DOCSLIB.ORG

Essential Fish Habitat (Efh) Omnibus Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Essential Fish Habitat (Efh) Omnibus Amendment New England Fishery Management Council 50 WATER STREET | NEWBURYPORT, MASSACHUSETTS 01950 | PHONE 978 465 0492 | FAX 978 465 3116 John Pappalardo, Chairman | Paul J. Howard, Executive Director ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH) OMNIBUS AMENDMENT “THE SWEPT AREA SEABED IMPACT (SASI) MODEL: A TOOL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECTS OF FISHING ON ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT” Date: 1 February 2011 This document was prepared by the following members of the NEFMC Habitat Plan Development team, with feedback from the NEFMC Habitat Oversight Committee, NEFMC Habitat Advisory Panel, and interested members of the public. Michelle Bachman, NEFMC staff* Peter Auster, University of Connecticut Chad Demarest, NOAA/Northeast Fisheries Science Center Steve Eayrs, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Kathyrn Ford, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Jon Grabowski, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Brad Harris, University of Massachusetts School of Marine Science and Technology Tom Hoff, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council Mark Lazzari, Maine Department of Marine Resources Vincent Malkoski, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Dave Packer, NOAA/ Northeast Fisheries Science Center David Stevenson, NOAA/Northeast Regional Office Page Valentine, U.S. Geological Survey *Please forward any comments, questions, or suggestions to [email protected] Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF THE SWEPT AREA SEABED IMPACT MODEL ....................... 15 2.0 DEFINING HABITAT ................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Geological habitat component ................................................................................................. 22 2.1.1 Sediments, surface and subsurface .................................................................................. 22 2.1.2 Biogenic depressions and burrows .................................................................................. 22 2.1.3 Bedforms .............................................................................................................................. 23 2.1.4 Gravel and gravel pavements ........................................................................................... 23 2.1.5 Cobble and boulder piles .................................................................................................. 23 2.1.6 Shell deposits ...................................................................................................................... 24 2.2 Biological habitat component .................................................................................................. 24 2.2.1 Amphipods – tube-dwelling ............................................................................................. 25 2.2.2 Anemones – actinarian and cerianthid............................................................................ 26 2.2.3 Ascidians ............................................................................................................................. 28 2.2.4 Brachiopods ......................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.5 Bryozoans ............................................................................................................................ 29 2.2.6 Sea pens ............................................................................................................................... 31 2.2.7 Hydroids .............................................................................................................................. 32 2.2.8 Macroalgae .......................................................................................................................... 36 2.2.9 Mollusks, epifaunal bivalve .............................................................................................. 38 2.2.10 Polychaetes – tube-dwelling ............................................................................................. 39 2.2.11 Sponges ................................................................................................................................ 41 3.0 GEAR IMPACTS LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................ 44 3.1 Methods: database and coding ................................................................................................ 44 3.2 Tabular summary of literature ................................................................................................ 49 4.0 ESTIMATING SUSCEPTIBILITY AND RECOVERY FOR BIOLOGICAL AND GEOLOGICAL FEATURES .................................................................................................... 75 4.1 Methods: S-R matrices .............................................................................................................. 75 4.2 Results: S-R matrices ................................................................................................................. 79 4.2.1 Demersal otter trawls ......................................................................................................... 79 4.2.2 New Bedford-style scallop dredge .................................................................................. 86 4.2.3 Hydraulic clam dredges .................................................................................................... 91 4.2.4 Fixed gears........................................................................................................................... 94 4.2.4.1 Demersal longline and sink gillnet ......................................................................... 95 4.2.4.2 Lobster and deep-sea red crab traps ....................................................................... 97 4.2.4.3 Fixed gear susceptibility summary ....................................................................... 100 4.2.5 Recovery– all gear types .................................................................................................. 102 4.2.6 Summary of vulnerability assessment results .............................................................. 111 4.3 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 120 4.3.1 Literature review .............................................................................................................. 121 4.3.2 Susceptibility ..................................................................................................................... 122 4.3.3 Recovery ............................................................................................................................ 123 4.3.4 Potential sources of bias in the Vulnerability Assessment ......................................... 123 5.0 FISHING GEARS EVALUTED .................................................................................. 125 5.1 Demersal otter trawls .............................................................................................................. 134 5.1.1 Generic otter trawls (including groundfish and scallop trawls) ............................... 135 5.1.2 Shrimp trawls .................................................................................................................... 136 5.1.3 Squid trawls ...................................................................................................................... 136 5.1.4 Raised footrope trawls ..................................................................................................... 137 5.2 New Bedford-style scallop dredges ...................................................................................... 137 5.3 Hydraulic clam dredges ......................................................................................................... 138 5.4 Demersal longlines .................................................................................................................. 138 5.5 Sink gill nets ............................................................................................................................. 139 5.6 Traps .......................................................................................................................................... 140 6.0 ESTIMATING CONTACT-ADJUSTED AREA SWEPT ....................................... 141 6.1 Area swept model specification ............................................................................................ 141 6.1.1 Demersal otter trawl ........................................................................................................ 142 6.1.2 New Bedford-style scallop dredge ................................................................................ 144 6.1.3 Hydraulic clam dredge .................................................................................................... 144 6.1.4 Demersal longline and sink gillnet ................................................................................ 145 6.1.5 Lobster and deep-sea red crab traps .............................................................................. 146 6.2 Data and parameterization .................................................................................................... 147 6.2.1 Demersal otter trawl ........................................................................................................ 147 6.2.2 New Bedford-style scallop dredge ................................................................................ 152 6.2.3 Hydraulic clam dredge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breaking with Tradition: Redefining Measures for Diet Description with a Case Study of the Aleutian Skate Bathyraja Aleutica (Gilbert 1896)
    Environ Biol Fish (2012) 95:3–20 DOI 10.1007/s10641-011-9959-z Breaking with tradition: redefining measures for diet description with a case study of the Aleutian skate Bathyraja aleutica (Gilbert 1896) Simon C. Brown & Joseph J. Bizzarro & Gregor M. Cailliet & David A. Ebert Received: 1 September 2010 /Accepted: 27 October 2011 /Published online: 16 November 2011 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Characterization of fish diets from stomach Aleutian skate Bathyraja aleutica from specimens content analysis commonly involves the calculation of collected from three ecoregions of the northern Gulf multiple relative measures of prey quantity (%N,%W,% of Alaska (GOA) continental shelf during June- FO), and their combination in the standardized Index of September 2005–2007. Aleutian skate were found to Relative Importance (%IRI). Examining the underlying primarily consume the commonly abundant benthic structure of dietary data matrices reveals interdependen- crustaceans, northern pink shrimp Pandalus eous and cies among diet measures, and obviates the advantageous Tanner crab Chionoecetes bairdi, and secondarily use of underused prey-specific measures to diet charac- consume various teleost fishes. Multivariate variance terization. With these interdependencies clearly realized partitioning by Redundancy Analysis revealed spa- as formal mathematical expressions, we proceed to tially driven differences in the diet to be as influential isolate algebraically, the inherent bias in %IRI, and as skate size, sex, and depth of capture. Euphausiids provide a correction for it by substituting traditional and other mid-water prey in the diet were strongly measures with prey-specific measures. The resultant new associated with the Shelikof Strait region during 2007 index, the Prey-Specific Index of Relative Importance (% that may be explained by atypical marine climate PSIRI), is introduced and recommended to replace %IRI conditions during that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Diving in Ancient Egypt
    A Brief History of Underwater Enterprise and Exploration The incentives to risk one’s life underwater from the earliest records of diving: 1) Subsistence and general aquatic harvest 2) Commerce/salvage 3) Warfare A sponge diver about to take the plunge, Classical Greece ca. 500 BCE The beginnings: subsistence in Ancient Egypt: skin divers netting fish in the Nile th Tomb of Djar, 11 Dynasty (ca. 2000 BCE) ‘Pull out well! (It is) a Happy day! Measure you, measure you, for you, good great fishes’ Text and image from the tomb of Ankhtifi (ca. 2100 BCE) The beginnings: other kinds of aquatic/underwater harvest: mother of pearl (left) and sponge diving (right) Mesopotamia (southern Iraq, ca. 2500 BCE) Classical Greece (ca. 500 BCE) The so-called ‘Standard of Ur’: a mosaic of lapis lazuli A sponge diver about to take the (from the exotic region of Afghanistan) and mother of plunge with a knife and a sack, the pearl (from the exotic source of a seabed), deposited in jar was also deposited in an elite tomb an elite tomb in Mesopotamia The beginnings: in search of exotic and high value things (things difficult to access/procure) Epic of Gilgamesh (composed in Mesopotamia no later than ca. 2100 BCE) records a heroic dive after a ‘plant of immortality’ on the seabed ‘He tied heavy stones *to his feet+ They pulled him down into the deep [and he saw the plant] He took the plant though it pricked his hands He cut the heavy stones from his feet The sea cast him up upon the shore’ The value of mother of pearl and sea sponge resides, in part, in the process of procuring them The beginnings: salvaging lost cargoes (lost valuable things) Scyllias and his daughter Hydna: the first professional divers known by name, famed for salvaging huge volumes of gold and silver (tribute and booty) from a Persian fleet in the Aegean that lost many ships in a storm (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponge Fishing in Tarpon Springs, Florida Michael Suver University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Environmental Change and Place-Based Identities: Sponge Fishing in Tarpon Springs, Florida Michael Suver University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Geography Commons Scholar Commons Citation Suver, Michael, "Environmental Change and Place-Based Identities: Sponge Fishing in Tarpon Springs, Florida" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4410 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Environmental Change and Place-Based Identities: Sponge Fishing in Tarpon Springs, Florida by Michael Suver A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography, Environment, and Planning College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Pratyusha Basu, Ph.D. M. Martin Bosman, Ph.D. Jayajit Chakraborty, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 8, 2012 Keywords: climate change, Greek ethnicity, environmental geography, Gulf of Mexico Copyright © 2012, Michael Suver Acknowledgments I could not have completed this thesis without the strength of the Lord which has enabled me to lay aside all of my weight and finish the race set before me. I am also very thankful to Gabrielle, my fiancé who has been an encouragement and a comfort to get me through the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Let Your Light Shine
    The Lutheran Beacon Let your light shine . WWW.SELC.LCMS.ORG Published by the SELC District of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod MAY 2016 St. John (Cudahy WI) Celebrates Slovak Heritage Celebrating Our Life in Christ by Rev. Carl Krueger St. John, Cudahy WI is celebrating 110 years of Ministry! Founded in 1906 by Slovak Immigrants, St. John “kicked-off” this Anniversary observance year with English/Slovak Communion Worship Services led by the “last-remaining-100% Slovak Heritage-full-time-active- Slovak-Pastors”, and a Slovak menu dinner. At the turn of the 20th Century, Slovakia was ruled by the Hungarian Empire, and subjected to political, social, and religious oppression and persecution. The United States was seen as the land of freedom and opportunity. Slovak men made their way to the Milwaukee area Happy Mother’s Day and found work at the Patrick Cudahy Meat Packing Company May 8th slaughtering and processing beef and pork. The men worked long hours, saved money, then sent for their wives and families. Almost every Slovak adult packed their Slovak Bible and their Slovak Hymnal. First, families found homes, then they sought to establish a Church. “The Slovak Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession, St. John the Baptizer” was founded October 1906, with the city of Cudahy established the same year. The Pastor of a near- by German Lutheran Church provided pastoral care and worship services, along with visiting Slovak Pastors from Chicago IL and Whiting IN. To obtain their own Pastor from the Seminary, St. John needed to join the Slovak Evangelical Lutheran Church (SELC).
    [Show full text]
  • In-Situ Observation of Deep Water Corals in the Northern Red Sea Waters of Saudi Arabia
    Deep-Sea Research I 89 (2014) 35–43 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research I journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsri In-situ observation of deep water corals in the northern Red Sea waters of Saudi Arabia Mohammad A. Qurban a,n, P.K. Krishnakumar a, T.V. Joydas a, K.P. Manikandan a, T.T.M. Ashraf a, S.I. Quadri a, M. Wafar a, Ali Qasem b, S.D. Cairns c a Center for Environment and Water, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, P. B. No. 391, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia b Environmental Protection Department, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia c Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, United States of America article info abstract Article history: Three sites offshore of the Saudi Arabia coast in the northern Red Sea were surveyed in November 2012 Received 29 October 2013 to search for deep-water coral (DWC) grounds using a Remotely Operated Vehicle. A total of 156 colonies Received in revised form were positively identified between 400 and 760 m, and were represented by seven species belonging to 30 March 2014 Scleractinia (3), Alcyonacea (3) and Antipatharia (1). The scleractinians Dasmosmilia valida Marenzeller, Accepted 5 April 2014 1907, Eguchipsammia fistula (Alcock, 1902) and Rhizotrochus typus Milne-Edwards and Haime, 1848 were Available online 13 April 2014 identified to species level, while the octocorals Acanthogorgia sp., Chironephthya sp., Pseudopterogorgia Keywords: sp., and the antipatharian Stichopathes sp., were identified to genus level. Overall, the highest abundance Cold water corals of DWC was observed at Site A1, the closest to the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep‐Sea Coral Taxa in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico: Depth and Geographical Distribution
    Deep‐Sea Coral Taxa in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico: Depth and Geographical Distribution by Peter J. Etnoyer1 and Stephen D. Cairns2 1. NOAA Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Charleston, SC 2. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC This annex to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico chapter in “The State of Deep‐Sea Coral Ecosystems of the United States” provides a list of deep‐sea coral taxa in the Phylum Cnidaria, Classes Anthozoa and Hydrozoa, known to occur in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico (Figure 1). Deep‐sea corals are defined as azooxanthellate, heterotrophic coral species occurring in waters 50 m deep or more. Details are provided on the vertical and geographic extent of each species (Table 1). This list is adapted from species lists presented in ʺBiodiversity of the Gulf of Mexicoʺ (Felder & Camp 2009), which inventoried species found throughout the entire Gulf of Mexico including areas outside U.S. waters. Taxonomic names are generally those currently accepted in the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS), and are arranged by order, and alphabetically within order by suborder (if applicable), family, genus, and species. Data sources (references) listed are those principally used to establish geographic and depth distribution. Only those species found within the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Exclusive Economic Zone are presented here. Information from recent studies that have expanded the known range of species into the U.S. Gulf of Mexico have been included. The total number of species of deep‐sea corals documented for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioluminescence and Fluorescence of Three Sea Pens in the North-West
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.08.416396; this version posted December 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bioluminescence and fluorescence of three sea pens in the north-west Mediterranean sea Warren R Francis* 1, Ana¨ısSire de Vilar 1 1: Dept of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Bioluminescence of Mediterranean sea pens has been known for a long time, but basic parameters such as the emission spectra are unknown. Here we examined bioluminescence in three species of Pennatulacea, Pennatula rubra, Pteroeides griseum, and Veretillum cynomorium. Following dark adaptation, all three species could easily be stimulated to produce green light. All species were also fluorescent, with bioluminescence being produced at the same sites as the fluorescence. The shape of the fluorescence spectra indicates the presence of a GFP closely associated with light production, as seen in Renilla. Our videos show that light proceeds as waves along the colony from the point of stimulation for all three species, as observed in many other octocorals. Features of their bioluminescence are strongly suggestive of a \burglar alarm" function. Introduction Bioluminescence is the production of light by living organisms, and is extremely common in the marine environment [Haddock et al., 2010, Martini et al., 2019]. Within the phylum Cnidaria, biolumiescence is widely observed among the Medusazoa (true jellyfish and kin), but also among the Octocorallia, and especially the Pennatulacea (sea pens).
    [Show full text]
  • Voestalpine Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for PSD Greenhouse Gas Permit
    Essential Fish Habitat Assessment: Texas Project Site voestalpine Stahl GmbH San Patricio County, Texas January 31, 2013 www.erm.com voestalpine Stahl GmbH Essential Fish Habitat Assessment: Texas Project Site January 31, 2013 Project No. 0172451 San Patricio County, Texas Alicia Smith Partner-in-Charge Graham Donaldson Project Manager Travis Wycoff Project Consultant Environmental Resources Management 15810 Park Ten Place, Suite 300 Houston, Texas 77084-5140 T: 281-600-1000 F: 281-600-1001 Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-2393 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VI 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PROPOSED ACTION 1 1.2 AGENCY REGULATIONS 1 1.2.1 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1 1.2.1 Essential Fish Habitat Defined 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 2.1 PROJECT SCHEDULE 4 2.2 PROJECT LOCATION 4 2.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.4 SITE HISTORY 7 2.5 EMISSIONS CONTROLS 8 2.6 NOISE 9 2.7 DUST 10 2.8 WATER AND WASTEWATER 10 2.8.1 Water Sourcing and Water Rights 11 2.8.2 Wastewater Discharge 13 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF THE ACTION AREA 15 3.1 ACTION AREA DEFINED 15 3.2 ACTION AREA DELINEATION METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 16 3.2.1 Significant Impact Level Dispersion Modeling 16 3.2.2 Other Contaminants 17 4.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT 19 4.1 SPECIES OF PARTICULAR CONCERN 19 4.1.1 Brown Shrimp 19 4.1.2 Gray Snapper 20 4.1.3 Pink Shrimp 20 4.1.4 Red Drum 20 4.1.5 Spanish Mackerel 21 4.1.6 White Shrimp 21 4.2 HABITAT AREAS OF PARTICULAR CONCERN 22 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE CONDITIONS AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sea Coral Taxa in the U. S. Caribbean Region: Depth And
    Deep‐Sea Coral Taxa in the U. S. Caribbean Region: Depth and Geographical Distribution By Stephen D. Cairns1 1. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC An update of the status of the azooxanthellate, heterotrophic coral species that occur predominantly deeper than 50 m in the U.S. Caribbean territories is not given in this volume because of lack of significant additional data. However, an updated list of deep‐sea coral species in Phylum Cnidaria, Classes Anthozoa and Hydrozoa, from the Caribbean region (Figure 1) is presented below. Details are provided on depth ranges and known geographic distributions within the region (Table 1). This list is adapted from Lutz & Ginsburg (2007, Appendix 8.1) in that it is restricted to the U. S. territories in the Caribbean, i.e., Puerto Rico, U. S. Virgin Islands, and Navassa Island, not the entire Caribbean and Bahamian region. Thus, this list is significantly shorter. The list has also been reordered alphabetically by family, rather than species, to be consistent with other regional lists in this volume, and authorship and publication dates have been added. Also, Antipathes americana is now properly assigned to the genus Stylopathes, and Stylaster profundus to the genus Stenohelia. Furthermore, many of the geographic ranges have been clarified and validated. Since 2007 there have been 20 species additions to the U.S. territories list (indicated with blue shading in the list), mostly due to unpublished specimens from NMNH collections. As a result of this update, there are now known to be: 12 species of Antipatharia, 45 species of Scleractinia, 47 species of Octocorallia (three with incomplete taxonomy), and 14 species of Stylasteridae, for a total of 118 species found in the relatively small geographic region of U.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Water Scleractinia (Cnidaria : Anthozoa) from Southern Biscay Bay
    Cah. Biol. Mar. (1994), 35: 461-469 Roscoff Deep-water Scleractinia (Cnidaria : Anthozoa) from southern Biscay Bay C. Alvarez-Claudio Departamento de Biologfa de Organismos y Sistemas, Zoologfa, Universi dad de Oviedo, 35005 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain Abstract : Fifteen ahermatypic sc1eractinian species belonging to 5 famili es were collected from 25 stations in a small area of Central Cantabrian coast off Asturias (southem Biscay Bay) . The spec imens were obtained From the continental shelf and slope (depth range 50-1347 m) by means of an anchor-dredge and epibenthic sledge. Résumé: Quinze espèces de Sc1éractiniaires ahermatypiques appartenant à cinq familles ont été récoltées en 25 stations d'une petite aire de la côte Cantabrique centrale au large des Asturies (partie Sud du Golfe de Gascogne). Les récoltes, sur le plateau et le talus continentaux, ont été faites au moyen d'une drague et d'un traîneau épiben­ tique à des profondeurs de 50 à 1347 m. INTRODUCTION The scleractinian coral fauna of the North eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean has been revised by Zibrowius (1980). He reported 34 species from Biscay Bay, most of them already collected by the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of twentieth century. Based on collections from BIOGAS (POLYGAS) and INCAL cruises Zibrowius (1985) further reported 17 species in depths ranging from 400 to 4829 m, all of them previously recorded in the Biscay Bay. These earlier accounts did not specially reflect the faunal richness of relatively small areas. Given sorne hydrodynamic singularities recently described in the southern Biscay Bay (Botas et al. , 1989, 1990 ; Fermindez et al., 1993) benthos studies carried out along the Central Cantabrian shelf and slope are of particular interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a New Synthesis of Evolutionary Relationships and Classification of Scleractinia
    J. Paleont., 75(6), 2001, pp. 1090±1108 Copyright q 2001, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/01/0075-1090$03.00 TOWARDS A NEW SYNTHESIS OF EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCLERACTINIA JAROSèAW STOLARSKI AND EWA RONIEWICZ Instytut Paleobiologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland ,[email protected]., ,[email protected]. ABSTRACTÐThe focus of this paper is to provide an overview of historical and modern accounts of scleractinian evolutionary rela- tionships and classi®cation. Scleractinian evolutionary relationships proposed in the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries were based mainly on skeletal data. More in-depth observations of the coral skeleton showed that the gross-morphology could be highly confusing. Profound differences in microstructural and microarchitectural characters of e.g., Mesozoic microsolenine, pachythecaliine, stylophylline, stylinine, and rhipidogyrine corals compared with nominotypic representatives of higher-rank units in which they were classi®ed suggest their separate (?subordinal) taxonomic status. Recent application of molecular techniques resulted in hypotheses of evolutionary relationships that differed from traditional ones. The emergence of new and promising research methods such as high- resolution morphometrics, analysis of biochemical skeletal data, and re®ned microstructural observations may still increase resolution of the ``skeletal'' approach. Achieving a more reliable and comprehensive scheme of evolutionary relationships and classi®cation
    [Show full text]