DOCSLIB.ORG

Book of Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Book of Program 13TH ICAZ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2ND – 7TH SEPTEMBER 2018 ANKARA – TURKEY PROGRAMME A series of suggestions and drawings for the conference logo were submitted by METU, Ankara University and Hacettepe University students. After a vote by the members of the Scientific and Organizing Committee, the drawing proposed by Zeynep Ece Sahin was chosen. It encircles a number of bone "shadows" topped with the statue of a deer drawn after a metal find from the "Kings' tombs" at Alacahöyük. This statue is displayed at the Anatolian Civilizations Museum in Ankara. International Council for Archaeozoology Middle East Technical University CONTENTS COMMITTEES ....................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 GENERAL PROGRAMME .................................................................................................................... 7 ANKARA .............................................................................................................................................. 11 METU .................................................................................................................................................... 19 CULTURE AND CONVENTION CENTER FLOOR PLAN .............................................................. 20 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME ............................................................................................................... 21 3rd SEPTEMBER ............................................................................................................................... 22 4th SEPTEMBER ............................................................................................................................... 34 5th SEPTEMBER ............................................................................................................................... 46 6th SEPTEMBER ............................................................................................................................... 53 7th SEPTEMBER ............................................................................................................................... 63 EXCURSIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 74 COMMITTEES ICAZ Executive Committee (2014-2018) Lilian Karali, Greece Terry O’Connor, UK Angelos Hadjikoumis, UK Sarah Whitcher Kansa, USA Salima Ikram, Egypt Christine Lefèvre, France Daniella E. Bar-Yosef Mayer, Israel Pam Crabtree, USA Sebastian Munoz, Argentine Evangelia Pişkin, Turkey Hugo Yacobaccio, Argentine Luis Alberto Borrero, Argentina Luis Borrero, Argentine Hans Christian Küchelmann, Germany Canan Çakırlar, Holland Hitomi Hongo, Japan Levent Atici, USA Richard Meadow, USA Mehmet Özdoğan, Turkey Mariana Mondini, Argentina Mihriban Özbaşaran, Turkey Vedat Onar, Turkey Conference Scientific Committee Aliye Öztan, Turkey Hitomi Hongo, Japan Yilmaz Erdal, Turkey Melinda Zeder, USA Lutgarde Vandeput, Turkey Suzanne Pilaar Birch, USA Burcu Erciyas, Turkey Richard Meadow, USA Numan Tuna, Turkey Umberto Albarella, UK Inci Togan, Turkey Sebastian Payne, UK Gürcin Bertram, Turkey László Bartosiewicz, UK Can Yümni Gündem, Turkey Christine Lefèvre, France Marjan Mashkour, France Conference Organising Committee Jean-Denis Vigne, France Evangelia Piskin, METU, Settlement Archaeology Rémi Berthon, France Mustafa Tatbul, METU, Settlement Ann Belen Marin Arroyo, Spain Archaeology Simon Davis, Portugal Ezgi Sevimli, METU, Settlement Archaeology Alice Choyke, Hungary Mehmet Sömel, METU, Biology Arek Marciniack, Poland Füsun Özer, METU, Biology Luminita Bejenaru, Romania 5 ACKOWLEDGEMENTS We want to extend our thanks to the excavation directors Prof. Mihriban Özbaşaran, İstanbul University, Prof. Arkadiusz Marciniak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Prof. Aygül Süel, Ankara University and Prof. Andreas Schachner, German Archaeological Institute, for kindly hosting us and guiding us to the excavations of Aşıklı Höyük, Çatalhöyük, Şapinuva and Hattusha and Yazılıkaya. The excursions for ICAZ 2018 were organized voluntary by Prof. Aykut Misirligil, retired Professor of Ankara University. Special thanks are also due to Gamze Durdu, Gonca Özger and Burak Hüseyin Soy who spent many hours helping during the last few months of preparations. In addition, Onur Alp Uluçay offered his graphic design skills for all printed material and items in the conference pack. The book of Abstracts and Program were prepared by Evangelia Pişkin, Ezgi Sevimli, Gonca Özger and Gamze Durdu. The book covers were designed by İdil Ayçe Aba and İrem Dilek. The photograph on the cover pages was taken by Safoora Kamjan on a group of bones from Şapinuva and the one on inside pages by Mustafa Tatbul on materials from Komana excavation. The Conference management system was created and run by Arkeolab Consulting. Many thanks to all those who contributed. Assistants and Post-doctorates Burak Hüseyin Soy Dilek Koptekin Students Özcan Sütçü Gamze Durdu Gamze Tekçe Gonca Özger Emre Dalkılıç Iraz Aplay Damla Kaptan Kıvılcım Başak Vural Mustafa Özkan Ali Akbaba Erinç Yurtman Sevgi Yorulmaz 6 GENERAL PROGRAMME 31st August – 1st September Pre-conference excursion: Neolithic and Selcuk / Ottoman excursion 1st September Pre-conference excursion: Eskisehir: Iron Age Phrygian to Byzantine excursion 2nd September 16.00 – 19.00 Registration desk open at Culture and Convention Center 17.00 – 18.30 ICAZ Executive Committee meeting, Room H 19.00 – 22.00 Opening ceremony and cocktail, Kemal Kurdaş Hall at Culture and Convention Center 3rd September 09.00 – 09.20 Morning coffee/tea 09.30 – 17.00 Registration desk open at Culture and Convention Center 09.20 – 17.00 Parallel Sessions Raw Material Choice and Ornaments: Aesthetics, Availability, Social Value and Manufacturing Considerations, Room B Identifying and interpreting food taboos: a zooarchaeological approach, Room C Exploitation of animal resources in the prehistory of the South-East Europe, Room F Conservative, consistent and comparative: Papers in Zooarchaeology honoring Richard H. Meadow, Room A Animal Domestication and Biotic Exchange in East and Central Asia, Room D Archaeozoology beyond the bones: future and prospects of biomolecular and physico-chemical analyses, Room G GENERAL session, Europe and Southwest Asia, Room H 17.30 – 18.30 WG meetings Worked Bone Research WG Room H Fish Remains WG Room E Bird WG Room G 7 4th September 09.00 – 09.20 Morning coffee/tea 09.30 – 17.00 Registration desk open at Culture and Convention Center 09.20 – 17.00 Parallel Sessions Zooarchaeology in Turkey: contributions to understanding human-animal relationships at the crossroads of the Old World, Room A High-resolution analyses of dental remains: broadening horizons, Room D The diversity of exploitation and ritual use of animal in ancient East Asia, Room C Paleoecology of the Quaternary using Microvertebrate records, Room F Understanding cattle-human interactions: interdisciplinary approaches to an ancient relationship, Room B Excuse me, there is a hare in my soup, Room F GENERAL session, Medieval Europe and Americas, Room G 17.30 – 18.30 WG meetings Microvertebrate WG Room F PZAF Room G Zooarchaeology of the Roman Period WG Room H 19.30 – 23.00 Dinner, Vişnelik 5th September 09.00 – 9.20 Morning coffee/tea 09.30 – 13.00 Registration desk open at Culture and Convention Center 09.20 – 12.30 Parallel sessions Zooarchaeology in the Pacific, Room G Putting the humor back into zooarchaeology, Room D Mobile pastoralism through the interdisciplinary lens, Room F Bone refits in faunal analyses: Case studies and applications in archaeological assemblages, Room D Teeth: to know, to eat, to use, Room C GENERAL session, Dogs and Cats, Room F GENERAL session, Asia, Room G GENERAL session, Worked bone, Room C 8 13.00 – 14.00 WG meetings Archaeolmalacology WG: Room H Taphonomy WG: Room E Animal Palaeopathology WG: Room G ASWA WG: Room F 14.00 Half day excursion, Iron Age Phrygian 6th September 09.00 – 09.20 Morning coffee/tea 09.20 – 17.00 Parallel Sessions The archaeology of human impact on faunas: between historical and biological sciences, Room B Zooarchaeology for Global Challenges, Room D From Macroscopic to Molecular Methods and Techniques: A Discussion on Tools for the Study of Archaeofaunal Remains, Room C Commensal vertebrates as bioproxies for human processes, Room C Animal remains and built space – contribution to the taphonomy of buildings, Room B Teaching and outreach in zooarchaeology, Room A General session, Africa, Room G General session, Genetics, Room F General session, Fish, Room G General session, Methods, Room F 12.30 – 17.00 Exhibition of posters submitted for the “Poster Award”, at “Sergi Salonu” 17.55 – 20.00 ICAZ International Committee Meeting, Room C 7th September 09.00 – 09.20 Morning coffee/tea 09.30 – 17.00 Registration desk open at Culture and Convention Center 09.20 – 17.00 Parallel Sessions 9 Animal introduction, adaptation and exploitation around the Baltic and beyond, Room A Long term temporal trends in animal use, Room B Social Networks and Animal Ageing and Sexing, Room C Contextual Taphonomy in Theory and Practice, Room F Animal Health in Archaeology: Integrating Landscapes, Populations, and Individuals, Room G Zooarchaeology and stable isotope analysis in arid and semi-arid
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • From Left to Right, R. P. Soejono, H. R. Van Heekeren, and W. G. Solheim II Hendrik Robert Van Heekeren 1902-1974
    From left to right, R. P. Soejono, H. R. van Heekeren, and W. G. Solheim II Hendrik Robert van Heekeren 1902-1974 Received 29 September 1975 R. P. SOEJONO The friendly spirit and cooperation I found from scientists as well as from the simple peoples in small villages all over Indonesia will stay with me forever. (van Heekeren's Ceremonial Lecture Dr. H. C., University of Indonesia, 1970) R. H. R. van Heekeren passed away in Heemstede on 10 September 1974 after a four month's illness. His attendance at the "Symposium on Modern D Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia," which was held on 16 May 1974 in Groningen, was the last activity of his lifetime in the field of science. The paper he gave during this symposium dealt with problems ofthe chronology of Indonesian prehistory, which he always considered as being in its formative stage, with research on this subject continuously intensifying. His work of writing the second edition of his book The Bronze-Iron Age of Indonesia (first published in 1958), being done in cooperation with R. P. Soejono at the N.LA.S. (The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Wassenaar), has not yet been accomplished, in spite of his earnest desire to have the new edition published as quickly as possible. He fell ill upon his return from Groningen, making it impossible for him to continue his writing at the N.LA.S., and this illness ended with his death. It was not expected that he would pass away so soon and so suddenly, as a few days before his death he seemed to be improving and was looking forward to his next visit, the following year, to Indonesia, which he had always considered as his second homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Quarterly Reviews
    Education Quarterly Reviews OKUMUŞ, Osman, and VURGUN, Ahmet. (2021), Pre-Service History Teacher’s Opinions About the Use of Virtual Museum Applications in History Courses. In: Education Quarterly Reviews, Vol.4, No.2, 122-137 ISSN 2621-5799 DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.204 The online version of this article can be found at: https://www.asianinstituteofresearch.org/ Published by: The Asian Institute of Research The Education Quarterly Reviews is an Open Access publication. It May be read, copied, and distributed free of charge according to the conditions of the Creative ComMons Attribution 4.0 International license. The Asian Institute of Research Education Quarterly Reviews is a peer-reviewed International Journal. The journal covers scholarly articles in the fields of education, linguistics, literature, educational theory, research, and methodologies, curriculum, elementary and secondary education, higher education, foreign language education, teaching and learning, teacher education, education of special groups, and other fields of study related to education. As the journal is Open Access, it ensures high visibility and the increase of citations for all research articles published. The Education Quarterly Reviews aiMs to facilitate scholarly work on recent theoretical and practical aspects of education. The Asian Institute of Research Education Quarterly Reviews Vol.4, No.2, 2021: 122-137 ISSN 2621-5799 Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.204 Pre-Service History Teacher’s Opinions About the Use of Virtual Museum Applications in History Courses 1 2 OsMan OKUMUŞ , AhMet VURGUN 1 Asst. Prof. Dr., DepartMent of History, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Homo Floresiensis and Its Relation to Evolutionary Processes Under Isolation G.A
    ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE Vol. advpub No. 0, 000–000, 2008 The origin of Homo floresiensis and its relation to evolutionary processes under isolation G.A. LYRAS1, M.D. DERMITZAKIS1, A.A.E. Van der GEER1, S.B. Van der GEER2, J. De VOS3* 1Museum of Paleontology and Geology, Faculty of Geology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 15784, Greece 2Pulsar Physics, Eindhoven 5614 BD, the Netherlands 3National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, Leiden 2300 RA, the Netherlands Received 11 April 2008; accepted 20 May 2008 Abstract Since its first description in 2004, Homo floresiensis has been attributed to a species of its own, a descendant of H. erectus or another early hominid, a pathological form of H. sapiens, or a dwarfed H. sapiens related to the Neolithic inhabitants of Flores. In this contribution, we apply a geo- metric morphometric analysis to the skull of H. floresiensis (LB1) and compare it with skulls of normal H. sapiens, insular H. sapiens (Minatogawa Man and Neolithic skulls from Flores), pathological H. sa- piens (microcephalics), Asian H. erectus (Sangiran 17), H. habilis (KNM ER 1813), and Australop- ithecus africanus (Sts 5). Our analysis includes specimens that were highlighted by other authors to prove their conclusions. The geometric morphometric analysis separates H. floresiensis from all H. sa- piens, including the pathological and insular forms. It is not possible to separate H. floresiensis from H. erectus. Australopithecus falls separately from all other skulls. The Neolithic skulls from Flores fall within the range of modern humans and are not related to LB1. The microcephalic skulls fall within the range of modern humans, as well as the skulls of the Neolithic small people of Flores.
    [Show full text]
  • The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration
    guo namuuiy B/121188 The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration General Editor Immanuel Ness Volume V Rem-Z )WILEY~BLACKWELL A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication Contents Volume I Contents to Volume I: Prehistory IX Lexicon xiii Notes on Contributors xlvii Introduction cxxvi Acknowledgments cxxxii Abbreviations cxxxv Maps cxxxvii Prehistory Part I: The Peopling of the World during the Pleistocene 7 Part II: Holocene migrations 11 Volume II Global Human Migration A—Cro 417-1122 Volume III Global Human Migration Cru-Ind 1123-1810 Volume IV Global Human Migration Ind-Rem 1811-2550 Volume V Global Human Migration Rem-Z 2551-3180 Index to Volume I: Prehistory 3181 Index to Volumes II-V 3197 3182 INDEX TO VOLUME I: PREHISTORY Anatolia (confd) Arawak culture, 379-80, 394, 397 Ice Age land bridge, 327 Mesolithic, 143^4 language, 87, 89, 93, 384, 385, language families, 87, 328 migrations into Europe, 141—4 386-7, 392, 396-7 linguistic history, 327-32 see also Anatolia Hypothesis origin, 379 lithic technologies, 44-5, 58 Neolithic culture, 139-40, 141, society, 397 megafauna, 56—7 142, 143-4 speakers, 376, 378, 379-80 migrations within, 57 pottery, 143 spread, 380, 386-7, 398 modern populations, 254 see also Turkey archaeological evidence, 32, 293 Northern Territories, 330 Anatolia Hypothesis, 92, 161, 163, cultural changes, 40-6, 108-9 Pleistocene, 327 169,170-1 paucity, 14, 104, 112 Western Desert, 330 Ancient Egypt and radiocarbon dating see see also Tasmania archaeological sites, 135—6, under radiocarbon dating Australo-Melanesians, 220
    [Show full text]
  • International Student Guide Book Context
    INTERNATIONAL STUDENT GUIDE BOOK CONTEXT 1. Foreword of the Rector………………..………………………………... 2 2. Republic of Turkey……………………………………………………….. 3 3. Ankara………………………………………………………………………. 4 4. Ankara University ………………………………………………………… 6 5. The Social Life in Ankara University ……………….………………… 9 6. International Student Health System and Hospitals ……………… 12 7. The Climate of Ankara……………………………………………………. 13 8. Restaurants, Shopping and Entertainment in Ankara…………….. 13 9. Touristic Places to See in and Around Ankara……………………… 18 10. The Historical Places in Ankara ……………………………………….. 21 11. Living Cost in Ankara…………………………………………………….. 23 12. Transportation……………………………………………………………… 24 13. Ankara University Campus Map …………………..……………………. 27 14. The National and Religious Holidays in Turkey……………………… 28 15. Currency – Turkish Lira…………………………………………………… 28 16. Requirements for Student Visa in Turkey ….…..……………………… 28 17. Student Residential Permit ………………………………………………. 30 18. Accommodation ……………………………………………………………. 32 19. Libraries in Ankara ………………………………………………………… 34 20. Adaptation Period …………………………………………………………. 37 21. Ankara University Programmes ………………………………………….. 38 22. International Programmes……………….............................................. 44 23. Phone Guide ……………………..………………………………………… 48 24. Turkish Language …………………………………………………………. 49 25. General Information for Bachelor Degree Programmes……………. 51 26. General Information for Master and PhD Degree Programmes……. 53 27. International Student Office………………............................................ 54 28. Erasmus
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Prehistoric Research in Indonesia to 1950
    The History of Prehistoric Research in Indonesia to 1950 Received 16 January 1968 R. P. SOE]ONO INTRODUCTION HE oldest description of material valuable for prehistoric recording in future times was given by G. E. Rumphius at the beginning of the eighteenth century. Rum­ T phius mentioned the veneration of historical objects by local peoples, and even now survivals of the very remote past retain their respect. On several islands we also notice a continuation of prehistoric traditions and art. Specific prehistoric relics, like many other archaeological remains, are holy to most of the inhabitants because of their quaint, uncommon shapes. As a result, myths are frequently created around these objects. An investigator is not permitted to inspect the bronze kettle­ drum kept in a temple at Pedjeng (Bali) and he must respect the people's devout feelings when he attempts to observe megalithic relics in the Pasemah Plateau (South Sumatra); these facts accentuate the persistence oflocal veneration even today. In spite of the veneration of particular objects, which in turn favors their preservation, many other relics have been lost or destroyed through digging or looting by treasure hunters or other exploiters seeking economic gain. Moreover, unqualified excavators have com­ pounded the problem. P. V. van Stein Callenfels, originally a specialist in Hindu-Indonesian archaeology, be­ came strongly aware of neglect in the field of prehistoric archaeology, and he took steps to begin systematic research. During his visit to kitchen middens in East Sumatra during a tour of inspection in 1920 for the Archaeological Service, he met with the digging of shell heaps for shell for limekilns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Museum Quarter …………………
    䄀一䬀䄀刀䄀 匀伀匀夀䄀䰀 䈀、䰀、䴀䰀䔀刀 一、嘀䔀刀匀、吀䔀匀、 The䴀 MUSEUM娀䔀䰀䔀刀 䄀QUARTER嘀䰀唀匀唀 眀眀眀⸀愀猀戀甀⸀攀搀甀⸀琀爀 洀攀琀 䴀攀礀搀愀渀㄁ 一漀㨀㈀ 唀氀甀猀⼀䄀一䬀䄀刀䄀ﰀ欀ﰀ䠀 吀攀氀㨀 ㌀㄀㈀ 㔀㤀㘀 㐀㐀 㐀㐀 䄀一䬀䄀刀䄀 ㈀ ㄀㠀 Contents Preface ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………................................................................................. 2 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………...........................................................................……….. 3 The Former Prime Ministry and Finance Ministry Building ……………......................................…………………. 4 The Former Sümerbank Building …………………………………………………………….........................................................………… 4 The Revenue Office Building ………………………………………………………….............................................................…………………. 4 The Museum and Exhibition Areas ………………………………………….........................................................……………………….. 7 The Treasury Vault Museum ……………………………………………………................................................................………………….…... 8 The Museum of the Early Republic Era Painting ……………..............................................…………………….….……….. 9 The Museum of the Public Enterprises ………………………………….....................................................…………………….….. 10 The Democracy and Adnan Menderes Museum …………………............................................………………………..…. 11 The İskilipli Atıf Hoca Museum ………………………………………………………………...........................................................…….….. 12 The Museum of the İstiklal Mahkemeleri (the Independence Tribunals) ………...........................…
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia
    World Heritage papers41 HEADWORLD HERITAGES 4 Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia VOLUME I In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations [ Cultural Organization Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia Nuria Sanz, Editor General Coordinator of HEADS Programme on Human Evolution HEADS 4 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100107-9 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover Photos: Top: Hohle Fels excavation. © Harry Vetter bottom (from left to right): Petroglyphs from Sikachi-Alyan rock art site.
    [Show full text]
  • Osmanlı'dan Günümüze Türkiye'de Müzeler
    Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 14, 2009, 315-333 Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Türkiye’de Müzeler Halit ÇAL* AVRUPA’NIN Osmanlı Devleti’ni tasfiye planının öncüsü olarak uygulanan oryantalizm hareketinin temellerinden birini de arkeoloji ve kazılar oluştur- muştur. Avrupa devletlerinin bu konudaki talepleri ve Osmanlı Devleti’nin buna karşı koymaya çalışması son derece ilgi çekici ve ibret alınması gereken bir süreçtir. Konunun yayınlarda ele alınışına bağlı olarak önce müzeciliğin dünyada nasıl ortaya çıktığına değineceğiz. Müze Kavramı ve Dünyada Müzeciliğin Başlaması Günümüzdeki anlam ve işleviyle müzeciliğin dünyada ne zaman başladığı konusunda değişik görüşler ileri sürülmüştür. Türkiye’de ilgili yayınlar bazıla- rı çelişkili, yetersiz bilgiler tekrarlanıp durmuştur. Yunan mitolojisindeki her biri güzel sanat dallarının koruyucusu olan, tanrı Zeus’un dokuz kızının ortak adı olan mousa kelimesinden geldiği, Atina’daki bir tepeye veya tepedeki bir odaya müze denildiği, Helenistik dönemde İskenderiye, Bergama, Antakya, Roma’da içinde kütüphaneler ve kıymetli eşyalar olan müzeler kurulduğu belirtilmiştir. Bu bilgilere doğrudan atıf da yapılmadığı için karmaşanın ana kaynaklardaki bilgi azlığından mı yoksa yorumların yetersizliğinden mi kay- naklandığını bilmiyoruz. Bu müzelerde toplanılan kıymetli eserlerin neler olduğu, kıymetlerinin madenlerinden dolayı mı yoksa işlevlerinden mi kay- naklandığı, bunların hangi amaçla buralara konulduğu açıklanmamıştır. Aynı şekilde eski Türk devletlerinde yöneticilerin bu tür eserleri biriktirdikleri ko- nusu da belgelere dayandırılmamıştır. Devlet kurabilmiş toplumlar dönemin- den itibaren eski Mısır, Asur gibi devletlerde ganimetlerin saraylarda korun- maları müzeciliğin ilk uygulamaları olarak yorumlanmıştır. Roma’da koleksi- yonculuğun asiller arasında yaygınlaşması, bazı heykellerin halkın ziyaretine açıldığı bilgisinin ardından bu uygulamanın Ortaçağ’da da sürdüğü ifade edi- * Prof. Dr., Gazi Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sanat Tarihi Bölümü Öğretim Üyesi.
    [Show full text]
  • The View of Ankara in Memory of Prof
    Conference The View of Ankara In Memory of Prof. Dr. Semavi Eyice Program October 18, 2018 Rahmi M. Koç Museum Ankara, Conference Room 16:00 - 16:15 Opening Speeches Mine Sofuoğlu, Rahmi M. Koç Museum Ankara, Museum Administrator & Curator Prof. Dr. Filiz Yenişehirlioğlu, Koç University, VEKAM Director Erik Weststrate, Deputy Head of Mission, Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Turkey 16:15 - 18:30 Moderator Prof. Dr. Günsel Renda 16:15- 16:50 Some thoughts on the history and possible first owner of ‘The view of Ankara’. Eveline Sint Nicolaas, Curator of History, Rijksmuseum Amsterdam 16:50 - 17:00 Q&A and Discussion 17:00 - 17:15 Coffee Break 17:15 - 17:45 Ankara and its Mohair Industry as Reflected in ‘The View of Ankara’ of the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam Erman Tamur, Researcher, Author 17:45 - 18:15 View of Ankara: The Story of a Painting Dr. Feyza Akder, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow 18:15 - 18:30 Q&A and Discussion 18:30 - 18:45 Exploring ‘The View of Ankara’ on Display 18:45 - 20:00 Reception at Divan Çukurhan Foreword ‘The View of Ankara’ from the Rijksmuseum collection has been one of the key paintings regarded as a historical document revealing the 18th century Ankara’s topography and the mohair production since the 1970’s. It has gained attention with the contribution of Prof. Dr. Semavi Eyice who described the painting as “a view of Ankara” rather than the view of the city of Aleppo which was described as such before his study of the painting. The View of Ankara is not only important for Ankara studies as being the oldest painting of Ankara that is known but also it depicts various stages of mohair manufacture and the Angora goats being shorn on the foreground and points to the mohair trade which had been central to the economy of the city of Ankara.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara City of Treasured Archaeological Sites
    2012-07-28 Soraya Othman Ankara City of Treasured Archaeological Sites “If you are not conservative, then you cannot be a conservationist,” was a phrase quoted by Prof. Baykan Günay from Middle East Technical University (METU) in a special plenary session held during The 26th Annual Congress – AESOP 2012, which I have attended in mid of July 2012. His presentation about The Spatial History of Ankara was remarkable and provided me with an in-depth understanding about the richness of historic structures in Ankara from a variety of empires such as Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman. As a guide to the process of exploring the approaches of conservation, I decided to visit some significant archaeological heritages. The Citadel area and old bazaars marked the beginning of my journey, where I discovered a couple of souvenir shops at the entrance of the Ankara Castle. As I walked further, it led me the inner area of the castle where it is filled with art galleries, restaurants, old houses with lively community and the valuable 12th century Alaaddin Mosque. The mosque recorded the Seljuk art and wood craftsmanship, but its characteristics have been altered due to the restorations by the Ottomans. Knowing that in the past, Ankara used to function as an important commercial center during the Roman period, I was not surprised to find some Roman stones with inscriptions on some of the buildings’ walls. Later that day, I visited the remains of Roman Theatre, followed by a visit to the amazing Temple of Augustus and Rome (built between 25 BC – 20 BC) which is situated beside the 15th century Haci Bayram Mosque.
    [Show full text]