DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Module

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Module 3 Water Module Table of Contents Module 3 Water Module 1 Policies included in the Regional Plan in accordance with the NPS on Freshwater Management 3-5 3.1 Water Resources 3-6 3.1.1 Issue 3-8 3.1.2 Objective 3-9 3.1.3 Clarification of the Relationship between Water and Geothermal Modules 3-12 3.1.4 Monitoring Options 3-13 3.2 Management of Water Resources 3-15 3.2.1 Issue 3-15 3.2.2 Objective 3-15 3.2.3 Policies 3-15 3.2.4 Implementation Methods – Water Management Classes and Standards 3-19 3.2.5 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-27 3.2.6 Monitoring Options 3-27 3.3 Water takes 3-29 3.3.1 Issue 3-31 3.3.2 Objective 3-33 3.3.3 Policies 3-35 3.3.4 Implementation Methods – Water Takes 3-51 3.4 Efficient Use of Water 3-85 3.4.1 Issue 3-85 3.4.2 Objective 3-86 3.4.3 Policies 3-86 3.4.4 Implementation Methods – Transfer of Water Take Permits 3-87 3.4.5 Implementation Methods – The Use of Water 3-91 3.5 Discharges* 3-95 3.5.1 Issue 3-95 3.5.2 Objective 3-95 3.5.3 Policies 3-96 3.5.4 Implementation Methods – Discharges 3-98 3.5.5 Implementation Methods – Farm Effluent Discharges 3-100 3.5.6 Implementation Methods – Discharge of Biosolids* and Sludges or Liquids from Activated Sludge Treatment Processes to Land 3-105 3.5.7 Implementation Methods – On-Site Sewage Discharges 3-109 3.5.8 Implementation Methods – Well and Aquifer Testing Discharges 3-114 3.5.9 Implementation Methods – Tracer Discharges 3-115 3.5.10 Implementation Methods – Drainage Water Discharges 3-116 3.5.11 Implementation Methods – Stormwater Discharges 3-118 3.5.12 High Risk Facilities 3-122 3.5.13 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-124 3.5.14 Monitoring Options 3-124 3.6 Damming and Diverting 3-125 3.6.1 Issue 3-125 3.6.2 Objective 3-125 3.6.3 Policies 3-126 3.6.4 Implementation Methods – Damming and Diverting 3-128 3.6.5 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-143 3.6.6 Monitoring Options 3-145 3.6.7 Spillway Requirements 3-146 3.7 Wetlands* 3-149 3.7.1 Issue 3-149 3.7.2 Objective 3-149 3.7.3 Policies 3-149 3.7.4 Implementation Methods – Wetlands 3-150 3.7.5 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-153 3.7.6 Monitoring Options 3-153 3.7.7 Table of Wetlands in the Waikato Region for Rule 3.7.4.6 3-154 3.7.8 Examples of Wetlands 3-156 3.8 Drilling* 3-160 3.8.1 Issue 3-160 3.8.2 Objective 3-160 3.8.3 Policies 3-161 3.8.4 Implementation Methods – Drilling 3-162 3.8.5 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-167 3.8.6 Monitoring Options 3-167 3.9 Non-Point Source Discharges* 3-168 3.9.1 Issue 3-168 3.9.2 Objective 3-168 3.9.3 Policies 3-168 3.9.4 Implementation Methods – Non-Point Source Discharges 3-169 3.9.5 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-175 3.9.6 Monitoring Options 3-175 3.9.7 Guidance Notes for the Use of Fertiliser 3-175 3.10 Lake Taupo Catchment 3-177 3.10.1 Issues 3-182 3.10.2 Objectives 3-183 3.10.3 Policies 3-184 3.10.4 Non-regulatory implementation methods 3-192 3.10.5 Implementation Methods – Land Use and Discharge Controls 3-198 3.10.6 Implementation Methods – Domestic Wastewater Treatment and Land Application 3-213 3.10.7 Environmental Results Anticipated 3-222 3.10.8 Procedure for Monitoring Objectives, Policies and Methods 3-223 3.10.9 Map of Lake Taupo Catchment 225 Tables Table 3-1 General Water Quality Status of the Main River Areas 3-7 Table 3-2 Locations Where Natural State Water Class Standard Does Not Apply 3-21 Table 3-4 Surface Water Take and Use - Recording Type and Frequency 3-49 Table 3-4A Catchment Investigation Dates 3-55 Table 3-5 Allocable Flows for Surface Water 3-75 Table 3-6 Sustainable Yields from Aquifers 3-83 Table 3-7 Nitrogen Loading Rate Calculations For Grazed Pasture 3-101 Table 3-8 Nitrogen Loading Rates for Various Land Users 3-104 Table 3-9 Pathogen and Contaminant levels 3-108 Table 3-10 Mean and standard deviation for four water quality variables measured at Lake Taupo deep water monitoring site 3-178 Policies included in the Regional Plan in accordance with the NPS on Freshwater Management The National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management 2011 (issued by notice in the Gazette on 12 May 2011) directs regional councils to include two policies in their Regional Plans. Council resolved to include these Policies in its Regional Plan on 28 July 2011.The policies are designed as interim measures to be included in plans until such time as plans can be amended through the First Schedule process to give effect to the Freshwater NPS. Policy A4 of the NPS on Freshwater Management 1. When considering any application for a discharge the consent authority must have regard to the following matters: a. the extent to which the discharge would avoid contamination that will have an adverse effect on the life-supporting capacity of fresh water including on any ecosystem associated with fresh water and b. the extent to which it is feasible and dependable that any more than minor adverse effect on fresh water, and on any ecosystem associated with fresh water, resulting from the discharge would be avoided. 2. This policy applies to the following discharges (including a diffuse discharge by any person or animal): a. a new discharge or b. a change or increase in any discharge – of any contaminant into fresh water, or onto or into land in circumstances that may result in that contaminant (or, as a result of any natural process from the discharge of that contaminant, any other contaminant) entering fresh water. 3. This policy does not apply to any application for consent first lodged before the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management takes effect on 1 July 2011. Policy B7 of the NPS on Freshwater Management 1. When considering any application the consent authority must have regard to the following matters: a. the extent to which the change would adversely affect safeguarding the life-supporting capacity of fresh water and of any associated ecosystem and b. the extent to which it is feasible and dependable that any adverse effect on the life- supporting capacity of fresh water and of any associated ecosystem resulting from the change would be avoided. 2. This policy applies to: a. any new activity and b. any change in the character, intensity or scale of any established activity – that involves any taking, using, damming or diverting of fresh water or draining of any wetland which is likely to result in any more than minor adverse change in the natural variability of flows or level of any fresh water, compared to that which immediately preceded the commencement of the new activity or the change in the established activity (or in the case of a change in an intermittent or seasonal activity, compared to that on the last occasion on which the activity was carried out). 3.1 Water Resources 3-5 3.1 Water Resources Background and Explanation The Waikato Region’s distinctive character is largely derived from the scenic and aesthetic impressions of its lakes, rivers and wetlands*. The character of Waikato’s water bodies is diverse, reflecting the large variety of water types including the Waikato River, Lake Taupo, wild rivers, mountain streams and ground water. Associated human uses and values of these water bodies* are diverse and range from domestic and community water supply, irrigation, drainage, electricity generation and waste assimilation through to recreational use and fishing. Water bodies are vitally important to the Region and need to be managed in a sustainable manner. This will ensure that those uses and values, and the natural character of water bodies and their margins, including amenity values, visual characteristics, contact recreation, fisheries, wildlife and aquatic habitat are provided for. The natural environment is an interconnected system and the processes that occur between water, land, and vegetation are complex and interdependent. It is artificial to deal with these as separate components, and efforts have been made in this Plan to identify and maintain the linkages when creating objectives, policies and methods to manage these resources. Water is a key component of the environment as it is the sustainer of life and the transporter in the system. Water is therefore in demand to sustain and promote life, and the transport or carrying role means that poor resource management in one area can impact on a large downstream area. A wide range of resource uses place pressure on water resources. Whilst some water bodies contain naturally high levels of some heavy metals or dissolved colour, the introduction of contaminants* from human uses into water bodies can have a significant effect on water quality. Contaminants can be introduced from either point sources or non-point sources: a) Point sources* include: i) industrial discharges ii) sewage discharges iii) stormwater systems iv) farm effluent discharges b) Non-point sources* include: i) surface run-off from intensive land uses ii) stock in waterways iii) agrichemical application iv) fertiliser application v) leaching from land uses such as agriculture vi) diffuse discharges in urbanised areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strong Iwi Involvement in River Clean-Up Projects
    DECEMBER 2018 A newsletter from the Strong iwi involvement in MESSAGE FROM river clean-up projects THE CE It has been a busy end of year for THE WAIKATO RIVER AUTHORITY HAS ANNOUNCED $6 MILLION FOR RIVER the WRA. We completed our 8th CLEAN-UP PROJECTS IN ITS JUST COMPLETED FUNDING ROUND, WITH MORE funding round and it was great to THAN A THIRD OF THESE PROJECTS BEING IWI LED. see projects successfully lifted from the Restoration Strategy Overall, a total of 38 projects have been The largest project to be funded this year that Environment Minister funded in 2018. is a continuation of the Waipā Catchment Parker launched earlier this year. Authority Co-chairs Hon John Luxton and Plan implementation which will involve Our advocacy for the Vision & Roger Pikia, say a feature of the funding working with approximately 70 farmers Strategy has been pursued across round has been a close alignment with the and landowners within identified priority a number of fora. We held our Restoration Strategy for the Waikato and catchments. The $1.6 million of funding AGM on the back of publishing Waipā rivers and the strong participation will work towards reducing sediment our 2017/18 Annual Report. We of River Iwi. levels going into the Waipā River and its have also received positive media tributaries. Sediment from the Waipā “In recent years there has been a clear coverage across several articles River is a major factor in reducing the trend for successful projects to reflect in as many weeks. One of these water quality in the lower Waikato River.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 32AA Evaluation Report
    Section 32AA Evaluation Report Rezoning Proposal Puketirini, Huntly Terra Firma Resources Ltd Date: 17 February 2021 Terra Firma Resources Limited PO Box 67, Ngaruawahia 3742 New Zealand Tel. +64 274 336 585 Section 32AA Evaluation Report Rezoning Proposal, Puketirini, Huntly PREPARED FOR: Craig Smith Director Terra Firma Resources Ltd PROJECT: Section 32AA Evaluation Report Residential Zoning at Puketirini, Huntly DATE: 17 February 2021 ……………………………………. Lucy Smith Page 2 Section 32AA Evaluation Report Rezoning Proposal, Puketirini, Huntly Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Section 32 of the Resource Management Act 1991 ....................................................................... 6 3. Section 32AA Report Scope and Format ......................................................................................... 7 4. Assessment of Environmental Effects ............................................................................................. 7 5. Outline of Rezoning Proposal ........................................................................................................ 10 6. Relevant PDP Objectives and Policies ........................................................................................... 14 7. Alignment with Higher Order Documents .................................................................................... 20 8. Scale and Significance ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Gazette 983
    3 APRIL NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 983 Decoy limit: No limit. 2. No person shall use or cause to be used fo r the hunting or killing of game on Lake Ngaroto any fixed stand, pontoon, Definition of Areas hide or maimai except within 85 metres of the margin of the Areas A B C and D correspond to those regions formerly lake. known as the Mangonui/Whangaroa, Bay of Islands, Hobson and Whangarei acclimatisation districts respectively as 3. No person shall use or cause to be used fo r the hunting or described by Gazette, No. 78 of 3 December 1970 at pages killing of game on Lake Rotokauri any fixed stand, pontoon, 2364 and 2365. hide or maimai on any open water of the lake. Special Condition 4. It shall be an offence for any person to wilfully leave on the hunting ground any game bird(s) shot or parts of any game 1. No persons shall wilfully leave on the hunting ground any birds shot. game bird(s) shot or parts of any game bird(s) shot. 5. It shall be an offence for any person to herd or drive black swan(s) for the purpose of hunting or killing them. Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Region 6. It shall be an offence to shoot game from any unmoored Reference to Description: Gazette, No. 83 of 24 May 1990 as boat on the Waikato River north of the boat ramp at the amended by Gazette, No. 129, of 29 August 1991, at page confluence of the Mangawara Stream and the Waikato River at 2786 Taupiri on any of the first three days or the second weekend of Game That May be Hunted the open season.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary
    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Signals of Climatic Shifts and Land Use Change from Precipitation and River Discharge Variations: the Whanganui and Waikato Catchments
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. DETECTING SIGNALS OF CLIMATIC SHIFTS AND LAND USE CHANGE FROM PRECIPITATION AND RIVER DISCHARGE VARIATIONS: THE WHANGANUI AND WAIKATO CATCHMENTS A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences at The University of Waikato by Ying Qiao The University of Waikato 2012 III IV Abstract The Whanganui and Waikato river catchments have somewhat different degrees of exposure to the westerly wind systems. It is of interest to determine whether the two regions have similar times of occurrence of any concurrent shifts in river discharge and rainfall, with particular reference to mean value changes. Concurrent rainfall and runoff shifts are indicative of climatic variation but catchment land use changes (which will influence only discharge change) have also been occurring in both catchments, particularly with respect to forest planting or forest clearance.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Fresh Waters: Values, State, Trends and Human Impacts
    OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER’S CHIEF SCIENCE ADVISOR Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, KNZM FRSNZ FMedSci FRS Chief Science Advisor New Zealand’s fresh waters: Values, state, trends and human impacts 12 April 2017 Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor PO Box 108-117, Symonds Street, Auckland 1150, New Zealand Telephone: +64 9 923 6318 Website: www.pmcsa.org.nz Email: [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This set of reports is the result of a lengthy collaborative effort initiated and guided by Sir Peter Gluckman, the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor (PMCSA). Development of the technical report was led by Dr Bryce Cooper, working with Drs Clive Howard-Williams, Scott Larned and John Quinn of the freshwater team at the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), and the Office of the PMCSA. Coordination of the project and preparation of the summary report was led by Dr Anne Bardsley of the Office of the PMCSA, in close collaboration with Dr Ken Hughey, Chief Science Advisor for the Department of Conservation, and Dr David Wratt, Departmental Science Advisor for the Ministry for the Environment. We gratefully acknowledge the input of the following reviewers: David Hamilton, University of Waikato Ken Taylor, AgResearch; Our Land and Water National Science Challenge Roger Young, Cawthron Institute Brett Eaton, University of British Columbia Neil Deans, Ministry for the Environment Wes Patrick, Ministry for the Environment Joanne Perry, Department of Conservation Adam Tipper, Stats NZ We also thank Kristiann Allen
    [Show full text]
  • Hortnz Submission On
    COMMENTS ON PROPOSED WAIKATO REGIONAL PLAN CHANGE 1 WAIKATO AND WAIPA RIVER CATCHMENTS TO: Waikato Regional Council COMMENTS ON: Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 Waikato and Waipa River Catchments NAME: Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) ADDRESS: PO Box 10 232 WELLINGTON 1. HortNZ’s submission, and the decisions sought, are detailed in the attached schedules: 1.1. HortNZ wishes to be heard in support of this submission. 1.2. This submission is supported by a technical report that is to be read in support of this submission. The report has been lodged with the Waikato Regional Council via FTP file Transfer and is titled “Values and Current Allocation of Responsibility For Discharges” Jacobs Technical Report in Support of the Horticulture NZ Submission on Healthy River Plan Change”. 1.3. The Plan and this submission cover a wide range of issues and there are potential consequential amendments that will be required to give effect to the relief sought in this submission. Decision sought: 1.4. Other changes or consequential amendments as are necessary to give effect to the matters raised in this submission. 2. Background to HortNZ and its RMA involvement: 2.1. Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) was established on 1 December 2005, combining the New Zealand Vegetable and Potato Growers’ and New Zealand Fruitgrowers’ and New Zealand Berryfruit Growers’ Federations. 2.2. On behalf of its 5,500 active grower members HortNZ takes a detailed involvement in resource management planning processes as part of its National Environmental Policies. HortNZ works to raise growers’ awareness of the RMA to ensure effective grower involvement under the Act, whether in the planning process or through resource consent applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Growth of Wild-Caught Grass Carp in the Waikato River Catchment
    Age and growth of wild-caught grass carp in the Waikato River catchment Cindy Baker and Joshua Smith DOC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SERIES 238 Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10–420 Wellington, New Zealand DOC Research & Development Series is a published record of scientific research carried out, or advice given, by Department of Conservation staff or external contractors funded by DOC. It comprises reports and short communications that are peer-reviewed. Individual contributions to the series are first released on the departmental website in pdf form. Hardcopy is printed, bound, and distributed at regular intervals. Titles are also listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science and Research. © Copyright April 2006, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1176–8886 ISBN 0–478–14077–0 This is a client report commissioned by Waikato Conservancy and funded from the Science Advice Fund. It was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing and layout by Ian Mackenzie. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Methods 6 3. Results 7 4. Discussion 9 5. Conclusions 10 6. Acknowledgements 10 7. References 11 Age and growth of wild-caught grass carp in the Waikato River catchment Cindy Baker and Joshua Smith National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand ABSTRACT Two relatively small grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) were captured in the lower Waikato River basin, New Zealand: one from Lake Whangape (1.65 kg, 435 mm fork length (FL)), and one from Pungarehu Canal, below the floodgates to Lake Waikare (3.1 kg, 570 mm FL).
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology.Wetland Restoration. a Handbook for New Zealand Freshwater Systems
    CHAPTER 7 HYDROLOGY DAVE CAMPBELL CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 UNDERSTANDING HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN WETLANDS 1.1 Peatlands and hydrology 1.1.1 Peat decomposition 2 HUMAN IMPACTS ON HYDROLOGICAL REGIMES 3 RESTORING YOUR WETLAND 3.1 Developing a Wetland Restoration Plan 3.1.1 Mapping 3.2 Determining wetland type 3.3 Understanding the site 3.3.1 Reference wetland hydrology 3.3.2 Wetland restoration site hydrology 3.4 Setting realistic goals and objectives 3.4.1 Keeping it legal 4 TIPS FOR RESTORING WETLAND HYDROLOGY 5 MONITORING 5.1 Locating monitoring points 5.2 Dipwells, piezometers and reference points 5.3 Monitoring frequency 5.4 The von Post Peat Decomposition Index 6 REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING 6.1 Useful websites SECTION TWO: ACTION ON THE GROUND CHAPTER 7 HYDROLOGY 75 HYDROLOGY WETLAND RESTORATION: A HANDBOOK FOR NZ FRESHWATER SYSTEMS HYDROLOGY DAVE CAMPBELL When applied to wetlands, the science of hydrology a downstream location, either as surface water is concerned with how the storage and movement in streams or groundwater that may emerge in of water into and out of a wetland affects the plants seepages or springs. Wetlands often occur in and animals, and the soils on which they grow. the lower parts of catchments where there is an Most wetland scientists agree that the single most excess of water input so that the water table is important factor determining both wetland type permanently or seasonally close to the ground and function is hydrology. Consequently, changes surface. This includes valley bottoms, low-lying in hydrology are the leading causes of wetland areas alongside streams and rivers, and down degradation or destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • 2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15
    SPORTS FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME REGION 2021 – 2031 AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH & GAME 156 BRYMER RD, RD 9, HAMILTON PH: 07 849 1666 [email protected] www.fishandgame.org.nz Contents: PART 1 BACKGROUND AND RESOURCE SUMMARY How To Use this Plan ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Operation of Plan .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Plan Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Organisational management .................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Fish and Game New Zealand ................................................................................................... 6 2.2. The Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game ................................................................................... 6 3. Legal Context................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Conservation Act 1987 ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Wildlife Act 1953 ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda for a Meeting of the Strategy & Finance Committee to Be Held Via
    1 Agenda for a meeting of the Strategy & Finance Committee to be held via Audio Visual Conference on MONDAY, 6 SEPTEMBER 2021 commencing at 9.30am. 1. APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE 2. CONFIRMATION OF STATUS OF AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Meeting held on Monday, 26 July 2021 5 5. ACTIONS REGISTER 12 6. STRATEGY REPORTS 6.1 Climate Action Progress – August 2021 14 6.2 Hamilton & Waikato Tourism Annual Report to Waikato District Council – 1 July 2020 40 – 30 June 2021 6.3 Changes to Default Growth – High Growth Projection from Waikato Projections 2018- 65 2068 6.4 Economic and Community Development Work Programme Update – August 2021 72 7. FINANCE REPORTS 7.1 Approved Counterparty Review 78 7.2 General Rate Position 80 8. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC 84 GJ Ion CHIEF EXECUTIVE Waikato District Council Strategy & Finance Committee 1 Agenda: 6 September 2021 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE AND DELEGATION Reports to: The Council Chairperson: Cr Janet Gibb Deputy Chairperson: Cr Aksel Bech Membership: The Mayor, all Councillors and Mrs Maxine Moana-Tuwhangai (Maangai Maaori) Meeting frequency: Six-weekly Quorum: Majority of members (including vacancies) Purpose: The Strategy & Finance Committee is responsible for: 1. Monitoring of Council’s strategy, and performance (both financial and non-financial) against the Long Term Plan and Annual Plan. 2. Setting the broad vision and direction of the District, determine specific outcomes that need to be met to deliver on that vision, and develop and monitor strategies to achieve those goals. 3. Determining financial matters within its delegations and Terms of Reference and making recommendations to Council on financial matters outside its authority.
    [Show full text]