DOCSLIB.ORG

Country Codes for International ACH and IAT Payments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Country Codes for International ACH and IAT Payments Country Codes for International ACH and IAT Payments (Used for PAM SPR Field #34 ‐ CountryCodeText and SPS 440 File Format Field #11 ‐ Country Code Text ) Code Country or Area Name Code Country or Area Name AF Afghanistan IO British Indian Ocean Territory AX Aland Islands BN Brunei Darussalam AL Albania BG Bulgaria DZ Algeria BF Burkina Faso AS American Samoa* BI Burundi AD Andorra KH Cambodia AO Angola CM Cameroon AI Anguilla CA Canada AQ Antarctica CV Cape Verde AG Antigua and Barbuda KY Cayman Islands AR Argentina CF Central African Republic AM Armenia TD Chad AW Aruba CL Chile AU Australia CN China AT Austria HK Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China AZ Azerbaijan MO Macao, Special Administrative Region of China BS Bahamas CX Christmas Island BH Bahrain CC Cocos (Keeling) Islands BD Bangladesh CO Colombia BB Barbados KM Comoros BY Belarus CG Congo (Brazzaville) BE Belgium CD Congo, Democratic Republic of the BZ Belize CK Cook Islands BJ Benin CR Costa Rica BM Bermuda CI Côte d'Ivoire BT Bhutan HR Croatia BO Bolivia CU Cuba BQ Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba CW Curacao / Curacao BA Bosnia and Herzegovina CY Cyprus BW Botswana CZ Czech Republic BV Bouvet Island DK Denmark BR Brazil DJ Djibouti VG British Virgin Islands DM Dominica 1 of 4 *U.S territories, APO and FPO are not considered IAT countries and are not subject to IAT formatting. Country Codes for International ACH and IAT Payments (Used for PAM SPR Field #34 ‐ CountryCodeText and SPS 440 File Format Field #11 ‐ Country Code Text ) Code Country or Area Name Code Country or Area Name DO Dominican Republic HM Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands EC Ecuador VA Holy See (Vatican City State) EG Egypt HN Honduras SV El Salvador HU Hungary GQ Equatorial Guinea IS Iceland ER Eritrea IN India EE Estonia ID Indonesia ET Ethiopia IR Iran, Islamic Republic of FK Falkland Islands (Malvinas) IQ Iraq FO Faroe Islands IE Ireland FJ Fiji IM Isle of Man FI Finland IL Israel FR France IT Italy GF French Guiana JM Jamaica PF French Polynesia JP Japan TF French Southern Territories JE Jersey GA Gabon JO Jordan GM Gambia KZ Kazakhstan GE Georgia KE Kenya DE Germany KI Kiribati GH Ghana KP Korea, Democratic People's Republic of GI Gibraltar KR Korea, Republic of GR Greece KW Kuwait GL Greenland KG Kyrgyzstan GD Grenada LA Lao PDR GP Guadeloupe LV Latvia GU Guam* LB Lebanon GT Guatemala LS Lesotho GG Guernsey LR Liberia GN Guinea LY Libya GW Guinea‐Bissau LI Liechtenstein GY Guyana LT Lithuania HT Haiti LU Luxembourg 2 of 4 * U.S territories, APO and FPO are not considered IAT countries and are not subject to IAT formatting. Country Codes for International ACH and IAT Payments (Used for PAM SPR Field #34 ‐ CountryCodeText and SPS 440 File Format Field #11 ‐ Country Code Text ) Code Country or Area Name Code Country or Area Name MK Macedonia, Republic of MP Northern Mariana Islands* MG Madagascar NO Norway MW Malawi OM Oman MY Malaysia PK Pakistan MV Maldives PW Palau* ML Mali PS Palestinian Territory, Occupied MT Malta PA Panama MH Marshall Islands PG Papua New Guinea MQ Martinique PY Paraguay MR Mauritania PE Peru MU Mauritius PH Philippines YT Mayotte PN Pitcairn MX Mexico PL Poland FM Micronesia, Federated States of PT Portugal MD Moldova PR Puerto Rico* MC Monaco QA Qatar MN Mongolia RE Réunion ME Montenegro RO Romania MS Montserrat RU Russian Federation MA Morocco RW Rwanda MZ Mozambique BL Saint‐Barthélemy MM Myanmar SH Saint Helena NA Namibia KN Saint Kitts and Nevis NR Nauru LC Saint Lucia NP Nepal MF Saint‐Martin (French part) NL Netherlands PM Saint Pierre and Miquelon NC New Caledonia VC Saint Vincent and Grenadines NZ New Zealand WS Samoa NI Nicaragua SM San Marino NE Niger ST Sao Tome and Principe NG Nigeria SA Saudi Arabia NU Niue SN Senegal NF Norfolk Island RS Serbia 3 of 4 * U.S territories, APO and FPO are not considered IAT countries and are not subject to IAT formatting. Country Codes for International ACH and IAT Payments (Used for PAM SPR Field #34 ‐ CountryCodeText and SPS 440 File Format Field #11 ‐ Country Code Text ) Code Country or Area Name Code Country or Area Name SC Seychelles TC Turks and Caicos Islands SL Sierra Leone TV Tuvalu SG Singapore UG Uganda SX Sint Maarten (Dutch part) UA Ukraine SK Slovakia AE United Arab Emirates SI Slovenia GB United Kingdom SB Solomon Islands US United States of America SO Somalia UM United States Minor Outlying Islands ZA South Africa UY Uruguay GS South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands UZ Uzbekistan SS South Sudan VU Vanuatu ES Spain VE Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) LK Sri Lanka VN Viet Nam SD Sudan VI Virgin Islands, US* SR Suriname WF Wallis and Futuna Islands SJ Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands EH Western Sahara SZ Swaziland YE Yemen SE Sweden ZM Zambia CH Switzerland ZW Zimbabwe SY Syrian Arab Republic (Syria) TW Taiwan, Republic of China TJ Tajikistan TZ Tanzania, United Republic of TH Thailand TL Timor‐Leste TG Togo TK Tokelau TO Tonga TT Trinidad and Tobago TN Tunisia TR Turkey TM Turkmenistan 4 of 4 * U.S territories, APO and FPO are not considered IAT countries and are not subject to IAT formatting. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St. Eustatius (Statia)
    St. Eustatius (Statia) Overview: Sint Eustatius, also known as Statia, is one of the islands which make up the Netherlands Antilles. Over its long history, it changed hands more than 20 times. The island has remained in Dutch hands since 1816. Vocanic in origin, and quite rugged along the coastal areas, it was once one of the busiest and most powerful commercial ports in the Caribbean. As a result of the British blockade during America's Revolutionary War, most goods destined for the new colonies flowed into St. Eustatius. It was not uncommon to see hundreds of supply ships off Oranjestad. When that war ended and mail and supplies were sent directly to the new United States, the economy of St. Eustatius changed dramatically. According to tradition, it was the first foreign port to salute (1776) the American flag. Tourism is the major industry today, and the island is a favorite destination for scuba diving aficionados and nature lovers. Territory: Highest point = Mt. Mazinga, 1,968 ft. (602m) St. Eustatius is hilly with a central flat plain. Sandy beaches are rare. Geographically, the island is saddle- shaped, with the 602 meter-high Mount Mazinga, colloquially called the Quill (a dormant volcano) to the southeast and the smaller pair Signal Hill/Little Mountain and Boven Mountain to the northwest. The bulk of the island's population lives in the "dip" between the two areas, which crosses the center of the island. The island is just 5 miles long and 2 miles wide; area: 21 sq. km. Location: It is in the northern, Leeward Islands portion of the West Indies, some distance southeast of the Virgin Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • (OECD) 2018 Progress Report on Preferential Regimes Has Found the Curaçao Tax Regimes Not to Be Harmful
    Newsflash OECD report on Curaçao tax regimes The Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2018 Progress Report on Preferential Regimes has found the Curaçao tax regimes not to be harmful. The OECD released a new publication on January 29, 2019, called “Harmful Tax Practices - 2018 Progress Report on Preferential Regimes”. The results show that jurisdictions have delivered on their commitment to comply with the standard on harmful tax practices, including their guarantee that preferential regimes align taxation with substance. The 2018 Progress Report on Preferential Regimes contains new conclusions on 57 regimes based on the assessment of preferential tax regimes comprising more than 120 member jurisdictions of the Inclusive Framework. Curaçao tax regimes Curaçao has amended three preferential regimes considered to be harmful (the exempt company regime, the export facility and the economic zone), and it has introduced the innovation box regime. The Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP) has assessed the amendments and the conclusion was as follows: the Curaçao Investment Company is not harmful, the innovation box is not harmful, the economic zone is out of scope, and the export regime has been abolished. The Curaçao Investment Company The exempt company has been replaced with the Curaçao Investment Company, which has been assessed to be “not harmful”. This means amendments have been taken into account to ensure the removal of harmful features. The report also mentions that substance requirements are in place and that no grandfathering is provided. The Innovation Box Regime The Innovation Box Regime was designed in compliance with FHTP standards and has been assessed to be “not harmful”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Ix Viii the World by Income
    The world by income Classified according to World Bank estimates of 2016 GNI per capita (current US dollars,Atlas method) Low income (less than $1,005) Greenland (Den.) Lower middle income ($1,006–$3,955) Upper middle income ($3,956–$12,235) Faroe Russian Federation Iceland Islands High income (more than $12,235) (Den.) Finland Norway Sweden No data Canada Netherlands Estonia Isle of Man (U.K.) Russian Latvia Denmark Fed. Lithuania Ireland U.K. Germany Poland Belarus Belgium Channel Islands (U.K.) Ukraine Kazakhstan Mongolia Luxembourg France Moldova Switzerland Romania Uzbekistan Dem.People’s Liechtenstein Bulgaria Georgia Kyrgyz Rep.of Korea United States Azer- Rep. Spain Monaco Armenia Japan Portugal Greece baijan Turkmenistan Tajikistan Rep.of Andorra Turkey Korea Gibraltar (U.K.) Syrian China Malta Cyprus Arab Afghanistan Tunisia Lebanon Rep. Iraq Islamic Rep. Bermuda Morocco Israel of Iran (U.K.) West Bank and Gaza Jordan Bhutan Kuwait Pakistan Nepal Algeria Libya Arab Rep. Bahrain The Bahamas Western Saudi Qatar Cayman Is. (U.K.) of Egypt Bangladesh Sahara Arabia United Arab India Hong Kong, SAR Cuba Turks and Caicos Is. (U.K.) Emirates Myanmar Mexico Lao Macao, SAR Haiti Cabo Mauritania Oman P.D.R. N. Mariana Islands (U.S.) Belize Jamaica Verde Mali Niger Thailand Vietnam Guatemala Honduras Senegal Chad Sudan Eritrea Rep. of Guam (U.S.) Yemen El Salvador The Burkina Cambodia Philippines Marshall Nicaragua Gambia Faso Djibouti Federated States Islands Guinea Benin Costa Rica Guyana Guinea- Brunei of Micronesia Bissau Ghana Nigeria Central Ethiopia Sri R.B. de Suriname Côte South Darussalam Panama Venezuela Sierra d’Ivoire African Lanka French Guiana (Fr.) Cameroon Republic Sudan Somalia Palau Colombia Leone Togo Malaysia Liberia Maldives Equatorial Guinea Uganda São Tomé and Príncipe Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • British Overseas Territories Law
    British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Overseas Territories
    INFORMATION PAPER United Kingdom Overseas Territories - Toponymic Information United Kingdom Overseas Territories (UKOTs), also known as British Overseas Territories (BOTs), have constitutional and historical links with the United Kingdom, but do not form part of the United Kingdom itself. The Queen is the Head of State of all the UKOTs, and she is represented by a Governor or Commissioner (apart from the UK Sovereign Base Areas that are administered by MOD). Each Territory has its own Constitution, its own Government and its own local laws. The 14 territories are: Anguilla; Bermuda; British Antarctic Territory (BAT); British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT); British Virgin Islands; Cayman Islands; Falkland Islands; Gibraltar; Montserrat; Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands; Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands; Turks and Caicos Islands; UK Sovereign Base Areas. PCGN recommend the term ‘British Overseas Territory Capital’ for the administrative centres of UKOTs. Production of mapping over the UKOTs does not take place systematically in the UK. Maps produced by the relevant territory, preferably by official bodies such as the local government or tourism authority, should be used for current geographical names. National government websites could also be used as an additional reference. Additionally, FCDO and MOD briefing maps may be used as a source for names in UKOTs. See the FCDO White Paper for more information about the UKOTs. ANGUILLA The territory, situated in the Caribbean, consists of the main island of Anguilla plus some smaller, mostly uninhabited islands. It is separated from the island of Saint Martin (split between Saint-Martin (France) and Sint Maarten (Netherlands)), 17km to the south, by the Anguilla Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Country Codes
    COUNTRY SHORT NAME DESCRIPTION CODE AD Andorra Principality of Andorra AE United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates AF Afghanistan The Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan AG Antigua and Barbuda Antigua and Barbuda (includes Redonda Island) AI Anguilla Anguilla AL Albania Republic of Albania AM Armenia Republic of Armenia Netherlands Antilles (includes Bonaire, Curacao, AN Netherlands Antilles Saba, St. Eustatius, and Southern St. Martin) AO Angola Republic of Angola (includes Cabinda) AQ Antarctica Territory south of 60 degrees south latitude AR Argentina Argentine Republic America Samoa (principal island Tutuila and AS American Samoa includes Swain's Island) AT Austria Republic of Austria Australia (includes Lord Howe Island, Macquarie Islands, Ashmore Islands and Cartier Island, and Coral Sea Islands are Australian external AU Australia territories) AW Aruba Aruba AX Aland Islands Aland Islands AZ Azerbaijan Republic of Azerbaijan BA Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina BB Barbados Barbados BD Bangladesh People's Republic of Bangladesh BE Belgium Kingdom of Belgium BF Burkina Faso Burkina Faso BG Bulgaria Republic of Bulgaria BH Bahrain Kingdom of Bahrain BI Burundi Republic of Burundi BJ Benin Republic of Benin BL Saint Barthelemy Saint Barthelemy BM Bermuda Bermuda BN Brunei Darussalam Brunei Darussalam BO Bolivia Republic of Bolivia Federative Republic of Brazil (includes Fernando de Noronha Island, Martim Vaz Islands, and BR Brazil Trindade Island) BS Bahamas Commonwealth of the Bahamas BT Bhutan Kingdom of Bhutan
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child Was Extended to Anguilla on 7 September 1994
    UNITED NATIONS CRC Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/41/Add.7 22 February 2000 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Initial reports of States parties due in 1996 Addendum OVERSEAS DEPENDENT TERRITORIES AND CROWN DEPENDENCIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND*1 [26 May 1999] * This document submitted by the Government of the United Kingdom contains initial reports relating to the Crown Dependencies of Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, Pitcairn Island, St. Helena and its dependencies, the Turks and Caicos Islands. 1 Annexes referred to in the text are available for consultation in the secretariat. GE.00-40860 (E) CRC/C/41/Add.7 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page ANGUILLA .......................................................................................... 1 - 53 3 BERMUDA........................................................................................... 54 - 129 13 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS................................................................ 130 - 185 36 CAYMAN ISLANDS............................................................................ 186 - 235 52 MONTSERRAT .................................................................................... 236 - 291 65 PITCAIRN ISLAND ............................................................................. 292 - 323 77 ST. HELENA AND ITS DEPENDENCIES..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to the Critically Endangered Christmas
    Tirtaningtyas & Hennicke: Threats to the criticallyContributed endangered Papers Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi 137 THREATS TO THE CRITICALLY ENDANGERED CHRISTMAS ISLAND FRIGATEBIRD FREGATA ANDREWSI IN JAKARTA BAY, INDONESIA, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RECONSIDERING CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FRANSISCA N. TIRTANINGTYAS1 & JANOS C. HENNICKE2,3 1Burung Laut Indonesia, Depok, East Java, 16421, Indonesia ([email protected]) 2Dept. of Ecology and Conservation, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 3CEBC-CNRS, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France Received 4 November 2014, accepted 26 February 2015 SUMMARY Tirtaningtyas, F.N. & HENNICKE, J.C. 2015. Threats to the critically endangered Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia, and implications for reconsidering conservation priorities. Marine Ornithology 43: 137–140. The Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi is one of the most endangered seabirds in the world. The reasons for its population decline are unknown, but recommended protection measures and management actions focus on the species’ breeding site. Threats to the species away from Christmas Island have received little consideration. Here, we report on several previously undescribed anthropogenic threats to Christmas Island Frigatebirds based on observations in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia: accidental entanglement in fishing gear, as well as capture, poisoning and shooting. Based on these findings, we suggest that it is imperative to reconsider the present management strategies and conservation priorities for the species and to urgently include protection measures away from Christmas Island. Keywords: Christmas Island Frigatebird, Fregata andrewsi, conservation, mortality, anthropogenic threats, Jakarta Bay, Southeast Asia INTRODUCTION Christmas Island Frigatebirds are exposed to threats in Southeast Asian waters, namely in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia, that might contribute The Christmas Island Frigatebird Fregata andrewsi is one of the to the unexplained population decline of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • St.!Eustatius! Children’S!Rights!In!The!Caribbean!Netherlands! Karin!Kloosterboer! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! May!2013! ! !
    Child on Sint Eustatius Children’s rights in the Caribbean Netherlands Karin Kloosterboer ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Child!on!St.!Eustatius! Children’s!rights!in!the!Caribbean!Netherlands! Karin!Kloosterboer! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! May!2013! ! ! ! ! Foreword! You!have!before!you!Child&on&St.&Eustatius.&Children’s&rights&in&the&Caribbean&Netherlands:! a!UNICEF!study!into!the!situation!of!children!growing!up!on!the!tropical!island!of!St.! Eustatius,!and!one!that!is!innovating!and!exceptional!for!several!reasons.! ! This!study!is!the!first!to!shed!light!on!all!aspects!of!the!lives!of!children!in!the!Caribbean! Netherlands.!!Child&on&St.&Eustatius!outlines!the!correlations!between!various!factors:! family!situation,!education,!health!and!health!care,!safety,!leisure!time,!participation,! housing!conditions,!and!financial!situation.!Alongside!this!report,!there!are!also!separate! reports!about!Saba!and!Bonaire.! ! ! This!is!also!a!pioneering!study!in!that!it!actually!surveyed!the!people!who!are!at!stake:!the! children!who!grow!up!on!the!islands.!Other!than!that,!the!study!also!drew!heavily!on!input! from!numerous!experts!who!play!a!role!in!children’s!lives!on!the!islands.!The!hearts!and! minds!of!these!–!often!inspired!–!professionals!contain!a!huge!wealth!of!information! about!both!children’s!lives!and!possibilities!for!improvement!of!their!lives.! ! This!study!paints!a!detailed!picture!that!the!researchers!have!subsequently!assessed! based!on!the!United!Nations!Convention!on!the!Rights!of!the!Child.!After!ratifying!this!
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Species of Christmas Island, Indian Ocean D.J
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 055–114 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.055-114 Endemic species of Christmas Island, Indian Ocean D.J. James1, P.T. Green2, W.F. Humphreys3,4 and J.C.Z. Woinarski5 1 73 Pozieres Ave, Milperra, New South Wales 2214, Australia. 2 Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia. 3 Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. 4 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. 5 NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory 0909, Australia, Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – Many oceanic islands have high levels of endemism, but also high rates of extinction, such that island species constitute a markedly disproportionate share of the world’s extinctions. One important foundation for the conservation of biodiversity on islands is an inventory of endemic species. In the absence of a comprehensive inventory, conservation effort often defaults to a focus on the better-known and more conspicuous species (typically mammals and birds). Although this component of island biota often needs such conservation attention, such focus may mean that less conspicuous endemic species (especially invertebrates) are neglected and suffer high rates of loss. In this paper, we review the available literature and online resources to compile a list of endemic species that is as comprehensive as possible for the 137 km2 oceanic Christmas Island, an Australian territory in the north-eastern Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, Saba and the European Netherlands Conclusions
    JOINED TOGETHER FOR FIVE YEARS BONAIRE, SINT EUSTATIUS, SABA AND THE EUROPEAN NETHERLANDS CONCLUSIONS Preface On 10 October 2010, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba each became a public entitie within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In the run-up to this transition, it was agreed to evaluate the results of the new political structure after five years. Expectations were high at the start of the political change. Various objectives have been achieved in these past five years. The levels of health care and education have improved significantly. But there is a lot that is still disappointing. Not all expectations people had on 10 October 2010 have been met. The 'Committee for the evaluation of the constitutional structure of the Caribbean Netherlands' is aware that people have different expectations of the evaluation. There is some level of scepticism. Some people assume that the results of the evaluation will lead to yet another report, which will not have a considerable contribution to the, in their eyes, necessary change. Other people's expectations of the evaluation are high and they expect the results of the evaluation to lead to a new moment or a relaunch for further agreements that will mark the beginning of necessary changes. In any case, five years is too short a period to be able to give a final assessment of the new political structure. However, five years is an opportune period of time to be able to take stock of the situation and identify successes and elements that need improving. Add to this the fact that the results of the evaluation have been repeatedly identified as the cause for making new agreements.
    [Show full text]