State of the Union Under Donald Trump Presidency: Problems, Policies and Prospects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State of the Union Under Donald Trump Presidency: Problems, Policies and Prospects Journal of Law and Judicial System Volume 2, Issue 1, 2019, PP 14-25 ISSN 2637-5893 (Online) State of the Union under Donald Trump Presidency: Problems, Policies and Prospects Komanduri S. Murty1, Tenora J. Simonez2 1,2 Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Valley State University, 1005 State University, Fort Valley, Georgia *Corresponding Author: Komanduri S. Murty, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Valley State University, Georgia. ABSTRACT On November 8, 2016 President-elect Donald Trump emerged as an unconventional, anti-establishment candidate and Washington outsider. On the campaign trail, he identified four major problems: economy, health care, immigration, and foreign policy under President Obama that he owed to fix if elected. He declared that our economy is choked by NAFTA, TPP, outsourcing and tax hikes. He called Obama care disastrous. He claimed our immigration policy was without borders and illegal immigration is out of control; and, as for our foreign policy, all nations around the world are laughing at us. He promised through his „Contract with America,‟ with a list of 18 policy measures, to turn the issues around in his first 100days and “make America great again.” This paper examines the problems, policies and prospects based on his presidential undertakings in the first month-and-a-half in the White House. Keywords: State of the Union, Trump Presidency, American Health Care Act, Affordable Care Act, Travel Ban, Executive Orders, protests, Russian connection. INTRODUCTION Sanders set their sights squarely on what mattered most to voters: a political economy in Donald Trump‟s victory as the 45th president of which elected officials strongly promoted a the United States attracted a variety of reactions broad-based prosperity that included them. from at home and abroad. Conservatives and Trump supporters were happy; liberals reacted That may be the case. But, anti-Trump with fear, frustration and anger; and, optimists protesters let their feelings be known via said that he deserves a chance (Hoilman 2016). protests and marches in several major cities like Some attributed his victory to a lack of enthusiasm Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Oakland, Portland, for Hillary Clinton, the Electoral College, low voter Seattle, Washington, D.C.; and at college campuses turnout, and Russian propaganda (Krieg 2016). in California, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania Others gave credit to his focus on the political (Mele and Correal 2016). Democratic senators economy. vowed to stand up to Trump‟s bigotry, if it continued. For example, Massachusetts Senator For example, Robert Johnson, Senior Fellow Elizabeth Warren made her position on Trump and Director of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt bigotry clear (Silva 2016: Para 3): Institute (2017: Para 2) wrote: We will stand up to bigotry. No compromises Trump won by challenging the credibility of ever on this one. Bigotry in all its forms. We will both the political and academic establishments, fight back against attacks on Latinos, on African relentlessly highlighting discrepancies between Americans, on women‟s, on Muslims, on their depiction of the United States‟ political immigrants, on disabled Americans, on anyone. economy and the reality that many voters Whether Donald Trump sits in a glass tower or experienced. Like Bernie Sanders in the sits in the White House, we will not give an inch Democratic primary, he started drawing large on this, not now, not ever. crowds by breaking ranks with his party‟s mainstream. While Hillary Clinton and Some Republicans, who were „never Trump Republican rivals such as Jeb Bush and Marco conservatives‟ like George H.W. Bush, Mitt Rubio tried to build coalitions based on cultural Romney, Ben Sasse, Mike Lee, and Bill Kristol, issues and partisan traditions, Trump and to list a few, rapidly switched to support post- Journal of Law and Judicial System V2 ● I1 ● 2019 14 State of the Union under Donald Trump Presidency: Problems, Policies and Prospects election Trump (Sheffield 2016), perhaps due to only won 306 electoral votes, which is a smaller his growing popularity at the time. In an early number than George H. W. Bush (426 in 1988), tracking poll conducted by Politico.com during Bill Clinton (370 in 1992 and 379 in 1996) or November 16-18, 2016,46 percent of 1,885 Obama (365 in 2008).(2) On February 10, 2017, registered voters surveyed viewed president- Trump said that thousands of people were elect Trump very favorably or somewhat “brought in on buses” from Massachusetts to favorably—higher than the majority leader vote illegally in New Hampshire, which was Mitch McConnell (21%), house speaker Paul also reported by the Associated Press; but Ryan (38%), Republicans in Congress (39%), or officials at New Hampshire‟s secretary of state, Democrats in Congress (42%). Although US Attorney‟s Office, Massachusetts‟s attorney Trump‟s popularity did not change by a big general‟s office said there was no evidence to margin (stayed within a range of 4 percent in support Trump‟s claim. (3) On February 7, most polls) since his inauguration on January 2017, Trump told a group of US sheriffs that the 20, 2016, people seemed to be increasingly murder rate in the U.S. was the “highest it‟s worried that his actions will divide the country been in 45-47 years,” though the 2015 FBI further. In a Quinnipiac poll of 1,155 voters statistics show that the US murder rate is nearly during February 2-6, 2017, 58 percent said that at an all-time low at 5 homicides per 100,000 Donald Trump would do more to divide the persons. (4) On January 26, 2017, the day after country, rather than unite the nation; and, 64 he signed an executive order to extend a wall percent said that they were very or somewhat along the southern border and insisted that dissatisfied with the way things were going in Mexico would pay for it. Trump said that he and the nation, at least in part, because of his Mexico‟s president agreed to cancel a meeting, personal qualities: not honest (52%), does not but hours later, Pena Nieto tweeted that he have good leadership skills (50%), does not care called the White House to cancel the meeting about average Americans (52%), not level- because of his disagreement over building a wall headed (60%), and does not share their values (For a complete list of Trump‟s lies from the (58%). Gender-wise, 58 percent of women day after his inauguration, see Georgantopoulos voters disapprove of his job performance, 2017). Additionally, Trump aids like White compared to only 36 percent of their male House Press Secretary, Sean Spicer and counterparts (Quinnipiac University 2017). Counselor Kellyanne Conway also joined in Furthermore, Americans find it hard to escape making false claims in varying degrees (see from media-saturated news and interviews Bobic 2017). “The man who boasts that he focused on the ever-mounting controversies of habitually tells the truth is simply a man with no his “America First” foreign policy, his infamous respect for it,” said Henry Louis Mencken travel-ban executive order on immigration, his (1922:274). claims of Obama administration wiretapping Leaks Trump Tower phones, and the Russian involvement in presidential elections, whether Leaks are the unauthorized disclosures. Clearly, they are at a public gatherings, at work places, they pose problems, especially if they are big or at private parties. Thus, Trump‟s presidency ones. Durden (2017) listed the 10 biggest leaks to date, for the most part, is a combination of of the Trump presidency. Of them, the following noise and signals (Cohen 2017). three appear to be the most significant in terms of their impact on the President and his PROBLEMS administration: First,a draft memo from Problems of Trump‟s presidency can broadly be Secretary John Kelly, dated January 25, 2017, categorized into four: lies, leaks, lawsuits, and regarding Implementing the President‟s Border chaos. Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies. The 11-page memo Lies covered: (A) Policies regarding the apprehension A lie, in general terms, is a statement that and detention of aliens described in Section 235 contradicts a known or verifiable fact. Here are of the INA; (B) Hiring more border patrol some selective recent examples that took agents; (c) Identifying and quantifying sources considerable amount of debate media time: (1) of aid to Mexico; (D) Expansion of the 287(g) On February 16, 2017, when Trump said that he program to include state guard units in the won most electoral college votes since Ronald border region; (E) Commissioning a Reagan, a reporter at the news conference comprehensive study of border security; (F) quickly contradicted with factual data that he Border wall construction and funding; (G) Journal of Law and Judicial System V2 ● I1 ● 2019 15 State of the Union under Donald Trump Presidency: Problems, Policies and Prospects Expanding expedited removal pursuant to members in the gallery, when Trump addressed section 235(b)(1)(A)(III)(I) of the INA; (H) joint session of Congress on March 1, 2017. Implementing the provisions of section Democratic and some Republican law makers 235(b)(2)(c) of the INA to return arriving aliens demanded an emergency briefing (Fandos 2017; to contiguous countries; (I) Restoring integrity Kight 2017; Schmitt and Sanger 2017). to asylum referrals and credible fear Thus, if the president is unable to contain these determinations pursuant to section 235(b)(I) of leaks effectively, whistleblowers may use the INA; (J) Allocation of resources and selective leaks to make sure that people know personnel to the southern border for detention of what is really going on inside the White House. aliens and adjudication of claims; (K) Proper Trump‟s anger, name-calling, and blaming of use of parole authority pursuant to section Obama loyalists is apparently not helping to 212(d)(5) of the INA; (L) Proper processing and stop these leaks.
Recommended publications
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage
    Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage Aaron Joseph Johnson Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Aaron Joseph Johnson All rights reserved ABSTRACT Jazz and Radio in the United States: Mediation, Genre, and Patronage Aaron Joseph Johnson This dissertation is a study of jazz on American radio. The dissertation's meta-subjects are mediation, classification, and patronage in the presentation of music via distribution channels capable of reaching widespread audiences. The dissertation also addresses questions of race in the representation of jazz on radio. A central claim of the dissertation is that a given direction in jazz radio programming reflects the ideological, aesthetic, and political imperatives of a given broadcasting entity. I further argue that this ideological deployment of jazz can appear as conservative or progressive programming philosophies, and that these tendencies reflect discursive struggles over the identity of jazz. The first chapter, "Jazz on Noncommercial Radio," describes in some detail the current (circa 2013) taxonomy of American jazz radio. The remaining chapters are case studies of different aspects of jazz radio in the United States. Chapter 2, "Jazz is on the Left End of the Dial," presents considerable detail to the way the music is positioned on specific noncommercial stations. Chapter 3, "Duke Ellington and Radio," uses Ellington's multifaceted radio career (1925-1953) as radio bandleader, radio celebrity, and celebrity DJ to examine the medium's shifting relationship with jazz and black American creative ambition.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Report
    FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 2, 2017 BY Amy Mitchell, Jeffrey Gottfried, Galen Stocking, Katerina Matsa and Elizabeth M. Grieco FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research Rachel Weisel, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, October, 2017, “Covering President Trump in a Polarized Media Environment” 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. © Pew Research Center 2017 www.pewresearch.org 3 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Table of Contents About Pew Research Center 2 Table of Contents 3 Covering President Trump in a Polarized Media Environment 4 1. Coverage from news outlets with a right-leaning audience cited fewer source types, featured more positive assessments than coverage from other two groups 14 2. Five topics accounted for two-thirds of coverage in first 100 days 25 3. A comparison to early coverage of past
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo | ISSF POLICY Series America and the World—2017 and Beyond
    H-Diplo | ISSF POLICY Series America and the World—2017 and Beyond Fractured: Trump’s Foreign Policy after Two Years Essay by David C. Hendrickson, Colorado College Published on 29 January 2019 | issforum.org Editor: Diane Labrosse Web and Production Editor: George Fujii Shortlink: http://tiny.cc/PR-1-5BN Permalink: http://issforum.org/roundtables/policy/1-5BN-fractured PDF URL: http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/Policy-Roundtable-1-5BN.pdf he presidency of Donald Trump is the strangest act in American history; unprecedented in form, in style an endless sequence of improvisations and malapropisms.1 But in substance there is continuity, probably much more than is customarily recognized. It is hard to recognize the continuity, amid the Tdaily meltd owns (and biennial shutdowns), but it exists. In large measure Trump has been a Republican president, carrying out a Republican agenda. His attack on the regulatory agencies follows a Republican script. His call for a prodigious boost to military spending, combined with sharp cuts in taxes, has been the Republican program since the time of Ronald Reagan’s presidency. His climate skepticism corresponds with that of Republican leaders in Congress. On trade and immigration, Trump has departed most radically from Bush Republicanism, but even in that regard Trump’s policies harken back to older traditions in the Grand Old Party. He is different in character and temperament from every Republican predecessor as president, yet has attached himself to much of the traditional Republican program.2 It is in foreign policy, the subject of this essay, where Trump’s role has been most disorienting, his performance ‘up-ending’ in substance and method.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Brief
    No. 20-255 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____________ MAHANOY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, V. B.L., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER FATHER LAWRENCE LEVY AND HER MOTHER BETTY LOU LEVY, _____________ Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit _____________ BRIEF OF THE STUDENT PRESS LAW CENTER, ASSOCIATED COLLEGIATE PRESS, CENTER FOR SCHOLASTIC JOURNALISM, FREEDOM TO READ FOUNDATION, JOURNALISM EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL SCHOLASTIC PRESS ASSOCIATION, QUILL AND SCROLL, AND TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS _____________ Rani Gupta David M. Zionts Nathan P. Lange Counsel of Record COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Patricio Martínez-Llompart 3000 El Camino Real Ethan A. Sachs 5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor Sarah Suwanda Palo Alto, CA 94306 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Counsel for Amici Curiae One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street NW Michael C. Hiestand Washington, DC 20001 STUDENT PRESS LAW CENTER (202) 662-6000 1608 Rhode Island Avenue NW [email protected] Suite 211 Counsel for Amici Curiae Washington, DC 20036 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Student Press Law Center March 31, 2021 Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Cover S. Mark Goodman Theresa Chmara CENTER FOR SCHOLASTIC FREEDOM TO READ JOURNALISM FOUNDATION KENT STATE UNIVERSITY 225 N. Michigan Ave. 201D Franklin Hall Suite 1300 P.O. Box 5190 Chicago, IL 60601 Kent, OH 42242 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Counsel for Amicus Curiae Freedom to Read Center for Scholastic Foundation Journalism i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii INTEREST OF THE AMICI CURIAE ...................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacies of the 19Th Amendment
    LAW DAY 2020 Social Movement Changing America: The Legacies of the 19th Amendment 1 APRIL 30, 2020 Social Movement Changing America: The Legacies of the 19th Amendment The American Bar Association Division for Public Education and the Law Library of Congress, present the Law Day 2020 public program, “Social Movement Changing America: The Legacies of the 19th Amendment.” The national theme for Law Day 2020 is “Your Vote, Your Voice, Our Democracy: The 19th Amendment at 100.” In 2020, we are commemorating the centennial of the ratification of this transformative constitutional amendment. Framing Questions 1. How did the women’s suffrage movement and ratification of the 19th Amendment change America—constitutionally, legally, politically, socially, culturally, domestically? 2. How have American women fought for civil and political rights, including the vote, through the power of their voices and their actions? 3. How are matters of race and racism, class and subordination, all integral to the story of the 19th Amendment and its legacies? 4. How did the women’s suffrage movement inspire subsequent social movements for constitutional change? How might it continue to do so? 5. How does constitutional change happen? How has it? Will it ever again be accomplished through formal Article V amendment? 6. What did the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution accomplish? When did it do so? Have the goals and aspirations of its advocates been fully realized? 7. Why—and how—should we commemorate the centennial of the 19th Amendment? Why does it (still) matter? 1 2020 LAW DAY VIRTUAL PROGRAM PRESIDING Judy Perry Martinez President American Bar Association WELCOME Jane Sánchez Law Librarian of Congress MODERATOR Kimberly Atkins Senior News Correspondent, WBUR-Boston and Contributor, MSNBC PANELISTS Martha S.
    [Show full text]
  • Npr Tiny Desk Concert Tickets
    Npr Tiny Desk Concert Tickets Abel calumniated his prochronism comments indigently, but contracted Teodorico never scintillate so temporizingly. Disobedient and palaeontological Moishe evaginated some monardas so furioso! Unmailable and pondering Edsel trounced almost capriccioso, though Richie interleaves his thermolysis notarized. Go ahead with key company, and reserved seating charts and concert tickets are a tastemaker and cnn account to do not produce or not been giving us the impeachment trial Is NPR part of PBS? How do federal get worse your assign station PBS. It mean for tiny desk concert tickets with an idea of npr station listenership data object is simpler than an image. 93 KPCC Southern California Public Radio. NPR's Tiny Desk Contest on private Road Events Calendar The. Since 200 National Public community has hosted an arch live conversation series called Tiny Desk Concerts which features artists from all genres of. Sam herring to translate our online tickets being voted npr wants to end of the population register of the department of great if he sings yoruba music? The homicide Desk is kept unique note that presents your favorite artists like you've later heard everything before. Future Islands Tiny beloved Home Concert 905 WESA. Harry Styles Performs 'Fine Line' Songs at NPR's Tiny Desk Concert It just feels like kept'm in secular way above you say so I apologize singer told the. This tiny desk concert tickets for concerts. 30 NPR Tiny Desk Concerts ideas tiny desks music concert. From he mind of veteran comedian and NPR pledge drive enthusiast Dylan Carey comes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Sources of Funding for Public Broadcasting Stations
    Alternative Sources of Funding for Public Broadcasting Stations This report is provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) in response to the Conference Report accompanying the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 (H.R. 2055). June 20, 2012 Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 II. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 III. The Role of Public Broadcasting in the United States ...................................................5 Mission.................................................................................................................... 6 The Role of CPB ...................................................................................................... 8 Education ................................................................................................................ 8 Local Service and Engagement .............................................................................. 11 Serving the Underserved ....................................................................................... 12 News and Public Affairs ......................................................................................... 13 History, Science and Cultural Content .................................................................. 15 IV. The Organizational Structure of Public
    [Show full text]
  • CQR Future of The
    Published by CQ Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc. www.cqresearcher.com future of the GOP Can Republicans gain more minority support? he immediate future appears promising for the Re - publican Party: It is in strong shape to reclaim the majority in the Senate in November, gaining control T of both chambers of Congress, and it commands many state governments. But political observers say the GOP should be concerned about the longer term, developing policies that can entice greater numbers of women, minorities and young people. Analysts also say the party must resolve its internal battles between the moderate Republican establishment and more conser - vative tea party wing. At the same time, nonpartisan scholars say, Rep. Rand Paul, R-Ky., a potential 2016 GOP Republicans must shed the identity they have acquired as the un - presidential candidate, has courted black voters in an attempt to expand the party’s appeal. He criticizes Republicans who support voting restrictions that compromising and confrontat ional “party of no.” The party’s grow - affect minority voters. At left is tea party advocate Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn., who ing conservative bent has driven away many independent voters, unsuccessfully sought the 2012 GOP presidential nomination. who are crucial to winning presidential elections. The 2016 contest for the white House is seen as critical in determining whether Re - I publicans can assemble a diverse coalition beyond their traditional THIS REPORT N base of older whites. THE ISSUES ....................891 S BACKGROUND ................897 I CHRONOLOGY ................899 D CURRENT SITUATION ........904 E CQ Researcher • Oct. 24, 2014 • www.cqresearcher.com AT ISSUE ........................905 Volume 24, Number 38 • Pages 889-912 OUTLOOK ......................906 RECIPIENT Of SOCIETY Of PROfESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AwARD fOR BIBLIOGRAPHY ................910 EXCELLENCE u AmERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SILvER GAvEL AwARD THE NEXT STEP ..............911 fUTURE Of THE GOP Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disinformation Age
    Steven Livingston W. LanceW. Bennett EDITED BY EDITED BY Downloaded from terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997THE DISINFORMATION AGE https://www.cambridge.org/core Politics, and Technology, Disruptive Communication in the United States the United in https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms . IP address: 170.106.202.126 . , on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36 , subject to the Cambridge Core Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997 The Disinformation Age The intentional spread of falsehoods – and attendant attacks on minorities, press freedoms, and the rule of law – challenge the basic norms and values upon which institutional legitimacy and political stability depend. How did we get here? The Disinformation Age assembles a remarkable group of historians, political scientists, and communication scholars to examine the historical and political origins of the post-fact information era, focusing on the United States but with lessons for other democracies. Bennett and Livingston frame the book by examining decades-long efforts by political and business interests to undermine authoritative institutions, including parties, elections, public agencies, science, independent journalism, and civil society groups. The other distinguished scholars explore the historical origins and workings of disinformation, along with policy challenges and the role of the legacy press in improving public communication. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. W. Lance Bennett is Professor of Political Science and Ruddick C.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow Rain” Controversy: Lessons for Arms Control Compliance
    JONATHAN B. TUCKER The “Yellow Rain” Controversy: Lessons for Arms Control Compliance JONATHAN B. TUCKER Since March 1996, Jonathan B. Tucker has directed the Chemical and Biological Weapons Nonproliferation Program at the Monterey Institute’s Center for Nonproliferation Studies. During the 1999-2000 academic year, he was a Visiting Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He edited the recent book Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons (MIT Press, 2000). uring a speech to the Berlin Press Association warfare threat.2 The U.S. allegation also implied that the on September 13, 1981, U.S. Secretary of State Soviet Union was violating both the 1925 Geneva Pro- DAlexander Haig made a dramatic allegation. He tocol banning the use in war of chemical and biological accused the Soviet Union of supplying mycotoxins— weapons and the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons poisonous compounds synthesized by fungi—to its Viet- Convention prohibiting the development, production, namese and Laotian Communist allies for military use stockpiling, and transfer of biological and toxin warfare against resistance forces in Laos and Cambodia agents.3 Nearly 20 years later, controversy still surrounds (Kampuchea), and of employing the same agents in com- the U.S. government’s claim of Soviet noncompliance. bat operations in Afghanistan. “For some time now,” Secretary Haig’s allegation was based on a variety of Haig said, evidence compiled by the Working Group on Chemi- the international community has been alarmed cal/Biological Warfare Use, a task force of analysts from by continuing reports that the Soviet Union and several U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Media's Influence on the Republican
    Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-96, July 2015 “They Don’t Give a Damn about Governing” Conservative Media’s Influence on the Republican Party by Jackie Calmes Joan Shorenstein Fellow, Spring 2015 National Correspondent, The New York Times 1 Table of Contents 1. Overview 3 2. Media Pioneers of the Right 13 3. The Second Generation 18 4. “Conservative-Industrial Complex” 24 5. Messengers of the Left 29 6. Setting the Agenda: “Ugly” Debut of the Republican Congress 33 7. Setting the Agenda: Common Core 40 8. Agenda Setter – Steve Deace 45 9. Diagnosis: “Epistemic Closure” – “Untethered from Reality”? 50 10. Endnotes 54 11. Appendix A: Conservative Internet Sites 60 12. Appendix B: Political Slant of Top Talk Radio Hosts 63 13. Appendix C: Common Core Coverage and Commentary 66 14. Acknowledgements 68 2 Overview Republicans should still have been celebrating in late January 2015. Only weeks earlier they had opened the 114th Congress with a Senate majority for the first time in eight years, as well as a fattened majority in the House, where they had ruled since 2011 – full control of the legislative branch for the first time in Barack Obama’s presidency. Yet in reality, Republicans were out of control. They only had themselves to blame, and many did. So unhappy was Representative Charlie Dent, a six-term Pennsylvanian and one of the few surviving Republican moderates, he emerged from a private party caucus in January to share with reporters waiting outside the complaint he had made to colleagues behind closed doors: “Week one, we had a speaker election that did not go as well as a lot of us would have liked.
    [Show full text]