DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Impact Assessment (NZ Ecology) and Vegetation Report (Opus)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Impact Assessment (NZ Ecology) and Vegetation Report (Opus) Appendix J Ecological Impact Assessment (NZ Ecology) and Vegetation Report (Opus) Ecological Impact Assessment McPherson Quarry Prepared for McPherson Resources Ltd 15 October 2019 Report Number 1708203-001 V5 Document Sign-Off Author(s): Stephanie Angove-Emery Ecologist Ecology New Zealand Limited Jasmine Dungey Ecologist Ecology New Zealand Limited Connor Whiteley Senior Ecologist Ecology New Zealand Limited Review: Marc Choromanski Senior Ecologist Ecology New Zealand Limited Released by: Simon Chapman Principal Ecologist Ecology New Zealand Limited Page 2 of 52 McPherson Quarry Report No. 1708203.1-001.V4 October 19 Contents 1. Introduction 6 1.1. Background 6 1.2. Purpose and Scope 6 1.3. Site Location, Description and Ecological Context 6 2. Methodology 8 2.1. Terrestrial Assessment 8 2.1.1. Avifauna 8 2.1.2. Chiropteran fauna 8 2.1.3. Herpetofauna 8 2.2. Freshwater Assessment 9 2.2.1. Watercourse Assessment 9 2.2.2. Waterbody and Wetland Assessment 9 2.2.3. Fish 9 2.2.4. Aquatic Macroinvertebrates 10 3. Ecological Assessment 11 3.1. Terrestrial Ecological Values 11 3.1.1. Avifauna 11 3.1.2. Chiropteran fauna 11 3.1.3. Herpetofauna 13 3.1.4. Pest Animals 15 3.2. Freshwater Ecology 15 3.2.1. Watercourse Assessment 15 3.2.2. Waterbody Assessment 19 3.2.3. Fish 23 3.2.4. Aquatic Macroinvertebrates 24 4. Assessment of Ecological Effects 26 4.1. Terrestrial 26 4.1.1. Avoidance and Mapping Revisions 26 4.1.2. Assessment of Values (EIANZ) 26 4.1.3. Assessment of values (Regional Criteria) 27 4.1.4. Magnitude of Effects 27 4.1.5. Overall Pre-Mitigation Level of Effects Rating 28 4.2. Freshwater 28 4.2.1. Ponds 28 4.2.2. Tributary 1 29 4.2.3. Stream 1 30 Page 3 of 52 McPherson Quarry Report No. 1708203.1-001.V4 October 19 4.2.4. Overall Pre-Mitigation Level of Effects Rating 31 5. Management of Effects 32 5.1. Terrestrial 32 5.2. Freshwater 33 6. Post-Mitigation Level of Effects 35 6.1. Terrestrial 35 6.2. Freshwater 36 6.3. Recommendations: 36 7. Conclusion 38 List of Figures Figure 1 Significant Natural Areas indicated in and around site. .................................................................. 7 Figure 2 Bio-acoustic profile of possible long-tailed bat pass. ...................................................................... 12 List of Tables Table 1: Bird species recorded during ENZL field assessment and their threat status ..................... 11 Table 2 Summary of herpetofauna found within 25km of the site. ............................................................ 14 Table 3: Fish caught on site (Appendix D shows trap locations). ................................................................ 23 Table 4: Fish species found within the wider Mangatawhiri River catchment based on NZFFD ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Table 5: Results of macroinvertebrate sampling at four sites, McPherson Quarry ............................ 25 Table 6 Summary of habitat types and their values identified onsite. ..................................................... 27 Table 7 Summary of magnitude of effects. ............................................................................................................. 27 Table 8 Overall level of effects rating (EIANZ, 2018).................................................................................................... 28 Table 9 Overall level of effects rating (EIANZ, 2018). .......................................................................................... 31 Table 10 Overall post-mitigation level of effects, Fauna ............................................................................................ 35 Table 11 Overall post-mitigation level of effects, Freshwater .................................................................................. 36 List of Plates Plate 1 Scattered specimen trees representing bat roosting habitat. 12 Plate 2 Kānuka-dominant bush block on eastern boundary of site. 13 Plate 3 High-quality potential frog habitat in a stream directly east of the site. 14 Plate 4 Stream 1 classified as a permanent, hard-bottomed stream 16 Plate 5 Stream 1 channel morphology within the pasture area with unfettered stock access 17 Plate 6 Photo of macroinvertebrate sampling being undertaken within Tributary 1. Grazing of rushes by stock is clear from the photo. 18 Plate 7 Photo of outfall drain showing the clearly defined and excavated channel. 19 Plate 8 Photo of North Pond clearly showing the lack of any macrophyte growth. 20 Plate 9 Pond 2 from the southern bank. 22 Page 4 of 52 McPherson Quarry Report No. 1708203.1-001.V4 October 19 Appendices Appendix A - Report Limitations Appendix B - Site plans Appendix C - Terrestrial Surveying Efforts Appendix D - Freshwater features and surveying efforts Appendix E - Regional Policy Statement Ecological Assessment Section 11A Appendix F - Terrestrial habitat features (all unmarked areas classified as grazed pasture) Appendix G - Proposed Freshwater Impact Sites and Mitigation Appendix H - Avoidance Measures Page 5 of 52 McPherson Quarry Report No. 1708203.1-001.V4 October 19 1. INTRODUCTION This report1, prepared by Ecology New Zealand Limited (ENZL) for McPherson Resources Ltd (‘the client’), presents the results of an Ecological Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken at McPherson Quarry, 47 McPherson Road, Pokeno, Waikato (‘the site’)2. It provides an assessment of the current terrestrial fauna and aquatic values found within ‘Stages 1, 2 & 3’ of the proposed quarry expansion and overburden storage areas at the site. 1.1. Background3 McPherson Resources Limited proposes to expand its operation at the McPherson’s Quarry to extract aggregate from a greater area to meet the increasing demand within the district. The quarry is operating with existing use rights and will require a resource consent to continue future operations and to provide storage areas for overburden removed from the quarry site. Most of the quarry expansion footprint and overburden storage areas impact upon vegetation of negligible value (pasture and gorse). However, the expansion footprint also impacts upon relatively small areas of regenerating native forest located within the boundary of a Significant Natural Feature (SNF), being a Significant Natural Area (SNA) identified in the Operative Waikato District Plan. Therefore, an assessment of the effects of future quarrying operations on ecological values is considered necessary to support resource consent application. 1.2. Purpose and Scope This report is intended to be read as supplementary information to the McPherson Quarry Vegetation Assessment Report prepared by WSP-Opus, 2018. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the current terrestrial fauna and aquatic values within the site, which have yet to be assessed in detail. The scope of this report comprises the following: • A description of the terrestrial fauna and aquatic values; • An assessment of effects on terrestrial fauna and aquatic values; and • Recommendations to avoid, remedy, mitigate or offset adverse ecological effects. 1.3. Site Location, Description and Ecological Context McPherson Quarry is located at 47 McPherson Road (Property 3480373) on the eastern border of the Manukau Ecological District of the Auckland Ecological Region. The quarry is located at the south-western most extent of a near contiguous, native forest linkage between the quarry and the Hunua Ranges of the Auckland Region. At present, the majority of the existing vegetation onsite is comprised of pasture grass and gorse-dominated scrub. However, the quarry does bisect two large tracts of native forest located to the east and west of the site, which have been classified as Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) by the Waikato District Council (Figure 1). 1 This report is subject to the Report Limitations provided in Appendix A. 2 Defined as the proposed excavation areas (Stages 1,2,3 and overburden area) 3 Background information as detailed within Bridge, D., Turner, J., and Yungnickel M. (2018). McPherson Quarry Vegetation Assessment. Expansion Stages 1 to 3. WSPOpus. Page 6 of 52 McPherson Quarry Report No. 1708203.1-001.V4 October 19 Bluff Road Legend Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Overburden Storage Area SNA (Waikato District Council 2019) Indigenous Vegetation Avoidance These graphics have been produced as a result of information provided by the client and/or sourced by or provided to Ecology New Mcpherson Quarry, Mangatawhiri Zealand Limited by a third party for the purposes of providing the Site Map and SNA Overlay services. No responsibility is taken by Ecology New Zealand Limited for any liability or action arising from any incomplete or inaccurate 1:4,000 @ A3 information provided to Ecology New Zealand Limited (whether from Date: 15 October 2019 | Revision : 2 the client or a third party). The graphics are provided to the client Plan prepared for McPherson Resources Limited by Projection: NZGD2000/NZTM2000 Sources: Map data-Waikato District Council 2019;Stage for the benefit and use of the client and for the purpose for which it 1-3 footprints based on plans by Mansergh Graham Landscape Architects, dated October is intended. Ecology New Zealand Limited 2019.Overburden footprint-based on communications with Kinetic Environmental Ltd, dated © Ecology New Zealand Author: [email protected] | 25-07-2019 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1. Terrestrial Assessment Site investigations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Detecting Signals of Climatic Shifts and Land Use Change from Precipitation and River Discharge Variations: the Whanganui and Waikato Catchments
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. DETECTING SIGNALS OF CLIMATIC SHIFTS AND LAND USE CHANGE FROM PRECIPITATION AND RIVER DISCHARGE VARIATIONS: THE WHANGANUI AND WAIKATO CATCHMENTS A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences at The University of Waikato by Ying Qiao The University of Waikato 2012 III IV Abstract The Whanganui and Waikato river catchments have somewhat different degrees of exposure to the westerly wind systems. It is of interest to determine whether the two regions have similar times of occurrence of any concurrent shifts in river discharge and rainfall, with particular reference to mean value changes. Concurrent rainfall and runoff shifts are indicative of climatic variation but catchment land use changes (which will influence only discharge change) have also been occurring in both catchments, particularly with respect to forest planting or forest clearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Hortnz Submission On
    COMMENTS ON PROPOSED WAIKATO REGIONAL PLAN CHANGE 1 WAIKATO AND WAIPA RIVER CATCHMENTS TO: Waikato Regional Council COMMENTS ON: Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 Waikato and Waipa River Catchments NAME: Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) ADDRESS: PO Box 10 232 WELLINGTON 1. HortNZ’s submission, and the decisions sought, are detailed in the attached schedules: 1.1. HortNZ wishes to be heard in support of this submission. 1.2. This submission is supported by a technical report that is to be read in support of this submission. The report has been lodged with the Waikato Regional Council via FTP file Transfer and is titled “Values and Current Allocation of Responsibility For Discharges” Jacobs Technical Report in Support of the Horticulture NZ Submission on Healthy River Plan Change”. 1.3. The Plan and this submission cover a wide range of issues and there are potential consequential amendments that will be required to give effect to the relief sought in this submission. Decision sought: 1.4. Other changes or consequential amendments as are necessary to give effect to the matters raised in this submission. 2. Background to HortNZ and its RMA involvement: 2.1. Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) was established on 1 December 2005, combining the New Zealand Vegetable and Potato Growers’ and New Zealand Fruitgrowers’ and New Zealand Berryfruit Growers’ Federations. 2.2. On behalf of its 5,500 active grower members HortNZ takes a detailed involvement in resource management planning processes as part of its National Environmental Policies. HortNZ works to raise growers’ awareness of the RMA to ensure effective grower involvement under the Act, whether in the planning process or through resource consent applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]
  • North Island Regulations
    Fish & Game 1 2 3 5 4 6 Check www.fishandgame.org.nz for details of regional boundaries Code of Conduct .................................................................4 National Sports Fishing Regulations ....................................5 First Schedule .....................................................................7 1. Northland .......................................................................11 2. Auckland/Waikato ..........................................................15 3. Eastern ..........................................................................22 4. Hawke's Bay ...................................................................30 5. Taranaki .........................................................................33 6. Wellington .....................................................................37 The regulations printed in this guide booklet are subject to the Minister of Conservation’s approval. A copy of the published Anglers’ Notice in the New Zealand Gazette is available on www.fishandgame.org.nz Cover Photo: Jaymie Challis 3 Regulations CODE OF CONDUCT Please consider the rights of others and observe the anglers’ code of conduct • Always ask permission from the land occupier before crossing private property unless a Fish & Game access sign is present. • Do not park vehicles so that they obstruct gateways or cause a hazard on the road or access way. • Always use gates, stiles or other recognised access points and avoid damage to fences. • Leave everything as you found it. If a gate is open or closed leave it that way. • A farm is the owner’s livelihood and if they say no dogs, then please respect this. • When driving on riverbeds keep to marked tracks or park on the bank and walk to your fishing spot. • Never push in on a pool occupied by another angler. If you are in any doubt have a chat and work out who goes where. • However, if agreed to share the pool then always enter behind any angler already there. • Move upstream or downstream with every few casts (unless you are alone).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Module
    3 Water Module Table of Contents Module 3 Water Module 1 Policies included in the Regional Plan in accordance with the NPS on Freshwater Management 3-5 3.1 Water Resources 3-6 3.1.1 Issue 3-8 3.1.2 Objective 3-9 3.1.3 Clarification of the Relationship between Water and Geothermal Modules 3-12 3.1.4 Monitoring Options 3-13 3.2 Management of Water Resources 3-15 3.2.1 Issue 3-15 3.2.2 Objective 3-15 3.2.3 Policies 3-15 3.2.4 Implementation Methods – Water Management Classes and Standards 3-19 3.2.5 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-27 3.2.6 Monitoring Options 3-27 3.3 Water takes 3-29 3.3.1 Issue 3-31 3.3.2 Objective 3-33 3.3.3 Policies 3-35 3.3.4 Implementation Methods – Water Takes 3-51 3.4 Efficient Use of Water 3-85 3.4.1 Issue 3-85 3.4.2 Objective 3-86 3.4.3 Policies 3-86 3.4.4 Implementation Methods – Transfer of Water Take Permits 3-87 3.4.5 Implementation Methods – The Use of Water 3-91 3.5 Discharges* 3-95 3.5.1 Issue 3-95 3.5.2 Objective 3-95 3.5.3 Policies 3-96 3.5.4 Implementation Methods – Discharges 3-98 3.5.5 Implementation Methods – Farm Effluent Discharges 3-100 3.5.6 Implementation Methods – Discharge of Biosolids* and Sludges or Liquids from Activated Sludge Treatment Processes to Land 3-105 3.5.7 Implementation Methods – On-Site Sewage Discharges 3-109 3.5.8 Implementation Methods – Well and Aquifer Testing Discharges 3-114 3.5.9 Implementation Methods – Tracer Discharges 3-115 3.5.10 Implementation Methods – Drainage Water Discharges 3-116 3.5.11 Implementation Methods – Stormwater Discharges 3-118 3.5.12 High Risk
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6: Whitebait
    Appendix 6: Whitebait 1. Introduction The decline of whitebait fishery in the lower Waikato River was identified as a key concern for Maaori through a range of consultations with iwi (tribes) from throughout the river catchment, from the Lake Taupoo outlet down to the sea (NIWA et al., 2009). Recovery of the whitebait fishery in the lower river is required because it is an historic cultural fishery and also because the presence of large numbers of whitebait in the river is viewed as an indication of river health. Recovery of the whitebait fishery is therefore an important restoration goal for iwi in the Waikato River. However, restoration can only be achieved if the factors responsible for the decline in the fishery can be identified and reduced, and this pre-supposes that an historic decline in the fishery has occurred. The whitebait fishery comprises two components: the juvenile fish that migrate upriver and the whitebaiters that catch them. Although a habitat-related decline in the abundance of whitebait can result in fishery decline, an increase in whitebaiters can potentially cause a decline through overfishing. The fishery may also decline because of factors not related to a change in the fish stocks. For example, river works related to flood protection may reduce the number of locations on riverbanks where whitebaiters can fish, and access to fishing locations may become restricted. Factors affecting the whitebaiters and their access to the fishery therefore need to be identified separately from those related to restoration of the river environment. Overfishing was noted by some stakeholders as an important issue, but recent studies on the escapement of whitebait past whitebaiters’ nets in the Mokau River, have indicated that escapement is high (more than 70 percent) and that overfishing of the stocks is not affecting recruitment of juveniles to adult habitats (pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to the Action.Pub
    www.fishandgame.org.nz Access to the Action An Access Guide to Gamebird Hunng in the Auckland/Waikato Region Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 156 Brymer Road, RD 9 Hamilton Phone (07) 849 1666 aucklandwaikato@fishandgame.org.nz Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game has the statutory responsibilies to manage, maintain and en- hance the sportsfish and gamebird resource in the recreaonal interest of anglers and hunters. Fish & Game is not a government department but is funded solely from hunng and fishing licence sales. What your Auckland/Waikato Gamebird hunng licence buys: Best and cheapest hunng in the world. The ability to hunt throughout NZ. The opportunity to hunt a wide variety of gamebirds: mallard, grey and shoveler duck, par- adise shelduck, black swan, pukeko, Canada goose, pheasant & Californian quail. True user pays user says management of your sport. Protecon for the future of your sport by providing for gamebirds and their habitat. The creaon of habitat for all wildlife. “Geng started in Gamebird Hunng” is a free pamphlet issued by Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game. If you would like a copy of this go to the website or send a stamped, self-addressed en- velope to: Fish & Game 156 Brymer Road, RD9, Hamilton. Mai Mai Construcon Guidelines Hunters today are under pressure from people who do not understand the tradions of water fowl hunng. Hunters have an obligaon to construct and maintain their maimais and shoong stands in a manner that reflects well on the water fowl hunters image. A well constructed and maintained maimai or stand cannot but reflect well on the sport of water fowl hunng and ulmately contribute to an assurance that our children and grandchil- dren can also have the privilege of parcipang in this sport.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rivers of New Zealand
    Sl. No River Name 1 Aan River 2 Acheron River (Canterbury) 3 Acheron River (Marlborough) 4 Ada River 5 Adams River 6 Ahaura River 7 Ahuriri River 8 Ahuroa River 9 Akatarawa River 10 Akitio River 11 Alexander River 12 Alfred River 13 Allen River 14 Alma River 15 Alph River (Ross Dependency) 16 Anatoki River 17 Anatori River 18 Anaweka River 19 Anne River 20 Anti Crow River 21 Aongatete River 22 Aorangiwai River 23 Aorere River 24 Aparima River 25 Arahura River 26 Arapaoa River 27 Araparera River 28 Arawhata River 29 Arnold River 30 Arnst River 31 Aropaoanui River 32 Arrow River 33 Arthur River 34 Ashburton River / Hakatere 35 Ashley River / Rakahuri 36 Avoca River (Canterbury) 37 Avoca River (Hawke's Bay) 38 Avon River (Canterbury) 39 Avon River (Marlborough) 40 Awakari River 41 Awakino River 42 Awanui River 43 Awarau River 44 Awaroa River 45 Awarua River (Northland) 46 Awarua River (Southland) 47 Awatere River 48 Awatere River (Gisborne) 49 Awhea River 50 Balfour River www.downloadexcelfiles.com 51 Barlow River 52 Barn River 53 Barrier River 54 Baton River 55 Bealey River 56 Beaumont River 57 Beautiful River 58 Bettne River 59 Big Hohonu River 60 Big River (Southland) 61 Big River (Tasman) 62 Big River (West Coast, New Zealand) 63 Big Wainihinihi River 64 Blackwater River 65 Blairich River 66 Blind River 67 Blind River 68 Blue Duck River 69 Blue Grey River 70 Blue River 71 Bluff River 72 Blythe River 73 Bonar River 74 Boulder River 75 Bowen River 76 Boyle River 77 Branch River 78 Broken River 79 Brown Grey River 80 Brown River 81 Buller
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Hearing 18
    BEFORE WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL HEARINGS PANEL UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER OF Proposed Waikato District Plan Benjamin James Wilson PRIMARY EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF THE AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME COUNCIL (“FISH & GAME”) SUBMITTER ID: 433 Hearing Rural Dated: 8 September 2020 1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 1.1 My full name is Benjamin James Wilson. 1.2 I am employed as Chief Executive for the Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council at the Hamilton Office. I have held this role since 2013, prior to which I was the Fisheries Manager for the Council (since 1988). I have a BSc (Hons) and a MSc in Marine Science from Otago University. 1.3 I am very familiar with the Waikato District’s rivers and wetlands with my work with Fish and Game and recreational activities. 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT 2.1 Auckland/Waikato owns and actively manages some 1600 hectares of wetland in the Waikato District. These wetlands typically require intensive active management to maintain hydrology and weed control. 2.2 We request that a new permitted activity rule be introduced in the Waikato District Plan for earthworks that are specific to restoration work in wetlands within areas identified at Significant Natural Areas and Landscape and Natural Character Areas. Such a rule would bring the plan in line with the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Freshwater) Regulations 2020. 2.3 We support the Hearing 18 s42A Officers’ Report in excluding maimai from the building setback rules. 2.4 Nearly all game bird hunting in the Waikato District takes place in rural areas that will be zoned as Significant Natural Areas and/or Outstanding Natural Features.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuakau Structure Plan Archaeological Heritage
    TUAKAU STRUCTURE PLAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE Alexy Simmons and Malcolm Hutchinson Simmons & Associates Ltd. May 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The intended outcome of the archaeological assessment was to identify archaeological sites that form Tuakau’s pre-1900 history. The focus was on producing a report that could be used to direct archaeological management in the structure plan area. The primary method used to identify archaeological sites was a table top study that included: historical research; compilation of recorded archaeological site data; and geo- referencing of historic aerial photographs and plans. This information was used to build a predictive model or perspective on where pre-1900 sites should be and types of sites. The predicted site information was reviewed through the analysis of recent aerial photographs, Lidar data, liaison with members of the local community, and several visits to Tuakau. The comparative assessment of the structure plan growth areas indicates that no previously recorded or newly recorded archaeological sites are located in the development areas. But a substantial number of potential pre-1900 archaeological sites may be found: along the streams that drain into the Waikato River; under the existing commercial district; in pre-1900 residential areas along old road corridors including Harrisville Road and River Road; associated with pre-1900 buildings (included in the built heritage schedule); at Les Batkin Reserve; outside Alexandra Redoubt defensive bank and ditch; and miscellaneous other places noted in the report. A number of specific heritage issues have been presented in the final report chapter along with management options. Among the recommended options is the preparation of an archaeological conservation and management plan for Alexandra Redoubt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngati Te Ata (Waiohua) Cultural Values Assessment Report
    NGATI TE ATA (WAIOHUA) CULTURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT REPORT Auckland Metro Rail Programme – Papakura to Pukekohe Electrification (P2P) “Kia whakatōmuri a Ngaati Te Ata Waiohua ki te haere whakamua.” “Ngaati Te Ata Waiohua walk backwards into the future, with our eyes fixed on our past.” PREPARED FOR KIWIRAIL HOLDINGS LTD (FEBRUARY 2021) “Ko nga kahupokere ko nga kurirangaunu e kore e ngaro i te hinapouri” “Our chieftainship in Tamaki will never be lost to darkness” (Ngati Te Ata Chiefs Te Rangihahautu and Te Rangikaimata) Te Kahupokere, The Deeply Tattooed Hawke representing Chieftainship 2 Table of Contents 1.1.1. WHAKATAUKI ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ............................................................................................. ................ 555 2.2.2. FOREWARD ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ................................................................................................ ..................... 555 3.3.3. INTRODUCTION TO NGATI TE ATA ..................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WRC Lower Waikato 2D Modelling
    WRC Lower Waikato 2D Modelling Huntly, Ohinewai and Horotiu Model Build Waikato Regional Council Report February 2020 This report has been prepared under the DHI Business Management System certified by Bureau Veritas to comply with ISO 9001 (Quality Management) lower waikato modelling.docx / NALJ / 2020-02-25 WRC Lower Waikato 2D Modelling Huntly, Ohinewai and Horotiu Model Build Prepared for Waikato Regional Council Represented by Mr Rick Liefting, Team Leader Regional Hazards and Environmental Compliance Source: Wikipedia Project Manager Nuno Jeronimo Project number 44801126 Approval date 25 February 2020 Revision Final Classification Restricted DHI Water and Environment Ltd• B:HIVE, Smales Farm• Takapuna 0622 Auckland• New Zealand• Telephone: +64 9 912 9638 • Telefax: • [email protected]• www.dhigroup.com lower waikato modelling.docx / nalj / 2020-02-25 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2 Existing River Model ..................................................................................................... 2 3 Data ................................................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Data source .................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Data Gap Analysis ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]