DOCSLIB.ORG

16808/13 OT/Hl 1 DG B 1 COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN UNION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
16808/13 OT/Hl 1 DG B 1 COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL OF Brussels, 27 November 2013 THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. en) 16808/13 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0136 (COD) AGRI 781 VETER 114 AGRILEG 161 ANIMAUX 35 SAN 480 CODEC 2703 NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Delegations Subject: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Animal Health Delegations will find in Annex a non-paper from the Commission services. 16808/13 OT/hl 1 DG B 1 EN ANNEX Non- paper List of diseases Version: 13 November 2013 16808/13 OT/hl 1 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Annex A(1): Diseases of terrestrial animals Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Classical Swine Fever X X 0 X X Suidae and Tayassuidae Bluetongue All ruminants X X 0 X X VECTORS: Culicoides, etc. Epizootic haemorrhagic disease of All ruminants deer X X 0 X X VECTORS: Culicoides, etc. Swine Vesicular Disease X X 0 X X Suidae and Tayassuidae Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Poultry, captive birds and wild X X 0 X X birds Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5, H7) X X 0 X X Poultry and captive birds 16808/13 OT/hl 2 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Suidae and Tayassuidae VECTORS/RESERVOIRS African Swine Fever X X 0 X X SOFT TICKS – Genus Ornithodorus) Any domestic or wild animal of order Artylodactyla, suborders Ruminatia, Suina and Tylopoda; Foot and Mouth Disease X X 0 X X (Also, some measures: Rodentia and Proboscidae) Rinderpest X X 0 X X Ungulates Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) X X 0 X X Bovidae and Suidae All species of ungulates other than those of family Suidae Rift Valley Fever X X 0 X X VECTORS: mosquitos 16808/13 OT/hl 3 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance (Aedes, Culex) midges (Culicoides) Lumpy Skin Disease X X 0 X X Bovidae and Giraffidae Sheep and Goat Pox (Capripox) X X 0 X X Bovidae Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia Species of the genus Bos X 0 0 X X Equidae African Horse Sickness X X 0 X X VECTORS: Midges: Culicoides Equine encephalomyelitis (Incl. Equidae EEE, WEE and equine encephalomyelitis Japanese VECTORS: Mosquitoes, encephalomyelitis) X 0 0 X X birds, other reservoirs… Venezuelan equine X 0 0 X X Equidae 16808/13 OT/hl 4 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance encephalomyelitis) VECTORS: Mosquitoes, birds, other reservoirs… Equidae West Nile Virus 0 0 0 X X VECTORS: Mosquitoes Poultry, other captive birds, Newcastle Disease X X 0 X X including pigeons Vesicular stomatitis X X 0 X X Ungulates Teschen Disease Suidae X 0 0 X X Glanders 0 0 0 X X Equidae Equidae Dourine 0 0 0 X X Equine Infectious Anaemia 0 0 0 X X Equidae 16808/13 OT/hl 5 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Bovidae, Suidae, Ovidae, Rabies Capridae, Equidae, Carnivora 0 0 0 X X and Chiroptera Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Elephantidae, Equidae and Anthrax 0 0 0 X X Hippopotamidae Bovine tuberculosis Mammalia, in particular X Antilocapridae, Bovidae, (COMMENT: Mycobacterium (for apes and Camelidae, Cervidae, tuberculosis complex : bovis, 0 X felids) X X Giraffidae, and Tragulidae caprae) Antilocapridae, Bovidae, Brucella melitensis* Camelidae, Cervidae, 0 X 0 X X Giraffidae, Hippopotamidae and Tragulidae Antilocapridae, Bovidae, Brucella abortus* Camelidae, Cervidae, 0 X 0 X X Giraffidae, Hippopotamidae and Tragulidae 16808/13 OT/hl 6 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Antilocapridae, Bovidae, Brucella ovis* (contagious Camelidae, Cervidae, epididymitis) 0 X X Giraffidae, Hippopotamidae 0 0 and Tragulidae Cervidae, Leporidae, Ovibos moschatus, Suidae and Brucella suis* 0 0 X X X Tayassuidae Avian chlamydiosis 0 0 0 X X Psittaciformes Bovine animals (including Enzootic bovine leukosis 0 X 0 X X Bison bison and Bubalus bubalus) Small Hive Beetle (Aethina 0 0 0 X X Apis and Bombus tumida) Tropilaelaps mite (Tropilealaps 0 0 0 X X Apis spp.) American Foulbrood 0 0 0 X X Apis 16808/13 OT/hl 7 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Rodentia and non-human Monkey Pox 0 0 0 0 X primates Ebola 0 0 0 0 X Non-human primates (Apes) Aujesky's Disease 0 0 X X X Pigs Caseous Lymphadenitis (Corynebacteium 0 0 X X 0 Ovine and caprine pseudotuberculosis) Pulmonary Adenomatosis 0 0 X X 0 Ovine and caprine Paratuberculosis 0 0 X X 0 Ovine and caprine Maedi-visna 0 0 X X 0 Ovine and caprine Caprine Viral Ovine and caprine Arthritis/Encephalitis 0 0 X X 0 16808/13 OT/hl 8 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance 0 0 X X 0 Ovine and caprine Contagious Agalactia Border Disease 0 0 0 X 0 Ovine and caprine Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/ infectious pustular vulvovagi nitis 0 0 X X 0 Bovine animals Bovine [genital] campylobacteriosis – C. foetus 0 0 0 X 0 Bovine animals ssp. Venerealis Bovine Viral Bovine animals Diarrhoea/Mucosal Disease 0 0 0 X 0 Trichomonas foetus 0 0 0 X 0 Bovine animals Transmissible gastroenteritis 0 0 X X 0 Pigs European Foulbrood 0 0 X X 0 Bees 16808/13 OT/hl 9 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Echinococcus multilocularis 0 0 X X X Dogs Salmonella of animal health relevance Salmonella Pullorum, Salmonella Gallinarum and 0 0 X X 0 Poultry Salmonella arizonae Poultry Zoonotic Salmonellosis (other than above) X 0 X X X (Also, some measures: pigs) Poultry: Mycoplasma gallisepticum and M. gallisepticum – fowls and Mycoplasma meleagridis 0 0 X X X turkeys M. meleagridis – turkeys Tuberculosis (other than Bovine tuberculosis)** 0 0 X X X Apes, felids, ruminants Tularaemia 0 0 X X 0 Lagomorphs 16808/13 OT/hl 10 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Myxomatosis 0 0 X X 0 Lagomorphs Rabbit haemorrhagic disease 0 0 X X 0 Lagomorphs Viral Enteritis (Mink) 0 0 X X 0 Mink Aleutian Disease (Mink) 0 0 X X 0 Mink Varroosis 0 0 X X 0 Bees Acariasis 0 0 X X 0 Bees Crimean Congo 0 0 0 X 0 Ratites haemorrhagic fever TSEs (Reg 999/2001 and Dir 92/65) Bovine Spongiform Bovine animals, ovine and Encephalopathy X X 0 X X caprine animals Scrapie X X 0 X X Ovine or caprine animals 16808/13 OT/hl 11 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Chronic Wasting Disease X X 0 X X Cervidae TSEs not BV/OV/CP X X 0 0 X All animals Zoonoses (Dir 2003/99/EC and Reg 2075/2005 for Trichinellosis) Pigs, horses, wild boar and other Trichinellosis 0 0 X X X wild animals (susceptible to Tricinella infestation) Listeriosis 0 0 0 0 X Not specified Campylobacteriosis 0 0 0 0 X Not specified Verotoxigenic E.coli 0 0 0 0 X Not specified Leptospirosis 0 0 0 0 X*** Not specified Yersiniosis 0 0 0 0 X*** Not specified Vibriosis 0 0 0 0 X*** Not specified Toxoplasmosis 0 0 0 0 X*** Not specified Cryptosporidiosis 0 0 0 0 X*** Not specified Cysticercosis 0 0 0 0 X*** Not specified Anisakiasis 0 0 0 0 X*** Not specified 16808/13 OT/hl 12 ANNEX DG B 1 EN Subject to rules Article Article as set out in Article 8(1)(a) Article 8(1)(b) 8(1)(c) Article 8(1)(e) Immediate disease Compulsory Optional 8(1)(d) Notification, control & eradication “voluntary” Trade reporting & Listed species Diseases: eradication eradication surveillance Borreliosis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wild Or Bactrian Camel French: German: Wildkamel Spanish: Russian: Dikiy Verblud Chinese
    1 of 4 Proposal I / 7 PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF SPECIES ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: Inclusion of the Wild camel Camelus bactrianus in Appendix I of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals: B. PROPONENT: Mongolia C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxon 1.1. Classis: Mammalia 1.2. Ordo: Tylopoda 1.3. Familia: Camelidae 1.4. Genus: Camelus 1.5. Species: Camelus bactrianus Linnaeus, 1758 1.6. Common names: English: Wild or Bactrian camel French: German: Wildkamel Spanish: Russian: Dikiy verblud Chinese: 2. Biological data 2.1. Distribution Wild populations are restricted to 3 small, remnant populations in China and Mongolia:in the Taklamakan Desert, the deserts around Lop Nur, and the area in and around region A of Mongolia’s Great Gobi Strict Protected Area (Reading et al 2000). In addition, there is a small semi-captive herd of wild camels being maintained and bred outside of the Park. 2.2. Population Surveys over the past several decades have suggested a marked decline in wild bactrian camel numbers and reproductive success rates (Zhirnov and Ilyinsky 1986, Anonymous 1988, Tolgat and Schaller 1992, Tolgat 1995). Researchers suggest that fewer than 500 camels remain in Mongolia and that their population appears to be declining (Xiaoming and Schaller 1996). Globally, scientists have recently suggested that less than 900 individuals survive in small portions of Mongolia and China (Tolgat and Schaller 1992, Hare 1997, Tolgat 1995, Xiaoming and Schaller 1996). However, most of the population estimates from both China and Mongolia were made using methods which preclude rigorous population estimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thewissen Et Al. Reply Replying To: J
    NATURE | Vol 458 | 19 March 2009 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS ARISING Hippopotamus and whale phylogeny Arising from: J. G. M. Thewissen, L. N. Cooper, M. T. Clementz, S. Bajpai & B. N. Tiwari Nature 450, 1190–1194 (2007) Thewissen etal.1 describe new fossils from India that apparentlysupport fossils, Raoellidae or the raoellid Indohyus is more closely related to a phylogeny that places Cetacea (that is, whales, dolphins, porpoises) as Cetacea than is Hippopotamidae (Fig. 1). Hippopotamidae is the the sister group to the extinct family Raoellidae, and Hippopotamidae exclusive sister group to Cetacea plus Raoellidae in the analysis that as more closely related to pigs and peccaries (that is, Suina) than to down-weights homoplastic characters, althoughin the equallyweighted cetaceans. However, our reanalysis of a modified version of the data set analysis, another topology was equally parsimonious. In that topology, they used2 differs in retaining molecular characters and demonstrates Hippopotamidae moved one node out, being the sister group to an that Hippopotamidae is the closest extant family to Cetacea and that Andrewsarchus, Raoellidae and Cetacea clade. In neither analysis is raoellids are the closest extinct group, consistent with previous phylo- Hippopotamidae closer to the pigs and peccaries than to Cetacea, the genetic studies2,3. This topology supports the view that the aquatic result obtained by Thewissen et al.1. In all our analyses, pachyostosis adaptations in hippopotamids and cetaceans are inherited from their (thickening) of limb bones and bottom walking, which occur in hippo- common ancestor4. potamids9,10, are interpreted to have evolved before the pachyostosis of To conduct our analyses, we started with the same published matrix the auditory bulla, as seen in raoellids and cetaceans1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ungulate and Human Risk Perception in Shared Environments
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2020 Ungulate and human risk perception in shared environments Benjamin Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Recommended Citation Johnson, Benjamin, "Ungulate and human risk perception in shared environments" (2020). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 17960. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/17960 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ungulate and human risk perception in shared environments by Benjamin J. Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Robert Klaver, Co-major Professor Cassandra Nuñez, Co-major Professor Amy Toth Dara Wald The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this thesis. The Graduate College will ensure this thesis is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2020 Copyright © Benjamin J. Johnson, 2020. All rights
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Rewilding with Camelids
    Journal of Arid Environments 130 (2016) 54e61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Arid Environments journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaridenv Prospects for rewilding with camelids Meredith Root-Bernstein a, b, *, Jens-Christian Svenning a a Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark b Institute for Ecology and Biodiversity, Santiago, Chile article info abstract Article history: The wild camelids wild Bactrian camel (Camelus ferus), guanaco (Lama guanicoe), and vicuna~ (Vicugna Received 12 August 2015 vicugna) as well as their domestic relatives llama (Lama glama), alpaca (Vicugna pacos), dromedary Received in revised form (Camelus dromedarius) and domestic Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) may be good candidates for 20 November 2015 rewilding, either as proxy species for extinct camelids or other herbivores, or as reintroductions to their Accepted 23 March 2016 former ranges. Camels were among the first species recommended for Pleistocene rewilding. Camelids have been abundant and widely distributed since the mid-Cenozoic and were among the first species recommended for Pleistocene rewilding. They show a range of adaptations to dry and marginal habitats, keywords: Camelids and have been found in deserts, grasslands and savannas throughout paleohistory. Camelids have also Camel developed close relationships with pastoralist and farming cultures wherever they occur. We review the Guanaco evolutionary and paleoecological history of extinct and extant camelids, and then discuss their potential Llama ecological roles within rewilding projects for deserts, grasslands and savannas. The functional ecosystem Rewilding ecology of camelids has not been well researched, and we highlight functions that camelids are likely to Vicuna~ have, but which require further study.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships Among Cetartiodactyls Based on Insertions of Short and Long Interpersed Elements: Hippopotamuses Are the Closest Extant Relatives of Whales
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 10261–10266, August 1999 Evolution Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interpersed elements: Hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales MASATO NIKAIDO†,ALEJANDRO P. ROONEY‡, AND NORIHIRO OKADA†§ †Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Yokohama, Midori-ku, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan; and ‡Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, 328 Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802 Communicated by Masatoshi Nei, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, June 16, 1999 (received for review January 4, 1999) ABSTRACT Insertion analysis of short and long inter- The purpose of this study was to attempt to resolve the issues spersed elements is a powerful method for phylogenetic in- of artiodactyl and cetacean relationships by using a totally ference. In a previous study of short interspersed element different approach: analysis of SINE (short interspersed ele- data, it was found that cetaceans, hippopotamuses, and ru- ment; refs. 15 and 17–21) and LINE (long interspersed ele- minants form a monophyletic group. To further resolve the ment; refs. 22 and 23) insertion events. SINEs and LINEs are relationships among these taxa, we now have isolated and mobile genetic elements that have been amplified and inte- characterized 10 additional loci. A phylogenetic analysis of grated into a host genome by retroposition, which is the these data was able to resolve relationships among the major integration of a reverse-transcribed copy of an RNA (17, 21, cetartiodactyl groups, thereby shedding light on the origin of 24, 25), so SINEs and LINEs can be classified as retroposons.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial DNA Variation and Phylogeography of Old World Camels
    Open Access Anim Biosci Vol. 34, No. 4:525-532 April 2021 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0319 pISSN 2765-0189 eISSN 2765-0235 Mitochondrial DNA variation and phylogeography of Old World camels Liang Ming1,2 , Dalai Siren1,2, Li Yi1,2, Le Hai1, Jing He1, and Rimutu Ji1,2,* * Corresponding Author: Rimutu Ji Objective: Old World camels are a valuable genetic resource for many countries around Tel: +86-137-04785544, Fax: +86-0471-4309593, the world due to their adaptation to the desert environment. At present, Old World camels E-mail: [email protected] have encountered the challenge of unprecedented loss of genetic resources. Through our research, we would reveal the population structure and genetic variation in Old World 1 Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, camel populations, which provides a theoretical basis for understanding the germplasm College of Food Science and Engineering, resources and origin and evolution of different Old World camel populations. Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Methods: In the present study, we assessed mtDNA control region sequences of 182 indivi­ Hohhot 010018, China 2 Camel Research Institute of Inner Mongolia, duals from Old World camels to unravel genetic diversity, phylogeography, and demographic Alashan 737300, China dynamics. Results: Thirty­two haplotypes confirmed by 54 polymorphic sites were identified in the ORCID Liang Ming 156 sequences, which included 129 domestic and 27 wild Bactrian camels. Meanwhile, 14 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1051-9829 haplotypes were defined by 47 polymorphic sites from 26 sequences in the dromedaries. Dalai Siren The wild Bactrian camel population showed the lowest haplotype and nucleotide diversity, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-1473 while the dromedaries investigated had the highest.
    [Show full text]
  • AN AMERICAN FOSSIL GIRAFFE Giraffa Nebrascensis, Sp. Nov
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska State Museum 1925 AN AMERICAN FOSSIL GIRAFFE irG affa nebrascensis, sp. nov. W. D. Matthew E. H. Barbour Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons, Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, Paleontology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. BULLETIN 4 VOLUME 1 APRIL 1925 THE NEBRASKA STATE MUSEUM ERWIN H. BARBOUR, Director AN AMERICAN FOSSIL GIRAFFE Giraffa nebrascensis, sp. nov. By W. D. MATTHEW E. H. BARBOUR A fragment of the lower jaw of a large fossil mammal with two well-worn teeth was dug up in June 1918, at a depth of 20 feet, while digging a cess pool at Bradshaw, York County, Nebraska. This unique specimen, accessioned 7-7-18, was brought to the Nebraska State Museum by A. Archie Dorsey, and was donated by C. B. Palmet, both of Bradshaw. It undoubtedly occurred in loess, which is thickly as well. as extensively de­ veloped in this region. It is a ruminant jaw, the teeth preserved being P4 and m 1 • The characteristic pattern of the premolar excludes refer­ ence to the Bovidae, and leaves the choice between the Gi­ raffidae, Pa~aeomerycidae, and certain large Cervidae.
    [Show full text]
  • 246 Appendix 40 FMD and Camelids
    Appendix 40 FMD and camelids: International relevance of current research U. Wernery Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 597, Dubai, U.A.E. Key words: Tylopoda, camelids, FMD Abstract Camelids regurgitate and re-chew their food and thus technically ruminate. In strict taxonomic terms, however, they are not recognized as belonging to the suborder Ruminantia. They belong to the suborder Tylopoda. Numerous differences in anatomy and physiology justify a separate classification of tylopods from ruminants. Many reports show that New World Camelids (NWC) and Old World Camelids (OWC) possess a low susceptibility to foot and mouth disease (FMD), and do not appear to be long-term carriers of the foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV). Recent preliminary results from Dubai have shown that two dromedaries infected subepidermolingually with FMD serotype 0 did not develop any clinical signs and failed to develop any lesions at the inoculation site. Infectious FMDV or FMDV RNA were not isolated and the two dromedaries failed to seroconvert. It would, therefore, appear appropriate for OIE to refine the definition of NWC and OWC by clearly stating that these animal species are not members of the suborder Ruminantia. Furthermore, these recent results suggest that dromedaries (and most probably all camelid species), which are listed in the OIE Code chapter as being susceptible to FMD similar to cattle, sheep, goats and pigs, are much less susceptible or non-susceptible to FMD. Therefore, the importance of FMD in camelids should be re- assessed. The Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (CVRL) in Dubai, U.A.E., offers to become a reference laboratory for OWC.
    [Show full text]
  • Digestive Strategies in Ruminants and Nonruminants S.E. Van Wieren
    DIGESTIVE STRATEGIES IN RUMINANTS AND NONRUMINANTS S.E. VANWIERE N 0000 0714 3726 Promotoren: Dr. ir. S. Tamminga, buitengewoon hoogleraar op het vakgebied van de veevoeding in het bijzonder de voeding van herkauwers Dr. H.H.T. Prins, hoogleraar in het natuurbeheer in de tropen en oecologie van vertebraten WMoPûi , ZI 9 S.E. van Wieren DIGESTIVE STRATEGIES IN RUMINANTS AND NONRUMINANTS Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van de Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, dr. C.M. Karssen, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 3 december 1996 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula. aiqo?<? T CIP-DATA KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG Van Wieren, S.E. Digestive strategies in ruminants and nonruminants / S.E. van Wieren. - Thesis Landbouw Universiteit Wageningen. - With réf. - With summary in Dutch. ISBN 90-5485-611-4 Subject headings: digestion / ruminants /nonruminants / feeding ecology cr.-::i n; . •Y.:r Cover and illustrations: Esther van Nie & Marjolein Wiersma STELLINGEN I De veelvuldig aangehangen gedachte dat paarden, wat betreft de dagelijkse opname van metaboliseerbare energie uit laagwaardig voedsel, superieur zijn aan runderen, wordt niet door alle onderzoek ondersteund en blijkt ook niet altijd uit praktijkervaringen. P. Duncan et al. (1990). Oecologia 84:411-418. R. Meydam. Evaluatie begrazing Meyendel. 1996. II Wilde zwijnen die op een dieet van uitsluitend mast leven, krijgen onherroepelijk eiwitgebrek. III Het concept van duurzame ontwikkeling leidt in de praktijk niet zozeer tot beperkingen aan de groei, maar meer tot de groei van de beperkingen. B. Willers. (1994). Conservation Biology (8):1146-1148 . IV De typisch nederlandse gedachte dat de mens verrijkend heeft gewerkt op de natuur, is een gevaarlijke misvatting.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoparasites of Exotic Ungulates from the Giraffidae and Camelidae Families Kept Ex Situ
    Annals of Parasitology 2016, 62(1), 67–70 Copyright© 2016 Polish Parasitological Society doi: 10.17420/ap6201.34 Original papers Endoparasites of exotic ungulates from the Giraffidae and Camelidae families kept ex situ Paweł Nosal1, Jerzy Kowal1, Sławomir Kornaś1, Anna Wyrobisz1, Józef Skotnicki2, Marta Basiaga1, Natalia E. Plucińska1 1Institute of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland 2Fundacja Miejski Park i Ogród Zoologiczny w Krakowie, Kasy Oszczędności Miasta Krakowa 14, 30-232 Kraków, Poland Corresponding Author: Paweł Nosal; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Giraffes and camels are popular attractions at zoological gardens. In order to present the diversity of parasites infecting exotic ungulates from zoos, faecal samples from three giraffes and six camels from both the Silesian Zoological Garden in Chorzów, and Kraków Zoological Garden, were examined. The research was carried out over a ten-month period in 2013 and 2014. In total, 100 faecal samples from 18 animals were analysed with the use of the McMaster method. Moreover, coccidian oocysts were incubated to investigate their development and larvoscopic examination was conducted to detect the presence of nematode species. Giraffes were infected with coccidia from the genus Eimeria, and gastrointestinal nematodes from the Strongylida order, and Trichuris and Aonhotheca genera. One male giraffe was uninfected. The level of infection in giraffes was low when compared to camels kept in both of the zoos. Limited contact with other animal species contributed greatly to the lower level of infection in camels from Kraków Zoo than those from Chorzów, which were kept in the same enclosure as alpacas and Shetland ponies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intraruminal Papillation Gradient in Wild Ruminants of Different Feeding Types: Implications for Rumen Physiology
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 270:929–942 (2009) The Intraruminal Papillation Gradient in Wild Ruminants of Different Feeding Types: Implications for Rumen Physiology Marcus Clauss,1* Reinhold R. Hofmann,2 Jo¨ rns Fickel,2 W. Ju¨ rgen Streich,2 and Ju¨ rgen Hummel3 1Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 2Research Group for Evolutionary Genetics, Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Berlin, Germany 3Department of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany ABSTRACT Browsing and grazing ruminants are species between seasons (Hofmann, 1973; Langer, thought to differ in the degree their rumen contents are 1974; Ko¨nig et al., 1976; Hofmann, 1982; Hofmann stratified—which may be due to different characteristics and Schnorr, 1982; Hofmann, 1984, 1985; Smolle- of their respective forages, to particular adaptations of Wieszniewski, 1987; Hofmann et al., 1988a; Hofmann the animals, or both. However, this stratification is diffi- and Nygren, 1992; Josefsen et al., 1996; Forsyth and cult to measure in live animals. The papillation of the rumen has been suggested as an anatomical proxy for Fraser, 1999; Mathiesen et al., 2000; Kamler, 2001), stratification—with even papillation indicating homoge- or between free-ranging and captive individuals (Hof- nous contents, and uneven papillation (with few and mann and Matern, 1988; Marholdt, 1991; Hofmann small dorsal and ventral papillae, and prominent papil- and Nygren, 1992; Lentle et al., 1996). lae in the atrium ruminis) stratified contents. Using the Differences in the degree of papillation among surface enlargement factor (SEF, indicating how basal different rumen regions in the same animal have mucosa surface is increased by papillae) of over 55 rumi- been recognized for a long time in cattle, where nant species, we demonstrate that differences between especially the dorsal rumen wall completely lacks the SEFdorsal or SEFventral and the SEFatrium are signifi- papillae.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Camel Origin, History, Raising, Characteristics, and Wool, Hair and Skin, a Review
    International Journal of Research and Innovations in Earth Science Volume 2, Issue 6, ISSN (Online) : 2394-1375 Introduction to Camel Origin, History, Raising, Characteristics, and Wool, Hair and Skin, A Review Barat Ali Zarei Yam Morteza Khomeiri Ph.D. Student of Food Science and Technology, The Associate Professor of Food Science and Technology Gorgan University of Agriculture Sciences and Natural in agriculture sciences and natural resources university Resources, Gorgan, 49138-15739, Iran of Gorgan, Iran Email: [email protected], Tell: 989378212956 Abstract – In this review, we discussed about camel origin, Table 1: Genealogy of the dromedary camel history, population, characteristics, raising and wool, hair Order Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates) and skin from camel. The camelides belong to order Suborder Tylopoda (pad-footed animals) Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates) and sub-order Tylopoda. Family Camelidae The family Camelidae is divided into 3 genera, The old world camels (genus Camelus, one-humped camel, Camelus Subfamily Camelinae dromedarius and The Bactrian or two-humped camel, Genus Camelus Camelus bactrianus) and the new world camels (genus Lama Species Camelus dromedaries with the species L. glama, L. guanicoe, L. pacos and genus Vicugna with the species V. vicugna). The Camelini had (genus Lama with the species L. glama, L. guanicoe, L. reached Eurasia via the Bering Isthmus about 5-3 million pacos and genus Vicugna with the species V. vicugna) years ago, whereas Lamini dispersed to South America via (Wilson and Reeder, 2005) (Fig 1). The new-world Panam’s Isthmus about 3 million years ago. Scientists have been reconstructed an evolutionary life tree of the camelidae Camelidae are smaller versions of the camels and live in based on its genome sequences analysis.
    [Show full text]