DOCSLIB.ORG

SWRD Bandaranaike: Altered the Course of Sri Lankan Politics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SWRD Bandaranaike: Altered the Course of Sri Lankan Politics SWRD Bandaranaike: Altered the Course of Sri Lankan Politics 27 May 2020 By Srimal Fernando and Abhishekh Ganesh The year 1951 would change the course of Sri Lankan political history when a split occurred inside the United National Party (UNP). In a astonishing political move SWRD Bandaranaike left his cabinet post and crossed the floor in the Parliament to the opposition. Simultaneously his prevalence started to ascend inside the Sri Lankan masses as Bandaranaike launched a centre-leftist political party called Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP). Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP). This is not really the entire story be that as it may. .Since the political change, a slow but increasing tide of blue wave began when the SLFP membership increased compared to the centre right United National Party (UNP) . This background paved the way for Sinhala nationalists such as S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, D.A. Rajapaksa and Philip Gunewardena to form an alliance in order to topple the UNP government that was ruling the nation from the time of independence. In Sri Lanka voters do not always behave as predicted and by 1956 the chances of the SLFP backed leftist government coming to power remained very high. On the other hand elections remained a matter of speculation but there was no indication that the United National Party (UNP) had lost any influence with the rural masses of the country. Prime Minister Bandaranaike’s assassination on September 26, 1959 by a Buddhist priest Somarama Thero once again changed Ceylon’s political discourse and its foreign policy directions. The assassination of SWRD Bandaranaike in 1959 led to a decade where the political thinking was divided between the Socialist leaning party and the Western thinking liberal party . More over Sri Lankan voters expectations about Sirimavo Bandaranaikerose within no time after the unfortunate assassination of her husband S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike in 1959. On 21 July, 1960, Sirimavo Bandaranaike became the first ever woman Prime Minister of Sri Lanka and the world . Over the years the pragmatic policies implemented by the SLFP have gone much further than the policies that Bandaranaike envisioned . Nonetheless the SLFP has come long path since 1957 opening the hallways of political capacity to Former Sri Lankan Presidents like Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, Mahinda Rajapaksa, and Maithripala Sirisena.The party policies are today inadequate to deliver Sri Lankan citizen’s interests. The policy makers of the SLFP must craft a new strategy to tackle the domestic voter base and the international community in finding a future path to become a formidable party in taking the island nation to the next level of socio economic growth. Foreign Policy Having succeeded in their mission, the SLFP came into power in 1956. SWRD Bandaranaike became the new Prime Minister with a Sinhala nationalist base and was backed by what were known as the five forces: the clergy; teachers; physicians; farmers and the working class. The general election in April 1956 brought a sea change in the country’s foreign policy and was a significant departure from the previous regime’s pro- Western policy. Premier Bandaranaike’s approach to foreign policy was that the proper position for Sri Lanka is to follow a neutral policy and non- aligned with any power bloc. On this basis he wanted to be “friends of all, enemies of non.” A notable feature in Bandaranaike’s policy soon after becoming Prime Minister was his request that the British withdraw their bases in Sri Lanka. As a result, the government of UK transferred to Sri Lanka the Royal Base in Trincomalee and the Air Force Station at Katunayake. At the Commonwealth Prime Minister’s conference in 1956, Bandaranaike declared his intent of making Sri Lanka a republic while remaining in the Commonwealth, as India had. Thus, foreign policy was taking on a new dimension of anti- colonist notion amplified by the Bandaranaike – Nehru joint communiqué of May 1957 expressing concern about “development in some parts of Western Asia” and that people of those parts should be left free to solve their own issues. Non Aligned Movement (NAM) In contrast to the former UNP regime, the SLFP government’s foreign relations now tilted towards the Soviet Union and China. Bandaranaike and his counterpart in India, Indian Prime Minister Nehru were not only close friends but also shared an identical view on world affairs. This relationship helped bridge the gap . However, Nehru and Bandaranaike championed the concept of the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) which brought together mostly developing nations who preferred to stay away from either power bloc. Furthermore, due to Bandaranaike’s close association with the socialist bloc, China became a close friend of Sri Lanka for the first time. On the Foreign Policy front S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, revised strong bilateral connections with India and China and his policies remained important for Non Aligned Movement (NAM) nations and for India and China ties with Sri Lanka. The Impacts of home-grown Issues In keeping with his election promises to the majority Sinhalese who brought him into power, he passed the Sinhala only Act in 1956 making Sinhalese the official language of the country. Hence, this new Act was vehemently opposed by the minority Tamils leading to riots. Meanwhile the Tamil Federal Party led by S.J.V. Chelvanayakam began to demand for minority rights. Chelvanayakam pressed for devolved power within a federalist structure for the Northern and Eastern provinces of Ceylon where most of the minority communities live. This demand was strongly opposed by Sinhalese Nationalists. Bandarainake realizing the gravity of the impact of the official languages Act attempted to diffuse the prevailing hostiles between the two communities. He made a pact with Chelvanayakam in April 1958, allowing for the use of Tamil as the official language in Tamil speaking Provinces. This pact was strongly opposed by the UNP led by the then Finance Minister J.R. Jayewardene which led to Bandaranaike nullifying the pact. What followed were the first ethnic riots since independence known as the 58 riots targeting the minority Tamil community. At that time Ceylonese (Sri Lankan) society found itself ill prepared to deal with the troublesome issues. Conclusion As a nation Sri Lanka is moving away from a conflict past to a progressive future. There is hope that political leaders and members of the SLFP will learn from their mistakes and finally establish a unified leadership. In Sri Lanka politics remained unpredictable. It is obvious that SLFPs expansion was a reflection on the principals laid sixty eight years ago by SWRD Bandaranaike that altered the political course of Sri Lanka in a new direction. Even today nearly seven decades later, SWRD and Sirimavo Bandaranaike’s names are remembered with profound respect among the thousands of Sri Lankans and Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) supporters . The SLFP must produce simple solutions to simple problems that is affecting the stability of Sri Lanka In years ahead the role of SLFP leadership will play an increasingly significant role in unifying the nations multi-cultural spirit. Also the late Bandaranaike’s realistic policies counted very much for the South Asian island nation, the region and to the world at large. Srimal Fernando is a Doctoral Fellow at Jindal School of International Affairs (JSIA), India and Advisor / Global Editor of Diplomatic Society for South Africa. He is the winner of the 2018/2019 ‘Best Journalist of the Year’ award in South Africa, and has been the recipient of GCA Media Award for 2016.In the field of politics, and Policy affairs, Fernando is a specialist, with over ten years of first hand experience in Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Abhishekh Ganesh is a Social Entrepreneur and an MBA Scholar from Jindal Global Business School (JGBS), India. He is the recipient of the Google Start-up Weekend - Best Start-up Idea 2018 award and was selected as a representation from India to present his social venture at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI U Exhibition) 2018 in the University of Chicago, USA which was presided by Former President Bill Clinton and Secretary Hillary Clinton .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SASANASIRITISSA THERO and OTHERS V. P.A. DE SILVA, CHIEF INSPECTOR, C.I.D
    356 Sri Lanka Law Reports (1989) 2 Sri LR SASANASIRITISSA THERO AND OTHERS v. P.A. DE SILVA, CHIEF INSPECTOR, C.I.D. AND OTHERS SUPREME COURT H.A.G DE SILVA, J „ BANDARANAYAKE,. J. AND KULATUNGA, J. S.C. APPLICATIONS 13/88, 14/88 and 15/88 MAY 17, 18, 19, 29 & 30, 1989 Fundamental Rights - Mala tide arrest and detention tor political reasons - Articles 12(1), 12(2), 13(1), 13(2) and 14(1) of the Constitution - Time-base At the Katana Mahapola celebration held at Harischandra Vidyalaya a bomb explosion took place to disrupt the procession and two hand grenades were thrown - one of which struck a student and rolled on to the ground without exploding a few yards from the Hon. Amarasiri, Minister of Trade and Hon. Wijayapala Mendis, Minister of Textile Industries (5th respondent) and the others exploded causing injuries to the 6th respondent (the 5th respondent's Public Relations Officer). The 1st petitioner is the patron of the SLFP and a prominent party worker opposed to the Government while the 2nd. and 3rd petitioners were his van driver and aide respectively. The 1st petitioner’s van driven by the 2nd petitioner had been about 75 yards away from the place where the bomb exploded. The van had come to the town to change tyres and neither the 2nd or 3rd' petitioner's had anything to do with the incident. The 1 st petitioner had gone, to the house of one Justin Silva and with him gone to the temple but came to know on the day of the incident itself (9.10.87) that his driver and aide • had been taken into custody.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration and Morality Amongst Sri Lankan Catholics
    UNLIKELY COSMPOLITANS: MIGRATION AND MORALITY AMONGST SRI LANKAN CATHOLICS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Bernardo Enrique Brown August, 2013 © 2013 Bernardo Enrique Brown ii UNLIKELY COSMOPOLITANS: MIGRATION AND MORALITY AMONGST SRI LANKAN CATHOLICS Bernardo Enrique Brown, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2013 Sri Lankan Catholic families that successfully migrated to Italy encountered multiple challenges upon their return. Although most of these families set off pursuing very specific material objectives through transnational migration, the difficulties generated by return migration forced them to devise new and creative arguments to justify their continued stay away from home. This ethnography traces the migratory trajectories of Catholic families from the area of Negombo and suggests that – due to particular religious, historic and geographic circumstances– the community was able to develop a cosmopolitan attitude towards the foreign that allowed many of its members to imagine themselves as ―better fit‖ for migration than other Sri Lankans. But this cosmopolitanism was not boundless, it was circumscribed by specific ethical values that were constitutive of the identity of this community. For all the cosmopolitan curiosity that inspired people to leave, there was a clear limit to what values and practices could be negotiated without incurring serious moral transgressions. My dissertation traces the way in which these iii transnational families took decisions, constantly navigating between the extremes of a flexible, rootless cosmopolitanism and a rigid definition of identity demarcated by local attachments. Through fieldwork conducted between January and December of 2010 in the predominantly Catholic region of Negombo, I examine the work that transnational migrants did to become moral beings in a time of globalization, individualism and intense consumerism.
    [Show full text]
  • Update UNHCR/CDR Background Paper on Sri Lanka
    NATIONS UNIES UNITED NATIONS HAUT COMMISSARIAT HIGH COMMISSIONER POUR LES REFUGIES FOR REFUGEES BACKGROUND PAPER ON REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS FROM Sri Lanka UNHCR CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION AND RESEARCH GENEVA, JUNE 2001 THIS INFORMATION PAPER WAS PREPARED IN THE COUNTRY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS UNIT OF UNHCR’S CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION AND RESEARCH ON THE BASIS OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND COMMENT, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE UNHCR STATISTICAL UNIT. ALL SOURCES ARE CITED. THIS PAPER IS NOT, AND DOES NOT, PURPORT TO BE, FULLY EXHAUSTIVE WITH REGARD TO CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRY SURVEYED, OR CONCLUSIVE AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY PARTICULAR CLAIM TO REFUGEE STATUS OR ASYLUM. ISSN 1020-8410 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................. 3 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 4 2 MAJOR POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SRI LANKA SINCE MARCH 1999................ 7 3 LEGAL CONTEXT...................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 International Legal Context ................................................................................................. 17 3.2 National Legal Context........................................................................................................ 19 4 REVIEW OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sirimavo Bandaranaike Ranasinghe Premadasa And
    sc Sirimavo Bandaranaike v. Ranasinghe Premadasa and Another 1 SIRIMAVO BANDARANAIKE v. RANASINGHE PREMADASA AND CHANDANANDA DE SILVA SUPREME COURT G. P. S. DE SILVA, C.J. P. RAMANATHAN, J. S. B. GOONEWARDENE, J. P. R. P. PERERA, J. AND A. S. WIJETUNGA, J. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 1989 19 JUNE 1989 TO 30 JUNE 1992 Presidential Election Petition - General intimidation - Non-compliance with provisions o f the Presidential Elections Act No. 15 of 1981 - Failure to conduct a free and fair election in accordance with the provisions of the Presidential Elections Act - Presidential Elections Act No. 15 of 1981 ss. 91 (a), 91 (b) - Interpretation ofs. 91 (a) - Burden o f pro of-ss. 101, 102 Evidence Ordinance. The election to the office of President of Sri Lanka was held on 19 December 1988. There were three candidates namely Sirimavo R. D. Bandaranaike (Petitioner) of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), Ranasinghe Premadasa (1st respondent) of the United National Party (UNP) and Oswin Abeygunasekera of the Sri Lanka Mahajana Party (SLMP). The petitioner received 2289860 or 44.95% of the votes, the 1st respondent 2569199 or 50.43% of the votes and Abeygunasekera 235719 or 4.63% of the votes. The first respondent won by a Majority of 279339 votes. Of the eligible voters 55.32% voted. The 2nd respondent as Commissioner of Elections declared the 1st respondent elected to the office of President of Sri Lanka. The petitioner by petition filed on 09 January 1989 challenged the election of the 1st respondent on the following grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka
    Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka Nirekha De Silva Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka Copyright© WISCOMP Foundation for Universal Responsibility Of His Holiness The Dalai Lama, New Delhi, India, 2006. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by WISCOMP Foundation for Universal Responsibility Of His Holiness The Dalai Lama Core 4A, UGF, India Habitat Centre Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India This initiative was made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation. The views expressed are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect those of WISCOMP or the Foundation for Universal Responsibility of HH The Dalai Lama, nor are they endorsed by them. 2 Contents Acknowledgements 5 Preface 7 Introduction 9 Methodology 11 List of Abbreviations 13 Civil War in Sri Lanka 14 Army Women 20 LTTE Women 34 Peace and the process of Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration 45 Human Needs and Human Rights in Reintegration 55 Psychological Barriers in Reintegration 68 Social Adjustment to Civil Life 81 Available Mechanisms 87 Recommendations 96 Directory of Available Resources 100 • Counselling Centres 100 • Foreign Recruitment 102 • Local Recruitment 132 • Vocational Training 133 • Financial Resources 160 • Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s) 163 Bibliography 199 List of People Interviewed 204 3 4 Acknowledgements I am grateful to Dr. Meenakshi Gopinath and Sumona DasGupta of Women in Security, Conflict Management and Peace (WISCOMP), India, for offering the Scholar for Peace Fellowship in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Assessment
    SRI LANKA COUNTRY ASSESSMENT October 2002 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Sri Lanka October 2002 CONTENTS 1. Scope of Document 1.1 - 1.4 2. Geography 2.1 - 2.4 3. Economy 3.1 - 3.2 4. History 4.1 - 4.79 - Independence to 1994 4.1 - 4.10 - 1994 to the present 4.11 - 4.50 - The Peace Process January 2000 - October 4.51 - 4.79 2002 5. State Structures 5.1 - 5.34 The Constitution 5.1 - 5.2 - Citizenship and Nationality 5.3 - 5.4 Political System 5.5. - 5.7 Judiciary 5.8 - 5.10 Legal Rights/Detention 5.11 - 5.21 - Death penalty 5.22 - 5.23 Internal Security 5.24 - 5.25 Prisons and Prison Conditions 5.26 Military Service 5.27 - 5.28 Medical Services 5.29 - 5.33 Educational System 5.34 6. Human Rights 6.1 - 6.168 6.A Human Rights Issues 6.1 - 6.51 Overview 6.1 - 6.4 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.5 - 6.8 - Treatment of journalists 6.9 - 6.11 Freedom of Religion - Introduction 6.12 - Buddhists 6.13 - Hindus 6.14 - Muslims 6.15 - 6.18 - Christians 6.19 - Baha'is 6.20 Freedom of Assembly & Association 6.21 - Political Activists 6.22 - 6.26 Employment Rights 6.27 - 6.32 People Trafficking 6.33 - 6.35 Freedom of Movement 6.36 - 6.43 - Immigrants and Emigrants Act 6.44 - 6.51 6.B Human Rights - Specific Groups 6.52 - 6.151 Ethnic Groups - Tamils and general Human Rights Issues 6.52 - 6.126 - Up-country Tamils 6.127 - 6.130 - Indigenous People 6.131 Women 6.132 - 6.139 Children 6.140 - 6.145 - Child Care Arrangements 6.146 - 6.150 Homosexuals 6.151 6.C Human Rights - Other Issues
    [Show full text]
  • Majoritarian Politics in Sri Lanka: the ROOTS of PLURALISM BREAKDOWN
    Majoritarian Politics in Sri Lanka: THE ROOTS OF PLURALISM BREAKDOWN Neil DeVotta | Wake Forest University April 2017 I. INTRODUCTION when seeking power; and the sectarian violence that congealed and hardened attitudes over time Sri Lanka represents a classic case of a country all contributed to majoritarianism. Multiple degenerating on the ethnic and political fronts issues including colonialism, a sense of Sinhalese when pluralism is deliberately eschewed. At Buddhist entitlement rooted in mytho-history, independence in 1948, Sinhalese elites fully economic grievances, politics, nationalism and understood that marginalizing the Tamil minority communal violence all interacting with and was bound to cause this territorialized community stemming from each other, pushed the island to eventually hit back, but they succumbed to towards majoritarianism. This, in turn, then led to ethnocentrism and majoritarianism anyway.1 ethnic riots, a civil war accompanied by terrorism What were the factors that motivated them to do that ultimately killed over 100,000 people, so? There is no single explanation for why Sri democratic regression, accusations of war crimes Lanka failed to embrace pluralism: a Buddhist and authoritarianism. revival in reaction to colonialism that allowed Sinhalese Buddhist nationalists to combine their The new government led by President community’s socio-economic grievances with Maithripala Sirisena, which came to power in ethnic and religious identities; the absence of January 2015, has managed to extricate itself minority guarantees in the Constitution, based from this authoritarianism and is now trying to on the Soulbury Commission the British set up revive democratic institutions promoting good prior to granting the island independence; political governance and a degree of pluralism.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Print Page Close Window
    World Directory of Minorities Asia and Oceania MRG Directory –> Sri Lanka –> Sri Lanka Overview Print Page Close Window Sri Lanka Overview Environment Peoples History Governance Current state of minorities and indigenous peoples Environment The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (formerly known as Ceylon) comprises one large, compact island and several islets, separated from the Indian subcontinent by a strip of sea which at its narrowest point is 40 kilometres and centrally located in the Indian Ocean, lying off the southern tip of India. Sri Lanka is strategically placed in the Indian Ocean, alongside major trading routes from the Far East, Europe as well as from Africa. In contrast to other South Asian countries, Sri Lanka's population has not shown an excessive growth since independence and the country boasts of high social development indicators, including a high literacy rate (by some accounts 96 per cent). Peoples Main languages: Sinhala (official and national language), Tamil (national language), English Main religions: Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Christianity Minority and indigenous groups include Sri Lankan Tamils(12.7%) (1981), Indian Tamil (5.5%) (1981) Muslims(7.4%) (1981), Veddhas2,000 (1981 Census), and Burghers (0.3%) (1981). A census was conducted in 2001 however it was not carried out in 7 districts in the conflict area which are all minority populous areas. Sri Lanka has a plural society. The majority group, the Sinhalese, speak a distinctive language (Sinhala) related to the Indo-Aryan tongues of north India, and are mainly Buddhist. There are two groups of Tamils: ‘Sri Lankan Tamils' (also known as ‘Ceylon' or ‘Jaffna' Tamils) are the descendants of Tamil-speaking groups who migrated from south India many centuries ago; and ‘Up Country Tamils' (also known as ‘Indian' or ‘estate' Tamils), who are descendants of comparatively recent immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodating Minorities Into Sri Lanka's Post-Civil War State
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 9 No 6 November 2020 ISSN 2281-3993 www.richtmann.org . Research Article © 2020 Fazil et.al.. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Accommodating Minorities into Sri Lanka’s Post-Civil War State System: Government Initiatives and Their Failure Mansoor Mohamed Fazil1* Mohamed Anifa Mohamed Fowsar1 Vimalasiri Kamalasiri1 Thaharadeen Fathima Sajeetha1 Mohamed Bazeer Safna Sakki1 1Department of Political Science, Faculty of Arts and Culture, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, University Park, Oluvil, Sri Lanka *Corresponding Author DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0132 Abstract Many observers view the defeat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in May 2009 as a significant turning point in the protracted ethnic conflict that was troubling Sri Lanka. The armed struggle and the consequences of war have encouraged the state and society to address the group rights of ethnic minorities and move forward towards state reconstitution. The Tamil minority and international community expect that the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) must introduce inclusive policies as a solution to the ethnic conflict. They believe the state should take measures to avoid another major contestation through the lessons learned from the civil war. The study is a qualitative analysis based on text analysis. In this backdrop, this paper examines the attempts made for the inclusion of minorities into the state system in post-civil war Sri Lanka, which would contribute to finding a resolution to the ethnic conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum No. 2(13)
    ( 1 ) No. 2 (13).] (Sixth Parliament - Second Session) ADDENDUM TO THE ORDER BOOK No. 2 OF PARLIAMENT Issued on Friday, March 09, 2007 Tuesday, March 20, 2007 QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ANSWERS 0448/’06 Hon. Thilakaratne Withanachchi,— To ask the Minister of Land and Land Development,— (a) Will he inform this House separately— (i) the extent of the land called “Apthopwaththa” which has been taken over by the government and comes under the Divisional Secretary of Nagoda in Galle; (ii) the number of allotments that have been distributed so far, from the aforesaid land; (iii) the names and the addresses of those allotees and the extent of land given to them; (iv) the number of allotees who have put up houses in the allotments given to them and are residing in them; (v) whether the aforesaid allotees have sold or transferred the ownership of their respective allotment to others; (vi) the names and the addresses of those allotees who have transferred or changed the ownership as mentioned above or those who do not come to their allotment at present? (b) Will he present to this House— (i) whether the aforesaid allotees have been given plots of land again from this land or from any other place without giving lands to the members of families who live in the same house with the hope of putting up their own houses; (ii) separately, the names and addresses of the recipients, if such plot of lands have been given as mentioned above? ( 2 ) (c) Will he state— (i) whether necessary action will be taken to give lands only to the landless by preventing the encroachment on the remaining plots of the aforesaid land that has been taken over by the government; (ii) if so, the period during which it will be done? (d) if not, why? 0838/’06 Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Plan SRI: Preparing the Green Power Development And
    Resettlement Plan Document Stage: Draft Project Number: (SRI) 47037-005 October 2016 SRI: Preparing the Green Power Development and Energy Efficiency Improvement Investment Program – Tranche 2 Prepared byCeylon Electricity Board, Ministry of Power and Renewable Energy, Government of Sri Lanka for Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in July 2016 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/sri-gpdeeiip-t2-jul-2016-rp. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 26 September 2016) Currency unit – Sri Lanka rupee/s (SLRe/SLRs) SLRe1.00 = $0.00684 $1.00 = SLRs146.30 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AP - Affected Persons CEB - Ceylon Electricity Board CPR - Common Property Recourses DP - Displaced Person DS - Divisional Secretary EA - Executing Agency GoSL - Government of Sri Lanka GRC - Grievance Redressal Committee GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism HH - Households IA - Implementing Agency IP - Indigenous People IR - Involuntary Resettlement LAA - Land Acquisition Act-1950 LKR - Sri Lankan Rupees MFF - Multi-tranche Financing Facility MLLD - Ministry of Land and Land Development MPRE - Ministry of Power and Renewable Energy NEA - National Environment Act NIRP - National Involuntary Resettlement Policy PAA - Project Approving Agency PEA - Project Executing Agency PIU - Project Implementation Unit PMU - Project Management Unit RF - Resettlement Framework RoW - Right of Way RP - Resettlement Plan SIA - Social Impact Assessment SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement WHH - Women Headed Household NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Sri Lanka and its agenciesbegins in Janauary and ends in December. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka: Tamil Politics and the Quest for a Political Solution
    SRI LANKA: TAMIL POLITICS AND THE QUEST FOR A POLITICAL SOLUTION Asia Report N°239 – 20 November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. TAMIL GRIEVANCES AND THE FAILURE OF POLITICAL RESPONSES ........ 2 A. CONTINUING GRIEVANCES ........................................................................................................... 2 B. NATION, HOMELAND, SEPARATISM ............................................................................................. 3 C. THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT AND AFTER ................................................................................ 4 D. LOWERING THE BAR .................................................................................................................... 5 III. POST-WAR TAMIL POLITICS UNDER TNA LEADERSHIP ................................. 6 A. RESURRECTING THE DEMOCRATIC TRADITION IN TAMIL POLITICS .............................................. 6 1. The TNA ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Pro-government Tamil parties ..................................................................................................... 8 B. TNA’S MODERATE APPROACH: YET TO BEAR FRUIT .................................................................. 8 1. Patience and compromise in negotiations
    [Show full text]