DOCSLIB.ORG

I NUCLEAR WEAPONS AFTER the COLD WAR: CHANGE and CONTINUITY IN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NUCLEAR WEAPONS AFTER THE COLD WAR: CHANGE AND CONTINUITY IN PUBLIC DISCOURSES by David Cram Helwich Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science, University of Wyoming, 1997 Master of Arts, University of Wyoming, 2000 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of College of Liberal Arts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2011 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by David Cram Helwich It was defended on January 24, 2011 and approved by William Keller, PhD, Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs John Lyne, PhD, Professor, Communication John Poulakos, PhD, Associate Professor, Comunication Dissertation Advisor: Gordon Mitchell, PhD, Associate Professor, Communication ii Copyright © by David Cram Helwich 2011 iii NUCLEAR WEAPONS AFTER THE COLD WAR: CHANGE AND CONTINUITY IN PUBLIC DISCOURSES David Cram Helwich, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2011 This dissertation assesses the rhetorical dynamics of American public argumentation about the appropriate role of nuclear weapons since the end of the Cold War. Four case studies are examined, including the controversy created by “fallen priests” like General George Lee Butler, the U.S. Senate’s deliberations on ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the George W. Bush administration’s campaign to implement its 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, and the public debate about the development and deployment of “mini” nuclear weapons. Collectively, the case studies reveal that a potent combination of institutional interests, restricted access to official deliberative spaces, the deployment of threat discourses, the presumption that nuclear deterrence was effective during the Cold War, and the utilization of technical discursive practices narrowed the scope of public debate about the role of nuclear weapons and allowed advocates of robust nuclear deterrence to construct rhetorical and policy bridges between the Cold War and post-Cold War eras. “Security” and “risk management” frames dominated public discussions about nuclear weapons, and advocates of nuclear abolition were largely unsuccessful in their efforts to reconfigure public argumentation on nuclear weapons policy. iv A.1.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NUCLEAR WEAPONS AFTER THE COLD WAR ....................................... 1 1.2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Rhetorical Criticism of U.S. Foreign Policy .................................................. 6 1.2.2 Public Sphere Theory .................................................................................... 12 1.2.3 Nuclear Rhetorical Criticism and ‘Nukespeak’ .......................................... 20 1.2.4 Other Disciplines............................................................................................ 28 1.3 RATIONALE, QUESTIONS, AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ........ 34 2.0 THE FALLEN NUCLEAR PRIEST ........................................................................ 45 2.1 BUTLER’S CASE FOR ABOLITION ............................................................ 52 2.2 A FALLEN PRIEST .......................................................................................... 62 2.2.1 Butler’s Resume ............................................................................................. 62 2.2.2 Butler’s Portraiture ....................................................................................... 66 2.2.3 Butler’s Reception ......................................................................................... 81 2.3 THE GENERAL’S CRITICS RESPOND ....................................................... 85 2.3.1 The Head Priest ............................................................................................. 86 2.3.2 The Church .................................................................................................. 101 2.3.3 Continuity and Change from the Cold War ............................................. 112 v 2.3.4 Concluding Thoughts .................................................................................. 115 3.0 THE COMPREHENSIVE TEST BAN TREATY ................................................ 119 3.1 CONTROVERSY IN CONTEXT .................................................................. 123 3.1.1 Domestic Political Context .......................................................................... 123 3.1.2 Geopolitical Context .................................................................................... 130 3.2 CASES FOR AND AGAINST RATIFICATION ......................................... 141 3.2.1 Arsenal Reliability ....................................................................................... 145 3.2.1.1 Will the SSP Be Effective? ................................................................ 147 3.2.1.2 Will the SSP Be Ready in Time?...................................................... 152 3.2.1.3 Will the SSP Be Adequately Funded in the Future?...................... 155 3.2.1.4 Do “Talent” and “Data Gaps” Threaten the SSP? ........................ 156 3.2.1.5 Will Re-manufacturing Reliably Extend Arsenal Life? ................ 159 3.2.1.6 Do Safeguards Adequately Protect Against Future Threats? ...... 162 3.2.2 Modernization .............................................................................................. 167 3.2.2.1 Is the CTBT a Backdoor to Eventual Disarmament? .................... 169 3.2.2.2 Does the CTBT Preclude Responding to New Security Threats? 174 3.2.2.3 Does the CTBT Threaten Arsenal Safety? ..................................... 180 3.2.2.4 Can Confidence in the Arsenal Be Maintained without Testing? 183 3.2.3 Nonproliferation and Verification ............................................................. 193 3.2.3.1 Can “Militarily Significant” Tests Be Detected and Deterred? .... 195 3.2.3.2 Are IMS Monitoring Systems Effective? ........................................ 200 3.2.3.3 Do Definitional Problems Sabotage Treaty Effectiveness? ........... 208 3.2.3.4 Is Nuclear Testing a Prerequisite to Nuclear Proliferation? ......... 210 vi 3.2.3.5 Does the CTBT Solidify Norms Against Nuclear Proliferation? .. 213 3.2.4 Key Aspects of the Security and Risk Management Frames ................... 222 3.3 ANALYZING THE SENATE DEBATE ....................................................... 226 3.3.1 Limited Access to Deliberative Spaces ....................................................... 227 3.3.2 Truncated Deliberations ............................................................................. 232 3.3.3 Advocate Credibility Problems .................................................................. 240 3.3.4 Presumption for Deterrence ....................................................................... 247 3.3.5 Role of Secret Evidence ............................................................................... 252 3.3.6 Concluding Thoughts .................................................................................. 256 4.0 THE 2001 NUCLEAR POSTURE REVIEW ........................................................ 260 4.1 CONTROVERSY IN CONTEXT .................................................................. 265 4.2 BREAK WITH THE COLD WAR ................................................................ 271 4.3 RECEPTION AND RESPONSE .................................................................... 290 4.3.1 Capabilities-Based Force Structure ........................................................... 292 4.3.2 Reconfiguration of Arms Control .............................................................. 299 4.3.3 Russia and the Cold War Hangover .......................................................... 303 4.3.4 The “Nuclear Hit-List” ............................................................................... 306 4.4 CONCLUDING THOUGHTS ........................................................................ 309 5.0 “MINI-NUKES” & “BUNKER BUSTERS” ......................................................... 323 5.1 CONTROVERSY IN CONTEXT .................................................................. 325 5.1.1 Mini-nukes as a Recurring Controversy ................................................... 326 5.1.2 Hard and Deeply Buried Targets ............................................................... 329 5.1.3 2001 Defense Authorization Bill ................................................................. 335 vii 5.1.4 Implementing the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review ...................................... 337 5.2 THE ADMINISTRATION’S CASE .............................................................. 341 5.2.1 New Threats ................................................................................................. 343 5.2.2 Arsenal Deficiencies and Self-Deterrence .................................................. 347 5.2.3 Promise of New Weapons............................................................................ 349 5.3 THE CRITICS RESPOND ............................................................................. 352 5.3.1 Deterrence Failure ....................................................................................... 353 5.3.2 Fallout and “Collateral Damage” .............................................................. 358 5.3.3 Proliferation ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
  • Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage

    Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage

    Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage Aaron Joseph Johnson Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Aaron Joseph Johnson All rights reserved ABSTRACT Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage Aaron Joseph Johnson This dissertation is a study of jazz on American radio. The dissertation's meta-subjects are mediation, classification, and patronage in the presentation of music via distribution channels capable of reaching widespread audiences. The dissertation also addresses questions of race in the representation of jazz on radio. A central claim of the dissertation is that a given direction in jazz radio programming reflects the ideological, aesthetic, and political imperatives of a given broadcasting entity. I further argue that this ideological deployment of jazz can appear as conservative or progressive programming philosophies, and that these tendencies reflect discursive struggles over the identity of jazz. The first chapter, "Jazz on Noncommercial Radio," describes in some detail the current (circa 2013) taxonomy of American jazz radio. The remaining chapters are case studies of different aspects of jazz radio in the United States. Chapter 2, "Jazz is on the Left End of the Dial," presents considerable detail to the way the music is positioned on specific noncommercial stations. Chapter 3, "Duke Ellington and Radio," uses Ellington's multifaceted radio career (1925-1953) as radio bandleader, radio celebrity, and celebrity DJ to examine the medium's shifting relationship with jazz and black American creative ambition.
  • Air and Space Power Journal: Winter 2009

    Air and Space Power Journal: Winter 2009

    SPINE AIR & SP A CE Winter 2009 Volume XXIII, No. 4 P OWER JOURN Directed Energy A Look to the Future Maj Gen David Scott, USAF Col David Robie, USAF A L , W Hybrid Warfare inter 2009 Something Old, Not Something New Hon. Robert Wilkie Preparing for Irregular Warfare The Future Ain’t What It Used to Be Col John D. Jogerst, USAF, Retired Achieving Balance Energy, Effectiveness, and Efficiency Col John B. Wissler, USAF US Nuclear Deterrence An Opportunity for President Obama to Lead by Example Group Capt Tim D. Q. Below, Royal Air Force 2009-4 Outside Cover.indd 1 10/27/09 8:54:50 AM SPINE Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen Norton A. Schwartz Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Stephen R. Lorenz Commander, Air University Lt Gen Allen G. Peck http://www.af.mil Director, Air Force Research Institute Gen John A. Shaud, USAF, Retired Chief, Professional Journals Maj Darren K. Stanford Deputy Chief, Professional Journals Capt Lori Katowich Professional Staff http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor Darlene H. Barnes, Editorial Assistant Steven C. Garst, Director of Art and Production Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator L. Susan Fair, Illustrator Ann Bailey, Prepress Production Manager The Air and Space Power Journal (ISSN 1554-2505), Air Force Recurring Publication 10-1, published quarterly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for the http://www.au.af.mil presentation and stimulation of innovative thinking on military doctrine, strategy, force structure, readiness, and other matters of national defense.
  • Chasing Success

    Chasing Success

    AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Chasing Success Air Force Efforts to Reduce Civilian Harm Sarah B. Sewall Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Sewall, Sarah B. Copy Editor Carolyn Burns Chasing success : Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm / Sarah B. Sewall. Cover Art, Book Design and Illustrations pages cm L. Susan Fair ISBN 978-1-58566-256-2 Composition and Prepress Production 1. Air power—United States—Government policy. Nedra O. Looney 2. United States. Air Force—Rules and practice. 3. Civilian war casualties—Prevention. 4. Civilian Print Preparation and Distribution Diane Clark war casualties—Government policy—United States. 5. Combatants and noncombatants (International law)—History. 6. War victims—Moral and ethical aspects. 7. Harm reduction—Government policy— United States. 8. United States—Military policy— Moral and ethical aspects. I. Title. II. Title: Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm. UG633.S38 2015 358.4’03—dc23 2015026952 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Published by Air University Press in March 2016 Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N. Twining St., Bldg. 693 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 [email protected] http://aupress.au.af.mil/ http://afri.au.af.mil/ Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated or the views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any AFRI other US government agency.
  • Complete Report

    Complete Report

    FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 2, 2017 BY Amy Mitchell, Jeffrey Gottfried, Galen Stocking, Katerina Matsa and Elizabeth M. Grieco FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research Rachel Weisel, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, October, 2017, “Covering President Trump in a Polarized Media Environment” 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. © Pew Research Center 2017 www.pewresearch.org 3 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Table of Contents About Pew Research Center 2 Table of Contents 3 Covering President Trump in a Polarized Media Environment 4 1. Coverage from news outlets with a right-leaning audience cited fewer source types, featured more positive assessments than coverage from other two groups 14 2. Five topics accounted for two-thirds of coverage in first 100 days 25 3. A comparison to early coverage of past
  • Nuclear Futures: Western European Options for Nuclear Risk Reduction

    Nuclear Futures: Western European Options for Nuclear Risk Reduction

    Nuclear futures: Western European options for nuclear risk reduction Martin Butcher, Otfried Nassauer & Stephen Young British American Security Information Council and the Berlin Information-center for Transatlantic Security (BITS), December 1998 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Executive Summary Chapter One: Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Policy in Western Europe Chapter Two: The United Kingdom Chapter Three: France Chapter Four: Nuclear Co-operation Chapter Five: NATO Europe Chapter Six: Nuclear Risk Reduction in Western Europe Endnotes About the authors Martin Butcher is the Director of the Centre for European Security and Disarmament (CESD), a Brussels-based non-governmental organization. Currently, he is a Visiting Fellow at BASIC’s Washington office. Otfried Nassauer is the Director of the Berlin Information-center for Transatlantic Security (BITS). Stephen Young is a Senior Analyst as BASIC. Previously, he worked for 20/20 Vision and for ACCESS: A Security Information Service. He has a Masters in International Affairs from Columbia University, and a BA from Carleton College. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the many people who pro-vided help of various kinds during the writing of this report. They include: Nicola Butler, for her inestimable assistance; Ambassador James Leonard, for his helpful comments on the report’s recommendations; Professors Paul Rogers and Patricia Chilton, for their comments on early drafts; Daniel Plesch, for his comments on the entire report; and Camille Grand, for his guidance and support in compiling the section on France. Special thanks to Lucy Amis and Tanya Padberg for excellent proofing and copy-editing work, and to Christine Kucia and Kate Joseph for advice and assistance on the layout and design of the report.
  • H-Diplo | ISSF POLICY Series America and the World—2017 and Beyond

    H-Diplo | ISSF POLICY Series America and the World—2017 and Beyond

    H-Diplo | ISSF POLICY Series America and the World—2017 and Beyond Fractured: Trump’s Foreign Policy after Two Years Essay by David C. Hendrickson, Colorado College Published on 29 January 2019 | issforum.org Editor: Diane Labrosse Web and Production Editor: George Fujii Shortlink: http://tiny.cc/PR-1-5BN Permalink: http://issforum.org/roundtables/policy/1-5BN-fractured PDF URL: http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/Policy-Roundtable-1-5BN.pdf he presidency of Donald Trump is the strangest act in American history; unprecedented in form, in style an endless sequence of improvisations and malapropisms.1 But in substance there is continuity, probably much more than is customarily recognized. It is hard to recognize the continuity, amid the Tdaily meltd owns (and biennial shutdowns), but it exists. In large measure Trump has been a Republican president, carrying out a Republican agenda. His attack on the regulatory agencies follows a Republican script. His call for a prodigious boost to military spending, combined with sharp cuts in taxes, has been the Republican program since the time of Ronald Reagan’s presidency. His climate skepticism corresponds with that of Republican leaders in Congress. On trade and immigration, Trump has departed most radically from Bush Republicanism, but even in that regard Trump’s policies harken back to older traditions in the Grand Old Party. He is different in character and temperament from every Republican predecessor as president, yet has attached himself to much of the traditional Republican program.2 It is in foreign policy, the subject of this essay, where Trump’s role has been most disorienting, his performance ‘up-ending’ in substance and method.
  • Amicus Brief

    Amicus Brief

    No. 20-255 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____________ MAHANOY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, V. B.L., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER FATHER LAWRENCE LEVY AND HER MOTHER BETTY LOU LEVY, _____________ Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit _____________ BRIEF OF THE STUDENT PRESS LAW CENTER, ASSOCIATED COLLEGIATE PRESS, CENTER FOR SCHOLASTIC JOURNALISM, FREEDOM TO READ FOUNDATION, JOURNALISM EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL SCHOLASTIC PRESS ASSOCIATION, QUILL AND SCROLL, AND TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS _____________ Rani Gupta David M. Zionts Nathan P. Lange Counsel of Record COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Patricio Martínez-Llompart 3000 El Camino Real Ethan A. Sachs 5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor Sarah Suwanda Palo Alto, CA 94306 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Counsel for Amici Curiae One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street NW Michael C. Hiestand Washington, DC 20001 STUDENT PRESS LAW CENTER (202) 662-6000 1608 Rhode Island Avenue NW [email protected] Suite 211 Counsel for Amici Curiae Washington, DC 20036 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Student Press Law Center March 31, 2021 Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Cover S. Mark Goodman Theresa Chmara CENTER FOR SCHOLASTIC FREEDOM TO READ JOURNALISM FOUNDATION KENT STATE UNIVERSITY 225 N. Michigan Ave. 201D Franklin Hall Suite 1300 P.O. Box 5190 Chicago, IL 60601 Kent, OH 42242 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Counsel for Amicus Curiae Freedom to Read Center for Scholastic Foundation Journalism i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii INTEREST OF THE AMICI CURIAE ...................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...................................................
  • The Long Search for a Surgical Strike Precision Munitions and the Revolution in Military Affairs

    The Long Search for a Surgical Strike Precision Munitions and the Revolution in Military Affairs

    After you have read the research report, please give us your frank opinion on the contents. All comments––large or small, complimentary or caustic––will be gratefully appreciated. Mail them to CADRE/AR, Building 1400, 401 Chennault Circle, Maxwell AFB AL 36112–6428. The Long Search for Mets a Surgical Strike Precision Munitions and the Revolution in Military Affairs Cut along dotted line Thank you for your assistance ............................................................................................... ......... COLLEGE OF AEROSPACE DOCTRINE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION AIR UNIVERSITY The Long Search for a Surgical Strike Precision Munitions and the Revolution in Military Affairs DAVID R. METS, PhD School of Advanced Airpower Studies CADRE Paper No. 12 Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6615 October 2001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mets, David R. The long search for a surgical strike : precision munitions and the revolution in military affairs / David R. Mets. p. cm. -- (CADRE paper ; no. 12) — ISSN 1537-3371 At head of title: College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, Air University. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-58566-096-5 1. Air power--History. 2. Air power--United States. 3. Precision guided munitions-- History. 4. Precision guided munitions--United States. I. Title. II. CADRE paper ; 12. UG630 .M37823 2001 359'00973--dc21 2001045987 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not
  • The Legacies of the 19Th Amendment

    The Legacies of the 19Th Amendment

    LAW DAY 2020 Social Movement Changing America: The Legacies of the 19th Amendment 1 APRIL 30, 2020 Social Movement Changing America: The Legacies of the 19th Amendment The American Bar Association Division for Public Education and the Law Library of Congress, present the Law Day 2020 public program, “Social Movement Changing America: The Legacies of the 19th Amendment.” The national theme for Law Day 2020 is “Your Vote, Your Voice, Our Democracy: The 19th Amendment at 100.” In 2020, we are commemorating the centennial of the ratification of this transformative constitutional amendment. Framing Questions 1. How did the women’s suffrage movement and ratification of the 19th Amendment change America—constitutionally, legally, politically, socially, culturally, domestically? 2. How have American women fought for civil and political rights, including the vote, through the power of their voices and their actions? 3. How are matters of race and racism, class and subordination, all integral to the story of the 19th Amendment and its legacies? 4. How did the women’s suffrage movement inspire subsequent social movements for constitutional change? How might it continue to do so? 5. How does constitutional change happen? How has it? Will it ever again be accomplished through formal Article V amendment? 6. What did the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution accomplish? When did it do so? Have the goals and aspirations of its advocates been fully realized? 7. Why—and how—should we commemorate the centennial of the 19th Amendment? Why does it (still) matter? 1 2020 LAW DAY VIRTUAL PROGRAM PRESIDING Judy Perry Martinez President American Bar Association WELCOME Jane Sánchez Law Librarian of Congress MODERATOR Kimberly Atkins Senior News Correspondent, WBUR-Boston and Contributor, MSNBC PANELISTS Martha S.
  • Air Force Strategic Planning: Past, Present, and Future

    Air Force Strategic Planning: Past, Present, and Future

    C O R P O R A T I O N Air Force Strategic Planning Past, Present, and Future Raphael S. Cohen For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1765 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9697-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface For a relatively young service, the U.S. Air Force has a remarkably rich intellectual history. Even before the Air Force’s official formation, the development of airpower has been dotted with such visionaries as Billy Mitchell and Henry “Hap” Arnold.
  • The Vital Link the Tanker’S Role in Winning America’S Wars

    The Vital Link the Tanker’S Role in Winning America’S Wars

    AIR UNIVERSITY LIBRARY The Vital Link The Tanker’s Role in Winning America’s Wars DAVID M. COHEN Major, USAF Fairchild Paper Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6615 March 2001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cohen, David M., 1965– The vital link : the tanker’s role in winning America’s wars / David M. Cohen. p. cm. “Fairchild paper.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-088-4 1. KC-135 (Tanker aircraft). 2. Airtankers (Military science—United States. I. Title. UG1242.T36.C65 2001 358.4’183—dc21 00-054834 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. This Fairchild Paper, and others in the series, is available electronically at the Air University Research web site http://research.maxwell.af.mil under “Research Papers” then “Special Collections.” ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii PREFACE . ix ABSTRACT . xi RESEARCH STUDY LIMITATIONS . xiii 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 Notes . 2 2 STRATOTANKER HISTORY: COLD WAR TO DESERT HEAT . 3 The Tanker Goes Tactical: Vietnam . 4 Refueling across a Line in the Sand: Desert Storm . 6 Notes . 8 3 AGING TANKERS COME OF AGE: RECENT TANKER EXPERIENCE . 11 Velocity Equals Distance over Time . 12 Damn the Boneyard: Full Speed Ahead! . 13 Allied Force: The Tanker Shines . 16 Notes . 19 4 KC-135 FORCE STRUCTURE: WHEN TO SAY WHEN .