DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoliosis and Kyphosis: an Update on Diagnosis and Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scoliosis and Kyphosis: an Update on Diagnosis and Management 2/18/2016 Scoliosis and Kyphosis: An Update on Diagnosis and Management Lloyd A. Hey M.D., M.S Hey Clinic for Scoliosis and Spine Surgery http://www.heyclinic.com hey@heyclinic.com 2 Learning Objectives: To learn proper screening techniques for diagnosing spinal deformities Understand proper conservative management for patients with deformity. To be able to quickly identify the five “red flag signs” in spinal patients that may indicate an urgent spine problem. Disclosures: • I have no disclosures SPINAL DEFORMITY: IT’S NOT JUST COSMETIC. CAN CAUSE LONG-TERM SUFFERING Case Report, 34 AD (2000 yrs ago) “On a Sabbath Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues, and a woman was there who had been crippled by a spirit for eighteen years. She was bent over and could not straighten up at all. When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, “Woman, you are set free from your infirmity.” Then he put his hands on her, and immediately she straightened up and praised God.” Bible, NIV Luke 13:10-13 1 2/18/2016 My own suffering and healing experience: In 1978, a compassionate team, including Dr. Mark Pittman, and Barbara Bader, PT, saved my life, my sanity, my badly broken leg, and inspired me to serve too, using compassion + engineering to help patients Barbara Bader, PT 5 1980-84: MIT Engineering, 84-88 Harvard Med 1989-1994: Harvard Residency, Boston Children’s Hospital Inspired and Trained by Dr. John Hall who put metal frames on the INSIDE to work miracles to straighten children. 2008 Dr. Hey & Dr. John Hall Vision: Life-Long Spinal Deformity Care 1994: Duke Spine Fellowship 1995-2004: Duke Faculty 2005-Current: Hey Clinic for Scoliosis and Spine Surgery From Patient with “frame on outside” my leg 6 To Engineer, designing frames, cartilage research To Scoliosis Surgeon, helping children and adults with “frames on the inside” Always seeking to work as catalyst building, serving with, and learning from the team: To serve well, and improve care over time. 2 2/18/2016 Types of Spinal Deformity 7 Scoliosis Lateral curvature of the spine Kyphosis Exaggeration of normal curvature of thoracic spine Spondylolisthesis Slippage of one vertebra on the other, either forwards or backwards. 8 Why does Spinal Deformity Matter? Can impact quality of life with limited activity, pain, disability, reduced respiratory function or diminished self- esteem. THINK LIFE-LONG. Emphasis on Prevention of future suffering Scoliosis Causes: Idiopathic, Congenital, Neurologic (cerebral palsy, neuro- muscular) Complex genetic connection: Females are 8 times more likely to progress to curve magnitude that requires treatment. Fathers with scoliosis more likely to pass on scoliosis to children. Genetic Tests Ineffective. 3 2/18/2016 10 Screening for Scoliosis: Physical Exam Signs Thoracic rib or lumbar Shoulder hump Trunk Shift Asymmetry Scoliometer Check Thoracic and Lumbar Areas Scoliometer or App for iPhone: Scoliometer reading over 5 degrees X-Ray Indicated. Bunnell WP The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume [1984, 66(9):1381-7] Spinal Deformity Screening in Adults Degenerative scoliosis is common – 30% older adult pop. Low back pain w/ scoliosis treated conservatively like other patients. “Stable” curves can become unstable, or more rapidly progressive in later adulthood w/ degenerative collapse Height and X-Ray measurements over time very helpful Deformity after fractures. Deformity above / below old spinal fusions. Flatback. AVOID SCOLIOSIS MISNOMER #1: YOU ARE DONE GROWING SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT CURVE PROGRESSION 4 2/18/2016 Treatment, including bracing Growing child, adolescent: <25 degrees – observe (every 4-6 months when growing) 25-30 degrees – consider bracing if curve progressive and still growing 30-39 degrees – consider bracing even first visit, if growth remaining. 40 degrees or more: surgery usually. Bracing requires longer discussion, considering whole patient and family: compliance an issue. In Adults, continue to monitor curve each year through age 25, and after each pregnancy. Older patients can be monitored every 2-5 years. 14 Conservative Treatment Includes: Physical Therapy Including core strengthening for low back pain Low impact aerobic exercise Healthy Weight For every 1 lb overweight someone is, there is an additional 5 lbs on the low back! NSAIDS Light weight low back brace Follow-up to check for progression of deformity “We conducted the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BRAIST) to determine the effectiveness of bracing, as compared with observation, in preventing progression of the curve to 50 degrees or more (a common indication for surgery)…. The primary outcome was determined when the first of two conditions was met: curve progression to 50 degrees or more (treatment failure) or skeletal maturity without this degree of curve progression (treatment success)…. 1,086 met criteria, only willing to be 116 randomized, 126 preference The rate of treatment success was 72% in the bracing group and 48% in the observation group … 5 2/18/2016 Years of being out of alignment can wear out “Goodyear” discs. Early Realignment can prevent that destruction Disc damage starts during …which can help prevent this adolescence, but is reversible disabling outcome 10-60+ years with surgical realignment… later. Result: Pain, quality of life, disability, and need for larger / more risky surgery Potential for decreased pulmonary function. Posture Self image issues 17 Surgical Correction: Adolescents 18 Surgical Correction: Adults Due to the degeneration in the lower back, a longer fusion is required than the adolescent with the same curve. 6 2/18/2016 19 Case Presentation: You have patient that had a Harrington Rod placement in their teens. They are now complaining of increased difficulty standing up straight, walking, and increasing low back pain. The x-rays show all hardware is in good position. What is your differential diagnosis? 20 Flat back syndrome or failure below the fusion is one of conditions we are now treating for prior Harrington Rod/earlier scoliosis constructs. Most patients are middle-aged who had surgery in their teens/20’s for their scoliosis. The constructs for these fusions were straight rods, without any kyphosis/lordosis curves, so it puts lots of pressure on the area below the fusion, which most of the time ends in the middle of the lordosis. This can be treated by extending the fusion and giving the proper lordosis in the lower back. Patients pain and posture is greatly relieved. Kyphosis –Not Always Just “Bad Posture” Exaggerated curve that causes a rounded shoulder or hunched back Normal kyphosis : 30-45 deg. > 60 deg may become symptomatic > 70 consider surgery Often associated with lower back and neck pain Is followed like scoliosis Can be post-traumatic, or postop complication (proximal junctional kyphosis) 7 2/18/2016 22 Types of Kyphosis: Post-Traumatic Likely due to a fracture Post-Surgical Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) or Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) Scheuermann’s Due to growth plate abnormality Degenerative Osteoporosis causing compression fractures Spondylolisthesis • Slippage of one vertebra on another (side, front, back) • Can be genetic, result of a pars fracture or due to disc degeneration • Pars fractures are painful and can cause lots of pain- seen in gymnasts and catchers in baseball frequently. • Increased risk for stenosis (nerve pinch) with these 24 Spondylolisthesis Monitoring and Treatment Important to follow regularly, especially if a pars fracture is etiology because high risk of progression. Can brace, with light weight or custom molded low back brace. Will not correct deformity, but can help symptomatically. Surgery is considered if the slippage is progressive, causing significant pain or a nerve pinch. 8 2/18/2016 25 26 Emergency Signs/Symptoms No matter what spine condition you encounter, the following are “red flag signs” and could be an indicator of a spinal cord or significant nerve pinch: Loss of bowel or bladder function Progressive pain Progressive Weakness Progressive Clumsiness Progressive Numbness The simple adolescent idiopathic scoliosis/ kyphosis patient: Think like an engineer: postop sports? 9 2/18/2016 Playing sports after scoliosis surgery? 12 yo volley ball player with 57 degree preop, 2yrs out 16 yo golfer from FL put off surgery due to pro golf concerns 10 2/18/2016 Can I bend after scoliosis surgery? 11 2/18/2016 Lifelong spine deformity care benefits 37 years later, still learning, still “tinkering” innovating, working with the team Compassion empowering everything we do. Treat others the way we would (or have!) been treated. Still enjoy improving “Craftsmanship” Every Error is a chance to Learn, and then Improve/Innovate. Special people we work and serve with increases the joy as we serve and learn together, and have team wins. Summary and Quiz!! 36 Thank you…..Questions?? Contact Information: Lloyd A. Hey M.D., M.S. Hey Clinic for Scoliosis and Spine Surgery http://www.heyclinic.com hey@heyclinic.com Rachel Griffin, PA-C (919) 279-3556 (cell) rachel@heyclinic.com 12.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spinal Deformity Study Group
    Spinal Deformity Study Group Editors in Chief Radiographic Michael F. O’Brien, MD Timothy R. Kuklo, MD Kathy M. Blanke, RN Measurement Lawrence G. Lenke, MD Manual B T2 T5 T2–T12 CSVL T5–T12 +X° -X +X° C7PL T12 L2 A S1 ©2008 Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. – 0 + Radiographic Measurement Manual Editors in Chief Michael F. O’Brien, MD Timothy R. Kuklo, MD Kathy M. Blanke, RN Lawrence G. Lenke, MD Section Editors Keith H. Bridwell, MD Kathy M. Blanke, RN Christopher L. Hamill, MD William C. Horton, MD Timothy R. Kuklo, MD Hubert B. Labelle, MD Lawrence G. Lenke, MD Michael F. O’Brien, MD David W. Polly Jr, MD B. Stephens Richards III, MD Pierre Roussouly, MD James O. Sanders, MD ©2008 Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. Acknowledgements Radiographic Measurement Manual The radiographic measurement manual has been developed to present standardized techniques for radiographic measurement. In addition, this manual will serve as a complimentary guide for the Spinal Deformity Study Group’s radiographic measurement software. Special thanks to the following members of the Spinal Deformity Study Group in the development of this manual. Sigurd Berven, MD Hubert B. Labelle, MD Randal Betz, MD Lawrence G. Lenke, MD Fabien D. Bitan, MD Thomas G. Lowe, MD John T. Braun, MD John P. Lubicky, MD Keith H. Bridwell, MD Steven M. Mardjetko, MD Courtney W. Brown, MD Richard E. McCarthy, MD Daniel H. Chopin, MD Andrew A. Merola, MD Edgar G. Dawson, MD Michael Neuwirth, MD Christopher DeWald, MD Peter O. Newton, MD Mohammad Diab, MD Michael F.
    [Show full text]
  • Lordosis, Kyphosis, and Scoliosis
    SPINAL CURVATURES: LORDOSIS, KYPHOSIS, AND SCOLIOSIS The human spine normally curves to aid in stability or balance and to assist in absorbing shock during movement. These gentle curves can be seen from the side or lateral view of the spine. When viewed from the back, the spine should run straight down the middle of the back. When there are abnormalities or changes in the natural spinal curvature, these abnormalities are named with the following conditions and include the following symptoms. LORDOSIS Some lordosis is normal in the lower portion or, lumbar section, of the human spine. A decreased or exaggerated amount of lordosis that is causing spinal instability is a condition that may affect some patients. Symptoms of Lordosis include: ● Appearance of sway back where the lower back region has a pronounced curve and looks hollow with a pronounced buttock area ● Difficulty with movement in certain directions ● Low back pain KYPHOSIS This condition is diagnosed when the patient has a rounded upper back and the spine is bent over or curved more than 50 degrees. Symptoms of Kyphosis include: ● Curved or hunched upper back ● Patient’s head that leans forward ● May have upper back pain ● Experiences upper back discomfort after movement or exercise SCOLIOSIS The most common of the three curvatures. This condition is diagnosed when the spine looks like a “s” or “c” from the back. The spine is not straight up and down but has a curve or two running side-to-side. Sagittal Balance Definition • Sagittal= front-to-back direction (sagittal plane) • Imbalance= Lack of harmony or balance Etiology ​ • Excessive lordosis (backwards lean) or kyphosis (forward lean) • Traumatic injury • Previous spinal fusion that disrupted sagittal balance Effects • Low back pain • Difficulty walking • Inability to look straight ahead when upright The most ergonomic and natural posture is to maintain neutral balance, with the head positioned over the shoulders and pelvis.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly
    277 Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly KellenD.Winden,MD,PhD1 Christopher J. Yuskaitis, MD, PhD1 Annapurna Poduri, MD, MPH2 1 Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Address for correspondence Annapurna Poduri, Epilepsy Genetics Massachusetts Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Department of Neurology, Fegan 9, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Electrophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (e-mail: Annapurna.Poduri@childrens.harvard.edu). Semin Neurol 2015;35:277–287. Abstract Megalencephaly is a developmental disorder characterized by brain overgrowth secondary to increased size and/or numbers of neurons and glia. These disorders can be divided into metabolic and developmental categories based on their molecular etiologies. Metabolic megalencephalies are mostly caused by genetic defects in cellular metabolism, whereas developmental megalencephalies have recently been shown to be caused by alterations in signaling pathways that regulate neuronal replication, growth, and migration. These disorders often lead to epilepsy, developmental disabilities, and Keywords behavioral problems; specific disorders have associations with overgrowth or abnor- ► megalencephaly malities in other tissues. The molecular underpinnings of many of these disorders are ► hemimegalencephaly now understood, providing insight into how dysregulation of critical pathways leads to ►
    [Show full text]
  • SCOLIOSIS: What Is New and True? Natural History, Screening/Evaluation and Treatment
    SCOLIOSIS: what is new and true? Natural history, screening/evaluation and treatment Kathleen Moen MD Swedish Pediatric Specialty Update January 24, 2020 OBJECTIVES • 1) review of entity adolescent idiopathic scoliosis • 2) review the natural history of treated and untreated disease • 3) review screening recommendations and delineating patients who warrant referral • 4) review of treatment modalities Scoliosis • Definition: a lateral spinal curvature measuring at least 10 degrees on xray • Complex 3dimensional spinal deformity Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis • AIS: Scoliosis most often develops and progresses during the most rapid times of growth, typically between ages 10 ‐15 years. • NOT infantile or juvenile scoliosis which have different natural history profiles • NOT congenital spinal deformities, neuromuscular scoliosis or spinal dysraphism Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis • Classic Teaching – Small curves are common – Progression occurs during most rapid times of growth – Female predominance – Big curves get bigger – Etiology unclear: familial predisposition, and? – Idiopathic scoliosis not typically painful Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis • Mild scoliosis curves are common, affecting 2‐3% of the adolescent population, males and females equally • Less than 0.1% of adolescents have curves greater than 40 degrees. • Ratio of females to males 10:1 Cobb Angle Female:Male Prevalence >10 1.4‐2 :1 2 ‐ 3 % >20 5:1 .3 ‐ .5 % >30 10:1 .1 ‐ .3 % >40 10:1 <0.1% Weinstein, SL Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Prevalence and Natural History. Instructional
    [Show full text]
  • Macrocephaly Information Sheet 6-13-19
    Next Generation Sequencing Panel for Macrocephaly Clinical Features: Macrocephaly refers to an abnormally large head, OFC greater than 98th percentile, inclusive of the scalp, cranial bone and intracranial contents. Megalencephaly, brain weight/volume ratio greater than 98th percentile, results from true enlargement of the brain parenchyma [1]. Megalencephaly is typically accompanied by macrocephaly, however macrocephaly can occur in the absence of megalencephaly [2]. Both macrocephaly and megalencephaly can been seen as isolated clinical findings as well as clinical features of a mutli-systemic syndromic diagnosis. Our Macrocephaly Panel includes analysis of the 36 genes listed below. Macrocephaly Sequencing Panel ASXL2 GLI3 MTOR PPP2R5D TCF20 BRWD3 GPC3 NFIA PTEN TBC1D7 CHD4 HEPACAM NFIX RAB39B UPF3B CHD8 HERC1 NONO RIN2 ZBTB20 CUL4B KPTN NSD1 RNF125 DNMT3A MED12 OFD1 RNF135 EED MITF PIGA SEC23B EZH2 MLC1 PPP1CB SETD2 Gene Clinical Features Details ASXL2 Shashi-Pena Shashi et al. (2016) found that six patients with developmental delay, syndrome macrocephaly, and dysmorphic features were found to have de novo truncating variants in ASXL2 [3]. Distinguishing features were macrocephaly, absence of growth retardation, and variability in the degree of intellectual disabilities The phenotype also consisted of prominent eyes, arched eyebrows, hypertelorism, a glabellar nevus flammeus, neonatal feeding difficulties and hypotonia. BRWD3 X-linked intellectual Truncating mutations in the BRWD3 gene have been described in males with disability nonsyndromic intellectual disability and macrocephaly [4]. Other features include a prominent forehead and large cupped ears. CHD4 Sifrim-Hitz-Weiss Weiss et al., 2016, identified five individuals with de novo missense variants in the syndrome CHD4 gene with intellectual disabilities and distinctive facial dysmorphisms [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Kyphectomy in Neonates with Meningomyelocele
    Child's Nervous System (2019) 35:673–681 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-4006-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Kyphectomy in neonates with meningomyelocele Nail Özdemir1 & Senem Alkan Özdemir2 & Esra Arun Özer3 Received: 18 August 2018 /Accepted: 18 November 2018 /Published online: 11 December 2018 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Purpose Kyphosis is the most severe spinal deformity associated with meningomyelocele (MMC) and is seen in approximately 15% of neonates. Our purpose is to present our clinical experience, to discuss the technique and deformity correction in kyphectomy in neonates with MMC, and to assess its long-term outcomes. Method In this prospective study, the authors reviewed eight cases submitted to surgery between 2013 and 2015. We evaluated clinical characteristics that were analyzed, as were the operative technique employed, and angle range of the kyphosis deformity postcorrection follow-up. Results Neonatal kyphectomy was performed of six females and two males. The mean birth weight was 2780 g, and the mean age at the time of surgery was 5.6 days. There were S-shaped type deformity in lumbar region in all neonates. In the correction of the kyphotic deformity, a total vertebrae were removed from four patient, whereas a partial vertebrectomy was done in four. The mean operative time was 116 min. No patients did not require the blood transfusion. There were no serious complications, and wound closure was successful in all patients. The mean follow-up period was 4 years and 3 months (range 36–61 months), except one patient who died 1 week after discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoliosis in Paraplegia
    Paraplegia (1974), II, 290-292 SCOLIOSIS IN PARAPLEGIA By JOHN A. ODOM, JR., M.D. and COURTN EY W. BROWN, M.D. Children's Hospital, Denver, Colorado in conjunction with ROBERT R. JACKSON, M.D., HARRY R. HA HN, M.D. and TERRY V. CARLE, M.D. Craig Rehabilitation Hospital, Englewood, Colorado WITH the increasing instance of excellent medical care, more children with traumatic paraplegia and myelomeningocele with paraplegia live to adulthood. In these two groups of patients there is a high instance of scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis. Much attention in the past years has been placed on hips and feet but only in the last decade has there been much attention concentrated on the treatment of the spines of these patients. Most of this attention has been toward the patient with a traumatic paraplegia with development of scoliosis. Some attempts have been made at fusing the scoliotic spine of myelomeningo­ celes by Harrington Instrumentation but with a rather high instance of complica­ tions and failures. With the event of anterior instrumentation by Dr. Alan Dwyer of Sydney, Australia, the anterior approach to the spine is becoming widely accepted and very successfully used. This is especially valuable in the correction and fusion of the spine with no posterior elements from birth. MATERIAL FOR STUDY Between March of 1971 and June of 1973, there have been 26 paraplegics with scoliosis who have been cared for by the authors. All of these patients have either been myelomeningoceles with paraplegia or spinal cord injuries, all of whom have had scoliosis, kyphosis, or severe lordosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Diagnosis Functional Vs Structural Scoliosis
    Differential Diagnosis Functional vs Structural Scoliosis James J. Lehman, DC, MBA, FACO Associate Professor of Clinical Sciences University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic Director Community Health Clinical Education University of Bridgeport Diagnosis is the key to successful treatment Scoliosis Classification Based upon the findings with this postural presentation, what physical examination procedures would you perform to determine your working diagnosis for the child with scoliosis? Classification of Scoliosis Structural or Nonstructural (functional) 1. Structural curves are fixed, nonflexible, and fail to correct with bending. 2. Nonstructural curves are not fixed but flexible and readily correct with bending. Postural Evaluation of Spine • Observation of standing posture • Right thoracic curve is most common with best prognosis Adam’s Position Differential Diagnosis Functional Scoliosis/Postural Imbalance Pelvic Obliquity and Postural Imbalance • You must determine whether the leg length discrepancy is anatomical or functional Actual Leg-Length Test • This is a tape measurement that tests for anatomical leg length discrepancy. • ASIS and medial malleolus are the landmarks identified Apparent Leg-Length Test • Reveals functional leg length discrepancy • Umbillicus and medial malleolus are landmarks • Evans Functional Leg-Length Measurement • Measure length of both lower extremities supine and seated • Inferior medial malloli are used as landmarks • Read the body language Functional Leg-Length Measurement • Usually the ipsilateral malleolus will measure short when supine if the superior iliac crest appears inferior when standing and long when seated Clinical Value of Long Sit Test • Pelvic Obliquity • Leg Length Discrepancy – Functional – Anatomical • SIJ Dysfunction • Spinal manipulation VIDEO: SUPINE TO LONG SIT TEST HTTP://WWW.THESTUDENTPHYSICALTHERAPIST.COM/SUPINE-TO-LONG- SIT-TEST.HTML LEVANGIE PK.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Pneumothorax Can Be Associated with TGFBR2 Mutation
    ERJ Express. Published on October 22, 2015 as doi: 10.1183/13993003.00952-2015 LETTER IN PRESS | CORRECTED PROOF Spontaneous pneumothorax can be associated with TGFBR2 mutation To the Editor: Primary pneumothorax affects 0.01% of the population. 10% of cases have a family history of pneumothorax but in the majority, a definitive genetic diagnosis is not made. We report a 26-year-old, white British woman who presented with left apical pneumothorax (figure 1a). Previously, she had migraines, multiple stress fractures in her right foot, myopia, easy bruising, lumbar scoliosis and spontaneous dislocation of the right patella. She had no previous history of pneumothoraces or any other respiratory problems, and had never smoked. On examination, she was hypermobile (Beighton score 7/9), and had facial milia, translucent hyperextensible skin, striae over her back, chest wall asymmetry, bilateral varicose veins and pes planus. Her uvula was bifid (figure 1b), she had a high arched palate with dental crowding and her arm span/ height ratio was increased (1.14). In the ophthalmology clinic, lattice dystrophy (weakness in the peripheral retina predisposing to retinal detachment) was identified with no ocular features of Marfan syndrome. The patient’s thoracic computed tomography (CT) revealed apical blebs, and her echocardiogram and CT showed aortic root dilatation (3.54 cm, Z-score >2) (figure 1c and d). Her 59-year-old mother, who had not suffered pneumothoraces, was reviewed and found to have mild features of a connective tissue disorder: skin hyperextensibility, joint hypermobility with a Beighton scale score of 5/9, a high-arched palate, mild thoracic kyphosis, easy bruising, recurrent left shoulder dislocation, hiatus hernia, stress incontinence and stress fractures of the left foot.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability of Measuring Thoracic Kyphosis Angle, Lumbar Lordosis Angle and Straight Leg Raise with an Inclinometer
    10 The Open Spine Journal, 2012, 4, 10-15 Open Access Reliability of Measuring Thoracic Kyphosis Angle, Lumbar Lordosis Angle and Straight Leg Raise with an Inclinometer Andrew S. Van Blommestein1, Jeremy S. Lewis2,3,4, Matthew C. Morrissey5, and Sian MacRae1,2,* 1Division of Applied Biomedical Research, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences; 2Therapy Department, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and 3Physiotherapy Department, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; 4Musculoskeletal Services, Central London Community Healthcare, London, UK; 5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Abstract: Purpose: Several non-invasive measurement methods have been described in the literature for recording thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and straight leg raise (SLR). However, attempts to quantify the reliability of the inclinometer in these measurements are scarce. In addition, existing reliability studies within the literature were found to use small sample sizes. The aim of this investigation was to examine the intra-rater reliability of the chief investigator (SM), in order to provide clinicians with data that will allow them to better measure sagittal spinal posture and SLR. A blinded test-retest design was performed to determine the intra-rater reliability of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and SLR when assessed using an Isomed inclinometer in normals. Methods. Thirty asymptomatic subjects were assessed on two occasions separated by a time interval of 1 hour to reduce investigator memory bias. Thoracic and lumbar measurements were recorded in a relaxed standing position using an inclinometer; SLR of the dominant leg was assessed with subjects in the supine position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and standard errors of measurement (SEM) were analysed to determine measurement reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Complications and Radiographic Correction in Adult Scoliosis
    Neurosurg Focus 28 (3):E7, 2010 Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation MATTHEW J. TOR M ENTI , M.D., MATTHEW B. MASERATI , M.D., CHRISTOPHER M. BONFIEL D , M.D., DAVI D O. OKONKWO , M.D., PH.D., AN D AD A M S. KANTER , M.D. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Object. The authors recently used a combined approach of minimally invasive transpsoas extreme lateral in- terbody fusion (XLIF) and open posterior segmental pedicle screw instrumentation with transforaminal lumbar in- terbody fusion (TLIF) for the correction of coronal deformity. The complications and radiographic outcomes were compared with a posterior-only approach for scoliosis correction. Methods. The authors retrospectively reviewed all deformity cases that were surgically corrected at the Uni- versity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital between June 2007 and August 2009. Eight patients underwent combined transpsoas and posterior approaches for adult degenerative thoracolumbar scoliosis. The com- parison group consisted of 4 adult patients who underwent a posterior-only scoliosis correction. Data on intra- and postoperative complications were collected. The pre- and postoperative posterior-anterior and lateral scoliosis series radiographic films were reviewed, and comparisons were made for coronal deformity, apical vertebral translation (AVT), and lumbar lordosis. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by comparing pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores. Results. The median preoperative coronal Cobb angle in the combined approach was 38.5° (range 18–80°). Fol- lowing surgery, the median Cobb angle was 10° (p < 0.0001). The mean preoperative AVT was 3.6 cm, improving to 1.8 cm postoperatively (p = 0.031).
    [Show full text]
  • Escobar Syndrome Associated with Spine and Orthopedic Pathologies
    tics: Cu ne rr e en G t y R r e a Balioglu, Hereditary Genet 2015, 4:2 t s i e d a e r r c DOI: 10.4172/2161-1041.1000145 e h H Hereditary Genetics ISSN: 2161-1041 Case Report Open Access Escobar Syndrome Associated with Spine and Orthopedic Pathologies: Case Reports and Literature Review Balioglu MB* Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Bone Disease Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey Abstract Escobar syndrome (ES) is associated with a web across every flexion crease in the extremities (most notably the popliteal space) and other structural anomalies such as a vertical talus, clubfoot, thoracic kyphoscoliosis and severe restrictive lung disease. In our study, we evaluated 3 patients diagnosed with multiple pterygium syndrome (MPS) type Escobar. The purpose of this study was to assess the abnormalities of the vertebrae and concomitant orthopedic pathologies. Two male patients (17 and 20-year-old siblings) and one female patient (9 year-old) were diagnosed with ES by genetic analysis. Patients had been diagnosed with kyphosis and progressive scoliosis (except one), high-set palate, ptosis, low-set ears, arachnodactyly, craniofacial dysmorphism, mild deafness, clubfoot, hip luxation, and joint contractures. Patients received operations for dislocation of the hip, clubfoot correction (except the female patient), and contractures of the knee and ankle. Furthermore, patients also underwent surgery for ptosis and inguinal hernias (except the female patient). One male patient received posterior vertebral instrumentation and fusion for a progressive spine deformity. Spinal and orthopedic pathologies commonly occur in patients with ES and scoliosis, and kyphosis may progress considerably over time.
    [Show full text]