DOCSLIB.ORG

APR 2 1971 by G UBUCATIONS DEPT, Theodore H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APR 2 1971 by G UBUCATIONS DEPT, Theodore H r :D 5/481 U.S. A THE PROS AND CONS OF COMPULSORY LIBRARY ARBITRATION SANTA BARBARA UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Prepared for The New York Chamber of Commerce APR 2 1971 by G UBUCATIONS DEPT, Theodore H. Kheel, Esq. Senior Partner, Battle, Fowler, Necman, Stokes and Kheel ! 1' A Limited Number -of Additional Copies Are Available on Request NEW YORK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE- 65 .iberty Street New York 5, New York Rctor 2-1123 March, 1961 Reproduced by the Library of Congress, Legislatve R;fercnce Service, July 12, 1963 M Ebb 4 ii INDEX Pages 1. The Purpose of This Study........................................... 3 2. How Much Compulsion Is Needed....................................... 5 3. What This Study Includes............................................ 7 4. The Differnece Between Compulsory and Voluntary Arbitration......... 8 5. The Extent of the Strike Problem, the Various Types of Strikes, and the Existing Machinery For Setting Them........ .................... 10 6. Why Both Management an Labor Are Opposed to Voluntary Arbitration of Terminal or Contracts Disputes...................................... 13 7. Wartime Experience With Compulsory Arbitration...................... 16 8. The Case Against Compulsory Arbitration............................. 18 A.Adverse Effect on Collective Bargaining........................ 18 B.Enforcement.................................................... 20 C.Inevitability of Government Control Over Prices and Wages...... 22 D.Senatro TaftIs Reviews........................................ 23 9. The Case For Compulsory Arbitration................................. 25 10. Compulsory Arbitration in Federally Regulated Industries............ 27 11. Compulsory Arbitration in State Regulated Industries................ 30 A. Types of Statutes...................................... 30 B. Legal Consequences..................................... 31 12. Compulsory Arbitration in Foreign Countries......................... 36 13. Alternate Ways of Handling National Emergency.Disputes.............. 41 A. The Taft-Hartley Approach..................................... 41 B. The Search For a Better Formula............................... 44 1 3 4 1. The Purpose of This St-idy to the fire. Even in local disputes, considerable agitation developed over strikes that spread far beyond their own bound- President Eisenhower, a staunch advocate of a hands-off policy in recent years of several months in the Summer and Fall of 1960 in labor-management disputes, became visibly alarmed when the aries. A strike elevator constructors brought New York City's 116-day steel strike of 1959, temporarily stopped by an 80-day by a few hundred building construction program almost to a halt. Taft-Ilartlcy Act injunction, threatened to break out again. Aban- billion-dollar-a--ear doning his traditional policy of non-interference in labor-manage- Tfle strike problem, particularly when it involves the national ment affairs, the Presidcnt sternly warned both sides: welfare, came in for considerable discussion by the candidates and "America will not-indeed, it cannot-tolerate for long the of both major parties during the 1960 campaign. Republicans and it is clear that the public crippling of the entire economy as the result of labor-management Democrats alike promised a solution, Congress to find an effective disputes." The choice for "free American employers and em- expects the new administration and conflicts that ployees," he added, was clear. "Voluntarily, in the spirit of free device for coping with large-scale union-management immediate circles. collective bargaining, they will act responsibly; or else, in due have a serious impact far beyond their -course, their countrymen will see to it that they do act responsibly." Secretary of Labor Arthur J. Goldberg recognized this deep- particular His "or else" was widely interpreted as an ultimatum that, felt need when he was named to the cabinet. "Of unless the steel strike was quickly settled, compulsory arbitration concern to me," he said, "is tle pronhtion of labor-management would be invoked as a solution. The strike was settled on January peace." He called this "an objective toward which I am whole- 4, 1960, three wecks before the injunction was due to expire. But heartedly dedicated, for which Y have worked in the past, and what if it had not been settled? What would Congress, into for which I will work unceasingly in the years ahead." whose reluctant lap this dispute would then have been dropped, The idea that compulsory arbitration might be used to head have been able to do about it?\What can this country do to pro- off feuds between industry and labor did not, of course, originate tect itself against tie impact of such strikes? with President Eisenhower. Such proposals, frequently pro- More than a year has passed since the steel strike ended, but pounded by persistent foes of industry-wide strikes and as often the continuing concern over national emergency strikes is still with condemned by opponents of any type of compulsion, have been us. A special committee of the National Council of Churches, the advanced and denounced, off and on, for more than forty years. nation's single most influential group of clerical and lay religious A wave of strikes immediately after World War I provided con- leaders, recently issued a report condemning industry and labor siderable imp(!,s in Congress for a law to prohibit large-scale for shirking public responsibilities in the steel stoppage, and work stoppages, and the view that compulsory arbitration may be . making recommendations to prevent a repetition. The proposals, the tool to insure labor peace has gained acceptance in some quar- discussed later in this study, seem, however, to fall far short of ters as the cold war has intensified. any guarantee that a similar crisis in steel or another vital industry The purpose of this study is to explain what compulsory will not occur again. arbitration is, how it works, and what ifs advantages and disad- The-belief that a positive formula must be found to prevent vantages are. There is no intention here to endorse or oppose national emergency strikes stems from more than the steel walk- conpulsory arbitration; rather, the aim is to present both sides ,ut. 11e distasteful prospect of a stoppage on most of the major of this important and controversial subject so that intelligent railroads in a disagreement over work rules spurred the search Ainericans way become better informed on whether comrplulsory early in 1960 for new methods to achieve peace in that critical arbitration is a practical and desirable way of pieren;i;ng Strikes industry. An 11-day shutdown of the Pennsylvania Railroad, that might otherwise become national emergencies and threats to America's largest rail carrier, in September, 1960 added new fuel the public welfare. - 9 - S 6 disobedience. fo".t of 2. How Much Cosnpulsion Is Nccdcd alatlilLi, often to the point of wil ilful us remember how millions of Americans expressed their disap- are the direct results disagreements between man- Str'kcs of Froval of a law banning the transportation and sale of alcoholic agement and labor in administering or renewing approximately liquors for 14 years, to say nothing of the casual and widespread I 25,C00 collective bargaining contracts under which some 17 z way current laws against gambling have bcen flouted. This patent million Americans, members of about 200 national unions and resentment against being told by law what to do and how to do a strike 15,000 locals, earn their livelihoods. But the prospect of it is especially evident in the head-on clashes between industry and is the single most potent factor in persuading the disputing sides labor. Neither, although for different reasons, wants to be ordered to sit down at a bargaining table and compromise their differences. around by the government. Management's fear of strike-caused losses of production and of management and labor to compul- profits, along with a union's worry over lost wages hardly ever Indeed, the opposition recouped, jointly constitute the prime pressures in hammering out sory arbitration as a national or state policy is so deep-rooted, subject to public regulations, that a peace pact, either before or during a strike. except in the few industries there is little chance that it will be imposed in the foreseeable Where a strike affects only the disputants themselves, no future. Nor, for that matter, do the most vigorous advocates of great need exists for any restriction on its use. But when non- compulsory arbitration seriously advance it as the panacea for rill combatants are hurt, obviously thought mu t be given to their disputes., Thcy confine their recommendations primarily to those with the economy. there- protection. B,, as sdcnts of industrial relations point o;t, disputes which threaten wide segments of If, rc;)no l"' of the strike ince;'tIve for ind'striad corn promise, another fore, there is any likelihood at all of a compulsory arbitration law way of blinding age.,nen;s. ii be joiinndl since, izncr sI/Cl) being enacted on a federal icvcl in the next few years, it will Crci1msances, companies and mInions will frcl .:fentlyfail to reach certainly be carefully circumscribed, most labor relations experts accord1 by themselves. ienc theIe proposal oJ con/pudsory arbitra- are convinced, to apply only in cases of work disruptions and lion, which its sa'pportcrs say is the only possible alternative if production stoppages described by the Taft-Ifartley Act as threaten- strikes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tape Subject Log (Rev
    1 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. 10/08) Conversation No. 60-1 Date: June 8, 1971 Time: 8:03 am - unknown before 10:31 am Location: Cabinet Room The President met with Vice President Spiro T. Agnew, John B. Connally, Melvin R. Laird, John N. Mitchell, Winton M. (“Red”) Blount, Rogers C. B. Morton, Clifford M. Hardin, Maurice H. Stans, James D. Hodgson, Elliot L. Richardson, George W. Romney, John A. Volpe, George P. Shultz, Robert H. Finch, Donald H. Rumsfeld, George H. W. Bush, John D. Ehrlichman, Clark MacGregor, Peter M. Flanigan, Peter G. Peterson, Herbert G. Klein, Dr. Edward E. David, Jr., Raymond K. Price, Jr., Ronald L. Ziegler, Robert J. Brown, Edward L. Morgan, Edwin L. Harper, John C. Whitaker, Neal Ball, Egil (“Bud”) Krogh, Jr., Raymond J. Waldman, Leonard Garment, John F. Evans, Jr., Lewis A. Engman, Roy D. Morey, Peter Michel, Geoffrey C. Shepard, Martin C. (“Marty”) Anderson, Kenneth R. Cole, Jr., Paul W. McCracken, Caspar W. (“Cap”) Weinberger, Arnold R. Weber, and Arthur J. Sohmer [General conversation/Unintelligible] Attendance at meeting -Aids to Cabinet officers -Ehrlichman’s view of input -Responsibilities of those attending -Domestic Policy Council planning -Budget planning for Fiscal Year 1973 -Legislative package -Republican Party platform Topics/Issues -Homes in America -Goals -Policy -Programs -Focus of discussion -Domestic Council approach -Identification of next year’s issues -Summary of action-forcing events -1972 election -Emphasis -Action needed -Polls -Perceptions of people 2 NIXON
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of WORK STOPPAGES 1960
    Analysis of WORK STOPPAGES 1960 Bulletin No.1302 September 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Ewan Clague, Commissioner For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C. - Price 30 cents Preface This bulletin presents a detailed statistical anal- ysis of work stoppages in 1960, continuing an annual fea- ture of the Bureau of Labor Statistics' program in the field of industrial relations. Preliminary monthly esti- mates of the level of strike (or lockout) activity for the United States as a whole are issued about 30 days after the end of the month of reference and are available upon request. Preliminary estimates for the entire year are available at the year's end; selected final tabulations are issued in April of the following year. The methods used in preparing work stoppage statistics are described in appendix B. The Bureau wishes to acknowledge the coopera- tion of employers and employer associations, labor unions, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, and various State agencies in furnishing information on work stoppages. This report was prepared in the Bureau's Divi- sion of Wages and Industrial Relations by Loretto R. Nolan and Julian Malnak under the direction of Joseph W. Bloch. Contents Page Summary_—____----__________-----------______ ______ -----_____—_—_--------- 1 Trends in work stoppages. ----,-----------------__________—_--_____—____ 1 Sizeof stoppages ---------------------___________--------------_—_---------
    [Show full text]
  • Labor and the Cold War
    University of Central Florida STARS PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements 1-1-1959 Labor and the cold war Stewart Meacham Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Book is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Meacham, Stewart, "Labor and the cold war" (1959). PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements. 522. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism/522 COLD WAR by STEWART MEACHAM AUTHOR'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT Friends in the labor movement as well as colleagues on the staff of th American Friends Service Committee have been kind enough to read th manuscript of this pamphlet. I have profited greatly from their comments and criticism, but full responsibility for the finished product is mine alone. It represents my own views and not necessarily those of friends nor of the Peace Education Program of the American Friends Semi Committee. September, 1959 Stewart Meacham COLD QWAR by STEWART MEACHAM Pzibli~hedar an educaiional service by PEACEEDUCATION PROGRAM AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE 160 North 15th St., Philadelphia 2, Pa. CONTENTS Introduction .................................................... I I . The Cold War and the Domestic Economy . I1. The Cold War and National Security ............ 111 . The Cold War and World Economic Development IV . What Can Be Done? Bibliography INTRODUCTION During the last 12 years the United States and the Soviet Union have been engaged in cold war.
    [Show full text]
  • American Working-Class Identity and Memory Within Transformations of Capitalism Andy Stec
    Hamline University DigitalCommons@Hamline Departmental Honors Projects College of Liberal Arts Spring 2019 “It’s in the Blood”: American Working-Class Identity and Memory within Transformations of Capitalism Andy Stec Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/dhp Part of the Labor History Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Stec, Andy, "“It’s in the Blood”: American Working-Class Identity and Memory within Transformations of Capitalism" (2019). Departmental Honors Projects. 85. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/dhp/85 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts at DigitalCommons@Hamline. It has been accepted for inclusion in Departmental Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Hamline. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. “It’s in the Blood”: American Working-Class Identity and Memory within Transformations of Capitalism Andrew Joseph Stec An Honors Thesis Submitted for partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with honors in History and Philosophy from Hamline University April 2019 1 Acknowledgements 2 Scholarship on Postwar American Capitalism 7 Reacting to the Crisis of Keynesianism (1967-1990s) 8 In Retrospect to the Fall of Keynesianism (2000s) 25 Postwar American Capitalism in Transition 29 The Postwar Industrial Union 32 The Fall of Keynesianism: Alienation 37 The Fall of Keynesianism: End of Prosperity 39 National Malaise
    [Show full text]
  • Automation and the Meaning of Work in the Postwar United States
    The Misanthropic Sublime: Automation and the Meaning of Work in the Postwar United States Jason Resnikoff Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Jason Zachary Resnikoff All rights reserved Abstract “The Misanthropic Sublime: Automation and the Meaning of Work in the Postwar United States” Jason Resnikoff In the United States of America after World War II, Americans from across the political spectrum adopted the technological optimism of the postwar period to resolve one of the central contradictions of industrial society—the opposition between work and freedom. Although classical American liberalism held that freedom for citizens meant owning property they worked for themselves, many Americans in the postwar period believed that work had come to mean the act of maintaining mere survival. The broad acceptance of this degraded meaning of work found expression in a word coined by managers in the immediate postwar period: “automation.” Between the late 1940s and the early 1970s, the word “automation” stood for a revolutionary development, even though few could agree as to precisely what kind of technology it described. Rather than a specific technology, however, this dissertation argues that “automation” was a discourse that defined work as mere biological survival and saw the end of human labor as the the inevitable result of technological progress. In premising liberation on the end of work, those who subscribed to the automation discourse made political freedom contingent not on the distribution of power, but on escape from the limits of the human body itself.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Jeung Oregon 0171A 12691.Pdf
    LABOR MARKET POLICY AMERICAN STYLE: STATE CAPACITY AND POLICY INNOVATION, 1959-1968 by YONGWOO JEUNG A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Political Science and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Yongwoo Jeung Title: Labor Market Policy American Style: State Capacity and Policy Innovation, 1959- 1968 This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Political Science by: Gerald Berk Chairperson Craig Parsons Core Member Joseph Lowndes Core Member Daniel Pope Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded March 2020. ii © 2020 Yongwoo Jeung This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Yongwoo Jeung Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science March 2020 Title: Labor Market Policy American Style: State Capacity and Policy Innovation, 1959- 1968 This dissertation delves into the American state’s capabilities by examining its experiments with corporatism and labor training during the 1960s. The dissertation relies on the frameworks of layering, patchwork, intercurrence, and entrepreneurship from various disciplines including comparative historical analysis, historical institutionalism, American Political Development, and the school of political creativity. The dissertation first challenges the mainstream view that regards as impossible any tripartite bargaining among U.S. labor, management, and the state. The United States experimented with the unique tripartite committee—the President’s Committee on Labor- Management Policy—in the early 1960s to address emerging problems such as automation and intractable industrial conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Extent of Union Power Sylvester Petro
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 35 Article 4 Issue 5 Symposium 9-1-1960 Sources and Extent of Union Power Sylvester Petro Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sylvester Petro, Sources and Extent of Union Power, 35 Notre Dame L. Rev. 603 (1960). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol35/iss5/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOURCES AND EXTENT OF UNION POWER By Sylvester Petro* The most pressing need in labor relations today is a policy which will meet the social threats posed by union power without increasing the even more critical threats posed by big government. Many unions have abused working men and businessmen, exploited consumers, and demonstrated again and again their power to disrupt the economy. The abuses of big government are different, but they are even more deadly and more irrevocable. Unchecked they mean an end to the personal freedom and private property rights which have been the most significant features of western civilization. A policy which will remove the union threat without increasing the role of government is available and can be expressed in very simple terms. Al- though that policy is at present politically unacceptable, politics can be trusted to follow public opinion. The job, therefore, is one of establishing that the gravest threats can be effectively removed without increasing the role and power of government.
    [Show full text]
  • AFSCME Office of the Secretary-Treasurer: Gordon Chapman Records
    THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY-TREASURER Papers, 1926-1968 (predominantly, 1936-1961) 84.25 linear feet Accession Number 1990 L.C. Number MS The papers of the AFSCME Secretary-Treasurer's Office were placed in the Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs in the fall of 1974 and were opened for research in November of 1984. The materials in this collection were created during the presidency of Arnold S. Zander, founder and first president of AFSCME (1935-1961). The Secretary-Trea- surer's Office oversaw the general financial health of the international union, keeping records for its locals, councils and the headquarters staff. If a council or local were placed under trusteeship or evidenced some other difficulty, files documenting these events were also kept here. This office maintained the payment of per capita dues by AFSCME locals and councils, and issued charters to new locals. It also suspended and disbanded locals or councils when problems arose, such as the non-payment of dues. Union organizing itself was under the jurisdiction of the Director of Organization and was a separate function. These papers consist mainly of materials relating to the founding and disbanding of thousands of locals and councils in all the states, Puerto Rico, Panama and Canada. Locals of each state were affiliated with a regional or state council and paid dues to the council as well as to the International. On occasion larger conferences were set up which included councils and locals in several states. During Zander's incumbency, Gordon Chapman was the Secretary-Treasurer for all but a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Strike Violence: the Need for Federal Injunctions
    University of Pennsylvania Law Review FOUNDED 1852 Formerly American Law Register VOL. 114 FEBRUARY 1966 No. 4 STRIKE VIOLENCE: THE NEED FOR FEDERAL INJUNCTIONS FRANK H. STEWART f & ROBERT J. TowNsED * No country has a good code of laws. The reason for this is evident: the laws have been made according to the time, the place [and] the need. When the needs have changed, the laws which have remained have become ridiculous. Thus the law which forbade the eating of pig and the drinking of wine was very reasonable in Arabia, where pig and wine are injurious. But it is absurd at Constantinople. Voltaire, Laws, from the Philisophical Dictionary An assault is an assault and a battery is a battery. In every jurisdiction in the United States these common-law torts are actionable, civilly and criminally. One is not privileged to strike the landlord, the policeman, or the professor except in self defense. If one disagrees with an opponent he should seek legal redress-except in labor disputes. The mystique of labor law is that strike violence is an aberration so strange and perplexing that ordinary standards of assault and battery simply will not do. The theory seems to be that, since violence is a traditional part of labor disputes, tradition sanctions its use. This tA.B., Harvard, 1952; LL.B., Virginia, 1957. Associate, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati. * B.A., Michigan State, 1960; LL.B., Harvard, 1963. Associate, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati. We thank J. Mack Swigert W. Bruce Baird, W. K. Engeman, and H. F. McCann for their patience in reading this manuscript and for their helpful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Paperbackisbn-0-88099-079-1; $21.95 Hardcover -- ISBN -0- 88099- 080 -5)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 313- CE 053 780 AUTHOR Hutchens, Robert; And Others TITLE Strikers-and Subsidies. The Influence of Government Transfer Ptograms on:Strike Activity. INSTITUTION Upjohn (W.E.) Inst. for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Mich. 'REPORT NO ISBN-0,88099-079-1 PUB DATE 89 NOTE 234p. AVAILABLE FROMW.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 300 South Westnedge Avenue, Kalamazoo, NI 49007 ($12.95 paperbackISBN-0-88099-079-1; $21.95 hardcover -- ISBN -0- 88099- 080 -5). pUB TYPE Books (010) --'Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MFO1 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Eligibility; Labor Demands; Labor Problems; *Strikes; *Unemployment Insurance; *Unions; Welfare .Recipients; *Welfare Services IDENTIFIERS Aid. to Families with Dependent Children ABSTRACT The effects of government transfer programs such as unemployment insurance and welfare assistance on strikes were studied -by analyzing state -level -data on strike frequency from 1960 through 1974. Effects -were estimated 1.,4 using ordinary least squares_ regression, supplementing traditional models of strike activity with Measures of transfer program characteri'.ics. No support Was found for the claim that-Aid to Families with Dependent Children, food stamps, or general assistance affect strikes. HoWever, evidence was found linking unemployment insurance payments to the frequency of strikeF., with a more generous unemployment insurance program being as....:)ciated with a higher strike frequency. No conclusions were possiblepn-whether unemployment insurance programs affect either strike duration-or the number of workers involved in strikes. Either there are no effects or-the-methods used were not precise enough to measure the_effects,of two states, -(New York and Rhode Island) provision of unemployment compensation to strikers after a waiting period of 7-8 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Steel Strike of 1959 and the Anatomy of the New Deal Order
    Conflict and Consensus: The Steel Strike of 1959 and the Anatomy of the New Deal Order Kristoffer Smemo, University of California, Santa Barbara Samir Sonti, University of California, Santa Barbara Gabriel Winant, Yale University ABSTRACT This article places the 1959 steel strike—the largest work stoppage in US history— within the trajectory of the New Deal order. We provide a multiscalar account of the strike that stretches from the mills and corporate boardrooms, to Congress and the Oval Office, and back to the homes of steelworkers themselves. The strike crys- tallized the limits of postwar collective bargaining and Keynesian policy making to manage postwar economic growth. Those limitations allowed steelworkers to lay claim to the New Deal’s promise of industrial citizenship and defend the moral econ- omy of their home life—but only for a brief time. Therefore, unpacking the steel strike along these lines recasts the entire New Deal order as a complex formation composed of multiple layers of social activity, each powered by its own internal dynamics, and each in contradictory relation to the others. hey handed us an issue,” United Steelworkers of America (USWA) Pres- ident David McDonald remarked in early January 1960. Days earlier, his T union and steel industry representatives, with a little help from Vice Presi- dent Richard Nixon, had reached an agreement to end what by then had become the largest strike in the history of the United States. “Icouldn’t have written the script We greatly appreciate the encouragement and counsel of Heather Berg, Michael Denning, Jennifer Klein, Nelson Lichtenstein, Joesph McCartin, Jack Metzgar, David Stebenne, Judith Stein, and the engaged au- dience at our panel for the Washington, DC, meeting of the Labor and Working-Class History Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Strikes and the Reagan Labor Law Project
    CHAPTER SIX: STRIKES AND THE REAGAN LABOR LAW PROJECT- THREE CASE STUDIES Introduction In this chapter I examine three union strikes that occurred in the United States during the latter part of the 1980s. I specifically assess the degree to which labor law policies and practices of the Reagan administration influenced the outcomes of these industrial conflicts. As I discussed in Chapter Three, the strikes selected for analysis are: the 1986-87 dispute between the United Steel Workers of America (USWA) and the USX Corporation (formerly United States Steel); the 1987 strike between the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) and John Morrell & Co.; and the 1989-90 conflict between the United Mine Workers 278 of America (UMWA) and the Pittston Coal Group.185 As with the previous chapter, I will present a chronological overview of each dispute, followed by a more detailed analysis of the role of collective labor law. The concluding discussion sections for each dispute serve to preview Chapter Seven, which places both the British and American cases in a broader comparative context. The 1986-87 Steel Strike/Lockout: A Battle Among the Ruins Overview As the United States steel industry slid down the slippery slope of industrial decline during the 1980s, the adversarialism that had long marked labor-management relations in this economic sector intensified. Each side held the other responsible for the industry's diminishing global stature and its domestic misfortunes, with the United Steel Workers of 185 While this latter strike technically took place during the early years of the Bush administration, I contend that the Reagan administration's labor law regime was effectively still in operation at the time of this dispute.
    [Show full text]