B Uh U · W M N Z H L V Ki Vill Tu N H T 19 11 – 29 12 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

B Uh U · W M N Z H L V Ki Vill Tu N H T 19 11 – 29 12 2019 was the second woman at the Bauhaus to be assigned such a high position in the assistant until 1932, when she opened her own textile workshop in Berlin. Th� Fr�u�nkl���� school’s hierarchy. She left the Bauhaus in late 1929 to work as an interior designer She successfully operated her business until 1936, when she was prevented from in Walter Gropius’s architecture studio. working because of her Jewish heritage. Otti Berger was killed at the Auschwitz B�uh�u� · W�m�n In 1930, after Mayer was forced to leave the school for his political views, the German concentration camp. architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe was named the Bauhaus’s third director, upon Another woman to hold a management position in the weaving workshop was Anni Exactly one hundred years ago, the Bauhaus – a new school with a focus on a recommendation from Gropius. In 1932, the school was forced to leave Dessau for Albers, who was a leading proponent of weaving as an artistic form of expression architecture and industrial design formed by the merger of the local art academy political reasons, and so Mies moved the Bauhaus (now as a private institution) to equal to painting and other traditionally recognized art forms. Annelise (Anni) Elsa and school of applied art – opened its doors in Weimar, Germany. The school’s first a provisional home in a former factory in Berlin-Steglitz. The following year, however, Frieda Fleischmann began studying at the Bauhaus in 1922, where she met her �z��h��l�v�ki� director, the architect Walter Gropius, aimed for “the union of all the arts under the the National Socialists closed down the school for good. husband Josef Albers, who was head of the school’s glass workshop. Anni Albers leadership of architecture and the renewed close relationship between arts and All in all, 462 women studied at all the Bauhaus locations – i.e., in Weimar, Dessau, had originally wanted to study glass, but she was prevented from doing so, and so crafts. Art and technology shall form a new unity. The ultimate goal of all artistic and Berlin. Many of them applied to the school thinking that they would be able to after the school’s move to Dessau she entered Gunta Stölzl’s weaving workshop. activity is the building.” He succeeded in hiring such representatives of avant- study architecture or design (glass, furniture, or metal design), but after completing In 1933, she and her husband emigrated to the USA, where she made her name as garde art as Johannes Itten, Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, Lyonel Feininger, and the preparatory courses led by Johannes Itten, most of them, in Weimar at least, a textile designer. She had a solo exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New László Moholy-Nagy. As Gropius proclaimed in the school’s official program and in were forced to transfer to the weaving workshop, which was known as the York in 1949, and in January 2019 a four-month-long retrospective of her work a speech given at its opening, the Bauhaus would follow modern teaching methods . Although this workshop was the school’s most productive and most ended at the Tate Modern in London. The main theme of the exhibition Bauhaus ∙ Women while offering equal access to education: “We accept for apprenticeship any person Frauenklasse successful, the low regard in which it was held by some of the male Bauhaus In 1932, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe made Lilly Reich the head of the weaving of untarnished reputation, regardless of gender or age, providing they be considered Czechoslovakia is the often tragic fate of female members is perfectly encapsulated by Oskar Schlemmer’s statement that “Where workshop and the building and interior design department at the Bauhaus, where sufficiently capable and educated by the master’s council. […] We shall make no there’s wool, you’ll women find, even if they weave to just pass the time.” she remained until the school’s closure by the Nazis in 1933. Reich had initially Bauhaus students associated with Czechoslovakia distinction between the fair sex and the strong sex; there shall be absolute equality From its founding until the school’s move to Dessau, the workshop’s crafts master apprenticed as a seamstress and in 1908 began working at Josef Hoffmann’s Wiener and their specific experiences as students of one of the but also complete parity of obligations – no concessions to the ladies; we are crafts- was Helene Börner. From 1920, the master of form was Georg Muche. With Werkstätte. Three years later, she returned to Germany, where she focused on people all when it comes to our work.” most progressive art schools of the early 20th century. Muche’s departure in 1927, Gunta Stölzl was named the workshop’s head, furniture and fashion design. She joined the German Werkbund in 1912 and became Women had received the right to vote – and to freely choose their subject of study – making her the first female member of the school’s council of masters. In her the first female member of its board in 1920. In 1924–1926, she worked for the Trade only a year earlier, with the founding of the Weimar Republic. And yet, the first teaching methods, Stölzl focused primarily on working with new textile materials Fair Office in Frankfurt am Main, where she made the life-changing acquaintance women to apply for the Bauhaus in 1919 had already completed their education and on the use of modern technologies that made it possible to reorient what of Ludwig Mies van der Rohe. Over the next several decades, they collaborated in the fields of teaching and applied art. Applicants for the 1919 summer semester had previously been a craft towards abstract industrial design. on architectural designs for numerous exhibitions and home interiors, including numbered 84 women versus 79 men. Startled at these figures and worried that such Gunta Stölzl was accepted to the Bauhaus in 1919 and spent the 1919–1920 Villa Tugendhat. In 1937, four years after the Bauhaus was forced to close by the a high number of female students might lower the school’s prestige, Gropius advised academic year attending Johannes Itten’s preparatory course and his workshop Nazis, Mies emigrated to the USA, where Reich joined him two years later. Following the master’s council to accept women only to the weaving and ceramics programs. for murals and glass painting. The next year, she studied in the , her return to Germany, she was drafted into Organization Todt. After the war, she In 1925, the Bauhaus moved from Weimar to the industrial town of Dessau, where Frauenklasse i.e., Itten and Börner’s weaving workshop. Stölzl and Marcel Breuer, who joined taught interior design, and until her death in 1947 she operated a studio in Berlin women were given greater opportunities. After Gropius’s departure in 1928, the the school in 1920, collaborated on the design of the “African Chair” – Breuer specializing in architecture, design, textiles, and fashion. school’s leadership passed to the more leftist and egalitarian Swiss architect did the frame and Stölzl the textile weave. In 1921–1922, she designed fabrics In the late 1980s, German art historian Magdalena Droste, whose specialization 19 11 – 29 12 Hannes Meyer, thanks to whom female students could study in other fields as well. for Walter Gropius’s Sommerfeld House. From 1921 to 1925, she attended Georg is the history of the Bauhaus, published , a book dedicated For instance, after László Moholy-Nagy left in 1928, the metal workshop was briefly Frauen im Design Muche’s weaving workshop while also studying new methods for dyeing and to the important position that female designers hold in the history of applied art. run by his favorite student Marianne Brandt. producing fabrics at the School of Textile Design in Krefeld. In 1924, she went to This was followed by numerous other projects that have helped to rehabilitate Marianne Liebe, who later married the Norwegian painter Erik Brandt and lived work at Itten’s newly established Ontos Weaving Workshop (Ontos Werkstätte) in the importance of the work done by the Bauhaus’s female graduates. In 1996, the www.tugendhat.eu with him in Oslo and Paris, had been inspired by the school’s first exhibition to 2019 Herrliberg on Lake Zurich. The following year, she returned to the Bauhaus as the MoMA organized an exhibition on the furniture and textile designer Lilly Reich, who apply as a student in 1923. She attended a preparatory course taught by Josef master of the weaving workshop, which she took over as its first female head after significantly influenced the look of several iconic works by architect Ludwig Mies Albers and Moholy-Nagy, and also studied the theory of forms and colors under Georg Muche’s departure in 1927. In 1928, she went on a study trip to Moscow. van der Rohe, with whom she shared a close personal and professional relationship. Klee and Kandinsky. But most important was her encounter with Moholy-Nagy, in In early August 1929, she married the Bauhaus student and later architect Arieh This exhibition, too, hopes to remember and highlight the role of Lilly Reich, who, whose metal workshop she created her asymmetrical designs for copper teapots. Sharon, and on 8 October of that year she gave birth to their daughter Yeal. according to Magdalena Droste, formed a “creative pair” with Mies van der Rohe. There followed a study trip to Paris, where she produced numerous collages In 1931, Stölzl left the Bauhaus because of political reasons and internal conflicts and photo-collages.
Recommended publications
  • National Ski Associations - Members of the FIS Council - Committee Chairmen
    To the - National Ski Associations - Members of the FIS Council - Committee Chairmen Oberhofen, 18th November, 1999 SL/er Re.: FIS Council Meeting 8th November, 1999 in Venice (ITA) Dear Mr. President, Dear Ski friends, In accordance with art. 32.2 of the FIS Statutes we take pleasure in sending you today A SHORT SUMMARY of the most important decisions of the FIS Council Meeting in Venice (ITA). We would also like to take this opportunity of informing you that this ‘Short Summary’ is available on the Member Services section of the FIS website to accredited users of the National Ski Association forum. 1. Members present The following Council Members were present at the Meeting in Venice, November 8th, 1999: President Gian-Franco Kasper, Vice-Presidents Anatolij Akentiev, Yoshiro Ito and Hank Tauber, Members Peter Andrews, Geoff Henke, Milan Jirasek, Janez Kocijancic, Arnold Koller, Pablo Rosenkjer, Odd Seim-Haugen, Carl Eric Stålberg, Carlo Valentino, Fritz Wagnerberger and Director Sarah Lewis. Excused: Esko Aho (replaced by Paavo Petäjä), Bernard Chevallier 2 2. Minutes from the Council Meeting in Portoroz The minutes from the Council Meeting in Portoroz (SLO) 12th May, 1999 were approved with a minor amendment. 3. The FIS World Ski Championships The Council acknowledged the reports on the preparations for the future FIS World Championships: · Ski Flying: 2000 Vikersund (NOR), 2002 Harrachov (CZE) · Nordic events: 2001 Lahti (FIN), 2003 Val di Fiemme (ITA) · Alpine events: 2001 St. Anton (AUT), 2003 St. Moritz (SUI) · Snowboard: 2001 Madonna di Campiglio (ITA) The Council appointed Milan Jirasek as its official delegate to the first FIS Rollerskiing World Championships in Rotterdam, 31st August – 3rd September 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Programme Commission Report
    OLYMPIC PROGRAMME COMMISSION REPORT 119 th IOC SESSION – JULY 2007 Published by the International Olympic Committee June 2007 Printing by Id-Média S.à r.l., Belmont-sur-Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND In November 2002, the IOC Session in Mexico City approved the principle of a systematic review of the Olympic Programme and mandated the Olympic Programme Commission to lead the process after each edition of the Olympic Games. EVALUATION CRITERIA In order to fulfil this mission, the Olympic Programme Commission developed a set of criteria to be used in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each sport and the value that each sport adds to the Olympic Programme. Following consultation with the International Federations (IFs) and other key stakeholders, the final list of 33 criteria was proposed to the IOC Session, which approved it in August 2004 in Athens. These criteria, which were approved by the Session in August 2004, were subsequently used by the IOC Session in Singapore in July 2005 to determine the programme for the 2012 Olympic Games in London. PROCESS REFINEMENT Following the revision of the 2012 Summer Olympic Programme, the present review will utilise the same list of 33 criteria by means of a questionnaire, adapted to the particularities of the Winter Games programme. DATA COLLECTION In April 2006, a questionnaire reflecting these criteria was sent to the seven Olympic Winter Federations. Completed questionnaires were returned by July 2006 to the IOC Sports Department, which then had the responsibility of verifying all responses and requesting further information or clarification where necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Tate Papers - Josef Albers, Eva Hesse, and the Imperative of Teaching
    Tate Papers - Josef Albers, Eva Hesse, and the Imperative of Teaching http://www.tate.org.uk/research/tateresearch/tatepapers/07spring/saletni... ISSN 1753-9854 TATE’S ONLINE RESEARCH JOURNAL Josef Albers, Eva Hesse, and the Imperative of Teaching Jeffrey Saletnik Fig.1 Eva Hesse No Title , 1970 Des Moines Art Center, purchased with funds from the Coffin Fine Arts Trust, Nathan Emery Coffin Collection 1988 © The Estate of Eva Hesse enlarge When one reflects upon the pedagogic practice of Josef Albers it is his colour instruction that likely first comes to mind. The former Bauhaus master’s 1963 publication Interaction of Color and its subsequent paperback editions have long been standard texts and the significance of his perception-based model of ‘color action’ in which visual relationships are developed rather than taken as given cannot be understated in terms of its importance both to art making and art instruction. Yet several of Albers’ students are known for their innovative use of material (like fibreglass and polyester resin in the case of Eva Hesse ) despite having been brilliant colourists in their own right.1 This seeming anomaly can be addressed, in part, by looking more deeply at the principles that underscored Albers’ teaching. For Albers, colour was in constant flux. In his instruction he emphasised its relativity as material and its role in creating visual relationships, especially those causing optical estrangement. But in doing so Albers taught his students more than the interaction of colour; he instilled in them a general approach to all material and means of engaging it in design.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions of Fashion
    http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/677870 . Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Bard Graduate Center are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to West 86th. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 185.16.163.10 on Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:24:53 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Questions of Fashion Lilly Reich Introduction by Robin Schuldenfrei Translated by Annika Fisher This article, titled “Modefragen,” was originally published in Die Form: Monatsschrift für gestaltende Arbeit, 1922. 102 West 86th V 21 N 1 This content downloaded from 185.16.163.10 on Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:24:53 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Introduction In “Questions of Fashion,” Lilly Reich (1885–1947) introduces readers of the journal Die Form to recent developments in the design of clothing with respect to problems of the age.1 Reich, who had her own long-established atelier in Berlin, succinctly contextualizes issues that were already mainstays for the Werkbund, the prominent alliance of designers, businessmen, and government figures committed to raising design standards in Germany, of which she was a member.
    [Show full text]
  • E in M Ag Azin Vo N
    Ein Magazin von T L 1 Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, im Jahr 2019 feiert Deutschland 100 Jahre Bauhaus und wir fast vier Jahrzehnte TEcnoLuMEn. 140 Jahre Tradition – eine Vergan - genheit voller Geschichten, die wir Ihnen erzählen wollen. Die Wagenfeld-Leuchte ist ohne Eine davon beginnt 1919 in Weimar. Zweifel eine dieser zeitlosen Walter Gropius gründete das Designikonen und seit fast 40 Jahren Staatliche Bauhaus, eine Schule, is t sie ganz sicher das bekannteste in der Kunst und Handwerk Werkstück unseres Hauses. auf einzigartige Weise zusammen - Das ist unsere Geschichte. geführt wurden. Interdisziplinär, Weshalb TEcnoLuMEn autorisierter weltoffen und experimentierfreudig. Hersteller dieser Leuchte ist, wer ob Architektur, Möbel, Foto- das Bremer unternehmen gegründet grafie, Silberwaren – Meister und hat, welche Designleuchten wir Studierende des Bauhaus schufen neben diesem und anderen Klassi - viele Klassiker. kern außerdem im Sortiment haben und welche Philosophie wir bei TEcnoLuMEn verfolgen, all das möchten wir Ihnen auf den folgen - den Seiten unseres Magazins erzählen. Weil Zukunft Vergangenes und Gegenwärtiges braucht. und das Heute ohne Geschichten nicht möglich ist. Wir freuen uns sehr, Ihnen die erste Ausgabe unseres TEcnoLuMEn Magazins TL1 vorstellen zu können 4 und wünschen Ihnen eine interes - Die Idee des Bauhaus sante und erkenntnisreiche Lektüre. 6 Die TEcnoLuMEn Geschichte carsten Hotzan 8 Interview mit Walter Schnepel Geschäftsführer 12 Alles Handarbeit 14 Designikone im Licht der Kunst 16 „Junge Designer“ r e n g e i l F m i h c a o J Die von Wilhelm Wagenfeld 1924 entworfene und im Staatlichen Bauhaus Weimar hergestellte Metallversion der „Bauhaus-Leuchte“. Herbert Bayer „Eine solche Resonanz kann man nicht Max Bill Laszlo Moholy-nagy mit organisation erreichen und nicht mit Propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Bauhaus 1919 - 1933: Workshops for Modernity the Museum of Modern Art, New York November 08, 2009-January 25, 2010
    Bauhaus 1919 - 1933: Workshops for Modernity The Museum of Modern Art, New York November 08, 2009-January 25, 2010 ANNI ALBERS German, 1899-1994; at Bauhaus 1922–31 Upholstery, drapery, and wall-covering samples 1923-29 Wool, rayon, cotton, linen, raffia, cellophane, and chenille Between 8 1/8 x 3 1/2" (20.6 x 8.9 cm) and 4 3/8 x 16" (11.1 x 40.6 cm) The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of the designer or Gift of Josef Albers ANNI ALBERS German, 1899-1994; at Bauhaus 1922–31 Wall hanging 1925 Silk, cotton, and acetate 57 1/8 x 36 1/4" (145 x 92 cm) Die Neue Sammlung - The International Design Museum Munich ANNI ALBERS German, 1899-1994; at Bauhaus 1922–31 Wall hanging 1925 Wool and silk 7' 8 7.8" x 37 3.4" (236 x 96 cm) Die Neue Sammlung - The International Design Museum Munich ANNI ALBERS German, 1899-1994; at Bauhaus 1922–31 Wall hanging 1926 Silk (three-ply weave) 70 3/8 x 46 3/8" (178.8 x 117.8 cm) Harvard Art Museum, Busch-Reisinger Museum. Association Fund Bauhaus 1919 - 1933: Workshops for Modernity - Exhibition Checklist 10/27/2009 Page 1 of 80 ANNI ALBERS German, 1899-1994; at Bauhaus 1922–31 Tablecloth Fabric Sample 1930 Mercerized cotton 23 3/8 x 28 1/2" (59.3 x 72.4 cm) Manufacturer: Deutsche Werkstaetten GmbH, Hellerau, Germany The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Purchase Fund JOSEF ALBERS German, 1888-1976; at Bauhaus 1920–33 Gitterbild I (Grid Picture I; also known as Scherbe ins Gitterbild [Glass fragments in grid picture]) c.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Earth and Judith Raum Exhibit at Bauhaus Dessau
    Bauhaus Dessau Design Earth and Judith Raum exhibit at Bauhaus Dessau Press release After a long Covid-19 break, the Bauhaus Dessau Foundation opens two exhibition projects in the context of the annual theme "Infrastructure" on Thursday, 24 June 2021: In the Intermezzo Design Earth. Climate Inher- itance at the Bauhaus Museum Dessau, the Design Earth team shows ten UNESCO World Heritage Sites as figures in the climate crisis. And under the title Textile territories, artist Judith Raum explores Otti Berger's textile works in her installations at the Bauhaus Museum Dessau and in the Bauhaus P r e s s c o n t a c t Building. Ute König P +49-340-6508-225 E x h i b i t i o n s [email protected] Bauhaus Dessau Foundation Design Earth. Climate Inheritance Gropiusallee 38 Intermezzo 06846 Dessau-Roßlau >> Bauhaus Museum Dessau Germany bauhaus-dessau.de 24 June – 3 Oct 2021 facebooK.com/bauhausdessau twitter.com/gropiusallee Corona has brought global tourism and its infrastructures to a near standstill. What has emerged is a moment that gives space for reflection: on ways to deal with the collective responsibility of inheriting a planet in climate crisis. El Dessau-Roßlau, Hadi Jazairy and Rania Ghosn of Design Earth look at ten UNESCO World 22 June 2021 Heritage Sites as figures in the climate crisis and try to concretely locate the abstract of climate change in these iconic places. The case studies show a broad spectrum of climate impacts: from rising sea levels to species extinc- tion and melting glaciers.
    [Show full text]
  • Anni Albers and Lilly Reich in Barcelona 1929: Weavings and Exhibition Spaces
    Laura Martínez de Guerenu˜ https://doi.org/10.3986/wocrea/1/momowo1.14 Anni Albers and Lilly Reich This paper examines the work of Anni Albers (1899–1994) to ascertain the impact that the visit to Barcelona International Exhibition during the summer of 1929 had on her later work. Albers was in Barcelona 1929: then a student of the Bauhaus weaving workshop and would graduate the following semester, in February 1930.1 Lilly Reich (1885–1947) would not join the Bauhaus until 1932.2 However, Reich’s Weavings and Exhibition Spaces work in the interior designs of the vast German exhibits in Barcelona 1929 is echoed in a building that was collectively designed by the various Bauhaus workshops under the directorship of Hannes Meyer (1889–1954), and in which Albers participated, also in 1929. Despite all that has been discussed in relation to the Barcelona International Exhibition, an important fact has remained undiscovered for scholarship in the fields of decorative arts, design history and material culture. In early 1929 the Bauhaus had already acquired many commitments to participate in several exhibitions throughout that year.3 Barcelona, together with Basel, Brussels, Leningrad The Bauhaus participated as an industry in the German section of the 1929 Barce- lona International Exhibition, sending objects to the Palaces of Textile Industries and Paris, was one of the many cities outside Germany, where the Bauhaus was planning to display and Decorative and Industrial Arts, two interiors (besides another thirteen) de- its objects. In fact, the Bauhaus participated as an industry in the German section of the 1929 signed by Lilly Reich and Mies van der Rohe.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlinische Galerie, Sprengel Museum Hannover and Bauhaus
    P R E S S E M I T T E I L U N G 22. April 2016 B A U Berlinische Galerie, H A Sprengel Museum Hannover U S and Bauhaus Dessau Foundation D purchase the artistic estate E S of the photographer UMBO S A U Press conference: 09.05.2016, 12:30 in the Berlinische Galerie The work of Otto Maximilian Umbehr (1902-1980), nicknamed UMBO, will now be preserved as a complete portfolio. Thanks to the generous assistance of fourteen patrons and sponsors, the estate of this famous photographer of the modernist period has recently been acquired from three different provenances by the Berlinische Galerie, the Sprengel Museum Hannover and the Bauhaus Dessau Foundation. The complex purchase deal was pushed forward with tirel- ess commitment by Galerie Kicken, Berlin, together with the artist's daugh- ter, Phyllis Umbehr, and her husband, Manfred Feith-Umbehr, as well as the German States Cultural Foundation (KSL). Generous assistance was given by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media, the Ernst von Siemens Art Foundation, and the German Lottery Foundation Berlin, among others. UMBO, The Racing Reporter, UMBO, Grock, 12, from the UMBO, Dreamers, 1928/29, Egon Erwin Kisch (1885- series "Clown Grock", 1928- Bauhaus Dessau Foundation, 1948), 1926, Berlinische 1929, Sprengel Museum © Phyllis Umbehr/Galerie Galerie, © Phyllis Um- Hannover, © Phyllis Umbehr/ Kicken Berlin/ VG Bild-Kunst, behr/Galerie Kicken Berlin/ Galerie Kicken Berlin/VG Bonn, 2016 VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn, 2016 Bild-Kunst, Bonn, 2016 UMBO's works are a substantial gain for the collections of the three muse- ums.
    [Show full text]
  • Leseprobe 9783791385280.Pdf
    Our Bauhaus Our Bauhaus Memories of Bauhaus People Edited by Magdalena Droste and Boris Friedewald PRESTEL Munich · London · New York 7 Preface 11 71 126 Bruno Adler Lotte Collein Walter Gropius Weimar in Those Days Photography The Idea of the at the Bauhaus Bauhaus: The Battle 16 for New Educational Josef Albers 76 Foundations Thirteen Years Howard at the Bauhaus Dearstyne 131 Mies van der Rohe’s Hans 22 Teaching at the Haffenrichter Alfred Arndt Bauhaus in Dessau Lothar Schreyer how i got to the and the Bauhaus bauhaus in weimar 83 Stage Walter Dexel 30 The Bauhaus 137 Herbert Bayer Style: a Myth Gustav Homage to Gropius Hassenpflug 89 A Look at the Bauhaus 33 Lydia Today Hannes Beckmann Driesch-Foucar Formative Years Memories of the 139 Beginnings of the Fritz Hesse 41 Dornburg Pottery Dessau Max Bill Workshop of the State and the Bauhaus the bauhaus must go on Bauhaus in Weimar, 1920–1923 145 43 Hubert Hoffmann Sándor Bortnyik 100 the revival of the Something T. Lux Feininger bauhaus after 1945 on the Bauhaus The Bauhaus: Evolution of an Idea 150 50 Hubert Hoffmann Marianne Brandt 117 the dessau and the Letter to the Max Gebhard moscow bauhaus Younger Generation Advertising (VKhUTEMAS) and Typography 55 at the Bauhaus 156 Hin Bredendieck Johannes Itten The Preliminary Course 121 How the Tremendous and Design Werner Graeff Influence of the The Bauhaus, Bauhaus Began 64 the De Stijl group Paul Citroen in Weimar, and the 160 Mazdaznan Constructivist Nina Kandinsky at the Bauhaus Congress of 1922 Interview 167 226 278 Felix Klee Hannes
    [Show full text]
  • Bauhaus World
    New Programs Our Highlight Program October 2018 Bauhaus world What do escalators in Medellín, Arabic lettering in Amman, story-telling furniture from London, ARTS urban farming in Detroit and a co-living complex in Tokyo have to do with the Bauhaus? The architect Walter Gropius founded the Bauhaus in Weimar in 1919. He brought together some VERSIONS of the most illustrious artists in Europe to create a school that would fuse the fine arts and the Arabic, German, English, Spanish (03 x 60 min. in HD) crafts. Together, they set out to fundamentally rethink the world and society. Although the Bau- 38 4902 | 01-03 haus school – which later relocated to Dessau and then to Berlin – only existed for a few years, it revolutionized ideas about the organization of modern life. In 2019, the Bauhaus will celebrate the 100th anniversary of its founding. To mark the occasion, planetfilm has produced a series of three documentaries for Deutsche Welle. The films focus on the influence that the philosophy of the Bauhaus movement still exerts on the globalized society of the 21st century. They also explore historical parallels between 1919 and the present day: Society is facing major upheavals and challenges, just as it did back then. We meet architects, urban planners, designers and artists from around the globe who, in the spirit of the Bauhaus, want to rethink and change the world. Tatiana Bilbao, for example, is a Mexican architect who has designed an 8,000-dollar house for the poorest members of society. The design- er Ahmed Humeid is working on plans to bring order to the traffic chaos of the Jordanian capital Amman.
    [Show full text]
  • Warping the Architectural Canon
    EXCERPT from “Thinking GENDER IN SPACE, PLACE, AND Dance,”TG 2012 PLENARY SESSION BY JAMIE ARON WARPING THE ARCHITECTURAL CANON EXTILES have long been a part of the manual skill rather than individual creativity intersected architecture at key moments in the canon of Western architecture—from the or intellectual drive. Eventually, through hard twentieth century, but also challenged the hier- Tfolds of draped female forms in ancient lobbying by Renaissance artists and humanists, archical position and cultural agency of architec- Greek temples to the abstract Mayan patterns the establishment of art academies dedicated ture. “knitted” together in Frank Lloyd Wright’s textile exclusively to the teaching of architecture, paint- In the early twentieth century, modern archi- block houses of the 1920s. Yet just as any façade ing and sculpture, and theoretical backing by tects and theorists reacted to broad social changes may conceal what’s inside, architecture’s shared Enlightenment philosophers, architecture sepa- brought about by Industrialization and social history with weaving is often obscured. Today rated from its mechanical compatriots to become and political upheaval by rejecting the historic architecture sits at the top alongside the “fine arts” one of the dominant “visual arts” of modernity, forms of the past. Partly due to theoretical build of painting and sculpture, while woven textiles leaving weaving behind as handicraft within the up from 19th century aesthetic debates on style occupy a less prominent position in the “applied” category of the “decorative arts.” It’s no secret that and the value of ornament, modern architects or the “decorative arts.” Appearing natural now, women have been generally left out of modern theorized that even textiles, considered inher- few remember that the hierarchy of the arts was visual art history and associated with the deco- ently ornamental within the interior, needed to be not always so stable.
    [Show full text]