Data Collection: 18.09.-04.10.2018 | Page1 Contents 1. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 3 2. OVERVIEW OF THE SECURITY SITUATION ......................................................................................... 3 3. DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 3 3.1 PREPARATION OF DATA COLLECTION .......................................................................................................... 3 3.2 DATA COLLECTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.3 DATA CLEANING AND ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 4 4. KEY FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 INTER-SECTORIAL QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................................ 5 4.2 GENERAL QUESTIONS RELATED TO HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE ............................................................................ 5 4.2.1 Priority Needs of Communities .................................................................................................. 5 4.1.1.1 IDPs and Refugees ................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2.1 Humanitarian Assistance ......................................................................................................... 7 4.3 CAMP COORDINATION MANAGEMENT SECTOR (CCCM) ................................................................................ 12 4.4 EDUCATION ................................................................................................................................. 15 4.4.1 Demographics ...................................................................................................................... 15 4.4.2 School Facilities .................................................................................................................... 17 4.5 NFI/SHELTER ............................................................................................................................... 22 4.6 FOOD SECURITY SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 28 4.7 HEALTH ...................................................................................................................................... 35 4.7.1 Medical Workers’ perspective: .................................................................................................. 35 4.7.2 Non-Medical workers’ perspective: ............................................................................................ 37 4.8 EARLY RECOVERY AND LIVELIHOODS ....................................................................................................... 42 4.9 PROTECTION ................................................................................................................................ 49 4.9.1 explosive hazards: ................................................................................................................. 49 4.9.2 child protection .................................................................................................................... 51 4.9.3 Movement restriction: ............................................................................................................. 53 4.9.5 Coping Strategy: .................................................................................................................... 53 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 56 | Page2 1. Purpose and objectives The main purpose of the assessment was to capture the current situation of the affected communities where Violet is assessing to potentially exPand and to contribute towards targeted, integrated and evidence-based program strategies across the field sites. The specific objectives of the MSNA were: • To identify the current and most prioritized needs and the most vulnerable communities within the affected population based on Key Informant Interviews • To better understand the contextual issues affecting the population in their livelihoods; • To develop an evidence base specific to Violet response program to inform the program strategy development for location. 2. Overview of the Security Situation - From December 2018 to end of January 2019. - There are a lot of military measures taken by the Turkish government regarding Possible battles in Manbaj. - There are also many preparations by the Turkish Red Crescent and AFAD indicates the aPProach of military oPerations in Manbaj. - Turkey and the USA have intensified political efforts on the one hand, and Turkey and Russia on the other. - The latest effort was to allow Turkish air to enter the airspace controlled by Russia and the International Alliance. - All these and other indications Point to the ProXimity of military oPerations there, which could be accompanied by many civilian displacements. - Large parts of the Free Army are equipped for battle according to several field sources. - It is very likely that military oPerations will haPPen and there may be displacements towards the areas of Graplus, Azaz, Bab and Afrin. 3. Data Collection Methodology 3.1 Preparation of Data Collection To achieve the objectives of the multi-sectoral assessment, the data connection was prepared in three stages: (1) Firstly, the modality and questionnaire was discussed and jointly the agreement was made to to adopt the HNO 2019 questionnaire in the assessment to avoid duPlication of work and to strengthen synergies as Violet has covered several places during its participation in HNO. (2) Secondly, a data collection strategy was defined including the data collection model. | Page3 (3) Lastly, the targeted areas that will be covered with the multi-sectoral assessment were selected according to population, population-dense areas and covering widesPread areas in Jarablus and Azaz, and Albab districts. 3.2 Data Collection After the Preparation of the data collection, the collection took place and was arranged as well as coordinated in three phases: (1) Training of MEAL staff on the surveys and data collection (2) Coordination with local councils to facilitate the data collection (3) Interviewing the Key Informants based on the inter-sector questionnaire with 24 interviews per sector covering 24 locations (total of 192 interviews have been conducted). Violet’s MEAL Team has used Kobo ToolboX to collect data to increase the quality of the data. 3.3 Data Cleaning and Analysis After the data has been collected, the MEAL Team has initially cleaned the data. Afterwards, the data has been analysed by the MEAL team in cooperation with the sector coordinators of the organization. | Page4 4. Key Findings 4.1 Inter-Sectorial Questionnaire The assessment was conducted from 18th of September to 4th of October 2018; in this time sPan, the MEAL team has covered 24 areas with each one key informant interview as seen in the following table. In total, 192 interviews have been conducted across the sectors. Governorate District Sub-district Community # of KII Aghtrin 1 Aghtrin Ziyadiyeh 1 Suran Suran 1 Mare’ Mare’ 1 Azaz 1 Maarin 1 Azaz Shmarekh 1 Shamarin 1 Azaz Kafr Kalbein 1 Kaljibrin 1 Niddeh 1 Nayara 1 Aleppo Yahmul 1 Bab Laymun 1 Ar-Ra’ee Sandi 1 Al Bab Al Bab 1 Al Bab Qabasin 1 Thaheriya Jrables 1 Ghandorah Ghandorah 1 Arab Azzah 1 Jarablus Jamel 1 Maghayer - Qorq Mghar 1 Jarablus Jarablus 1 Marma Elhajar 1 Grand Total 24 4.2 General Questions Related to Humanitarian Assistance All key informant interviewees (96% male; average age of 44 years) act as community focal point (CFP) and were able to answer questions across sectors. Besides acting as CFP, 71% of the interviewed are holding a position in the local administration or the local council. The remaining 29% dispose of community leaders, tribe leaders or Mukhtar. The interviews have been conducted face-to-face. 4.2.1 Priority Needs of Communities As initial question, the interviewees were asked to rank the main concerns of the related communities on three levels. With strong indications of 35-40% of the resPondents agreeing on the Priorities, the following has been identified as main concerns: (1) basic services such as electricity, fuel resources etc., (2) access to drinking water and (3) access to humanitarian aid. The following charts underline the response to the ranking and also further asPects such as emPloyment oPPortunities, Physical and logistic constraints to move within the community as well as shelter and housing oPtions. | Page5 First Priority Concern EmPloyment oPPortunities / Income sources 15% Physical and logistic constraints to move around community… 20% Drinking water 30% Basic services (electricity, fuel resources etc.) 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Second Priority Concern EmPloyment oPPortunities / Income sources 14% Physical and logistic constraints to move around community… 19% Basic services (electricity, fuel resources etc.) 24% Drinking water 43% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Third Priority Concern Basic services (electricity, fuel resources