DOCSLIB.ORG

Status Assessment of Laysan and Black-Footed Albatrosses, North Pacific Ocean, 1923–2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status Assessment of Laysan and Black-Footed Albatrosses, North Pacific Ocean, 1923–2005 Status Assessment of Laysan and Black-Footed Albatrosses, North Pacific Ocean, 1923–2005 Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5131 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph of Laysan and black-footed albatrosses. Photograph taken by Eric VanderWerf, Pacific Rim Conservation. Status Assessment of Laysan and Black-Footed Albatrosses, North Pacific Ocean, 1923–2005 By Javier A. Arata, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Paul R. Sievert, U.S. Geological Survey, and Maura B. Naughton, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5131 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Arata, J.A., Sievert, P.R., and Naughton, M.B., 2009, Status assessment of Laysan and black-footed albatrosses, North Pacific Ocean, 1923–2005: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5131, 80 p. iii Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................................................................4 Legal and Conservation Status ....................................................................................................................4 Species’ Descriptions ...................................................................................................................................5 Geographic Distribution ................................................................................................................................5 Breeding Colonies.................................................................................................................................5 At-Sea Distribution ..............................................................................................................................5 At Sea: Breeding Albatrosses ...................................................................................................6 At Sea: Non-Breeding Albatrosses ..........................................................................................7 Natural History ...............................................................................................................................................8 Laysan Albatross...................................................................................................................................8 Breeding Cycle .............................................................................................................................8 Nests and Nest Spacing .............................................................................................................8 Breeding Site and Mate Fidelity ................................................................................................8 Demography and Limiting Factors ............................................................................................8 Predators .......................................................................................................................................9 Diet and Foraging Behavior .....................................................................................................10 Black-Footed Albatross .....................................................................................................................10 Breeding Cycle ...........................................................................................................................10 Nests and Nest Spacing ...........................................................................................................10 Breeding Site and Mate Fidelity ..............................................................................................11 Demography and Limiting Factors ..........................................................................................11 Predators .....................................................................................................................................11 Diet and Foraging Behavior .....................................................................................................11 Habitat Requirements..................................................................................................................................12 Threats ...........................................................................................................................................................12 Fishery Bycatch...................................................................................................................................12 Description of the Fisheries .....................................................................................................12 Bycatch Estimation ....................................................................................................................14 Predation ..............................................................................................................................................16 Introduced Species ............................................................................................................................16 Habitat Loss and Degradation ..........................................................................................................16 Invasive Plants ...........................................................................................................................16 Urban and Military Development ............................................................................................16 Conflicts with Military Activities ......................................................................................................17 iv Contents—Continued Threats—Continued Pesticides and Other Contaminants ................................................................................................18 Metals .........................................................................................................................................18 Organochlorine Contaminants .................................................................................................18 Plastics .................................................................................................................................................20 Disease .................................................................................................................................................20 Population Size and Isolation ...........................................................................................................20 Climate Change ...................................................................................................................................21 Monitoring and Management Activities ..................................................................................................21 Monitoring ...........................................................................................................................................21 Breeding Surveys.......................................................................................................................21 Bycatch Monitoring ...................................................................................................................22 Management Activities ......................................................................................................................22 Protection of Nesting Islands ..................................................................................................22 Habitat and Vegetation Management ....................................................................................22 Predator Management ..............................................................................................................23 Fishery Management ................................................................................................................23 Migratory Bird Treaty Act .........................................................................................................23 Population Status and Trends ...................................................................................................................23 Population Analysis Methods ...........................................................................................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plumage Variation and Hybridization in Black-Footed and Laysan Albatrosses
    PlumaDevariation and hybridizationin Black-footedand LaysanAlbatrosses Tristan McKee P.O. Box631 Ferndale,California 95536 (eraall:bertmckee•yahoo.com) PeterPyle 4990Shoreline Highway SUnsonBeach, California 94970 (email:[email protected]) INTRODUCTION Black-footed(Phoebastria nigripes) and Laysan (P. immutabilis) Albatrosses nest sideby sidein denseisland colonies. Their breeding populations center in the northwesternHawaiian Islands, with smaller colonies scattered across the subtrop- icalNorth Pacific. Both species visit nutrient-rich waters off the west coast of North Americathroughout the year to forage. Black-footeds concentrate in coastal waters fromnorthern California tosouthern Alaska, while Laysans frequent more offshore andnortherly waters in thisregion. Bkders on pelagic trips off the West Coast often encountersignificant numbers of oneor bothof thesespecies, and searching for other,rarer albatrosses among them has proven to be a worthwhile pursuit in recen! years(Stallcup and Terrill 1996, Cole 2000). Albatrossesidentified as Black-looted x Laysan hybrids have been seen and studiedon MidwayAtoll and other northwestern Hawaiian Islands since the late 1800s(Rothschild 1900, Fisher 1948, 1972). In addition,considerable variation in appearanceis found within both species, indMduals with strikinglyaberrant plumageand soft part colors occasionally being encountered (Fisher 1972, Whittow 1993a).Midway Atoll hosts approximately two-thirds of the world'sbreeding A presumedhybrid Laysan x Black-lootedAlbatross tends a chickat Midway LaysanAlbatrosses
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior and Attendance Patterns of the Fork-Tailed Storm-Petrel
    BEHAVIOR AND ATTENDANCE PATTERNS OF THE FORK-TAILED STORM-PETREL THEODORE R. SIMONS Wildlife Science Group, Collegeof Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 USA ABSTRACT.--Behavior and attendance patterns of breeding Fork-tailed Storm-Petrels (Ocea- nodromafurcata) were monitored over two nesting seasonson the Barren Islands, Alaska. The asynchrony of egg laying and hatching shown by these birds apparently reflects the influence of severalfactors, including snow conditionson the breedinggrounds, egg neglectduring incubation, and food availability. Communication between breeding birds was characterized by auditory and tactile signals.Two distinct vocalizationswere identified, one of which appearsto be a sex-specific call given by males during pair formation. Generally, both adults were present in the burrow on the night of egg laying, and the male took the first incubation shift. Incubation shiftsranged from 1 to 5 days, with 2- and 3-day shifts being the most common. Growth parameters of the chicks, reproductive success, and breeding chronology varied considerably between years; this pre- sumably relates to a difference in conditions affecting the availability of food. Adults apparently responded to changes in food availability during incubation by altering their attendance patterns. When conditionswere good, incubation shifts were shorter, egg neglectwas reduced, and chicks were brooded longer and were fed more frequently. Adults assistedthe chick in emerging from the shell. Chicks became active late in the nestling stage and began to venture from the burrow severaldays prior to fledging. Adults continuedto visit the chick during that time but may have reducedthe amountof fooddelivered. Chicks exhibiteda distinctprefledging weight loss.Received 18 September1979, accepted26 July 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits and Feeding Grounds of the Northern Elephant Seal Richard
    FEEDING HABITS AND FEEDING GROUNDS OF THE NORTHERN ELEPHANT SEAL RICHARDCONDIT AND BUHNEYJ, LE BOEUF Department of Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 ABSTRAC’r-Prey species consumed by northern elephant seals were identified from the stom- ach and throat contents of dead seals and from observations of prey captured. Their diet is catholic, consisting of a variety of pelagic, deep water squid, Pacific hake, sharks, rays, and ratfish. Feeding grounds of elephant seals were inferred from sightings of tagged elephant seals at non-rookery locations. Feeding areas extended from northern Baja California to northern Vancouver Island. Juveniles of both sexes and adult males moved north from their haul out sites in search of food, travelling furthest north during the summer. A few sightings suggested that adult females remain in the vicinity of the rookeries where they breed. Northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris, breed and molt in large aggregations on land in Baja California and California, but spend the majority of the year feeding at sea. The large breeding aggregations are easy to observe and a great deal is known about the elephant seal’s reproductive behavior (Le Boeuf, 1974; Reiter et al., 1981). In contrast, the animals are rarely observed at sea and little is known about their feeding biology. Existing information on the food habits of the northern elephant seal comes from the exam- ination of stomach contents of only nine specimens (Huey, 1930; Freiberg and Dumas, 1954; Cowan and Guiguet, 1956; Morejohn and Baltz, 1970; Antonelis and Fiscus, 1980; Jones, 1981). The remains of sharks, ratfish, squids, and bony fish were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Tube-Nosed Seabirds) Unique Characteristics
    PELAGIC SEABIRDS OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM & CORDELL BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY Written by Carol A. Keiper August, 2008 Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary protects an area of 529 square miles in one of the most productive offshore regions in North America. The sanctuary is located approximately 43 nautical miles northwest of the Golden Gate Bridge, and San Francisco California. The prominent feature of the Sanctuary is a submerged granite bank 4.5 miles wide and 9.5 miles long, which lay submerged 115 feet below the ocean’s surface. This unique undersea topography, in combination with the nutrient-rich ocean conditions created by the physical process of upwelling, produces a lush feeding ground. for countless invertebrates, fishes (over 180 species), marine mammals (over 25 species), and seabirds (over 60 species). The undersea oasis of the Cordell Bank and surrounding waters teems with life and provides food for hundreds of thousands of seabirds that travel from the Farallon Islands and the Point Reyes peninsula or have migrated thousands of miles from Alaska, Hawaii, Australia, New Zealand, and South America. Cordell Bank is also known as the albatross capital of the Northern Hemisphere because numerous species visit these waters. The US National Marine Sanctuaries are administered and managed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) who work with the public and other partners to balance human use and enjoyment with long-term conservation. There are four major orders of seabirds: 1) Sphenisciformes – penguins 2) *Procellariformes – albatross, fulmars, shearwaters, petrels 3) Pelecaniformes – pelicans, boobies, cormorants, frigate birds 4) *Charadriiformes - Gulls, Terns, & Alcids *Orders presented in this seminar In general, seabirds have life histories characterized by low productivity, delayed maturity, and relatively high adult survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Science Plan
    NATURAL RESOURCES SCIENCE PLAN 2011-2015 PAPAHÄNAUMOKUÄKEA MARINE NATIONAL MONUMENT NATURAL RESOURCES SCIENCE PLAN April 2011 Prepared by: Papahänaumokuäkea Marine National Monument National Oceanic and United States Fish and Hawai‘i Department of Land and Atmospheric Administration Wildlife Service Natural Resources 6600 Kalanianaole Highway, Suite 300 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Room 5-231 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 130 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96825 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96850 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813 NATURAL RESOURCES SCIENCE PLAN 2011-2015 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Overview of the Monument.....................................................................................3 1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Plan.................................................................................4 1.3 Stakeholders ............................................................................................................5 2.0 SUMMARY OF PLANNING PROCESS .................................................................... 6 2.1 Development of a Research and Monitoring Framework for the Monument .............6 2.2 Public Review and Comment...................................................................................7 2.3 Profiling Ongoing and Potential New Research and Monitoring Projects .................9 2.4 Identification of Research and Monitoring Gaps and Needs...................................10 2.5 Prioritization of Research and Monitoring Activities...............................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Fish Management Plan
    Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan November 19, 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program 2040 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365 (541) 867-4741 http://www.dfw.state.or.us/MRP/ Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Federal action to protect Forage Fish (2016)............................................................................................ 7 The Oregon Marine Fisheries Management Plan Framework .................................................................. 7 Relationship to Other State Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 Public Process Developing this Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 How this Document is Organized .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Resource Analysis ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin/U S Dept of Commerce National Oceanic
    Abstract.- Gastrointestinal tract contents were evaluated from Prey selection by northern fur seals 73 female andjuvenile male north­ ern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) fCallorhinus ursinusJ in the eastern for analysis of their diet in the Bering Sea. Fur seals were col­ Bering Sea lected from August to October of 1981, 1982, and 1985. Juvenile Elizabeth Sinclair walleye pollock (Theragra chalco­ gramma) and gonatid squid were Thomas Loughlin the primary prey. Pacific herring National Marine Mammal Laboratory. Alaska Fisheries Science Center; (Clupea pallasi) and capelin National Marine Fisheries Service. NOM <Mallotus villosus), considered im­ 7600 Sand Point Way. N.E., Seattle, Washington 98115 portant fur seal prey in previous reports, were absent from the diet. Prey species and size varied William Pearcy among years and between near­ College of Oceanography, Oregon State University shore and pelagic sample loca­ Oceanography Administration Building 104 tions. Interannual variation in the Corvaflis, Oregon 9733 J importance ofpollock in the diet of fur seals was positively related to year-class strength of pollock. Midwater (n=23) and bottom (n=116) trawls were conducted at The Pribilof Island population (St. were conducted prior to the 1975­ the location of fur seal collections George and St. Paul Islands) of 81 population decline and prior to to determine availability of fish northern fur seals (Callorhinus the 1970's development of a com­ and squid relative to prey species eaten by fur seals. The species and ursinus) represents approximately mercial walleye pollock (Theragra size composition of prey taken by 75% of the total species breeding chalcogramma) fishery in the fur seals was similar to midwater population.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • LAYSAN ALBATROSS Phoebastria Immutabilis
    Alaska Seabird Information Series LAYSAN ALBATROSS Phoebastria immutabilis Conservation Status ALASKA: High N. AMERICAN: High Concern GLOBAL: Vulnerable Breed Eggs Incubation Fledge Nest Feeding Behavior Diet Nov-July 1 ~ 65 d 165 d ground scrape surface dip fish, squid, fish eggs and waste Life History and Distribution Laysan Albatrosses (Phoebastria immutabilis) breed primarily in the Hawaiian Islands, but they inhabit Alaskan waters during the summer months to feed. They are the 6 most abundant of the three albatross species that visit 200 en Alaska. l The albatross has been described as the “true nomad ff Pok e of the oceans.” Once fledged, it remains at sea for three to J ht ig five years before returning to the island where it was born. r When birds are eight or nine years old they begin to breed. y The breeding season is November to July and the rest of Cop the year, the birds remain at sea. Strong, effortless flight is commonly seen in the southern Bering Sea, Aleutian the key to being able to spend so much time in the air. The Islands, and the northwestern Gulf of Alaska. albatross takes advantage of air currents just above the Nonbreeders may remain in Alaska throughout the year ocean's waves to soar in perpetual fluid motion. It may not and breeding birds are known to travel from Hawaii to flap its wings for hours, or even for days. The aerial Alaska in search of food for their young. Albatrosses master never touches land outside the breeding season, but have the ability to concentrate the food they catch and it does rest on the water to feed and sleep.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 177: 115-131, 1999 Published February 11 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill J. P. Croxall*, K. Reid, P. A. Prince British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council. High Cross, Madingley Road. Cambridge CB3 OET. United Kingdom ABSTRACT: Knowledge of relationships between prey availability and predator performance is the key to using predators as indicators of the state of marine systems and to assessing potential conse- quences of competition between natural predators and man for common resources. Fluctuations in the abundance of Antarctic knll are beiieved to have a substantial influence on the reproductive perfor- mance of krill-dependent top predator species in the Southern Ocean; few quantifications of such inter- actions exist. At South Georgia, for 2 years in which acoustic surveys revealed a major difference in knll abundance, we compared diet, prov~sioningof offspring and breeding success in 4 main predator species (2 penguins, 2 albatrosses, with supporting data from Antarctic fur seal) whose dependence on krd typically ranges from 20 to 90%. The 4-fold difference in krill biomass between 1986 (ca 30 g m-2) and 1994 (ca 7 g m-2)was accompanied by (1) an 88 to 90% reduction in the mass of krill in predator dlets (and some increase in the fish component), (2) greater prey diversity for most species, (3) reduced diet overlap between species and (4) a switch from krill to amphipods in macaroni penguin but no major dietary change in other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Social Stimuli in Attracting Laysan Albatross to New Potential Nesting Sites
    EFFECTIVENESS OF SOCIAL STIMULI IN ATTRACTING LAYSAN ALBATROSS TO NEW POTENTIAL NESTING SITES RICHARD H. PODOLSKY • Universityof Michigan,School of Natural Resources,Ann Arbor,Michigan 48109 USA Al•sTRACT.--Seabirdcolonies usually grow as first-time breeders join existing groups. I testedthe hypothesisthat the presenceof conspecifics,specifically the sight and sound of establishedbreeders, was the stimulus responsiblefor first-time breeders to join existing colonies.The attractivepower of conspecificswas testedby presentingto conspecificsmodels of LaysanAlbatross (Diomedea immutabilis) in severalbehavior postures, with accompanying recordings of vocalizations. I found that Laysan Albatross landed more frequently in areas where both albatrossmodels and vocalizationswere present than in areaswith only visual stimuli or no vocal stimuli. Landing albatrossand those on the ground were found nearer to the artificial social stimuli than would be expectedfrom a random distribution. Three- dimensionalmodels were more attractivethan two-dimensionalmodels, and paired models were more attractive than single models for both three-dimensionaland two-dimensional models.Three-dimensional models in a sky-pointingposture were the mostattractive overall, whereas models in head-forward posture were the most attractive two-dimensional models. Albatrossexhibited courtshipbehavior closerto the modelsthan would be expectedfrom a random distribution. The implicationsof attraction to endangeredbird managementand restorationare discussed.Received 3 April 1989,accepted
    [Show full text]
  • MILLERBIRD Acrocephalus Familiaris Native Resident, Endemic, Endangered A.F
    MILLERBIRD Acrocephalus familiaris native resident, endemic, endangered A.f. familiaris (Laysan) Laysan subspecies extinct A.f. kingi (Nihoa) The Millerbird is an endemic resident in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (AOU 1998), having likely colonized the archipelago from Asia or other Pacific Island groups (Bryan 1940; Berger 1972, 1981; E 31:47). Acrocephalus warblers have widely colonized the Pacific Basin (Pratt et al. 1987, Wiles 2005, Cibois et al. 2011), and Millerbird has been found to be genetically distant from other Pacific congeners (AOU 1983, Fleischer et al. 2007), being the first to diverge from other taxa within a Polynesian clade (Cibois et al. 2011). Cassin (1858) followed by Dole (1869, 1879) reported an Acrocephalus warbler (as "Tatare otaiensis") in the marshes of Kaua'i and Hawai'i, which caused Rothschild (1900) and Bryan (1901a) to consider it a possibility on these islands, but Cassin was apparently referring to Acrocephalus caffer which is not found in Hawaii (see Tahiti Reed Warbler). No subfossil evidence exists for the occurrence of Acrocephalus in the Southeastern Hawaiian Islands (Olson and Ziegler 1995), which is curious given the genus' widespread distribution within the Pacific Basin (Bryan 1940). Two subspecies of Millerbird have been found, on Laysan and Nihoa, which are distinct and could be treated as different species (Wetmore 1924, Munro 1944, Olson and Ziegler 1995, Olson 1996b, Fleischer et al. 2007) but most regard them as subspecies (see Synonymies). See Banko (1979) for locations of 104 specimens of Millerbird, and Morin et al. (1997) for a summary of the natural history and biology of the species.
    [Show full text]