DOCSLIB.ORG

Yellow Creek Watershed Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yellow Creek Watershed Action Plan YELLOW CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Eastgate Regional Council of Governments 100 E. Federal Street, Suite1000 Youngstown, Ohio 44503 www.eastgatecog.org April 14, 2015 This plan was financed in part or totally through a grant from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) with the following funds: American Recovery and Reinvestment Funds (ARRA) contract agreement #ERCOGSTM9, Federal Section 604(b) Clean Water Act funds, and State of Ohio Biennium funds. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, or conclusions or recommendations contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio EPA and U.S. EPA. EASTGATE REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Serving Northeast Ohio since 1973 The Eastgate Regional Council of Governments is a multipurpose Regional Council of Governments for Ashtabula, Mahoning and Trumbull Counties, as established by Section 167.01 of the Ohio Revised Code. Eastgate is the agency designated or recognized to perform the following functions: • Serve as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in Mahoning and Trumbull Counties, with responsibility for the comprehensive, coordinated and continuous planning for highways, public transit and other transportation modes as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) legislation. • Perform continuous water quality planning functions in cooperation with Ohio and U.S. EPA. • Provide planning to meet air quality requirements under MAP-21 and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. • Administration of the Economic Development District Program. • Administration of the Local Development District of the Appalachian Regional Commission. • Administration of the State Capital Improvement Program for the District 6 Public Works Integrating Committee. • Administer the area clearinghouse function, which includes providing local government with the opportunity to review a wide variety of local or state applications for federal funds. • Administration of the regional Rideshare Program for Ashtabula, Mahoning and Trumbull Counties. • Conduct demographic, economic and land use research. • At General Policy Board direction, provide planning assistance to local governments that comprise the Eastgate planning area. • Administration of the Clean Ohio Conservation & Revitalization Funds. GENERAL POLICY BOARD (2014) Chairman - Commissioner Dan Claypool, Ashtabula County 1st Vice Chairman – Joseph Warino, City of Canfield 2nd Vice Chairman – Mark Hess, City of Niles Brian Anderson, Ashtabula County Mayor Bernie Kosar, Sr., City of Canfield Mayor Eric Augustein, Village of Beloit Paul Makosky, City of Warren Jerry Brockway, Ashtabula County Mayor John McNally, City of Youngstown Nancy Brundage, Citizens Advisory Board Mayor James Melfi, City of Girard Peggy Carlo, Ashtabula County Commissioner William Miller, Director, Trumbull County Planning Comm. Mayor Thomas Christlieb, Village of West Farmington Mayor Curt Moll, City of Cortland Mayor John Darko, City of Hubbard Joe Moroski, Ashtabula County Commissioner David Ditzler, Mahoning County Commissioner Mayor J. Michael Pinkerton, Village of Sebring James Ferraro, Director, Western Reserve Transit Daniel Polivka, Trumbull County Commissioner Authority Kurt Princic, OEPA NE District Chief Mayor Douglas Franklin, City of Warren Carol Rimedio-Righetti, Mahoning County Commissioner Frank Fuda, Trumbull County Commissioner Mayor Timothy Sicafuse, Village of Poland Pat Ginnetti, Mahoning County Engineer Randy Smith, Trumbull County Engineer Fred Hanley, Hubbard Township Mayor Dave Spencer, Village of Craig Beach Paul E. Heltzel, Trumbull County Commissioner Mayor Terry Stocker, City of Struthers Mayor Arno Hill, Village of Lordstown Anthony Traficanti, Mahoning County Commissioner Glenn Holmes, Mayor, Village of McDonald Tony Urankar, District Deputy Director, ODOT District 4 Mayor Ralph Infante, Jr., City of Niles Mayor William Van Such, City of Campbell Mayor James Iudiciani, Village of Lowellville Mayor Lyle A. Waddell, City of Newton Falls Mayor William Jones, Village of Washingtonville Heflin Willingham, Citizens Advisory Board Mayor Harry Kale, Village of New Middletown Representative TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (2014) CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD (2014) Chairman-Rob Donham , Vice Chairman- Gary Shaffer, Chairman- Gerald Hurayt, Vice Chairman- James J. Pirko TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................................................... viii I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Defining the Yellow Creek Watershed ................................................................................................... 1 i. Yellow Creek Watershed: Overview .................................................................................................. 1 ii. Special Districts .................................................................................................................................... 5 iii. Special Designations ........................................................................................................................... 8 iv. Phase II Stormwater Communities ..................................................................................................... 8 B. Demographics .......................................................................................................................................... 9 i. Population and Age ............................................................................................................................ 9 ii. Education Levels .................................................................................................................................. 9 iii. Housing ............................................................................................................................................... 11 iv. Population Trends ............................................................................................................................... 11 v. Education Trends ................................................................................................................................ 11 vi. Income Levels, Locations of Growth ............................................................................................... 14 vii. Economic Patterns ............................................................................................................................. 15 viii. Other Factors ...................................................................................................................................... 15 C. Geographic Locators ............................................................................................................................. 16 i. USGS Hydrologic Unit Codes ............................................................................................................ 16 ii. State 305(b) Identification Numbers ................................................................................................ 16 iii. Other (Coordinates) .......................................................................................................................... 16 D. General Watershed Information ........................................................................................................... 16 i. Previous and Current Watershed Activities ..................................................................................... 16 II. WATERSHED PLAN DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................... 17 A. Watershed Partners ................................................................................................................................ 17 B. Mission Statement .................................................................................................................................. 18 C. Structure, Organization, and Administration ....................................................................................... 18 D. General Plan Content ............................................................................................................................ 20 i. Outline of the Plan's Content ............................................................................................................ 20 ii. Endorsement of Plan by Key Watershed Partners .......................................................................... 20 iii. Endorsement of the Plan by Local Units of Government ............................................................... 20 iv. Information/Education Component for Public Understanding of the Project ............................ 21 III. WATERSHED INVENTORY .......................................................................................................................... 22 A. Description of the Watershed ............................................................................................................... 22 i. Geology .............................................................................................................................................. 22 1. Topography ...........................................................................................................................................22
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee
    The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 . II • r ,j • • ~1 =1 i1 .. ·~ II .I '1 .ill ~ I ... ... II 'II .fi :. I !~ ...1 . ~ !,~ .,~ 'I ~ J ·-=· ..I ·~ tJ 1;1 .. II "'"l ,,'\. d • .... ·~ I 3: ... • J ·~ •• I -' -\1 - I =,. The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee By WILLIAM F. OUTERBRIDGE A highly dissected plateau with narrow valleys, steep slopes, narrow crested ridges, and landslides developed on flat-lying Pennsylvanian shales and subgraywacke sandstone during the past 1.5 million years U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Outerbridge, William F. The Logan Plateau, a young physiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1620) Bibliography: p. 18. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1620 1. Geomorphology-Logan Plateau. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1620 557.3 s [551.4'34'0975] 84-600132 [GB566.L6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Methods of study 3 Geomorphology 4 Stratigraphy 9 Structure 11 Surficial deposits 11 Distribution of residuum 11 Depth of weathering 11 Soils 11 Landslides 11 Derivative maps of the Logan Plateau and surrounding area 12 History of drainage development since late Tertiary time 13 Summary and conclusions 17 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean
    HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean The High Allegheny Plan is a first iteration, a scientific assessment of the ecoregion. As part of the planning process, other aspects of the plan will be developed in future iterations, along with updates to the ecological assessment itself. These include fuller evaluations of threats to the ecoregion, constraints on conservation activities, and implementation strategies. CSS is now developing a standard template for ecoregional plans, which we have applied to the HAL first iteration draft report, distributed in 2002. Some of the HAL results have been edited or updated for this version. Click on the navigation pane to browse the report sections. What is the purpose of the report template? The purpose of creating a standard template for ecoregional plans in the Northeast is twofold: — to compile concise descriptions of methodologies developed and used for ecoregional assessment in the Northeast. These descriptions are meant to meet the needs of planning team members who need authoritative text to include in future plan documents, of science staff who need to respond to questions of methodology, and of program and state directors looking for material for general audience publications. — to create a modular resource whose pieces can be selected, incorporated in various formats, linked to in other documents, and updated easily. How does the template work? Methods are separated from results in this format, and the bulk of our work has gone into the standard methods sections. We have tried to make each methods section stand alone. Every section includes its own citation on the first page.
    [Show full text]
  • Boone County
    The Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) FY 2014-2018 Region III Planning and Development Council Serving Boone, Clay, Kanawha and Putnam Counties 315 D Street South Charleston, WV 25303 (304) 744-4258 INDEX Page Introduction ………………………………………….. 3 County Summaries……………………………………………. 7 Boone…………………………. 8 Clay…………………………… 21 Kanawha……………………. 31 Putnam……………………… 49 SWOC Analysis……………………………………………….. 60 Strengths………………… 64 Weaknesses………………. 71 Opportunities…………… 73 Challenges………………… 74 Goals, Objectives & Strategies………………………….. 76 Performance Measures & Outcomes………………….. 80 Regional Economic Analysis……………………………… 82 Regional and County Project Lists…………………….. 90 RIC Progress Report……………………………………… 94 Appendix……………………………………………………… 100 2 INTRODUCTION This report constitutes the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for WV Region 3, which consists of Boone, Clay, Kanawha and Putnam Counties. It is developed by the Regional Intergovernmental Council (RIC) with the support of US EDA and in collaboration with the CEDS committee and local economic development agencies. The purpose of the CEDS is to provide an overview and analysis of current economic conditions and a future vision for the region. This vision is expressed as goals, objectives and strategies. Specific projects are also proposed. Region 3 has not escaped the impact of the recent economic downturn and is affected by the changing national and global economy. Like much of WV, the area is blessed with rich natural resources and the advantages, such as proximity to eastern markets. The primary challenge for the future is to use these advantages to develop and sustain a robust economy. The interstate highway system that serves Region III includes I-64, I-77 and I- 79. This interstate system has largely been responsible for Region III’s growth as a major distribution center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Abandoned Underground
    ABSTRACTS 1 DAY 1 Opening Session Chair: Kirk Beach Synthesis Study of State DOTs and the UK geotechnical Data Systems Robert C. Bachus, Kirk Beach, and Thomas Lefchik [email protected] There is little doubt that a functioning standardized distributed geotechnical database system would benefit the geotechnical community. There are any numbers of examples that can be cited to provide emphasis to this point, as many of the participants at this conference are well-aware. One example, and the one that will be focused in this presentation, includes the geotechnical engineers and geologists from the various state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) across the country. These agencies have historically collected (and continue to collect) a tremendous amount of geotechnical and geologic information during the execution of highway construction projects. Unfortunately, there are currently no standardized guidelines for collecting, storing, or managing these data. While many of the DOTs have developed some form of a geotechnical management system that works for their respective state, very few have developed systems that treat geotechnical information as “data”. Historically, many DOTs have looked to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for guidance related to technical issues, particularly the issues that are common to and affect virtually all agencies, regardless of the geologic or geographic setting. The issue of geotechnical data management is one of these areas where FHWA involvement and guidance would be beneficial to several agencies. Although there has not necessarily been a formal “request for guidance” to the FHWA from all of the DOTs, a few of the states have either solicited FHWA assistance or taken the initiative to develop state- specific data management systems.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2007
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Air Pollution Control Ohio’s PM 2.5 Recommended Designations Prepared by: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Air Pollution Control December 2007 [This page intentionally left blank] Page 2 of 177 Acknowledgement The Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control would like to express appreciation for the extensive efforts, guidance and expertise provided by the Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research staff, especially Ed Simmons. The level of detailed county-specific information provided in this document would not have been possible without Mr. Simmons efforts and timely assistance. Appreciation is also extended to Greg Stella at Alpinegeophysics, Inc. and to Mark Janssen at Midwest RPO for their assistance with the emissions data included in this submittal. Page 3 of 177 [This page intentionally left blank] Page 4 of 177 List of Appendices A. Air Quality System (AQS) data sheets B. Ohio EPA, DAPC PM2.5 summary sheets C. SLAMS 2006 PM2.5 certification D. Speciation data E. Meteorology data, wind roses F. Physiographic, elevation and land cover maps G. Jurisdiction boundary maps H. County profiles and statewide informational maps I. Public notice, public hearing, and response to comments documentation Page 5 of 177 Current PM2.5 Ohio EPA Nonattainment Recommended Designation Area Designation Nonattainment Counties Counties (1) Canton-Massillon, OH Stark Stark Butler Butler Clermont Clermont (2) Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Hamilton Hamilton Warren
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Kentucky Stream and Wetland Restoration Program
    Compensation Planning Framework Northern Kentucky Stream and Wetland Restoration Program February 2012 (Future proposed changes in red) LRL-2010-326-pgj This Compensation Planning Framework (CPF) addresses the requirements of 33 CFR 332.8[c], and describes how the Northern Kentucky Stream and Wetland Restoration Program (NKSWRP), using a watershed-based approach, will select in-lieu fee mitigation project sites to compensate for aquatic resource impacts. The NKSWRP is described at http://environmentalrestoration.nku.edu. The NKSWRP is also referred to as the NKU Stream Program. Figures and Tables referenced in the text are provided at the end of this document. I. SERVICE AREA The NKSWRP serves a single Service Area encompassing the northern Kentucky region, a region which shares common characteristics including physiography, Ecoregions, topography, land use, historic and current stream impairments, wildlife preservation prioritization, and community and governmental natural resource management partnerships. The core of the Service Area is comprised of the nine northern-most Kentucky counties: Boone, Kenton, Campbell, Carroll, Gallatin, Grant, Pendleton, Bracken, and Mason. These counties are readily accessible from NKU for project implementation (approximately one hour or less travel time, thus facilitating utilization of NKU student interns), and have the closest cultural ties to NKU and the northern Kentucky metropolitan area. At present the NKSWRP is the only in-lieu fee program serving the nine core Service Area counties. The remainder of the state is served by Kentucky Division of Fish and Wildlife. Outlying counties of the northern Kentucky region and within the NKSWRP Service Area include particularly Oldham, Trimble, Henry, Owen, Harrison, Robertson and Nicholas.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Region Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Vegetation Classification and Mapping at Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR—2007/079 USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site ON THE COVER Allegheny Hardwood Forest in Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site. Photograph by: Ephraim Zimmerman. USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site Vegetation Classification and Mapping at Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2006/079 Stephanie J. Perles1, Gregory S. Podniesinski1, Ephraim A. Zimmerman1, Elizabeth Eastman 2, and Lesley A. Sneddon3 1 Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 208 Airport Drive Middletown, PA 17057 2 Center for Earth Observation North Carolina State University 5112 Jordan Hall, Box 7106 Raleigh, NC 27695 3 NatureServe 11 Avenue de Lafayette, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02111 March 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Northeast Region Philadelphia, Pennsylvania i USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site The Northeast Region of the National Park Service (NPS) comprises national parks and related areas in 13 New England and Mid-Atlantic states. The diversity of parks and their resources are reflected in their designations as national parks, seashores, historic sites, recreation areas, military parks, memorials, and rivers and trails. Biological, physical, and social science research results, natural resource inventory and monitoring data, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences related to these park units are disseminated through the NPS/NER Technical Report (NRTR) and Natural Resources Report (NRR) series.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Seismic Lines Across the Rome Trough and Allegheny Plateau of Northern West Virginia, Western Maryland, and Southwestern Pennsylvania
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I–2791 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REGIONAL SEISMIC LINES ACROSS THE ROME TROUGH AND ALLEGHENY PLATEAU OF NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA, WESTERN MARYLAND, AND SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA By Christopher S. Kulander 1 and Robert T. Ryder 2 INTRODUCTION having thin-skinned structures with greater tectonic shortening. These provinces meet at a physiographic and structural boundary The study area for this investigation is the central Appalachian called the Allegheny structural front. The Rome trough, a north­ basin (see index map below). The northern West Virginia, west­ east-trending graben that involves basement, underlies the ern Maryland, and southwestern Pennsylvania parts of the cen­ Allegheny Plateau (fig. 2). Commonly, basement rocks in the tral Appalachian basin consist of complex structural geometries Rome trough are buried beneath at least 20,000 feet (ft) of and a thick Paleozoic sequence. Here, the basin coincides with Paleozoic strata (Shumaker, 1996). Little has been published that is related to the deep structure of 80˚ the Rome trough in northern West Virginia, western Maryland, and southwestern Pennsylvania. Wells drilled to basement are absent here and most of the multi-fold seismic data are propri­ etary. Although Ryder (1991) and Ryder and others (1992) con­ NY structed several detailed stratigraphic cross sections of Cambrian and Ordovician strata across parts of the Rome trough and Shumaker (1996) mapped basement structure along the entire PA NJ 40˚ Rome trough from central Kentucky to northeastern Pennsylvania, few interpreted, regional seismic-based geologic OH MD DE cross sections have been published in this area. The objective of this investigation is to interpret the structure and stratigraphy of 40˚ WV the Rome trough and Allegheny Plateau of northern West VA Virginia, western Maryland, and southwestern Pennsylvania KY based on three multi-fold seismic lines acquired by Amoco in the early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of Pennsylvania
    Climate of Pennsylvania Introduction This publication consists of a narrative that describes some of the principal climatic features and a number of climatological summaries for stations in various geographic regions of the State. The detailed information presented should be sufficient for general use; however, some users may require additional information. The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) located in Asheville, North Carolina is authorized to perform special services for other government agencies and for private clients at the expense of the requester. The amount charged in all cases is intended to solely defray the expenses incurred by the government in satisfying such specific requests to the best of its ability. It is essential that requesters furnish the NCDC with a precise statement describing the problem so that a mutual understanding of the specifications is reached. Unpublished climatological summaries have been prepared for a wide variety of users to fit specific applications. These include wind and temperature studies at airports, heating and cooling degree day information for energy studies, and many others. Tabulations produced as by-products of major products often contain information useful for unrelated special problems. The Means and Extremes of meteorological variables in the Climatography of the U.S. No.20 series are recorded by observers in the cooperative network. The Normals, Means and Extremes in the Local Climatological Data, annuals are computed from observations taken primarily at airports. The editor of this publication expresses his thanks to those State Climatologists, who, over the years, have made significant and lasting contributions toward the development of this very useful series.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Evaluation of Forest Sites on the Northern Cumberland Plateau
    .,;;~~~\ United States IttAc.. !)) Department of Classification and Evaluation \:..~ Agriculture Forest Service of Forest Sites on the Southern Forest Northern Cumberland Plateau Experiment Station New Orleans, Louisianfl General rechnical Report SO-60 March 1986 Glendon W. Smalley SUMMARY This paper presents a comprehensive forest site classification system for the northern Cumberland Plateau in north central Tennessee and eastern Ken­ tucky. The system is based on physiography, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. Twenty-four landtypes are described and evaluated in terms of productivity and desirability of selected pines and hardwoods for timber pro­ duction. Also, each landtype is rated for five soil-related problems that can affect forest management operations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my colleagues, past and present, for their scientific input, reviews, and stimulating discussions. I am also grateful to the soil scientist$, silviculturists, plant ecologists, and practicing foresters who have reviewed this guide. CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................... 1 Northern Cumberland Plateau Region............................. 1 Subregions and LandtypeAssociations ..... ..... ... .. .. ... .. ...... 11 Landtypes ....................................................... 15 Forest Management Interpretations ............................... 16 Using the System ................................................ 17 Landtype Descriptions and Forest Management Interpretations . 23 Literature Cited ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Plan: Geology of the Cumberland Plateau Grades
    National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Obed Obed Wild & Scenic River Tennessee Lesson Plan: Geology of the Cumberland Plateau Grades: 4-7 Stage 1: Desired Results: Understandings: Essential Questions: Students will understand that… When was the Cumberland Plateau formed? The geologic history of the Obed goes back 250 What can studying the geologic history of the million years. Obed tell us about the environment surrounding the river? The geologic deposits which can be seen at the Obed took place at different times in geologic What periods of geologic time can be seen at history. the Obed? Students will know… Obed Wild and Scenic River has been cutting through the Cumberland Plateau for millions of years. The different periods of geologic time can be studied at the Obed. National Parks such as the Obed WSR play an important role in preserving many of our country’s important natural areas. Students will be able to… Identify several periods of geologic time represented at Obed Wild and Scenic River. Describe how the Cumberland Plateau was formed. Identify ways in which the Cumberland Plateau has changed over the years and what environmental conditions lead to those changes. 1 Stage 2 – Assessment Evidence: Performance tasks: Pre-Assessment: Teachers may want to use their own pre-assessment based on their students’ abilities and needs. One fill-in sheet as a pre-assessment has been provided that may need to be modified for students (may also be used as a post-assessment.) Stage 3—Learning Plan: Learning Activities: Preparation: Materials: Obed WSR brochure, lesson plan, pre/post-assessment sheet, geologic time scale, KWL (know, what to learn, learned) chart, website for Obed/NPS.
    [Show full text]