Traffic Impact Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MEMORANDUM TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WEST WITS MINING OPERATION TO BE SITUATED OVER SEVERAL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF ROODEPOORT, FLORIDA AND MEADOWLANDS WEST IN THE CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY, GAUTENG PROVINCE APRIL 2019 Prepared for: Prepared by: SLR Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd Siyazi Gauteng Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd P O Box 1596 P O BOX 71333 Cramerview WILLOWS 2060 GAUTENG PROVINCE 0041 SLR Reference: 0246 Siyazi Reference: 18002A NEMA Regulations (2014) (as amended) ‐ Appendix 6 Relevant section in report Details of the specialist who prepared the report Refer to page IV and attached curriculum The expertise of that person to compile a specialist report vitae. including a curriculum vitae A declaration that the person is independent in a form as may Refer to page III. be specified by the competent authority An indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the Section 1, Page 1. report was prepared An indication of the quality and age of base data used for the Section 2.1. Traffic count data. specialist report A description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts Section 3. of the proposed development and levels of acceptable change The duration date and season of the site investigation and the Not relevant to traffic data. relevance of the season to the outcome of the assessment A description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the specialised process inclusive of Section 2.1. Traffic count data. equipment and modelling used Details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the proposed activity or activities and its Section 2.4, Page 48 associated structures and infrastructure inclusive of a site plan identifying site alternatives An identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers Section 2.4, Page 49 A map superimposing the activity including the associated structures and infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities Section 2.4, Page 49 of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; A description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or Section 2.1.1, Page 10 gaps in knowledge; A description of the findings and potential implications of such Section 3 findings on the impact of the proposed activity or activities Any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr Section 3 Any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation Section 3 Any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or None environmental authorisation A reasoned opinion as to whether the proposed activity or portions thereof should be authorised and regarding the Section 3 acceptability of the proposed activity or activities If the opinion is that the proposed activity or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and Section 3 mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr, and where applicable, the closure plan A description of any consultation process that was undertaken Not relevant during the course of preparing the specialist report A summary and copies of any comments received during any Appendix E consultation process and where applicable all responses thereto Any other information requested by the competent authority. Not relevant ______________________________________________________________________________ TIA – Proposed West Wits Mining Development II Declaration of Independence I, Leon Roets, hereby declare that Siyazi Gauteng Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd, an independent consulting firm, has no interest or personal gains in this project whatsoever, except receiving fair payment for rendering an independent professional service. Consultant name: Leon Roets Signature: Date: 17 April 2019 ______________________________________________________________________________ TIA – Proposed West Wits Mining Development III VERIFICATION PAGE PROPOSED WEST WITS MINING OPERATION TO BE SITUATED OVER SEVERAL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE PROJECT NAME: VICINITY OF ROODEPOORT, FLORIDA AND MEADOWLANDS WEST IN THE CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY, GAUTENG PROVINCE Project No: Date: Report Status: 18002A April 2019 Draft F1-0 Prepared by: Commissioned by: Siyazi Gauteng Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd SLR Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) P O Box 71333 Ltd Willows, Gauteng Province SLR Africa (Block 7) 0041 Fourways Manor Office Park 2191, Cnr Roos and Macbeth Streets Fourways, Johannesburg, 2060 Author: Report reviewed by and compiled under the supervision of: Paul van der Westhuizen Leon Roets (Pr Eng) Professional Number: 960547 Contact information: Contact information: Cell: +27 79 690 8069 Cell: +27 82 371 0253 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Declaration by registered professional: The undersigned has been appointed as the registered professional for this Traffic Impact Statement and has applied due diligence to the content of this report and endeavoured to ensure that the TIS is free of technical errors and takes full responsibility for its contents. Name: Leon Roets Address: Plot 22 Doornbult, Polokwane, Limpopo Province Contact Details: Cell: +27 82 371 0253 Email: [email protected] Qualifications: B Eng (Civil Eng.) ECSA Registration Number: 960547 (Attached to report) Signature: ______________________________________________________________________________ TIA – Proposed West Wits Mining Development IV TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. DETAILED INFORMATION RELATED DATA COLLECTED AND INVESTIGATIONS .................................................... 9 2.1 STATUS QUO OF LAND USE, AS WELL AS ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS ...................... 10 2.1.1 EXISTING LAND USE INFORMATION ............................................................................ 10 2.1.2 EXISTING ROAD CHARACTERISTICS AND MODAL DISTRIBUTION .......................... 10 2.1.3 TRAFFIC COUNTS AS BASIS FOR MAKING TRAFFIC-ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 FUTURE LAND USE AND ROAD CHARACTERISTICS....................................................................... 26 2.2.1 LAND USE INFORMATION, INCLUDING EXISTING AND PROPOSED LATENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA ..................................................................................... 26 2.2.2 FUTURE PLANNED ROADS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED MINING DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................... 27 2.2.3 DETERMINATION OF VEHICLE TRIPS EXPECTED TO BE GENERATED DUE TO THE PROPOSED MINING DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 29 2.2.4 DETERMINATION OF THE TOTAL TRAFFIC EXPECTED TO BE GENERATED AT THE RELEVANT INTERSECTIONS ......................................................................................... 37 2.2.5 ACCESS OPTIONS FOR CONCIDERATION TO AND FROM THE PROPOSED MINING DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................... 38 2.3 DETERMINATION OF THE LEVELS OF SERVICE AT THE RELEVANT INTERSECTIONS .............. 46 2.4 SENSITIVE ROAD SECTIONS AND INTERSECTIONS RELATED TO EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 49 2.5 INFORMATION REQUESTED BY RELEVANT ROAD AUTHORITY ................................................... 57 2.6 CONSULTATION WITH INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES (IAP) ........................................... 57 2.7 OTHER TRAFFIC-RELATED MATTERS .............................................................................................. 57 3. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................. 60 3.1 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................. 60 3.1.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT DURING THE RESPECTIVE PHASES .............................................. 60 3.1.2 SITE ACCESSIBILITY ...................................................................................................... 61 3.1.3 FUTURE PLANNED ROADS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED MINING DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................... 61 3.1.4 OTHER TRAFFIC RELATED MATTERS .......................................................................... 61 3.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 64 3.2.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACCESS TO AND FROM THE PROPOSED MINING DEVELOPMENT SITES .................................................................................................... 64 3.2.2 SUMMARY OF REQUIRED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT AND WITH THE PROPOSED MINING DEVELOPEMNT ................................................................... 72 3.2.3 DETAILED SUMMARY OF NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT AND WITH THE PROPOSED MINING DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 72 3.2.4 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...............................................................................