DOCSLIB.ORG

Agnotology-Ch-1-Proctor-2008.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agnotology-Ch-1-Proctor-2008.Pdf AGNOTOLOGY The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance Edited by Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger Stanford University Press Stanford, California Contents VII Preface . Sranford Universiry Press 1 Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Sranford, California Production of Ignorance (and lts Study) Ii) 2008 by rhe Board of Trusrees of the Leland Sranford Junior Universary. I ROBERT N. PROCTOR All righrs reserved. No parr of this book may be reproduced or rransmined in any form or by any means, electronic SEC RE C Y, SE LE CT ION , AND SU PPRESSION or mechanical, mcludmg photocopying and recording, or 111 any informarion srorage or PART 1 remeval system warhour the prior wrarrcn permission of Sranford Un iversity Press. Removing Knowledge: The Logic of Modern Censorship Printed in the United rates of America on acid-free, archaval-quala ry paper 2 37 Library of Congress Caraloging-in-Pu blacation Dara PET ER CALISON Agnorology: the making and unmaking of ignorance I edared by Roberr N. Procror and . Challenging Knowledge: How Climate Science Became Londa Schiebinger. 3 p.cm. a Victim of the Cold War Includes bibl iographical references and index. NAOMI ORESKES AND ER IK M . CONWAY 5 5 ISBN 978-0-8047-5652-5 (cloth: alk. paper)- ISBN 978-0-8047-5901 -4 (pbk.: alk. paper) . Manufactured Uncertainty: Contested Science and the 1. Ignorance (Theory of knowledge)-Social aspecrs-Congresses. 2. Secrecy­ 4 Congresses. I. Procror, Robert, 19 54- II. Protection of the Public's Health and Environment Schiebinger, Londa L. BD221.A36 2008 DAVID MICHAELS 001--dc22 20070498 11 . Coming to Understand: Orgasm and the Epistemology Porrions of the following chapters have been previously published as indicated: CHAPTER 2: 5 Peter Galison, "Removing Knowledge,,. Critical Inquiry 3 1 (2004): 229-243. Ii) 2004, of Ignorance The University of Chicago. Reprinted by permission of The Universiry of Chicago Press. 108 NANCY TUANA CllAl'TER 4: D. Michaels and C. Monforron, k Manufacturing Uncerminty: ('on rested Science and the Protecrion of the Public's Health and Environment, American journal of Public Health 95 (2005): S39-S48. © 2005 American Public Health Association. CHAPTER 5: ancy LO T KNOWLED GE, LOST WORLDS Tuana, "Coming to Undersrand: Orgasm and the Epistemology of Ignorance," Hypatia: A PART 11 journal of Feminist Philosophy 19 (2004): 194-23 2.. Ii) 2004 by I lypatia, Inc. Reprinted by 6. West Indian Abortifacients and the Making of Ignorance permission of Indiana Universiry Press. CllArTER 6: Londa Schiebinger, Plants and Empire: 149 Colonial B1oprospecting in the Atlantic \Vorld. © 2004 by Londa Schiebinger. Reprinted by LONDA SC HIEBIN CE R permission of Harvard University Press. CllAPTFR 7: Adrienne Mayor, l·osstl Legends of the First Americans.© 2005 by Princeron University Press. Reprinted by permission of Princeton . Suppression of Indigenous Fossil Knowledge: U111 vcrs1ry Press. C llAPTER to: Charles W. Malls, "White Ignorance," pp. 13-38 in Race and 7 Epistemolog1es of Ignorance, Shannon Sullivan and Nancy Tuana, eds.© ;i.007 State University from Claverack, New York, 1705 to Agate Springs, of New York Press. Reprinted by permission of Srate University of New York Press. Nebraska, 2005 D~igned by Bruce Lundquisr AORILNNE M AYOR Typeset at Stanford University Press in roll 5 Sabon CONTENTS 8. Mapping Ignorance in Archaeology: The Advantages of Historical Hindsight Preface AL I SON WY LI E PART Ill THEORIZING IG NORANCE 9. Social Theories of Ignorance w E LI v E JN AN AGE OF IGNORANCE, and it is irnportantto understand MICHAEL J. SMIT H SON 209 how this came to be and why. Our goal here is to explore how ignorance IO. White Ignorance is produced or maintained in diverse settings, through mechanisms such CHARLES W. MILLS 230 as deliberate or inadvertent neglect, secrecy and suppression, document destruction, unquestioned tradition, and myriad fo rms of inherent (or II. Risk Management versus the Precautionary Principle: avoidable) culturopolitical selectivity. Agnotology is the study of igno­ Agnotology as a Strategy in the Debate over Genetically rance making, the lost and forgotten. One focus is on knowledge that Engineered Organisms could have been but wasn't, or should be but isn't, but we shall also see DAVID MAGNUS that not all ignorance is bad. IZ. Smoking Out Objectivity: Journalistic Gears in the Our p rimary purpose here is to promote the study of ignorance, by Agnotology M achine developing tools for understanding how and why various forms of know­ JON CHR I STENSEN 266 ing have "not come to be," or disappeared, or have been delayed or long neglected, for better or for worse, at various points in history. Swimming List of Contributors as we do in oceans of ignorance, examples could be multiplied ad infini­ Index tum. Contributors to this volu me probe the secrecy maintained by mili­ tary classification, the "doubt" peddled by manufacturers of carcinogens ("doubt is our product"), the denialist claims of environmental troglo­ dytes, the nontransfer of technologies (such as birth control) from colonial outposts to imperial centers, the role of disciplinarity and media "balance routines" on agnogenesis, and certain aspects of racial and sexual igno­ rance. The idea is that a great deal of attention has been given to episte­ mology (the study of how we know) when "how or why we don't know" is often just as important, usually far more scandalous, and remarkably undertheorized. This volume emerged from workshops held at Pennsylvania State Uni­ versity in 2003 and at Stanford University in 2005, the goal of which was to come to grips with how ignorance has been understood, created, and ignored, linking these ideas also to allied creations of secrecy, uncertainty, confusion, silence, absence, and impotence-especially as these pertain VI VII u PREFA C E to scientific activities. For financial support, we owe a debt of gratitude to the National Science Foundation-and at Penn State, to the Science, Medicine, and Technology in Culture initiative, the Institute for Arts and Humanities, the Rock Ethics Institute, and the departments of History, English, and Anthropology. At Stanford we are also grateful to the His­ tory & Philosophy of Science, the Suppes Center, the Humanities Center, Modern Thought and Literature, and the Stanford Center for Biomedical AGNOTOLOGY Ethics. We are also thankful for administrative help provided by Rosemary Rogers, Michelle Cale, and Jeanene Jenkins. We are hoping this volume will be taken as opening a door to a broader realm of inquiry. We invite others to step through this door, and to explore the many other realms of ignorance that saturate and define our world. viii CHAPTE R I Agnotology A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study) ROBERT N. PROCTOR We are often unaware of the scope and structure of our ignorance. Ignorance is not just a blank space on a person's mental map. It has contours and coher­ ence, and for all 1 know rules of operation as well. So as a corollary to writing about what we know, maybe we should add getting familiar with our ignorance. T homas Pynchon, 1984 Doubt is our product. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company, internal memo, 1969 PHI LO SOPH ERS LOVE TO TALK ABOUT KNOWLEDGE . Awhoie field is devoted to reflection on the topic, with product tie-ins to professor­ ships and weighty conferences. Epistemology is serious business, taught in academies the world over: there is "moral" and "social" epistemology, epistemology of the sacred, the closet, and the family. There is a Compu­ tational Epistemology Laboratory at the University of Waterloo, and a Center for Epistemology at the Free Uni versity in Amsterdam. A Google search turns up separate websites for "constructivist," "feminist," and "evolutionary" epistemology, of course, but also " libidinal," "android," " Quaker," "Internet," and (my fa vorite) "erotometaphysical" epistemol­ ogy. H arvard offers a course in the field (without the erotometaphysical part), which (if we are to believe its website) explores the epistemic status of weighty claims like "the standard meter is I meter long" and "I am not a brain in a vat." 1 We seem to know a lot about knowledge.2 Wha t is remarkable, though, is how li ttle we know a bout ignorance.3 There is not even a well-known word for its study {though our hope is tO I u ROBERT N. PROCTOR AGNOTOLOGY: A M I SSING TERM change that), no fancy conferences or polished websites. This is particularly thing at all about time before the Big Bang circa 14 billion years ago. And remarkable, given (a) how much ignorance there is, (b) how many kinds there are many different ways not to know. Ignorance can be the flipside of there are, and (c) how consequential ignorance is in our lives. memory, what we don't know because we have forgotten, parts of which The point of this volume is to argue that there is much, in fact, to know. can be restored by historical inquiries but most of which is forever lost. Ignorance has many friends and enemies, and figures big in everything from (And we often cannot say which.) Ignorance can be made or unmade, and trade association propaganda to military operations to slogans chanted at science can be complicit in either process. children. Lawyers think a lot about it, since it often surfaces in consumer product liability and tort litigation, where the question is often "Who THE PURPOSE OF TH E PRESENT VOLUME isprogrammatic,tobegina knew what, and when?" Ignorance has many interesting surrogates and discussion of ignorance as more than the "not yet known" or the steadily overlaps in myriad ways with-as it is generated by-secrecy, stupidity, retreating frontier. We need t"; think about the conscious, unconscious, and apathy, censorship, disinformation, faith, and forgetfulness, all of which stru~ral production of ignorance, its diverse causes and conformations, are science-twitched.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of
    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • What Literature Knows: Forays Into Literary Knowledge Production
    Contributions to English 2 Contributions to English and American Literary Studies 2 and American Literary Studies 2 Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Kai Merten (eds.) Merten Kai / What Literature Knows This volume sheds light on the nexus between knowledge and literature. Arranged What Literature Knows historically, contributions address both popular and canonical English and Antje Kley US-American writing from the early modern period to the present. They focus on how historically specific texts engage with epistemological questions in relation to Forays into Literary Knowledge Production material and social forms as well as representation. The authors discuss literature as a culturally embedded form of knowledge production in its own right, which deploys narrative and poetic means of exploration to establish an independent and sometimes dissident archive. The worlds that imaginary texts project are shown to open up alternative perspectives to be reckoned with in the academic articulation and public discussion of issues in economics and the sciences, identity formation and wellbeing, legal rationale and political decision-making. What Literature Knows The Editors Antje Kley is professor of American Literary Studies at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. Her research interests focus on aesthetic forms and cultural functions of narrative, both autobiographical and fictional, in changing media environments between the eighteenth century and the present. Kai Merten is professor of British Literature at the University of Erfurt, Germany. His research focuses on contemporary poetry in English, Romantic culture in Britain as well as on questions of mediality in British literature and Postcolonial Studies. He is also the founder of the Erfurt Network on New Materialism.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Represent Human Behavior and Decision Making in Earth System Models?
    Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., doi:10.5194/esd-2017-18, 2017 Manuscript under review for journal Earth Syst. Dynam. Discussion started: 2 March 2017 c Author(s) 2017. CC-BY 3.0 License. How to represent human behavior and decision making in Earth system models? A guide to techniques and approaches Finn Müller-Hansen1,2, Maja Schlüter3, Michael Mäs4, Rainer Hegselmann5, 6, Jonathan F. Donges1,3, Jakob J. Kolb1,2, Kirsten Thonicke1, and Jobst Heitzig1 1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg A31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2Department of Physics, Humboldt University Berlin, Newtonstraße 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany 3Stockholm Resilience Center, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B, 114 19 Stockholm, Sweden 4Department of Sociology and ICS, University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG Groningen, The Netherlands 5Frankfurt School of Finance & Manangement, Sonnemannstraße 9-11 60314 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 6Bayreuth Research Center for Modeling and Simulation, Bayreuth University, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany Correspondence to: Finn Müller-Hansen ([email protected]) Abstract. In the Anthropocene, humans have a critical impact on the Earth system and vice versa, which can generate complex feedback processes between social and ecological dynamics. Integrating human behavior into formal Earth System Models (ESMs), however, requires crucial modeling assumptions about actors and their goals, behavioral options and decision rules, as well as modeling decisions regarding human social interactions and the aggregation of individuals’ behavior. In this tutorial 5 review, we compare existing modeling approaches and techniques from different disciplines and schools of thought dealing with human behavior at various levels of decision making. Providing an overview over social-scientific modeling approaches, we demonstrate modelers’ often vast degrees of freedom but also seek to make modelers aware of the often crucial consequences of seemingly innocent modeling assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENCE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS the Official Journal of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence
    Volume 3 | Autumn 2017 DEFENCE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS The official journal of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence Overwriting the City: Graffiti, Communication, and Urban Contestation in Athens Putting the Strategy Back into Strategic Communications Japanese Strategic Communication: Its Significance As a Political oolT ‘You Can Count On Us’: When Malian Diplomacy Stratcommed Uncle Sam Strategic Communications, Boko Haram, and Counter-Insurgency Fake News, Fake Wars, Fake Worlds Living Post-Truth Lives … But What Comes After? ‘We Have Met The Enemy And He Is Us’ Defence Strategic Communications | Volume 3 | Autumn 2017 1 ISSN 2500-9478 Defence Strategic Communications Editor-in-Chief Dr. Neville Bolt Managing Editor Linda Curika Editor Anna Reynolds Editorial Board Professor Mervyn Frost Professor Nicholas O’Shaughnessy Professor Žaneta Ozoliņa Professor J. Michael Waller Professor Natascha Zowislo-Grünewald Dr. Emma Louise Briant Dr. Nerijus Maliukevicius Dr. Agu Uudelepp Matt Armstrong Thomas Elkjer Nissen Defence Strategic Communications is an international peer-reviewed journal. The journal is a project of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (NATO StratCom COE). It is produced for scholars, policy makers and practitioners around the world. It does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or the NATO StratCom COE. The views presented in the following articles are those of the authors alone. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. These articles may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE and the academic journal Defence Strategic Communications. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence Riga, Kalnciema iela 11b, Latvia LV1048 www.stratcomcoe.org Ph.: 0037167335463 [email protected] Living Post-Truth Lives … But What Comes After? 191 LIVING POST-TRUTH LIVES … BUT WHAT COMES AFTER? A review essay by Kevin Marsh Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back Matthew D’Ancona.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Ignorance: on the Importance of Developing Psychoanalytic Sensibilities in Education
    TEACHING IGNORANCE: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING PSYCHOANALYTIC SENSIBILITIES IN EDUCATION Jennifer Logue Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Lacan once remarked that there was “something quite ironic about Christ’s injunction to love thy neighbor as thyself because, actually, people hate themselves.”1 We might say, in observing the way people treat each other, perhaps they have always loved their neighbors as they’ve loved themselves: that is, “with a great deal of cruelty and disregard.”2 In his thorough engagement with Freud, Lacan theorizes that we are, at the core, ambivalent animals: wherever we love we hate, wherever we hate we love. Ambivalence does not, in the Freudian story (retold by Lacan, retold here by Adam Philips), mean mixed feelings, it means conflicting or contradictory feelings. Love and hate—too narrow concepts and so not quite accurate articulations—are the rudimentary sources, the most primary affects with which we try to make sense of our realities. They are mutually constituting in that you can’t have one without the other.3 Psychoanalytic inquiry encourages us to grapple with our often unrecognized yet structurally organizing ambivalences about anything and everything that matters to us, even as we carry on as if we are entirely rational, as if we are masters of our own house, so to speak. In other words, psychoanalytic insight informs us that we are often ignorant to our own affective (dis)investments. Can Lacan’s observation about our loving and hating our neighbors the way we love and hate ourselves
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Countering Climate Science Denial
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 150, part 2, 2017, pp. 207–219. ISSN 0035-9173/17/020207-13 Understanding and countering climate science denial John Cook Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract Science denial causes a range of damaging impacts on society. This is particularly the case with climate science denial, which has resulted in strong polarization around a non-controversial scientific issue, and prolific dissemination of climate misinformation. This in turn has had the effect of reducing public acceptance of climate change, and eroding support for policies to mitigate climate change. In order to develop effective responses to science denial, it is necessary to first understand the drivers of science denial, which leads to deeper understanding of the techniques employed to cast doubt on the reality of climate change. Analysis of denialist techniques can inform development of interventions that neutralize misinformation. Inoculation has been shown to be an effective way to preemptively reduce the influence of climate science denial. Two methods to practically implement inoculation are misconception-based learning (teaching science by addressing scientific misconceptions) and techno- cognition (an interdisciplinary approach that implements psychological principles in the design of technological solutions to misinformation). Interventions and procedures developed for the counter- ing of climate misinformation may also be applied to other scientific topics rife with misinformation, such as vaccination and evolution. Introduction damaging and significant impacts of misin- here is an overwhelming scientific con- formation. In 2014, the World Economic T sensus that humans are causing global Forum named online misinformation as one warming.
    [Show full text]
  • Ignorance Production and Corporate Science
    IGNORANCE PRODUCTION AND CORPORATE SCIENCE by Marilena Danelon A thesis submitted to the Department of Philosophy in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September, 2015) Copyright ©Marilena Danelon, 2015 Abstract This thesis is a philosophical exploration of “agnotology”, the study of ignorance or non- knowledge, and focuses on the production of ignorance for private interests. In particular, I argue that corporate science often deliberately produces ignorance in an effort to promote corporate interests. My thesis is structured into five chapters. In Chapter 1, I introduce agnotology and outline Robert N. Proctor’s three categories thereof: ignorance as native state, ignorance as selective choice, and ignorance as active construct. In Chapter 2, I present a review of the agnotological literature on the basis of which I argue for two expanded categories of ignorance: ignorance from ideology, and ignorance from interest. In Chapter 3, I address the question of the normative assumptions underlying agnotology. As well, given agnotology’s task of unpacking the values laden in science, agnotology’s normative conception of science may stand in tension with a conception of science as objective, neutral inquiry. In the end, I argue that agnotologists need not deny science’s objectivity when they view science as value-laden. In Chapter 4, I present a case study. Through an agnotological analysis, I argue that some HPV vaccine legislation was passed via agnogenesis. I also argue that the silencing of vaccine skeptics is a form of agnogenesis. This case, interpreted in the light of the novel agnotological framework developed in Chapters 2 and 3, supports my main thesis that corporate science serves primarily corporate interests via agnogenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Post‐Truth and the Production of Ignorance
    Sociological Forum, 2019 DOI: 10.1111/socf.12576 © 2019 Eastern Sociological Society Post-Truth and the Production of Ignorance1 Joanna Kempner2 This essay is written in response to Fujimura and Holmes’s piece “Staying the Course,” published in the December 2019 special issue of Sociological Forum—Resistance in the Twenty-First Century. KEYWORDS: ignorance; knowledge; post-truth; power; science; technology. These days, even postmodernists might be forgiven a little nostalgia for a time when truth felt easier to grasp. Every day, we are introduced to a new disorienting fissure with what previously seemed to be obvious fact. News anchors in the United States continue to host debates about the existence of climate change, despite his- toric hurricanes that have nearly wiped out entire island nations. The public appears willing to question whether holding young children in detention for months on end meets the definition of a “concentration camp.” And many of us now wonder whether Donald Trump could, in fact, shoot a man on Fifth Avenue and then suc- cessfully deny what we have all witnessed. Given this political hellscape, it is not surprising that so many scholars have begun to question and debate the general util- ity of critique, particularly when it comes to critiques of science (Fassin 2017; Latour 2004; Sismondo 2017). Even Bruno Latour (2004)—the scholar who is per- haps most closely associated (rightly or wrongly) with the idea that facts are socially constructed—has argued that science studies scholars must now begin defending science. Fujimura and Holmes’s (2019) essay on the value of science and technology studies (STS) scholarship in relationship to the “post-truth” movement wades into this debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy: Third Edition Robert Audi & Paul Audi Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01505-0 - The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy: Third Edition Robert Audi & Paul Audi Frontmatter More information THE CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY THIRD EDITION This is the most comprehensive dictionary of philosophical terms and thinkers available in English. Previously acclaimed as the most author- itative and accessible dictionary of philosophy in any language, it has been widely translated and has served both professional philosophers and students of philosophy worldwide. Written by a team of more than 550 experts – including more than 100 new to this third edition – the dictionary contains approximately 5,000 entries ranging from short definitions to full-length articles. It concisely defines terms, concretely illustrates ideas, and informatively describes philosophers. It is designed to facilitate the understanding of philosophy at all levels and in all fields. Key features of this third edition: Some 500 new entries covering both Eastern and Western philosophy, as well as individual countries such as China, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain Increased coverage of such growing fields as ethics and philosophy of mind Scores of new intellectual portraits of leading contemporary thinkers Wider coverage of Continental philosophy Dozens of new concepts in cognitive science and other areas Enhanced cross-referencing to add context and to increase under- standing Expansions of both text and index to facilitate research and browsing Robert Audi is John A. O’Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is the author of numerous books and articles. His recent books include Moral Perception (2013); Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State (2011); Rationality and Religious Commitment (2011); Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (2010); and Moral Value and Human Diversity (2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Destructive realism: Metaphysics as the foundation of natural science Rowbottom, Darrell Patrick How to cite: Rowbottom, Darrell Patrick (2004) Destructive realism: Metaphysics as the foundation of natural science, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2824/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk DESTRUCTIVE REALISM: METAPHYSICS AS THE FOUNDATION OF NATURAL SCIENCE DARRELL PATRICK ROWBOTTOM THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD IN PHILOSOPHY, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM 2004 ABSTRACT This thesis has two philosophical positions as its targets. The first is 'scientific realism' of the form defended by Boyd, (the early) Putnam, and most recently Psillos. The second is empiricism in the vein of Mill, Mach, Ayer, Carnap, and Van Fraassen. My objections to both have a rather Popperian flavour. For I argue that 'confirmation' is a misnomer, that so-called 'ampliative inferences' are heuristics at best, and that naturalism and subjectivism are regressive doctrines.
    [Show full text]
  • Oreskes CV FEB 2020
    Naomi Oreskes Professor of the History of Science Affiliated Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge MA [email protected] http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hsdept/bios/oreskes.html Education B.Sc. (First Class Honours) 1981 Royal School of Mines, Imperial College Ph.D. 1990 Stanford University (Graduate Special Program: Geological Research and History of Science) EMPLOYMENT Current Professor of the History of Science, Affiliated Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University. Columnist, Scientific American magazine, “The Observatory” 2005-2013 Professor, Department of History & Program in Science Studies Adjunct Professor of Geosciences (from 2007), University of California, San Diego 2008-2011 Provost, Sixth College, University of California, San Diego 2003-2006 Director, Science Studies Program, University of California, San Diego 1998- 2005 Associate Professor, Department of History & Program in Science Studies, UCSD 1996-1998 Associate Professor, History and Philosophy of Science Gallatin School of Individualized Study, New York University 1991-1996 Assistant Professor of Earth Sciences and Adjunct Asst. Professor of History, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 1990-1991 Visiting Asst. Professor of Earth Sciences and Visiting Asst. Professor of History Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 1984-1989 Research Assistant, Geology Department, and Teaching Assistant, Depts. of Geology, Philosophy, and Applied Earth Sciences Stanford University 1981-1984 Geologist, Western Mining
    [Show full text]
  • To Know Or Better Not To: Agnotology and the Social Construction of Ignorance in Commercially Driven Research
    Article Fernández Pinto To Know or Better Not to: Agnotology and the Social Construction of Ignorance in Commercially Driven Research Manuela Fernández Pinto Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia / [email protected] Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland. Abstract With an innovative perspective on the social character of ignorance production, agnotology has been a fruitful approach for understanding the social and epistemological consequences of the interaction between industry and scientif c research. In this paper, I argue that agnotology, or the study of ignorance, contributes to a better understanding of commercially driven research and its societal impact, showing the ways in which industrial interests have reshaped the epistemic aims of traditional scientif c practices, turning them into mechanisms of ignorance production. To do so, I examine some of the main contributions to agnotology and provide a taxonomy of practices of ignorance construction common in commercially driven research today. In particular, I present the tobacco industry’s campaign against the health hazards of smoking as a paradigmatic case of ignorance production, identifying f ve central strategies. I then argue that the same strategies have been used in three other cases — global warming, pharmaceuticals, and the 2008 f nancial crisis. Keywords: agnotology, commercially driven science, social construction of ignorance. Introduction Through the 20th century, the social organization 1980s, led to major changes in the organization of of scientif c research had radical transformations, research and development (R&D) in the U.S. (Der- from big in-house corporate labs fueled by major touzos, 1989: 306; Tyson, 1992: 291; Hunt, 1999: U.S.
    [Show full text]