French Ambition and Acadian Labor in the Caribbean, 1762-1767”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

French Ambition and Acadian Labor in the Caribbean, 1762-1767” 401 “Empire Ex Nihilo: French Ambition and Acadian Labor in the Caribbean, 1762-1767” Christopher Hodson, Northwestern University “Lost Colonies” Conference, March 26-27, 2004 (Please do not cite, quote, or circulate without written permission from the author) At the conclusion of the Seven Years’ War in 1763, geopolitical equilibrium gave way to grotesque imbalance. Great Britain had become a leviathan, acquiring Canada, several key islands in the West Indies, Senegal in Africa, French possessions in the Mediterranean, India, and on the East Indian island of Sumatra, while crushing Gallic pretensions to the Ohio Valley. For Louis XV and his cast of ministers, utter defeat had raised the stakes of the imperial contest; Britain’s near-global dominance demanded a rapid, thorough response. The integration of France’s remaining overseas territories into a militant, economically competitive polity became the penultimate projet in a kingdom bursting with les hommes à projets.1 Draped in the rhetoric of progress, the plans that emerged from this hothouse of patriotism and personal ambition marked an extension of imperial authority unlike any France had ever seen.2 Mercifully, few of these bizarre proposals ever came to fruition. This essay, however, examines two that did. The first, a colony along the Kourou River in Guiana, failed in spectacular fashion only months after its foundation. Thousands of migrants died, and destitute survivors scattered throughout Europe and the Caribbean. The second, a smaller settlement on the northern coast of Saint Domingue, commenced early in 1764. It proved a disappointment, lapsing into obscurity over the next two years. Settlers died or filtered to greener, if equally fetid pastures in Louisiana. Both projects shared a unique trait. In the Caribbean, where the trade in African slaves thrived like few places on earth, these colonies were built by an unlikely workforce: Acadian refugees. 1 I have borrowed the term “hommes à projets” from the work of Robert Darnton, especially The Literary Underground of the Old Regime (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), 78. 2 Prior to 1763, only a scattered few French officials envisioned the kingdom’s overseas possessions as an integrated “empire.” See Kenneth Banks, Chasing Empire Across the Sea: Communications and the State in the French Atlantic, 1713-1763 (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002), 7. 402 These men, women, and children hailed from the tidal inlets of what had once been the French colony of Acadia, transformed into the British province of Nova Scotia by the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. After living in uneasy coexistence with their would-be governors for forty years, they endured a remarkable misfortune as the Seven Years’ War opened. In the fall of 1755, the British military captured and deported seven thousand “neutral French,” scattering those who escaped their grasp deep into the wilderness. Fearful of their ability to recombine and commit what one Briton described as “some signal Mischiefs,” officials scattered the prisoners from Boston to Savannah, scandalizing the colonial governments charged with their maintenance.3 Assaults continued as the war progressed. Fresh from the conquest of Louisbourg in 1758, British troops captured three thousand Acadians on Ile St. Jean (now Prince Edward Island), most of whom had taken refuge from the initial forays of the 1755 deportation. Packed aboard leaky transports, these unfortunates were sent to seaports along the northern and western coasts of France.4 At the signing of the Treaty of Paris, ten thousand Acadians across the Atlantic littoral bided time in a kind of legal limbo. While officials in the British Empire had, in the words of Governor Francis Bernard of Massachusetts, “always considered these people as British subjects,” the expulsion had rendered such claims hollow.5 Like the Israelites “in Egypt, under Pharaoh, and in Babylon, under Nebuchadnezzar,” those held in Philadelphia could not say “whether we are Subjects, Prisoners, Slaves, or Freemen.”6 Many wanted reunion with France, but obstacles littered the path. Acadians in North America feared that Louis XV, whose debt had mounted, would neither “reclaim them as subjects…[nor] redeem them as captives.”7 For those already ensconced in French ports, an uncertain future awaited. From La Rochelle to Dunkerque, three thousand refugees lived on government charity and clung to promises of resettlement, they knew not where. 3 Boston Gazette, August 23, 1756. 4 See D.C Harvey, The French Régime in Prince Edward Island (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1926); J.M. Bumsted, Land, Settlement, and Politics on Eighteenth-Century Prince Edward Island (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1987); Earle Lockerby, “The Deportation of the Acadians from Ile St. Jean, 1758,” Acadiensis, vol. 27, no. 2 (1998), 45-94. 5 Francis Bernard to House of Representatives, January 1765, in Placide Gaudet, ed., Rapport Concernant les Archives Canadiennes pour l’année 1905, vol. II (Ottawa: 1909), 150-1. 6 Petition of Oliver Tibaudat, et al., to the Assembly of Pennsylvania, February 8, 1757, in Pennsylvania Archives, series 8, vol. 6, 4509-10. 7 Duc de Nivernais, “Mémoire sur les Acadiens,” 17 February 1763, London, Archives du Ministère des Affaires Etrangères (hereafter AMAE), Correspondance Politique, Angleterre, vol. 449, 77. 403 By 1763, however, handwriting had appeared on the wall. Faced with a spendthrift crown bent on revenge, Caribbean projects loomed on the Acadians’ horizon.8 This essay treats the Acadians’ tropical misadventures as social manifestations of this radical moment in French imperialism and political economics. Like most colonial powers, France relied on enslaved Africans to create wealth. During the early eighteenth century, planters and merchants had little choice – efforts to induce Frenchmen to migrate had floundered, as had attempts to use engagés and prisoners, notably in John Law’s Louisiana.9 Amplified by the prescient antislavery thought of the Physiocrats, the outcome of the Seven Years’ War prompted many in the Francophone world to question the composition of their colonial population. If, as the politics of the day seemed to warrant, the crown took control of overseas development in response to the British threat, slaves were far too expensive. Prices had skyrocketed, and would rise by 1789 to over two thousand livres for a healthy African in the French Caribbean.10 Worse, a slave’s loyalty could be purchased or stolen along with the body, rendering Africans unreliable in time of war. With armed conflict woven into the fabric of past experience and expected in France’s near future, the idea of an “empire without slaves” – or, at the very least, an empire with fewer completely unfree workers than ever before – gained a brief hearing immediately after 1763.11 This, then, is a story of a world in which prosperous, acquisitive peasants actually replaced African slaves, working to their deaths in imperial experiments thousands of miles from their homes. As historians are now apt to tell us, displacement, movement, and interaction shaped all sorts of lives in all sorts of places in the Atlantic World – Irish servants in Williamsburg, Africans quantified in Barbados, British sailors impressed in 8 Acadians who took refuge in France were also employed in a settlement on the Falkland Islands, and were proposed as settlers for Corsica, Ile de France, Ile de Kerguelen, several agricultural colonies within France itself, and were even tapped to work in French mines. For a review of some of these projects, see Ernest Martin, Les exilés acadiens en France au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: 1936). 9 Peter Moogk, “Reluctant Exiles: Emigtrants from France in Canada before 1760,” William and Mary Quarterly 10 James E. McClellan III, Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue and the Old Regime (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1992), 53-4. 11 I have, of course, cribbed this term from Christopher L. Brown, “Empire Without Slaves: British Concepts of Emancipation in the Era of the American Revolution,” William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 2 (April 1999), 273-306. For a good summary of French criticisms of slave labor that emerged during the 1780s, see especially Laurent Dubois, “’The Price of Liberty’: Victor Hugues and the Administration of Freedom in Guadeloupe, 1794-1798,” William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 2 (April 1999), 363-392. 404 the taverns of Plymouth, the Greeks of Florida’s New Smyrna, and Acadians, hapless everywhere. Yet in this historiography, the effects of incessant motion – transnational identities, diasporic hybridity, and the like – often overshadow the forces that compelled it. Read in light of present-day multiculturalism, the sheer human diversity of the entire system has become mesmerizing and familiar. As NGOs, multinational corporations, and digitized bits of subversive information gnaw at the integrity of our political borders, scholars have found common cause with those who transcended the strictures of empire. In effect, we have found the early modern Atlantic World, and it is us.12 Models that privilege Atlantic movement and interaction, however, should not obscure coercion and commodification, even among once-peaceful groups from the wilds of Canada. Although removed from their “ancient habitations,” the Acadians’ tale is not one of simple expropriation. The refugees were, after all, given land in both Guiana and Saint Domingue. But the use of farmers like Acadians to satisfy the new French
Recommended publications
  • The Siege of Fort Beauséjour by Chris M. Hand Notes
    1 The Siege of Fort Beauséjour by Chris M. Hand Notes Early Conflict in Nova Scotia 1604-1749. By the end of the 1600’s the area was decidedly French. 1713 Treaty of Utrecht After nearly 25 years of continuous war, France ceded Acadia to Britain. French and English disagreed over what actually made up Acadia. The British claimed all of Acadia, the current province of New Brunswick and parts of the current state of Maine. The French conceded Nova Scotia proper but refused to concede what is now New Brunswick and northern Maine, as well as modern Prince Edward Island and Cape Breton. They also chose to limit British ownership along the Chignecto Isthmus and also harboured ambitions to win back the peninsula and most of the Acadian settlers who, after 1713, became subjects of the British Crown. The defacto frontier lay along the Chignecto Isthmus which separates the Bay of Fundy from the Northumberland Strait on the north. Without the Isthmus and the river system to the west, France’s greatest colony along the St. Lawrence River would be completely cut off from November to April. Chignecto was the halfway house between Quebec and Louisbourg. 1721 Paul Mascarene, British governor of Nova Scotia, suggested that a small fort could be built on the neck with a garrison of 150 men. a) one atthe ridge of land at the Acadian town of Beaubassin (now Fort Lawrence) or b) one more west on the more prominent Beauséjour ridge. This never happened because British were busy fighting Mi’kmaq who were incited and abetted by the French.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire, Racial Capitalism and International Law: the Case of Manumitted Haiti and the Recognition Debt
    Leiden Journal of International Law (2018), 31, pp. 597–615 C Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2018 doi:10.1017/S0922156518000225 INTERNATIONAL LEGAL THEORY Empire, Racial Capitalism and International Law: The Case of Manumitted Haiti and the Recognition Debt ∗ LILIANA OBREGON´ Abstract Before 1492, European feudal practices racialized subjects in order to dispossess, enslave and colonize them. Enslavement of different peoples was a centuries old custom authorized by the lawofnationsandfundamentaltotheeconomiesofempire.Manumission,thoughexceptional, helped to sustain slavery because it created an expectation of freedom, despite the fact that the freed received punitive consequences. In the sixteenth century, as European empires searched for cheaper and more abundant sources of labour with which to exploit their colonies, the Atlantic slave trade grew exponentially as slaves became equated with racialized subjects. This article presents the case of Haiti as an example of continued imperial practices sustained by racial capitalism and the law of nations. In 1789, half a million slaves overthrew their French masters from the colony of Saint Domingue. After decades of defeating recolonization efforts and the loss of almost half their population and resources, Haitian leaders believed their declared independence of 1804 was insufficient, so in 1825 they reluctantly accepted recognition by France while being forced to pay an onerous indemnity debt. Though Haiti was manumitted through the promise of a debt payment, at the same time the new state was re-enslaved as France’s commercial colony. The indemnity debt had consequences for Haiti well into the current century, as today Haiti is one of the poorest and most dependent nations in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Francophone Courses in United States Colleges and Universities
    Francophone Courses in United States Colleges and Universities Abdellatif Attafi College of Charleston ABSTRACT In undergraduate programs in the U.S, Francophone literature and culture courses are generating more and more interest among students courses are offered in more institutions than in the past but when these courses are offered, they are often optional and rarely mandatory. In order to examine how many Francophone literature and culture courses are offered and required for students, we reviewed 63 French department course catalogs from 63 different sized universities—both public and private—from a variety of geographic regions. The discussion of the results is preceded by a brief synopsis of Francophone history, from the birth of the concept to the present. In the analysis of the results, the importanc of Francophone literature and culture courses for both students and universities is stressed. The Evolution of “Francophone” Culture and Literature First used in 1880 by Onésisme Reclus (1837-1916), a nationalistic and patriotic geographer, the term Francophone referred to group of people and countries outside of France that used the French language at one or more levels. Currently, Francophone countries include Belgium, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Canada, Lebanon, Haiti, former French colonies, Départements d’Outres-Mer (DOM), and Territoires d’Outres- Mer (TOM). In 1880, the concept of Francophonie was part of a larger process of maintaining and extending French power and wealth in the context of increased competition within Europe. France had recently suffered defeat by the Prussian army (in 1871) and was looking for new territories outside of Europe (Farandjis, 2004). French politicians of that era, convinced by the economic benefits of colonialism, passed legislation that financed the military colonization of territory from Vietnam to North and Sub-Saharan Africa, a process completed within the first quarter of the 20th century (Nouschi, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • French Secular Music in Saint-Domingue (1750-1795) Viewed As a Factor in America's Musical Growth. John G
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1971 French Secular Music in Saint-Domingue (1750-1795) Viewed as a Factor in America's Musical Growth. John G. Cale Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cale, John G., "French Secular Music in Saint-Domingue (1750-1795) Viewed as a Factor in America's Musical Growth." (1971). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2112. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2112 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 72-17,750 CALE, John G., 1922- FRENCH SECULAR MUSIC IN SAINT-DOMINGUE (1750-1795) VIEWED AS A FACTOR IN AMERICA'S MUSICAL GROWTH. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College;, Ph.D., 1971 Music I University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FRENCH SECULAR MUSIC IN SAINT-DOMINGUE (1750-1795) VIEWED AS A FACTOR IN AMERICA'S MUSICAL GROWTH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Music by John G. Cale B.M., Louisiana State University, 1943 M.A., University of Michigan, 1949 December, 1971 PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of New France / by Prof. Frederick J. Turner
    AN UNFAMILIAR ESSAY BY FREDERICK J.TURNER Quite early In his professional career Professor Turner evinced an Interest in immigration problems, historically considered, as a particular aspect of his central interest — the study of the territorial advance of the American popula­ tion. In the course of a review of Roosevelt's Winning of the West, In 1889 Turner wrote: To this valley, also, have come migrations from the Old World such as can be compared only with the great Wandering of the Peoples — the Volkerwanderung — of the Middle Ages. A new composite na­ tionality is being produced, a distinct American people, speaking the English tongue, but not English.^ Once his period of apprenticeship was completed—It ter­ minated when Johns Hopkins conferred the doctorate In 1890 — Turner seized the opportunity of planning research projects In this inviting field. As his seminar topic for the college year 1890—91, he selected the study of immigration into Wisconsin.^ Turner's approach to the subject was broad and philosophical. Wisconsin had been rocked by controversies between natives and foreign-born, the latter strongly resenting the enactment of the Bennett Law, which prescribed that all schools in the state should give a portion, of their Instruction In the English language. To the schol­ ar's mind it was clear that immigration, historically treated, opened the gate to a better understanding between native and foreigner. Toward the close of 1891 Turner published an essay on the "Philosophy of History," in the course of which he took occasion to remark: "^The Dial (Chicago), 10:71 (August, 1889).
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Beausejour National Historic Park Aulac, New Brunswick Canada
    Fort Beausejour National Historic Park Aulac, New Brunswick Canada Issued under the authority of the HONOURABLE ARTHUR LAING, P.C., M.P., B.S.A. Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Original Earthen Bastion of French Period Fort Beausejour National Historic Park Aulac, New Brunswick At the middle of the 18th century the dividing line between French and British influence in Acadia lay along the Missaguash River, one of the four rivers that drain the southern slope of the Isthmus of Chignecto. In 1710 New England militiamen and British regulars had captured the French Port Royal, thus in one engagement effecting the conquest of the Nova Scotia main- land. The Treaty of Utrecht, concluded three years later, formally transferred Acadia to Great Britain. But what was Acadia? The British hopefully believed parts of what is now New Brunswick were included. The French, confident that they would soon win back the Nova Scotia mainland, could not consider such a broad definition of the geographical limits of Acadia. They were determined to hold as much ground as they could. Time seemed to be in their favor. Against the weak and ill-disciplined garrison at Annapolis Royal and the few detachments occupying isolated posts in the peninsula, the French could send Indian raiding parties. While the British struggled against the harassments of the Indians, the population of Acadia—over­ whelmingly French—could be provoked to at least passive resistance against their alien conquerors. French power preserved at the Fortress of Louisbourg on Cape Breton Island and at the settlements of New France along the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Foreign Missions
    One Hundred and Tenth ANNUAL BOARD OF FOREIGN MISSIONS Reformed Church in America 19 4 2 'Bax w- 1 1 0 REFORMED CHURCH HEADQUARTERS 156 FIFTH AVENUE NEW YORK Board of Foreign Missions MEMBERS OF THE BOARD 1939-1942 Rev. Paul H. Achtermann Rev. Joseph R. Sizoo, D.D. Rev. James E. Hoffman Mr. Clifford P. Case Rev. Bernard J. Mulder, D.D. Mr. Donald Mackenzie Rev. Harry W. Noble, D.D. Dr. Leland Rex Robinson 1940-1943 Rev. L. A. Brunsting Rev. David Van Strien Rev. Edward Dawson, D.D. Rev. Anthony Van Westenburg Rev. Garret Hondelink Rev. G. J. Wullschleger Rev. E. F. Romig, D.D. Mr. F. E. Smith Mr. W. Lloyd Van Keuren 1941-1944 Rev. J. W. Beardslee, Ph.D. Rev. Milton T. Stauffer, D.D. Rev. J. R. Euwema Rev. J. H. Warnshuis, D.D. Rev. Harry J. Hager, Ph.D. Mr. W. T. Hakken Rev. Harold W. Schenck Mr. F. W. Jansen Mr. Herman Vanderwart Honorary Members—Rev. Wm. Bancroft Hill, Litt, D. Rev. T. H. Mackenzie, D.D. OFFICERS OF THE BOARD President—Rev. Edward Dawson, D.D. Vice-President—Rev. J. W. Beardslee, Ph.D. Recording Secretary—Rev. Milton T. Stauffer, D.D. Corresponding Secretaries— Mr. F. M. Potter, L.H.D. Rev. L. J. Shafer, Litt. D. Treasurer—Mr. F. M. Potter, L.H.D. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Rev. J. W. Beardslee, Chairman Rev. Harold W. Schenck Rev. J. H. Warnshuis Rev. Milton T. Stauffer Mr. Clifford P. Case Rev. David Van Strien Dr. Leland Rex Robinson Rev. Anthony Van Westenburg Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesaʼs 51St Annual Meeting
    PRELIMINARY PROGRAM VER. 10-12-17 Jake McGuire Destination DC MESAʼs 51st Annual Meeting Washington DC November 18-21 We return to DC for MESA’s 51st annual meeting at the Washington Marriott Wardman Park Hotel where we have met every three years since 1999. The hotel is located in a lovely residential area near the National Zoo, but a nearby stop on the metro red line makes all parts of DC easily accessible. The program of 230+ sessions (see pages 12-51) spread over four days will offer a smorgasbord to whet the appetite of any Middle East studies aficionado. MESA’s affiliate groups meet mostly on Saturday, November 18 (see pages 10-11) and the first program session begins that day at 5:30pm. Panels run all day Sunday and Monday and end at 3pm on Tuesday. The book bazaar will be open Sunday and Monday from 9am to 6pm and on Tuesday from 8am to 12pm (see pages 8-9). MESAʼs ever-popular FilmFest (see the teaser on pages 6-7) begins screenings on Saturday morning and runs through Tuesday until around 2pm. The MESA Presidential Address & Awards will be held Sunday evening from 6pm to 7:30pm, and the MESA Members Meeting on Monday evening from 6pm to 8:00pm. As you will see, it’s business as usual, except of course for a new administration that is determined to ban nationals of six Muslim majority countries from traveling to the US, and MESA having joined a lawsuit against the ban that is making its way to the US Supreme Court in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Women of New France
    Women of New France Introducing New France Today it may be hard to imagine that vast regions of the North American continent were once claimed, and effectively controlled, by France. By 1763 some 70,000 French speakers based primarily in what is now the province of Quebec, managed to keep well over 1,000,000 British subjects confined to the Atlantic seaboard from Maine to Florida. France claimed land that included 15 current states, including all of Michigan. The early history of North America is a story of struggle for control of land and resources by Women in New France French settlers in Nouvelle France (New France in English), English settlers We know very little about the everyday lives of people in what in the Thirteen Colonies, and Native peoples who already lived in the areas was New France, particularly the women. Native women, from a that became the US and Canada. wide range of nations along the St. Lawrence and Great Lakes river system, had lived in North America for thousands of years before the arrival of French explorers. While there was a good deal of variety among Indian societies, most Native women lived more independent lives than did their European counterparts. In some societies, in addition to the usual child-rearing and household economy practices, Native women had real political power and could elect village and tribal leaders. New France 1719 European Women’s Roles European women’s lives, like those of their Native American counterparts, were shaped by the legal, cultural, and religious values of their society.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Code Noir (1724) BLACK CODE of LOUISIANA I. Decrees
    Louisiana’s Code Noir (1724) BLACK CODE OF LOUISIANA I. Decrees the expulsion of Jews from the colony. II. Makes it imperative on masters to impart religious instruction to their slaves. III. Permits the exercise of the Roman Catholic creed only. Every other mode of worship is prohibited. IV. Negroes placed under the direction or supervision of any other person than a Catholic, are liable to confiscation. V. Sundays and holidays are to be strictly observed. All negroes found at work on these days are to be confiscated. VI. We forbid our white subjects, of both sexes, to marry with the blacks, under the penalty of being fined and subjected to some other arbitrary punishment. We forbid all curates, priests, or missionaries of our secular or regular clergy, and even our chaplains in our navy to sanction such marriages. We also forbid all our white subjects, and even the manumitted or free-born blacks, to live in a state of concubinage with blacks. Should there be any issue from this kind of intercourse, it is our will that the person so offending, and the master of the slave, should pay each a fine of three hundred livres. Should said issue be the result of the concubinage of the master with his slave, said master shall not only pay the fine, but be deprived of the slave and of the children, who shall be adjudged to the hospital of the locality, and said slaves shall be forever incapable of being set free. But should this illicit intercourse have existed between a free black and his slave, when said free black had no legitimate wife, and should said black marry said slave according to the forms prescribed by the church, said slave shall be thereby set free, and the children shall also become free and legitimate ; and in such a case, there shall be no application of the penalties mentioned in the present article.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery in Haiti
    Africa Enslaved A Curriculum Unit on Comparative Slave Systems for Grades 9-12 Developed by: Natalie Arsenault, Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies Christopher Rose, Center for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Texas at Austin About the Authors Natalie Arsenault is Outreach Coordinator at the Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. She holds an M.A. in Latin American Studies from the University of Florida. She has worked extensively on Latin American content-based activities with educators at all levels; has present- ed on her own research at regional and national educator conferences; and has developed multiple standards- aligned curriculum units related to Latin America. She can be reached at [email protected] Christopher Rose is Outreach Coordinator at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Texas at Austin, where he obtained his M.A. in Middle Eastern Studies. He is responsible for educational outreach to classrooms, business, the media, and community groups to increase awareness on matters related to the Middle East and its many diverse cultures. He is a frequent guest speaker in schools throughout the Austin area, and he has developed many curriculum resources to supplement K-12 curricula in world studies. He can be reached at [email protected] Africa Enslaved: A Curriculum Unit on Comparative Slave Systems for Grades 9 -12 Compilation date: March 2006 Permission is granted to reproduce this unit for classroom use only. Please do not redistribute this unit without prior permission. For more information, please see: http://inic.utexas.edu/hemispheres/ Cover photo: The slave monument, Stone Town, Zanzibar, Tanzania © 2003, Christopher Rose 3 Haiti CIA World Factbook, 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Acadia National Park Visitor Study
    Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Acadia National Park Visitor Study Summer 2009 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 221 Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Acadia National Park Visitor Study Summer 2009 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 221 June 2010 Marc F. Manni Margaret Littlejohn Steven J. Hollenhorst Marc Manni is a Research Analyst with the Visitor Services Project. Dr. Steven Hollenhorst is the Director of the Park Studies Unit, Department of Conservation Social Sciences, University of Idaho. We thank Margaret Littlejohn, Director of the Visitor Services Project at the University of Idaho, for overseeing the survey fieldwork, the staff and volunteers of Acadia National Park for assisting with the survey, and David Vollmer and Yanyin Xu for data processing. Acadia National Park – VSP Visitor Study August 2-8, 2009 Visitor Services Project Acadia National Park Report Summary ! This report describes the results of a visitor study at Acadia National Park during August 2-8, 2009. A total of 1,160 questionnaires were distributed to visitor groups. Of those, 854 questionnaires were returned, resulting in an overall 73.6% response rate. ! This report profiles a systematic random sample of Acadia National Park visitors. Most results are presented in graphs and frequency tables. Summaries of visitor comments are included in the report and complete comments are included in the Visitor Comments Appendix. ! Thirty-seven percent of visitor groups were in groups of two and 33% were in groups of three or four.
    [Show full text]