Augmented Reality Navigation Map of Mountain Area
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bulgarian Pirin National Park, UNESCO World Heritage Site
Bulgarian Pirin National Park, UNESCO World Heritage Site Pirin National park is an UNESCO world heritage site because the exceptional beauty of the mountain scenery, glacial geomorphology, continuing evolution of flora, and an example of a functioning Balkan uplands ecosystem. The dominant part of the park is high mountain territory over 2,000 m. The diverse limestone mountain landscapes include over 70 glacial lakes and a range of glacial landforms, with many waterfalls, rocky screes and caves. Forests are dominated by conifers. Pirin’s natural coniferous forests include Macedonian Pine and Bosnian Pine, with many old growth trees. Endemic species for the Balkan and the Apenine Peninsula, the Bosnian Pine (Pinus heldreichii) is very special in Bulgaria, its forests are only met in Pirin and Slavyanka Mountains. A special Pirin landmark is a 1,300 years old tree of Bosnian Pine, known as “Baikusheva mura” – believed to be the oldest tree on the Balkan peninsula. The high mountain peaks and crags contrast with meadows, rivers and waterfalls and provide the opportunity to experience the aesthetics of a Balkan mountain landscape. NP Pirin includes a range of endemic and relict species that are representative of the Balkan Pleistocene flora. The park includes also one of the oldest reserves in Bulgaria – Bayuvi Dupki-Dzhindzhiritsa. Pirin National Park has long been subject to tourism pressure, largely caused by the development of ski facilities and ski runs, the main threat being the construction and development of Bansko ski zone on the northern slope of the Park. In 2011 a geodesic investigation of Bansko ski zone by the government proved that the ski zone concessionaire in fact uses a 65% larger area than the concession contract provides for. -
The Unknown Southernmost Glaciers of Europe the Unknown Southernmost Glaciers of Europe
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68899 Provisional chapter Chapter 4 The Unknown Southernmost Glaciers of Europe The Unknown Southernmost Glaciers of Europe Emil Gachev Emil Gachev Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68899 Abstract This chapter presents the perennial firn/ice patches in the mountains of the Balkan Peninsula. The detailed study of these features in the last decades has proved that many of them are, in fact, small glaciers. They have survived without complete melting since the end of the Little Ice Age, and thus the time of their formation must have not later than in 14–15th century AD. At present, the existence of 16 small glaciers is suggested (and proved for some of them) in three mountains throughout the peninsula: Prokletije (mainly in Albania), Durmitor (in Montenegro) and Pirin (in Bulgaria), the biggest num- ber being found in Prokletije. The two small glaciers (glacierets) in Pirin mountain are at present the southernmost glacial masses in Europe (the only located south of 42°N). Despite the registered warming of high mountain climate, small glaciers on the Balkan Peninsula have shown no trends towards shrinkage for the last 23 years. Keywords: small glaciers, snow patches, Pirin, Durmitor, Prokletije 1. Introduction Few mountains in Europe host classical glaciers at present: The Alps, the Great Caucasus range, the Scandinavian mountains, Polar Ural and the Pyrenees [1]. Apart from them, there are numerous small bodies of firn and ice in other mountain ranges across Europe which are still of a permanent character, with their mass moving down by gravity. -
Ecology & Safety ISSN 1314-7234, Volume 9, 2015 Journal Of
Ecology & Safety Journal of International Scientific Publications ISSN 1314-7234, Volume 9, 2015 www.scientific-publications.net SURFACE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN THE PIRIN NATIONAL PARK, BULGARIA Nadka Ignatova1, Meike-Laura Slijper2 1University of Forestry, Department of Plant Pathology and Chemistry, 10 Kliment Ohridski str, Sofia 1156, Bulgaria 2Van Hall Larenstein University, Environmental science, Water technology, 1 Agora str, Leeuwarden 8901, The Netherlands Abstract The protected area of Pirin National Park as a UNESCO heritage site is very important not only because of the exceptional biological diversity but also because of the water resources in a big quantity and excellent quality used for drinking water supply of all adjacent cities and villages, as well as for all human activities in this region. At the same time the Park is a very attractive touristic destination for people from all over the word both in winter and summer periods. From this point of view the protection of the surface water bodies at the catchment area of the Park against the pollution is a task of a great importance. The main objective of the study is to assess the quality of the main river and lake water bodies in the Pirin National Park. Data from the local monitoring on the water chemistry (electro- conductivity, temperature, pH, Biological Oxygen Demand, Chemical Oxygen Demand, as well as the concentration of Dissolved Oxygen, Suspended Particle Material, Dissolved + - 3- compounds, N-NH4 , N-NO3 , P-PO4 , Fe and Mn) for the period 2004-2013 have been treated statistically. During the periods of high and low water level in 2014 a visit to 28 river and lake water bodies at the territory of the Park has been organised for observation, sampling for water chemistry, analysing and measuring of some parameters in the field. -
CUERPO DIRECTIVO Dra
CUERPO DIRECTIVO Dra. Nidia Burgos Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina Directores Dr. Juan Guillermo Mansilla Sepúlveda Mg. María Eugenia Campos Universidad Católica de Temuco, Chile Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Dr. Francisco Ganga Contreras Universidad de Los Lagos, Chile Dr. Francisco José Francisco Carrera Universidad de Valladolid, España Subdirectores Mg © Carolina Cabezas Cáceres Mg. Keri González Universidad de Las Américas, Chile Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, México Dr. Andrea Mutolo Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, México Dr. Pablo Guadarrama González Universidad Central de Las Villas, Cuba Editor Drdo. Juan Guillermo Estay Sepúlveda Mg. Amelia Herrera Lavanchy Editorial Cuadernos de Sofía, Chile Universidad de La Serena, Chile Editor Científico Mg. Cecilia Jofré Muñoz Dr. Luiz Alberto David Araujo Universidad San Sebastián, Chile Pontificia Universidade Católica de Sao Paulo, Brasil Mg. Mario Lagomarsino Montoya Editor Brasil Universidad Adventista de Chile, Chile Drdo. Maicon Herverton Lino Ferreira da Silva Universidade da Pernambuco, Brasil Dr. Claudio Llanos Reyes Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile Editor Ruropa del Este Dr. Alekzandar Ivanov Katrandhiev Dr. Werner Mackenbach Universidad Suroeste "Neofit Rilski", Bulgaria Universidad de Potsdam, Alemania Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica Cuerpo Asistente Mg. Rocío del Pilar Martínez Marín Traductora: Inglés Universidad de Santander, Colombia Lic. Pauline Corthorn Escudero Editorial Cuadernos de Sofía, Chile Ph. D. Natalia Milanesio Universidad de Houston, Estados Unidos Traductora: Portugués Lic. Elaine Cristina Pereira Menegón Dra. Patricia Virginia Moggia Münchmeyer Editorial Cuadernos de Sofía, Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile Portada Ph. D. Maritza Montero Sr. Felipe Maximiliano Estay Guerrero Universidad Central de Venezuela, Venezuela Editorial Cuadernos de Sofía, Chile Dra. -
The Unknown Southernmost Glaciers of Europe
Chapter 4 The Unknown Southernmost Glaciers of Europe Emil Gachev Emil Gachev Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68899 Abstract This chapter presents the perennial firn/ice patches in the mountains of the Balkan Peninsula. The detailed study of these features in the last decades has proved that many of them are, in fact, small glaciers. They have survived without complete melting since the end of the Little Ice Age, and thus the time of their formation must have not later than in 14–15th century AD. At present, the existence of 16 small glaciers is suggested (and proved for some of them) in three mountains throughout the peninsula: Prokletije (mainly in Albania), Durmitor (in Montenegro) and Pirin (in Bulgaria), the biggest num- ber being found in Prokletije. The two small glaciers (glacierets) in Pirin mountain are at present the southernmost glacial masses in Europe (the only located south of 42°N). Despite the registered warming of high mountain climate, small glaciers on the Balkan Peninsula have shown no trends towards shrinkage for the last 23 years. Keywords: small glaciers, snow patches, Pirin, Durmitor, Prokletije 1. Introduction Few mountains in Europe host classical glaciers at present: The Alps, the Great Caucasus range, the Scandinavian mountains, Polar Ural and the Pyrenees [1]. Apart from them, there are numerous small bodies of firn and ice in other mountain ranges across Europe which are still of a permanent character, with their mass moving down by gravity. -
Development and Implementation of an Ecological Monitoring System in the National Parks Report January – June, 2003
Biodiversity Conservation & Economic Growth (BCEG) Project Development and Implementation of an Ecological Monitoring System in the National Parks Report January – June, 2003 Submitted by: Dimitrina Boteva Biodiversity Specialist BCEG Project Bulgaria Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth Project is a collaborative initiative between the United States Agency for International Development and the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria implemented by Associates in Rural Development, Inc. Project Number LAG-I-00-99-00013-00, Task Order 01 June, 2003 Sofia, Bulgaria June, 2003 Biodiversity Conservation & Economic Growth Project Contents Abbreviations iii Preface iv Introduction v Acknowledgements vi 1. Working meeting for development and implementation of an Ecological 1 Monitoring System in the National Parks - 16 January 2003 2. Working meeting for elaborating and implementing an Ecological Monitoring 3 System in the National Parks, 20 February 2003, Environmental Executive Agency 3. Activities of NP Directorates, EEA and Regional Inspectorates of Environment 5 and Waters for implementing the Action Plan of the working meeting - 20 February 2003 4. Recommendations for future development and implementation of the 7 Monitoring System in the National Parks 5. Regions selected for complex ecological monitoring in the National Parks 9 5.1 Description of the regions subject to complex monitoring in the territory of 9 Rila NP 5.2 Description of the regions subject to complex monitoring in the territory of 16 Central Balkan NP 5.3 Description of the regions subject to complex monitoring in the territory of 19 Pirin NP 6. List of the selected objects for monitoring in the National Parks 25 7. Matrixes for ecological monitoring of the objects in the National Parks 27 7.1 Matrix for Rila NP 29 7.2 Matrix for Central Balkan NP 43 7.3 Matrix for Pirin NP 57 8. -
“Road Map” for Revision of the Bulgarian Biosphere
“ROAD MAP” FOR REVISION OF THE BULGARIAN BIOSPHERE RESERVES DESIGNATED UNDER UNESCO’S MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE PROGRAMME “ROAD MAP” FOR REVISION OF THE BULGARIAN BIOSPHERE RESERVES DESIGNATED UNDER UNESCO’S MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE PROGRAMME CURRENT STATE Bulgaria has 16 Biosphere reservesn (BR) all designated in 1977 – Alibotush, Bayuvi Dupki - Dzhindzhiritsa, Bistrishko Branishte, Boatin, Chervenata stena, Chuprene, Dzhendema, Dupkata, Kamchia, Kupena, Mantaritsa, Uzunbudzhak, Parangalitsa, Srebarna, Steneto, Tsarichina. They were selected to represent typical ecosystems with relatively untouched biotic and abiotic components and are more or less evenly distributed throughout the country. All BRs belong to the first generation of Biosphere Reserves, designated long before the adoption of the Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework, and thus, they were established only with core zones. So, only the conservation and partly the logistic support funtions, related to research and biodiversity monitoring have been taking place. None of the 16 Bulgarian BRs coressponds to the zoning and functional requirements of the Seville Strategy and Statutory framework, adopted in 1995. Fifteen BRs are strict reserves and one (Srebarna) is a managed reserve according to the Bulgarian legislation. These categories are very strict and do not allow any human activities related to sustainable usage of natural resources. According to the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria (Article 18) and the Protected Areas Act - PAA (Article 8, paragraph 1), the strict and managed reserves are exclusive state property and are managed by the respective governmental institutions and their branches, i.e. the Ministry of Environment and Water (MOEW) and the Regional Inspectorates of Environment and Water (RIEW). -
Biosphere Reserves in Bulgaria and Their Forest Genetic Resources
Silva Balcanica, 12(1)/2011 BIOSPHERE RESERVES IN BULGARIA AND THEIR FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES Nadezhda Stoyanova, Dimitar Dimitrov, Georgi P. Georgiev, Alexander Delkov Forest Research Institute – Sofia Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Abstract Protected territories play important role in conservation of biological diversity both in regional and global aspect. Biosphere reserves in mountains of Bulgaria include valuable populations, representatives of families Pinaceae, Fagaceae, etc. In biosphere reserves, object of this study, tree species differ according to their distribution and share in the composition of dendrocoenoses. It was determined that best represented in biosphere reserves in Bulgaria are Norway spruce and beech forests in areas over 800-900 m a.s.l., and relatively less represented are oaks, Scots pine and Austrian black pine. Large number of formed forest ecosystems in these protected territories is distinguished for their high productivity, vitality, long life and good genetic-and-breeding characteristics. Key words: ecology, protected territories, mountains, plant biodiversity, forest phytocoenoses INTRODUCTION Preserving of forest tree genetic resources is of big importance for biological diversity conservation in forest ecosystems, particularly in mountain territories. Reserves are protected territories with undisturbed nature under strict regime of protection mainly because of their primary character and scientific value as nature standards. Through scientific analysis it is possible to determine the status not only of single vegetation components but also to study factors, which determine the natural productivity of ecosystems in reserves. Alexandrov (1990) has pointed out that the category maintained reserves in Bulgaria also includes small forest reserves, where, besides the big number of polytopic forest tree species typical for almost whole Europe, numerous endemic species are conserved, among them Pinus peuce Griseb. -
Two-Winged Insects (Insecta: Diptera) of Pirin
Historia naturalis bulgarica, 21: 215-256, 2015 Two-winged insects (Insecta: Diptera) of Pirin Zdravko Hubenov Abstract: A total of 742 two-winged species that belong to 43 families have been reported from Pirin Mt. The larger number of species (394 species, or 53.2%) has been found in the beech forest belt. The established species belong to 72 areo- graphical categories. The dipterous fauna can be divided into 2 main groups: 1) species with Mediterranean type of distribution (48 species, or 6.4%) – more thermophilic and distributed mainly in the southern parts of the Palaearctic. Five species of southern type, distributed in the Palaearctic and beyond it, can be formally related to this group as well; 2) species with Palaearctic and Eurosiberian type of distribution (694 species, or 93.6%) – more cold-resistant and widely distributed in the Palaearctic. 155 species of northern type, distributed in the Palaearctic and beyond it, can be formally related to this group as well. The zoogeographical character of the Tachinidae fauna is determined by the second group. The ration of the two groups is different in the separate vegetation belts of Pirin Mt. Key words: Diptera, Bulgaria, Pirin Mt., faunistic composition Introduction The first data for Diptera of Pirin Mt. are report- 2002, 2004; Dzhambazov & Beshovski, 2000; ed by Drensky (1929). Between the two world wars Langourov, 2001; Černi & Merz, 2006). The hy- Drensky (1934, 1939, 1943), Valkanov (1941) and drobiological (Valkanov, 1941; Stoichev, 1996) Delkeskamp (1942) published separate data about and biospeleological (Beron, 2006) studies have a the mountain. In the next period of 14 years there faunistic contribution. -
Breeding and Genetic Resources of Five-Needle Pines: Growth, Adaptability, and Pest Resistance; 2001 July 23-27; Medford, OR, USA
United States Department of Agriculture Breeding and Genetic Forest Service Resources of Five- Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings Needle Pines: RMRS-P-32 May 2004 Growth, Adaptability, and Pest Resistance IUFRO Working Party 2.02.15 International Conference Medford, Oregon, USA July 23-27, 2001 Abstract ___________________________________________________ Sniezko, Richard A.; Samman, Safiya; Schlarbaum, Scott E.; Kriebel, Howard B. eds. 2004. Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability, and pest resistance; 2001 July 23-27; Medford, OR, USA. IUFRO Working Party 2.02.15. Proceedings RMRS-P-32. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 259 p. This volume presents 29 overview and research papers on the breeding, genetic variation, genecology, gene conservation, and pest resistance of five-needle pines (Pinus L. subgenus Strobus Lemm.) from throughout the world. Overview papers provide information on past and present research as well as future needs for research on white pines from North America, Europe, and Asia. Research papers, more narrowly focused, cover various aspects of genetics. Throughout the distribution of five-needle pines, but particularly in many of the nine North American species, the pathogen Cronartium ribicola J.C. Fisch. continues to cause high levels of mortality and threatens ecosystems and plantations. Studies on genetic resistance to C. ribicola are described in papers from different regions of the world. Use of P. strobus as an exotic species in Europe and Russia and corresponding problems with white pine blister rust are discussed in several papers. Other papers focus on examining and exploiting patterns of genetic variation of different species. -
Bulgaria 2020 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
Voluntary National Review SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS Bulgaria 2020 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all 7. Ensure access to a!ordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat deserti"cation, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build e!ective, accountable and inclusive institutions -
Sc-17/Conf.229/15 United Nations Educational
SC-17/CONF.229/15 Paris, 15 June 2017 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION International Co-ordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme Twenty-ninth session UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, Room IV (Fontenoy Building) 12 – 15 June 2017 DRAFT REPORT The Secretariat of the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information or documentation provided by States to the Secretariat of UNESCO. The publication of any such advice, opinion, statement or other information or documentation on UNESCO’s website and/or on working documents also does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its boundaries. List of contents Item Page I. Opening by the Chair of the ICC 2 II. Opening remarks of the Director-General of UNESCO 2 III. Report of the Chair of the ICC (full report in Annex 2) 3 IV. Adoption of the agenda and timetable 4 V. Report of the Secretary of the MAB Programme 4 VI. Reports on actions undertaken by Member States / regional and thematic MAB Networks in the context of MAB with a focus on the Lima Action Plan 8 VII. Implementation of the Exit Strategy 15 VIII. Periodic Review Reports and Follow-Up Information Received since the last MAB International Coordinating Council (MAB ICC) Meeting 20 A. Recommendations for New Periodic Review Reports 21 B. Follow-Up Information Received since the last MAB MAB ICC Meeting 69 IX.