studies— can gain basic insight into how race works as well as effective ways to think about racial domination.
  • Stress Physiology and Behavior Problems

    Stress Physiology and Behavior Problems

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Stress Physiology and Behavior Problems Ruiyun Chen University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Chen, Ruiyun, "Stress Physiology and Behavior Problems" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1649. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1649 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1649 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stress Physiology and Behavior Problems Abstract Understanding childhood externalizing problems is informative in designing interventions and reducing crime in adulthood because childhood aggression is one of the best predictors for later antisocial behavior. Childhood externalizing problems are typically studied with internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety) given their consistent correlation and seemingly opposite behavior manifestations. This dissertation examined both spectrums of behavior problems to advance our etiological understanding. Adversity and stress have been a focus in criminology research but few studies have incorporated stress physiology, the biological underpinning of how individuals deal with adversity. This dissertation comprised three papers testing the linkage of stress physiology to behavior problems. I examined how the two components of the stress system, namely the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the autonomic nervous system (ANS), interact with each other, and together interact with harsh discipline in influencing externalizing and internalizing problems. Data were drawn from a community sample of 11-12 year old children (N = 446). Saliva samples were collected in the initial assessment and later assayed for cortisol (HPA) and salivary alpha-amylase (sAA; ANS).
  • The New BRAIN

    The New BRAIN

    SPECIAL EDITION The New BRAIN MACLEAN’S EBOOK Contents Introduction Join us for a giant brainstorming session on what the world’s neuroscience superstars are keeping top of mind The glia club Once dismissed as ‘glue,’ glial cells, neuron’s little brother, have become the lodestone of brain research. But is it a good idea for scientists to herd in one direction? Charlie Gillis How to build a brain A philosopher and engineer has created the most complex simulated brain in the world. On $30,000 a year. Nick Taylor-Vaisey Mad beauty A conceptual photographer dusts off the jars of a brain collection from a Texas mental hospital David Graham They grow up so fast The latest research on a baby’s remarkable brain development, from recognizing right and wrong to the gift of memory Rosemary Counter Gone baby gone Why don’t we remember anything from earliest childhood? It’s called infantile amnesia. Emma Teitel MACLEAN’S EBOOK THE NEW BRAIN Memory and gender Emma Teitel The young and the restless No one knows why autistic kids are often night owls, but their parents can take heart: science is looking at some biological causes based in the brain Katherine DeClerq Crying out for attention How one psychologist is offering hope to parents worried about the stigma, safety and side effects of ADHD medication Hannah Hoag Mind the age gap Previously dismissed as lesser or defective, new research is revealing that the teenage brain is just as powerful as any adult’s Rosemary Counter No brawn, no brains Genetics may decide your upper and lower limits for cognitive
  • The Neuroscience and Law Center Presents CUTTING-EDGE DEVELOPMENTS in NEUROSCIENCE and LAW February 25, 2020 8:30 A.M

    The Neuroscience and Law Center Presents CUTTING-EDGE DEVELOPMENTS in NEUROSCIENCE and LAW February 25, 2020 8:30 A.M

    Fordham Law | CLE The Neuroscience and Law Center presents CUTTING-EDGE DEVELOPMENTS IN NEUROSCIENCE AND LAW February 25, 2020 8:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. Fordham Law School Skadden Conference Center Sponsors: The Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, The Flomenhaft Law Firm, PLLC 8:30 – 9 a.m. 12:50 – 1:50 p.m. Registration and breakfast Lunch 9 – 9:15 a.m. 1:50 – 3:30 p.m. Welcome The Ethics of Trauma, Aging, and Brain Irregularities Matthew Diller, J.D. Adam M. Brickman, Ph.D. Dean and Paul Fuller Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law Professor of Neuropsychology Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain Deborah W. Denno, Ph.D., J.D. Department of Neurology Arthur A. McGivney Professor of Law, Founding Director, Neuroscience Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Law Center, Fordham University School of Law Columbia University 9:15 – 10:55 a.m. Natalie Hiromi Brito, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Ethics and the Brain: How Environment Affects Department of Applied Psychology Behavior and Brain Development New York University Martha J. Farah, Ph.D. Helen S. Mayberg, M.D. Walter H. Annenberg Professor in Natural Sciences Director, Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics Director, Center for Neuroscience & Society Professor, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry and Neuroscience University of Pennsylvania Mount Sinai Professor of Neurotherapeutics Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Paul W. Glimcher, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Neuroscience and Physiology Donald W. Pfaff, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Psychiatry Professor and Head of Laboratory NYU School of Medicine Neurobiology and Behavior The Rockefeller University Yasmin L.