1900 Journal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Monday, October 8, 1900. The court met pursuant to law. Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Brewer, Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Shiras, Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Peckham. Robert J. Perkins of New Orleans, La., Willard P. Voorhees of New Brunswick, N. J., Walter S. Horton of Peoria, 111., Paul Jay Daly of Salt Lake City, Utah, Charles B. Pavlicek of Chicago, 111., James W. Hyde of Chicago, 111., John A. Sanborn of San Francisco, Cal., Matthew C. Fleming of New York City, Waller S. Baker of Waco, Tex., David W. Baird of Louisville, Ky., Jasper E. Snow of Galesburg, 111., and Adelbert Moot of Buffalo, N. Y., were admitted to practice. The Chief Justice announced that all motions noticed for to-day would be heard to-morrow, and that the court would commence the call of the docket to-morrow pursuant to the twenty-sixth rule. Adjourned until to-morrow at 12 o'clock. The day call for Tuesday, October 9, will be as follows : Nos. 7, 10, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28 and 36. O 7550 1 ; 2 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Tuesday, October 9, 1900. Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Gray, Mr. Justice Brewer, Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Shiras, Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Peckham. Hollis Russell Bailey of Boston, Mass., and Pierson L. Halsey of Milwaukee, Wis., were admitted to practice. No. 9, Original. The United States, plaintiff, v. The State of North Carolina No. 10, Original. The United States, plaintiff, v. The State of South Carolina; No. 11, Original. The United States, plaintiff, v. The State of Florida; and No. 12, Original. The United. States, plaintiff, v. The State' of Lou- isiana. Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor-General Richards for the plaintiff. Nos. 387 and 406. Charles F. W. Neely, appellant, v. William Henkel, United States marshal, etc. Motions to advance submitted by Mr. Solicitor-General Richards for the appellee. No. 345. The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, petitioner, v. J. E. Ross, administrator, etc.. Petition for •writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the fifth circuit submitted by Mr. Charles E. Patterson and Mr. George Clark for the petitioner, and by Mr. Waller S. Baker for the respondent. No. 281. The City of New Orleans, petitioner, v. Ann Warner et al., etc. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. Richard De Gray for the respondents. No. 340. John H. Goetze, appellant, v. The United States. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. Edward C. Perkins for the appellant. No. 41 9. Fourteen Diamond Rings, etc., plaintiff in error, v. The United States. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. Solicitor-General Richards in behalf of counsel for plaintiff in error. No. 173. The Duluth and Iron Range Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, v. The,County of St. Louis. Advanced to be heard after No. 20, on motion of Mr. Frank h. Kellogg for the plaintiff in error. No. 374. The Bienville Water Supply Company, appellant, r. The City of Mobile et al. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted by Mr. 7550 2 3 B. B. Boone and Mr. E. L. Rnssell in support of motions, and by Mr. D. P. Bestor in opposition thereto. On motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney in behalf of Mr. John G. Johnson, leave granted to file additional brief for the appellant within ten days, and to Mr. B. B. Boone to reply thereto within ten days thereafter. No. 440. Alice Weil, widow, etc., et al., appellants, v. The United States. Appeal from the Court of Claims. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. William A. Maury for the appellee. Motion for mandate submitted. No. 266 of 1899. Wilberforce Sully, trustee, et al., plaintiff in error, r. The American National Bank et al. Motion to retax costs submitted by Mr. E. J. Baxter for the American National Bank in support of motion, and by Mr. R. E. L. Mounteastle, Mr. Samuel C. Williams and Mr, T. S. Webb in opposition thereto. No. 201. Thomas F. Farrell et al., plaintiffs in error, v. The West Chicago Park Commission. Motion to vacate supersedeas submitted by Mr. F. A. Riddle for the defendant in error, with leave to Mr. George W. Wilbur for the plaintiffs in error to file brief in opposition within ten days. Motion to attach for contempt submitted by Mr. George W. Wilbur in support of motion, and by Mr. F. A. Riddle in opposition thereto. No. 223. A. L. Gusman, etc., appellant, v. L. H. Marrero, sheriff, etc. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. Robert J. Perkins for the appellee. No. 285. Alfred S. Woodworth, petitioner, v.' Albert H. Nute et al. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the first circuit submitted by Mr. Frederic Dodge for the petitioner, and by Mr. Eugene P. Carver and Mr. E. E. Blodgett for the respondents. No. 292. Richard Francis Masters, claimant, etc., petitioner, v. Horace M. Sargent. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the first circuit submitted by Mr. Frederic Dodge in behalf of Mr. Frederic Cunningham, and Mr. Lewis S. Dabney for the 'petitioner. No. Original. Ex parte: In the matter of Edgar De Bara, peti- — , tioner. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of habeas corpus sub- mitted by Mr. D. W. Baker for the petitioner, and by Mr. Solicitor- General Richards in opposition thereto. No. 382. George II. Tompkins, petitioner, v. The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the fourth circuit submitted by Mr. F. B. Enslow for the petitioner. 4 No. 319. Frank W. Funk, petitioner, v. The United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of the District of Colum- bia submitted by Mr. Alexander Wolf and Mr. D. W. Baker for the petitioner, and by Mr, Solicitor-General Richards for the respondent. No. 309. William S. Jewett, petitioner, v. The United States. Peti- tion for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the first circuit submitted by Mr. H. It. Bailey and Mr. M. F. Dick- inson, jr., for the petitioner, and by Mr. Solicitor-General Richards for the respondent. No. 396. Charles C. McChord et ak, appellants, v. The Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company; No. 397. Charles C. McChord et ak, appellants, v. The Louisville, Henderson and St. Louis Railway Company ; No. 398. Charles C. McChord et ak, appellants, v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company; No. 399. Charles C. McChord et ah, appellants, v. The Southern Rail- way Company in Kentucky ; and No. 400. Charles C. McChord et ak, appellants, i\ The Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Company. Motion to advance submit- ted by Mr. D. W. Baird for the appellants. No. 438. Louis J. Gableman, jr., etc., plaintiff in error, v. Peoria, Decatur and Evansville Railway Company et ak Advanced as under the thirty-second rule on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney in behalf of counsel. No. 256 of 1899. The Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company, petitioner, v. Heman Clark. Motion to reform judgment submitted by Mr. Frederic D. McKenney in behalf of Mr. L. Laplin Kellogg, counsel for respondent, and by Mr. Burton Hanson for peti- tioner in opposition thereto. No. 226. Frank M. Fairbank, plaintiff in error, v. The United States. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. C. W. Bunn for the plaintiff in error. No. 154. John Schrimpscher et ak, plaintiffs in error, v. John S. Stockton et ak Death .of John S. Stockton suggested, and order of pub- lication awarded on motion of Mr. William M. Springer for the plaintiffs in error. No. 5, Original. The State of Missouri, complainant, v. The State of Illinois et ak Assigned for argument November 12, on motion of Mr. William M. Springer for the defendants. No. 293. George W. Reed, administrator, etc., et ak, petitioners, v. John A. Stanley, trustee, etc., et ak Leave granted to file exhibits to petition herein on motion of Mr. A. B. Browne for the petitioners, and to file counter affidavits on motion of Mr. William A. Maury for the respondents. 5 No. 7. Charles M. Cotting et al., appellants, v. A. A. Godard as attor- ney-general of the State of Kansas et al. Passed, to be restored to the call subject to the provisions of section 9 of rule 26, on morion of Mr. J. Hublev Ash ton in behalf of counsel. No. 18. Joseph Smith, plaintiff in error, v. the State of Tennessee. Submitted by Mr. J. M. Dickinson for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. G. W. Pickle for the defendant in error. No. 20. Fred Stearns, county auditor, etc., plaintiff in error, v. The State of Minnesota on the relation of James N. Marr. Passed tempo- rarily. No. 21. Josephine H. Throckmorton et al., plaintiffs in error, v. Washington D. Holt et al. Passed, to be restored to the call subject to the provisions of section 9, rule 26, on motion of Mr. William G. John- son for the plaintiffs in error. No. 22. R. M. Mauley, executor, etc., plaintiff in error, v. M. E. Larkin, sheriff, etc., et al. In error to the supreme court of the State of Kansas. Dismissed with costs on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error.