<<

Vol. XXXVI, No. 12 December, 2011

The Catholic Conscience and the Defense of Dr. Mudd By Lorle Porter (Concluded, from Vol. XXXVI, No. 11) And his adopted brother William T. Sherman was being puffed as a presidential candidate–the last thing either man needed was association with the political “hot potato” of the day. Prosecutors such as the posturing and violent Ohioan , were prepared to use their roles in the trial as political launching pads. Defense attorneys could look forward to nothing but vilification. Attempting to explain Ewing’s decision to join the defense, a 1980 television docudrama The Ordeal of Dr. Mudd, would depict a sequence in which General Ewing, walking down a Georgetown street, overheard a frantic Frances Mudd pleading with an attorney to defend her husband. The following scene showed Mrs. Mudd praying in a non- denominational church, only to be approached by General Ewing with an offer to help. Queried as to why a Union officer would undertake the case, Ewing Dr. Samuel Mudd merely quoted his grandfather’s admonition to follow (Libraryof Congress) an honorable path in life. The scene is fictional, if not In what would become the final month of totally implausible, given Ewing’s “lofty ideals.” the war, March, 1865, Tom Ewing went to However, if placed in a , the scene Washington to submit his military resignation to would have been credible, especially in a symbolic , a personal friend. His brother sense. At heart, Ewing undertook the case to defend Bub (Hugh Boyle) was back at Geisborough helping a man of his community. Frances Mudd, in turn, had to restore the Young family manor. He and his wife access to such prominent attorney as Ewing not “Ri” had been guests of their friend Tennessee through accident, but through the Catholic Senator Andy Johnson when Johnson took his oath professional and educational network.7“Through a as Vice-President. Bub had his hands full, but Tom priest friend,” Hugh “had gotten word” of Mudd’s was planning a political career.6 situation. The priest was likely Fr. Nicholas Young,

293 a friend both of Tom Sr. and Mudd’s father, Henry time John Mudd was at Georgetown. Ellen Ewing Lowe Mudd. Hugh first asked Orville Browning to herself had been a classmate of Dr. Mudd’s cousin head the defense, but Frances approached Tom Jr.8 Mary Mudd of Charles County, Maryland from The specifics of the Ewing-Mudd connection 1839-1841. Leda Gillespie and Emily Mudd, in can actually be reconstructed through letters, school turn, had both been enrolled in 1842 and it is apparent records and genealogies. On December 8, 1853, as well from Ellen’s letter that she and Emily were for example, Ellen Ewing Sherman had written her friends. Emily and John Mudd were second cousins mother from California: to the later infamous Dr. Samuel Mudd. Given the Mr. Mudd spent an evening with us numerous joint socials arranged between the male lately. He always talks to me a great deal about and female academies (with the hopes of marriage) Miss Cronin and between you and I (not and given the much closer relationships between wishing my suspicions to get abroad) I think families of similar roots in nineteenth century America, they are engaged and that if they were married it is more than reasonable to assume that these school she would soon become a Catholic. If you go contacts were retained in the Ewings’ collective to Washington Emily Mudd will see you and memories.9 tell you as much as she may know about it, if there is really anything in it. Mr. Mudd told me It was no accident, then, that on May 9, that he knows Judge Head, who is practicing 1865, with one day’s preparation, General Thomas law here and he has quite a sympathy for him. Ewing stood in a hostile courtroom, in a hysterical He says the Judge has a great affection for city, and defended–brilliantly, according to Father and often talks of him. contemporaries–a country doctor named Samuel On May 18, 1854, Ellen also had written that: Mudd. The atmosphere of the court was malevolent. Mr. Mudd left in the last mail Steamer The male defendants were shackled by ball and chain and as I told you I sent Minnie a dress by him. throughout the proceedings in defiance of Anglo- He spoke to Cump of Father’s kindness to his Saxon tradition and all were “held in constraint and Father and said he thought he would go to in pain, with their heads buried in a sort of sack, Lancaster before he left. devised to prevent their seeing.” The defense was The “Mr. Mudd” referred to was John Henry hobbled and badgered. , the Clay Mudd (1821-1866) of Washington, D.C., a Unionist senator from Maryland, “a man of character, graduate of Georgetown’s class of 1838, an attorney moral valor, and intellectual distinction,” was “so in San Francisco, and an active participant in Whig badly treated by the military commission that he had politics there. His father was Ignatius Mudd (1788- practically withdrawn from the case and was acting 1851) a Washington carpenter who had risen via only in an advisory capacity.” Bub drove Tom to patronage to become Commissioner of Public court daily through hostile crowds. Tom Sr. and Buildings (May 5, 1849) during the elder Thomas Browning interviewed potential witnesses. John Ewing’s tenure as Secretary of Interior. Ellen and Armour Bingham of , “in a violent manner as Cump Sherman personally knew John was his custom,” was a major presenter of the Mudd in California; he had been their guest both government’s case. One participant later wrote that because he was within the Catholic circle and the trial was “a barbarous disregard or rather because Ellen had gone to school with his sister, contempt for the settled barriers of legal inquiry.”10 Emily. Emily B. Mudd (1830-1894) had been Ewing challenged the constitutionality of the court. enrolled at Visitation in 1842, a school which The trial was being heard before a military the Ewing girls had attended whenever their father commission on the assertion that the murder of the had resided in Washington. Their neighbor Mary E. President–the commander in chief–was a military Garaghty had been the first of the Lancaster group crime. Ewing argued that no branch of government to attend; she had been a student during the same had authorized such a procedure and the trial was

294 not legally authorized. Nonetheless the trial began the triumphant entry of . and ended on a predictable note. Mrs. Surratt, David But when the General mounted the review platform Herald and Lewis Payne were sentenced to death he refused the proffered hand of Stanton (brother by . Samuel B. Arnold, Michael O’Laughlin ’s next door neighbor in the capital) and Dr. Mudd faced life at hard labor and Edward for having called his Lincolnesque surrender terms Spangler, Ewing’s other client, drew six years. Ewing to the Confederates traitorous. Sherman’s brother- was both lucky and skilled to secure life for his in-law must have carried similar principal client. Furthermore, in Allen Nevin’s words, feelings toward their fellow Ohioan who had, in his “his records and connections ensured that he (and view, orchestrated a trial which sent Samuel Mudd his client) would be treated with a respect greater” to prison for life.13 than the court felt towards his colleagues.11 Arguably, Despite the disappointing outcome of the Ewing’s sense of justice, his love for the principles trial, Ewing and friends continued to both console for which the martyred President stood and his sense the Mudd family and to press for the doctor’s . of patriotism were enough to place him in that Ewing corresponded frequently with Mudd’s wife, courtroom, but he was also defending his own special Frances “Frankie” Mudd, to bolster her spirits. Lt. tradition.12 Egbert Thompson, cousin Emily’s husband, visited On May 22, a month after the assassination, Mudd in prison at Ft. Jefferson, in the national colors replaced the black bunting on 1867. Father Nicholas Young lobbied former student Washington doorsteps. Two days later, the Army and war hero Philip Sheridan, under whose of the West marched in a spectacular Grand Military command Mudd’s prison fell, to intercede for better Parade down Pennsylvania Avenue. President treatment for the son of his “particular friend” Henry , Ellen Sherman, former Senator Lowe Mudd. Sheridan complied in turn, writing the Thomas Ewing, General Thomas Ewing II, Ulysses priest of his “love and reverence.”14 Simpson Grant, and Secretary of War The Lincoln murder trial eventually became stood among others on the reviewing stand to salute blurred within the titanic struggle for control of the

Prosecuting Attorney John A. Bingham of Ohio Defense Attorney Gen. Tom Ewing Jr. (Libraryof Congress) (Libraryof Congress)

295 Administration and of Reconstruction policy. decision you knew perfectly well that it would Stanton, survivor of the coordinated assassination consign you to private life and the vehement attempt, emerged as a principal opponent of Andrew denunciation of almost all your party friends.”17 Johnson’s lenient program. Stanton refused to During the remainder of Johnson’s term, surrender his office as Secretary of War. Radical former Senator Ewing, without portfolio but with great Republicans in the House easily impeached Johnson. influence, supported the President and a Ewing clique The drama turned to the Senate–which had to vote grew in the administration. Reverdy Johnson became to convict. minister to Great Britain and Hugh Boyle Ewing was The bad blood between Sherman and the named ambassador to the Hague. Orville Hickman Ewings and Edwin Stanton colored the trial. The Browning became Secretary of the Interior. After men saw Stanton’s refusal to surrender his office on the climatic firing of Stanton, General Ewing was President Johnson’s order as an attempt to subvert nominated for the post of Secretary of War, but the Constitution. Also Tom Sr.’s intimate familiarity confirmation hearings languished beneath the with Washington politics made him fear the possibility impeachment trial of the President.18 that if Johnson was removed from office, there being Before Johnson’s term ended, he no Vice-President, the ferocious Ben Wade, leader courageously pardoned the prisoner on Dry of the Radical Republicans, would assume the Tortugas, and on February 14, 1869, he personally presidency.15 delivered the pardon to Frankie Mudd. The legal The Ewings were Constitutionalists. The battle for Mudd’s freedom pursued by Thomas Ewing very fact that Bingham had (on Lincoln’s behalf) was over. The battle for Mudd family vindication, successfully withdrawn habeas corpus doomed any however, would continue for better than a century chance of a merciful reunion of the states. For the until July 27, 1979 when President trial of the President, the elder Ewing called on his answered that long ago hope in part by endorsing protégé and law partner, Ohio’s former Attorney the full pardon of Mudd and expressing regret for General, , to fill that office in the new the actions of the military commission.19 (Although President’s cabinet. Stanbery had been practicing the constant trans-generational campaign of the law in . The family connection was more Mudd family was able to secure this pardon, powerful: his late wife had been Maria Ewing’s cousin considerable doubt remains about the role of Dr. and foster sister. To him fell the task of defending Mudd in the scheme. It is likely to remain a Scotch an unpopular president in what was nothing less than verdict: not proven.) a kangaroo court.16 After Republicans assumed the Presidency, Bingham’s final summation of the charges Tom Jr.’s law firm represented many Southerns with against President Johnson lasted three days. The claims against Union forces. He did so because he Senate was under enormous pressure. The public was an implacable foe of the Radical Republicans galleries were raucous and threatening. Edgar (such as Bingham) who controlled Congress. Ewing Cowan, Republican Senator from Pennsylvania had won a settlement for Addie Cutts Douglas over the been Tom Ewing Sr.’s law partner and Edmund Ross, confiscation of cotton from her Arkansas plantation Senator from Kansas was Tom Jr.’s long time friend (and used the fee to invest in Arkansas cotton and former staff officer. The resolution on conviction farms).20 failed by one vote. Seven Republicans voted for Tom Sr. suffered a stroke while arguing acquittal. Because of his position alphabetically, before his beloved Supreme Court. He was moved Ross bore the brunt of the anger as he cast the to Lancaster where he died two years later (1871). decisive vote. Back home he was castigated as a In a rare move, the Court devoted several pages of creature of Tom Ewing Jr. Ewing later wrote his its journal to Ewing’s career. friend of his “preeminent courage in making that Tom Jr. returned to Lancaster as a leader of

296 Ohio’s Democratic Party. He was elected to resignation; it was still in his desk at the time of Congress twice (1876-78) and narrowly defeated the assassination. Major Harrison Hannams, (by 17,000 votes of a third party) in the bid to “General Thomas Ewing, Jr., Kansas State become the Greenback Democratic Governor of the Historical Society, Collection 12, (Topeka, state. (His friend Ross became a Democrat and Kansas) 1911-1912, 276-282. Military also failed in his bid for governor of Kansas in 1880.) Order of the Loyal Legion of the United Tom retired to Yonkers, and States: A Memorial for Thomas Ewing, successfully practiced law. Yet so much political tar (New York: April 1, 1896), Ewing Family remained from his association with the defense that Papers, The University of Notre Dame. The no reference to Ewing’s participation ever appeared fictionalization of the meeting between Ewing in his authorized biographies or obituaries. In fact, and Mrs. Mudd was verified for the author by Eleanor Sherman Fitch, the donor of the Ewing- the co-writer of The Ordeal of Dr. Mudd, Sherman Papers to the University of Notre Dame, Michael Berk, in a telephone conversation, June apparently denied such participation in a letter to 7, 1985. James C. Butler, author of a popular article on the 8) Smith, 254. Mudd Trial 254. Mudd trial. Miss Fitch’s position was 9) Ellen Sherman to Maria Ewing, December 8, understandable, apparently based on the absence 1853; May 8, 1854; Dr. Richard Mudd, The of correspondence in the letters or mention of the Mudd Family of the , (Saginaw, event in published accounts of her ancestor’s life. Michigan: privately printed n.d.), 474-478. During the trial itself, all of the family save sister Sissie Visitation Convent School Records, (Maria Theresa) had been in Washington and had Georgetown, D.C., supplied by Sister Mary had no need to correspond. The one surviving Leonard Whipple, Archivist. Visitation Prepa- reference to the Mudd trial in the personal papers ratory School was founded by however, gave hints as to the drama played out in Leonard Neale, president of Georgetown the Capital. In a letter to her father, Sissie had written, College in 1799. In addition to educating “I suppose now you will probably not come until daughters of the Catholic elite, the oper- after the Conspiracy trial has closed. I hope Tom’s ated a Saturday charity school for any young client may prove to be innocent.”21 That sad spring girl who wanted an education, including free of 1865 General Tom Ewing and his family had faced blacks and slaves, although this was illegal. a difficult situation. Their sense of honor and justice Visitation webpage. This school may well have had been forged out of a rich family religious tradition been Leda Gillespie’s inspiration for her secret which sustained them when they made the harder school for black children. choice. In so doing they helped to avert an even 10) Allan Nevins, The War for the Union: The more savage attack upon that tradition. Organized War to Victory 1864-1865, (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1971), 329- NOTES 335. Pitman, The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, xix,xxiii; William E. Doster, Lincoln 6) Ronald D. Smith, Thomas Ewing Jr., Frontier and Episodes of the Civil War, (New York: Lawyer and Civil War General (U. Missouri, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1915), 260, 261, 267, 2008), 254. 278. The only reference to the hiring of Ewing 7) “Thomas Ewing, General,” Dictionary of was a much later statement by Frances American Biography, III (New York: Charles “Frankie” Mudd. “I engaged General Ewing to Scribner’s sons). 237-238. Ewing submitted his defend my husband. He was not only a lawyer resignation in a private meeting with Lincoln in of ability, but had distinguished himself by late February. The president pigeonholed the bravery in the during the war. In

297 this case he proved himself not only a lawyer of Livingston family of New York. Smith Thomp- merit, but a true friend during my husband’s trial son had been Monroe’s Secretary of Navy and imprisonment. Whenever he saw the least (1818-1823) and a member of the United shadow of hope, he would write me nice States Supreme Court from 1823-1843. friendly and cheering letters, which I sometimes Senator Thomas Ewing practiced before that think must have kept me from despair.” Mudd, court every session from 1828 until his death in The Life of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd, 36-37. 1871. Richard Mudd, Genealogy, 474. Smith, 254. “Egbert Thompson,” Dictionary of American 11) Nevin, The War for the Union, 331. James Biography IX, 475-478, “Smith Thompson,” C. Butler, “Dr. Mudd and the Assassin,” The Ibid, 471-473. Samuel Mudd’s father, Henry Catholic Digest, (St. Paul, Minnesota, College Lowe Mudd, was a friend of Father Nicholas of St. Thomas, April, 1958), 60. Spangler’s Young, now stationed in Washington. Richard defense was paid by , owner of Mudd, Genealogy, 515-532; Mudd, The Life Ford’s Theater and a friend of Tom Ewing Sr. of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd, 190. Smith, 254. 15) Smith, 296. 12) A hint of Catholic concern during the trial can 16) Stanbery was Senator Ewing’s reliable friend. be seen in Frankie Mudd’s encounters in He had presented Bub to practice before the Ewing’s office: “on more than one occasion I U.S. Supreme Court and Tom Jr. to the Cincin- have met Mrs. Browing, wife of the Secretary nati Bar. Smith, 22, 28. Norris Schneider, of Interior, who told me that [General Lew] “Henry Stanbery,” Zanesville, Ohio Times Wallace [the President of the court] said Recorder, February 3, 1974. After the failure ‘somebody must suffer . . .” Mudd, The Life of of the impeachment bill, Stanbery was renomi- Dr. Samuel A. Mudd, 38. Mrs. Browning nated by Johnson as his Attorney General; the (Eliza Caldwell) was a Catholic. Her husband, Senate refused to confirm him. , a law colleague of 17) Thomas E. Ewing Jr. to Edmund Ross, July Senator Ewing since the 1840s, had recently 16, 1894. Thomas Ewing Jr. Papers, Kansas been appointed. Mrs. Browning apparently felt State Historical Society, Quoted in Smith. a common cause with Mrs. Mudd. “Orville 18) “Browning,” Dictionary of American Biog- Hickman Browning,” Dictionary of American raphy, II, 175-176. “Thomas Ewing Sr.,” Ibid, Biography, II 175-176. III, 237-238. Thomas Ewing, Jr.,” Ibid, 238- 13) Nina Brown Baker, Cyclone in Calico, 239. (Boston: Little Brown, 1952), 215-220. Kerr, 19) Mudd, Life of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd, 319. William Tecumseh Sherman, 77. , July 27, 1979. 14) Through the pattern of marriage and education 20) Smith, 274. outlined, Dr. Mudd had access to three power- 21) James C. Butler to Eleanor Sherman Fitch, ful families: Ewings, Thompson and Livingston. April 18, 1958; Maria Ewing Steele to Thomas He was not a simple country doctor who could Ewing, Sr., June 13, 1865, Ewing Family be lost in the shuffle. In 1854 Emily Mudd had Papers, The University of Notre Dame. Miss married Lt. Egbert Thompson, United States Fitch’s letter is not extant, but Butler’s reply Navy. Lt. Thompson visited Emily’s cousin in outlines his bibliography, chiefly Nettie Mudd. prison at Ft. Jefferson in 1867. Mudd, The “According to this volume, then, General Ewing Life of Dr. Samuel Mudd, quoting her father’s was Dr. Mudd’s lawyer… Nevertheless, the letter of July 14, 1867. Thompson was the point you make in your letter is interesting and I adopted son of his blood uncle Smith Thomp- wish to check into the matter further to make son and his wife, a member of the powerful absolutely certain.”

298 St. Mary Parish, Lancaster Baptismal Register, 1834-1843 (Continued, from Vol. XXXVI, No. 7)

1841, continued Margaret Fitzgerald, spouses; spons. Dennis Ausust 15, Feast of the Assumption B.V., George, Cunningham and Joanna his wife. Joshua M. son of Ambrose Spen? and Odense Keller, Young spouses; spons. Joseph & Catherine Shatzley. page 71 Same, Henry James, son of George Shetzley and Sept. 7, 1841, Mary, daughter of Patrick Cox and Frances Uhl; spons. Joseph Shatzley and Ann Fagus; spons. Thos. M’Keon and Bridget Phobe Uhl. Moran. J. M. Young Same, Sarah Frances, daughter of Michael Myers Oct. 3, Sara Elizabeth, daughter of George Bohrer and Margaret Fricker; spons. Frances Sanders. and Margaret Myers, spouses; spons. Susan Same, Magdalen, daughter of Sebastian Brossman Teresa Snyder. and Ursula overhald; spons. Landolin Brossmer Same, Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Fleheven and Isabella Feist. J. M. Young and Rosanna his wife; spons. John Davee and page 69 Anna M’Manamy. Aug. 15, Mary Cecilia, born Aug. 2 of the lawful Oct. 10, Daniel, son of Daniel Shanting? and marriage of John Garaghty and Rachel Clarke; Barbara Kiver?, spouses; Michael Strickfader spons. Mary Garaghty and Antoinette Hafer. Same, William, son of Lumen Baker and Sara Same, Anna, of John Wallis and Alicia Coony; Hart, spouses; spons. Susan Hart. spons. John Murphy and Ellen Murphy. J. M. Aug. 23, Lucy Agnes daughter of Richard J. Lilly Young and Margaret Agnes Hughes, spouses; spons. Oct. 17, Mary Joanna, daughter of William Augustine Lilly and Mary Redman. Cunningham and [blank] his wife; spons. John 26th, William son of Robert Campbell and Mary and Sara Roby. J. M. Young Doughton, spouses; spons. Jere & Mary page 72 Sullivan. Oct. 17, 1841, Rosanna, daughter of William Same, Robert, born of the same parents, whose M’Loghlen and Bridget his wife; spons. James sponsors were Bernard Kelly and Catherine Shannon and Sabina his wife. J. M. Young Sullivan. November 7, Eva, two years old, of the lawful Same, Margaret, daughter of Nicholas Lyle and marriage of Christian Hilstand and Rosina Mary Barrett; spons. James Reynolds and Biderem; spons. Leopold and Maximiliana Mary Ann M’Cullogh. Cost. J. M. Young page 70 Nov. 9 at Logan in Hocking County, Peter, son of Aug. 26, 1841, Mary, daughter of Edward Collins Rudolph Shertzle and Barbara his wife; spons. and Martha M’Goulrick; spons. Nicholas & James and Rosanna Shertzle. Mary Kyle. J. M. Young Same, Joseph, son of James and Rosanna Aug. 29, William, son of John Scanlan and Hanna Shertzle, spouses; spons. Joseph Kessler and OHearn; spons. Garrett Reeves and Ann Barbara Shertzle. Sullivan. Same, Margaret Elizabeth, daughter of James Same, Margaret, of Dennis Cunningham and M’Keever and Mary Lynch, spouses; spons. Joanna Fitzgerald; spons. Timothy Scanlan and William Doroney and Elizabeth Tolan. J. M. Mary Coakley. J. M. Young Young Sept. 5, Joanna, daughter of Timothy Scanlan and page 73

299 Nov. 12, 1841, at Tarlton, Pickaway County, Beery and Ann Jones; spons. Ruth Madlock. Michael, son of Michael Sweetman and Mary Josue M. Young Howard; spons. Patrick Sweeny and Frances page 76 Tuohy. Jan. 27 at Logan, Hocking County: Same, Mary, daughter of Patrick Cusack and Anthony, son of John Stakely and Catherine Stein, Bridget Heery, spouses; spons. Michael spouses; spons. Anthony and Ann Mary Coble Gennings and Mary Sweeny. Joseph, son of Gottlieb Oberst and Elizabeth Same, Mary, daughter of Michael Jennings and Runser, spouses; spons. James Stahly and Catherine Manly, spouses; spons. Owen Magdalen Runner? Jennings and Ann Sweeny. Benedict, son of Christian Kunkler and Ann Same, Joanna, daughter of Owen Jennings and Snyder, spouses; spons. Benedict? Kunkler Elizabeth Flanagan, spouses; spons. Patrick and Angela Wyland Flanagan and Ann Jennings. Mary, daughter of Nicholas Seibert and Catherine Same, Thomas, son of James Weir and Sara Fuchs, spouses; spons. William Seebert and Galvy, spouses; spons. Jeremiah Tuohy and Mary Beegle Bridget Cusack. J. M. Young Phillippina, daughter of Caspar Kels and Dec. 12, I supplied baptismal ceremonies for John Appolonia Fix, spouses; spons. Matthias Fisher Joseph, son of John Coonam and Mary and Phillippina Stahly Cunningham, spouses; spons. Patrick Meehan Margaret, daughter of Joseph Coble and Marga- and Catherine Stokes. J. M. Young ret Snyder, spouses; spons. Geo. Ucker and page 74 Lucretia Coble. Dec. 25, 1841, Mary Ann Magdalen, daughter of Catherine, daughter of Presley Frazer and Mary Samuel Crooks and his wife Harriet; spons. Judy, spouses; spons. Francis and Frances Mary Phelan. J. M. Young Judy. Josue M. Young In the Vigil of the Nativity, Ruth Regina Matlock, page 77 about thirty years old, lately converted from the Feb. 1, 1842, Martin, son of Joseph Shatzley and camp of the heretics. J. M. Young Catherine Wagner, spouses; spons. George 26th, I supplied ceremonies of for Shatzley and Ann Kahler. Rebecca Emily, little daughter of John Davy and Same, James, little son of Thomas Fricker and Emily Darsie, spouses; spons. John Murphy Mary Walker; spons. Joseph Shatzley and and Rebecca Miers. J. M. Young Mary Magdalen his sister. page 75 Same, Mary, daughter of Matthias Neuninger and 1842 Eva Kastner, spouses; spons. Joseph Shatzler Jan. 2, James, born Dec. 26 of the lawful marriage and Barbara his sister. Josue M. Young of James Quinn and Margaret McNamara, Jan. 31, conditionally, Dorothy Hunter, adult, spouses; spons. Patrick Fielding and Elizabeth lately converted from the camp of the heretics; Hamilton. Jos. M. Young spons. Maria Ewing. Josue M. Young Jan. 3, Edward Linus, son of William Bodenheimer and Mary Pough, spouses, born (To be continued) Nov. 29 of last year; spons. Mary Bodenheimer. Josue M. Young Jan. 13 at Winchester, Ann Elizabeth, daughter of Copyright 2011, Henry Wy? and Ann Develing; spons. Charles Catholic Record Society - Diocese of Columbus Develing and his wife. J. M. Young 197 E. Gay St., Columbus, Ohio 43215 Donald M. Schlegel, Editor Jan. 23, Margaret Ann, lawful daughter of Samuel 300