DOCSLIB.ORG

INDIA-IRAN RELATIONS Political Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INDIA-IRAN RELATIONS Political Relations INDIA-IRAN RELATIONS Political Relations: India - Iran relations span centuries marked by meaningful interactions. The two countries shared a border till 1947 and share several common features in their language, culture and traditions. Both South Asia and the Persian Gulf have strong commercial, energy, cultural and people-to-people links. Independent India and Iran established diplomatic links on 15 March 1950. In addition to the Embassy in Tehran, India currently has two Consulates in Iran - Bandar Abbas and Zahedan. The Shah of Iran visited India in February/March 1956 and Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru visited Iran in September 1959. Prime Minister Smt. Indira Gandhi visited Iran in April 1974 and Prime Minister Shri Morarji Desai visited in June 1977. The Shah, in turn, visited India in February 1978. The Iranian Revolution in 1979 introduced a new phase of engagement between India and Iran marked by exchange of high level visits of Indian Prime Minister Shri Narasimha Rao in September 1993, Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani in April 1995 and Indian Vice President Shri K. R. Narayanan in October 1996. The trend was consolidated and enhanced at the turn of the millennium with visits by Prime Minister Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee in 2001 and a return visit by President Mohammad Khatami in 2003, when he was also the Chief Guest at the Republic Day function. The Iranian President Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visited India on 29 April 2008. Indian Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh visited Iran from 28 – 31 August 2012 to attend 16th NAM Summit. During the visit Prime Minister held bilateral meetings with Supreme Leader of Iran and President Dr. Ahmadinejad. The two countries have in place several bilateral consultative mechanisms at various levels which meet regularly. Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki led a high-level delegation to India in November 2009. External Affairs Minister Shri S.M. Krishna visited Tehran in May 2010 to attend the 14th G-15 Summit. He called on President Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Majlis Speaker Dr. Ali Larijani and met Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki. In November 2010, Minister of State for Human Resource Development Dr. D. Purandeswari visited Tehran to attend the 9th Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD) Ministerial meeting. In March 2011, Shri Gulam Nabi Azad, Union Minister of Health & Family Welfare visited Iran to represent Prime Minister of India at the Second World Nowruz Festival held in Tehran. During his visit, Shri Azad called on President Ahmadinejad. On the sidelines of the celebrations, he met Vice President Hamid Baghai, Foreign Minister Dr. Ali Akbar Salehi, Energy Minister Majid Namjoo and Heads of delegations from other countries. On 26 September 2011 Finance Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee met Iranian Minister of Finance and Economic Affairs Dr Shamseddin Hossein on the sidelines of the IMF/World Bank meeting in Washington. Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh met President Ahmadinejad on September 23, 2011 on the sidelines of UNGA in New York. In October 2011 Minister for Parliamentary Affairs and Water resources Shri Pawan Kumar Bansal visited Tehran to participate at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the International Executive Committee (IEC) and 21st ICID congress on Irrigation and drainage. In March 2012 Minister of New and Renewable Energy Dr. Farooq Abdullah visited Iran on the invitation of Minister of Energy Dr. Namjoo. He was accompanied by a business delegation. In October 2012 Energy Minister Namjoo visited India and met with New and Renewable Energy Minister Dr. Farooq Abdullah, Minister of Water Resources Shri Pawan Kumar Bansal and Minister of Power Shri Veerappa Moily. In November 2011 Hon’ble Speaker of Lok Sabha Smt. Meira Kumar paid an official visit to Iran leading a multi-party Parliamentary delegation on the invitation of Majlis Speaker Dr. Ali Larijani. She inaugurated a tableau of Gurudev Rabindranath’s poem on Iran in the Majlis museum and a bust of Acharya J. C. Bose at Pardis Technology Park near Tehran. She also called on President Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Speaker of Majlis Dr. Larijani has been invited to visit India. India and Iran hold regular security consultations at the level of National Security Adviser/Secretary of Supreme National Security Council. The National Security Advisor Shri S. Menon visited Iran in March 2011 and called on President Ahmadinejad, Foreign Minister Dr. Salehi, Speaker Larijani and held meeting with his counterpart Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran Dr. Jalili. Dr. Ali Bagheri, Deputy to the Secretary, Supreme National Security Council visited India in June 2011. NSA Shri S. Menon met Secretary of SNSC Dr. Jalili on August 30, 2012 during his visit to Tehran accompanying the Prime Minister for the NAM Summit. Deputy National Security Advisor Ms. Latha Reddy visited Iran in March 2012 and held discussions with her counterpart Dr. Ali Bagheri. She called on the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Dr. Jalili and Deputy Foreign Minister Dr. Araghchi. Foreign Offices of both countries also hold regular consultations on bilateral and regional issues. Foreign Secretary of India Smt. Nirupama Rao visited Tehran in July 2011 for the 9th round of Foreign Office Consultations at the invitation of her counterpart, Dr. Mohammad Ali Fathollahi, Deputy Foreign Minister for Asia & Oceania Affairs. Besides holding the Foreign Office Consultations, she called on Foreign Minister Dr. Ali Akbar Salehi and Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Dr. Saeed Jalili. During the meetings views were exchanged on combating global terrorism, energy security, North South Transport Corridor, developments in Afghanistan and regional security and stability. During the visit, both sides exchanged the Instrument of Ratification for the Agreement on Transfer of Sentenced Prisoners signed in July 2010 thereby operationalizing the Agreement. Deputy Foreign Minister Dr. Sayed Abbas Aragchi visited New Delhi for the 10th round of Foreign Office Consultation in October 2012. Iran’s Vice-President, Mohammed Jawad Mohammadizade attended International Biodiversity conference in Hyderabad on 18th October, 2012. From the Iranian side Senior Advisor to Supreme Leader on International Affairs and Former Foreign Minister Dr. Ali Akbar Velayati visited India in December 2011. He called on Vice President and Prime Minister of India. Deputy Foreign Minister Mehdi Akhoundzadeh visited India to participate in the 11th IOR-ARC Council of Ministers meeting in November 2011. Iranian Foreign Minister Dr. Ali Akbar Salehi visited India on May 31 – June 01, 2012 and called on Hon’ble Prime Minister and met External Affairs Minister Shri S.M. Krishna and handed over letter from President Ahmadinejad inviting Hon’ble Prime Minister to attend the NAM Summit 2012 in Tehran from 26-31 August 2012. Prime Minister attended the Summit accompanied by EAM Shri S.M. Krishna, NSA Shri Shivshankar Menon and Foreign Secretary Shri Ranjan Mathai. During the visit Prime Minister held bilateral meetings with the Supreme Leader and President Ahmadinejad. Economic Relations: India-Iran economic and commercial ties have traditionally been buoyed by Indian import of Iranian crude oil. India-Iran trade in 2010-11 was US$ 13.4 billion (Indian exports US$ 2.5 billion and imports US$ 10.9 billion). India’s exports to Iran include rice, machinery & instruments, metals, primary and semi finished iron & steel, drugs/pharmaceuticals & fine chemicals, processed minerals, manmade yarn & fabrics, tea, organic/inorganic/agro chemicals, rubber manufactured products, etc. India and Iran hold regular bilateral talks on economic and trade issues at the India-Iran Joint Commission Meeting (JCM). The 16th JCM was held in New Delhi on July 8-9, 2010. It was co-chaired by Iran’s Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance Dr. Seyed Shamseddin Hosseini and India’s External Affairs Minister Shri S.M. Krishna. During the visit, Dr. Hosseini called on Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and met Minister of Finance Shri Pranab Mukherjee, and NSA Shri Shivshankar Menon. Dr. Shamseddin Hosseini again visited India on 25 February 2011 during which he called on Prime Minister, Finance Minister and External Affairs Minister. The 17th JCM will be held in Tehran on 19-20 November 2012 at the level of Foreign Ministers. Under the JCM mechanism, meetings of various Joint Working Groups have been held regularly. During the 16th JCM, 6 MoUs/agreements were signed: (i) Air Services Agreement; (ii) Agreement on Transfer of Sentenced Persons; (iii) MoU on Cooperation in New & Renewable Energy; (iv) MoU on Cooperation in Small Scale Industry between National Small Industries Corporation (NSIC) and Iranian Small Industries and Industrial Parks Organisation (ISIPO); (v) Programme of Cooperation on Science & Technology and (vi) MoU on Cooperation between Central Pulp and Paper Research Institute of India (CPPRI) and Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources (GUASNR). Trends in India-Iran Bilateral Trade (figures in Million US$) are as follows: (Figures in US$ Million) Year Exports from Imports by Trade Total Growth India India Balance Bilateral Rate (%) Trade 2005-2006 1188.35 4822.65 -3634.30 6011.00 43.70 2006-2007 1446.48 7818.55 -6372.07 9065.03 379.43 2007-2008 1943.92 10943.61 -8999.69 12887.53 42.17 2008-2009 2534.01 12376.77 -9842.76 14910.78 15.70 2009-2010 1853.17 11540.85 -9687.68 13394.02 -10.17 2010-2011 2492.95 10928.21 -8435.26 13421.16 0.20 2011-2012 2398.96 13540.80 -11141.8 15939.76 18.76 Source: Ministry of Commerce, GOI There has been regular exchange of business delegations from both sides. A 74 member FIEO business delegation visited Iran in March 2012. The delegation comprising of representatives of Indian companies active in Agriculture, Pharma and Automobile sectors among others had fruitful meetings with their counterparts at (i) Iran Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines, (ii) Tehran Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines, (iii) Tabriz Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines and (iv) Isfahan Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Japan-Iran Relations Japan-Iran Relations June 2009
    1. Japan-Iran Relations Japan-Iran Relations June 2009 (1) Japan-Iran Political Relations • Japan highly values its relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran in view of a stable supply of crude oil and ensure stability in the Middle East. • Based on friendly relations, Japan has conveyed Iran of its stance, as well as the international community’s stern view, on the nuclear issue. • Last year, Japan continued to maintain a close exchange of views with Iran through mutual visits, including the Regular Japan-Iran Vice-Ministerial Consultations in May in Teheran and in December in Tokyo; a visit to Japan in February by Dr. Mohammad-Javad ARDASHIR=LARIJANI, Secretary General of National Supreme Council of Human Rights of the Judiciary; a visit to Iran in June by Senior Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs Itsunori Onodera; a visit to Japan in October by H.E. Dr. Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, Mayor of Tehran; a visit to Iran in November by Mr. Taro Nakayama, chairman of the Japan-Iran Parliamentarians Friendship League; and a visit to Japan in November by Vice President Esfandyar Rahim MASHAEE. This year, Minister for Foreign Affairs Hirofumi Nakasone held a telephone conference in January with Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Manouchehr Mottaki (on the situation in Gaza). Mr. Samareh Hashemi, Senior Advisor to the President of Iran, visited Japan as a special presidential envoy, and met with Prime Minister Taro Aso, Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura, and Foreign Minister Nakasone. In April, Foreign Minister Mottaki visited Japan to attend the Pakistan Donors Conference and met with Prime Minister Aso and Foreign Minister Nakasone.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
    Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Building on Convergence: Deepening the India – U.S. Strategic Partnership Welcoming Remarks and Introduction: John Hamre, President and CEO, CSIS Moderator: Karl F. Inderfurth, Senior Advisor and Wadhwani Chair in U.S. - India Policy Studies, CSIS Speaker: Ranjan Mathai, Foreign Secretary of India Location: Washington, D.C. Time: 3:00 p.m. EST Date: Monday, February 6, 2012 Transcript by Federal News Service Washington, D.C. JOHN HAMRE: OK, ladies and gentlemen, thank you all very much for coming. My name is John Hamre. I’m the president at CSIS and I am only here in an ornamental role to say thank you to you and to get out of the way as quickly as possible so that you all have a chance to, of course, hear State Secretary Mathai. We are – we’re grateful that he has given us this opportunity, that he’s using CSIS as a platform to address the policy community in Washington. The state secretary is one of the most senior and skilled members of the foreign service in India, and has an exceptionally distinguished career and track record. I’m going to let Rick Inderfurth be the one to formally introduce him. We are fortunate at CSIS that – in the last year to have created an India program. And Ambassador Inderfurth is the first chairholder that would want a chairholder. And we’re very grateful that we have this opportunity to bring such a very senior man to Washington and to have him share his policy insights and perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • IMAM KHOMEINI's VIEWS Dr. Ghulam Habib
    IMAM KHOMEINI’S VIEWS ON EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF FRONT COVER TEACHERS AND ACADEMICIANS Edited by Dr. Ghulam Habib International Association of Muslim University Professors IMAM KHOMEINI’S VIEWS ON EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF TEACHERS AND ACADEMICIANS Edited by Dr. Ghulam Habib International Association of Muslim University Professors CONTENTS PREFACE ...........................................................................................................................i SECTION I THE GREAT VALUE OF KNOWLEDGE The Aim of Education and Training .......................................................................... 3 Encouragement to Acquire Knowledge .................................................................... 8 Knowledge and Faith - Belief and Professional Expertise .................................. 15 SECTION 2 UNIVERSITIES BEFORE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION Colonial Culture and Lack of Real Progress ........................................................... 51 Suppression and Attacks on Universities ................................................................ 95 SECTION 3 UNIVERSITY AND CULTURAL REVOLUTION Universities and Anti-Revolutionary Groups ....................................................... 103 The Need for Cultural Revolution ......................................................................... 120 Establishment of Headquarter for Cultural Revolution ...................................... 156 SECTION 4 THE MISSION OF UNIVERSITIES Manufacturing Human Beings ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blood-Soaked Secrets Why Iran’S 1988 Prison Massacres Are Ongoing Crimes Against Humanity
    BLOOD-SOAKED SECRETS WHY IRAN’S 1988 PRISON MASSACRES ARE ONGOING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Cover photo: Collage of some of the victims of the mass prisoner killings of 1988 in Iran. Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons © Amnesty International (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: MDE 13/9421/2018 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS GLOSSARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 METHODOLOGY 18 2.1 FRAMEWORK AND SCOPE 18 2.2 RESEARCH METHODS 18 2.2.1 TESTIMONIES 20 2.2.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 22 2.2.3 AUDIOVISUAL EVIDENCE 23 2.2.4 COMMUNICATION WITH IRANIAN AUTHORITIES 24 2.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 25 BACKGROUND 26 3.1 PRE-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 26 3.2 POST-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 27 3.3 IRAN-IRAQ WAR 33 3.4 POLITICAL OPPOSITION GROUPS 33 3.4.1 PEOPLE’S MOJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN 33 3.4.2 FADAIYAN 34 3.4.3 TUDEH PARTY 35 3.4.4 KURDISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF IRAN 35 3.4.5 KOMALA 35 3.4.6 OTHER GROUPS 36 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Nuclear Ambitions From
    IDENTITY AND LEGITIMACY: IRAN’S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS FROM NON- TRADITIONAL PERSPECTIVES Pupak Mohebali Doctor of Philosophy University of York Politics June 2017 Abstract This thesis examines the impact of Iranian elites’ conceptions of national identity on decisions affecting Iran's nuclear programme and the P5+1 nuclear negotiations. “Why has the development of an indigenous nuclear fuel cycle been portrayed as a unifying symbol of national identity in Iran, especially since 2002 following the revelation of clandestine nuclear activities”? This is the key research question that explores the Iranian political elites’ perspectives on nuclear policy actions. My main empirical data is elite interviews. Another valuable source of empirical data is a discourse analysis of Iranian leaders’ statements on various aspects of the nuclear programme. The major focus of the thesis is how the discourses of Iranian national identity have been influential in nuclear decision-making among the national elites. In this thesis, I examine Iranian national identity components, including Persian nationalism, Shia Islamic identity, Islamic Revolutionary ideology, and modernity and technological advancement. Traditional rationalist IR approaches, such as realism fail to explain how effective national identity is in the context of foreign policy decision-making. I thus discuss the connection between national identity, prestige and bargaining leverage using a social constructivist approach. According to constructivism, states’ cultures and identities are not established realities, but the outcomes of historical and social processes. The Iranian nuclear programme has a symbolic nature that mingles with socially constructed values. There is the need to look at Iran’s nuclear intentions not necessarily through the lens of a nuclear weapons programme, but rather through the regime’s overall nuclear aspirations.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographics, Laboratory Parameters and Outcomes of 1061 Patients with COVID-19: a Report from Tehran, Iran
    Journal Pre-proof Demographics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of 1061 patients with COVID-19: A report from Tehran, Iran Mihan Pourabdollah Toutkaboni, Elham Askari, Nastaran Khalili, Payam Tabarsi, Hamidreza Jamaati, Ali Akbar Velayati, Atosa Dorudinia, Mitrasadat Rezaei, Seyed Alireza Nadji, Abdolreza Mohamadnia, Neda Khalili PII: S2052-2975(20)30129-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100777 Reference: NMNI 100777 To appear in: New Microbes and New Infections Received Date: 17 June 2020 Revised Date: 27 September 2020 Accepted Date: 29 September 2020 Please cite this article as: Toutkaboni MP, Askari E, Khalili N, Tabarsi P, Jamaati H, Velayati AA, Dorudinia A, Rezaei M, Nadji SA, Mohamadnia A, Khalili N, Demographics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of 1061 patients with COVID-19: A report from Tehran, Iran, New Microbes and New Infections, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100777. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Demographics, laboratory parameters
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #867
    USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Maxwell AFB, Alabama Issue No. 867, 14 December 2010 Articles & Other Documents: WH: Obama Won't Leave DC until Nuke Deal is Done S. Korea, U.S. Launch Joint Committee to Deter N. Korea's Nuclear Threats START Pact Has Enough Votes, U.S. Aide Says N Korea's Nuclear Capacity Worries Russia Clock Ticking, Obama Urges Senate OK of Arms Treaty S.Korea Suspects Secret Uranium Enrichment in North Senate Working on Ratification of U.S.-Russian Strategic Arms Treaty - White House US Suspects Secret Burma Nuclear Sites Manouchehr Mottaki Fired from Iran Foreign Minister Burma Not Nuclear, Says Abhisit Job Test of Agni-II's Advanced Version Fails Intelligence Chiefs Fear Nuclear War between Israel and Tehran Russian Military to Receive 1,300 Types of Weaponry by 2020 Rudd Calls for Inspections of Israel's Nuclear Facility Russia, NATO May Make Soon Progress in Joint Iran Foreign Policy 'Unchanged' by Mottaki Sacking Missile Defense Progress North Korea Stresses Commitment to Nuclear Weapons Bolivia Rejects Alvaro Uribe’s Accusations about Nuclear Program N. Korean FM Defends Pyongyang's Decision to Bolster Nuclear Arsenal U.S. to Spend $1B Over Five Years on Conventional Strike Systems Japan Plans more Patriot Systems to Shoot Down N. Korean Missiles Talks with Iran Just a Start Iran's Nuclear Plans Give West a Tough Choice Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information.
    [Show full text]
  • Tightening the Reins How Khamenei Makes Decisions
    MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS MEHDI KHALAJI TIGHTENING THE REINS HOW KHAMENEI MAKES DECISIONS POLICY FOCUS 126 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org Policy Focus 126 | March 2014 The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including pho- tocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2014 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Cover: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei holds a weapon as he speaks at the University of Tehran. (Reuters/Raheb Homavandi). Design: 1000 Colors CONTENTS Executive Summary | V 1. Introduction | 1 2. Life and Thought of the Leader | 7 3. Khamenei’s Values | 15 4. Khamenei’s Advisors | 20 5. Khamenei vs the Clergy | 27 6. Khamenei vs the President | 34 7. Khamenei vs Political Institutions | 44 8. Khamenei’s Relationship with the IRGC | 52 9. Conclusion | 61 Appendix: Profile of Hassan Rouhani | 65 About the Author | 72 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVEN UNDER ITS MOST DESPOTIC REGIMES , modern Iran has long been governed with some degree of consensus among elite factions. Leaders have conceded to or co-opted rivals when necessary to maintain their grip on power, and the current regime is no excep- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition April 26 2012
    a report of the csis burke chair in strategy U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition: The Sanctions game: Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Authors Anthony H. Cordesman Bradley Bosserman Sam Khazai April 2012 The Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy has prepared this book as part of a project supported by the Smith Richardson Foundation. Iran V: Sanctions Competition AHC April 26, 2012 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report analyzes US and Iranian strategic competition in four key areas—sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. It shows that shifts in the nature and intensity of sanctions on Iran have radically changed this aspect of US and Iranian competition since the Fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by Iran’s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear programs, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report highlighting the probable military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program. It has also been spurred by incidents like an Iranian assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian-government-sponsored mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and Iranian threats to “close” the Gulf to oil exports. A New Round of Sanctions Iran’s steady progress towards the capability to build nuclear weapons has led to a new round of sanctions from the US and its allies. Washington has sought to further isolate Iran economically through new US sanctions on the Iranian Central Bank and Iranian companies involved in its nuclear industry, including the petrochemical and oil industry. Iran’s primary source of revenue—crude oil exports—is further threatened by a unanimous decision by the European Union on January 23rd to impose a full embargo on the import of Iranian oil and petrochemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition
    Iran V: Sanctions Competition January 4, 2013 0 U.S. AND IRANIAN STRATEGIC COMPETITION Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Anthony H. Cordesman, Bryan Gold, Sam Khazai, and Bradley Bosserman April 19, 2013 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Note: This report is will be updated. Please provide comments and suggestions to [email protected] Iran V: Sanctions Competition April, 19 2013 I Executive Summary This report analyzes four key aspects of US and Iranian strategic competition - sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. Its primary focus is on the ways in which the sanctions applied to Iran have changed US and Iranian competition since the fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by the creation of a series of far stronger US unilateral sanctions and the EU‘s imposition of equally strong sanctions – both of which affect Iran‘s ability to export, its financial system and its overall economy. It has been spurred by Iran‘s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear program, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report that highlights the probable military dimensions of Iran‘s nuclear program. And, by Iranian rhetoric, by Iranian threats to ―close‖ the Gulf to oil traffic; increased support of the Quds Force and pro-Shiite governments and non-state actors; and by incidents like the Iranian-sponsored assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian government instigated mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and the Iranian-linked attacks against Israeli diplomats.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy
    Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs August 14, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32048 Iran, Gulf Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, a priority of U.S. policy has been to reduce the perceived threat posed by Iran to a broad range of U.S. interests, including the security of the Persian Gulf region. In 2014, a common adversary emerged in the form of the Islamic State organization, reducing gaps in U.S. and Iranian regional interests, although the two countries have often differing approaches over how to try to defeat the group. The finalization on July 14, 2015, of a “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” (JCPOA) between Iran and six negotiating powers could enhance Iran’s ability to counter the United States and its allies in the region, but could also pave the way for cooperation to resolve some of the region’s several conflicts. During the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. officials identified Iran’s support for militant Middle East groups as a significant threat to U.S. interests and allies. A perceived potential threat from Iran’s nuclear program emerged in 2002, and the United States orchestrated broad international economic pressure on Iran to try to ensure that the program is verifiably confined to purely peaceful purposes. The international pressure contributed to the June 2013 election as president of Iran of the relatively moderate Hassan Rouhani, who campaigned as an advocate of ending Iran’s international isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran March 2009
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN, FROM 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.03 Iran............................................................................................. 1.03 Tehran ....................................................................................... 1.04 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................ 2.01 Sanctions ...................................................................................... 2.13 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................... 3.01 Calendar ........................................................................................ 3.02 Pre 1979......................................................................................... 3.03 1979 to 1999 .................................................................................. 3.05 2000 to date................................................................................... 3.16 Student unrest .............................................................................
    [Show full text]