DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecomap Sections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecomap Sections U.S. Forest Service 'EcoMap Sections' Relaitve to Eastern Region (R9) Forests and States Displayed Here Are Only Those EcoMap Sections That Intersect Eastern Region NFS Administrative Units (Labeled with SECTION, SECTION_NAME) 212M Northern Minnesota and Ontario Superior M211A 212L White Mountains Northern Superior Uplands ME Chippewa 212Y Southwest Lake Superior Clay Plain Canada 212N 212R Northern Minnesota Drift and Lake Plains White Mountain 212S Eastern Upper Peninsula Ottawa Northern Upper Peninsula 212J Hiawatha Southern Superior Uplands 211E St. Lawrence and Champlain Valley 212K VT Western Superior Uplands Chequamegon-Nicolet MI M211B New England Piedmont 212X Northern Highlands Green Mountain and Finger Lakes NH 212H MN Northern Lower Peninsula M211C 212T Green-Taconic-Berkshire Mountains Northern Green Bay Lobe NY 212Q North Central Wisconsin Uplands Huron-Manistee 212Z Green Bay - Manitowac Upland 221A MA Lower New England 222I Erie and Ontario Lake Plain Green Mountain and Finger Lakes RI WI MI 211F CT Northern Glaciated Allegheny Plateau Eastern Region RO 211G 222J Northern Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau South Central Great Lakes Allegheny IA PA NJ M221A Northern Ridge and Valley Midewin M221B Allegheny Mountains 221E 251D OH 251C Southern Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau Central Till Plains and Grand Prairies Central Dissected Till Plains MD IN DE IL Wayne Monongahela Hoosier 223G 223F WV Central Till Plains-Oak Hickory Interior Low Plateau-Bluegrass MO M221C 223B Northern Cumberland Mountains Interior Low Plateau-Transition Hills 223D Interior Low Plateau-Shawnee Hills Shawnee 223A 50 25 0 50 100 150 200 250 Ozark Highlands Mark Twain Miles EcoMap "Sections" Intersecting R9 NFS Units 221E, Southern Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau SECTION, SECTION_NAME 222I, Erie and Ontario Lake Plain 211E, St. Lawrence and Champlain Valley 222J, South Central Great Lakes 211F, Northern Glaciated Allegheny Plateau 223A, Ozark Highlands 231H 211G, Northern Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau 223B, Interior Low Plateau-Transition Hills Coastal Plains-Loess 212H, Northern Lower Peninsula 223D, Interior Low Plateau-Shawnee Hills 212J, Southern Superior Uplands 223F, Interior Low Plateau-Bluegrass 212K, Western Superior Uplands 223G, Central Till Plains-Oak Hickory 212L, Northern Superior Uplands 231H, Coastal Plains-Loess 234D White and Black River Alluvial Plains 212M, Northern Minnesota and Ontario 234D, White and Black River Alluvial Plains 212N, Northern Minnesota Drift and Lake Plains 251C, Central Dissected Till Plains 212Q, North Central Wisconsin Uplands 251D, Central Till Plains and Grand Prairies 212R, Eastern Upper Peninsula M211A, White Mountains Thematic Content: USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region RO, J.Schultz 212S, Northern Upper Peninsula M211B, New England Piedmont Botany, Non-native Invasive Species, and Special Forest Products Program Leader 212T, Northern Green Bay Lobe M211C, Green-Taconic-Berkshire Mountains Data Sources: 212X, Northern Highlands M221A, Northern Ridge and Valley Ecomap: USDA Forest Service ECOMAP Team, published 2007, contact D.Cleland, Rhinelander, WI (http://svinetfc4.fs.fed.us/clearinghouse/other_resources/ecosubregions.html). 212Y, Southwest Lake Superior Clay Plain M221B, Allegheny Mountains Eastern Region States & NFS Units: USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region RO, Information Management Staff 212Z, Green Bay - Manitowac Upland M221C, Northern Cumberland Mountains Analysis and Cartography, USFS Region 9 RO, M.Martischang, GIS Coordinator, 3/31/2011 221A, Lower New England ArcGIS 10.0, Region9_EcoMapSections.mxd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Appalachian Forest Planning Team Considered Information from the Nature Conservancy’S Population Viability Assessment Workshop (Morris Et Al
    Central Appalachian Forest Ecoregional Plan February 2001 The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Central Appalachian Forest Ecoregional Plan The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy’s Central Appalachian Forest ecoregion encompasses the Blue Ridge Mountains, the Great Valley, the Ridge and Valley, and the Allegheny Mountains of Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. Valleys are mostly settled with farms and, more recently, urban and suburban development, but the vast majority of the hills and mountains of this ecoregion are forested. Lying so close to the major East Coast metropolitan areas of Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, DC, the region represents a tremendous natural resource for both the local people and these urbanites. The high mountains, the lack of past glacial coverage, and the environmental diversity of this ecoregion have combined to make this area one of the most ecologically diverse regions of the eastern United States. This ecoregional plan has identified plants, animals, natural communities, and ecological systems that represent the most urgent conservation priorities for The Nature Conservancy and its partners. Using an exceptional Natural Heritage database and sound science, this plan recommends protection of 467 sites. Within this set of sites, The Nature Conservancy has selected 122 sites for immediate conservation action. The approximate area covered by the portfolio is 3,011,000 acres. Of this area, 2,530,000 acres occurs within large, roadless forest areas. Therefore, smaller sites cover an additional 481,000 acres. The Federal government manages approximately 46% of roadless forest area acreage and various state governments an additional 18%. The majority of the remaining area of roadless forest areas is privately owned.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee
    The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 . II • r ,j • • ~1 =1 i1 .. ·~ II .I '1 .ill ~ I ... ... II 'II .fi :. I !~ ...1 . ~ !,~ .,~ 'I ~ J ·-=· ..I ·~ tJ 1;1 .. II "'"l ,,'\. d • .... ·~ I 3: ... • J ·~ •• I -' -\1 - I =,. The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee By WILLIAM F. OUTERBRIDGE A highly dissected plateau with narrow valleys, steep slopes, narrow crested ridges, and landslides developed on flat-lying Pennsylvanian shales and subgraywacke sandstone during the past 1.5 million years U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Outerbridge, William F. The Logan Plateau, a young physiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1620) Bibliography: p. 18. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1620 1. Geomorphology-Logan Plateau. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1620 557.3 s [551.4'34'0975] 84-600132 [GB566.L6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Methods of study 3 Geomorphology 4 Stratigraphy 9 Structure 11 Surficial deposits 11 Distribution of residuum 11 Depth of weathering 11 Soils 11 Landslides 11 Derivative maps of the Logan Plateau and surrounding area 12 History of drainage development since late Tertiary time 13 Summary and conclusions 17 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northeast Region
    The Northeast Region The Northeast Region Land and Water of the Northeast The region between the coast of the Atlantic Ocean and the Great Lakes is called the Northeast region. The Northeast region includes eleven states. The Northeast region has broad valleys, rolling hills, and low mountains. The Appalachian Mountains stretch from Maine in the Northeast region down to Alabama in the Southeast region. Several different mountain ranges make up the This map shows the eleven states of the Northeast Appalachian Mountains, including the region. Allegheny Mountains, the Pocono Mountains, the Adirondack Mountains, and the Catskills. The Appalachian Mountains are one of the oldest mountain ranges in the world. Although they used to be very tall, they are much smaller now. Over time, water, wind, and ice have caused the rock of the mountains to slowly break down. Now the peaks of the Appalachian Mountains are smooth and rounded. The longest hiking trail in the world is the Appalachian Trail. It goes from Maine to Georgia, along the spine of the mountain range, through more than 2,000 miles of valleys, hills, and rivers. The Appalachian Trail is a very popular place to hike. There are many people who have hiked the entire trail! The tops of the Appalachian Mountains have been worn down over many millions of years. ★ created by Jill S. Russ ★ mrsruss.com ★ Page 1 Mount Washington in New Hampshire is part of the Appalachian Mountain range. At 6,288 feet tall, Mount Washington is the highest peak in the Northeast. Mount Washington has some of the world's most severe weather.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean
    HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean The High Allegheny Plan is a first iteration, a scientific assessment of the ecoregion. As part of the planning process, other aspects of the plan will be developed in future iterations, along with updates to the ecological assessment itself. These include fuller evaluations of threats to the ecoregion, constraints on conservation activities, and implementation strategies. CSS is now developing a standard template for ecoregional plans, which we have applied to the HAL first iteration draft report, distributed in 2002. Some of the HAL results have been edited or updated for this version. Click on the navigation pane to browse the report sections. What is the purpose of the report template? The purpose of creating a standard template for ecoregional plans in the Northeast is twofold: — to compile concise descriptions of methodologies developed and used for ecoregional assessment in the Northeast. These descriptions are meant to meet the needs of planning team members who need authoritative text to include in future plan documents, of science staff who need to respond to questions of methodology, and of program and state directors looking for material for general audience publications. — to create a modular resource whose pieces can be selected, incorporated in various formats, linked to in other documents, and updated easily. How does the template work? Methods are separated from results in this format, and the bulk of our work has gone into the standard methods sections. We have tried to make each methods section stand alone. Every section includes its own citation on the first page.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Pittsburgh's Economic Destiny Set in 1815?
    Was Pittsburgh’s Economic Destiny Set in 1815? EDWARD K. MULLER first read The Urban Frontier as a graduate student in historical geog- Iraphy many years ago. I naturally focused on the geographical impli- cations of Richard C. Wade’s thesis that towns emerged on the Ohio Valley frontier along with the earliest pioneers, “held the West for the approaching population,” and accelerated its transformation to a settled region.1 This critical insight into the settlement process anchored my dissertation.2 His view that “towns were the spearheads” and not the cul- mination of the settlement process, overturned the conventional Tu rnerian interpretation of frontier urbanization and spurred the work of many subsequent scholars.3 At the time of my initial reading, I paid little attention to Wade’s comparative methodology and comprehensive topical coverage. Returning to The Urban Frontier often in the ensuing years, I gained an __________________________ Edward K. Muller is Professor of History at the University of Pittsburgh. Among his recent pub- lications is (with John F. Bauman) Before Renaissance: Planning in Pittsburgh, 1889-1943 (2006). 1Richard C. Wade, The Urban Frontier: The Rise of Western Cities, 1790-1830 (Cambridge, Mass., 1959), 342. 2Edward K. Muller, “The Development of Urban Settlement in a Newly Settled Region: The Middle Ohio Valley, 1800-1860,” (PhD diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1972); Muller, “Selective Urban Growth in the Middle Ohio Valley, 1800-1860,” Geographical Review, 66 (April 1976), 178-99; Muller, “Regional Urbanization and the Selective Growth of Towns in North American Regions,” Journal of Historical Geography, 3 (January 1977), 21-39.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny Mountain Magic Walk Route
    Allegheny Mountain Magic Walk Route 1 Gallitzin Tunnels Park & Museum 2 Gallitzin Tunnels 3 The Former Railroad Town of Bennington Overlook P Parking Start/Stop . Distance 1.4 Miles pawalkworks.com Allegheny Mountain Magic Walk Route Gallitzin Tunnels Park & Museum 1 The Gallitzin Tunnels Park & Museum features a souvenir shop, historical artifacts, and a display of photographs depicting the community’s industrial, social, and religious heritage as well as a restored 1942 Pennsylvania caboose whose interior is visible to visitors. Immediately adjacent to the museum is a 24 seat theater offering scheduled videos and programs dealing with railroad heritage and other current topics. The Museum also houses the borough office, a police station, a library and an archival room. Gallitzin Tunnels 2 The Gallitzin Tunnels formed the Pennsylvania Railroad’s passage through the Allegheny Mountains in western Pennsylvania. Ownership has since passed from the Pennsylvania Railroad to the Norfolk Southern Railway with the tunnels currently being used by Norfolk Southern freight trains and Amtrak passenger trains. The first of three tunnels, the “Allegheny Tunnel,” originally named “Summit Tunnel,” was built between 1851 and 1854. The Allegheny Tunnel is 3,612 feet long and is located at an elevation of 2,167 feet above mean sea level. The second tunnel, the southernmost of the bores, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from 1852 to 1855 as part of the New Portage Railroad. Construction on the third tunnel, the “Gallitzin Tunnel,” located immediately to the north of the Allegheny Tunnel, began in 1902 and was completed in 1904. The Former Railroad Town of Bennington Overlook 3 Beginning as a Pennsylvania Railroad company town, Bennington was a railroad town during the mid1800’s until the early 1900’s when it was abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORTER DISPATCH Summer 2011 the Journal of Old Allegheny History and Lore Number 54
    The Allegheny City Society REPORTER DISPATCH Summer 2011 The Journal of Old Allegheny History and Lore Number 54 Tour a Great Success Meadville Civil War tour visits sites and archives by Ruth McCartan Rain, Rain and more Rain was the order of the day for the April 16 Meadville tour. But a few rain drops, let alone an all- day rain, would not dampen the spirits of these history bluffs in search of stories from the Civil War. The Meadville Unitarian Church was the first stop. It was built in 1836 by George Cullum, a West point engineer who helped build Fort Sumter, and financed by Harm Jan Huidekoper, a Dutch land agent and Calvinist turned Uni- tarian. The church building has not changed much since the founding families dedicated it. After a tour of the sanctuary the group visited with the members of the Meadville Civil War Roundtable in their library at the Historical Society. Anne Stewart told of Capt. David Dickerson of Co. K, 150th Regiment of Pennsylvania Volunteers, this Meadville unit was detailed to be President Abraham Lincoln guards at the Summer Cottage just outside of Washington D.C. A map with an Allegheny City connection was brought out of storage for viewing. Alexander Hays, who worked for the Allegheny City engineering department before the Civil War, created a large map of the Meadville area while a student of Allegheny Col- lege. Hays, was to go on to become a general and was killed The grave site of John Brown’s first wife and their infant child in the cemetery in New Richmond was a stop on the tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains of Alleghenies: a Comprehensive Look at the Non Educational Usage of the Allegheny Brand
    MOUNTAINS OF ALLEGHENIES: A COMPREHENSIVE LOOK AT THE NON EDUCATIONAL USAGE OF THE ALLEGHENY BRAND from research conducted for the dissertation SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST? THE REBRANDING OF WEST VIRGINIA HIGHER EDUCATION this section was eliminated from the final version of Chapter 9 James Martin Owston, EdD Keywords: Higher education, rebranding, brand identity, college-to-university Copyright 2007 by James Martin Owston MOUNTAINS OF ALLEGHENIES Stretching from New York to North Carolina, the name Allegheny and its variant spellings pepper the United States map. For example, Pennsylvania is home to Allegheny County. Maryland and New York have counties named Allegany. Farther south, Virginia and North Carolina each sport an Alleghany County. As with the varied spelling, the exact origin and the original meaning of “Allegheny” were unknown. Although a Native American derivation is most certain, the original word identified as “Oolikhanna” has been variously credited to the Delaware, Algonquin, Cherokee, Seneca, and Proto- Iroquoian languages and dialects. Of its definition, some have suggested the following: “best river,” “fine river,” “cold river,” “swift river,” “beautiful river,” “endless or boundless mountains,” “the great warpath,” and simply a name derived from the homeland of the Allegwi (a supposed northern branch of the Cherokee tribe). Whatever the source, the name was adopted first by the French and later by the English who applied it to the mountains and the river that now bear the name (Errett, 1885; “Maryland Local Governments,” 2002; Mooney, 1975; Stephens, 1921; Taylor, 1898). Because of its geographical connection, the Allegheny appellation is extremely well known and its usage is widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Boone County
    The Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) FY 2014-2018 Region III Planning and Development Council Serving Boone, Clay, Kanawha and Putnam Counties 315 D Street South Charleston, WV 25303 (304) 744-4258 INDEX Page Introduction ………………………………………….. 3 County Summaries……………………………………………. 7 Boone…………………………. 8 Clay…………………………… 21 Kanawha……………………. 31 Putnam……………………… 49 SWOC Analysis……………………………………………….. 60 Strengths………………… 64 Weaknesses………………. 71 Opportunities…………… 73 Challenges………………… 74 Goals, Objectives & Strategies………………………….. 76 Performance Measures & Outcomes………………….. 80 Regional Economic Analysis……………………………… 82 Regional and County Project Lists…………………….. 90 RIC Progress Report……………………………………… 94 Appendix……………………………………………………… 100 2 INTRODUCTION This report constitutes the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for WV Region 3, which consists of Boone, Clay, Kanawha and Putnam Counties. It is developed by the Regional Intergovernmental Council (RIC) with the support of US EDA and in collaboration with the CEDS committee and local economic development agencies. The purpose of the CEDS is to provide an overview and analysis of current economic conditions and a future vision for the region. This vision is expressed as goals, objectives and strategies. Specific projects are also proposed. Region 3 has not escaped the impact of the recent economic downturn and is affected by the changing national and global economy. Like much of WV, the area is blessed with rich natural resources and the advantages, such as proximity to eastern markets. The primary challenge for the future is to use these advantages to develop and sustain a robust economy. The interstate highway system that serves Region III includes I-64, I-77 and I- 79. This interstate system has largely been responsible for Region III’s growth as a major distribution center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Abandoned Underground
    ABSTRACTS 1 DAY 1 Opening Session Chair: Kirk Beach Synthesis Study of State DOTs and the UK geotechnical Data Systems Robert C. Bachus, Kirk Beach, and Thomas Lefchik [email protected] There is little doubt that a functioning standardized distributed geotechnical database system would benefit the geotechnical community. There are any numbers of examples that can be cited to provide emphasis to this point, as many of the participants at this conference are well-aware. One example, and the one that will be focused in this presentation, includes the geotechnical engineers and geologists from the various state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) across the country. These agencies have historically collected (and continue to collect) a tremendous amount of geotechnical and geologic information during the execution of highway construction projects. Unfortunately, there are currently no standardized guidelines for collecting, storing, or managing these data. While many of the DOTs have developed some form of a geotechnical management system that works for their respective state, very few have developed systems that treat geotechnical information as “data”. Historically, many DOTs have looked to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for guidance related to technical issues, particularly the issues that are common to and affect virtually all agencies, regardless of the geologic or geographic setting. The issue of geotechnical data management is one of these areas where FHWA involvement and guidance would be beneficial to several agencies. Although there has not necessarily been a formal “request for guidance” to the FHWA from all of the DOTs, a few of the states have either solicited FHWA assistance or taken the initiative to develop state- specific data management systems.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2007
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Air Pollution Control Ohio’s PM 2.5 Recommended Designations Prepared by: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Air Pollution Control December 2007 [This page intentionally left blank] Page 2 of 177 Acknowledgement The Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control would like to express appreciation for the extensive efforts, guidance and expertise provided by the Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research staff, especially Ed Simmons. The level of detailed county-specific information provided in this document would not have been possible without Mr. Simmons efforts and timely assistance. Appreciation is also extended to Greg Stella at Alpinegeophysics, Inc. and to Mark Janssen at Midwest RPO for their assistance with the emissions data included in this submittal. Page 3 of 177 [This page intentionally left blank] Page 4 of 177 List of Appendices A. Air Quality System (AQS) data sheets B. Ohio EPA, DAPC PM2.5 summary sheets C. SLAMS 2006 PM2.5 certification D. Speciation data E. Meteorology data, wind roses F. Physiographic, elevation and land cover maps G. Jurisdiction boundary maps H. County profiles and statewide informational maps I. Public notice, public hearing, and response to comments documentation Page 5 of 177 Current PM2.5 Ohio EPA Nonattainment Recommended Designation Area Designation Nonattainment Counties Counties (1) Canton-Massillon, OH Stark Stark Butler Butler Clermont Clermont (2) Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Hamilton Hamilton Warren
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I-68/I-70: a WINDOW to the APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J
    I-68/I-70: A WINDOW TO THE APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J. Renton Dept. of Geology & Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Introduction The Appalachian Mountains are probably the most studied mountains on Earth. Many of our modern ideas as to the origin of major mountain systems evolved from early investigations of the Appalachian region. The Appalachians offer a unique opportunity to experience the various components of an entire mountain system within a relatively short distance and period of time. Compared to the extensive areas occupied by other mountain systems such as the Rockies and the Alps, the Appalachians are relatively narrow and can be easily crossed within a few hours driving time. Following I-68 and I-70 between Morgantown, WV, and Frederick, Maryland, for example, one can visit all of the major structural components within the Appalachians within a distance of about 160 miles. Before I continue, I would like to clarify references to the Allegheny and Appalachian mountains. The Allegheny Mountains were created about 250 million years ago when continents collided during the Alleghenian Orogeny to form the super-continent of Pangea (Figure 1). As the continents collided, a range of mountains were created in much the same fashion that the Himalaya Mountains are now being formed by the collision of India and Asia. About 50 million years after its Figure 1 1 creation, Pangea began to break up with the break occurring parallel to the axis of the original mountains. As the pieces that were to become our present continents moved away from each other, the Indian, Atlantic, and Arctic oceans were created (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]