DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Mott MacDonald Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Gibson Drive Kings Hill West Malling Kent ME19 4LZ Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report August 2006 227741/01/A - August 2006/ P:\Cambridge\Demeter - Daedalus\WEM\PROJECTS\227741_Tonbridge-Malling_SFRA\F_Reports\Stage_2\Final_figures\Stage 2 Report_TMBC_SFRA.doc/DS Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Mott MacDonald Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report. 227741/01/A - August 2006/ P:\Cambridge\Demeter - Daedalus\WEM\PROJECTS\227741_Tonbridge-Malling_SFRA\F_Reports\Stage_2\Final_figures\Stage 2 Report_TMBC_SFRA.doc/DS Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Mott MacDonald Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report Glossary AOD Above Ordnance Datum DSM Digital Surface Model DTM Digital Terrain Model EA Environment Agency EFO Extreme Flood Outline FEH Flood Estimation Handbook FRA Flood Risk Assessment FSR Flood Studies Report FW Foul Water GIS Geographical Information System IFM Indicative Flood Map IFSAR Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar LAMP Local Asset Management Plan LiDAR Light Detection and Ranging NFCDD National Flood and Coastal Defence Database OS Ordnance Survey PPG25 Planning Policy Guidance Note 25 PPS25 Planning Policy Statement 25 QMED Median Annual Maximum Flood (m³/s) SAR Synthetic Aperture Radar SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SoP Standard of Protection SuDS Sustainable Drainage Systems SW Surface Water T&MBC Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council WwTW Wastewater Treatment Works Acknowledgement: All data provided by the Environment Agency which has been used in the compilation of this report remains the property of the Environment Agency and must not be relied on or used for any other project without the prior written authority of the Environment Agency being obtained. i 227741/01/A - August 2006/S-1 of 4 P:\Cambridge\Demeter - Daedalus\WEM\PROJECTS\227741_Tonbridge-Malling_SFRA\F_Reports\Stage_2\Final_figures\Stage 2 Report_TMBC_SFRA.doc/DS Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Mott MacDonald Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report Contents List 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Study Objectives 1-1 1.2 Government Avice on Flood Risk 1-1 1.3 Primary Purpose of the SFRA 1-2 1.4 SFRA Stages 1-2 2 SFRA Background Information 2-5 2.1 Data Collection and Verification 2-5 2.2 Interface with other Flood Risk Products 2-5 2.2.1 Differences between Agency Flood Zone Maps and SFRA Maps 2-5 2.2.2 The Extreme Flood Outline 2-6 2.3 Project Outputs 2-6 2.4 Flood Zones - General Criteria 2-8 2.4.1 Zone 2 / Zone 3 Boundary 2-8 2.4.2 Zone 1 / Zone 2 Boundary 2-9 2.4.3 Zone 3c – Functional Floodplain 2-9 2.4.4 Flood Risk Assessments for Individual Development Proposals 2-9 2.5 Climate Change 2-10 3 Ground Surface Data 3-11 3.1 Photogrammetry Data 3-11 3.2 Ground Survey Data 3-11 3.3 Aerial Photography 3-12 4 Flood Defences 4-15 4.1 General 4-15 4.2 Leigh Barrier Operation 4-16 4.2.1 Automatic Control 4-16 4.2.2 Leigh Barrier Operating Procedure 4-16 5 Main River Data 5-18 5.1 Medway Catchment 5-18 5.2 Other Watercourses 5-19 5.3 Gas Works Stream 5-19 5.4 Botany Stream 5-19 5.5 Mill Stream 5-19 5.6 Hilden Brook and Hawden Stream 5-19 5.7 Hydraulic Modelling 5-20 5.8 River Medway Flood Risk Mapping, Phase 3 Study, 2004 5-21 5.8.1 Model Approach 5-21 5.8.2 Calibration 5-21 ii 227741/01/A - August 2006/S-2 of 4 P:\Cambridge\Demeter - Daedalus\WEM\PROJECTS\227741_Tonbridge-Malling_SFRA\F_Reports\Stage_2\Final_figures\Stage 2 Report_TMBC_SFRA.doc/DS Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Mott MacDonald Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report 5.8.3 Flood Mapping 5-22 5.9 Modifications to River Medway, Phase 3 Study, 2006 5-23 5.9.1 Model Approach 5-23 5.9.2 Leigh Barrier Inflow 5-24 5.9.3 Calibration 5-25 5.9.4 Interpretation in the vicinity of Control Structures 5-27 5.9.5 Flood Mapping 5-30 5.10 Medway SFRA 5-31 5.10.1 Modelling Approach 5-31 5.10.2 Boundary Conditions 5-31 5.10.3 Calibration 5-31 5.10.4 Flood extent 5-32 6 Tonbridge 6-33 6.1 Flood Risk Areas - Tonbridge Town. 6-34 6.1.1 Tonbridge Flow Paths 6-35 6.2 Potential Re-Development in Tonbridge 6-36 6.3 Flood Risk Zones - West of Tonbridge 6-37 7 Aylesford 7-39 8 Limitations 8-40 9 Flood Risk Management, Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 9-41 9.1 Introduction 9-41 9.2 Aims of Management, Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 9-41 9.2.1 Generic Risk Management Measures 9-42 Appendices Appendix A References 10-47 Appendix B Sequential Test 10-48 Appendix C Tonbridge Figures 10-51 Appendix D Aylesford Figures 10-62 Appendix E Modelling limitations 10-66 iii 227741/01/A - August 2006/S-3 of 4 P:\Cambridge\Demeter - Daedalus\WEM\PROJECTS\227741_Tonbridge-Malling_SFRA\F_Reports\Stage_2\Final_figures\Stage 2 Report_TMBC_SFRA.doc/DS Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Mott MacDonald Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report List of Figures Figure 1.1: Constraints 1-3 Figure 1.2: Location Plan 1-4 Figure 3.1: Area covered by Photogrammetry 3-13 Figure 3.2: Survey Location Plan (Tonbridge) 3-14 Figure 4.1: Flood Defences 4-17 Figure 5.1: Calibration of Model at Town Lock Tonbridge: Oct 2000 event 5-26 Figure 5.2: Schematic of flows path through Tonbridge from the Medway Model Phase 3 5-28 Figure 5.3: Schematic to Illustrate Flood Flow Paths of the revised model through Tonbridge. 5-29 Figure 6.1: Flood Extent on 13 October 2000 (looking north-west from east Tonbridge) 6-38 Figure 6.2: Flood Extent on 13 October 2000 (looking north-west) 6-38 Figure C.1: Tonbridge Centre: Defended 100-year outline 10-52 Figure C.2: Tonbridge Centre: Defended 1 in 100 year outline : Graduated risk zones 10-53 Figure C.3: Tonbridge Centre: Defended 1 in 10-year outline with climate change: Functional Floodplain 10-54 Figure C.4: Tonbridge Centre: Defended 1 in 100-year outline with climate change 10-55 Figure C.5: Tonbridge Centre: Flood Zone 3 and Flood Zone 2 10-56 Figure C.6: Tonbridge Development Quarters 10-57 Figure C.7: West Tonbridge – Defended 1 in 100-year outline 10-58 Figure C.8: West Tonbridge: Defended 1 in 100-year outline with Graduated flood risk 10-59 Figure C.9: West Tonbridge: Defended 1 in 10 year outline including climate change 10-60 Figure C.10: West Tonbridge: Flood Zone 3 and Flood Zone 2 10-61 Figure D.1: Aylesford: Defended 1 in 200-year and 1 in 1000-year outlines 10-63 Figure D.2: Aylesford: Defended 1 in 200-year outline with climate change 10-64 Figure D.3: Aylesford: Flood Zone 3 and Flood Zone 2 10-65 Table Table 2.1: Flood Risk Zones in PPG 25...............................................................................................2-8 iv 227741/01/A - August 2006/S-4 of 4 P:\Cambridge\Demeter - Daedalus\WEM\PROJECTS\227741_Tonbridge-Malling_SFRA\F_Reports\Stage_2\Final_figures\Stage 2 Report_TMBC_SFRA.doc/DS Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Mott MacDonald Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Stage 2 Report 1 Introduction 1.1 Study Objectives The Environment Agency (EA) and Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (T&MBC) have jointly commissioned Mott MacDonald to carry out a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, (SFRA). The focus of the study areas was selected after the application of a sequential test as described in Planning Policy Guidance Note 25: Development and Flood Risk (PPG25)1. The sequential test used a multi-tiered approach to inform the draft future spatial strategy2 for Tonbridge and Malling Borough, see Appendix B. The key planning constraints identified as part of the sequential test can be seen in Figure 1.2 The outcome of the sequential test found that virtually all of the future residential growth, which is anticipated to take place within the Borough during the next 15 years, outside of Tonbridge central area, will be in locations at no risk from flooding. However, in order to deliver key national, regional and local sustainable development objectives, particularly in relation to town centres and to respond to the outputs of local baseline studies, the test found that for some required development no reasonable options are available in Flood Zones 1 or 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Display PDF in Separate
    LIBRARY- Qjiu44lfc*)4P4iUIj4U^* Environment Agency W 3' local environment agency plan MEDWAY NOVEMBER 1999 ▼ ▼ E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Medway LEAP Map 1 lorthfleet E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Gravesend Strood Catchment Overview Meopham Chatham The Medway Catchment Snodland Kent Area Catchment boundary Watercourse Borough Built up area Green Harrietshai Bewl Water, Wadhurst' Produced from Ordnance Survey Maps under licence granted by the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office 10km licence No GD0J177G0005 © Ordnance Survey 1998 This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below. Environment Agency FOREWORD Welcome to the Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) for the Medway Catchment. This LEAP examines issues specific to the catchment in support of the more strategic and broader-based issues identified in the Kent Area LEAP. One of the fundamental objectives of the LEAP process is to involve all interested parties in working with the Agency in planning for the future well being of the local environment, ensuring decisions on the future management of the LEAP area are based on a range of views from interested parties. As a result, this document has been produced after public consultation following the launch of the Consultation Draft in February 1999. We are grateful to the many people who responded to the draft document. Their comments have enabled us to evaluate the issues raised in the original report and refine them into an action plan framework which sets out the work that the Agency intends to carry out in the Catchment in partnership with others over the next 5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cuckmere River
    ■ NRA Southern 31 THE CUCKMERE RIVER NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region Guardians of the Water Environment THE CUCKMERE RIVER COURSE ITie many rivulets which form the headwaters of the Cuckmere River rise 20 miles from the coast in the Heathfield ridgeway. From this southern ridge of the high Weald, some 130 metres above sea level, streamlets combine to form the major headstreams. The true source of the Cuckmere rises in the north of Heathfield Park, just below the ridge road. It feeds the lakes of the park and then flows south. 'Phe name Cuckmere is a Saxon word meaning “fast flowing water” perhaps reflecting that in its 7 kilometres, the river falls 100 metres. It collects first the Flitterbrook from the east and next the Waldron Gill from Horam and Vines Cross to the west. The river then hooks westward, towards its " ' T T 1! -^vci uic n u u ic s, longshore drift ( the tendency for shingle to be driven from west to east by the prevailing south west winds ) had forced the mouth of the river eastwards. The shingle bar formed by the drift forced the river against the first of the Seven Sisters until it blocked the mouth. The river was then obliged to break through at a new point and spit formation began again. In 1946, man intervened. A straight cut was made to bypass the meanders of the tidal river. This lessened flooding in the valley and gave the river more strength to combat deposition. The banks of the new river mouth were secured by artificial embankments.
    [Show full text]
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Medway
    NRA Southern 36 THE RIVER MEDWAY National Rivers Authority Nat. Southern Region Infon Guardians of Head C ce the Water Environment Class N o .... 4,.. RWjl widens between Rochester HYDROLOGY THE and Sheerness until the River Medway flows into the Thames Estuary. The Wealden rivers respond rapidly to rainfall and extremes o f RIVER The total length o f the main flow may vary five-hundredfold between summer and winter. Medway from source to the There are six flow gauging stations on the main river, three on the Estuary at Sheerness is 110km River Eden and three on the River Teise. The Eridge Stream, the MEDWAY (70 miles). The river has a Bartley Mill Stream and the Rivers Bourne, Bewl and Beult are also catchment area o f 1400 sq km gauged. above the tidal limit and 402 There are three water supply reservoirs in the Medway catchment, COURSE AND sq km b elow the tidal limit. Bough Beech, W eir Wood and Bewl Water. GEOLOGY HISTORY RESERVOIR VOLUME DESIGN YIELD WATER AREA LOCATION (Ml) (Ml/d) (ha) The River Medway rises in the Ashdown Forest as a spring The name o f the river may Bough Beech 8,630 22.7 113 Tributary of issuing from the Tunbridge derive from a Celtic word, (East Surrey River Eden Wells Sands just above Turners Medu meaning mead, presum­ Water Company) Hill. The sands and clays of the ably signifying a river with High Weald dictate the charac­ “sweet” water. The Romans Weir Wood 5,623 14.1 113 Upper Medway (Southern Water ter o f the river, w hich w ith its called the river Fluminus Services Ltd.) many deeply incised tributaries, Meduwaeias and the Saxons contrasts sharply with the chalk knew it as the Medwaeg.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Risk and Impact Assessment for Kent and Medway
    Climate Change Risk and Impact Assessment for Kent and Medway Part 2: Agriculture Sector Summary November 2019 A. Agriculture Sector Summary A.1 Key characteristics Kent and Medway’s agricultural sector is nationally important to the United Kingdom and a major producer of fruit. In total, the agriculture sector accounts for two thirds of national tree grown fruit and one third of all strawberry production in the country. Although Kent and Medway have a significantly higher proportion of land devoted to fruit production than the rest of England, its rural economy is a mix of arable farming, animal husbandry, horticulture, viticulture, forestry, top (fruit grown on trees) and soft fruit production. For example, the best and most versatile land (ALC Grades 1, 2, and 3a) farmed in Swale is worth approximately £360 million at the current average market price for good quality arable land in England. It is estimated to support £105m– £255m of agricultural output each year1. Landowners also benefit from diversification initiatives, such as catchment sensitive farming (CSF), a national scheme to reduce water and air pollution from agriculture. The CSF initiatives cover most water management catchments in Kent and Medway including the Stour, Rother, Medway, and Darent catchments. Across the South East, CSF priority areas cover 528,600ha – 27% of total land area and 45% of agricultural land. The rural economy in Kent and Medway employs 46,000 people. With 12,957 farm workers, Kent has the fourth largest agricultural workforce in the country after Devon, North Yorkshire, and Lincolnshire. 40% of agricultural workers in Kent and Medway are employed as casual workers or employed for seasonal work, much higher than the national average of 14.6%2.
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Catchment Flood Management Plan Example Inception Study
    Booc_ 7^ , e a s o u t h e r n L _ vt > r o ^ ~ ) environm ent f g \ \ „ ._*■ n « n \G e n c #W Babtie Brown & Root Medway Catchment Flood Management Plan Example Inception Report BBR 7290066. Revision A01. November 2002 Babtie Brown and Root JV Simpson House, 6 Cherry Orchard Road, Croydon, Surrey. CR9 6BE Tel 020 8686 8212 Fax 020 8681 2499 E n v i r o n m e n t Babtie Brown & Root AGENCY Medway CFMP - Inception Report AM comment or representation relating to this document should be submitted by [date] to: Clive Older Environment Agency Southern Region, Kent Area Orchard House, Endeavour Park London Road Addington West Mailing Kent ME15 5SH 01732 875587 Environment Agency Client: Southern Region, Kent Area Office Agency Project Manager * Clive Older Consultants Babtie Brown & Root BBR document review and issue history BBR Project Number 7290066 Revision Status Issued to Date Author Reviewed by number R01 Revision draft N/A 30 October S Rumens AJ Burton 2002 A01 Approval draft Agency 21 November AJ Burton K Riddell Southern 2002 BBR No: 7290066. Revision A01. November 2002 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 125878 ENVIRONMENT ( K ) Babtie Brown & Root AGENCY ^ Medway CFMP - Inception Report Medway Catchment Flood Management Plan Example Inception Study Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUM M A RY...................................................................................................................1 2. BACKGROUND TO CATCHMENT FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLANS.......................................2 2.1 Purpose of the CFMP Inception report.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JBA Consulting Report Template 2015
    Maidstone Borough Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment – Addendum Report Final Report October 2016 Maidstone Borough Council Maidstone House King Street Maidstone Kent ME15 6JQ JBA Project Manager Ben Gibson JBA Consulting 35 Perrymount Road Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 3BW Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft v1 / June 2016 Draft addendum report, Cheryl Parks excluding updated climate (Maidstone Borough change information Council) Draft v2 / October 2016 Updates made following Cheryl Parks comments received from (Maidstone Borough Cheryl Parks on 12 July Council) 2016 Draft v3 / October 2016 Updates made following Cheryl Parks and draft comments raised by Adam Reynolds the Environment Agency (Maidstone Borough and received from Council) Maidstone Borough Council on 13 October 2016 Final v4 / October 2016 Updates made following Cheryl Parks and final comments raised by the Adam Reynolds Environment Agency and (Maidstone Borough received from Maidstone Council) Borough Council on 19 October 2016 Contract This report describes work commissioned by Maidstone Borough Council. The Council's representative for the contract was Cheryl Parks. Georgina Latus and Ben Gibson of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Georgina Latus BSc Technical Assistant ....................................................................... Ben Gibson BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Alastair Dale BSc PGDip MIAHR Director 2016s4269 - Maidstone SFRA Addendum - Final Report (v4 October 2016).docx i Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for Maidstone Borough Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landscape of Benenden
    THE LANDSCAPE OF BENENDEN Ernest Pollard and Hazel Strouts July 2006 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION __________________________________________________________________ 2 Location and size of the parish _____________________________________________________________2 Geology, topography and soils _____________________________________________________________3 I. THE HISTORY OF THE LANDSCAPE_____________________________________________ 4 Prehistoric and Roman periods_____________________________________________________________4 The dens _______________________________________________________________________________4 Lathes and hundreds _____________________________________________________________________5 Manors ________________________________________________________________________________5 The parish ______________________________________________________________________________6 Pattern of settlement in the Weald __________________________________________________________6 The iron industry ________________________________________________________________________6 The clothiers ____________________________________________________________________________7 Farming________________________________________________________________________________9 Hedges, farm and field size _______________________________________________________________11 Marl-pits ______________________________________________________________________________12 Hops__________________________________________________________________________________12 Woodland _____________________________________________________________________________12
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Abstraction Licensing Strategy February 2013
    - Medway Abstraction licensing strategy February 2013 A licensing strategy to manage water resources sustainably Reference number/code LIT 1995 We are the Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place - for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon House Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Tel: 0370 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency Medway CAMS Medway CAMS (Catchment Abstraction) Management Strategy area 1 Foreword Kent and South London (KSL) is home to six million people and covers an area of 6,000km² with a diverse range of environments and related pressures. Proposed growth will continue to stretch the resources available to support this increasing population. Water is our most essential natural resource, and it is our job to ensure that we manage and use it effectively and sustainably. KSL is one of the driest parts of England and Wales and there are many catchments where there is little or no water available for abstraction during dry periods. Demand from agriculture and industry, and above average household consumption all add to this pressure and affect both the water environment and fresh supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Communities in Maidstone's Local Plan
    Engaging Communities in Maidstone’s Local Plan Final Report – October 2014 5 Contents Page Executive Summary 2 Area Context 4 Methodology 7 Conclusions & recommendations 11 September Workshop – Future Actions 12 Annex 1 - Documentation of engagement with each village 24 Annex 2 – Design South East Facilitators 53 1 1.1 Background 1: ExecutiveLike many places in the Summary South East, Maidstone is set to experience significant population change over the next 15 to 20 years. As a result of this growth, Maidstone is expected to have a higher objectively assessed housing need than previously anticipated. The changes will affect how the borough delivers homes, jobs and transport over the coming years. In March 2013 the council decided to amalgamate the Maidstone Borough Core Strategy and the Development Delivery DPD into a single Maidstone Borough Local Plan and the plan period was rolled forward from 2006-26 to 2011-31. The cabinet approved the draft local plan, including site allocations for consultation, in February 2014. The consultation ran from 21 March 2014 to 7 May 2014. The revised Local Plan will go out to consultation again in 2015. As part of the consultation process, Maidstone Borough Council commissioned Design South East to engage with the Parish Councils who were designated as ‘Rural Service Centres’ or ‘Larger Villages’ where development was proposed. The aim was to find out how much understanding there was of the Local Plan process and to ensure that these Parish Councils felt their views had been listened to constructively. Additionally, DSE would lead workshops with these Parish Councils to help them develop ‘Place making’ elements of their Neighbourhood Development Plans.
    [Show full text]
  • River Medway Catchment Management Plan Phase 1
    i i' A - S~o J h V ' & '5 £> RIVER MEDWAY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN PHASE 1 NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region Guardians of the Water Environment © National Rivers Authority 1991 All rights reserved. No part o f this publication may he reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the National Rivers Authority. Environm ent Agency Information Services Unit Please return or renew this item by the due date Due Date NRA Grainger Davies Regional General Manager Our ref. National Rivers Authority B.Sc. C.Eng, MICE MIWEM Your ref. Southern Region River Medway Catchment Management Plan Phase 1 December 1991 FOREWORD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to preserve and improve the water environment and to protect people and property from flooding. In its role as "Guardian of the Water Environment", the NRA is committed to establishing a sound planning base for the future management and development of river catchments. These first catchment management plans will be a catalyst for achieving improvements in the water environment. As a vehicle for consultation they will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document they will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to achieving improvements. This plan is one of the first to be prepared in the country as a whole. I look forward to re ce ivin g the contributions of those people and organisations'most closely involved with the river and its surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • North Downs Greensand Vale V01 DRAFT
    PROJECT: Shepway Heritage Strategy DOCUMENT NAME: Theme 1(b): North Downs & Greensand Vale Version Status Prepared by Date V01 INTERNAL DRAFT F Clark 11.08.17 Comments – first draft of text. No illustrations or figures. Needs the addition of photographs. Check references. Need to add to Statement of Significance in places. Version Status Prepared by Date V02 Version Status Prepared by Date V03 Version Status Prepared by Date V04 Version Status Prepared by Date V05 EB 11.11b 1 | P a g e (1b) North Downs & Greensand Vale 1. Summary The North Downs and Greensand Vale constitute a diverse and unique landscape with many elements that are iconic features of the county, such as the White Cliffs of Dover, Folkestone Downs and Elham Valley. Many of these landscapes are also of national significance for their conservation value both for the diverse wildlife and habitats supported here as well as for their geological importance. The North Downs and Greensand Vale can also boast an exceptionally rich historic environment with a number of heritage assets that are nationally significant and that also make key contributions to the local character and sense of place. In particular, these relate to the religious, farming and defence heritage of the area. 2. Introduction The topography of Kent is broadly based on major geological features that are determined by a series of ridges and formations running from west to east across the county. Rocks which are exposed at the surface date to between the Cretaceous and Tertiary age (140 to 50 million years ago) and are a thick sequence of sands, clays and limestones that are gently folded into an upfold (anticline) which is known as the Weald Dome.
    [Show full text]