DOCSLIB.ORG

Collection Highlights,” San Jose Museum of Art, CA, Nov.-Dec

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collection Highlights,” San Jose Museum of Art, CA, Nov.-Dec NAME: Richard Shaw (415) 456-8767 Activity from academic years 02/03, 03/04, 04/05 have been bolded. EDUCATION: B.F.A., San Francisco Art Institute, 1965 M.F.A., University of California at Davis, 1968 POSITIONS HELD: 1987- Professor, University of California at Berkeley 1978 Lecturer, University of California at Davis 1977 Lecturer, College of Marin, Kentfield, California 1971 Lecturer, University of Wisconsin at Madison 1970 Lecturer, University of California at Berkeley 1966-87 Instructor, San Francisco Art Institute HONORS AND AWARDS: 2002 Marin Arts Council Board Award, San Rafael, CA, Dec. 5 1998 Fellow of the American Crafts Council, New York, NY 1996 Falkirk Annual Life Member Award, Falkirk Cultural Center, San Rafael, CA 1988 Honorary Doctor of Fine Arts Degree, San Francisco Art Institute 1987 Visiting Artist Grant, Atelier Experimental de Researche et de Creation, Manufacture Nationale de Sevres, Paris, France 1974 Visual Artist Fellowship for Crafts, National Endowment for the Arts 1973 Research Grant, Union of Independent Colleges of Art 1971 Visual Artist Fellowship, National Endowment for the Arts RESIDENCIES: (Selected) 2004 Starr Residency, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, March 2003 Anderson Ranch, Aspen, CO, Aug. 18-29 2002 Public Glass, San Francisco, CA 2001 Magnolia Editions, Oakland, CA 1998 Shigaraki Cultural Ceramic Park, Shigaraki, Japan 1997 Artist in Residence, Phillips Academy, Andover, MA 1996 Collaboration, Magnolia Editions, Oakland, CA 1995 University of Hawaii, Honolulu. “East Meets West” Ceramic Symposium Anderson Ranch, Aspen, CO 1977 Visiting Artist Grant, Clayworks, New York, NY 1978 SOLO EXIBITIONS AND TWO PERSON COLLABORATIONS: 2005Richard and Martha Shaw, Sataka Garo, Sacarmento, CASept 6-Oct. 1 Davis & Cline Gallery, It Ain’t Necessarily So,” Ashland, OR Aug. 5-Sept 17 Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA, Jan. 19-Feb. 19 2004 Shorenstein Concourse Gallery, San Francisco, CA Feb. 7-Apr. 3 “Short Order,” Sierra College Ridley Gallery, Oct. 26-Nov. 18 2003 Frank Lloyd Gallery, Santa Monica, CA, Nov. 29-Jan. 10 Mobilia Gallery, Cambridge, MA, Sept. 2-30 2002 Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA 2001Frank Lloyd Gallery, Santa Monica, CA Garo Sakata Gallery, Sacramento, CA “Collaborations,” Richard Shaw, Robert Hudson, Byron Cohen Gallery for Contemporary Art and Sherry Leedy Gallery, Kansas City, MO 2000 Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA “Robert Hudson and Richard Shaw, New Ceramic Sculpture,” Hand Workshop Art Center, Richmond, VI. 1999 Perimeter Gallery, Chicago, IL. Richard Shaw/Tom Rippon, Mobilia Gallery, Cambridge, MA Robert Hudson/Richard Shaw “Team Works” Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, San Francisco, CA 1998 Richard Shaw, a Survey, George Adams Gallery, NYC. Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA Tempe Arts Center, Tempe AZ Robert Hudson and Richard Shaw, “New Ceramic Sculpture”, Bakalar Gallery, Massachusetts College of Art, Boston, MA 1997 Robert Hudson and Richard Shaw, “New Ceramic Sculpture”, Addison Gallery, Andover, MA 1996 Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA Falkirk Annual Life Member, Falkirk Cultural Center,San Rafael, CA 1995 Perimetr Gallery, Chicago, IL 1993 Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA 1992 Frumkin/Adams Gallery, New York; Helander Gallery, Palm Beach, FL 1991 Fullerton Museum Center, CA 1990 Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco; Frumkin Adams Gallery, New York Howard Yezerski Gallery, Boston Palo Alto Cultural Center, CA Schneider Museum of Art, Ashland, OR 1989 Thomas Segal Gallery, Boston 1988 Allan Frumkin Gallery, New York Braunstein Quay Gallery, San Francisco Nevada Museum of Art, Reno University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA 1987 Foster/White Gallery, Seattle, WA 1988 Grand Rapids Art Museum, Grand Rapids, MI 1989 Bergstrom-Mahler Museum, Neenah, WI Tucson Museum of Art, Tucson, AZ Palm Springs Desert Museum, Palm Springs, CA Honolulu Contemporary Art Center, Honolulu, HI 1986 Emerson Museum of Art, Syracuse, NY Braunstein Gallery, San Francisco, CA Scottsdale Center for the Arts, Scottsdale, AZ Huntsville Museum of Art, Huntsville, AL Allan Frumkin Gallery, New York, NY Art Museum of South Texas, Corpus Christi, TX 1985 Asher/Faure Gallery, Los Angeles, CA 1984 Braunstein/Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA Morgan Gallery, Kansas City, MO 1983 Madison Art Center, Madison, WI 1982 Alberta College of Art, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Greenberg Gallery, St. Louis, MO Mendel Gallery, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Boise Gallery of Art, Boise, ID 1981 San Jose Museum of Art, San Jose, CA Newport Harbor Art Museum, Newport Beach, CA Braunstein/Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA 1980 Allan Frumkin Gallery, New York, NY 1979 Belson-Brown Gallery, Ketchum, ID Michael Berger Gallery, Pittsburgh, PA Braunstein/Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA 1977 Jacqueline Anhalt Gallery, Los Angeles, CA 1976 Braunstein/Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA Braunstein/Quay Gallery, New York, NY 1974 E.G. Gallery, Kansas City, MO 1973 San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, CA Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA 1971 Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA 1970 Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA 1968 Dilexi Gallery, San Francisco, CA 1967 San Francisco Art Institute, CA “Richard Shaw/Ceramic Sculpture” Traveling Richard Shaw, Illusionism in Clay: 1971-85,” Traveling GROUP EXHIBITIONS: 2005 “Contemporary Codex: Ceramics and the Book,” Manchester Craftman’s Guild, Pittsburgh, PA Pyramid Atlantic Art Gallery, Silver Springs, MD University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, Mar. Craftsmen’s, NJ, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD “Looking Back and Seeing Forward,” A 90th Anniversary Exhibition, Charles Campbell Gallery, San Francisco, CA, Jan. 11-Feb. 19 “I Hope You Learned Your Lesson,” Sonoma Valley Museum of Art, Sonoma, CA, Jan. 22-Feb. 27 “Faculty Show 2005,” Worth-Ryder Gallery, Feb. 8-Mar. 4 “Terra Sutra II,” The Montage Gallery, Baltimore, MD, Feb. 25-Mar. 19 “Body Language,” George Adams Gallery, NY, NY, Mar. 4-Apr. 30 “More Than A Game: The Art of Baseball,” George Krevsky Gallery, SF, CA, Mar. 31-Apr. 30 “Scents of Purpose: 2005 Spice Box Invitational,” Contemporary Jewish Museum, San Francisco, CA, Apr.-Aug “The Toki Collection: A Bay Area Perspective on Ceramics,” Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill, CA, April “From Tiles to Totems: A Century of Northern California Ceramics,” The Art Foundry Gallery, Sacramento, CA, Apr. 1-May 1 Pence Gallery, Davis, CA, Apr. 29-May 30 “30 Ceramic Sculptors,” John Natsulas Gallery, Davis, CA, May-June “Sevres @ Sevres: Cinquante Ans de Creation Contemporaire,” Musee National de Ceramique, Sevres, France, May-Jun. “Seventh Annual Realism Invitational,” Jenkins/Johnson Gallery, SF, CA, Jun. 2-Jul. 16 “The True Artist is an Amazing Luminous Foundation, Selected Works from the di Rosa Preserve: Art & Nature, di Rosa Preserve Sept, 12, 04- May 8, 05, Palm Springs Desert Museum Jun. 21-Aug. 14, Santa Cruz Museum of Art and History Oct. 8-Nov. 27 2004 “Masters of Illusion: 150 Years of Trompe L’Oeil in America,” Kresge Art Museum, Michigan State U., MI, East Lancing, MI, Jan. 10-Mar. 20 “Standing Room Only,” Ruth Williamson Gallery, Claremont, CA, Jan. 24-Apr. 4 “The Artful Teapot,” Mint Museum of Craft & Design, Charlotte, NC, Feb. 1-Jun. 1 “Humor, Irony and Wit,” Herberger College of Fine Arts, Arizona State University, Feb. 27-Jun. 5 “Art, Artists and the Addison,” Addison Gallery of Art, Andover, MA, Mar 30-Jul 31 “TB9, 1963-2003,” Pence Gallery, Davis, CA, Apr. 17-May 22 “The True Artist is an Amazing Luminous Foundation, Selected Works from the di Rosa Preserve: Art & Nature, Kreeger Museum, Washington, DC, catalog, Apr. 21-Jul. 31 “The Eve Aesthetic: Contemporary Ceramic Sculpture by Artists from “Contemporary Codex,” Central Michigan University, May 14-Jun. 29 “30 Ceramic Sculptors,” John Natsulas Gallery, Davis, CA, May-June “Sixth Annual Realism Invitational,” Jenkins/Johnson Gallery, SF, CA, Jun. 3-Jul. 10 “We’re Ten and a Billion,” Heritage Bank of Commerce, San Jose, CA, Aug. 4 “21st Century Ceramics in the US and Canada,” American Ceramic So., Columbus College of Art and Design, Columbus, OH, Oct. 10-Dec. 7 2003 “20th Anniversary Exhibition,” Bolinas Museum, CA, Jan. 11-Mar. 2 “Visual Alchemy,” Oakland Art Gallery, Oakland CA, Jan. 14-Feb. 8 “Sprung,” Worth/Ryder Gallery, UC Berkeley, CA, Feb. 5-28 “Short Stories,” Cen. for Ceramic Art, Berkeley, CA, Feb. 19-Mar. 30 “Generations: Impending Lineage,” Art & Industry Gallery, San Diego, CA. Mar. 11-15 “The Not-So-Still Life,” Pasadena Museum of California Art, Pasadena, CA, Mar.6-June 27 “The Legacy of Modern Ceramics,” Ceramic Cultural Park, Gifu, Japan, Jan. 25-Mar. 29 “The Artful Teapot,” Museum of Ceramic Art, Ontario, Canada, Feb. 7-May 5 “The International Art Teapot Exhibition,” Taipei County Yingge Ceramics Museum, Taipei Taiwan, Apr. 6- Oct. 1 “30 Ceramic Sculptors,” John Natsulas Gallery, Davis, CA, May-June “The Opening of The Racine Art Museum,” Racine, WI, May 11 “Beauty: New Expressions-Rich Traditions,” SOFA, NY, The Seventy Regiment Armory, May 29-Jun. 1 “The Artful Teapot,” Long Beach Museum of Art, CA, Jun. 20-Sept. 14 “The Other Side,” B. Sakata Garo Gallery, Sacramento, CA, Sept. 2-30 “Multiple Artists,” George Adams Gallery, NY, NY, Sept. 5-Oct. 4 “Twenty First Century Ceramics in the United States and Canada,” Columbus College of Art and Design, Oct. 1-Dec. 7 “The Teapot Redefined,” SOFA Chicago Cultural Center, IL, Oct. 17-19 “The Artful Teapot,” Chicago Cultural Center, IL, Oct. 18-Jan. 4, 2004 “Branch Out,” Braunstein/Quay Gallery, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 5-30 “Revealing Influences,” Museum of Craft & Folk Art, SF, CA, Aug. 27-Nov. 15 “The Not-So-Still Life,” San Jose Museum of Art, CA, Nov. 22-Feb. 15, “New Genres: Twenty Years of the Rutgers Archive for Printmaking Studios,” Jane Voorhees Zimmerali4 Art Museum, New Brunswick, NJ, December 7, 2003 – March 21, 2004 2002 “Something/Anything,” Matthew Marks Gallery, New York, NY, July 1 “The Erotic Life of Clay: Sex Pots,” SF State University Fine Arts Gallery, SF, CA, September “The Teapot Redefined,” SOFA Chicago Cultural Center, IL, Oct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report
    SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-‐1 Historic Resources Evaluation
    Appendix 3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION SEAWALL LOT 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project San Francisco, California April 11, 2016 Prepared by San Francisco, California Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall Lot 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project, San Francisco, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 IV. Property Description ................................................................................................... ….....6 V. Historical Context ....................................................................................................... ….....24 VI. Determination of Eligibility.................................................................................... ……....44 VII. Evaluation of the Project for Compliance with the Standards ............................. 45 VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 58 IX. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 59 April 11, 2016 Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Whyte Oral History Transcript
    i San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Regional Oral History Office 75th Anniversary The Bancroft Library Oral History Project University of California, Berkeley SFMOMA 75th Anniversary: ROBERT WHYTE SFMOMA Staff, 1967-1987 Supervisor of Education, 1967- Director of Education, 1980- Interviews conducted by Lisa Rubens in 2006—2007 Copyright © 2008 by San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Funding for the Oral History Project provided in part by Koret Foundation. ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Robert Whyte, dated May 18, 2008. This manuscript is made available for research purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mbtma 2017 Annual Report
    Mission Bay Annual Report 2017 Executive Summary Mission Bay is will be largely completed by the end of 2019. As of December 2017, all residential units originally entitled are completed and occupied. Over a third of those units are affordable housing which prioritizes seniors living on fixed incomes, formerly homeless, and low-income families with children. Mission Bay’s residential population now tops 14,000. The Mission Bay project area is also entitled for 4.6 million square feet of commercial office and retail space. Approximately 2 million square feet is completed and occupied and the remainder is under construction. One 600,000 SF commercial property, The Exchange, will open in mid-2018. The 18,000 seat Chase Event Center started construction in 2017 and is on a fast track to open by Fall, 2019. A 200+ room hotel, and the remaining commercial properties (UCSF on Illinois Street, Uber headquarters on Third Street, and the Chase Center office towers) all have similar 18-to-24-month construction schedules. Over 15,000 people now work in Mission Bay. Approximately one third work in commercial buildings which are associated with the Mission Bay TMA and are located along Mission Bay Boulevard, Terry Francois Boulevard, Illinois Street and Owens Street. Two-thirds of workers at Mission Bay are employed by UCSF. Mission Bay’s diverse employment base includes everything from high tech office to medical research and corporate headquarters to non-profit organizations and government offices. The neighborhood’s growing ‘ground floor retail’, restaurants, and the new hotel will also bring hundreds of low income service workers to the community.
    [Show full text]
  • RFP Appendix F.Pdf
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SEAWALL LOT 337 DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Appendix F Transportation Demand Management Program Submittal Requirements Introduction The Seawall Lot 337 Mixed Use Project offers great opportunity to develop thoughtful, effective, and integrated strategies for managing transportation demand, which should serve as a model for Mission Bay and other major mixed use development areas. There has been and continues to be major planned public investment to expand public transit service, and bicycle and pedestrian access to AT&T Park, Mission Bay and along the waterfront, with numerous nearby connections to the regional transit network. As expressed in the RFP Objectives, Respondents are required to include a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDMP), that presents a comprehensive and integrated approach to planning and managing transportation demands associated with this Mixed Use Project, and addresses transportation and parking needs associated with AT&T Ballpark. This document provides direction on the issues and elements that must be addressed in the TDMP submittal. A TDMP alone cannot result in transit-oriented development. The land use plan must incorporate smart land use measures such as clustering residential development around neighborhood-serving retail and transit stops. The design and placement of these uses should make alternative transportation a convenient and efficient way to travel to and within the SWL 337 and Pier 48 area, with attractive and comfortable amenities. Fortunately, SWL 337 is a large development site which affords many ways to configure land uses, and design buildings, public spaces and streets to prioritize access and use of public transit, walking and non-motorized circulation as a means of everyday transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC ANALYSIS REPORT the Role of Shuttle Services in San F Rancisco’S Transportation System
    FINALAR S 08/09–2 • JUNE 28, 2011 • PAGE 1 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 100 Van Ness Avenue, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 TEL 415.522.4800 FAX 415.522.4829 EMAIL [email protected] WEB www.sfcta.org FINAL SAR 08/09–2 STRATEGIC ANALYSIS REPORT The Role of Shuttle Services in San F rancisco’s Transportation System Initiated by Commissioner Dufty APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY BOARD JUNE 28, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT SARS: PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT Strategic Analysis Reports (SARs) are carried out at the re- ABOUT SARS: PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT 1 quest of the Authority Board, to frame current issues of concern and to inform policy development regarding spe- INTRODUCTION 2 cific transportation issues which may not be adequately ad- dressed by existing regulations or policy. This SAR, initiated I. BACKGROUND 2 at the request of Commissioner Dufty, analyzes the topic of shuttle services in San Francisco, and seeks to determine II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 how best to integrate the growth of shuttles into the overall transportation system, and to manage their operations, in a III. POLICY ANALYSIS 10 way that continues to realize their benefits while address- ing their impacts. Data for this SAR was gathered through IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS 14 literature review, field observations, and extensive outreach to various stakeholders involved in the shuttle landscape BIBLIOGRAPHY, CITY DEPARTMENT STAFF including providers, operators, users, public agencies, and CONSULTED, STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED 15 the general public. The study finds that, while shuttles play a valuable role in the overall San Francisco transportation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 16 system, policy guidance and improved management are needed and warranted in order to improve operations and APPENDICES 17 minimize impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 a Note from the Director
    di Rosa Center for Contemporary Art 5200 Sonoma Highway Napa, CA 94559 707-226-5991 dirosaart.org BE NOT @dirosaart / #BeNotStill Executive Director: Robert Sain Exhibition and Graphic Designer: Jon Sueda Editor: Lindsey Westbrook Printer: Solstice Press, Oakland Images: Courtesy the artists and di Rosa Center for Contemporary Art STILL: LIVING IN UN- CERTAIN TIMES Part 1 A Note from the Director This is a milestone moment for di Rosa, which has recently recast itself as a center for contemporary art with a focus on the power of ideas, pursued through new commissions and a fresh approach to our rich collection of seminal Bay Area work. We aspire to spark both experimentation and social engagement. As we collectively try to make sense of today’s polarized culture, conflicting values, distortions of truth, denials of science, and pervasive strains of anti- intellectualism, now all heightened in California by the trauma of the devastating wildfires, we at di Rosa feel compelled to show why art matters. We need to demonstrate how artists can be a resource and an asset to the pressing concerns of our time. And we need to rethink the role of cultural organizations and the civic dimension they can embrace by serving as a convener on both the local and the global stage, bringing together multiple perspectives and people from all ages and walks of life. In pursuit of such lofty and necessary goals, di Rosa is pleased to present the landmark exhibition Be Not Still: Living in Uncertain Times. We regard it as a launchpad for a future that dares to make art essential to the human experience.
    [Show full text]
  • VII. Variants to the Proposed Project D
    VII. Variants to the Proposed Project D. Variant 3A TABLE VII.D.3 ¯ ESTIMATED VEHICULAR EMISSIONS FROM VARIANT 3A TRAFFIC IN 2015 BAAQMD Threshold Project Variant 3A Pollutant Ob/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 80/a/ 865 860 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 80/a/ 1,324 1,371 Particulate Matter (PM~0) 80/a/ 1,968 1,958 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550/b/ 12,228 12,163 Notes: a. The BAAQMD regards this amount of emissions as a threshold of significance for a regional impact. b. For carbon monoxide, the BAAQMD does not regard 550 lb/day as a threshold of significance, but rather, an indicator to perform microanalysis. Source: EIP Associates. Based on modeling using the California Air Resources Board’s URBEMIS version 5 model. TABLE VII.D.4 ¯ ESTIMATED LOCAL CO CONCENTRATIONS AT SELECTED INTERSECTIONS IN 2015 FOR VARIANT 3A Proposed Project (ppm)/a/ Variant 3A (ppm) Intersection One-Hour Eight-Hour One-Hour Eight-Hour Third and 16th Streets 11.0 6.3 10.9 6.2 Third and King Streets 13.6 7.6 13.4 7.4 Fourth and Bryant Streets 8.3 5.3 8.4 5.3 Notes: ppm = parts per million. a. Refer to Table V.F.5 and associated text in "Criteria Air Pollutants" under Section V.F, Air Quality: Impacts. Source: EIP Associates. 96.771E VII.31g El!’ 10073 MISSION BAY SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 VII. Variants to the Proposed Project D. Variant 3A In this variant, the decrease in overall traffic would slightly reduce toxic air contaminant emissions from mobile sources.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Environmental Setting and Impacts E. Transportation Impacts Passenger Trips
    V. Environmental Setting and Impacts E. Transportation Impacts passenger trips. Following the BART strike in September, 1997, AC Transit transbay ridership increased substantially, and has stabilized in recent months at a higher level than before the strike. The expected growth in passenger trips, however, has not been reassessed, and the 9,000 to 12,000 additional trips represent a smaller proportion of the revised current ridership. Therefore, expected growth between 1997 and 2010 yields a growth rate of 80% to 110%./82/ AC Transit’s growth estimate assumes that the additional capacity BART will gain with smaller headways will consist primarily of trains traveling on the Dublin/Pleasanton Line. This would mean that a large portion of transbay travel demand growth to the northern part of AC Transit’s service area could not be directly accommodated by BART. However, BART’s Short Range Transit Plan suggests that it will be able to accommodate more transbay demand growth than AC Transit predicts. Therefore, a total cumulative growth rate of 80% was assumed over the next 13 years for AC Transit rather than the larger rate. This corresponds to an annual growth of approximately 4.6%. Currently, there are no plans to increase the number of buses or transbay bus runs in the future. Continued growth in demand may prompt a reevaluation of the service provided. An 80% increase in cumulative passenger trips during the p.m. peak hour would increase the current 83% average load factor to 150%. If all eastbound transbay buses were equally loaded, a load factor of 150% would translate to approximately 23 s’tandees per bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Appeals, City & County of San Francisco
    BOARD OF APPEALS, CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Appeal No. 1S..187 Appellant(s) vs. Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT on November 19, 2015, the above named appellant(s) filed an appeal with the Board of Appeals of the City and County of San Francisco from the decision or order of the above named department(s), commission, or officer. The substance or effect of the decision or order appealed from is the ISSUANCE on November 10, 2015 to GSW Arena, LLC , of a Place of Entertainment Permit (for a mixed use event center open seven days a week from 7:00 AM to 2:00 AM, with proposed entertainment to include family shows, professional basketball games, collegiate athletic events, and concerts, and with food and beverages served on-site, including alcoholic beverages) at Mission Bay South Blocks 29 & 31. PERMIT NO. EC-1352 FOR HEARING ON December 09, 2015 Address of Appellant(s): Address of Other Parties: Mission Bay Alliance , Appellant GSW Arena, LLC, Permit Holder c/o Thomas Lippe, Attorney for Appellant c/o Mary Murphy, Attorney for Permit Holder Law Offices of Thomas Lippe Gibson Dunn 201 Mission Street, 12th Floor 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105 San Francisco, CA 94105 BOARD ()F A.PPEALS Date Filed: OV 1 9 'ut:J CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO APPEAL# / ~~t n BOARD OF APPEALS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF APPEAL I I We, Mission Bay Alliance, hereby appeal the following departmental action: CONDITIONAL GRANT of a Place of Entertainment Permit by the Entertainment Commission which was issued or became effective on : November 10, 2015, to: GSW Arena, LLC , for the property located at: Mission Bay South Blocks 29 & 31.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Timetable for Development of the Proposed Phd Program, Including Enrollment Projections
    PROPOSAL FOR A PROGRAM OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCES LEADING TO THE PHD DEGREE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCES (GHS) September 24, 2014 PhD Program Director: Sally Rankin, RN, PhD, FAAN Faculty Associate Global Health Sciences Professor Emeritus, School of Nursing [email protected] GHS Directors: Jaime Sepúlveda, MD, MPH, MSc, DrSc Executive Director Global Health Sciences [email protected] Molly Cooke, MD, MACP Education Director Global Health Sciences Professor, Department of Medicine [email protected] Colin Boyle, MBA Deputy Director Global Health Sciences [email protected] Lead Administrative Staff: Karen Nelson, MA Special Projects Global Health Sciences [email protected] 1 Table of Contents SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Aims and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Historical Development of the Field .................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 UCSF Global Health Sciences ......................................................................... 7 1.3 Timetable for Development of the Proposed PhD Program, Including Enrollment Projections ............................................................................................................................11 1.4 Relationship of the Proposed Program
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Office 75Th Anniversary the Bancroft Library Oral History Project University of California, Berkeley
    San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Regional Oral History Office 75th Anniversary The Bancroft Library Oral History Project University of California, Berkeley SFMOMA 75th Anniversary AGNES BOURNE SFMOMA Board of Trustees, 1984-1985, 1987-1991 Ex Officio Trustee, SECA, 1984-1985 Trustee, 1987-1991 Interview conducted by Richard Cándida Smith and Janet Bishop in 2009 Copyright © 2010 by San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Funding for the Oral History Project provided in part by Koret Foundation. ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Agnes Bourne, dated February 1, 2010.
    [Show full text]