DOCSLIB.ORG

Data Collection: 18.09.-04.10.2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Data Collection: 18.09.-04.10.2018 Data Collection: 18.09.-04.10.2018 | Page1 Contents 1. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 3 2. OVERVIEW OF THE SECURITY SITUATION ......................................................................................... 3 3. DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 3 3.1 PREPARATION OF DATA COLLECTION .......................................................................................................... 3 3.2 DATA COLLECTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.3 DATA CLEANING AND ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 4 4. KEY FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 INTER-SECTORIAL QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................................ 5 4.2 GENERAL QUESTIONS RELATED TO HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE ............................................................................ 5 4.2.1 Priority Needs of Communities .................................................................................................. 5 4.1.1.1 IDPs and Refugees ................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2.1 Humanitarian Assistance ......................................................................................................... 7 4.3 CAMP COORDINATION MANAGEMENT SECTOR (CCCM) ................................................................................ 12 4.4 EDUCATION ................................................................................................................................. 15 4.4.1 Demographics ...................................................................................................................... 15 4.4.2 School Facilities .................................................................................................................... 17 4.5 NFI/SHELTER ............................................................................................................................... 22 4.6 FOOD SECURITY SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 28 4.7 HEALTH ...................................................................................................................................... 35 4.7.1 Medical Workers’ perspective: .................................................................................................. 35 4.7.2 Non-Medical workers’ perspective: ............................................................................................ 37 4.8 EARLY RECOVERY AND LIVELIHOODS ....................................................................................................... 42 4.9 PROTECTION ................................................................................................................................ 49 4.9.1 explosive hazards: ................................................................................................................. 49 4.9.2 child protection .................................................................................................................... 51 4.9.3 Movement restriction: ............................................................................................................. 53 4.9.5 Coping Strategy: .................................................................................................................... 53 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 56 | Page2 1. Purpose and objectives The main purpose of the assessment was to capture the current situation of the affected communities where Violet is assessing to potentially exPand and to contribute towards targeted, integrated and evidence-based program strategies across the field sites. The specific objectives of the MSNA were: • To identify the current and most prioritized needs and the most vulnerable communities within the affected population based on Key Informant Interviews • To better understand the contextual issues affecting the population in their livelihoods; • To develop an evidence base specific to Violet response program to inform the program strategy development for location. 2. Overview of the Security Situation - From December 2018 to end of January 2019. - There are a lot of military measures taken by the Turkish government regarding Possible battles in Manbaj. - There are also many preparations by the Turkish Red Crescent and AFAD indicates the aPProach of military oPerations in Manbaj. - Turkey and the USA have intensified political efforts on the one hand, and Turkey and Russia on the other. - The latest effort was to allow Turkish air to enter the airspace controlled by Russia and the International Alliance. - All these and other indications Point to the ProXimity of military oPerations there, which could be accompanied by many civilian displacements. - Large parts of the Free Army are equipped for battle according to several field sources. - It is very likely that military oPerations will haPPen and there may be displacements towards the areas of Graplus, Azaz, Bab and Afrin. 3. Data Collection Methodology 3.1 Preparation of Data Collection To achieve the objectives of the multi-sectoral assessment, the data connection was prepared in three stages: (1) Firstly, the modality and questionnaire was discussed and jointly the agreement was made to to adopt the HNO 2019 questionnaire in the assessment to avoid duPlication of work and to strengthen synergies as Violet has covered several places during its participation in HNO. (2) Secondly, a data collection strategy was defined including the data collection model. | Page3 (3) Lastly, the targeted areas that will be covered with the multi-sectoral assessment were selected according to population, population-dense areas and covering widesPread areas in Jarablus and Azaz, and Albab districts. 3.2 Data Collection After the Preparation of the data collection, the collection took place and was arranged as well as coordinated in three phases: (1) Training of MEAL staff on the surveys and data collection (2) Coordination with local councils to facilitate the data collection (3) Interviewing the Key Informants based on the inter-sector questionnaire with 24 interviews per sector covering 24 locations (total of 192 interviews have been conducted). Violet’s MEAL Team has used Kobo ToolboX to collect data to increase the quality of the data. 3.3 Data Cleaning and Analysis After the data has been collected, the MEAL Team has initially cleaned the data. Afterwards, the data has been analysed by the MEAL team in cooperation with the sector coordinators of the organization. | Page4 4. Key Findings 4.1 Inter-Sectorial Questionnaire The assessment was conducted from 18th of September to 4th of October 2018; in this time sPan, the MEAL team has covered 24 areas with each one key informant interview as seen in the following table. In total, 192 interviews have been conducted across the sectors. Governorate District Sub-district Community # of KII Aghtrin 1 Aghtrin Ziyadiyeh 1 Suran Suran 1 Mare’ Mare’ 1 Azaz 1 Maarin 1 Azaz Shmarekh 1 Shamarin 1 Azaz Kafr Kalbein 1 Kaljibrin 1 Niddeh 1 Nayara 1 Aleppo Yahmul 1 Bab Laymun 1 Ar-Ra’ee Sandi 1 Al Bab Al Bab 1 Al Bab Qabasin 1 Thaheriya Jrables 1 Ghandorah Ghandorah 1 Arab Azzah 1 Jarablus Jamel 1 Maghayer - Qorq Mghar 1 Jarablus Jarablus 1 Marma Elhajar 1 Grand Total 24 4.2 General Questions Related to Humanitarian Assistance All key informant interviewees (96% male; average age of 44 years) act as community focal point (CFP) and were able to answer questions across sectors. Besides acting as CFP, 71% of the interviewed are holding a position in the local administration or the local council. The remaining 29% dispose of community leaders, tribe leaders or Mukhtar. The interviews have been conducted face-to-face. 4.2.1 Priority Needs of Communities As initial question, the interviewees were asked to rank the main concerns of the related communities on three levels. With strong indications of 35-40% of the resPondents agreeing on the Priorities, the following has been identified as main concerns: (1) basic services such as electricity, fuel resources etc., (2) access to drinking water and (3) access to humanitarian aid. The following charts underline the response to the ranking and also further asPects such as emPloyment oPPortunities, Physical and logistic constraints to move within the community as well as shelter and housing oPtions. | Page5 First Priority Concern EmPloyment oPPortunities / Income sources 15% Physical and logistic constraints to move around community… 20% Drinking water 30% Basic services (electricity, fuel resources etc.) 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Second Priority Concern EmPloyment oPPortunities / Income sources 14% Physical and logistic constraints to move around community… 19% Basic services (electricity, fuel resources etc.) 24% Drinking water 43% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Third Priority Concern Basic services (electricity, fuel resources
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRE Violet MSNA Euphrat Shield 20190304
    VIOLET MULTI-SECTOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT NORTHERN ALEPPO MARCH 2019 BACKGROUND OF THE MSNA SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES DATA COLLECTION i. To identify the current and most MODALITY Adoption of the HNO 2019 prioritized needs and the most questionnaire to avoid duplication vulnerable communities within the and strengthen synergies. affected population based on Key Informant Interviews TARGET AREAS Chosen according to population ii. To better understand the density (incl. rural and urban contextual issues affecting the areas) in Jarablus, Azaz and Al population in their livelihoods; Bab district. iii. To develop an evidence base PROCEDURE 1. Training on data collection specific to Violet response 2. Coordination with Local Councils program to inform the program 3. Interviewing of key informants strategy development for based on inter-sector questionnaire. location. Governorate District Sub-district Community Aghtrin TARGETED Aghtrin Ziyadiyeh AREAS Suran Suran Mare’ Mare’ Azaz Maarin th Between the 18 of Azaz Shmarekh th September and the 04 of Shamarin October 2018, 24 areas Azaz Kafr Kalbein have been assessed with Kaljibrin each one key informant Niddeh interview (based on Nayara Aleppo adapted questionnaire) per Yahmul selected sector. A total of Bab Laymun Ar-Ra’ee 192 interviews have been Sandi Al Bab conducted. Al Bab Al Bab Qabasin Thaheriya Jrables Ghandorah Ghandorah Arab Azzah Jarablus Jamel Maghayer - Qorq Mghar Jarablus Jarablus Marma Elhajar OUTLINE OF MSNA REPORT 1. Purpose and Objectives 2. Overview of Security Situation 3. Data Collection Methodology 1. Preparation of Data Collection 2. Data Collection 3. Data Cleaning and Analysis 4. Key Findings 1. Inter-Sectorial Questonnaire 2. Humanitarian Assistance in General 3.
    [Show full text]
  • P-Code Map of Syria A12 A13 37.5° N 37.5° N
    35° E 35.5° E 36° E 36.5° E 37° E 37.5° E 38° E 38.5° E 39° E 39.5° E 40° E 40.5° E 41° E 41.5° E 42° E 42.5° E 43° E 38.5° N 38.5° N 38° N 38° N TURKEY P-code map of Syria A12 A13 37.5° N 37.5° N Map shows the pages number of the P- 37° N B3 B4 B5 B6 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 37° N code atlas C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 36.5° N 36.5° N Map Page 36° N 36° N D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E10 E11 35.5° N 35.5° N 35° N 35° N F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 34.5° N 34.5° N 34° N 34° N H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H10 I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 33.5° N 33.5° N 0 50 100 150 J1 J2 J3 J4 J5 J6 33° N kilometres 33° N Scale 1:200,000 (at A3 size) Data sources Boundaries: COD-FOD, Europa Technologies IRAQ K1 K2 K3 K4 32.5° N 32.5° N Created 14 Jan 2013 / 17:00 JORDAN Map document MA8000_pcode_reference_v1 Projection / datum Geographic / WGS84 32° N The depiction and use of boundaries, names and 32° N associated data shown here do not imply endorsement or acceptance by MapAction.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 19 December 2019
    SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 19 December 2019 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 14 December 2019; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 19 DECEMBER 2019 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 7110 925 3048 violence Development of conflict incidents from June 2017 to June 2019 2 Battles 1282 659 4216 Strategic developments 602 9 20 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 527 339 658 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 110 1 5 Riots 12 1 1 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 9643 1934 7948 Disclaimer 8 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 14 December 2019). Development of conflict incidents from June 2017 to June 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 14 December 2019). 2 SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 19 DECEMBER 2019 Methodology on what level of detail is reported. Thus, towns may represent the wider region in which an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province The data used in this report was collected by the Armed Conflict Location & Event is known.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR Syria /Aleppo SO End of Year 2017 / Factsheet
    UNHCR SYRIA / ALEPPO / FACTSHEET UNHCR Syria /Aleppo SO End of year 2017 / Factsheet January – December 2017 Highlights Population of Concern Government Number of Sub-Districts IDPs Returnees Resident pop Total Pop Aleppo 40 961,845 444,500 2,164,195 3,570,540 IDPs 961,845 27% Resident pop 2,164,195 61% Returnees 444,500 12% Presence in Aleppo UNHCR National Staff 45 UNHCR International Staff 9 UNHCR Partners 21 UN Team in Aleppo 13 www.unhcr.org /sy 1 Aleppo / Factsheet / End of Year 2017 OVERVIEW ¡ Aleppo is the second largest city in Syria. It is one of the most ancient cities in the world, and has been inhabited since the sixth millennium BC. Aleppo used to be the economic and industrial hub of Syria, it is well-known for its castle, traditional shops and unique Levantine handicrafts. ACCESSIBILITY ¡ Over the past seven years, owing to the fragile security situation and continuous military operations in the governorate, the office faced many challenges in having access to the 8 districts of the governorate. Since the beginning of 2017, major developments have taken 418 UNHCR ORVs place on both military and political fronts that allowed 19 Community Centers greater humanitarian access to locations in the 5 districts of 7 PHC clinics Jebel Saman, As- Safira, Menbej, Azaz and Al Bab, whereas the three districts of Afrin, Jarablous and Ain Al Arab remained inaccessible. Who Has the Newly Accessible District Greatest Control Accessibility Status Areas in 2017 Over the District? Afrin YPG No access. Access is limited to locations under Azaz NSAGs GoS’ effective control.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Terms of Reference UNHCR Shelter/NFI Assessment Whole of Syria
    Research Terms of Reference UNHCR Shelter/NFI Assessment Whole of Syria June 2018 V2 1. Executive Summary Country of intervention Syria Type of Emergency □ Natural disaster X Conflict □ Emergency Type of Crisis □ Sudden onset □ Slow X Protracted onset Mandating Body/ Agency UNHCR Project Code 16iAGA 2H9 REACH Pillar X Planning in Displace Building Community Emergencies ment Resilience Overall Research June – November 2018 Timeframe (from research design to final outputs / M&E) Research Timeframe 1. Start collect data: 24/6/2018 4. Data sent for validation: 24/7/2018 Add planned deadlines 2. Data collected: 22/7/2018 5. Outputs sent for validation: 30/9/2018 (for first cycle if more than 1) 3. Data analysed: 1/9/2018 6. Outputs published: 31/10/2018 Number of assessments X Single assessment (one cycle) □ Multi assessment (more than one cycle) Humanitarian milestones Milestone Deadline Specify what will the □ Donor plan/strategy assessment inform and when e.g. The shelter cluster will use X Inter-cluster plan/strategy (HNO 2019) 1/8/2019 this data to draft its Revised □ Cluster plan/strategy Flash Appeal; □ NGO platform plan/strategy □ Other (Specify): Audience type Dissemination Audience Type & □ Strategic X General Product Mailing (e.g. mail to NGO consortium; HCT participants; Donors) Dissemination Specify who X Programmatic will the assessment inform and X Cluster Mailing (Education, Shelter and X Operational how you will disseminate to WASH) and presentation of findings at next inform the audience □ [Other, Specify] cluster meeting X Presentation of findings (Key findings presentation – facilitated by the cluster) X Website Dissemination (Relief Web & REACH Resource Centre) www.reach-initiative.org 1 X All outputs disseminated through REACH Syria mailing list (over 200 individuals including cluster leads and chairs, WoS actors and hubs); joint analysis workshop with cluster members in the South hub; presentation of findings at cluster meetings both in North and South hubs.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA, YEAR 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020
    SYRIA, YEAR 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; in- cident data: ACLED, 20 June 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, YEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 13672 1753 5751 violence Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2019 2 Battles 2814 1344 8296 Strategic developments 1348 19 37 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 1167 724 1169 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 331 2 14 Riots 25 3 5 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 19357 3845 15272 Disclaimer 9 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). 2 SYRIA, YEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA, YEAR 2018: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 26 February 2020
    SYRIA, YEAR 2018: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 26 February 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 22 February 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, YEAR 2018: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 26 FEBRUARY 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 12984 2941 11802 violence Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2018 2 Battles 4274 2143 16001 Strategic developments 1847 9 16 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 1188 892 2264 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 536 2 2 Riots 15 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 20844 5987 30085 Disclaimer 10 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 22 February 2020). Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2018 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 22 February 2020). 2 SYRIA, YEAR 2018: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 26 FEBRUARY 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
    [Show full text]
  • Giovanna Giulia Zavettieri Migrare Dall'europa in Siria Da Foreign Fighter
    MONICA MORAZZONI - GIOVANNA GIULIA ZAVETTIERI MIGRARE DALL’EUROPA IN SIRIA DA FOREIGN FIGHTER A RETURNER* Premessa. – Gli studi condotti fino ad oggi non esauriscono l’interesse di una nuova riflessione sui flussi migratori dei foreign fighters1 (d’ora in poi ffs) dai paesi europei verso la Siria – ovvero verso i territori controllati dalle organizzazioni jihadiste – analizzati nelle loro traiettorie di andata e ritorno. Il tema apre la possibilità di ulteriori riflessioni sulla collocazione di uomini, donne e bambini ffs, ieri nello Stato Islamico, oggi nello sce- nario geopolitico complesso e confuso della Siria. Uno scenario reso an- cora più articolato dai Curdi, che hanno combattuto l’IS nel nord del paese, e che detengono nelle proprie carceri numerosi jihadisti. Si pone quindi un doppio problema, da un lato assicurare uno stato di detenzione in Siria rispettoso dei diritti umani (e non è solo una questio- ne giuridica ma anche di tenuta per le democrazie di tutto il mondo), dall’altro assicurare un rimpatrio in Europa “gestito” dalle forze di sicu- Sebbene frutto di riflessioni comuni, il contributo si deve a Monica Morazzoni per i paragrafi I foreign fighters europei: arruolarsi e partire e I returnees: un problema di rimpatri e a Giovanna Giulia Zavettieri per i paragrafi I profili dei foreign fighters europei e I ruoli dei fo- reign fighters in Siria. Premessa e conclusioni sono di entrambe le autrici. 1 Tra gli studiosi non esiste una definizione comunemente accettata (cfr. Schmid, Tin- nes, 2015); chi scrive utilizza tale espressione, divenuta peraltro popolare negli ultimi anni, in senso lato. Il ff è colui che è partito dal suo paese di origine o di residenza abi- tuale e si è unito allo Stato Islamico non necessariamente per prendere personalmente parte alle ostilità, quanto piuttosto per diventarne cittadino (Morazzoni, Zavettieri, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • P-Code Tables for Syria
    P-code tables for Syria This document is the index to the MapAction P-code atlas - MA8000_pcode_reference_v1. The locator map below indicates the map page number by geographical area. The tables on the following pages are grouped by map page number used in the atlas. There are p- codes for administrative boundaries and settlements with the following hierarchy; · Level 1 - Mohafaza · Level 2 - Mantika · Level 3 -Nahaya · Communities and settlements Locator Map P-Code Source: COD-FOD Registry Document Create Date: 16 January 2013 Map Page - A13 Community Community Nahya Nahya p-code Mantika Mantika p-code Mohafaza Mohafaza Latitude Longitude p-code p-code Deir Dijla C4857 Al Malika SY080300 Al Malika SY0803 Al-Hasakeh SY08 37.26888 42.28371 Deir Yassin C4855 Al Malika SY080300 Al Malika SY0803 Al-Hasakeh SY08 37.25616 42.19655 Ein Diwar C4888 Al Malika SY080300 Al Malika SY0803 Al-Hasakeh SY08 37.28655 42.19178 Jisr C4837 Al Malika SY080300 Al Malika SY0803 Al-Hasakeh SY08 37.23698 42.18550 Kisweh C4853 Al Malika SY080300 Al Malika SY0803 Al-Hasakeh SY08 37.24134 42.25834 Mazraet Msallam C4895 Al Malika SY080300 Al Malika SY0803 Al-Hasakeh SY08 37.27784 42.24118 Rihaniya Malekiyeh C4815 Al Malika SY080300 Al Malika SY0803 Al-Hasakeh SY08 37.25197 42.22744 Page 1 of 144 Map Page - B3 Community Community Nahya Nahya p-code Mantika Mantika p-code Mohafaza Mohafaza Latitude Longitude p-code p-code Aaliaa - Ali Baski C1458 Raju SY020303 Afrin SY0203 Aleppo SY02 36.74844 36.67206 Ada C1479 Raju SY020303 Afrin SY0203 Aleppo SY02 36.76914 36.66089
    [Show full text]