Countries Eligible for Gsp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

COUNTRIES ELIGIBLE FOR GSP GSP-Eligible Beneficiaries (as of March 2018) Independent countries The following independent countries are GSP-eligible beneficiary developing countries: Afghanistan Congo (Brazzaville) Jamaica Nepal Tanzania Albania Congo (Kinshasa) Jordan Niger Thailand Algeria Côte d'Ivoire Kazakhstan Nigeria Timor-Leste Angola Djibouti Kenya Pakistan Togo Papua New Argentina Dominica Kiribati Tonga Guinea Armenia Ecuador Kosovo Paraguay Tunisia Azerbaijan Egypt Kyrgyzstan Philippines Turkey Belize Eritrea Lebanon Rwanda Tuvalu Benin Ethiopia Lesotho Saint Lucia Uganda St. Vincent and Bhutan Fiji Liberia Ukraine the Grenadines Bolivia Gabon Macedonia Samoa Uzbekistan Bosnia and Sao Tomé and Gambia, The Madagascar Vanuatu Herzegovina Principe Yemen Botswana Georgia Malawi Senegal (Republic of) Brazil Ghana Maldives Serbia Zambia Burkina Faso Grenada Mali Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Burma Guinea Mauritania Solomon Islands Burundi Guinea-Bissau Mauritius Somalia Cambodia Guyana Moldova South Africa Cameroon Haiti Mongolia South Sudan Cape Verde India Montenegro Sri Lanka Central African Indonesia Mozambique Suriname Republic Chad Iraq Namibia Swaziland Comoros 1 Non-independent countries and territories The following non-independent countries and territories are GSP-eligible beneficiaries: Anguilla Falkland Islands Pitcairn Islands West Bank and Gaza (Islas Malvinas) Strip British Indian Ocean Heard Island and Saint Helena Western Sahara Territory McDonald Islands Christmas Island Montserrat Tokelau Cocos (Keeling) Niue Virgin Islands, Islands British Cook Islands Norfolk Island Wallis and Futuna Please see General Note 4 of the HTS http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/bychapter/index.htm for the most current lists of countries, territories and associations. Least-developed beneficiary developing countries Afghanistan Congo Malawi Solomon Islands (Kinshasa) Angola Djibouti Mali Somalia Benin Ethiopia Mauritania South Sudan Bhutan Gambia, The Mozambique Tanzania Burkina Faso Guinea Nepal Timor-Leste Burma Guinea-Bissau Niger Togo Burundi Haiti Rwanda Tuvalu Cambodia Kiribati Samoa Uganda Sao Tomé and Central African Republic Lesotho Vanuatu Principe Chad Liberia Senegal Yemen (Republic of) Comoros Madagascar Sierra Leone Zambia 2 Associations of countries (treated as one country for GSP rule-of-origin requirements) Qualifying Member Countries of the Member Countries of the Cartagena Southern Africa Development Agreement (Andean Group): Community (SADC): Bolivia Botswana Ecuador Mauritius Tanzania Qualifying Member Countries of the Member Countries of the West South Asian Association for Regional African Economic and Monetary Cooperation (SAARC): Union (WAEMU): Benin Afghanistan Burkina Faso Bhutan Côte d'Ivoire India Guinea-Bissau Nepal Mali Pakistan Niger Sri Lanka Senegal Togo Qualifying Member Countries of the Qualifying Member Countries of the Association of South East Asian Nations Caribbean Common Market (CARICOM): (ASEAN): Burma Belize Cambodia Dominica Indonesia Grenada Philippines Guyana Thailand Jamaica Montserrat Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Place of Alcohol in the Lives of People from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue
The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview A report prepared by Sector Analysis, Ministry of Health for the Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand ALAC Research Monograph Series: No 2 Wellington 1997 ISSN 1174-1856 ISBN 0-477-06317-9 Acknowledgments This particular chapter which is an overview of the reports from each of the six Pacific communities would not have been possible without all the field teams and participants who took part in the project. I would like to thank Ezra Jennings-Pedro, Terrisa Taupe, Tufaina Taupe Sofaia Kamakorewa, Maikali (Mike) Kilioni, Fane Malani, Tina McNicholas, Mere Samusamuvodre, Litimai Rasiga, Tevita Rasiga, Apisa Tuiqere, Ruve Tuivoavoa, Doreen Arapai, Dahlia Naepi, Slaven Naepi, Vili Nosa, Yvette Guttenbeil, Sione Liava’a, Wailangilala Tufui , Susana Tu’inukuafe, Anne Allan-Moetaua, Helen Kapi, Terongo Tekii, Tunumafono Ken Ah Kuoi, Tali Beaton, Myra McFarland, Carmel Peteru, Damas Potoi and their communities who supported them. Many people who have not been named offered comment and shared stories with us through informal discussion. Our families and friends were drawn in and though they did not formally participate they too gave their opinions and helped to shape the information gathered. Special thanks to all the participants and Jean Mitaera, Granby Siakimotu, Kili Jefferson, Dr Ian Prior, Henry Tuia, Lita Foliaki and Tupuola Malifa who reviewed the reports and asked pertinent questions.
[Show full text]
Tokelau the Last Colony?
Tokelau The last colony? TONY ANGELO (Taupulega) is, and long has been, the governing body. The chairman (Faipule) of the council and a village head ITUATED WELL NORTH OF NEW ZEALAND and (Pulenuku) are elected by universal suffrage in the village SWestern Samoa and close to the equator, the small every three years. The three councils send representatives atolls of Tokelau, with their combined population of about to form the General Fono which is the Tokelau national 1600 people, may well be the last colony of New Zealand. authority; it originally met only once or twice a year and Whether, when and in what way that colonial status of advised the New Zealand Government of Tokelau's Tokelau will end, is a mat- wishes. ter of considerable specula- The General Fono fre- lion. quently repeated advice, r - Kirlb•ll ·::- (Gifb•rr I•) The recently passed lbn•b'a ' ......... both to the New Zealand (Oc: ..n I} Tokelau Amendment Act . :_.. PMtnb 11 Government and to the UN 1996- it received the royal Committee on Decoloni • •• roltfl•u assent on 10 June 1996, and 0/tlh.g• sation, that Tokelau did not 1- •, Aotum•- Uu.t (Sw•ln•J · came into force on 1 August 1 f .. • Tllloplol ~~~~~ !•J.. ·-~~~oa wish to change its status ~ ~ 1996 - is but one piece in ' \, vis-a-vis New Zealand. the colourful mosaic of •l . However, in an unexpected Tokelau's constitutional de change of position (stimu- velopment. lated no doubt by external The colonialism that factors such as the UN pro Tokelau has known has posal to complete its been the British version, and decolonisation business by it has lasted so far for little the year 2000), the Ulu of over a century.
[Show full text]
ISO Country Codes
COUNTRY SHORT NAME DESCRIPTION CODE AD Andorra Principality of Andorra AE United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates AF Afghanistan The Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan AG Antigua and Barbuda Antigua and Barbuda (includes Redonda Island) AI Anguilla Anguilla AL Albania Republic of Albania AM Armenia Republic of Armenia Netherlands Antilles (includes Bonaire, Curacao, AN Netherlands Antilles Saba, St. Eustatius, and Southern St. Martin) AO Angola Republic of Angola (includes Cabinda) AQ Antarctica Territory south of 60 degrees south latitude AR Argentina Argentine Republic America Samoa (principal island Tutuila and AS American Samoa includes Swain's Island) AT Austria Republic of Austria Australia (includes Lord Howe Island, Macquarie Islands, Ashmore Islands and Cartier Island, and Coral Sea Islands are Australian external AU Australia territories) AW Aruba Aruba AX Aland Islands Aland Islands AZ Azerbaijan Republic of Azerbaijan BA Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina BB Barbados Barbados BD Bangladesh People's Republic of Bangladesh BE Belgium Kingdom of Belgium BF Burkina Faso Burkina Faso BG Bulgaria Republic of Bulgaria BH Bahrain Kingdom of Bahrain BI Burundi Republic of Burundi BJ Benin Republic of Benin BL Saint Barthelemy Saint Barthelemy BM Bermuda Bermuda BN Brunei Darussalam Brunei Darussalam BO Bolivia Republic of Bolivia Federative Republic of Brazil (includes Fernando de Noronha Island, Martim Vaz Islands, and BR Brazil Trindade Island) BS Bahamas Commonwealth of the Bahamas BT Bhutan Kingdom of Bhutan
[Show full text]
A Solution for the Third International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism: a ‘Fourth’ Option to Obviate the Need for a Fourth Decade?
A SOLUTION FOR THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL DECADE FOR THE ERADICATION OF COLONIALISM: A ‘FOURTH’ OPTION TO OBVIATE THE NEED FOR A FOURTH DECADE? Elisabeth Perham* I. Introduction Despite concerted efforts by the international community over almost six decades to bring an end to the era of colonialism, 17 territories remain on the United Nations (UN) list of non-self-governing territories.1 In 2011 the UN declared 2011-2020 the Third International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism,2 but few of the non-self-governing territories appear to be getting much closer to completing the decolonisation process.3 For some of the territories this is in large part due to territorial disputes.4 However, for other territories the stalemate may be due to the fact that the UN currently accepts only the three methods of decolonisation prescribed in UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 15415 as proof that a territory has become self- governing for the purposes of removing it from the list. This article argues that for the decolonisation process to be completed there needs to be more flexibility in determining when a territory has become self-governing: the Secretary-General himself has recognised the need for a “creative approach” in the quest for decolonisation.6 More * Elisabeth Perham, LLB (Hons), BA (Hons). A version of this article was submitted as part of the requirements for the LLB (Hons) degree at Victoria University of Wellington. Elisabeth is grateful to Professor Tony Angelo for his supervision of that paper. 1 Hereinafter referred to as the list. Anguilla, American Samoa, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, French Polynesia, Gibraltar, Guam, Montserrat, New Caledonia, Pitcairn, St Helena, Tokelau, Turks and Caicos Islands, United States Virgin Islands, Western Sahara.
[Show full text]
Threats to the Critically Endangered Christmas
Tirtaningtyas & Hennicke: Threats to the criticallyContributed endangered Papers Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi 137 THREATS TO THE CRITICALLY ENDANGERED CHRISTMAS ISLAND FRIGATEBIRD FREGATA ANDREWSI IN JAKARTA BAY, INDONESIA, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RECONSIDERING CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FRANSISCA N. TIRTANINGTYAS1 & JANOS C. HENNICKE2,3 1Burung Laut Indonesia, Depok, East Java, 16421, Indonesia ([email protected]) 2Dept. of Ecology and Conservation, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 3CEBC-CNRS, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France Received 4 November 2014, accepted 26 February 2015 SUMMARY Tirtaningtyas, F.N. & HENNICKE, J.C. 2015. Threats to the critically endangered Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia, and implications for reconsidering conservation priorities. Marine Ornithology 43: 137–140. The Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi is one of the most endangered seabirds in the world. The reasons for its population decline are unknown, but recommended protection measures and management actions focus on the species’ breeding site. Threats to the species away from Christmas Island have received little consideration. Here, we report on several previously undescribed anthropogenic threats to Christmas Island Frigatebirds based on observations in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia: accidental entanglement in fishing gear, as well as capture, poisoning and shooting. Based on these findings, we suggest that it is imperative to reconsider the present management strategies and conservation priorities for the species and to urgently include protection measures away from Christmas Island. Keywords: Christmas Island Frigatebird, Fregata andrewsi, conservation, mortality, anthropogenic threats, Jakarta Bay, Southeast Asia INTRODUCTION Christmas Island Frigatebirds are exposed to threats in Southeast Asian waters, namely in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia, that might contribute The Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi is one of the to the unexplained population decline of the species.
[Show full text]
Endemic Species of Christmas Island, Indian Ocean D.J
RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 055–114 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.055-114 Endemic species of Christmas Island, Indian Ocean D.J. James1, P.T. Green2, W.F. Humphreys3,4 and J.C.Z. Woinarski5 1 73 Pozieres Ave, Milperra, New South Wales 2214, Australia. 2 Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia. 3 Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. 4 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. 5 NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory 0909, Australia, Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – Many oceanic islands have high levels of endemism, but also high rates of extinction, such that island species constitute a markedly disproportionate share of the world’s extinctions. One important foundation for the conservation of biodiversity on islands is an inventory of endemic species. In the absence of a comprehensive inventory, conservation effort often defaults to a focus on the better-known and more conspicuous species (typically mammals and birds). Although this component of island biota often needs such conservation attention, such focus may mean that less conspicuous endemic species (especially invertebrates) are neglected and suffer high rates of loss. In this paper, we review the available literature and online resources to compile a list of endemic species that is as comprehensive as possible for the 137 km2 oceanic Christmas Island, an Australian territory in the north-eastern Indian Ocean.
[Show full text]
Introduction 3
1 ,QWURGXFWLRQ The inquiry process 1.1 On 8 November 2000 the Senate referred matters relating to the tender process for the sale of the Christmas Island Casino and Resort to the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories, for inquiry and report by 5 April 2001. The reporting date was subsequently extended to 27 September 2001. The full terms of reference are set out at the beginning of this report. 1.2 The inquiry was advertised in the Territories’ Tattler on 1 December 2000 and nationally in The Australian on 6 December 2000. The Committee also wrote to relevant Commonwealth Departments and to a number of organisations, inviting submissions. 1.3 The Committee received fifteen submissions, which are listed at Appendix A, and eleven exhibits, listed at Appendix B. Submissions are available from the Committee’s web site at: www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/ncet 1.4 The Committee held public hearings in Canberra in February and June 2001, and in Perth and Christmas Island in April 2001. Details are listed at Appendix C. Structure of the report 1.5 This report is divided into six chapters. Chapter One provides a background to the inquiry and details on the social, political and economic framework of the Island; 2 RISKY BUSINESS Chapter Two details the history and operation of the Christmas Island Casino and Resort, from its opening in 1993 to its closure in 1998; Chapter Three details the tender and sale process of the casino and resort; Chapter Four examines the conduct of the tender process; Chapter Five examines the outcome of the sale of the casino and resort; and Chapter Six details a number of broader community concerns which formed the context of the inquiry.
[Show full text]
Unlocking the Secrets of Swains Island: a Maritime Heritage Resources Survey
“Unlocking the Secrets of Swains Island:” a Maritime Heritage Resources Survey September 2013 Hans K. Van Tilburg, David J. Herdrich, Rhonda Suka, Matthew Lawrence, Christopher Filimoehala, Stephanie Gandulla National Marine Sanctuaries National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Maritime Heritage Program Series: Number 6 The Maritime Heritage Program works cooperatively and in collaboration within the Sanctuary System and with partners outside of NOAA. We work to better understand, assess and protect America’s maritime heritage and to share what we learn with the public as well as other scholars and resource managers. This is the first volume in a series of technical reports that document the work of the Maritime Heritage Program within and outside of the National Marine Sanctuaries. These reports will examine the maritime cultural landscape of America in all of its aspects, from overviews, historical studies, excavation and survey reports to genealogical studies. No. 1: The Search for Planter: The Ship That Escaped Charleston and Carried Robert Smalls to Destiny. No. 2: Archaeological Excavation of the Forepeak of the Civil War Blockade Runner Mary Celestia, Southampton, Bermuda No. 3: Maritime Cultural Landscape Overview: The Redwood Coast No. 4: Maritime Cultural Landscape Overview: The Outer Banks No. 5: Survey and Assessment of the U.S. Coast Survey Steamship Robert J. Walker, Atlantic City, New Jersey. These reports will be available online as downloadable PDFs and in some cases will also be printed and bound. Additional titles will become available as work on the series progresses. Cover Image - Figure 1: Swains Island satellite image: Image Science & Analysis Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Center.
[Show full text]
Automatic Exchange of Information (AEI) List of Counterparty Jurisdictions for Your Accounts Booked in British Virgin Islands
ab Automatic Exchange of Information (AEI) List of Counterparty Jurisdictions for your accounts booked in British Virgin Islands Disclaimer UBS AG and its affiliated entities (UBS) does not provide legal or tax advice and this summary does not constitute such advice. UBS strongly recommends all persons considering the information described in this summary obtain appropriate independent legal, tax and other professional advice. This summary is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any product or other specific services. Although all pieces of information and views expressed in this summary were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, neither representation nor warranty, express or implied is made as to its accuracy or completeness. The general explanations included in this summary cannot address your personal situation and financial needs. All information is subject to change without notice. This summary may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. The status of a jurisdiction can change at any time. Whilst UBS will use all reasonable endeavors to update this list, there may be changes which become effective before a revised list is published. Information to be reported will depend on the status of the client's jurisdiction(s) of tax residence at the cut-off date for reporting and such status may differ from the status displayed on this list. Information contained in the below table does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever concerning the legal status of any territory or of its authorities.
[Show full text]
COUNTRIES - Residents, Citizens and Companies of the Following Countries Are Not Currently Allowed to Open Accounts with Glenmuir
Guide for Introducers Unlisted Jurisdictions COUNTRIES - Residents, citizens and companies of the following countries are not currently allowed to open accounts with Glenmuir Afghanistan Equatorial Guinea Mozambique Tristan da Cunha American Samoa Fiji Myanmar Turks and Caicos Angola French Polynesia Namibia Turkmenistan Anguilla French Southern Territories Nauru Tuvalu Antarctica Gabon New Caledonia Uganda Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Gambia Niger United States of America Bangladesh Gaza Strip. Nigeria U.S. Minor Outlying Islands Belize Ghana Niue U.S. Virgin islands Benin Grenada Norfolk Island Holy See (Vatican City State) Bolivia Guinea Northern Mariana Islands Vanuatu Bolivarian Republic of Bouvet Guinea (CONAKRY) Panama Venezuela Island Guam Pakistan Vietnam Botswana Heard Island and McDonald Palestinian Territory Wallis and Futuna British Virgin Islands Islands Pitcairn Western Sahara British Indian Ocean Territory Honduras Puerto Rico Yemen Brunei Haiti Rwanda Zambia Burkina Faso Iraq Saint Helena, Ascension and Zimbabwe Burma Iran, Islamic Republic of Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa Burundi Virgin Islands, U.S. Kiribati Sandwich Islands Cambodia Kosovo Sao Tome and Principe Central African Republic Cocos Korea, Democratic People’s Rep. Seychelles (Keeling) Islands Congo, the Kyrgyzstan Sierra Leone Democratic Rep. Congo Lao People’s Democratic Rep. Somalia Comoros Lebanon South Sudan Commonwealth of Dominica Cook Liberia South Georgia and the South Islands Lesotho Sri Lanka Costa Rica Libya St. Barthelemy Cote d’Ivoire Macao St. Kitts and Nevis Chad Madagascar St. Vincent and the Grenadines Cuba Malawi Sudan Cape Verde Maldives Svalbard and Jan Mayen Cayman Islands Mali Swaziland Christmas Island Marshall Islands Syrian Arab Republic Djibouti Mauritania Tajikistan Eritrea Mauritius Timor-Leste Ethiopia Mayotte Togo Micronesia Tonga Montserrat Tokelau www.glenmuircapitaltrust.com .
[Show full text]
Review of Tourism – the Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Christmas Island Indian Ocean Territories Regional Development Organisation – Tourism Review July 2020 Contents
Review of Tourism – The Cocos (Keeling) Islands and Christmas Island Indian Ocean Territories Regional Development Organisation – Tourism Review July 2020 Contents Executive Summary 3 Background 5 Critical Assessment 7 Review Findings 25 Deloitte Indian Ocean Territories Tourism Review 2 Executive Summary Tourism Review of the Indian Ocean Territories Context The Indian Ocean Territories (IOTs) are Australia’s most isolated population. In close proximity The Review Phase of this project included an analysis of tourism literature and current and to South-East Asia and with remarkably diverse landscapes, tourism in the IOTs has the forecast global trends to capture best practice methods to incorporate in the IOTs. This included potential to significantly grow the regional economy, providing sustainable business and reviewing Australian and international jurisdictions to understand how destinations have invested employment opportunities. in tourism to drive economies. Tourism on the Cocos (Keeling) Islands has traditionally been driven by kite surfing during the Deloitte completed a comprehensive consultation process that included seven workshops across trade wind season when accommodation is frequently at capacity. With abundant natural the IOTs, one-on-one meetings with stakeholders on the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, one-on-one beauty on land and underwater, a unique cultural identity and scheduled airport runway meetings with stakeholders on Christmas Island, one-on-one meetings with stakeholders in Perth, upgrade, the Cocos (Keeling) Islands are well placed to create a thriving tourism industry. phone interviews and follow-up submissions. The purpose of the Consultation Phase was to understand strengths, weaknesses, barriers to growth and opportunities that can drive tourism in The Christmas Island economy has been dependent on phosphate mining and Government the IOTs and to ensure the future direction of tourism in the IOTs is driven by tourism employed at the Detention Centre.
[Show full text]
Thesis Final
The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2019 Christmas Island: A question of self-determination Kelvin Matthews Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter 2: Historical Background From the beginning of the European settlement of Australia the various Australian colonies began as part of the British colonial empire. While Australia attained Federation as a Commonwealth in 1901, Christmas Island remained as a British administered colony since settlement in the late nineteenth century until 1958 when ‘sovereignty’ of the Territory of Christmas Island was transferred to Australia without any consultative process with the community by either the British or Australian governments at the time. The history of Christmas Island therefore tells three key stories: the first is the economic and social dominance of phosphate mining since the late nineteenth century, which continues to the present day; the second is the relative recent arrival of ‘Australia’ or ‘mainland conditions’ to the Island despite the formal annexure in 1958; and the third is the unique community that has been created, as evidenced by the remarkable cultural and social composition of the community and unusual administrative and institutional arrangements.
[Show full text]