Fduimun 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition April 26 2012
a report of the csis burke chair in strategy U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition: The Sanctions game: Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Authors Anthony H. Cordesman Bradley Bosserman Sam Khazai April 2012 The Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy has prepared this book as part of a project supported by the Smith Richardson Foundation. Iran V: Sanctions Competition AHC April 26, 2012 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report analyzes US and Iranian strategic competition in four key areas—sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. It shows that shifts in the nature and intensity of sanctions on Iran have radically changed this aspect of US and Iranian competition since the Fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by Iran’s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear programs, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report highlighting the probable military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program. It has also been spurred by incidents like an Iranian assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian-government-sponsored mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and Iranian threats to “close” the Gulf to oil exports. A New Round of Sanctions Iran’s steady progress towards the capability to build nuclear weapons has led to a new round of sanctions from the US and its allies. Washington has sought to further isolate Iran economically through new US sanctions on the Iranian Central Bank and Iranian companies involved in its nuclear industry, including the petrochemical and oil industry. Iran’s primary source of revenue—crude oil exports—is further threatened by a unanimous decision by the European Union on January 23rd to impose a full embargo on the import of Iranian oil and petrochemicals. -
U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition
Iran V: Sanctions Competition January 4, 2013 0 U.S. AND IRANIAN STRATEGIC COMPETITION Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Anthony H. Cordesman, Bryan Gold, Sam Khazai, and Bradley Bosserman April 19, 2013 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Note: This report is will be updated. Please provide comments and suggestions to [email protected] Iran V: Sanctions Competition April, 19 2013 I Executive Summary This report analyzes four key aspects of US and Iranian strategic competition - sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. Its primary focus is on the ways in which the sanctions applied to Iran have changed US and Iranian competition since the fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by the creation of a series of far stronger US unilateral sanctions and the EU‘s imposition of equally strong sanctions – both of which affect Iran‘s ability to export, its financial system and its overall economy. It has been spurred by Iran‘s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear program, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report that highlights the probable military dimensions of Iran‘s nuclear program. And, by Iranian rhetoric, by Iranian threats to ―close‖ the Gulf to oil traffic; increased support of the Quds Force and pro-Shiite governments and non-state actors; and by incidents like the Iranian-sponsored assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian government instigated mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and the Iranian-linked attacks against Israeli diplomats. -
Iran March 2009
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN, FROM 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.03 Iran............................................................................................. 1.03 Tehran ....................................................................................... 1.04 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................ 2.01 Sanctions ...................................................................................... 2.13 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................... 3.01 Calendar ........................................................................................ 3.02 Pre 1979......................................................................................... 3.03 1979 to 1999 .................................................................................. 3.05 2000 to date................................................................................... 3.16 Student unrest ............................................................................. -
Orsam-Gnlk-Ortadou-Blten-07-05-2013.Pdf
MIDDLE EAST DAILY BULLETIN 6 May 2013 NO: 1595 1. IRAQ ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Othman urges the central government to speed up implementing legitimate demands of the demonstrators ......................................................................................................................................3 MP warns of internal fighting in the protests governorates ........................................................3 Maliki's coalition candidate in Basra split ....................................................................................4 Marjaa Yacoubi talks about satanic projects for Iraq ...................................................................5 JFO: Press freedom is the worst in Iraq ........................................................................................6 Iraq to buy 18 more Lockheed F-16 fighters ................................................................................7 Kurdistan reveals Barzani - Maliki seven-point agreement ..........................................................8 Iraq unity will thwart enemy plots: Iran FM .................................................................................9 Iraqi troops kill 14 militants, arrest 10 others in Mosul ............................................................ 11 Iraqi PM's coalition leads in local vote ...................................................................................... 11 2. -
B COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 Concerning Restrictive Measures Against Iran and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, P
2012R0267 — EN — 27.06.2015 — 014.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 350/2012 of 23 April 2012 L 110 17 24.4.2012 ►M2 Council Regulation (EU) No 708/2012 of 2 August 2012 L 208 1 3.8.2012 ►M3 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 709/2012 of 2 August 2012 L 208 2 3.8.2012 ►M4 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 L 282 16 16.10.2012 October 2012 ►M5 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1016/2012 of 6 L 307 5 7.11.2012 November 2012 ►M6 Council Regulation (EU) No 1067/2012 of 14 November 2012 L 318 1 15.11.2012 ►M7 Council Regulation (EU) No 1263/2012 of 21 December 2012 L 356 34 22.12.2012 ►M8 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 L 356 55 22.12.2012 December 2012 ►M9 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 522/2013 of 6 June 2013 L 156 3 8.6.2013 ►M10 Council Regulation (EU) No 517/2013 of 13 May 2013 L 158 1 10.6.2013 ►M11 Council Regulation (EU) No 971/2013 of 10 October 2013 L 272 1 12.10.2013 ►M12 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1154/2013 of 15 L 306 3 16.11.2013 November 2013 ►M13 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1203/2013 of 26 L 316 1 27.11.2013 November 2013 ►M14 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1361/2013 of 17 L 343 7 19.12.2013 -
Iran Case File (May 2019)
IRAN CASE FILE May 2020 RASANAH International Institute for Iranian Studies, Al-Takhassusi St. Sahafah, Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. P.O. Box: 12275 | Zip code: 11473 Contact us [email protected] +966112166696 The Executive Summary ........................................................................ 4 Internal Affairs .................................................................................... 7 The Ideological File ......................................................................................8 I- Officially Reopening Mosques and Shrines ....................................................... 8 II- Resuming Religious Seminary Lessons ........................................................... 9 III- Pressures on Iraq .........................................................................................10 The Political File ........................................................................................ 12 I- The Makeup of the New Parliament: Conservative Domination and Reformist Decline ............................................... 12 II- The Conservatives Contest Among Themselves for the Speakership ............... 13 III- Ghalibaf’s Criticism of the Government Forebodes a Possible Standoff Between Rouhani and the Parliament .................................. 14 The Economic File ...................................................................................... 16 I- The Economic Developments Between Iran and Venezuela .............................16 II- The Iranian Objectives and Messages of -
B C1 COUNCIL DECISION 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010
2010D0413 — EN — 08.06.2013 — 011.002 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B ►C1 COUNCIL DECISION 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP ◄ (OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 L 281 81 27.10.2010 ►M2 Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 L 136 65 24.5.2011 ►M3 Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 L 319 71 2.12.2011 ►M4 Council Decision 2012/35/CFSP of 23 January 2012 L 19 22 24.1.2012 ►M5 Council Decision 2012/152/CFSP of 15 March 2012 L 77 18 16.3.2012 ►M6 Council Decision 2012/169/CFSP of 23 March 2012 L 87 90 24.3.2012 ►M7 Council Decision 2012/205/CFSP of 23 April 2012 L 110 35 24.4.2012 ►M8 Council Decision 2012/457/CFSP of 2 August 2012 L 208 18 3.8.2012 ►M9 Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 L 282 58 16.10.2012 ►M10 Council Decision 2012/687/CFSP of 6 November 2012 L 307 82 7.11.2012 ►M11 Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 L 356 71 22.12.2012 ►M12 Council Decision 2013/270/CFSP of 6 June 2013 L 156 10 8.6.2013 Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 197, 29.7.2010, p. -
B C1 DECISIONE 2010/413/PESC DEL CONSIGLIO, Del 26 Luglio
02010D0413 — IT — 29.05.2019 — 031.001 — 1 Il presente testo è un semplice strumento di documentazione e non produce alcun effetto giuridico. Le istituzioni dell’Unione non assumono alcuna responsabilità per i suoi contenuti. Le versioni facenti fede degli atti pertinenti, compresi i loro preamboli, sono quelle pubblicate nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea e disponibili in EUR-Lex. Tali testi ufficiali sono direttamente accessibili attraverso i link inseriti nel presente documento ►B ►C1 DECISIONE 2010/413/PESC DEL CONSIGLIO, del 26 luglio 2010, concernente misure restrittive nei confronti dell’Iran e che abroga la posizione comune 2007/140/PESC ◄ (GU L 195 del 27.7.2010, pag. 39) Modificata da: Gazzetta ufficiale n. pag. data ►M1 Decisione 2010/644/PESC del Consiglio del 25 ottobre 2010 L 281 81 27.10.2010 ►M2 Decisione 2011/299/PESC del Consiglio del 23 maggio 2011 L 136 65 24.5.2011 ►M3 Decisione 2011/783/PESC del Consiglio del 1 o dicembre 2011 L 319 71 2.12.2011 ►M4 Decisione 2012/35/PESC del Consiglio del 23 gennaio 2012 L 19 22 24.1.2012 ►M5 Decisione 2012/152/PESC del Consiglio del 15 marzo 2012 L 77 18 16.3.2012 ►M6 Decisione 2012/169/PESC del Consiglio del 23 marzo 2012 L 87 90 24.3.2012 ►M7 Decisione 2012/205/PESC del Consiglio del 23 aprile 2012 L 110 35 24.4.2012 ►M8 Decisione 2012/457/PESC del Consiglio del 2 agosto 2012 L 208 18 3.8.2012 ►M9 Decisione 2012/635/PESC del Consiglio del 15 ottobre 2012 L 282 58 16.10.2012 ►M10 Decisione 2012/687/PESC del Consiglio del 6 novembre 2012 L 307 82 7.11.2012 ►M11 Decisione -
Indo- Iran Political Relationship from 2002 to 2013
International Affairs and Global Strategy www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-574X (Paper) ISSN 2224-8951 (Online) Vol.43, 2016 Indo- Iran Political relationship from 2002 to 2013 MUSHTAQ AHMAD GANAI: Dr. A.P. PANDEY. Department of social science Barkatullah University Bhopal Introduction In 1990’s as much as diplomatic ties of India and Iran are concerned Iran supported the Northern alliance in Afghanistan against the Taliban regime. Islamic religion and culture became a new link of relations after the Islamic conquests. Relations during the cold war era between the two countries were aloof, while Iran enjoys good relations with the US and India adopted Non -Alignment policy that included a Socialist world. The whole scenario of relationship between these two countries was changed by the dawn of Iran’s Islamic revolution and relations were still cold. After Islamic revolution, Iran left pro American Orientation and became a member of Non- Alignment. While India was in suspense of Iran’s efforts to export the revolution throughout the Muslim world. The most important phase of relations was in September 1993 when Indian Prime Minister Shri Narasimha Rao visited Iran, and in 1995 the Iranian president Akbar Hashmi Rafsanjani visited India and in October 1996, Indian vice President Shri R K Narayanan paid their visit to Iran. Keywords: India, Iran, high level official visits, Agreements, Economic relations. Political relations Relations between them were further strengthened with the visit of Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 2001 and a return visit was paid by Iranian President Mohammad Khatami in 2003, and was also a chief guest at the Republic Day Parade. -
Report Twenty-Sixth Session of the Comcec
OIC/COMCEC/26-10/REP COMCEC Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of the Islamic Conference REPORT TWENTY-SIXTH SESSION OF THE COMCEC İstanbul, 5-8 October 2010 COMCEC Coordination Office Ankara, October 2010 1 Address: COMCEC Coordination Office State Planning Organization Necatibey Cad. 108 Ankara-TURKEY Phone : 90-312-294 55 10 Fax : 90-312-294 55 77 Website: http://www.comcec.org e-mail : comcec @ dpt.gov.tr 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS P A R T O N E Page RESOLUTIONS OF THE OIC FORMING THE BASIS AND GUIDING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL COOPERATION OF THE OIC I. Resolution adopted at the Third Islamic Summit Conference Establishing the Standing Committees of the OIC chaired by Heads of State ............................................ 9 II. Final Communique of the Fourth Islamic Summit Conference Entrusting the Chairmanship of the Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation to the President of the Republic of Turkey ............................. 11 III. Resolution No. 1/11-E (IS) on the Activities of the Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation (COMCEC) .................................................... 13 P A R T T W O LIST OF BASIC DOCUMENTS AND REPORT OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH SESSION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL COOPERATION I. List of Basic Documents Considered and/or Presented at the Twenty-sixth Session of the COMCEC ......................... 23 II. Report of the Twenty-sixth Session of the COMCEC......... 29 3 Page A N N E X E S 1. List of Participants of the Twenty-sixth Session of the COMCEC...................................................................................... 43 2. -
Countries at the Crossroads Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Iran
Countries at the Crossroads Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Iran Introduction The Islamic Republic of Iran was created following the 1979 revolution led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini that replaced the Pahlavi monarchy. Khomeini promised millions of Iranians freedom and justice, but 33 years later, both remain elusive. The Iranian people continue to live under an increasingly repressive and intolerant regime while having no say in their future. The political system in the Islamic Republic is predicated on unelected institutions and undemocratic concepts. Foremost among these is Khomeini’s principle of velayat faqih, or “rule of the supreme jurist.” According to this idea, in the absence of the Hidden Imam—the 12th historical leader of the Shiites, who they believe will return to save the world—absolute religious and political authority rests in the hands of a senior cleric, the supreme leader. The president and the parliament are at least nominally elected. The system has failed to avoid tensions between the supreme leader and the president, even though ultimate power rests in the hands of the former, currently Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the unelected institutions under his control. These include the Guardian Council, which must approve all election candidates and legislation; the judiciary, which has functioned as a tool for silencing critics of the regime; the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), tasked with safeguarding the principles of the revolution; and the Basij militia, a paramilitary volunteer force that operates under the IRGC’s command. Khamenei, his institutions, and his allies have effectively blocked political reforms and efforts to introduce civil liberties. -
US and Iranian Strategic Competition: Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control
Burke Chair in Strategy U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change By Bryan Gold, Anthony H. Cordesman, and Chloe Coughlin-Schulte July 22, 2013 Request for comments: This report is a draft that will be turned into an electronic book. Comments and suggested changes would be greatly appreciated. Please send any comments to Anthony H. Cordsman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, at [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Iran: Sanctions Competition July 22, 2013 ii Acknowledgements This analysis was written with the assistance of Sam Khazai and Bradley Bosserman. Iran: Sanctions Competition July 22, 2013 iii Executive Summary This report analyzes four key aspects of US and Iranian strategic competition - sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. Its primary focus is on the ways in which the sanctions applied to Iran have changed US and Iranian competition since the fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by the creation of a series of far stronger US unilateral sanctions and the EU’s imposition of equally strong sanctions – both of which affect Iran’s ability to export, its financial system, and its overall economy. It has been spurred by by Iran’s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear program, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report that highlights the probable military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program. Additional contributing factors include Iranian rhetoric, Iranian threats to ―close‖ the Gulf to oil traffic; increased support of the Quds Force, pro-Shiite governments, and non-state actors; and incidents like the Iranian-sponsored assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian government instigated mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and the Iranian-linked attacks against Israeli diplomats.